Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Results
Other: ML032020526, ML032060316, ML033040017, ML040420040, ML040760831, ML040830646, ML040840483, ML040890917, ML040970488, ML040980602, ML041000245, ML041000258, ML041140337, ML042230368, ML042300171, ML043560170, ML050420463, ML050600059, ML050610153, ML050660027
|
MONTHYEARML0319606822003-07-14014 July 2003 Request for Additional Information - Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0320205262003-07-21021 July 2003 Notice of Consideration for Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Other ML0320303472003-07-22022 July 2003 Memo - Transmittal of Draft Requests for Information on MOX to Licensee Project stage: Draft Other ML0320603162003-07-25025 July 2003 Ltr, Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: Other ML0322504222003-08-13013 August 2003 Request for Additional Information Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0327500332003-09-23023 September 2003 Mixed Oxide Fuel Land Assembly License Amendment Request Project stage: Request ML0328904052003-10-0101 October 2003 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Use of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0328803702003-10-0101 October 2003 Stations - Response to RAI Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0328100902003-10-0303 October 2003 Stations, Partial Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Use of Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0329705332003-10-28028 October 2003 Draft Letter to Duke Power Requesting Additional Information on Materials Engineering and Environmental Review for MOX Program Project stage: Draft Other ML0330400172003-10-31031 October 2003 Re. MOX Fuel Assemblies and Associated Amendment Requests Project stage: Other ML0332103452003-11-0404 November 2003 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Use of Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0332505302003-11-21021 November 2003 Request for Additional Information (RAI) Re.: Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0335105632003-12-10010 December 2003 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0334503932003-12-11011 December 2003 Draft Letter Requesting Additional Information on MOX LTA Fuel at Catawba Project stage: Draft Other ML0335004082003-12-16016 December 2003 Request for Additional Information Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0335800082003-12-24024 December 2003 Request for Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0402203962004-01-22022 January 2004 Draft Letter Requesting Additional Information on MOX Radiological Consequences Analyses Project stage: Draft Other ML0404200402004-02-0202 February 2004 Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies MOX Fuel Rod Free Volume Project stage: Other ML0405100642004-02-0202 February 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information on the Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Environmental, Radiological, and Materials) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0403500052004-02-0404 February 2004 Request for Additional Information, Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0404906832004-02-20020 February 2004 RAI, Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0407105072004-03-0101 March 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information, Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Radiological) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0407104972004-03-0101 March 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information, Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Security) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0407104922004-03-0101 March 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information Mixied Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Response to RAI ML0407608312004-03-0909 March 2004 Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Criticality Project stage: Other ML0409704702004-03-0909 March 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Security) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0409302002004-03-0909 March 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Security) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0404400252004-03-10010 March 2004 MOX and McGuire Nuclear Stations, Units 1 and 2, Framatome Anp, Inc., MB7863 and MB7864, Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML0408404832004-03-16016 March 2004 Amended Information Regarding Radiological Consequences for MOX Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Other ML0408306462004-03-16016 March 2004 Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Assembly Bow Project stage: Other ML0408909172004-03-26026 March 2004 Withholding from Public Disclosure, Compact Disc, McGuire and Catawba LOCA Input Decks, Proprietary, Framatome Anp, Dated October 3, 2003 Project stage: Other ML0409704882004-03-26026 March 2004 Additional Information Regarding Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies No Significant Hazards Consideration Evaluation & Environmental Review Project stage: Other ML0410002452004-03-30030 March 2004 Catawba FHA for MOX LTA Project stage: Other ML0409806022004-03-31031 March 2004 Fuel Burn-up Limit Commitment Project stage: Other ML0409700462004-04-0505 April 2004 Safety Evaluation for Proposed