ML19332C624

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 89-003-00:on 891023,measured Leakage Rate Exceeded Tech Specs Limit While Performing Surveillance Test Sp 2136. Caused by Wear of Grafoil Packing Due to High Frequency of Door Usage.Test Procedures modified.W/891122 Ltr
ML19332C624
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/1989
From: Hunstad A, Parker T
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER-89-003-02, LER-89-3-2, NUDOCS 8911280357
Download: ML19332C624 (5)


Text

p.

fm ;s O- 4 y

414 Nicollet Mall Minneapole, Menosota 654011927 Telephone (612) 3345500 i

November 22, 1989 10 CFR Part 50 Section 50.73 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR CENERATING PIANT Docket Nos. 50 282 License Nos. DPR 42 50 306 DPR 60 Failure of Unit 2 Maintenance Airlock To Pass the Volumetric Leakage Rate Test The Licensee Event Report for this occurrence is attached.

Please. contact us if you require additional information related to this event.

9 W Thomas M Parker

' Manager Nuclear Suppore Services c: Regional Administrator Region III, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, NRC MPCA Attn: Dr J W Ferman Attachment

-8911280357 891122 PDR S

ADOCK 05000306 PDC ik i

1

  • . 8e ~4 mac.echu ses u s. tucL tta it a vLitGY camissi!N APenovtD 0us No 31604104 t uttit$ et30/92

' (11 uattD SURCEN paa etspoNst to cou*ty atM TMis LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LERI E#"T.'ts'Uc*la'o'.!'c'fvIltNs't ultl s0? i7EcT/ci

^;'!v"i?o"." c"'J'M "J,"J ".'!M o',? R M,l"'Jo' G D'a'Au*i""i f'!G'!"1.'"isJJ'"DC%l""

, . .C ,6,t , ...t .. ox.n - t. o, .ac...

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 2 0 ;5ioiolo;3;0;6 ilorl0 4 1

s tl ** Failure of Unit 2 Maintenance Airlock To Pass the Volumetric 'cakage Rate Test t yt he Oat t its L*n Nvuela is I atront Datt sti otMin F ACIL1titt INv0LvtD tal Day vtan 68 0gf,,'j ;"k -a,ej,,s, y;. wohim Dat vtah 'aci6iv v nawes 00cetti Nuw$this)

MONt:1 vtan Prairie Island Unit 1 ol5Io1oto1 2 8 12 1

~ ~

1l0 2l3 8 9 8l 9 0l0l3 0 l0 1l1 2l2 8l 9

. ., .,,..,- .,nii o is to ic i o, I i tais i.Ontsove.intoeuniv =tt05 I. 0 vial t=n 0Fut.ng ,Ca

,,e.,,,,,

MOOR mi N n ,,,, u ,, ,,,,,,,,,,n,,, ,,,,,,,

H 406tsH1880 60 30tell11 to.73tell3Het 73.?1tal P

to 3tisitti 60 73 sPRHve.l Mt .se eye,

tipi , , M estteH1Hal _

, 90 ele 6sHitt.ial

. . H, n,.I

{ to.78talt2 Hit n non.,

to 13:eH2Hvie Hal

.0 n ..H. H.,

J6448 M eAS eHileet to ?Soltitelil 90 73Lall311si 4tClN886CONTACTpba taisatm(131

.1pt it LtPMONE NUMBE R ant a C004 Arne A Hunstad, Staff Engineer 6 ,1 , 2 3 ,8 , 8 , ,1,1,2 ,1 COMPLitt ONE LINI POR B&CM C0mPOktN, f alLv98 DESC9tBSD IN TMil RIPORT 4131 as AC- ont E ,

CAUS$ Sv$ttu (OMPONtNT " " , ' C' "h*O em Cault Svtt t w Cowe0NtNT ng*p hp,a X B;D SE  ! i At t X999 i i 1 X i ; i  ! i i i l l I l Jl 1 I i i I I I MONtM Dav vlam durettut NT AL StPont (**EC10 D t141 SvDwiE$ ION q vts or,, n . svecuo svou,wCN omo D) NO l l 1 n.Ctit , ,= w.,...-, ... -.,,-.. nei On October 23, 1989, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power. IJhile performing the surveillance test Sp 2136, Volumetric Leakage Rate Test of Unit 2 Maintenance Airlock, the measured leakage rate exceeded the Technical Specifications' lin:it.

