Petition to Intervene Filed for Save Our Wetlands,Inc, & Oyster Shell Alliance,Inc.Requests That Applicant'S Operating License Be Disapproved or Subj to Addl Safeguards. W/Encl Affidavits & Certificate of SvcML19269C547 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Waterford |
---|
Issue date: |
01/29/1979 |
---|
From: |
Fontana L AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 7902050295 |
Download: ML19269C547 (14) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20116G9431996-08-0707 August 1996 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re, Mods to Fitness-For-Duty Program Requirements TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20086D8841995-06-29029 June 1995 Comments on Proposed Rule Re, Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20085E5891995-06-0909 June 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control ML20080A1331994-10-21021 October 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy.Advises That Util of Belief That NRC Focus on Safety Significance in Insps & Enforcement Policy Can Be Achieved by Utilization of Risk Based Techniques ML20073M3261994-10-0303 October 1994 Comment on Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants ML20072B8521994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements.Licensee Believes Reduction in Amount of FFD Testing Warranted & Can Best Be Achieved in Manner Already Adopted by Commission ML20065P4121994-04-25025 April 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Rule Re Code & Stds Re Subsections IWE & Iwl.Expresses Deep Concern About Ramifications of Implementing Proposed Rule ML20058G6211993-12-0606 December 1993 Comment on Draft NUREG/BR-0058, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines,Rev 2. Concurs W/Numarc & Nubarg Comments ML20056F3481993-08-23023 August 1993 Comment Opposing NRC Draft GL 89-10,suppl 6 ML20058B6891993-05-0707 May 1993 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst to File W/Nrc Encl TS Change Request NPF-38-135 ML20058E0251990-10-12012 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML20055E9871990-06-29029 June 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Mod for fitness-for-duty Programs & Licensed Operators.Util Believes That High Stds of Conduct Will Continue to Be Best Achieved & Maintained by Program That Addresses Integrity ML19353B2241989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Endorses NUMARC Comments W3P89-0196, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved1989-02-28028 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved ML20235V4571989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemption from Regulatory Control.Agrees W/Recommendations & Limits Proposed by Health Physics Society in L Taylor Ltr to Commission ML20205P9691988-10-26026 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group W3P88-1366, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities1988-07-13013 July 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities ML20135F0931987-04-0909 April 1987 Testimony of Bb Hayes Before Senate Government Governmental Affairs Committee on 870326 Re Discovery of Sensitive NRC Document in Files of Senior Official of Louisiana Power & Light Co ML20212N5781986-08-27027 August 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $50,000 Based on Violations Noted in Insp Conducted on 860101-31. Violation Noted:Plant Entered Mode 3 While Relying on Action Requirements of Tech Spec 3.6.2.1 ML20202G3811986-04-10010 April 1986 Order Imposing Civil Penalties in Amount of $130,000,based on Safety Insps of Licensee Activities Under CPPR-103 Conducted from June 1983 - Sept 1985.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20210B9141986-02-0505 February 1986 Notice of Publication of Encl 841219 Order.Served on 860206 ML20198H4461986-01-30030 January 1986 Memorandum & Order CLI-86-01 Denying Remaining Portion of Joint Intervenors 841108 Fifth & Final Motion to Reopen Record Re Character & Competence of Util Per 850711 Decision ALAB-812.Dissenting View of Palladino Encl.Served on 860130 ML20137J3531986-01-17017 January 1986 Order Extending Time Until 860214 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 860117 ML20138P5301985-12-20020 December 1985 Order Extending Time Until 860117 for Commission to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851220 ML20137U4821985-12-0505 December 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851220 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851205 ML20138S0051985-11-15015 November 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851206 for Commission to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851115 ML20138H2451985-10-24024 October 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851115 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 851024 ML20133F2711985-10-0404 October 1985 Order Extending Time Until 851025 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812 .Served on 851007 ML20134L5981985-08-28028 August 1985 Notice of Appearance of R Guild & Withdrawal of Appearance by L Bernabei & G Shohet for Joint Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137J2801985-08-26026 August 1985 Answer in Opposition to Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Commission Review of Aslab 850711 Decision ALAB-812, Which Denied Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record.Kw Cook 850821 Affidavit Encl ML20137J2941985-08-21021 August 1985 Affidavit of Kw Cook Re Recent Equipment Failures Discussed in Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20136J1961985-08-19019 August 1985 Answer Requesting That Commission Deny Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review of ALAB-812 Denying Motion to Reopen QA & Character Competence Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133L8901985-08-0909 August 1985 Petition for Review of ALAB-812,denying Joint Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record of OL Hearing to Litigate Util Lack of Character & Inability to Assure Safe Operation in Light of Const QA Breakdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133L0421985-08-0808 August 1985 Order Extending Time Until 850920 for Commission to Act to Review ALAB-812.Served on 850808 ML20128Q1861985-07-23023 July 1985 Request for Extension of Time Until 850809 to File Appeal to 850711 ALAB-812 Denying Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Record.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20209F1921985-07-11011 July 1985 Decision ALAB-812 Denying Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record on Const QA & Mgt Character & Competence, Except Insofar as Issues Re Matters Under Investigation by Ofc of Investigation Are Raised.Served on 850711 ML20116P1931985-05-0606 May 1985 Response to NRC & Util Responses to Aslab 850322 Memorandum & Order ALAB-801.Motion to Reopen Record of Licensing Proceedings for Litigation of Util Competence Should Be Granted.Supporting Documentation & Svc List Encl ML20116H3341985-04-30030 April 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K3221985-04-10010 April 1985 Supplementary Comments Attesting to Validity of Statements of Fact in Sser 9 & Clarifying & Explaining Current Position on Resolution of Allegation A-48.Util Can Safely Operate & Manage Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20111C7021985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program to Be Performed at Levels Above 5% of Rated Power.Facility & Operating Staff in Excellent State of Readiness to Proceed W/Power Ascension ML20112A9381985-03-14014 March 1985 Affidavit of RP Barkhurst Re Power Ascension Testing Program Performed at Levels Above 5% Rated Power & Delay in Issuance of Full Power Operating Authority.Related Correspondence ML20111B6541985-03-12012 March 1985 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Applicant Response to Supplemental Memorandum.Svc List Encl ML20102C1351985-02-28028 February 1985 Response Opposing Joint Intervenors 850225 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Response to Suppl.Suppl Untimely Filed.Allegations Unsupported.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107M7321985-02-25025 February 1985 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motions to Reopen.Request Based on Recent Public Repts Re Instability & Lack of Independence of Mgt of Applicant & Lack of Respect for NRC ML20195F5871985-02-25025 February 1985 Affidavit of Rk Kerr Re 841120 Meeting W/Cain,Dd Driskill, R Barkhurst,Admiral Williams & Rs Leddick to Discuss Licensee 1983 Drug Investigation 05-001-83(966) & 841206 Meeting Between Licensee & NRC in Arlington,Tx ML20107M7461985-02-25025 February 1985 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen.Determination by Aslab That Joint Intervenors Met Burden to Reopen Record for Litigation of Contention That Util Mgt Lacks Competence Requested ML20101T3701985-02-0101 February 1985 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors 850125 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant 841130 & Staff 841221 Answers.Motion Should Be Denied & Reply Brief Rejected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101U3411985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation ML20101U3511985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation.Certificate of Svc Encl 1996-08-07
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20137J2801985-08-26026 August 1985 Answer in Opposition to Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Commission Review of Aslab 850711 Decision ALAB-812, Which Denied Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record.Kw Cook 850821 Affidavit Encl ML20136J1961985-08-19019 August 1985 Answer Requesting That Commission Deny Joint Intervenors 850809 Petition for Review of ALAB-812 Denying Motion to Reopen QA & Character Competence Issues.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133L8901985-08-0909 August 1985 Petition for Review of ALAB-812,denying Joint Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record of OL Hearing to Litigate Util Lack of Character & Inability to Assure Safe Operation in Light of Const QA Breakdown.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20128Q1861985-07-23023 July 1985 Request for Extension of Time Until 850809 to File Appeal to 850711 ALAB-812 Denying Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Record.