Amendments to Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications to Allow Insertion of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Approval ML0412701622004-04-13013 April 2004 Response to Request for Additional Information - Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Security) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0411403372004-04-21021 April 2004 Catawba - 04/21/2004 Letter from Margaret J. Bupp to Mark J. Wetterhahn Informing That, Subject to the Board'S Protective Order, Bredl'S Approved Representatives Possess the Requisite Need to Know Re Duke Energy Corp.'S Response to Request. Project stage: Other ML0412105122004-04-30030 April 2004 Westinghouse, Request for Additional Information, Revising the Technical Specification to Allow the Use of Four Mixed Oxide Lead Test Assemblies Project stage: Request ML0412605442004-05-0505 May 2004 5/5/04, Catawba MOX, Non-Safeguards Version of Supplement 1 to Safety Evaluation Security Plan for MOX Fuel Project stage: Approval ML0414002012004-05-19019 May 2004 RAI, Re, Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0421200182004-07-29029 July 2004 Board Notification 2004-10, Supplement 2 to Safety Evaluation for Proposed Amendments to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications to Allow Use of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies Project stage: Approval ML0422303682004-08-10010 August 2004 Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Mixed Oxide Lead Test Assemblies Project stage: Other ML0426601442004-08-31031 August 2004 Duke Energy Corporation Catawba Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2, Proposed Amendments to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications to Allow Insertion of Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Lead Assemblies (Dose Inputs) Project stage: Request ML0428903432004-09-20020 September 2004 Proposed Amendments to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications to Allow Insertion of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Revised Dose Evaluations) Project stage: Request ML0427901242004-09-29029 September 2004 Request for Additional Information Concerning Mixed Oxide Lead Fuel Assemblies Project stage: RAI ML0410002582004-09-30030 September 2004 Catawba MOX for AST Weir Project stage: Other ML0428600502004-10-0707 October 2004 Request for Additional Information, Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Test Project stage: RAI ML0435601702004-12-10010 December 2004 Proposed Amendments to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications to Allow Insertion of Mixed Oxide Fuel Lead Assemblies (Additional Information on Revised Does Evaluations) Project stage: Other ML0504204632005-02-14014 February 2005 EA, No Significant Impact of Using MOX Lead Test Assemblies Project stage: Other 2004-02-20
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Technical Specifications
MONTHYEARML24017A0652024-03-0808 March 2024 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 319 and 315 to Technical Specification 3.7.11, Control Room Area Chill Water System (Cracws) ML23195A0782023-08-29029 August 2023 Issuance of Amendments Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler TSTF-554, Revision 1 ML22263A0432022-09-0707 September 2022 Editorial Change to SLC 16.10-5 ML20174A0452020-08-0404 August 2020 Issuance of Amendment No. 306 to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.3, RCS (Reactor Coolant System) Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits RA-17-0051, Supplement to License Amendment Request Proposing Changes to Catawba and McGuire Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating2017-11-21021 November 2017 Supplement to License Amendment Request Proposing Changes to Catawba and McGuire Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating RA-17-0001, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-529, Clarify Use and Application Rules2017-07-18018 July 2017 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-529, Clarify Use and Application Rules ML17066A3742017-04-26026 April 2017 Issuance of Amendments Re. Application to Revise TSs to Adopt TSTF-427, Rev. 2, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (CAC Nos. MF8039 Through MF8049) ML16124A6942016-06-0202 June 2016 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Changes to Technical Specification 3.4.1, RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits ML16081A3332016-04-29029 April 2016 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate ML16075A3012016-04-26026 April 2016 Issuance of Amendments Regarding the Revision of the Steam Generator Technical Specifications to Reflect the Adoption of TSTF-510(CAC Nos. MF6139,MF6140,MF6141,MF6142,MF6143,MF6144. ML16082A0382016-04-18018 April 2016 Issuance of License Amendment Regarding Emergency Action Level Scheme Change ML16067A2292016-04-0808 April 2016 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Removal of Obsolete Technical Specification Requirements ML16007A1762016-01-12012 January 2016 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Non-Conservative Technical Specification Allowable Value ML15320A3332015-12-18018 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Non-Conservative Technical Specifications Allowable Value ML15133A4532015-06-11011 June 2015 McGuire Nuclear