ML20028F174
| ML20028F174 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1983 |
| From: | Hunter S JOINT INTERVENORS - WATERFORD |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028F173 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301310209 | |
| Download: ML20028F174 (14) | |
Text
_-_ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boaro In the Matter of )
) Docket No. 50-382 LOUISI ANA POWER 24 LIGHT CD. )
) January 26, 1983 (Waterford Steam Electric Station )
Unit 3)
Di tect Iestimggy gf Dt. Saugdta MacD. Huntet 0.1. Please give your name, present employment, and a statement of your qualifications.
A.1. My name is Saundra MacD. Hunter. I am an Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the Louisiana State University School of Medicine. I have included a copy nf my cu-riculum vitae as a separate attachment.
Q.2. Have you reviewed the evacuation brochure entitled " Plans to Help You During Emergencies" (Applicant Exhibit 13) and the attached colored map (Applicant Exhibit 14)?
A.2. Yes 0.3. Please comment on them.
A.3. The purpose of this brochure is to communicate and persuade individuals to follow certain practices of evacuation from the areas surrounding Waterford III Nuclear Power facility if an accident should occur. If the message is effective, the desired persuasive effect will take place. In line with this view. many researchers of the j communication process have presented messages of various types in order to assess their relative effectiveness toward behavioral motivation.
Simply, they asked "Will this style of message result in the behavior I wish to evoke".
There are three main elements in the communications process--the communicatgt . the message , and the tatget .
The Communicator Two main characteristics of communicator credibility are expertness cnd trustworthiness. Expertness may be a personal characteristic, deriving from special training or eduction, experience. social l
background. or even age. But it may also be more of a nominal
! characteristic stemming from position or status. A related but somewhat
! distinct attribute is the legitimate power held by the communicator.
l Legitimate power is based on the acceptance by the recipient of the idea l that the position or status of the communicator gives him the authority to influence people - by making decisions, determing policy, or giving orders.
Trustworthiness is also a property attributed to a highly credible communicator. The characteristics of a communicator that lead people to trust him may be widely varied. He may be trusted because he is in a position of authority. Certain personality characteristics, physical
, appearance, ways of expressing oneself, and style or mannerisms may be
! associated with trustworthiness.
8301310209 830126 PDR ADOCK 05000382 T PDR
4 Another factor in trustworthiness is the perceived intent of the communication, as gleaned from what he says or what is known about him.
If he stands to gain through acceptance of his message by other persons he is usually considered untrustworthy. Many people are skeptical of the communications of publicity agents, salesmen, politicians, and purveyors of products adverised in radio and television commercials.
A communicator who is perceived as untrustworthy or disliked may not only be ineffective, but may cause a " boomerang effect." The target may move in a direction opposite to the communications message.
The brochure displays a certain informality which is used to make people feel as if the source of the communication is friendly and trustworthy. The first page, however, is headed with "A Message to Our Friends and Neighbors" followed immediately by a statement which indicated that this brochure was prepared by State and Parish governments. And, finally signed by "Ikey", "Bert" and " Dave." This is very confusing and likely to result in low credibility attributed to the brochure. If the communicator is seen as untrustworthy, the brochure is likely to be discarded. No definitive study has been done to assess the trustworthiness and credibility of this brochure as a source of communication.
The Message Many aspects of the message may be considered as potentially affecting persuasion. Among these are emotional versus rational appeals and such organizational characteristics of the message as the ordering of elements within i t, the presence of reinforcina elements, the extent to which conclusions or recommendations are made explicit and the mention and refutation of counterarguments to the message theme.
The first question raised as to the effectiveness of the brochure must address the relative value of emotional versus rational appeals.
Would a strictly emotional appeal be more effective than a rational one which appeals to the intelligence and good sense of the audience?
Behavioral scientists have subjected to controlled experimentation the question of emotional versus rational appeals with very mix ed results.
Sometimes a rational appeal may arouse certain emotions; an emoti onal appeal may make a person think.
By its very nature (i.e. life or death) this brochure must speak to the emotion of fear. The use of fear appeals have been extensively
, researched to pin down the means by which it succeeds or fails to persuade. Advertisers sometimes use fear appeals to sell a product. The lack of use of toothpaste and deodorants arouse the threat of being unpopular. These influence attempts consist essentially of information describing a danger and recommendations for action that would avoid the danger.