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20116P1931985-05-0606 May 1985 Response to NRC & Util Responses to Aslab 850322 Memorandum & Order ALAB-801.Motion to Reopen Record of Licensing Proceedings for Litigation of Util Competence Should Be Granted.Supporting Documentation & Svc List Encl ML20111B6541985-03-12012 March 1985 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Applicant Response to Supplemental Memorandum.Svc List Encl ML20102C1351985-02-28028 February 1985 Response Opposing Joint Intervenors 850225 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum & Response to Suppl.Suppl Untimely Filed.Allegations Unsupported.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107M7461985-02-25025 February 1985 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen.Determination by Aslab That Joint Intervenors Met Burden to Reopen Record for Litigation of Contention That Util Mgt Lacks Competence Requested ML20107M7321985-02-25025 February 1985 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motions to Reopen.Request Based on Recent Public Repts Re Instability & Lack of Independence of Mgt of Applicant & Lack of Respect for NRC ML20101T3701985-02-0101 February 1985 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors 850125 Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant 841130 & Staff 841221 Answers.Motion Should Be Denied & Reply Brief Rejected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101U3411985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Motion for Leave to File Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation ML20101U3511985-01-25025 January 1985 Joint Intervenors Reply to Applicant & NRC 841221 Responses to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Three QA & Mgt Integrity Contentions for Litigation.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20112C0071985-01-0808 January 1985 Applicant Answer to NRC Staff Motion for Clarification &/Or Reconsideration Re Concrete Basemat & Qa.Qa Motion Lacks Presentation of Matters.Decision on QA Motion Should Be Reconsidered.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100B0251984-11-30030 November 1984 Response to Joint Intervenors Protective Order to Shield Identity of Several Individuals Having Executed Affidavits in Support of Concurrent Motion to Reopen Record.Motion Must Be Denied ML20100B0481984-11-30030 November 1984 Response to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motion to Reopen Record & Admit Contentions Alleging QA Failures,Applicant Lack of Character & Competence to Operate Plant & Inadequate Review. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099D2861984-11-16016 November 1984 Motion for Extension of Time to 841130 for Filing Answers to Joint Intervenors 841108 Motions Due to Vol of Matl & Thanksgiving Holiday.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107K6651984-11-0606 November 1984 Motion for Protective Order to Shield Identity of Individuals Who Signed Affidavits Providing Portion of Basis for Joint Intervenors 841107 Motion to Reopen Record on QA Breakdown at Plant ML20092B6371984-06-15015 June 1984 Response to NRC Motion for Addl Extension of Time Until 840706 to Respond to Joint Intervenors Amended & Supplemental Motion to Reopen Contention 22.No Objection Offered.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084P7961984-05-17017 May 1984 Response to NRC 840515 Motion for Further Extension of Time Until 840615 to Respond to Joint Intervenors Amended & Supplemental Motion to Reopen Contention 22.Motion Should Be Granted.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087P8541984-04-0606 April 1984 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time.Intervenors Have Had Two Chances to Present Adequate Motion to Open Record on QA Allegations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087N0871984-03-28028 March 1984 Motion for Extension of 6 Months to File Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080R9611984-02-20020 February 1984 Motion to Open QA Contention,Based in Part on Encl Article Re Doctored Records.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079F3241984-01-13013 January 1984 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors 831212 Amended & Supplemental Motion to Reopen Contention 22 & Request for Public Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083D9361983-12-22022 December 1983 Motion for Extension of Time Until 840113 to File Answer to Joint Intervenors 831212 Motion to Reopen Record to Consider Contention 22.Extension Needed Due to Holidays.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082T9991983-12-12012 December 1983 Amended & Supplemental Motion to Reopen Contention 22 in Light of Newly Discovered Evidence.News Article & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080R1851983-10-12012 October 1983 Response to NRC 831007 Motion for Further Extension to 831121 to File Response to Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Contention.Motion Not Opposed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076G8881983-08-29029 August 1983 Request for Extension to File Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Contention 22,to 10 Days After Util Receipt of Consultant Analysis Rept.Granted by Aslab on 830829 ML20024E2861983-08-0404 August 1983 Request for Extension Until 830909 to Allow Response to Joint Intervenor 830722 Motion to Reopen Record on Basis of Moisture Found on Foundation Mat Floor.Engineering Rept Due 830901.