ML20012D990

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 900216 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-461/89-38.Corrective Actions:Maint Supervision Added Critical Points to Existing Maint Work Requests & Preventive Maint Activities & Training Program Updated
ML20012D990
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/19/1990
From: Spangenberg F
ILLINOIS POWER CO.
To: Davis A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
U-601618, NUDOCS 9003290192
Download: ML20012D990 (4)


Text

p7: v: ; _ 3--.

?

g-t 4t ps.

f Wh

( W) ' ., -U 601618-1: ;L42-90(03 19)-LP gj 4F.190

/LLIN0/8' POWER 00MPANY March 19, 1990

.v

( . ,

Docket No. 50-461 b , 'Mr. A. B. D' avis-Regional Administrator.

Region III- . .;..

, U.S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission 9:e 799 Roosevelt Road

, Glen Ellyn, Illinois .60137 1

Subj ect: . Response to the Notice of Violation;in Inspection Reoort 50-461/89038' dated February 16; 1990 3

Dear,

Mr. Davis:

. ThisIletter provides: the Illinois Power Company '(IP) response .to t .jp ;the Notice of Violation in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection-Report 50.461/89038.' The Notice of Violation concerns ~two examples'of-

~

, failure to document interna 11 cleanliness of a piping system. .The-

-attachment to this letter discusses the actions specified to. resolve; this-issue.

.IP believes that the information contained in the attachment'to this letter adequately resolves this issue. y

? Sincerely yours,

[

ch

. F. A. Sp genb g, II j

[] Manager - Licen ing an Safety

. JAB /krm Attachment .

d cc: NRC Clinton Licensing Project Manager NRC Resident Office

') /

Ii i; - Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety l '

9003290192 900319 O PDR ADOCK 05000461 o PDC &

, MAR 21 1990 mob __

~ ~

R" .- . , 1 i:

-I i

'Att:chment td'U 601618

-. . Response to:the Notice of Violation in Inspection Report 50-461/89038 h The Notice of Violation states in part: ,

"On January 18, 1990, the Division I, 16 cylinder diesel's heat-exchanger was opened for maintenance and the "as found" condition was not documented nor attached to the work documents. ,

on January 31, 1990 [ sic),' valve 1SX005C in.the shutdown service water system was replaced during maintenance and the results of a visual inspection performed before final closure of the system were not documented nor attached to the work documents."

1. Background and Cause of the Violation While performing Maintenance Work Request (MWR) D07323 to clean heat '

exchanger (HX) tubes on the Division I Diesel Generator Heat Exchanger (DG RX) in support of eddy-current testing, maintenance personnel did not document the "as found" cleanliness. MWR D07323 referenced CPS .

1019.02, System Cleanliness, but did not include a-job step to document "as found" cleanliness as reqlired by the procedure. As a result, t maintenance failed to documer.t the "as found" cleanliness. The NRC

  • resident staff discussed tbts procedural violation with the Director-Maintenance. Following Unis discussion, maintenance issued Condition '

Report (CR) 1-90-01 059 on January 19, 1990, for failure to document the "as found" condition of the HX.

On January 30, 1990, valve 1SX005C was removed and replaced (MWR l- D08216), and the Division III DG-HX was opened for inspection. The valve replacement was performed using a freeze. seal to isolate the valve. Upon removal of 1SX005C, maintenance personnel documented on the

, MWR that the "as found" condition of the pipe was. unacceptable.

E However, a determination was made to not clean the pipe because of the; risk associated with the freeze seal. Valve 1SX005C was replaced and the freeze seal released. .CR 1-90-01-090 was issued on January 30, 1990, to-document the failure of the piping to meet system cicanliness requirements upon system breech ("as found"). In addition, maintenance personnel who inspected the DG RX documented the unacceptable, "as found" condition of the RX and the inlet / outlet piping of the HX on the

'MWR. CR 1-90-01-087 was issued on January 30, 1990, to document the failure of the RX to meet system cleanliness requirements upon system breech ("as found"). While maintenance documented system cleanliness upon system breech ("as found"), they did not document a closcout inspection ("as left") when the valve was installed and when the end flanges were replaced on the HX.

During management discussions with the NRC resident staff it became evident that maintenance had not understood the full requirements of CPS 1019.02.

Maintenance reviewed these MWRs and identified that maintenance personnel clearly understood the requirement to perform inspections of the "as.found" cleanliness (required by CPS 1019.02 paragraph 8.2.1) but not the requirement to document the inspection results. In the first instance on January 18, 1990, maintenance personnel performed the (1)

~ _

m. ,

_Att:chmint to U-601618 ,

- ' . . Response _to the Notice of Violation in  !

Inspection Report 50-461/89038' inspection but failed to document the.results because the MVR did not ,

. include a job' step requiring them to do so. In the second' instance, maintenance personnel documented the "as found" conditions. However,

  • they did not document the "as left" conditions because'the MWR did not, include a job step' requiring them to do so. j This review also indicated'that maintenance personnel were aware of CPS 1019.02 paragraph 9.1, " Acceptance Criteria for Maintenance and  ;

Operational. Evolutions", which requires: "Before final closure of a system after. opening for maintenance or operational evolution, a visual inspection shall be performed," and of paragraph 9.2, " Acceptance Criteria for Modifications" which requires: "Immediately prior to final

closure of a system after opening for modification, a visual' inspection shall be performed." However, they overlooked paragraph 9.3 which requires the "as left" cleanliness conditions of paragraphs.9.1 and 9.2 to be documented, an it did not have a separate title and appeared to be ,

part of paragraph 9.2. This oversight resulted in the requirements of-L paragraph 9.3 being missed because the. work being performed was not related to a modification and therefore paragraph 9.2 did not apply.

This caused confusion on the requirement to document the "as left" condition.

II. Corrective Actions Taken and Results Achieved Maintenance' supervision added " critical points" to existing MWRs and Preventive Maintenance activities (PMs) currently in the field for work to ensure supervisors are directly involved in verifying and documenting system cleanliness. Maintenance has revised CR 1-90-01-059 to include the failure to document "as left" cleanliness. Maintenance personnel were1 briefed on verifying and documenting system cleanliness. CRs 1 01 059, 1-90-01-087 and 1-90 01-090 are to be dispositioned to include appropriate corrective actions to correct the specific conditions identified.

III. Corrective Actions Taken to Preclude Recurrence Maintenance planners were instructed to add job steps which require documentation of system cleanliness verifications for both system breech

("as found") and system closure ("as left") in MWRs and PMs which require the opening of a system that is listed in CPS 1019.02. CPS 1019.02 will be revised to clarify procedural requirements for documenting cleanliness to minimize or prevent human performance errors.

This procedure revision is scheduled for completion by June 1,1990.

The training program for maintenance personnel will be updated to incorporate the revised CPS 1019.02 and emphasize the purpose of system cleanliness and the proper methods for maintaining, verifying and documenting system cleanliness. This training is scheduled for completion by July 15, 1990.

Additionally, Maintenance personnel will be briefed annually on the importance of maintaining, verifying and documenting system cleanliness.

(2) 9

.1+

Attachmsnt to U-601618 E

.- ' .- Response to the Notice of Violation in.

Inspection Report 50 461/89038 The Plant Manager has counselled the Director Maintenance on the importance of understanding NRC concerns and ensuring an adequate solution is implemented.

IV. Date When Full Comn11ance Will Be Achieved Illinois Power company will be in full compliance upon the completion of Maintenance personnel training on July 15, 1990.

(3)

_ _ _ _ _ - _. _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _