ML17170A198
| ML17170A198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2016 |
| From: | David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16242A222 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17170A198 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination: 02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c#
- 1. w
J,.. P/A (j.-
R
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
Ju.
lr T
Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
I~
8-E
- c.
N J..,.
~
- d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of Ju.
?
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s
I M
- b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule
~
fct?-
L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and
~
uz-R
- c.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form
~
A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form iJL L
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T
the form.
H R
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
~~
(F-u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G
(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
~
- c.
,;?--
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
~
iJ-appropriate exam sections.
G
~
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
~
JZ..
E
- c.
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
~
uz-A
~
~
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
t{M
~~ oz.-
Printed ~ffiignature rt:f Date
~
- a. Author Dell McNeil 1 W /?tctf?t.
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
n/a
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner(#)
o.,;, Ree"' I ~
~.i:IL
- d.
NRC Supervisor RobertOrlikowskiL==-~ 'L
- Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 1 of 28