ML20132A452

Requests Comments on Subj Facil Requesting Fee Reevaluation Re Ring Girder Surveillance Test

ML20132A452
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	12/08/1978
From:	Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Reid R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20125B444	List: IA-96-207, Forwards Comments by NRC Re Proposed NRC Responses to Senator Schweiker & R Nader on Security Problem.Draft Responses Encl IR 05000289/1974015 IR 05000289/1976008 IR 05000289/1977013 IR 05000289/1977036 ML20125B442 ML20125B445 ML20125B450 ML20126M904 ML20127A093 ML20127A097 ML20127B890 ML20128F507 ML20128F533 ML20128F556 ML20128F571 ML20128F641 ML20128F668 ML20128F893 ML20128F895 ML20128F904 ML20128F922 ML20128F956 ML20128F977 ML20129F343 ML20129F351 ML20129F370 ML20129F474 ML20129F487 ML20129F516 ML20129G431 ML20129G460 ML20129G511 ML20129G571 ML20129G612 ML20129G638 ML20129G768 ML20129H076 ML20129H083 ML20129H089 ML20129H097 ML20129H105 ML20129H111 ML20129H114 ML20129H128 ML20129H146 ML20129H165 ML20129H188 ML20129H201 ML20132A345 ... further results
References
FOIA-96-207 NUDOCS 7812190223
Download: ML20132A452 (2)

Text

-

S, .

• % UNITED 51Affs

(( *, NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N

= N j ,f ' .j WASHINGTON, D C. 20555

• } [f a

s.,

.. ,~

t i

DEC 8 1978 DOCKET NO. 50-289 MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert W. Reid, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch No. 4, 00R FROM:

William 0. Miller, Chief License fee Management Dr., ADM LICENSE AMENDMENT FEE FOR TM1-1 f,PPLICATION DATED

SUBJECT:

AUGUST 30, 1978 (CHAT 4GE REQUEST NO. 77) l By letters dated October 11 and November 29, 1978, we advised Metro-i politan Edison Company (Meted) that a Class 11 anendnent fee is required i

for the subject application relating to Ring Girder Surveillance Test.

' Meted's original reason for not submitting a fee was that the applica-tion was initiated in response to an NRC request dated Occcmber 29, 1977.

Our position (supported by your fee form nuinber 4-87/78 dated September 19)

.l was that although the application was as a result of an NRC request, I

it is not being considered for the convenience of the Connission nor is j

it to simplify or clarify the Technical Specifications.

1 Enclosed is a copy of a December i letter from Meted cbjecting to the i

fee, providing their reasons for their position that a fee is not required, i

j and requesting rereview of our determination. It is requested that your staff review the facts presented in the Meted letter and provide this Branch with your specific comments thereon so that we can respond to j Meted. Although your staff perhaps has not completed their final review i

of the August 30 application, we are asking for your reassessment of j the fee at this tine because the fee issue has to be resolved before the amendment is issued and hopefully can be done in a satisfactory manner l before too much time is expended on the review.

i b N.{.'.O\5(N William O. Miller, Chief

License fee Management Branch 4

Office of Aduinistration i

j

Enclosures:

l. Meted Ltr 12/1/78

! 2. ORD fee form dtd 9/19/78 i

j cc: See page 2 1

1 i ~ 6~ ~

j

' ^ .

s . .

Robert W. Reid, Chief ccs: G. Zwetzig, ORB-4 w/encls.

R. Ingram, ORB-4 w/encls. ,

Regulatory Docket File w/o ench,s. =

! LFMB Reactor file w/ encl. 1 R. Diggs w/ encl. 1 l

l l

l

[

l i

I l

l i

f i

I l

4

]

I I

i e

!----. . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __