ML20134B518
Text
,
f3 A
/[ q 4 g " ' %,
UNITED STATES
[
.,, +.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[,,'{,,i c- (.
REGION V 0, * #wmN SUITE 202, W ALNUT CREEK PLAZA
% 'O D
,o 1990 N. CALIFORNIA SOULCVARD
- +,e*
WALNUT CREEK, C ALIFORNI A 94S96
'JUL 2 7 EM Docket Nos. 50-528, 50-529 50-530 Arizona Public Service Company P. O. Box 21666 Phoenix, Arizona 85036 Attention: Mr. E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
Vice President, Construction Projects and ANPP Project Director Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated July 21, 1978 informing us of the steps you have taken to correct the item which we brought to your attention in our letter dated June 14,1978. Your corrective actions will be verified during a future inspection.
Your cooperation with us is' appreciated.
Sincerely, ll
$/
Y~l t
G. S. Spencer, Chief M,
Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch 85001%7050703 M
($$cHToe4-293 FwA,St-293 L/37
r 1
e, ANPP-11407 'AR July 21, 1 3 ATTACHMENT A Docket Nos. 50-528, 50-529, 50-530 Construction Permit Nos. CPPR-141, 142 and 143 l
Notice of Violation Based on the results of an NRC Inspection on April 10-14, 1978, it appears that one of your activities was not in full compliance with the requirement of 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, as in-plemented by the PSAR (Chapter 17).
Contrary to these requirements, on April 10, 1978, the NRC inspector observed that the change to the Marathon drawing on Change Notice VRC No. 666, dated darch 15, 1978, was not distributed or used at the location where the work was
,being performed.
This is an infraction.
Response
The referenced Vendor Revision Change Notice (VRCN) was written against Harathon Steel's fabrication list (cut sheet).
This re-vision had no effect on the installation drawing 13-10407-011-F45-5 and, therefore, was not required at the location where the work was being performed.
Consequently, in this instance this may not be a violation of the quality assurance program require-ments.
However, the drawing control system used at Palo Verde depends on strict administrative controls and close attention by the Craft Superintendents and Field Engineers.
In order to strengthen these controls, the following steps have been taken since the last NRC Inspectiont 1.
Procedure Change Notice (PCN) #7 to Work Plans Proceduroa (WP/P) 3.0, Field Control of Design Documents, was issued on June 28, 1978 which states:
"The crafts shall be provided with DCN's, FCN's, VRCN's and FCR's as required to perform their work as determined by the Area Engineer (AE) or his designee."
i l
++
- 1PP-11407-JAR 2 1-/ 01, ;
3 l
Attachment A I
Page 2 l
l-2.
Foremen and General Foremen have been verbally I
advised by the Area Field Engineers (AFE's) that it is their responsibility to request replace-ment of drawings and changes that are damaged or destroyed and to inform the AFE's'of any known out-of-date revisions.
3.
The Matrix which identifies the drawings that'go to the respective crafts level is reviewed and revised on a monthly basis by the AE.
New and revised drawings are distributed to the crafts as they are received or as determined by the AE.
The craft stick files are audited against the-Matrix on a monthly basis by the Area Clerk to insure that the drawings are in accordance with the Matrix requirements.
4.
During the Area Engineers / Lead Discipline Field Enhineers meetings drawing control is discussed at a minimum of once a month, with emphasis placed
}
on keeping drawing stick files current and to the latest Field Revision Log (FRL) and Daily Notifi-cation List (DNL), in accordance with the Matrix requirements as established by the AE's.
j u
l 5.
Design Document Control Center (DDCC) personnel l
perform audits at least monthly at Maintained' Drawing Stations to the latest FRL and'DNL in accordance with the particular area Matrix.. Dis-l crepancies which are found are corrected within
(:
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
b k
L
+
i l
j '. -
(
?..
f' f
r l
,e l-
- -