Station, Oconee Nuclear Station - Issuance of Amendments Regarding Changes to Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Milestone 8 ML15063A2712015-04-14014 April 2015 Issuance of Amendments Technical Specification 3.1.3, Moderator Temperature Coefficient and TS 5.6.5, Core Operating Limits Report. ML15027A3662015-03-25025 March 2015 Issuance of Amendments DPC-NE-3001-P, Multidimensional Reactor Transients and Safety Analysis Physics Parameters Methodology ML15002A3242015-02-12012 February 2015 McGuire Nuclear Station, and Oconee Nuclear Station - Issuance of Amendments Regarding Changes to Organization, Unit Staff Responsibility, Unit Staff Qualifications, Programs and Manuals, and High Radiation Areas CNS-14-076, License Amendment Request (LAR) for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (Mur) Power Uprate2014-06-23023 June 2014 License Amendment Request (LAR) for Measurement Uncertainty Recapture (Mur) Power Uprate ML14056A2172014-02-27027 February 2014 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.4, Remote Shutdown System (TAC MF3473&74) ML12194A2182012-07-0909 July 2012 Response to NRC Request for Additional Information on Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) and Bases Amendment TS and Bases 3.7.8, Nuclear Service Water System (Nsws) ML12038A1732012-02-0101 February 2012 Proposed Tech Specs Amendment TS 3.4.13, TS 5.5.9, TS 5.6.8, License Amendment Request to Revise TS for Permanent Alternate Repair Criteria ML1106705362011-03-29029 March 2011 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revision of the Technical Specifications to Relocate Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program Using a Risk-Informed Justification ML1032700112010-12-20020 December 2010 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revision of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.4 DC Sources - Operating ML1026405372010-09-27027 September 2010 Issuance of Amendment Regarding the Steam Generator Program. ML1025601442010-09-0909 September 2010 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Amendment TS 5.5.9, Steam Generator (SG) Program TS 5.6.8, Steam Generator (SG) Tube Inspection Report License Amendment Request to Revise TS for Alternate Repair Criteria ML1021605622010-08-0202 August 2010 Notice of Enforcement Discretion Request, Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, TS 3.78, Nuclear Service Water System, TS 3.7.5, Auxiliary Feedwater System, TS 3.6.6, Containment Spray System. ML0925300882010-06-28028 June 2010 License Amendment, Issuance of Amendments Regarding Technical Specification Change to Allow Manual Operation of the Containment Spray System (TAC Nos. MD9752 and MD9753) ML1017303882010-04-28028 April 2010 Proposed Technical Specifications Amendment TS 5.5.9, Steam Generator Program, TS 5.6.8, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report, License Amendment Request to Revise TS for Alternate Repair Criteria ML1009201602010-03-31031 March 2010 Application for Technical Specification Change Regarding Risk-Informed Justification for the Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements to a Licensee Controlled Program ML0935600772009-12-15015 December 2009 Technical Specifications Revision Request to Adopt TSTF-490, Rev. 0, Deletion of E Bar Definition and Revision to RCS Specific Activity. ML0923805882009-10-30030 October 2009 License Amendment, Implement Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Changes Travelers TSTF-479, Revision 0, Changes to Reflect Revision (Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Section 50.55a) 10 CFR 50.55a,.. ML0924003112009-09-21021 September 2009 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Proposed Implementation of TSTF-511, Revision 0, Eliminate Working Hour Restrictions from Ts. 5.2.2 to Support Compliance with 10 CFR Part 26. Catawba Units 1& 2, McGuire, Units 1 & 2, Oconee, Units 1, 2, & ML0919503552009-07-0101 July 2009 License Amendment Request to Support Plant Modifications to the Nuclear Instrumentation System ML0914102832009-05-18018 May 2009 License Amendment Request to Revise the Definition of Shutdown Margin (SDM) ML0905402522009-02-19019 February 2009 Proposed Technical Specifications Amendment TS 5.5.9, Steam Generator Program, TS 5.6-8, Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report. ML0835704702008-12-18018 December 2008 Units 1 &2 - Proposed Technical Specification Amendment to Relax Completion Times and Surveillance Intervals for the Reactor Trip System Instrumentation TS 3.3.1, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation. ML0828800982008-10-0808 October 2008 Proposed Technical Specifications and Bases Amendment, TS and Bases Administrative Changes ML0819803572008-07-15015 July 2008 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Emergency Amendment Regarding One-Time Extension of the Auxiliary Feedwater System and the Containment Spray System Allowed Outage Time ML0817700602008-06-23023 June 2008 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) and Bases Amendment, TS and Bases 3.7.8, Nuclear Service Water System, Response to Request for Additional Information ML0806304962008-03-28028 March 2008 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendments Regarding a Change in Corporate Name of License & Oconee Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (TAC