ML12137A889
| ML12137A889 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/2012 |
| From: | Mark Haire Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Peter Dietrich Southern California Edison Co |
| References | |
| IR-12-004 | |
| Download: ML12137A889 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000361/2012004
Text
UNITE D S TATE S
NUC LEAR RE GULATOR Y C OMMI S SI ON
RE G IO N I V
1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD
AR L INGTON , TEXAS 7 60 11 - 4511
May 15, 2012
Mr. Peter Dietrich
Senior Vice President and
Chief Nuclear Officer
Southern California Edison Company
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
P.O. Box 128
San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
SUBJECT: SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 -
NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION (NRC INSPECTION
REPORT 050000361/2012004 AND 050000362/2012004) AND
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Dietrich:
From July 30 through August 3, 2012, inspectors from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commissions (NRC) Region IV office will perform the baseline biennial requalification
inspection at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, using NRC Inspection
Procedure 71111.11B, Licensed Operator Requalification Program. Experience has shown
that this inspection is a resource intensive inspection both for the NRC inspectors and your staff.
In order to minimize the impact to your onsite resources and to ensure a productive inspection,
we have enclosed a request for documents needed for this inspection. These documents have
been divided into three groups. The first group (Section A of the enclosure) identifies
information to be provided prior to the inspection to ensure that the inspectors are adequately
prepared. The second group (Section B of the enclosure) identifies the information the
inspectors will need upon arrival at the site. The third group (Section C of this enclosure)
identifies the items which are necessary to close out the inspection and are usually sent a few
weeks after the team has left the site. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date
and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the
preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection.
We have discussed the schedule for these inspection activities with your staff and understand
that our regulatory contact for this inspection will be Mr. David Axeline of your licensing
organization. Our inspection dates are subject to change based on your updated schedule of
examination activities. If there are any questions about this inspection or the material
requested, please contact the lead inspector, Kelly Clayton, at (817) 200-1216
(kelly.clayton@nrc.gov) or Sean Hedger at (817) 200-1556 (sean.hedger@nrc.gov).
P. Dietrich -2-
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0018. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document
system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/ Kelly Clayton for
Mark S. Haire, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Dockets: 50-361; 50-362
Enclosure:
Inservice Inspection Document Request
Electronic Distribution for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
P. Dietrich -3-
Electronic distribution by RIV:
Regional Administrator (Elmo.Collins@nrc.gov)
Deputy Regional Administrator (Art.Howell@nrc.gov)
DRP Director (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov)
DRP Deputy Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Director (Tom.Blount@nrc.gov)
Acting DRS Deputy Director (Patrick.Louden@nrc.gov)
Senior Resident Inspector (Greg.Warnick@nrc.gov)
Resident Inspector (John.Reynoso@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief, DRP/D (Ryan.Lantz@nrc.gov)
SONGS Administrative Assistant (Heather.Hutchinson@nrc.gov)
Senior Project Engineer (Nick.Taylor@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (David.You@nrc.gov)
Project Engineer, DRP/D (Brian.Parks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov)
Acting Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
OEMail Resource
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Michael.McCoppin@nrc.gov)
DRS/TSB STA (Dale.Powers@nrc.gov)
ADAMS: No 7 Yes 7 SUNSI Review Complete Reviewer Initials: KDC
7 Publicly Available 7 Non-Sensitive
Category B.1. Non-publicly Available Sensitive
KEYWORD: SUNSI Review Complete
RIV:SOE/OB C:OB
KClayton MHaire
/RA/ /RA/
5/15/2012 5/15/2012
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax
BIENNIAL REQUALIFICATION INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
From: Kelly Clayton
Operations Engineer, NRC RIV
817-200-1216
To: Dennis Brill
Requalification Supervisor, SONGS
949-368-3011
Subject: Information Request to Support July and August 2012 Licensed Operator
Requalification Program Inspection (IP 71111.11B)
A. The following information is requested in order to support inspection preparation
activities. These items are listed by section as they appear in the inspection module
(i.e., 2.02, 2.04, etc.). Requested materials should be sent either electronically or
hardcopy in order to arrive at the Region IV office no later than July 27, 2012.
- Electronically: To: Kelly Clayton (kelly.clayton@nrc.gov)
cc: Sean Hedger (sean.hedger@nrc.gov)
cc: Nick Hernandez (Nicholas.hernandez@nrc.gov)
- Hardcopy to: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV
1600 E. Lamar Blvd
Arlington, TX 76011
ATTN: Kelly Clayton
General Requests:
- Training and Operations Department organization charts (with qualified LOR
evaluators identified)
- Procedures that identify process for revising and maintaining LO continuing training
program up-to-date
- List of outstanding LOR program changes
- List of plant events and industry operating experience incorporated into LOR
program since last BRQ
- Audits and/or self-assessment reports addressing the licensed operator
requalification training program
- Last two years of simulator review committee (or equivalent) meeting minutes
- Last two years of CRC (or equivalent) meeting minutes
02.03: Biennial Requalification Written Examination Quality
- The current and approved biennial written examination schedule
have already been administered up to the week prior to the inspection team arrival
onsite.
-1- Enclosure
- All written examinations that have been approved for administration up to and
including the week before the inspection team is onsite. This will need to have
adequate password protection if e-mailed or double envelope protection if mailed via
regular mail per NUREG-1021.