Much research has addressed the intensity issue of fear appeals. If fear is thought of as a drive, a motivating force, then one might expect that the greater the fear, the stronger the influence. The basic idea is that fear acts as a motivating force leading the person to accept the recommendations offered in order to reduce his fear. but when fear is too strong, other processes enter in. For example, strong fear appeals may be seen as offensive, exaqqerated or deliberate attempts to scare the reader thus producing discounting of the communication and resistance to chance. Or when the reader actually becomes afraid, the individual may generate defenses against the fear, such as, arguments counter to those in the brochure.
Recent studies find that mild fear is associcated with less persuasion. Some 22 studies can be cited which indicate greater
persuasion when more intense fear is aroused. As a result, there are an abundance of interpretations and it has become necessary to postulate more precisely t le means by which fear facilitates or inhibits persuasion, and s 3 specify the conditions under which it does so.
The most powerful explanation has been postulated by Howard Leventhal. Fear arousing communication produces two parallel and independent reactions. One reaction is to ggntrgl_the_ feats aroused by the threats the other reaction is to ggge_with_thg_danget . While feat _ggntrol may take place by means of actions that cope with the danger, ma.- v other actions that control fear are either irrelevant to or interfere with coping behavior. For example, defenses against fear could include withdrawing from the situation, thinking up counterarguments against the threat, stop think about the danger, obtaining reassurance, or developing rationalizations for not worrying.
The other reaction- tg_g_gpg_with_the_danget -would include facing and acknowledging the danger, accepting the recommendation of the communication, adopting other adequate means of avoiding the danger, and obtaining additional infurmation on how to cope with it. Typically, there is some correlation between the fear and coping reactions. More seri ous threats elicit stronger emotional reactions. But this occurs because of the nature of the communications there is no necessary connection between fear arousal and coping behavior - one does not cause the other.
In this brochure. the desired effect would be to arouse fear (to its optimal level) ano have individuals cope with the fear by facing and acknowledging the danger and accepting the recommendations in the brochure. The undesired effect would be to arouse the fear only to have readers throw away the brauchure thus withdrawing from the situation.
thint up counterarguments against the threat, stop thinking about it, or develop rationalizations for not worrying. Of course, if the fear level is too low, the message in the brochure will be totally discounted.
Communications arousing high fear will be more effective if the response is delaved. The issue gets even more complicated since research has shown that personal characteristics of self-esteem affects the way in which a person reacts to or handles fear. The coping responses of individuals with low self-esteem are temporarily disrupted by their inability to handle the fear aroused. Other personal characterisics, such as avoiders-copers or feelings of vulnerability, effect behavioral responses to fear arousing si tuati ons. But, studies have shown that even for those with low self-esteem the desired behavior change was accomplished by action instructions. Thus, motivation is not enough to change behavior. The individual needs to perform a series of actions in order to cope with the danger. These actions need to bridge the gap all the way from the receipt of the communication to the final act.
What is the most effective order of presentation of separate communications? What is the most effective order of elements in a communication? The first question has led to a number of experiments to determine whether a message was more effective when it was presented before or after another communication. This is temmonly referred to as the primacy-recency question. If the first communication is more effective, the result is referred to as a primacy effect; if the last is more effective, as a recency effect.
A number of methodological problems in primacy-recency experimentation have made it difficult to determine whether primacy or recency of communication had the advantage. In the typical experiment, the two communications are presented in immediate succession and are
followed by an immediate test of recall. Presenting the communications in immediate succession provides little advantage to recency. These effects hold true with respect to the amount of learning of the communication that takes place.
Under nonexperimental conditions, primacy is likely to have advantages over recency. When a communication contains two kinds of elements, one tending to arouse a need and the other tending to satisfy the need, the most effective arrangement presents the need-arousing elements first and the elements providing need satisfaction last.
Since this is obviously a situation which can arouse fear, the brochure should clarify the need. Instead, fear is underplayed, put on a back page in small print. "If there is an accident, Waterford 3 can block the release of all or most of the radiation. But in a severe accident, some radioactive matter may be released. If it is, this matter will be carried in the air. If that happens, an emergency will be declared. You may then be asked to do certain things to protect yourself until the wind carries the radioactive matter away." Why should you protect youself if there is no danger from radioactive material. If there is no danger, why have a brochure explaining methods of evaucation.
