ML20082C140

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Excluding Mtc Test Prescribed by TS 4.1.1.3.2.c for Period of 23 Days or Until Approval of TS Change
ML20082C140
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/04/1995
From:
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20082C135 List:
References
NUDOCS 9504060175
Download: ML20082C140 (15)
v • d • e


Text

__

l s

i

'f t

4 ATTACHMENT A i

NPF-38-165 1

PDR9504060175 950404 P ADOCK 05000385 PDR -

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.1.3 The moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) shall be within the limits specified in the COLR. The maximum upper design limit shall be:

a. Less positive than 0.5 x 10 delta k/k/*F whenever THERMAL POWER is

$70% RATED THERMAL POWEP., and

b. Less positive than 0.0 x 10 delta k/k/*F whenever THERMAL POWER is

>70% RATED THERMAL POWER.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1"U and 2*#

AGI13:

With the moderator temperature coefficient outside any one of the above limits, be in at least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.1.1.3.1 The MTC shall be determined to be within its limits by confirmatory measurements. MTC measured values shall be extrapolated and/or compensated to i permit direct comparison with the above limits. '

4.1.1.3.2 The MTC shall be determined at the following feequencies and THERMAL POWER conditions during each fuel cycle: ,

I

a. Prior to initial operation above 5% of RATED THERMAL POWER, after each fuel loading.
b. At greater than 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER, prior to reaching 40 EFPD core burnup.
c. At any THERMAL POWER, within 7 EFPD of reaching two-thirds of expected core burnup.
  • With K greater than or equal to 1.0.
  • geSpYc'ialTestException3.10.2.

See Special Test Exception 3.10.2 applicable for Mode I during startup test of Cycle 2.

WATERFORD - UNIT 3 3/4 1-4 AMENDMENT NO. WO2 i

j .

l I

i l

f t

. ENTERGY OPERATIONS l WATERFORD 3 i

i 4

i i

)

l CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT FOR CYCLE 7 i

REVISION 0 O

e

., ,,.,..--e_-,-v.,,--a.__,-,, e . .---,m-,, .n-, , - - , _ _ . ,

i e .. .

i

! l l l III. CORE OPERATING LIMITS

The operating limits for the specifications listed are presented below

i

+

1) 3.1.1.1 - Shutdown Margin - Any Full Length CEA Withdrawn 1

The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be greater than or equal to 5.15% ak/k when aT vgi s  ;

J greater than 200 F or 2.0% Ak/k when T avg is less than or equal to 200 F.

l 21 3.1.1.2 - Shutdown Margin - All Full Length CEA Fully Inserted l The SHUTDOWN MARGIN shall be greater than or equal to that shown in Figure 1.

i 4 l l 3) 3.1.1.3 - MODERATOR TEMPER ATURE COEFFICIENT The Moderator Temperature Coefficient (MTC) shall be:

l 1

i a) Less positive than + 0.5 x 10-4 Ak/k/'F whenever THERMAL POWER is s 705 l of RATED THERMAL POWER, and b) Less positive than 0.0 x 10-4 Ak/k/*F wheneverWERMAL POWER is > 70% of i RATED THERMAL POWER, and c) Less negative than -3.3 x 10-4 Ak/k/*F at all levels of THERMAL POWER.

I i

j 4) 3.1.2.9 - BORON DILUTION Limiting Condition ihr Operation With one or both start-up channel high neutron flux alarms inoperable, do not operate the plant in the configurasions prohibited by Table I through 5 for the current Mode.

Action With one or both start-up channel high neutron flux alarms inoperable, the RCS boron concentration shall be determined at the applicable monitoring frequency specified in Tables I through 5.

