ML20062L094

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Util Request for Relief from Implementation Schedule for NUREG-0737,Item II.F.2, Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling. Proposed Program Is Unacceptable & Does Not Relieve NUREG-0737 Requirement
ML20062L094
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Prairie Island
Issue date: 12/18/1980
From: Rubenstein L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Novak T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML093450149 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-80-515, FOIA-80-555, RTR-NUREG-0737, TASK-2.F.2, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8101150059
Download: ML20062L094 (2)


Text

Y 20-555 k

j8 O

UNITED STATES g

g

>c 3 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

ii gg*v DEC l a 1980 MEMORANDUM FOR:

T. Novak, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors, DL

~

FROM:

L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core and Containment Systems, DSI

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR NUREG-0737, ITEM II.F.2. INSTRUMENTATION FOR DETECTION OF INADEQUATE CORE COOLING Plant Name:

Prairie Island 1 & 2 Docket Numbers:

50-282, 50-306 NSS Supplier:

Westinghouse Licensing Stage:

OR Responsible Branch:

Operation Reactors Branch #3 Project Manager:

R. Martin Review Status:

Complete The Thermal-Hydraulic Section of Core Performance Branch has reviewed Northern States Power Company's (NSP) request for relief from the implementation schedule for NUREG-0737, Item II.F.2 Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling for Prairie Island Units 1 & 2, dated November 20, 1980 from L. Mayer (NSP) to H. Denton (NRC).

NSP proposed to participate in an industry development program which is not defined and therefore does not include a schedule. Their guess is that the program would require two years for completion and an additional two years for procurement and installation of the equipment. There is no assurance that the program would be successful or would lead to choice of a system other than those which are already conmercially available. Finally, they propose to submit design details and their schedule for installation, testing, and evaluation of the selected system six months after the NRC certifies that the system is acceptable. We require such information before we can detennine that the system is acceptable.

The NSP proposal would result in clearly unacceptable delay in implementation of any system. This is contrary to the staff position which is clearly stated in NUREG-0737. Our letter to the Conmissioners, IECY-80-529 December 4,1980, recommends that the NUREG-0737 schedule requirements (January 1,1981 for selection and documentation of the measurement system and January 1,1982 for installation) should be maintained.

Contact:

T. Huang

.p X-29413

( gf

%) 0l

3 k

DEC 181980 T. M. Novak Please advise NSP that the program proposed in their November 20 subinittal is unacceptable and in no way relieves them of the responsiblity to provide the ~

~~

II.F.2 docuinentation required in January 1981 as specified in h0 REG-0737.

L. S. Rubens ein, Assistant Director for Core and Containment Systems Division of Systems Integration cc:

D. Ross L. Rubenstein W. Johnston L. Phillips P. Check M ang R. Martin R. Clark P. Grant v

- - -