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072N8331983-07-15015 July 1983 Motion to Associate Author as co-counsel W/L Fontana for Intervenors ML20072N8591983-07-15015 July 1983 Motion to Reopen Contention 22 in Light of Newly Discovered Evidence ML20072N8821983-07-15015 July 1983 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Reopen Contention 22 Re Available Info on Slab Cracks Initially Reported in 1977, Reappearing on 830511.New Hearing Requested to re-review Deficiencies in Plant Design ML20024A0661983-06-10010 June 1983 Exceptions to ASLB 830526 Partial Initial Decision. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073Q4591983-04-26026 April 1983 Supports NRC 830415 Motion to Correct Hearing Transcript. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069H4771983-03-29029 March 1983 Request for 1-wk Extension of Filing Date for Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on Evacuation Brochure.No Opposition Expressed to Granting Applicant Reasonable Extension ML20069G4041983-03-22022 March 1983 Response Opposing State of La 830311 Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief on Issue of DHR Capability.Motion Untimely & No Good Cause Shown.Issue Abandoned by Parties Cannot Be Briefed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069E9681983-03-18018 March 1983 Request for Enlargement of 70-page Limit on Brief Opposing Joint Intervenors exceptions.Sixty-one Exceptions Cannot Be Addressed in 70 Pages.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C2691983-03-11011 March 1983 Motion to File Brief Amicus Curiae,Per 10CFR2.715,re Feed & Bleed Capability.Issue Must Be Presented to Aslab. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q5371983-02-23023 February 1983 Request for Extension Until 830325 to File Brief in Opposition to Joint Intervenors Exceptions.Extension Necessary Because of Time Needed to Prepare for Three Other NRC Proceedings.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070T1991983-02-0404 February 1983 Brief Supporting Joint Intervenors Exceptions Re Contentions 8/9 & 17/26 (1) & (2).Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070L4921982-12-27027 December 1982 Exceptions to 821103 Partial Initial Decision ML20079J3491982-12-24024 December 1982 Exception to ASLB 821103 Partial Initial Decision Re Condition 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070H4121982-12-17017 December 1982 Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 821213 Memorandum & Order.Due to Ill Health of E Duncan,30-day Extension Requested in Which to File Direct Testimony & Commence Hearings ML20067C5171982-12-0707 December 1982 Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors 821130 Motion to Extend Time for Filing Direct Testimony & to Reschedule Hearing on Emergency Brochure.Joint Intervenors Fail to Justify Untimeliness of Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069N3271982-11-29029 November 1982 Response Opposing Applicant 821112 Motion for Reconsideration & Clarification of Certain Rulings in ASLB 821103 Partial Initial Decision on Conditions for Evacuation & Ltrs of Agreement ML20028A3051982-11-17017 November 1982 Motion for Extension of Time Until 821129 to File Exceptions to ASLB 821103 Partial Initial Decision.Time Needed Due to Research Coordinator Giving Premature Birth & Having Minor Complications ML20066F0271982-11-12012 November 1982 Exceptions to ASLB 821103 Partial Initial Decision & Motion for Extension of Time to File Supporting Brief Until 30 Days After Svc of ASLB Ruling.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066E9571982-11-12012 November 1982 Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Portion of ASLB 821103 Partial Initial Decision Dealing W/Conditions Re State & Local Offsite Emergency Plans & Scope of Contention 2 on Vehicles & Drivers.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071N4061982-10-0606 October 1982 Erratum to Applicant 821004 Response to Joint Intervenors Motion to Reopen Record.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071N4111982-10-0606 October 1982 Response Opposing Joint Intervenors 820929 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Make Discovery & Objections to Request for Production of Documents.Discovery Requests Prohibited by Commission Rules ML20063N7481982-10-0404 October 1982 Response Opposing Joint Intervenors 820929 Motion to Reopen. Requests Not Founded in Fact or Law & Fly in Face of Any Sense of Administrative Discipline & Procedural Regularity. Some Requests Defy Logic.Certificate of Svc Encl 1985-08-09
[Table view] |
Text
', a ,
, an o
%N pc MWW ' ' e c;3 {th 95 v
-4 " 7 ';m4
,t-
%g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA b. '
If NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ,,
s . v/
<\ N
//
In the Matter of Adj LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Docket No. 50-382 (Waterford Steam Electric Statiou Operating License Unit 3) Application SAVE OUR WETLANDS, INC., AND OYSTERSHELL ALLlANCE, INC.