When considering the message within the brochure. both arens of research-primacy / recency and fear arousal would suggest that the "need" or the " fear" situation should be placed first in the brochure.
Addi ti onal l y, separate brochures should be required based on distance from the power plant with highest fear appeals furthest away from Waterford. Action items, or "what to do" items should be placed second.
The most effective messages are those which have " hands on" practice sessions. An announcement should be made that a practice evacution will take place. People will read and take seriously the message when they realize that they will need to take action soon. A practice evacuation of these areas is essential.
The Target Selective retention is a result of utility. When housewives were offered a pamphlet on toilet training, those who had an infant in the relevant age bracket most often requested it and actually read it. If individuals believe that they will engage in the behavior at some future time (for example, a practice evacuation) they will learn the material in the brochure. As mentionet above the utility of the message to the target individual is essential, that is why unique brochures are needed depending on the distance the target is from Waterford. Educational level and self-esteem effect an individuals ability to respond to a crisis situation which requires action. This further emphasizes the need f or practice evacuations giving individuals with low confidence an opportunity to act.
In conclusion, based on experimental evidence and the contents of the brochure, it is my opinion that this brochure will be discarded because of low fear appeal and non-discriminated target persons (there are probably different fear levels and awareness levels within the 10 mile radius).
Given the present situation. I suggest the following:
- 1. A community based assessment of communicator credibility and trustworthiness, as well as, fear levels of residents based on distance from power plant.
- 2. Develop several brochures based on findings with pl ans f or practice evacuation.
. . _ _ -_-. - - - . - - . - . _ . - _ _ = - _ .
- 3. Announce through the media a practice evacuation. This announcement should include an explanation of the map and their location i o1 it.
- 4. Have a practice evacuation.
i 1
4
.I
.I 1
I
CURRICULUM VITAE Saundra MacD. Hunter, Ph.D.
Associate Professor Specialized Center of Research-Arteriosclerosis and Department of Family Medicine ADDRESS: 1542 Tulane Avenue Department of Family Medicine Louisiana State University Schoolof Medicine New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 TELEPIIONE: Offices: Specialized Center of Research-Arteriosclerosis (504) 568-4664 Department of Family Medicine (504) 568-4570 CURRENT POSITION:
Principal Investigator: Biobehavior Section of the Specialized Center of Research-Arteriosclerosis. The Bogalusa Heart Study.
Research Director: Department of Family Medicine RESEARCH ACTIVITIES:
Social and psychological determinants of health habits in children and adolescents. Health habits includes cigarette smoking, Type A coronary prone behavior pattern, eating patterns, coping styles, and compliance.
Physiological and biochemical responses to these health habits.
Design behavioral components for health habit intervention.
Design and implementation of many research projects in the Department of Family Medicine.
Writing Graduate and Undergraduate Training grants in Family Medicine.
EDUCATION:
Date, Major Field Degree Institution 1971 Sociology B.S. The University of Akron 1973 Sociology M.S. Iowa State University 1975 Sociology Ph.D. Iowa State University
HONORS:
Phi Kappa Delta PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: .
1981-date Specialized Center of Research - Associate Professor Arteriosclerosis (SCOR-A), Dept. of Medicine, LSU Medical Center, New Orleans, LA.
1978-date Blobehavior Section of SCOR-A, Principal Investigator The Bogalusa Heart Study 1978-date Department of Family Medicine, LSU Research Director Medical Center, New Orleans, La.
1975-1978 Department of Sociology, LSU - Assistant Professor Baton Rouge, Loulslana 1973-1975 Department of Sociology, Drake Lecturer University, Des Moines, Iowa 1973-1975 Department of Sociology, Iowa State Teaching and Research University, Ames, Iowa Assistant PROFESSION AL ORG ANIZATIONS:
American Sociological Associatloc.: Medical Sociology Section American Association of Public Health Southern Sociological Society Society for Teachers of Family Medicine Society for Behavioral Medicine TEACHING EXPERIENCE:
Undergraduate: Sociology Graduate: Sociology Introduction to Sociology Social Psychology Social Psychology Sociology of Medicine Research Methods Introduction to Statistics Industrial Sociology Marriage and the Family Sociology of Health and Illness Introduction to Social Life in the United States for Foreign Students Gerontology Medical Students: Seminars Residents: Seminar Compliance with Medical Regimens Research Methods for the Health Habits and Cardiovascular Disease Family Physician
LECTURES AND CONFERENCES:
- 1. Presenter: Rural Sociological Association Meetings. Section: Quality of Life.