Surveillance Requirements Each required boron dilution alarm shall be adjusted to less than or equal to twice (2x) the existing neutron flux (cps) at the following frequencies:

a. At least once per 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> if the reactor has been shut down less than 25 hour2.893519e-4 days <br />0.00694 hours <br />4.133598e-5 weeks <br />9.5125e-6 months <br />s:

4

I c.

to l

l l

t I

I l

l l

l I

ATTACHMENT B i

I l

NPF-38-165 i i

f l

l l

t t

l l

l l

i e-

~ - . . - . . . . - . - , . -. .. .- - -

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS-MODERATOR' TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.1.1.3 The moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) shall be within the limits specified in )

l- the COLR ' The maximum upper design limit shall be: l

a. Less positive than 0.5 x 10 -4 delta k/k/'F whenever THERMAL POWER l 1s s70% RATED THERMAL POWER, a'nd '
b. Less positive than 0.0 x 10 -4 delta k/k/*F whenever THERMAL POWER  !

is >70% RATED THERMAL POWER, and l APPLICABILITY: MODES II M and 2*#

ACTION: '

With the moderator temperature coefficient outside any one of the above limits, be in at l' least HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS i

4.1.1.3.1 The MTC shall be determined to be within its limits by confirmatory measurements. i MTC measured values shall be extrapolated and/or compensated to permit direct comparison j with the above limits. l l

4.1.1.3.2 The MTC shall be determined at the following frequencies and THERMAL POWER conditions during each fuel cycle:

a. Prior to initial operation above 5% of RATED THERMAL POWER, after each fuel loading.
b. At greater than 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER, prior to reaching 40 EFPD core burnup.
c. At any THERMAL POWER, within 7 EFPD of reaching two-thirds of expected

'l core burnup. I(l)

  • With Keff greater than or equal to 1.0. l
  1. See Special Test Exception 3.10.2.
  1. (1)See Special Test Excepticr. 3.10.2 applicable for Mcdc 1 dur%; st:rtup test cf Cycle 2.

This Surveillance test need not be performed for Cycle 7 I

. , , ~ - , - - . . ,

. APPENDIX A At-Power Measured ITC Data Reduction In this measurement, the reactivity defect induced by an inlet temperature increase is compensated by an opposite reactivity defect induced by a power reduction. Assuming a value' for the power coefficient, the moderator temperature coefficient can be obtained. The following reactivity balance is solved:

ap

  • AT = 0 .(A.1) in which:

ap is the power coefficient at constant volume average moderator temperature AP is the change in power level at is the isothermal moderator temperature coefficient at constant power AT is the change in core volume average moderator temperature due to the change in inlet temperature A best estimate power coefficient is used in this equation to infer the temperature coefficient. Since relative errors in power coefficients are directly translated into relative errors in temperature coefficients, it is important to have confidence in the best estimate power coefficient.

The core average moderator temperature used in the above equation must reflect the change in axial shape taking place during the test. The changes in moderator temperature due to the change in inlet temperature and to the change in power must be kept separate in the data reduction. Since these effects cannot be measured separately, a test simulation provides a relationship between Tn, i P and T,ye, and a regression is performed to express the core average temperature as a linear combination of inlet temperature and power:

Tove - a *i Tn + b*P (A.2)

This linear relationship, which is valid over a narrow range of the variables, is applied to each pair of measured T n and P to infer Tove.

3

It is interes to note that this definition of T,ye leads to lower values of AT,ye than t..e use of \(T in+Tmt), thus to more negative values of the measured ITC, in better agreement with the predictions.

The data reduction for the three new data points obtained after completion of Reference 2 is summarized in the next three tables. The top half of the table provides the results of the test simulation. Four ROCS calculations are performed at two power levels and two inlet temperatures. The edited core average temperatures and calculated reactivities are recorded. A regression of reactivity vs power and average temperature yield the power coefficient an and isothermal temperature coefficient ar(ITC). The best estimate coefficients are obtained by biasing the calculated coefficients. Then a regression of average temperature vs inlet temperature and power provides the coefficients a and b of equation A.2. The bottom half of the table provides the test conditions, which consist of eight swings of power-temperature. The inlet temperature and the secondary calorimetric power is recorded. The core average temperature is calculated from equation A.2. Then differences in average temperatures and powers are performed between each consecutive swing, and the reactivity defect Ap due to the change in power (at constant core average temperature) is obtained by multiplying the change in power by the best estimate power coefficient. Finally a regression of Ap vs ATove yields ,

the nieasured isothermal temperature coefficient.