Nos. MD5156 - MD5162) ML0731803132007-11-0808 November 2007 Tech Spec Pages for Amendments 238 and 234 Regarding Emergency Core Cooling System Strainer Modification ML0730904132007-10-31031 October 2007 Technical Specifications, Issuance of Amendment Regarding Technical Specification 5.5.9 Steam Generator Tube Surveillance Program ML0730604052007-10-31031 October 2007 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 237 Regarding Extension of Time Limit to Complete Emergency Core Cooling Systems Sump Modification ML0717703102007-06-25025 June 2007 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Emergency Diesel Generator Testing (TAC Nos. MD3217 and MD3218) - Technical Specifications ML0707903972007-03-19019 March 2007 Tech Spec Pages for Amendments 235 and 231 Regarding Snubbers, TSTF-372, Rev. 4 ML0635303422006-12-0707 December 2006 Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Amendments TS 3.7.10 (Catawba)/Ts 3.7.9 (McGuire) - Control Room Area Ventilation System (Cravs) TS 3.7.11 (Catawba)/Ts 3.7.10 (McGuire) - Control Room Area Chilled Water System (Cracws) ML0629003532006-09-30030 September 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendments 234 and 230, Revising Reactor Coolant Systems Leakage Detection Instrumentation ML0627105962006-09-27027 September 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendments 233 and 229 Revised Storage Criteria for Low-enriched Uranium Fuel ML0626901142006-09-25025 September 2006 Technical Specifications Revision of Temperature Limits for the Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond 2024-03-08
[Table view] |
Text
Spent Fuel Assembly Storage 3.7.16 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS 3.7.16 Spent Fuel Assembly Storage LCO 3.7.16 The combination of initial enrichment and burnup of each new or spent fuel assembly stored in the spent fuel pool storage racks shall be within the following configurations:
- a. Unrestricted storage of fuel meeting the criteria of Table 3.7.16-1; or
- b. Restricted storage in accordance with Figure 3.7.16-1, of fuel which does not meet the criteria of Table 3.7.16-1; or
- c. Restricted storage, in accordance with Figure 3.7.16-1, of MOX fuel assemblies as Restricted Fuel.
APPLICABILITY: Whenever any fuel assembly is stored in the spent fuel pool.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Requirements of the A.1 -------------- NOTE-------------
LCO not met. LCO 3.0.3 is not applicable.
Initiate action to move the Immediately noncomplying fuel assembly to the correct location.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.16.1 Verify by administrative means the planned spent fuel Prior to storing the pool location is acceptable for the fuel assembly being fuel assembly in stored. the spent fuel pool Catawba Units 1 and 2 3.7.1 6-1 Amendment Nos. 220 and 215
Spent Fuel Assembly Storage 3.7.16 si RESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED
~-`
FUEL FUEL FUEL
,:,,; :..- - ., '. :,I
':; '- - ' :['.,,1 I' RESTRICTED RESTRICTED FUEL FUEL I
........- '1;
<:Li rr RSTRICTED FUEL
!i LL Ii Restricted Fuel: Fuel which: a) does not meet the requirements of Table 3.7.16-1 for Unrestricted Fuel; or b) is a mixed oxide fuel assembly with a maximum nominal fissile plutonium concentration of 4.15 weight percent and a maximum nominal U-235 enrichment of 0.35 weight percent. (Fuel defined for Unrestricted Storage in Table 3.7.16-1, or non-fuel components, or an empty location may be placed in restricted fuel locations as needed)
Filler Location: Either fuel which meets the minimum burnup requirements of Table 3.7.16-2, or an empty cell.
Boundary Condition: Any row bounded by an Unrestricted Storage Area shall contain a combination of restricted fuel assemblies and filler locations arranged such that no restricted fuel assemblies are adjacent to each other. Example: In the figure above, row 1 or column 1 can not be adjacent to an Unrestricted Storage Area, but row 4 or column 4 can be.
Figure 3.7.16-1 Required 3 out of 4 Loading Pattern for Restricted Storage Catawba Units 1 and 2 3.7.16-4 Amendment Nos.Z 20 and 215
Design Features 4.0 4.0 DESIGN FEATURES 4.1 Site Location Catawba Nuclear Station is located in the north central portion of South Carolina approximately six miles north of Rock Hill and adjacent to Lake Wylie. The station center is located at latitude 35 degrees, 3 minutes, 5 seconds north and longitude 81 degrees, 4 minutes, 10 seconds west. The corresponding Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates are E 493, 660 and N 3, 878, 558, zone 17.
4.2 Reactor Core 4.2.1 Fuel Assemblies The reactor shall contain 193 fuel assemblies. Each assembly shall consist of a matrix of either ZIRLOT m or Zircalloy fuel rods with an initial composition of natural or slightly enriched uranium dioxide (UO2) as fuel material.* Limited I substitutions of ZIRLOYm, zirconium alloy, or stainless steel filler rods for fuel rods, in accordance with approved applications of fuel rod configurations, may be used. Fuel assemblies shall be limited to those fuel designs that have been analyzed with applicable NRC staff approved codes and methods and shown by tests or analyses to comply with all fuel safety design bases. A limited number of lead test assemblies that have not completed representative testing may be placed in nonlimiting core regions.
