ML16256A246
| ML16256A246 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/2016 |
| From: | Entergy Operations |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16256A115 | List:
|
| References | |
| W3F1-2016-0053 | |
| Download: ML16256A246 (11) | |
Text
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 5.4A-i Revision 14 (12/05)
APPENDIX 5.4A DYNAMIC ANALYSIS FOR THE WATERFORD 3 REACTOR VESSEL SUPPORT LOADS UNDER LOCA CONDITIONS(DRN 03-2059, R14) This appendix was written with respect to main coolant loop breaks (MCLBs), which were subsequently eliminated from consideration of mechanical (dynamic) effects via leak-before-break (LBB) arguments.
Elimination of MCLBs by LBB and replacement with branch line pipe breaks (BLPBs) is discussed in Section 3.6.2. LBB methodology is discussed in Section 3.6.3. This appendix has been retained for the historical record because the Reactor Vessel (RV) support loads, as well as RV shell response motions used in RV internals evaluations, that were generated from this analysis, bound the respective RV responses generated by the branch line pipe break (BLPB) analysis
for power uprate to 3716 MWt. (DRN 03-2059, R14)
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 5-4A-15.4A.1PURPOSEThis appendix presents the results of dynamic structural analyses of the WATERFORD 3 reactor vesseland supports subjected to loads induced by pipe breaks at the reactor vessel inlet and outlet nozzles and at the steam generator inlet nozzle. Two generations of dynamic analysis are presented; the original analysis using the original model and results of Reference 1 thermohydraulic methodology, the second analysis using an expanded model and results of Reference 2 methodology. Simultaneous effects of pipe break thrust and external and internal horizontal and vertical asymmetric pressure loads were applied to the reactor vessel and internals as a consequence of each postulated pipe rupture. A non-linear timehistory dynamic analysis of a three dimensional mathematical model of the Reactor Coolant System including details of the reactor internals, pressure vessel, supports and piping was performed for each postulated pipe break to demonstrate the adequacy of the reactor vessel supports.5.4A.2CONCLUSIONThe calculated loads on reactor vessel supports do not exceed specified loads except for one load in theoriginal analysis. For all supports, all calculated loads have been evaluated and found to be acceptable.5.4A.3BACKGROUNDThe reactor internals, including the fuel and supporting structures, are suspended from the closure flangeregion of the reactor vessel and are surrounded by the cylindrical "core support barrel" (CSB) as shown onFigure 5.4A-1. The CSB and reactor vessel are essentially concentric cylinders throughout the length of the CSB.Upon postulation of a break in a primary coolant pipe, as on Figure 5.4A-2, several rapidly occurringevents cause internal and external transient loads to act upon the reactor vessel. For a reactor vesselinlet break, asymmetric pressure changes take place in the annulus between the CSB and the vessel.
Decompression occurs on the side of the vessel nearest the pipe break before pressure on the opposite side changes. The momentary difference in pressure across the CSB induces lateral loads in opposite directions on the CSB and the reactor vessel as shown on Figure 5.4A-3. Vertical loads are also applied to the internals and to the vessel due to the vertical flow resistance through the core and asymmetric axial decompression of the vessel. Simultaneously, as fluid escapes through the break, the annulus between the reactor vessel and biological shield wall becomes asymmetrically pressurized. The difference in pressure across the reactor vessel causes additional horizontal and vertical external loads on the vessel as shown on Figure 5.4A-4. In addition, the vessel is loaded by the effects of initial tension release and blowdown thrust on the broken pipe (Figure 5.4A-5).The loads occur simultaneously as shown on Figure 5.4A-6. For a reactor vessel outlet break, the sametype of loadings as shown on Figure 5.4A-6 occur, but the internal loads are more predominately vertical due to smaller break size and more rapid decompression of the upper plenum. For each postulated breakthe time history maximum reactor vessel support reactions due to the complete set of horizontal andvertical loads are calculated.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-35.4A-2Revision 10 (10/99)For a steam generator (SG) inlet break, the same type of loadings on the reactor vessel (RV) as shown onFigure 5.4A-6 occur, but because of the position of the break, the initial tension release and blowdown thrust contain a vertical component of load that enhances rocking effects on the vessel. Because this break occurs in the SG subcompartment and not in the RV cavity, there are no differential pressure loads on the reactor vessel.5.4A.4MODELSDifferent models were developed for the two generations of dynamic analysis. In the original analysis,condensed structural models of the RCS and reactor internals were created from highly detailed representations of each component by maintaining response characteristics and interface response compatibility. A detailed model of the reactor coolant system is shown on Figure 5.4A-7 and a detailed model of the reactor internals is shown on Figure 5.4A-8. The internals model and the RCS model were condensed and coupled to form the final model used for the analysis of the vessel supports. (See Figures 5.4A-9 and 5.4A-10.) The condensed model of the internals is intended to represent the effects of the reactor internals on the reactor vessel support reactions and is not intended to be used to analyze the internals themselves. The adequacy of the reduced model of the internals for this purpose was verified by analysis of planar models of a coupled system having a detailed internals model and a simplified representation of the vessel and supports. Figures 5.4A-11 and 5.4A-12 show excellent agreement between the reactor vessel support reactions using the detailed and the reduced internals models. This model was used for the analysis of the 350 in.