- The current requalification cycle examination methodology (sample plan)
02.04: Annual Requalification Operating Test Quality
- The schedule for the operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given the week of
July 30 (week team is onsite)
- The operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) (password protected and provide separately
via telephone at later date) to be given the week of July 30 (week team is onsite)
prior to the inspection team arrival onsite.
- All of the previous years (2011) NRC-required annual operating tests.
- Current requalification cycle operating test methodology (sample plan)
- All portions of the UFSAR that identify operator response times for time critical
operator actions
02.05: Licensee Admin of Requalification Exams
- All procedures used to administer the annual operating test
- All procedures used to assess operator performance
- All procedures that describe conduct of simulator training
- All procedures used to test, operate, and maintain the simulator
02.06: Requalification Examination Security
- Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
the written examinations and also meet the intent of sampling all required topics on a
periodic basis.
- Submit any tracking tools that you use as a means to prevent excessive overlap on
the operating tests and also meet the intent of sampling all required malfunctions
(including major events, instrument/component malfunctions, TS calls, etc.) on a
periodic basis.
- All procedures that describe examination security, including procedures used to
develop the examinations that include guidelines on overlap between examinations
in current exam cycle tests and prior year examinations
- List of all condition reports since the last biennial requalification inspection related to
examination security and overlap
02.07: Licensee Remedial Training Program
- List of remedial training conducted or planned since last requalification exams
(includes training provided to operators to enable passing requalification exams and
training provided to correct generic or individual weaknesses observed during
previous requalification exam cycle)
- Remediation plans (lesson plans, reference materials, and attendance
documentation)
-2- Enclosure
02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions
- All procedures and program documentation for maintaining active operator licenses,
tracking training attendance, and ensuring medical fitness of licensed operators
- All procedures and associated documentation that supports reactivation of any
SRO/RO license (operating or staff crew) since the last biennial inspection
02.09: Simulator Performance
- For the following cases, send the most recent transient test packages, which may be
electronic or in paper single test packages and shall be complete with test
procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient
test, the reference chart should be included, or an equivalent subject matter expert
review, versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
ANSI 3.5 standard requirements.
o Transient test 8, Max RCS rupture with LOSP
o Transient test 6, Main turbine trip (no reactor trip)
o Transient test 10, Stuck open PORV
o Steady State tests for 50 percent and 100 percent power
- All Simulator Management and Configuration Procedures if not already provided for
Section 02.05 above.
- Simulator Discrepancy Report summary list for all open DRs. For closed DRs,
summary list for those items closed between July 2010 and July 2012.
- Malfunction Tests for Main Steam and Main Feed Line breaks. If these are included
in an SBT package, then the review of that package would be acceptable.
- Test packages for Moderator Temperature Coefficient and Integral Rod Worth
(tested in order to verify core physics parameters). This shall include the applicable
reference graphs from the plant physics data book (electronic or other means as
available) as well as the test procedures used and the acceptance criteria with
results.
02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution
- A summary report of all condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the
control room
- Any revised requalification training that was based on licensed operator performance
issues
B. The following information is requested in order to support the onsite inspection
activities. Requested materials should be available to the inspection team, either
electronically or hardcopy, upon site arrival on July 30, 2012.
02.02: Exam Results / 02.03 and 02.04: Written Exam and Op Test Quality
- All Operating tests (JPMs & scenarios) to be given in all subsequent weeks after
onsite week
- All results up to the day the team leaves the site.
-3- Enclosure
02.08: Conformance with Operator License Conditions
- Access to licensed operators records (operating and staff crews)
- Access to licensed operators training attendance records
- Access to licensed operators medical records
02.09: Simulator Performance
- Simulator discrepancies (DRs) from July 2010 through July 2012. This should
include all open DRs and DRs that have been closed, including the
documentation/justification for closure.
- Acceptance test documentation, including hardware and software model revisions at
the time of acceptance (as available).
- Documentation that validates current models, including the thermal-hydraulics and
neutronics models, to the actual plant.
- All current model deficiencies, including FSAR versus design differences in the
simulator (any documentation on this)
- Summary list of modifications from July 2010 through July 2012.
- Plant Modifications (both hardware and software) completed on the Simulator by due
date from July 2010 through July 2012.
- Simulator Differences Lesson Plan used in training (current to July 30, 2012).
- The complete book of all Simulator annual performance test packages (usually in a
single book, but may be electronic or in single test packages), complete with all
transient tests, steady state tests, and malfunction tests. This should also include the
test procedures for each test, the acceptance criteria, and results. For each transient
test, the reference chart should be included, or an equivalent subject matter expert
review, versus the simulator results with a write-up for any differences beyond the
ANSI standard requirements.
- All test packages used to verify core physics parameters (such as MTC, IRW). The
applicable reference graphs from the Plant physics data book (electronic or other
means as available) should also be included as well as the test procedures used and
the acceptance criteria with results.
- All Simulator test, configuration management, and related documents available in the
room for inspectors to review. This includes training needs, analysis packages,
simulator review committee meeting minutes, etc.
- Current copy of ANSI 3.5 Standard you are committed to for simulator testing.
02.10: Problem Identification and Resolution
- All condition reports related to operator actions/errors in the control room
C. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is required to send the final results summary
and any remaining exams and operating tests that have not been reviewed to the
Regional Office lead inspector for this inspection for final review and comparison
against the Significance Determination Tools in order to communicate the exit results
for the inspection.
-4- Enclosure