PETITION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE This is a petition for leave to intervene, in accord-ance with Section 2.714 of the Rules of Practice of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, filed on behalf of Save Our Wetlands, Inc., (S0WL); the Oyster Shell Alliance, Inc., (0ystershell) and with respect to the operating license application filed to commence operations at Water-ford Steam Station, Unit 3.
Interest of the Petitioners Petitioner S0WL is a Louisiana non-profit corporation ,
which has previously participated successfully in regula-tory proceedings and litigation directed towards preserving the unique character of the environment of Southern Louisi-ana's wetlands and waterways from unlawful development and harmful exploitation. 50WL has long been concerned with the protection, maintenance and enhancement of Louisiana's watarways and wetlands as a source of livelihood and re-creation, as well as an essential part of the life-support
~
~ ' "i l " " " " "
~
7 90 2 0 5 0M -5 g
system of the State's eco-system. In this regard SOUL is concerned with the potential health, safety and .aviron-mental problems associated with the operation of a nuclear facility in immediate proximity to the State's wetlands and waterways; as well as having vital concern for the health, safety and environmental problems raised by the prospect of storage of radioactive nuclear materials and wastes and the possible release of such materials which would be generated by the Waterford 3 facility.
S0WL has a membership in the Greater New Orleans Metropolitan Area (NOMA) of approximately 300 members.
These members live and work as close as some fourteen miles from the Waterford 3 site at Taft, Louisiana; to as much as forty miles away from the Waterford 3 site. Among major cities in the United States the NOMA is unique in that it is surrounded completely by marshlands and water-ways and the usable land is an average of some four feet ,
above mean sea level. The members of S0WL utilize these marshlands and waterways for recreation. Any change in the ecological balance between the wetlands and water-ways and inhabited land would have an immediate, dir-eet and proximately adverse impact upon the livelihood, property interests and living habits of the association's members. This intervention is supported by the entire membership of S0WL as part of its overall interest in environmental preservation.
Oystershell is a Louisiana non-profit corporation, which is the successor to a previously existing uninco-rporated association of approximately three hundred members who reside and work in the NOMA. Its student membership located in the Uptown and University areas resides approximately 24 miles from the Waterford 3 site at Taft, Louisiana. Members of Oystershell work-ing in the central business district of New Orleans are located approximately 26 miles from the Waterford 3 site.
Oystershell has been in existence approximately 2 years; and during that time it has engaged in public-izing the hazards of nuclear fission technology; the appropriateness of alternate energy technologies and the need for constant vigilance on the part of citizens re-garding the nuclear licensing process. Oystershell has been instrumental in supporting legislation which re-gulates the storage and disposal of nuclear wastes with-in the State or Louisiana.
Oystershell is concerned in these proceedings with the financial soundness of Louisiana Power and Light as a proper entity to fund, construct and operate the Water-ford facility, Oystershell is vitally concerned with the forseeable health and safety problems caused by licensing and operation of the Waterford 3 facility; as well as the adverse impact upon the petitioner's work and living environment of the possible discharge of radioactive mat-erials into the air, waterways and general enviroment surrounding the facility. The board of directors of Oystershell has specifically authorized this intervent-ion on behalf of its entire membership.