2 R.V. inlet nozzle and 100 in.
2 R.V. outlet nozzlecircumferential guillotines. The criteria used to define break and crack locations and configuration for high energy piping systems is discussed in FSAR Section 3.6.2.1.The details of the coupled model are summarized in Table 5.4A-2. The model is three dimensional andhas 680 total static degrees of freedom and 61 mass degrees of freedom. The reactor vessel and all internal components are modeled as colinear elements and gaps are present at internal and support interfaces. Details of the reactor vessel support arrangements are shown on Figure 5.4A-13.The models for the second set of dynamic asymmetric loads analyses contain a similarly detailed reactorvessel and condensed reactor internals model. However, they also contain detailed steam generator (SG),
pump (RCP), RCS piping and RCS support modelling and are a combination of models shown by Figures 5.4A-7 and 5.4A-8. These expanded models were used for a comparative analysis of the 350 in.
2 break(see Figure 5.4A-5) and for the analysis of the 600 in.
2 S.G. inlet nozzle circumferential guillotine. For the 600 in.2 SG inlet nozzle break, an elasto-plastic multi-mass model of the severed hot leg with a gappedpipe restraint was added to the model. The model used for the 350 in.
2 break has 1912 total staticdegrees of freedom and 108 mass degrees of freedom. The model used for the 600 in.
2 break has 1961total static degrees of freedom and 131 mass degrees of freedom.The physical definition of the structure was given as input to the STRUDL (3) Computer Code whichgenerated the condensed stiffness matrix used in the dynamic analysis. Hydrodynamic effects, including both virtual mass and annular effects, were accounted for in the coupling between the RV and CSB and between the CSB and the core shroud. The resulting mass matrix is non-diagonal because of the inclusion of the annular hydrodynamic effects (Reference 4).All RCS support stiffnesses and pipe restraint stiffnesses used were plant specific.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3(DRN 00-1059)(DRN 00-1059)5.4A-3 Revision 11-A (02/02) 5.4A.5 FORCING FUNCTIONS The original model shown on Figures 5.4A-9 and 5.4-10 and described in Table 5.4A-2 was subjected to the loads that resulted from a postulated rupture at the inlet and outlet RV nozzles
(350 in.2 and 100 in.
2 breaks respectively). The location and size of breaks have been determined using the methods of Reference 5 and are summarized in Table 5.4A-3. For each postulated break a thermohydraulic analysis was performed according to the procedures and models developed in Reference 1. The resulting
pressure and flow parameters were used to calculate three dimensional time history forcing functions acting
on the reactor vessel and internals at the locations shown on Figures 5.4A-9 and 5.4A-10. Analyses to
calculate the asymmetric subcompartment pressures in the reactor vessel cavity were performed by Ebascousing mass energy release data provided by CE. The resulting pressures were used to calculate the three dimensional time history forces applied to the exterior of the vessel. The forces were applied to the model at
the locations shown on Figure 5.4A-10. Internal and external forces were applied simultaneously in three directions to the Vessel-Internals System. The dynamic analysis to determine the response to the system
is performed using the DAGS and FORCE (6,7) codes to determine the maximum reactions at the vessel
support to locations shown on Figure 5.4A-14.(DRN 00-1059)
The expanded models, shown on Figures 5.4A-7 and 5.4A-10 and described in Tables 5.4A-4 and 5.4A-5, were subjected to the loads that resulted from a postulated rupture at each of the RV inlet and SG inlet
nozzles (350 in.
2 and 600 in.
2 breaks, respectively). For each of these postulated breaks, a thermohydraulic analysis was performed according to the procedures and models developed in Reference 2.
All dynamic analysis methodology used was the same as in the original analysis.(DRN 00-1059) 5.4A.6 RESULTS Results of maximum reactor vessel supports loads are given in Table 5.4A-1 for all postulated breaks.
It can be seen from Table 5.4A-1 that the 350 in.
2 inlet break produces the controlling values for all supportforce components. The table also shows the comparison results between the original and revised analyses
for the controlling 350 in.
2 break. This comparison demonstrates that the original analysis providedconservative results. In addition, the table demonstrates that no updated support load exceeds any originally specified load. All calculated support loads in the table have been evaluated and found to be
acceptable.
Figure 5.4A-15 shows vessel vertical support reactions both with and without the internal loads for the original 350 in.
2 RV inlet nozzle guillotine analysis. The major effect of the internal loads on the verticalsupports is to increase the maximum compressive reaction by a factor of three.
Figure 5.4A-16 shows horizontal support reaction with and without the internal loads for the same analysis.
The major effect of the internal loads on the horizontal supports is to shift the phasing of the load response.