l l

WATERFORD CYCLE 4 137 MWD /T,1076 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg- Tavg Tin Power Tavg React Tin Fitted Pit of Calculated ITC, Pwr Coeff Pit of Tavg vs. Tin,Pwr 540 93 577.37 0.003529 28.37 577.37 Regression Output: Regression Output:

557 ' 93 585.04 0.002887 28.04 585.04 Constnet 0.06052 Constant 21.13687 549 98 579.00 0.002992 30.00 579.00 Std Err of Y Est 0.00001 Std Err of Y Est 0.004999 557 98 586.66 0.002324 29.66 586.66 R Squared 0.99975 R Squared 0.999999 No. of Observatices 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freedoni 1 Degrees of Freedom I X Coefficient (s) -8.22E-05 -8.55E-05 x Coefficient (s) 0.958125 0.325 Std Err of Coef. 2.75E-06 1.75E-06 Std Err of Coef. 6.25E-04 1.00E-03 Pwr Coeff ITC Best Est. Pwr Coeff -9.815E-05

MEASURED ITC, PWR COEFF Tin BDT Tout Tavg Inst BDT Sec. Delta Delta Delta

! Pwr Fitted Pwr Pwr CalPwr Tavg Pwr React 548.46 96.73 603.21 578.07 96.73 96.73 96.82 Regression Output:

55t;.7! 90.38 607.85 583.91 91.03 90.38 90.77 - 5.84 -6.35 -6.23E-04 Constant

-0.00003 548.11 96.64 602.65 577.70 96.64 96.64 96.64 -6.21 6.26 6.14E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.000035 557.11 89.94 607.76 584.15 90.14 89.94 89.93 6.45 -5.70 -6.58E-04 R Squared 0.997525

! 548.04 96.07 602.32 577.45 96.07 96.07 95.70 - -6.70 6.13 6.02E-04 No. of Observations -8 556.92 89.38 607.26 583.78 89.65 89.38 89.35 6.33 -6.69 -6.57E-04 Degrees of Freedom 6 548.08 95.21 601.97 577.21 95.21 95.21 95.18 -6.58 5.83 5.72E-04 l

556.73 89.08 607.01 583.50 89.28 89.08 89.09 6.30 -6.13 -6.02E-04 l

X Coefficient (s) -9.569E-05 = ITC

547.78 94.86 601.66 576.81 94.86 94.86 94.94 -6.70 5.78 5.67E-04 Std Err of Coef. - 1.95E-06 I

WATERFORD CYCLE 4 295 EFPD,370 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg- Tavg Tin Power Tavg React Tin Fitted Pit of Calculated ITC, Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin,Pwr 549 93 577.42 0.005435 28.42 577.42 Regression Output: Regression Output:

557 93 585.28 0.003846 28.28 585.28 Constant 0.1314 Constant 3.3121 549 98 579.31 0.004661 30.31 579.31 Std Err of Y Est 0.0000 Std Err of Y Est 0.0050 557 98 587.16 0.003031 30.16 587.16 R Squared 0.9999 R Squared 1.0000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freedom 1 Degrees of Freedom I X Coefficient (s) -8.17E-05 -2.049E-04 X Coefficient (s) 0.981875 0.377 Std Err of Coef. 4.43E-06 2.740E-06 Std Err of Coef. 6.25E-04 1.00E-03 Pwr Coeff ITC Best Est. Pwr Coeff -9.757E-05 MEASURED ITC, PWR COEFF Tin BDT Tout Tavg Inst BDT Sec Delta Delta Delta Pwr Fitted Pwr Pwr Cal Tavg Pwr React 552.35 98.60 607.76 582.82 98.60 98.60 98.6 Regression Output:

557.32 92.82 609.32 585.52 93.09 92.82 92.66 2.70 -5.78 -5.64E-04 Constant 0.000007 552.35 98.64 608.06 582.84 98.64 98.64 98.57 -2.69 5.82 5.68E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.000037 557.48 92.49 609.49 585.56 92.94 92.49 92.45 2.72 -6.15 -6.00E-04 R Squared 0.996820 552.46 98.52 608.04 582.90 98.52 98.52 98.53 -2.66 6.03 5.88E-04 No. of Observations 8 557.50 92.54 609.72 585.60 93.15 92.54 92.61 2.69 -5.98 -5.83E-04 Degrees of Freedom 6 552.61 98.52 608.11 583.05 98.52 98.52 98.63 -2.55 5.98 5.83E-04 557.67 92.93 609.77 585.91 93.21 92.93 92.71 2.86 -5.59 -5.45E-04 X Coefficient (s) -2.114E-04 = ITC 552.79 98.42 608.34 583.19 98.42 98.42 98.78 -2.72 5.49 5.36E-04 Std Err of Coef. 4.87E-06

WATERFORD CYCLE 5 90EFPH,1066 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF I

Tavg Tavg Tin Power Tavg React Tin Fitted Fit of Calculated TTC, Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin,Pwr

$49 93 576.85 0.005642 27.85 576.86 Regression Output Regression Output:

557 93 584.55 0.004952 27.55 584.55 Constant 0.06613 Constant 18.9968 549 98 578.48 0.005088 29.48 578.48 Std Err of Y Est 0.00001 Std Err of Y Est 0.0100 557 98 586.16 0.004373 29.16 586.17 R Squared 0.99978 R Squared 1.0000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freedoen 1 Degrees of Freedom I X Coefficient (s) -8.37E-05 -9.135E-05 X Coefficient (s) 0.96125 0.324 Std Err of Coef. 2.74E-06 1.744E-06 Std Err of Coef. 0.00125 0.002 Pwr Coeff TTC Best Est. Pwr Coeff -9.%2E-05 MEASURED ITC, PWR COEFF Tin BDT Tout Tavg Inst. BDT Sec. Delta Delta Delta Pwr Fitted Pwr Pwr CalPwr Tavg Pwr React 548.39 96.15 602.80 577.29 96.15 Regression Output:

555.98 90.59 606.96 582.78 90.59 5.49 -5.56 -5.54E-04 Constant -0.00005 547.97 95.62 602.06 576.71 95.62 -6.07 5.03 5.01E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.000014 556.50 89.52 606.70 582.94 89.52 6.22 -6.10 -6.08E-04 R Squared 0.999534 ,

547.36 95.35 601.41 576.04 95.35 -6.90 5.83 5.81E-04 No. of Observations 8 556.31 88.90 606.19 582.55 88.90 6.51 -6.45 -6.43E-04 Degrees of Freedom 6 547.76 94.25 600.94 576.07 94.25 -6.49 5.35 5.33E-04 556.24 -87.85 605.53 582.15 87.85 6.08 -6.40 -6.38E-04 X Coefficient (s) -9.119E-05 = frC 547.49 93.28 600.30 575.49 93.28 -6.65 5.43 5.41E-04 Std Err of Coef. 0.0000008035

, 1  ;

l l

l l WATERFORD CYCLE 5 291 EFPD,404 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg Tavg Tin Power Tavg React -Tin Fitted Fit of Calculated ITC, Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin,Pwr 549 93 577.32 0.003743 28.32 577.33 Regression Output: Regression Output:

557 93 585.19 0.002178 28.19 585.18 Constant 0.12786 Constant 2.96450 549 98 579.21 0.002973 30.21 579.21 Std Err of Y Est 0.00002 Std Err of Y Est 0.01000 557 98 587.06 0.001367 30.06 587.06 R Squated 0.99984 R Squared 1.00000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freedom i Degrees of Freedom I X Coefficient (s) -8.226E-05 -2.017E-04 x Coefficient (s) 0.9825 0.376 Std Err of Coef. 4.630E-06 2.865E-06 Std Err of Coef. 0.00125 0.002 Pwr Coeff ITC Best Est. Pwr Coeff -9.817E-05 MEASURED ITC, PWR COEFF Tin BDT Tout Tavg last BDT Sec Delta Delta Delta Pwr Fitted Pwr Pwr Cal Tavg Pwr React

