ML22165A334
| ML22165A334 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/29/2021 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20136A288 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22165A334 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilitv: Perry Date of Exam:
Scenario Numbers:
1/2/3/4 / 5 Operatino Test No.: 2021-01 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES I
Initials a
b*, I c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of A(f/ ~ 1 service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
/n 'f~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
,1rtl y'
/ '
~t\\s
- 3.
Each event description consists of f
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event Jl ~~
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) fi,rv'
(.,,
the event termination point (if aoolicable) n *
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
'-JJ1,-, )t1 ~~
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete t)Jf _;/{ ~
evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
, V,
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
NIA NIA roo Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue lime constraints.
Cues are given.
n 111'(
\\ **' ~
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
v? 1,.,,
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance
~ /.
deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional id/I
_/,' ~""
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
r-
-,1
- 9.
Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
/)_ ~
LL NEW >.Ji l, ~&>
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the
/ *~
form along with the simulator scenarios).
11//.
The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable 7
\\,-'
- 11.
/}J/
~teij rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
_,,,a,*
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified I
'./),
- 12.
f//ll
~J:,
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
A
-/
- 13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when 7 -v
-~
- possible.
/Jil'
-, g>~
- 14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
rU>r I )iC ;::,~
~
Taraet Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section 0.5.d).
Actual Attributes
- ,.7 1/2/3/3/3 4)1'/t
,.... ~
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
I,:,
./~
J 3/4/ 3 /2/2
~ ~
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) ti)!,.,,..
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 / 1 / 2 / 1 in ~
~~
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/2/1/2/1
-1)/i,' J5£7 R~
- 5.
Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (~ 1 per scenario set) 1 I O I l / 1 / 1
/1,/-- 'X::£,,J fJ.)
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (~2) 3/2/5/3*/2 lvr,,,{)L ~
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Number does not include 1 Potential CT NUREG 1021, Rev. 11 Page 25 of 33