The maximum horizontal support load with internal applied loads is not greater than the maximum horizontal
support load without internal WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 5-4A-4applied loads, but they occur at different times. The effect is due to the combination of a relatively lowratio of horizontal concrete stiffness to vertical concrete stiffness (under the support pads). This combination causes the pads to take vertical load in resisting the overturning effects of the horizontal forces on the vessel.Inside the vessel, interface gaps are found to open and close many times. It can be seen from Figure5.4A-15 that the total vertical effect of all loads on the system can cause the vessel to overcome its compressive dead weight and thermal growth loads on the support pad, traverse the vertical support gap,and engage the anchor bolts. The vessel does lift off, from as many as all four pads simultaneously, butmost often it remains in contact, oscillating on one or more compressed pads. The horizontal effect of all loads on the system causes the vessel to traverse the horizontal support gaps, impact the supports and remain in contact oscillating about a deflected, closed gap position.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3 5-4A-5
REFERENCES:
SECTION 5.4A1.CENPD-42, Topical Report on Dynamic Analysis of Reactor Vessel Internals, December 1973.2.CENPD-252-P-A, Topical Report, "Method for the Analysis of Blowdown Induced Forces ina Reactor Vessel," July 1979.3.ICES STRUDL II. The Structural Design Language Engineers Users Manual, M.I.T.Press.,Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1968.4.Fritz, R. J. and Kiss, E., The Vibration Response of a Cantilevered CylinderSurrounded by an Annular Fluid KAPL-M-6539m Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory,Schenectady, New York.5.CENPD-168A, Topical Report on Design Basis Pipe Breaks, June 1977.
6.Lien, J. S., R. P. Kassawara, H. B. Smith, Dynamic Analysis of Piecewise LinerStructures, ASCE Specialty Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, 1975.7.Kassawara, R. P., and Peck, D. A., Dynamic Analysis of Structural Systems Excitedat Multiple Support Locations, SCE Specialty Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 1973.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 5.4A-1RESULTS OF LOCA ANALYSIS OF REACTOR VESSEL SUPPORTSMaximum LOCA Absolute Reactor Vessel Support LoadsForce Component (See Figure 5.4A-14)AccidentHV (pad)V (bolts) 100 in 2 RV Outlet27212001514Nozzle Guillotine(1)350 in 2RV Inlet375951602106Nozzle Guillotine(1)350 in 2 RV Inlet362532251403Nozzle Guillotine(2)600 in 2 SG Inlet15662255145Nozzle Guillotine(2)Design Maximum LOCA Loads542652004530(1)Using condensed RCS model and internal loads from Reference 1 methodology(2)Using full RCS model and internal loads from Reference 2 methodology WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 5.4A-2REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM MODELMass Point DegreesHydrodynamic ActiveComponent Number of Freedom CouplingDirections
_________9918XYZ 9918-18 9913 9999-16Reactor 9909-9 XZ 9905-5Vessel9909 9914-149905 XZ 9914 999918Gap Locations DegreesInitial 9XYZof FreedomConditionCore13 9918-18 Support 9918-38 YClosed with Barrel 5 18-38Compressive14 XZ 28-29Preload 16 20-2Lower 2XYZ 9914-14 XZOpen, Gap +/-Support 9999-16 X Structure 2024XYZFuel28Assembly22 XZ 26Core 6XYZShroud10 XZUpper38XYZGuide32 Structure29 WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 5.4A-3 PIPE BREAK
SUMMARY
Flow AreaPipeLocationBreak Type Description(Sq. in..)R.V. terminal endcircumferential break100hot legS.G. terminal endcircumferential break600R.V. terminal endcircumferential break350dischargePump terminal endcircumferential break480 legPump terminal endcircumferential break430suctionPump elbowslot + 90
° from elbow crotch532 legS.G. elbowslot + 90
° from elbow crotch532S.G. terminal endcircumferential break592
_____________________________________Note: Flow areas listed are total area available for flow from both sides of a given break location.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 5.4A-4EXPANDED REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM MODEL 350 IN.2 RV INLET NOZZLE BREAKIn addition to those mass degrees of freedom shown in Table 5.4A-2, the following were included for this break:ComponentMass Point NumberDegrees of FreedomR.C. Pumps1103XYZ(in intact2103 legs)*5103 11012101 XZ 5101Intact1760R.C. Piping*2760XYZ 5760 15802580XYZ 5580 800XYZ 3800SG 409 XZ 3409 404XYZ 3404* For break postulated at the 2B RV inlet nozzle.
WSES-FSAR-UNIT-3TABLE 5.4A-5EXPANDED REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM MODEL600 IN.2 S.G. INLET NOZZEL BREAKIn addition to those mass degrees of freedom shown in Tables 5.4A-2 and 5.4A-4, the following were included forthis break:ComponentMass Point NumberDegrees of FreedomReconnected 4103XYZ2B R.C. Pump 4101XZ and Piping 4760XYZ 4580XYZSevered 3851Hot Leg 3850XYZ 38501 3550XY 3751