$52.04 95.21 606.05 581.14 95.21 95.21 95.01 Regression Output:

557.29 88.80 607.59 -583.89 88.81 88.80 88.77 2.75 -6.41 -6.29E-04 Constant 0.000005 551.15 96.67 605.67 580.82 96.67 96.67 96.51 -3.07 7.87 7.73E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.000075 557.46 89.08 607.76 584.16 89.08 89.08 88.72 3.35 -7.59 -7.45E-04 R Squared 0.991574 551.11 96.26 605.88 580.62 96.26 06.26 96.38 -3.54 7.18 7.05E-04 No. of Observations 8 557.46 88.89 607.80 584.09 89.17 38.89 88.86 3.47 -7.37 -7.24E-04 Degrees of Freedom 6 551.29 96.35 605.88 580.83  %.35 96.35 96.47 -3.26 7.46 7.32E-04 557.65 89.33 608.11 584.44 89.33 89.33 88.87 3.61 -7.02 -6.89E-04 X Coefficient (s) -2.119E-04 = ITC 551.32 96.29 606.09 580.84 96.29 96.29 96.49 -3.60 6.96 6.83E-04 Std Err of Coef. 0.0000079741 n

4

WATERFORD CYCLE 6 3 EFPD, ll31 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg Tavg Tin Power Tavg React -Tin Fitted Fit of Calculated ITC, Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin,Pwr '

547 93 ' 573.80 0.003514 26.80 573.80 Regression Output: Regression Output:

555 93 ' 581.50 0.002940 26.50 581.50 Constant 0.05306 Constant 18.2588 547 87 571. % 0.004141 24.% 571.97 Std Err of Y Est 0.00001 Std Err of Y Est 0.0100 555 87 579.68 0.003595 24.68 579.67 R Squared 0.99970 R Squared 1.0000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 i Degrees of Freedom 1 Degrees of Freedom 1 X Coefficient (s) -8.47E-05 -7.263E-05 X Coefficient (s) 0.96375 0.305 Std Err of Coef. 2.52E-06 1.910E-% Std Err of Coef. 0.00125 0.00166666 .i Pwr Coeff Pred. ITC 8est Est.-l.010E-04 -8.523E-05 l MEASURED ITC l

Tin Sec.' Tout Tavg Inst. BDT Sec. Delta Delta Delta CalPr Fitted Pwr Pwr. CalPwr Tavg Pwr React Fit of Delta-React vs Delta-Tave  ;

555.02 89.003 607.32 580.31 88.945 89.003 Regression Output; 546.68 -93.562 602.23 573.66 ' 93.CS7 93.562 -6.65 4.56 4.61E-04. Constant -0.0000450 554.60 88.467 606.51 579.74 88.615 88.467 6.08 -5.09 -5.15E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.00002610 +

546.42 93.389 601.46 573.35 93.331 93.389 -6.38 4.92 4.97E-04 R Squared 0.99796387 554.64 87.964 605.98 579.62 87.546 87.964 6.27 -5.42 -5. 48E- 04 No. of Observations 7

  • 546.77 -92.117 601.43 573.30 92.306 92.117 -6.32 4.15 4.20E-04 Degrees of Freedom 5 554.71 86.910 605.82 579.37 86.776 86.910 .6.06 -5.21 -5.26E-04 Meas ITC 546. % 91.381 601.06 573.26 90.910 91.381 -6.11 4.47 4,52E-04 X Coefficient (s) -7.893E-05 Std Err of Coef. 0.00000159

?

_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ .__ .----- - . . . _ . .- - ~ , - - - _ -

~.