Montreal, Canada,1974.
- 2. Discussant: Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists. Section: Quality of Life.
Mobile, Alabama, February,1976.
- 3. Discussant: Mid-South Sociological Meetings. Session: Sociology of Medicine.
November,1976.
- 4. Invited Lecturer: New Orleans Dietetic Association. "Value Clarification, Behavior Modification, and the Food-in-the-Door Technique: Compliance with Dietary Regimens." November,1976.
- 5. Invited Lecturer: Loyola University. " Stress and Cardiovascular Disease,"1978.
- 6. Invited Lecturer: William Carey College, School of Nursing, Summer,1978.
- 7. Organizer and Presider, Section: Sociology of Health. Mid-South Sociological Association, Monroe, Louisiana, November,1977.
- 8. Organizer and Presider, Section: Women and Health, Southern Sociological Society, Atlanta, Georgia,1979.
- 9. Invited Lecturer: Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation, Alumni Association. Scien*1fic Program. "The Role of Tobacco, Alcohol, Type A and Psychosocial Factors in Cardiovascular Disease." October,1980.
- 10. Invited Lecturer: Maryland Health Education Council. " Physiological Response to Stress in Children." Ocean City, Maryland. April,1981.
ABSTRACTS:
- 1. Sklov, M., Baugh, J.G., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Srinivasan, S.R., Voors, A.W.
and Berenson, G.S.: Cardiovascular risk factor variables and smoking behavior in children--The Bogalusa Heart Study. American Heart Association,53rd Scientific Sessio, s, Miami Beach, Florida, November,1980.
1 l 2. Berenson, G.S., Srinivasan, S.R., Hunter, S.M., Webber, L.S., Sklov, M. and Voors, A.W.: Cigarette smoking, oral contraceptives, and serum lipid and lipoprotein levels in children of a total community. Presented at the Am. Heart Assn.
meeting, Miami Beach, Fla., Nov.17-20, Circulation 62:111-270, 1980.
- 3. Sklov, M., Baugh, J.G., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Srinivassn, S.R., Voors, A.W.
and Berenson, G.S.: Cardiovascular risk factor variables and smoking behavior in children-The Bogalusa Heart Study. Presented by Dr. Webber at the A.n. Heart Assn. meeting, Miami Beach, Fla., Nov. 17-20, 1980. Circulation 62:111-339, 1980.
! 4. Hunter, S. MacD., Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M.C., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: A-B coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factor variables in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Presented by Dr. Berenson at the 30th Annual Science Session of the American College of Cardiology, SICA meeting, San Francisco, CA, March 15-19,1981. Am. J. Cardiol.,1981.
- 5. Watson, R.M., Hunter, S. MacD., Sklov, M.C., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.:
Informational and inferential beliefs associated with cigarette smoking behavior of children and adolescents: Bogalusa Heart Study. Southern Sociological Society:
Section on Social Epidemiology, Louisville, KY, April 8-10, 1981.
- 6. Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Baugh, J.G., Sklov, M.C., Voors, A.W. and Berenson, G.S.: Epidemiologic assessment of the role of cigarette smoking behavior in coronary risk fcctor variables in children ages 12-17. The Bogalusa Heart Study.
International Epidemiological Assn., IXth Scientific Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1981.
- 7. Hunter, S. MacD., Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M.C., Webber, L.S., Watson, R.M. and Berenson, G.S.: Identifying type A coronary prone behavior in children and relationship with physiologic parameters: Bogalusa Heart Study. International Epidemiological Assn., IXth Scientific Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland,1981.
- 8. Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Wolf, T.M. and Berenson, G.S.: Perceived personal impediment to job attainment, type A behavior pattern and blood pressure levels in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am. Heart Assoc. 22nd Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology, San Antonio, TX, March 5-7,1982. In_ CVD Epidemiology Newsletter 31:93, 1982.
PR ESENTATIONS:
- 1. H mter, Saundra MacD.: A sociology of knowledge approach to women and change.