- A maximum of four lead assemblies containing mixed oxide fuel and M5T cladding may be inserted into the Unit 1 or Unit 2 reactor core.
4.2.2 Control Rod Assemblies The reactor core shall contain 53 control rod assemblies. The control material shall be silver indium cadmium and boron carbide as approved by the NRC.
4.3 Fuel Storage 4.3.1 Criticality 4.3.1.1 The spent fuel storage racks are designed and shall be maintained with:
(continued)
Catawba Units 1 and 2 4.0-1 Amendment Nos.220 and 215
Design Features 4.0 4.0 DESIGN FEATURES 4.3 Fuel Storage (continued)
- a. Fuel assemblies having a maximum nominal U-235 enrichment of 5.0 weight percent or mixed oxide fuel assemblies having a maximum nominal fissile plutonium concentration up to 4.15 weight percent and a maximum nominal U-235 enrichment of 0.35 weight percent;
- b. keff < 0.95 if fully flooded with unborated water, which includes an allowance for uncertainties as described in Section 9.1 of the UFSAR; and
- c. A nominal 13.5 inch center to center distance between fuel assemblies placed in the fuel storage racks.
4.3.1.2 The new fuel storage racks are designed and shall be maintained with:
- a. Fuel assemblies having a maximum nominal U-235 enrichment of 5.0 weight percent;
- b. ken < 0.95 if fully flooded with unborated water, which includes an allowance for uncertainties as described in Section 9.1 of the UFSAR;
- c. k8,f < 0.98 if moderated by aqueous foam, which includes an allowance for uncertainties as described in Section 9.1 of the UFSAR; and
- d. A nominal 21 inch center to center distance between fuel assemblies placed in the storage racks.
4.3.2 Drainage The spent fuel storage pool is designed and shall be maintained to prevent inadvertent draining of the pool below elevation 596 ft.
4.3.3 Capacity The spent fuel storage pool is designed and shall be maintained with a storage capacity limited to no more than 1418 fuel assemblies.
Catawba Units 1 and 2 4.0-2 Amendment Nos.220 and 215
Reporting Requirements 5.6 5.6 Reporting Requirements 5.6.5 CORE OPERATING LIMITS REPORT (COLR) (continued)
- 12. DPC-NE-2008-P-A, "Fuel Mechanical Reload Analysis Methodology Using TACO3" (DPC Proprietary).
- 13. WCAP-10054-P-A, 'Westinghouse Small Break ECCS Evaluation Model Using the NOTRUMP Code" (A Proprietary).
- 14. DPC-NE-2009-P-A, "Westinghouse Fuel Transition Report" (DPC Proprietary).
- 15. WCAP-12945-P-A, Volume 1 and Volumes 2-5, "Code Qualification Document for Best-Estimate Loss of Coolant Analysis" (W Proprietary).
- 16. DPC-NE-1005P-A, "Duke Power Nuclear Design Methodology Using CASMO-4/SIMULATE-3 MOX," (DPC Proprietary).
- 17. BAW-1 0231 P-A, "COPERNIC Fuel Rod Design Computer Code,"
(Framatome ANP Proprietary).
The COLR will contain the complete identification for each of the Technical Specifications referenced topical reports used to prepare the COLR (i.e., report number, title, revision number, report date or NRC SER date, and any supplements).
- c. The core operating limits shall be determined such that all applicable limits (e.g., fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) limits, nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits) of the safety analysis are met.
- d. The COLR, including any midcycle revisions or supplements, shall be provided upon issuance for each reload cycle to the NRC.
5.6.6 Ventilation Systems Heater Report When a report is required by LCO 3.6.10, "Annulus Ventilation System (AVS),"
LCO 3.7.10, "Control Room Area Ventilation System (CRAVS)," LCO 3.7.12, Auxiliary Building Filtered Ventilation Exhaust System (ABFVES)," LCO 3.7.13, "Fuel Handling Ventilation Exhaust System (FHVES)," or LCO 3.9.3, "Containment Penetrations," a report shall be submitted within the following 30 days. The report shall outline the reason for the inoperability and the planned actions to return the systems to OPERABLE status.
(continued)
Catawba Units 1 and 2 5.6-5 Amendment Nos.220 and 215
Spent Fuel Assembly Storage B 3.7.16 B 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS B 3.7.16 Spent Fuel Assembly Storage BASES BACKGROUND The spent fuel storage rack (Ref. 1) is limited to a capacity of 1418 fuel assemblies. The spent fuel storage rack is designed to accommodate fuel with a maximum nominal enrichment of 5.0 wt% U-235 (maximum tolerance of + 0.05 wt%) which have accumulated minimum burnups greater than or equal to the minimum qualifying burnups in Table 3.7.16-
- 1. The storage rack can also accommodate mixed oxide fuel assemblies with a maximum nominal fissile plutonium concentration up to 4.15 weight percent (maximum tolerance of +/- 0.075 weight percent fissile Pu) and a maximum nominal Uranium-235 enrichment of 0.35 weight percent. The mixed oxide fuel assembly design is radially zoned with fuel rods at three different plutonium concentrations. The nominal fissile plutonium concentration limit is the weighted average for the entire fuel assembly.
Fuel assemblies not meeting the criteria of Table 3.7.16-1 shall be stored in accordance with Figure 3.7.16-1.
The water in the spent fuel pool normally contains soluble boron, which results in large subcriticality margins under actual operating conditions.
However, the NRC guidelines, based upon the accident condition in which all soluble poison is assumed to have been lost, specify that the limiting kelf of 0.95 be evaluated in the absence of soluble boron. Hence, the design of the spent fuel storage racks is based on the use of unborated water, which maintains the spent fuel pool in a subcritical condition during normal operation when fully loaded. The double contingency principle discussed in ANSI N-16.1-1975 and the April 1978 NRC letter (Ref. 2) allows credit for soluble boron under other abnormal or accident conditions, since only a single accident need be considered at one time. For example, the most severe accident scenario is associated with the accidental misleading of a fuel assembly. This could potentially increase the reactivity of the spent fuel pool. To mitigate these postulated criticality related accidents, boron is dissolved in the pool water. Safe operation of the spent fuel pool storage rack with no movement of assemblies may therefore be achieved by controlling the location of each assembly in accordance with the accompanying LCO.
Prior to movement of an assembly, it is necessary to perform SR 3.7.15.1.
Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.16-1 Revision No. 1
Spent Fuel Assembly Storage B 3.7.16 BASES APPLICABLE The hypothetical accidents can only take place during or as a result SAFETY ANALYSES of the movement of an assembly (Ref. 3). For these accident occurrences, the presence of soluble boron in the spent fuel pool (controlled by LCO 3.7.15, "Spent Fuel Pool Boron Concentration")
prevents criticality in the spent fuel pool storage racks. By closely controlling the movement of each assembly and by checking the location of each assembly after movement, the time period for potential accidents may be limited to a small fraction of the total operating time. During the remaining time period with no potential for accidents, the operation may be under the auspices of the accompanying LCO.
The configuration of fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool satisfies Criterion 2 of 10 CFR 50.36 (Ref. 4).
LCO The restrictions on the placement of fuel assemblies within the spent fuel pool, in accordance with Table 3.7.16-1, in the accompanying LCO, ensures the keff of the spent fuel pool will always remain < 0.95, assuming the pool to be flooded with unborated water. Fuel assemblies not meeting the criteria of Table 3.7.16-1 shall be stored in accordance with Figure 3.7.16-1 and Table 3.7.16-2.
APPLICABILITY This LCO applies whenever any fuel assembly is stored in the spent fuel pool.
ACTIONS A.1 Required Action A.1 is modified by a Note indicating that LCO 3.0.3 does not apply.
When the configuration of fuel assemblies stored in the spent fuel pool is not in accordance with the LCO, the immediate action is to initiate action to make the necessary fuel assembly movement(s) to bring the configuration into compliance.
If unable to move irradiated fuel assemblies while in MODE 5 or 6, LCO 3.0.3 would not be applicable. If unable to move irradiated fuel assemblies while in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the action is independent of reactor operation. Therefore, inability to move fuel assemblies is not sufficient reason to require a reactor shutdown.
Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.1 6-2 Revision No. 1
Spent Fuel Assembly Storage B 3.7.16 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.16.1 REQUIREMENTS This SR verifies by administrative means that the fuel assembly is in accordance with the configurations specified in the accompanying LCO.
REFERENCES 1. UFSAR, Section 9.1.2.
- 2. Double contingency principle of ANSI N16.1-1975, as specified in the April 14, 1978 NRC letter (Section 1.2) and implied in the proposed revision to Regulatory Guide 1.13 (Section 1.4, Appendix A).
- 3. UFSAR, Section 15.7.4.
- 4. 10 CFR 50.36, Technical Specifications, (c)(2)(ii).
Catawba Units 1 and 2 B 3.7.1 6-3 Revision No. 1