WATERFORD CYCLE 6 314 EFPD, 444 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg Tavg Tin Power Tavg React -Tin Fitted Fit of Calculated ITC. Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin.Pwr 548 92 575.07 v.Mm7 27.07 575.08 Regression Output: Regression Output:

556 92 582.94 0.000736 26.94 582.93 Constant 0.11781 Constant 4.2925 M8 100 577.93 0.000995 29.93 577.92 Std Err of Y Est 0.00003 Std Err of Y Est 0.0150 556 100 585.77 -0.000509 29.77 585.78 R Squared 0.99968 R Squared 1.0000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freedom 1 Degrees of Freedom 1 X Coefficient (s) -8.50E-05 -1.875E-M X Coefficient (s) 0.981875 0.355625 Std Err of Coef. 4.56E-06 4.368E-06 Std Err of Coef. 0.001875 0.001875 Pwr Coeff Pred. ITC Best Est.-l.098E-04 -1.933E-04 MEASURED ITC Tin Sec. Tout Tavg Inst. BDT Sec. Delta Delta Delta CalPwr Fitted Pwr Pwr Calfwr Tavg Pwr React Fit of Delta-React vs Delta-Tave 555. M 91.590 608.77 582.43 91.590 Regression Output:

548.28 99.678 606.42 578.08 99.678 -4.35 8,09 8.88E-04 Constant 0.00001731 555.73 91.524 608.56 582.49 91.524 4.42 -8.15 -8.95E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.00003418 547.92 99.903 606.38 577.80 99.903 -4.69 8.38 9.20E-04 R Squared 0.99895310 555.82 91.660 608.77 582.63 91.660 4.83 -8.24 -9.05E-04 No. of Observations 7 548.30 100.120 606.73 578.25 100.120 -4.38 8.46 9.29E-04 Degrees of Freedom 5 556.01 91.895 608.84 582.90 91.895 4.65 -8.23 -9.03E-04 Meas ITC M8. 61 99.850 606.73 578.46 99.850 -4.44 7.95 8.74E-04 X Coefficient (s) -1.982C-04 Std Err of Coef. 0.00000286

. _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - . . . - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ = _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ .

J WATERFORD CYCLE 7 32.2 EFPD, 1162 PPM CALCULATED ITC, POWER COEFF Tavg Tavg Tin Power Tavg React -Tin Fitted Fit of Calculated ITC. Pwr Coeff Fit of Tavg vs. Tin.Pwr 548 92 574.80 0.004691 26.80 574.81 Regression Output: Regression Output:

556 92 582.45 0.004190 26.45 582.44 Constant 0.05055 Constant 23.4050 548  % 576.03 0.004287 28.03 576.03 Std Err of Y Est 0.00001 Std Err of Y Est 0.0100 556  % 583.66 0.003771 27.66 583.66 R Squared 0.99984 R Squared 1.0000 No. of Observations 4 No. of Observations 4 Degrees of Freed s 1 De9rees of Freedom 1 X Coefficient (s) -8.26E-05 -6.656E-05 X Coefficient (s) 0.955 0.305 Std Err of Coef. 2.07E-06 1.069E-06 Std Err of Coef. 0.00125 0.00249999 Pwr Coeff Pred. ITC 8est Est.-9.936E-05 -7.949E-05 MEASURED ITC Tin Sec. Tout Tavg Inst. BDT Sec. Delta Delta Delta CalPwr Fitted Pwr Pwr CalPwr Tavg Pwr React Fit of Delta-React vs Delta-Tave 55.5.98 91.945 610.29 582.41 91.741 91.945 Regression Output:

547.92 96 302 605.22 576.04 96.563  % .302 -6.37 4.36 4.33E-04 Constant 0.00000824 556.05 91.904 610.24 582.46 92.140 91.904 6.42 -4.40 -4.37E-04 Std Err of Y Est 0.00002111 548.13 96 292 605.32 576.24  % .446  % .292 -6.23 4.39 4.36E-04 R Squared 0.99829705 556.29 91.887 610.31 582.69 91.686 91.887 6.45 -4.41 -4.38E-04 No. of Observations 7 548.24 96 181 605.39 576.31 95.947 96 181 -6.38 4.29 4.27E-04 Degrees of Freedom 5 556.40 91.800 610.78 582.77 91.784 91.800 6.46 -4.38 -4.35E-04 Heas ITC 548.81 96 347 606.05 576.90  % .523  % .347 -5.86 4.55 4.52E-04 X Coefficient (s) -6.897E-05 Std Err of Coef. 0.00000127

. _ - - - --_ _ - - -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20082C140&oldid=2751188"