Paper read at the Midwest Sociological Society Meeting,1973.
- 2. Hunter, Saundra MacD., Powers, Edward and Bultena, Gordon: The Confidant: An anchor in a problematic world. Paper read at the Midwest Sociological Society Meeting,1973.
- 3. Hunter, Saundra MacD.: Socio-demographic profile of female household heads in Iowa.
Paper read at the Midwest Sociological Society Meeting,1974.
- 4. Hunter, Saundra MacD. and Callaghan, John O.: Conceptual, theoretical and empirical considerations for constructing socialindicators of health. Paper presented at the Southwestern Sociological Association, Dallas, Texas, April 7-10,1976.
- 5. Hunter, Saundra MacD. and Callaghan, John O.: The relationship between life-events, A-B personality type, fatalism, and subjective health assessment. Presented at the l Ninth World Congress of Sociology, Upsalla, Sweden, August,1978.
- 6. Hunter, Saundra MacD., Webber, Larry S., Baugh, Janet G. and Berenson, Gerald S.:
Social learning effects on trial and adoption of cigarette smoking in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Society of Behavioral Medicine, New York, November, 1980.
l
- 7. Hunter, Saundra MacD., Webber, L.S., Baugh, J.G., Sklov, M.C., Voors, A.W. and Berenson, G.S.: Epidemiologic assessment of the role of cigarette smoking behavior in coronary risk factor variables in children ages 12-17. The Bogalusa Heart Study. International Epidemiological Association. IXth Scientific Meeting.
Edinburgh, Scotland, August,1981.
I \
4 .
- 8. Hunter, S. MacD., Identifying type a coronary prone behavior in children and relationship with physiologic parameters. 'Ihe Bogalusa Heart Study. International Epidemiological Association. IX Scientific Meeting. Edinburgh, Scotland, August, 1981.
- 9. Watson, R.M., Hunter, S. MacD., Sklov, M.C., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.:
Informational and inferential beliefs associated with cigarette smoking behavior of children and adolescents. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Southern Sociological Society:
Section on Social Epidemiology,1981.
- 10. Watson, R.M., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Purtle, V.S. and Berenson, G.S.:
j Variables affecting cigarette smoking beliefs among children and adolescents: The i
Bogalusa Heart Study. American Sociological Association,1982.
PUBLICATIONS RESEARCH MONOGRAPHS:
, 1973 Wilcox, Leslie D.; McIntosh, William Alex; Byrnes, Kerry, J.; Callaghan, John; Hunter, Saundra M.; Kim, Song-Min; James, Rowena. A Methodology for Indicators of Social Development. Report 2: An Analysis d Selected A.I.D.
OperationalIndicators and Concepts. Sociology Report No.116. Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
1974 Wilcox, Leslie D.; Callaghan, John; Byrnes, Kerry J.; Hunter, Saundra M.; Kim, SoJ;;-Min. A Methodology for Indicators of Social Development. Report 4.
Ilealth Sector Information Bystem. Sociology Report No.121. Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
j JOURNALS:
- 1. Hunter, S.M., Frerichs, R.R., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Social status and I
cardiovascular disease risk factor variables in children: The Bogalusa Heart Study.
J. Chronic Dis. 32:441, 1979.
- 2. Wolf, T.M., Hunter, S.M. and Webber, L.S.: Psychosocial measures and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. J. Psychol. 101:39, 1979.
1 3. Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Cigarette smoking and tobacco usage behavior in children and adolescents-The Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev. Med.
9:701, 1980.
- 4. Wolf, T.M., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Self-concept, locus of control, goal blockage, and coronary-prone behavior pattern in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study. J. General Psychol. 105:13, 1981.
1
- 5. Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M. C. , Wenzyl, P.A., Hunter, S. MacD. and Berenson, G.S.:
i Validation of a measure of type A behavior pattern in children: Bogalusa Heart Study. Child Develop. 53:126, 1982.
- 6. Webber, L.S., Hunter, S. MacD.: Baugh, J.G., Srinivasan, S.R., Sklov, M.C. and
- Berenson, G.S.
- The interaction of cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive use, and
- cardiovascular risk factor variables in children
- The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am. J.
Pub. Health. 72:266, 1982.