The leak was determined to be through the seal of a handwheel shaft at the outer door. Soap testing at the inner door revealed no visible leakage. The outboard Grafoil packing was repaired by tightening a loose packing nut. The surveillance test Sp 2136 was then successfully completed with an acceptable leakage rate.

Cause of the event was the wear of the Grafoil packing due to the high frequency of door usage during refueling shutdowns followed by relaxation of the packing during periods of non. usage, coupled with the inadequate preventive maintenance of the packing because of inadequate procedures.

The preventive corrective action will be to modify the containment airlocks surveillance test procedures prior to the next refueling; outage. The containment airlock volumetric Icakage rate surveillance test procedures will be revised to require inspection for proper adjustment of packing nuts on door shaf t seals prior to startup following an extended outage. Repairs would only be allowed provided "As Found" test data is obtained.

u c e- =. .. ei

h , *- .

n, g<

i- ,

f y 8. NUCLE AR R50VLATORY COnehuSEiON asse poemi 3ssA APPRO D OH NOM 108 i 66404 g ariats er3042 i LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) $s",",'f,*,o',.v"gg,","o"'!;%"n,T* .cf**,y, T,",i",'!

TEXT CON 11NUATION  ??,*".',",'o',%','",';"c,Mp',M5'c'O,'!E",' "T,"f!  !

P&PlmwO as u TsDN 3 60 C IC 09 M&h&GlutNT AND $UDG87,vrA&MINGTON,DC 30603.

F ACILITY ,eaast 41) DOCkli hWMSLR LII L8R HUM 8th16) PAGE (Il h n *a " W,' .' '  : t'a*.,T:

~

Prairie Island Unit 2 o;s;o;o;o;3;O;6 8;9 0 l0l 3 009 0;2 or 0 j4 ,

TEXT L mov apsse a suoisor, ess, empenne eWC Arm Jaa'as 4th ,

EVENT DPSCRIPTION .

f i

on October 23, 1989. Unit 2 was operating at 100% power. While performing the surveillance test SP 2136, Volumetric Leakage Rate Test of Unit 2 Maintenance i Airlock, the measured leakage rate exceeded the Technical Specifications' limit.  !

The outer door was inspected and audible leakage was heard through'the lower handwheel shaft.

The seals (EIIS Component Code: SEAb) on the Maintenance Airlock handwheel shaf ts were replaced on February 11, 1988. Grafoil packing has been used for the shaft  !

seals since the . early 1980's in order to meet environmental qualification requirements. The outboard seals were proven satisfactory on February 17, 1988, i August 8, 1988, and December 12, 198b.

During the refueling shutdown of March and April of 1989, this airlock experienced a high number of cycles. This caused additional wear on the Grafoil ,

packing. On April 18, 1989 the outboard seals were again proven satisfactory It is not known if the packing was adjusted, as was normal practice, prior to this test.

On October 23, 1989, the leakage was identified during the surveillance test.

At this time, the Maintenance Airlock (EIIS Component Code: AL) was locked, chained, and a Secure Card hung. Shortly thereafter, a containment entry was  ;

made through the Personnel Airlock. The inner door and handwheel shaft seals l

.of the Maintenance Airlock were then visually. inspected and soap tested and it was determined that there was no leakage through the inner door. '

CAUSE OF THE EVENT The cause of this event is believed to be that the adjusting of the packing on the outdoor seal was not required by plant procedures. It was previously known that the packing needed to be adjusted following periods of extended use and it was routine for plant maintenance personnel to make this adjustment prior to the last test of the airlock prior to startup from cold shutdown. However, the adj ustment was not required by procedure, nor the method for adj ustment

, specified, nor the adjustment documented. Therefore, it is not known if the l

adjustment was performed at the end of the last refueling outage in April 1989 or, if it was performed, whether it was done adequately. The high use caused  ;

pscking wear and this did not affect the sealing capability of the packing until j

the packing had relaxed over the period of time between April 18 and October 23, j 1989. Thus, it is believed that the root cause is the failure to adequately perform the necessary maintenance due to the deficient procedure.

l.

l

1

.. c

,.. E- ,,

L: OhtsStaa U.S. NWCLEAR D 8OWLATDRV Commaastom t z,this at30rB2 LlcENSEE EVENT REPOli (LER) g^i',D

,, o',y;gy, ige 0'!3"li,T'.,*f77.T.",'."% ,

TEXT CONTINUATIC N 2"".',*,'o'.*15'", aj 'rN',$'d.", *,'Li,M".' " MEN  !

