|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20234D0961987-07-0101 July 1987 Affidavit of DW Cassel.* Affidavit Re Intervenors Rorem,Et Al Motion to Reopen Record to Admit Late Filed Contention on Financial Qualification.Related Info Encl.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20214N0521987-05-28028 May 1987 Affidavit of Mj Wallace.* Affidavit of Mj Wallace Re Startup & Initial Criticality of Unit 1.W/Certificate of Svc ML20214N0471987-05-28028 May 1987 Affidavit of Jc Bukovski.* Affidavit of Jc Bukovski Re Delay in Startup,Testing & Commercial Operation of Unit 1 ML20205R9661987-04-0101 April 1987 Affidavit of at Simile Re Insp of Lk Comstock Files of Superceded Revs to Welding Procedures & Current & Past Procedure Qualification Records for Period of 841109-851231 ML20205R9981987-04-0101 April 1987 Affidavit of Jt Louden Re Review of Lk Comstock Welding Procedures,Including Specs & Supporting Procedure Qualification Records in Effect from 841109-851231.Joint Welding Procedure Specs Encl ML20214C4131986-11-12012 November 1986 Affidavit of DE Gilberts Re Enforcement Action 86-164 & NRC 861022 Order to Show Cause Concerning Use of Radios in Control Rooms ML20211H4661986-10-27027 October 1986 Affidavit of Nondisclosure of RO Wolf Re 851206 Protective Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20209G3531986-09-0909 September 1986 Affidavit of B Mann Supporting Applicant 860818 Motion for Authorization of Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing ML20209G3771986-09-0909 September 1986 Affidavit of Rn Gardner Re Region III Intent to Ensure Compliance W/License Conditions Invoked by License Issued as Result of Motion for Authorization of Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20209G3651986-09-0808 September 1986 Affidavit of Wl Brooks Supporting Applicant 860818 Motion for Authorization of Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing ML20203L1741986-08-19019 August 1986 Affidavit of Rj Slember Supporting Applicant Motion for Authorization for Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20214K7761986-08-18018 August 1986 Affidavit of Tj Maiman Supporting Util Request for Authorization for Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing. Rj Slember Unexecuted Affidavit Encl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20214K7611986-08-18018 August 1986 Affidavit of Kd Brienzo Re Special Measures for Fuel Loading & Precritical Testing Activities ML20199K8871986-07-0101 July 1986 Affidavit of KT Kostal in Response to Motion to Admit Late Filed Contention on Overstress of Structural Columns. Controlled Program Implemented to Assure That Structural Steel Not Overstressed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20203N1331986-04-29029 April 1986 Affidavit of Ds Hefter Ack Receipt & Understanding of Encl Agreed Protective Order Re Protected Info ML20141D7981986-04-0202 April 1986 Affidavit of Tj Maiman Re Braidwood Unit 1 Scheduled Fuel Load Date ML20140D6841986-03-20020 March 1986 Affidavit of Mi Miller Re Torrey Pines Technology,Inc Reinsp of safety-related Mechanical Equipment.Factual Matters in Marcus Assessment Have Not Been Withheld from Discovery Process.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140C6891986-03-20020 March 1986 Affidavit of Mi Miller Re Preparation for Evidentiary Hearings on Contentions 1.A,6.A,10.A,12.A,13.A,10B & 11C. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20214C5261986-02-15015 February 1986 Affidavit of Wj Kropp Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 10F.Related Info Encl ML20214C3301986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Jm Jacobson Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 3.C.Related Info Encl ML20214C6761986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of JW Muffett Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 14.B.4.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214C6281986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rd Schulz Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 14.B.3.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20214C6061986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Pr Pelke Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 14.B.2.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20214C5961986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rd Schulz Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 14.B.1.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20214C5831986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of JW Muffett Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 13.B.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20214C5801986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rn Gardner Supporting NRC Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 12.J.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20214C5691986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rn Gardner Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 12.F.Related Info Encl ML20214C5141986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Kd Ward Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 9.D.Related Info Encl ML20214C4961986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Kd Ward Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 9.C.Related Info Encl ML20214C4681986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Jm Jacobson Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 9.A.Related Info Encl ML20214C4511986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rd Schulz Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 6.I.Related Info Encl ML20214C4391986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rd Schulz Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 6.G.Related Info Encl ML20214C5521986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rn Gardner Supporting Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 12.E.Related Info Encl ML20214C4091986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Rd Schulz Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 6.F.Related Info Encl ML20214C3341986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of JW Muffett Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 5.A.Related Info Encl ML20214C3581986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of Wj Kropp Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 5B.Related Info Encl ML20214C3801986-02-13013 February 1986 Affidavit of JW Muffett Supporting Staff Response to Applicant 851220 Motion for Summary Disposition of Rorem QA Subcontention 5.C.Related Info Encl ML20137A9131986-01-15015 January 1986 Affidavit of J Gallo Re 851206 Protective Order.Receipt of Order Ack.Protection from Discrimination Emphasized for Util Employees Participating in Proceedings.Related Correspondence ML20137J1251986-01-10010 January 1986 Affidavit of Ld Butterfield Re Respiratory Protection. Statement Re Use of Handkerchief Deleted from Emergency Planning Brochures Due to Technical Inappropriateness. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20138M6501985-12-19019 December 1985 Affidavit of Mj Wallace Re QA Contention Concerning Util Responsiveness to QA Audit Findings & NRC Noncompliance & Nonconformance Repts.Corrective Actions Implemented on Schedule to Achieve Fuel Load Date.W/Certificate of Svc ML20138P5391985-12-18018 December 1985 Affidavit of G Wegner Re Rorem Offer of Proof.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20138N5011985-12-18018 December 1985 Affidavit of G Wenger Re Rorem Offer of Proof Concerning Seven Issues Questioning Whether Certain Subjs Adequately Addressed by State of Il Plan for Radiological Accidents ML20137X1001985-12-0202 December 1985 Affidavit of Js Fairow Re Seven Emergency Planning Issues Raised by Intervenor 851025 Offer of Proof.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137C3121985-11-20020 November 1985 Affidavit of Rv Seltmann Supporting Revised Responses to Rorem Interrogatories 13-16 & Contention Item 6.B.5 Re Qa. Related Correspondence ML20137C3291985-11-20020 November 1985 Affidavit of If Dewald Supporting Revised Responses to Rorem Interrogatories 13-16 & Contention Item 6.B.5 Re Qa.Related Correspondence ML20137C3421985-11-20020 November 1985 Affidavit of TE Quaka Supporting Revised Responses to Rorem Interrogatories 13-16 & Contention Item 6.B.5 Re Qa.Related Correspondence ML20133F5361985-10-0808 October 1985 Affidavit of Jg Keppler Re 850621 Util late-filed Amended QA Contention.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F5971985-10-0202 October 1985 Affidavit of Rv Seltmann Supporting Util Response to Specific Interrogatories 58 & 59 Filed by Intervenor as Part of QA Contention.Related Correspondence ML20132C4381985-09-23023 September 1985 Affidavit of Mj Wallace Re Impact of Intervenor QA Contention on Project Const.Critical Path Activities Delayed 3 to 4 Months by QA Contention.Continued Litigation Will Delay Const Further & Elevate Cost ML20133F5931985-09-19019 September 1985 Affidavit of JW Gieseker Supporting Util Response to Specific Interrogatories 58 & 59 Filed by Intervenor as Part of QA Contention.Related Correspondence 1987-07-01
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149H0301997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communications Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20248D2831989-09-28028 September 1989 Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q2661989-09-26026 September 1989 Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20248C8751989-09-13013 September 1989 Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl ML20246C7141989-08-18018 August 1989 Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 ML20246K4801989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20244B3241989-04-10010 April 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20247A2971989-04-0404 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246M2771989-03-20020 March 1989 Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321 B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel1989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel ML20246N9471989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20236B4641989-03-0808 March 1989 Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague ML20235T3581989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program ML20235V8541989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint ML20235T1861989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989 Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices ML20235L5921989-02-0606 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation ML20247R4091988-12-31031 December 1988 Transcript of Commission 881221 Press Conference in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-31 ML20196F5981988-12-0101 December 1988 Notice of Hearing.* Notifies That Hearing to Be Held in CP Application Proceedings on 881221 Cancelled & Rescheduled to Commence on 890104.Served on 881202 ML20196F5831988-12-0101 December 1988 Memorandum Memoralizing 881129 Telcon.* Applicant & NRC Agreed to Submit Joint Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Served on 881202 ML20196A5991988-12-0101 December 1988 Transcript of 881201 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Pp 143-152 ML20206M9181988-11-22022 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881121.* Discusses Board 881121 Telcon W/Counsel for Parties Re Prehearing & Scheduling Matters.Served on 881123 ML20206J3701988-11-21021 November 1988 Transcript of 881121 Telcon in Bethesda,Md Re Alchemie. Pp 70-100 ML20206M5321988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program ML20195H0331988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug Testing JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20195H0111988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing ML20206C6321988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C6131988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C3271988-11-10010 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881109.* Licensee Request to DOE to Extend Deadline for Receipt of CPs Until 890131 Not Officially Passed Upon.Further Prehearing Telcon Scheduled for 881121.Served on 881114 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
AFFIDAVIT COMMONWEALTH OF FLORIDA:
COUNTY OF ORANGE: ss Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared l A. R. Collier, who, being by me duly sworn according to law, deposes and says that he is authorized to execute this Affidavit on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (" Westinghouse") and that the averments of fact set forth in this Affidavit are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief:
?n /usc 0 lbe o -> # ,
"U A. R. Collier, Manager MMA8.M9A Date Commercial Operations Steam Turbine Generator Division iTARY PUBUC STATE OF FLORIDA AT LARGE sy enuamamWW EXRHES SEPT.11. W noiseen amous> mempt me.
8212070187 821129 gDRADOCK 05000454 PDR 39SE011
, 'ig (2)
(1) I am Manager, Commercial Operations, Steam Turbine Generator Division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation and as such, I have been specifically delegated the function of reviewing the proprietary information ESJght to be withheld from public disclosure in connection with nuclear power plant licensing or rulemaking proceedings, and am authorized to apply for its withholding on behalf of the Westinghouse Steam Turbine Generator Division.
(2) I am making this Affidavit in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations and in conjunctic.n with the Westinghouse application for withholding accompanying this Affidavit.
(3) I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Westinghouse in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
(4) Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration of the Commission in determining whether the infor-mation sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.
395E011
- _______ _ - __ _ ___ i
(3)
(i) The information sought to be withheld from public dis-closure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
(ii) The information is of a type customarily held in con-fidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for deter-mining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or poten-tial competitive advantage, as follows:
(a) The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
39SE011
(4)
(b) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, struc-ture, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
(c) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expen-diture of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
(d) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
(e) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
(f) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
(g) It is not the property of Westinghouse, but must be treated as proprietary by Westinghouse according to agreements with the owner.
395E011
, (5)
~
(h) Public disclosure of this information would allow unfair and untruthful judgments on the performance and reliability of Westinghouse equipment compo-nents and improper comparison with similar compo-nents made by competitors.
There are sound policy reasons behind the Westinghouse system which include the following:
(a) The use of such information by Westinghouse gives Westinghouse a competitive advantage over its competitors. It is, therefore, withheld from disclosure to protect the Westinghouse competitive position.
(b) It is information which is marketable in many ways. The extent to which such information is available to competitors diminishes the Westinghouse ability to sell products and services involving the use of the information.
(c) Use by our competitor would put Westinghouse at a competitive disadvantage by reducing his expendi-ture of resources at our expense.
39SE011
(6)
(d) Each component of proprietary information pertinent to a particular competitive advantage is poten-tially as valuable as the total competitive ad-vantage. If competitors acquire components of proprietary information, any one component may be l the key to the entire puzzle, thereby depriving Westinghouse of a competitive advantage.
t j (iii) The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence and, under the provisions of 10 CFR Section 2.790, it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
j (iv) The information is not available in public sources to the best of our knowledge and belief.
- (v) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal is that which is contained in revised FSAR information attached to Commonwealth Edison Company's
- letter of August 18, 1982, from T. R. Tramm to H. R.
Denton and to Commonwealth Edison Company's letter of September 2, 1982, from T. R. Tramm to H. R. Denton.
i 39SE011
(7)
The information enables Westinghouse to do one or more of the following:
l 4
(a) Develop test inputs and procedures to satisfac-torily verify the design of Westinghouse supplied equipment.
1 (b) Assist its customers to obtain licenses.
Further, the information has substantial commercial value 1
as follows:
(a) Westinghouse can sell the use of this information to customers.
1 (b) Westinghouse uses the information to verify the design of equipment which is sold to customers.
(c) Westinghouse can sell services based upon the
\
- experience gained and the test equipment and methods developed.
i l
Public disclosure of this information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of I
Westinghouse because it would enhance the ability of
! competitors to design, manufacture, verify, and sell electrical equipment for commercial turbine-generators l
395E011 i
_ . _ . . _ . . , - - _ _ . - . _ , _ , . , _ . , . . . . . ..-....r._ ..
r
~
without commensurate expenses. Also, public disclosure of the information would enable others having the same or similar equipment to use the information to meet NRC requirements for licensing documentation without pur-chasing the right to use the information.
The development of the equipment described in part by the information is the result of many years of development by Westinghouse and the expenditure of a considerable sum of money.
This could only be duplicated by a competitor if he were to invest similar sums of money and provided he had the appropriate talent available and could somehow obtain the requisite experience.
Further the deponent sayeth not, i
- 395E011 l
_. _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . - , . . _ _ _ . - . , _ _ . . - , . _ . , _ . _ _ . , _ _ _ . _ , _