- 7. Voors, A.W., Srinivasan, S.R., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Sklov M.C. and Berenson, G.S.: Smoking, oral contraceptives, and serum lipid and lipoprotein levels in children of a total biracial community. Prev. Med. 11:1, 1982.
- 8. Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S., Baugh, J.G. and Berenson, G.S.: Soalal learning effects on trial and adoption of cigarette smoking in children: 'Ihe Bogalusa Heart Study. Prev. Med. 11:29, 1982.
- 9. Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M.C., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Factor analytic study of the children's Nowicki-Strickland locus of control scale. Educa-tional and Psychological Measurement 42:333,1982.
- 10. Voors, A.W., Sklov, M., Wolf, T.M., Hunter, S.M. and Berenson, G.S.: Cardiovascular risk factors in children and coronary related behavior. In Promoting Adolescent Health: A Dialogue on Research and Practice, (Coates, T., Petersen, A. and Perry, C., eds.) Academic Press, New York,1982, pp. 281-304.
- 11. Hunter, S. MacD., Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M.C., Webber, L.S., Watson, R.B. and Berenson, G.S.: Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and cardiovascular risk factor variables in children and adolescents: The Bogalusa Heart Study. J. Chron. Dis.
35:613-621, 1982.
- 12. Baugh, J.G., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Developmental trends of first cigarette smoking experience of children-The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am. J. Pub. Health 72:1161-1164, 1982.
- 13. Hunter, S.M. and Bradley-Springer, L.: A model of the diffusion and adoption of preventive health habits. SCOR-A Working Paper.
- 14. Berenson, G.S., Frank, G.C., Hunter, S.M., Srinivasan, S.R., Voors, A.W. and Webber, L.S.: Cardiovascular risk factors in children-Should they concern the pediatrician.
Am. J. Dis. Child. 136:855-862, 1982.
- 15. Wolf, T.M., Sklov, M.C., Hunter, S. MacD., Webber, L.S. and Berenson, G.S.: Factor analytic study of the Piers-Harris children's self concept scale. J. Personal.
Assess. In press.
BOOK:
- 1. Hunter, S. MacD. and Gehringer, Gerald: Research Methods for Family Physicians, Addison-Wesley Publications, Menlo Park, CA., projected publication 1983.
Revised: 10/19/82
STATE OF LOUISIANA PARISH OF ORLEANS BEFORE ME, the undersigned, did appear Saundra MacD. Hunter, Ph.D., and did declare on oath that the Direct Testimony provided is true and correct to the best of her knowledge, information, and boliof.
- 4. )G.t.
Saundra MacD. Hunter, Ph.D Sworn to and subscribed before me, Notary, this 26th day of Jcnuary, 1983.
' -) *, j
- . f-.
', /',7 t i/
'..( '
(
{
BTERv PUsETE "-~~~~~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board In the Matter of )
) Docket No. 50-382 LOUISI ANA POWER !< LIGHT CO. )
) January 26, 1983 (Waterford Steam Electric Station )
Unit 3)
CERTIFIQATE QE SE8k' ICE I hereby certify that on January 26, 1983, I mailed the direct testinony of Sharon Duplessis and Dr. Saundra MacD. Hunter concerning the evacuation brochure to the f ollowino Service Li st encepting Bruce Churchill who was hand served through a prony. Sheldon Wolfe and Sherw2.n Tur6 were served by Enpress Mail. All others w . served by First Class Mail. -
uary L.
roesco - jy'
- - / '
N
SEFjy{CE LISI
<l>Sheldon J. Wol f e Chairman. Atomic Safety and Licensing Daard U.S. Fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
<2>Dr. Harry Foreman Adminiutrative Judge University of Minnesota Mi nneapol i s , Mf1 55455
<0)Dr. Walter Jordan Administrative Judge 891 West Guter Drive Dal Ridge. Tf4 37830
<4)Sherwin E. Turt Office of the E::ecutive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Rcqulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 c5 V.tomic Safety and Licens.ing Board Panel U.C Nuc1 ear Reuul ator v Commi ssion Washington, DC 20555
<6) Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatorv Commission Washington, DC 20555
<7) Docketing & Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
<R>Druce Churchill Shaw. Pittman. Potts & Trowridge 1800 M Street Washington, DC 20036
<9)Dri an Cassi dy Federal Emergency Management Agency 442 J.W. McCormack Boston, MA 02109