ML23038A157
| ML23038A157 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/01/2022 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp |
| Greg Roach | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML21188A233 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML23038A157 (2) | |
Text
y y
y y
y y
y y
y y
(Y)es / (N)o QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued) a b* c#
y y y
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
- 5. The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to observe y y y and evaluate applicant performance.
- 6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators NIA have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are y N/A y
given.
y
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. y y
- 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure y y y that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
All
- 9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4. y New y y
- 10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum y y y number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 submitted with the scenario set.
- 11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks y across y y y
scenarios, when possible.
y
- 12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. y y Actual Attributes by (Y)es / (N)o TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4) Scenario No.
1 I 2 / 3 I 4* a b* c#
- 1. Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) 3 I 2 I 1 I 1 y y y entry (1-2)
- 2. Abnormal events (2-4) 3 / 5 / 5 I 4 y y y
- 3. Major transients (1-2) #
y y y 2( )/ 1 / 1 I 1
- 4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 y y y
- 5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions #
1( ) / 1 / 1 I 1 y (2: 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios y y prepared for the scheduled exam)
- 6. Preidentified critical tasks (2: 2) 2 / 2 / 2 I 2 y y y Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Author Rav Torres / 4/LJ 09/21/2022
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) Steve Kaoostasv / C / ---+-
09/21/2022 Gregory M. Roach, Jr. l Gregory M. Roach, Jr. 10/07/2022 C. NRC Reviewer(#)
NRC Chief Examiner Gregory M. Roach, Jr. Gregory M. Roach, Jr. 10/07/2022 NRC Supervisor April M. Nguyen 12/1/2022
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.
( ) Scenario also contains a Contingency MaJor that will exercise a Contingency EOP (4*) Spare Scenario ES-2.3, Page 11 of 19