How Petitioners' Interests Will Be Affected The interest of the petitioners in tuis licensing proceeding will be adversely affected by the proposed action because the proposed action by the applicant would result in the operation of a facilit,' having sig-nificant safety deficiencies, as will be shown more particularly in petitioner's description of the spec-ific subject matter aspects of this intervention. Like-wise, petitioner's interests in a healthy and whole-some environment will be adversely affected by the ,
creation and introduction of radioactive materials into the environment; as well as by the indefinite storage and lack of appropriate planning for disposal of the radio-active materials generated by operation of Applicant's facility. In summary, the Louisiana Power and Light Proposal creates serious and unacceptable risks to the health and safety of petitioners, as well as the rest of the citizens of Southern Louisiana by subje :*ng them
_4
.~
to potential health, safety and environmental risks not adequately considered in any previous hearing.
In addition to the other interests set forth herein, Petitioner S0WL'S interest in preserving the quality of wetlands and waterways would be adversely affected as a result of direct discharges of Mississippi River from the facility; at' further S0WL'S preservationist interests would be adversely affected by health and safety con-siderations which would irreversably alter the existing ecological balances of wetlands and waterways in the vicinity of facility.
Petitioners have no direct financial or property interest in the proceeding; other than that they live, work and reside in the NOMA. Numerous members of the petitioning groups own property in the NOMA. Further, the approval of Applicant's operating license application would subject petitioners and their members to increased -
health, safety and environmental harms.
- Specific Aspects of the Subject Matter for Which Intervention is Sought Consistent with Petitioners' understanding of the Commission's regulation, Section 2.714, it is not the purpose of this requirement to require petitioners to set forth specific contentions. Petitioners hereby in-dicate that they are interested in all of the aspects of the subject matter of the proceeding, insofar as they relate to the follow issues:
(1) Necessity in the Public Interest for construct-ion of the facility.
(2) Capability of Applicant as a proper party to complete and operate a nuclear facility.
(3) Safety hazards created by construction and operation of the facility; including, but not exclusive-ly limited to the following:
(a) Failure to properly consider safety risks due to geologic faults anu' .r seismic activity in the area of the facility.
(b) Failure to properly consider and evaluate safety risks arising from lack of proper emergency planning.
(c) Failure to properly evaluate risks caused by potential turbine missles caused by malfunction of the ,
plant operation, and other unresolved safety issues.
(d) Failure to properly evaluate safety hazards created by carriage of dangerous and/or explosive mat-erials by rail and water carriers in close proximity co the app! Leant 's facility.
(e) Failure to properly evaluate risks caused by hydraulic events involving the Mississippi River and related waterways.
(4) Health issues relating to (a) the escape of low level radiation into the environment, (b) hazards created by spent fuel storage, (c) transportation of radioactive nuclear wastes, and (d) ultimate disposal of radioactive nuclear wastes.
(5) Adverse impact upon the existing environment caused by operation of the facility, and by storage and ultimate disposal of radioactive nuclear wastes, in-cluaing but not limited to the following:
(a) Potential damage to wetlands and waterways; (b) Potential damage to wildlife in tne vicinity of the plant; (c) Potential harm to residents vf the State of Louisiana, including Petitioners' membership; (d) Potential harm co future generations of resi-dents in the State of Louis;ina.
r CONCLUSION For all of the reasons set forth hereinabove, intervenors urge that their petition to intervene be granted and their standing to participate in these proceedings be recognized; and after due proceedings had herein, that the applicant's operating license application be disapproved; or, if approved, that it be approved subject to such additional safeguards and provisions as are just under these proceedings.
Respectfully, f /7 s v
LUKE FONTANA YkW '
824 Esplanade Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70116 (504) 524-0028 Counsel for Petitioners G I L L t. . & J0J"" .
\
\
\
B' 1 ,
r YMA' L . [/O " t. , fR.
910 'ecuri f omes ad Bldg.
49 0 Veter s Men lyd.
M tairie, a. 7 002 (504) 885-5672
-a-
AFFIDAVIT OF JANET MOULTON BEFORE M2, the undersigned, there did appear, Janet Moulton, who duly being placed on oath deposes and says:
- 1. That she is President of Save Our Wetlands, Inc.
- 2. That her business address is 2001 Veterans Boulevard.
Kenner, Louisiana 70062.
- 3. That she is aware of the contents of the Petition to Intervene and attests that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of her personal knowledge and belief.
,O D,y1 ,-
if$5 l'/I L Lbl6yv
/ANET MOULTON SUBS RIBED AND S' RN to before ae, this day of m v t
197( .
