ML053040158

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Duke Energy Corp, Oconee, Units 1, 2 and 3, Enclosure, Meeting Summary, Design Overview of Digital Reactor Protective System
ML053040158
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/18/2005
From:
Duke Energy Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Olshan L N, NRR/DLPM, 415-1419
Shared Package
ML053050006 List:
References
TAC MC5895, TAC MC5896, TAC MC5897
Download: ML053040158 (13)


Text

Oconee Nuclear Station RPS/ESPS Upgrade October 18, 2005

2 Opening Remarks Opening Remarks Y Nuclear Safety Y Quality Approach Y Need for Upgrade Y Proven Platform Y Precedents Support this Project Y Duke and Framatome Committed to Resolving NRC Concerns

3 Project Overview Project Overview Y RPS/ESPS Upgrade - Applying Teleperm XS (TXS)

³ Three Oconee Units, 18 Cabinets Each Y Initial RPS/ESPS Project Briefing Provided to Staff March 2002 Y Defense-in-Depth & Diversity (D3) Analysis Submitted March 2003 Y License Amendment Request Submitted February 14, 2005 Y Lead Unit Installation - Fall 2006

4 TXS Generic Approval TXS Generic Approval Y Framatome Topical Report Submitted - September 1998 Y Safety Evaluation Report (SER) Issued - May 2000 the staff concludes that the design of the TXS system is acceptable for safety-related instrumentation and control (I&C) applications and meets the relevant regulatory requirements.

The SER is the Starting Point for This Project

5 TXS Protection System TXS Protection System Applications Applications Implementation Bohunice V2 - 2 Units Design Certification US EPR - TBD Design Certification Flamanville 3 - 1 Unit Design Ling Ao II - 2 Units Design Olkiluoto 3 - 1 Unit New Plants Design Loviisa - 2 Units Implementation Qinshan I - 1 Unit Commissioning Tianwan - 2 Units Operating FRM II - 1 Unit Operating Beznau - 2 Units Operating Paks - 4 Units Operating Bohunice V1 - 2 Units Modernization Projects RPS & ESPS Share Common Processors On 21+ Projects

6 TXS TXS Operating Experience Operating Experience FANP Proprietary

7 Y Project Schedule Y System Architecture Y Data Communication Structure Y Defense-in-Depth & Diversity (D3)

Key Issues Key Issues

8 Project Schedule Project Schedule Y First NRC Staff Briefing - March 2002 Y First NRC Audit - July 2002 Y D3 Report Submitted - March 2003 Y LAR Submitted - February 2005 Y RAIs - Ongoing Y Telecons, Audits & Meetings Y Lead Unit Installation - October 2006 We Will Provide Whatever Support is Necessary Schedule is Driven by Reliability &

Obsolescence Issues

System Architecture System Architecture 9

FANP Proprietary

Data Communications Data Communications 10 FANP Proprietary

11 Defense Defense--in in--Depth &

Depth &

Diversity Diversity Y

Analyze UFSAR Transients & Accidents

³ Demonstrate Acceptability of a SWCMF in RPS & ESPS Y

Software Common Mode Failure

³ Beyond Design Basis

³ SECY Letter 93-087

³ SRM Letter dated 7/21/93

) Best Estimate Analysis

) Diverse Actuation via Non-Safety

) Manual Action - Feasible & Reliable (Human Factor RAIs)

Y D3 Report per BTP-19 Submitted on March 20, 2003

12 Summary Summary Y

Nuclear Safety - Maintained at All Times, with Improved Reliability Y

Quality Approach - Meets Applicable IEEE Codes & Standards Y

Need for Upgrade - Reliability, Obsolescence Issues Y

Proven Platform - In Use at Keowee & Around the World Y

Precedents Exist - SSPS, DPPS, PPS Y

Commitment - We will Support NRC Review Y

NRC Response - Need NRC Position on Key Issues by 11/1/05

13 Discussion and Questions & Answers