ML17170A198
| ML17170A198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2016 |
| From: | David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16242A222 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17170A198 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: 02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
1.
w
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. Ju. lr I~ 8-T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N
- d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. J..,. ~
2.
s
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
Ju. ?
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
~ fct?-
T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 R
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ~ uz-
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A
L (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) ~ iJL K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form.
H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form 0
u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified ~~ (F-G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. ~ ,;?--
~
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. iJ-G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~ 6l-N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ JZ..
R A
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ uz-L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~ ~
Printed ~ffiignature rt:f Date W
~
- a. Author Dell McNeil 1 /?tctf?t.
~.i:IL
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a
- c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) o.,;, Ree"' I ~
- d. NRC Supervisor RobertOrlikowskiL==-~ 'L
- Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 1 of 28