O
^
( .
m:., _
l/ Y /V/i Y
- N $\ RI' . U B L I MY CrAMISSION IS OR LIF
AFFIDAVIT OF BRUCE KING BEFORE ME, the undersigned, there did appear, Bruce King, who duly being placed on oath deposes and says-
- 1. That he is Vice President of Save Our Wetlands, Inc.
- 2. That his business cldress is 542 St. Peter Street, New Orleans, Louisiana.
- 3. That he is aware of the contents of the Petition to Intervene and attests that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of his personal knowledge and belief.
'\ ,
M BRUCf' KING *I M'BSCRIBED AND SWORN t) before me, this [ day of 97' i- _ -W X -
f' . . - - N .
/w V'
,, ~ - ~
NpA PUD [IC MY COMMISSI IS F0 LIFr.
D[# s,-d' N
AFFIDAVIT OF CLIFTON S. CARL, JR.
BEFORE ME, the undersigned, there did appear, Clifton J. Carl, Jr., who duly being placed on oath deposes and says.
- 1. That he is Treasurer of Oystershell Alliance, Inc.
- 2. That his residence address is 231 Sauve Road, River Ridge, Louisiana 70123.
- 3. That he is aware of the contents of the Petition to Intervene and attests that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of his personal knowledge and belief.
/
CLIFTON S. CARL, JR.
SUBSCRIBED AND S 'JO RN to before me, this ok day of u 19 9 I
/) w f Y* ..
A FUBLI// [ '.,
MY OMMISSION S FOR IFE. Q ,
W ,-l - .
{
]Ck M 'gc ,
%. /
'3
'/ , ,,
AFFIDAVIT OF NANCY HASKELL BEFORE ME, the undersigned, there did appear, Nancy Haskell, who duly being placed on oath deposes and says:
- 1. That she is Secretary of Oystershell Alliance, Inc.
- 2. That her residence address is 2840 St. Charles Ave.,
Apt. P., New Orleans, Louisiana.
- 3. That she is aware of the contents of the Petition to Intervene and attests that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of her personal knowledge and belief.
.N N Afd[ H A S K L L '
% SU SCRIBED AND S b'0 ? to before me, this
'k day of vwA-s , 1 79
' (
yv - .
f 70T, di P U B L VC
/
[ D 4
MY COMMISSION S FOR IFE. ,C ,7% . '
/ Vs' .'
[N) '
/,\
/ N , -$
~
), y s -~
F- J
,A 4 N#- 'a 5 , , '
% ,-p[p/ '
AFFIDAVIT OF PETER TROSCLAIR BEFORE ME, the undersigned, there did appear, Peter Trahan, who duly being placed on oath deposes and says:
- 1. That he is Vice-President of Oystershell Alliance, Inc.
- 2. That his residence address is 7932 South Claiborne Avenue, Apt. 4, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125.
- 3. That he is aware of the contents of the Petition to Intervene and attests that the information contained therein is true and correct to the best of his personal knowledge and belief.
OGN PETER TROSCLAIR SUF CRIBED AND SWORN to before me, this - day of
_C _, u_sp _ , '97 .
f
\
7I !
TA . PUBLK f MY 'OMMISSION FOR IFE. Dr g i ?,p .
s..
a hj
UNIfED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULAIORY COMMISSION In the Matter of .
LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY : DOCKET No. 50-382 (Waterford Steam Electric Station .
Unit 3)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE s
I hereby certify that on f&vurg_ kN , 1979, I
-g ,
malled copies of Save Our Wetlands, Inc., and Oystershell Alliance, Inc.'s Petition for Leave to Intervene to:
-cr llS, p 'b Secretary of the Commission dpE g] , (/
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j #; P' e f d ; 7 h Washington, D. C. 20555 "q C_;
Attention: Docketing and Service 4 g' ' ' . .. g ,'
Q}
b b', <!
Executive Legal Director fg c, .- ,. N /
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
'c9
/ ,g [,/,)[
b Mr. E. Blake, Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1300 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 l
M -- M ,e V F / /