Ult.','S".'on*."d'JEv"io"'E"jM"i805@ Uf 'c? i Of MAh&GIM4hT AND $WDGET,Ve&SM18f0f 0N. DC 30603.

D&Cs41tv hat.6 Og DOGR&T 4WM$th (2) LI A NUldeln ISD PAC' L33 in -

"Rt.t t' d'JJ.'f Prairfe Island Unit 2 ols;o;o;ol3;0;6 '8 ; 9 ._

0 l0 ) 3 ._

0l0 0;3 or 0 l4 rsrv a, . ..e , muw nn

, ANALYSIS OF THE EVENT .

l The measured Icakage rate for the initial "As Found" test was determined to be i 16,500 standard cubic _ centimeters per minute (SCC / Min). This exceeds the Technical Specification (TS 4.4) allowable value of 12,900 SCC / Min.

P Total containment allowable laakage for Type B and C testing (TS 4.4) was not exceeded as shown by the following:  ;

April 1989 Refueling Outage:  ;

Total Containment Leakate Type B and C Test .............................. 18,430 SCC / Min October 25, 1989 Six Month Surveillance:

Maintenance Airlock Type B Test ................. 16,500 SCC / Min Total Measured Leakage .......................... 34,S30 SCC / Min  ;

Total Containment Allowable Leakage Type B & C Tests (TS 4.4): 60% 1,............ 154,800 SCC / Min 1 Thus, the total measured leakage of 34,930 SCC / Min is less than the total containment allowable leakage of 154,800 SCC /!iin.

In addition, soap testing determined there was no leakage from the airlock inner door and shaft seals. Therefore, the potential for the airlock leakage to be released to the annulus would have been during a containment entry at the point in time when the inner door was open and the outer door was closed. In

-addition, 'a pressure differential across the outer door would have been necessary to create this leakage path. Any leakage would have been collected L and monitored via the shield building ventilation system.

l -In conclusion, based on the above, this event had no effect on the health and L safety of the public.

l l

l l

l .

, Y

. ', ;+4 i v4 aucit 2 w ayo. ,c = =.o= ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

l

._c vo t .,,.4 4 ..w,7  ;

UCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)- 'Sl",','!?o'#*@'"4M"o*'EE,"'tb,!!",'.i' .T."J"'!

TEXT CONTINUATION  !","o"4".'o',",lS',",Qi?J0*',115,'c'*'.'M '"' lM "*!

t a.t .wD ntNftsow 0 0 (Ck l' 0, naANAGtutest amo 300Gtt.walalMOTON, DC 20603. i

  • atsuty ha.st au DOCEtt Nuutt. tas gga muutta tei #A64 (31

,t.. bt1;'.'$  :

'tr*D o

Prairie Island Unit 2 o1610loIo13l0l6 8l9 -

0]O l 3 -

0 l0 014 0F 0 l4 :

'rarvw . ==c w .amawnn CORRECTIVE ACTION .

The cutboard Crafoil packing was repaired under a work request. The repair involved tightening the packing nuts on the lower outboard seal. The surveillance test, SP 2136, was successfully repeated with an acceptable leakage rate of 3,324 SCC / Min on October 25, 1989.

The containment airlock volumetric leakage rate surveillance test procedures will be revised to require inspection for proper adjustment of packing nuts on ,

door shaft seals prior to startup following an extended outage. The procedures

' will require appropriate readj ustu.ent if necessary. Repairs would only be allowed provided "As Found" test data is obtained. The revisions will be made prior.to the next refueling outage for the applicable unit.

FAILED COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION Chicago Bridge and Iron airlock; Grafoil packing, size 7/8" x 1 3/8" PREVIOUS SIMIIAR EVENTS Previous similar events were reported as Unit 2 Reportable Occurrences 83 04 and 83-20.

t l'

L l

l

\

c