|
---|
Category:Congressional Correspondence
MONTHYEARML18011A0852018-01-30030 January 2018 Letter to Senator Cory Booker from Chairman Svinicki Regarding Constituent Questions Regarding the Decommissioning of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station in Lacey Township, New Jersey ML17356A0342017-12-21021 December 2017 12-21-17 Acknowledgement Letter to Senator Cory Booker - Oyster Creek ML13043A9402013-02-27027 February 2013 G20130075/LTR-13-0071 - Letter to Sen. F. Lautenberg from Chairman Macfarlane Responds to Concerns Regarding the Safety of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Following Hurricane Sandy ML13035A2612013-02-22022 February 2013 Letter to Sen. R. Menendez from Chairman Allison Macfarlane Oyster Creek Generating Station and Impact of Hurricane Sandy on the Plant ML13035A2642013-02-22022 February 2013 Ltr. to Sen. R. Menendez from Chairman Allison Macfarlane - Oyster Creek Generating Station - Enclosure ML13029A6122013-01-25025 January 2013 G20130075/LTR-13-0071 - Ltr. Senator Frank R. Lautenberg Update on Actions Being Taken by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Address Safety Concerns That Have Been Reported at the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Following Supersto ML13017A0402013-01-14014 January 2013 G20130037/LTR-13-0043 - Ltr. Senator Robert Menendez Provides Questions Concerning the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant ML12187A2342012-06-0606 June 2012 G20120474/LTR-12-0306/EDATS: SECY-2012-0341 - Sen. Robert Menendez Ltr. Safety of Our Aging Nuclear Power Plants with Focus on Oyster Creek ML13218A0992012-03-28028 March 2012 03-28-12 LTR-12-0125 Letter from Honorable Robert Menendez and Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg on Meeting Held on March 28, 2012 to Discuss the Annual Safety Assessment of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant ML11264A0902011-09-13013 September 2011 Comment (8) of John Runyan, on Behalf of Self, on Consideration of Rulemaking to Address Prompt Remediation of Residual Radioactivity During Operations CY-92-223, G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 19712011-07-14014 July 2011 G20110523/LTR-11-0411/EDATS: SECY-2011-0411 - Ltr. from Rep. E.J. Markey to Chairman Jaczko NRC Safety Requirements for Reactors Granted Construction Permits Prior to 1971 ML11188A0052011-06-23023 June 2011 G20110496/LTR-11-0386/EDATS: SECY-2011-0390 - Rep. Jon Runyan Ltr. June 2011 Gao Report Entitled, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Oversight of Underground Piping Systems Commensurate with Risk, But Proactive Measures Could Help Address Futur ML1014107522010-05-20020 May 2010 G20100323/LTR-10-0235/EDATS: SECY-2010-0287 - Ltr Fm Senator Robert Menendez Oyster Creek - Tritium Leak ML0916001912009-11-13013 November 2009 G20090312/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0345 - Robert Menendez Ltr. Engaging Sandia National Laboratory to Review the Analyses of the Integrity of the Oyster Creek Drywell Liner ML0915201382009-10-27027 October 2009 G20090291/LTR-09-0211/EDATS: SECY-2009-0249 - Ltr to Representative Christopher Smith Fm Chairman Gregory Jaczko Relicensing Process for Oyster Creek ML0915604112009-07-27027 July 2009 G20090306/LTR-09-02291/EDATS: SECY-2009-0229 - Ltr to Congressman John Adler from Chairman Jaczko Oyster Creek Relicensing Process ML0914805812009-05-27027 May 2009 G20090306/LTR-09-0229/EDATS: SECY-2009-0256 - Rep. John Ader, Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant - Relicensing Process ML0915301592009-05-21021 May 2009 G20090312/EDATS: OEDO-2009-0345 - Robert Menendez Ltr. Engaging Sandia National Laboratory to Review the Analyses of the Integrity of the Oyster Creek Drywell Liner ML0914000662009-05-18018 May 2009 G20090291/LTR-09-0211/EDATS: SECY-2009-0249 - Representative Christopher Smith Relicensing Process for Oyster Creek ML0932006292009-05-0606 May 2009 Letter from Senator Connors and Assemblyman Rumpf and Pelt, to Commissioner Mauriello, Oyster Creek Generating Station - Tritium - Additional Request Regarding Briefing ML0903603812009-02-0303 February 2009 Letter to Chairman Klein from Christopher H. Smith, U.S. Congress, Request the NRC Postpone the Affirmation Session and Any Decision on Extending the Operating License Be Deferred Etc ML0903604032009-02-0303 February 2009 Letter to Chariman Klein from John Adler, U.S. Congress - Request the NRC Postpone the Scheduled Affirmation Until Recommendations by Two NRC Advisory Boards Are Further Reviewed ML0906305672009-02-0303 February 2009 G20090108/LTR-09-0037/EDATS: SECY-2009-0084 - Ltr. from Rep. John Adler, Frank Lobbiondo, and Rush Holt Postponement of Commission Decision on Relicensing of the Oyster Creek ML0901406652009-01-29029 January 2009 G20090009/LTR-08-0614/EDATS: SECY-2009-0008 Congressman Christopher Smith Ltr. Oyster Creek Refueling and Maintenance Shutdown ML0900703332008-12-0404 December 2008 G20090009/LTR-08-0614/EDATS: SECY-2009-0008 - Ltr. Representative Christopher H. Smith Oyster Creek Refueling and Maintenance Shutdown RA-08-114, NRC Response to J. Tauro - Grandmothers, Mothers, and More for Energy Safety (Grammes) Regarding Oyster Creek2008-06-23023 June 2008 NRC Response to J. Tauro - Grandmothers, Mothers, and More for Energy Safety (Grammes) Regarding Oyster Creek ML0817504282008-06-23023 June 2008 NRC Response to J. Tauro - Grandmothers, Mothers, and More for Energy Safety (Grammes) Regarding Oyster Creek ML0812600052008-05-16016 May 2008 G20080283/EDATS: SECY-2008-0245/LTR-08-0223 - Rep. Chris Smith & Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr from R. W. Borchardt Oyster Creek License Renewal Application ML0811603062008-04-25025 April 2008 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to the Honorable Jim Saxton and the Honorable Chris Smith in Response to Their 04/17/08 Letter ML0811604202008-04-17017 April 2008 G20080283/EDATS: SECY-2008-0245/LTR-08-0223 - Ltr. Rep. Chris Smith & Rep. Jim Saxton Oyster Creek License Renewal Application ML0704400392007-03-16016 March 2007 G20070092/LTR-07-0087 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Re Oyster Creek - Floor Structure of the Spent Fuel Pool ML0703804812007-01-30030 January 2007 G20070092/LTR-07-0087 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Re Oyster Creek - Floor Structure of the Spent Fuel Pool ML0702505002007-01-18018 January 2007 LTR-07-0041 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr. Re Urges the NRC to Grant New Jersey'S Request for a Hearing Concerning the Oyster Creek Generating Station ML0627202102006-10-30030 October 2006 G20060809/LTR-06-0482 - Rep. Jim Saxton, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Rep. Robert E. Andrews, Rep. Rush Holt, Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility ML0628903322006-10-10010 October 2006 Letters from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Six Members of Congress Responding to Their 09/26/06 Letter (Also Enclosed) Re Effects of Water Leakage and Corrosiion on the Structural Integrity of the Containment Wall of the Oyster Creek Reactor ML0627200182006-09-26026 September 2006 G20060809/LTR-06-0482 - Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Rep. Jim Saxton, Rep. Robert E. Andrews, Rep. Rush Holt, Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility ML0623000762006-08-25025 August 2006 G20060714/LTR-06-401 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr. Re Comments Regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Deis) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for Oyster Creek Generating Facility ML0624800412006-08-0909 August 2006 2006/08/09-Comment (2) of Jim Saxton Opposing Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility in Forked River, New Jersey ML0624204412006-08-0909 August 2006 Letter from Representative Saxton Regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0622800402006-08-0909 August 2006 G20060714/LTR-06-0401 - Ltr. Rep. Jim Saxton Comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Deis) Issued as Part of the Operating License Renewal Process for the Oyster Creek Generating Facility ML0614202402006-06-0505 June 2006 2006/06/05-G20060495 - Rep. Robert Andrews Ltr. EDO Re License Renewal Application of Oyster Creek ML0613603432006-05-0505 May 2006 G20060495 - Rep. Robert Andrews Ltr. Re License Renewal Application of Oyster Creek ML0609406252006-03-24024 March 2006 2006/03/24-Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Congressman Smith Responding to His 02/16/06 Letter Requesting That a Hearing Be Held on the License Renewal Application for Oyster Creek ML0604507462006-03-16016 March 2006 G20060110/LTR-06-0055 - Representative Jim Saxton Ltr. Re Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Ultrasonic Testing ML0606003172006-02-27027 February 2006 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Congressman Andrews Responding to His 02/06/06 Letter (Also Enclosed) Regarding the Oyster Creek Proceeding ML0604702492006-02-14014 February 2006 Letter from Annette L. Vietti-Cook to Congressman Saxton Responding to His 01/27/06 Letter (Also Enclosed) Regarding the Oyster Creek Proceeding ML0603401252006-01-27027 January 2006 G20060110/LTR-06-0055 - Representative Jim Saxton Ltr. Re Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Ultrasonic Testing ML0522800492005-09-14014 September 2005 G20050560/LTR-05-0406 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Comprehensive Review of Exelon Corporation Renewal Application to Extend the Operating License of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0522201772005-08-0303 August 2005 G20050560/LTR-05-0406 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Comprehensive Review of Exelon Corporation Renewal Application to Extend the Operating License of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML0515402332005-05-23023 May 2005 G20050400/LTR-05-0284 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Site-Specific Vulnerability Analysis on the Spent Fuel Pool for Oyster Creek 2018-01-30
[Table view] Category:Letter
MONTHYEARIR 07200015/20244012024-10-30030 October 2024 NRC Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Report No. 07200015/2024401 ML24303A2822024-10-29029 October 2024 License Termination Plan Supplemental Submittal for Technical Bases Documents ML24284A1972024-10-10010 October 2024 Cover Letter Oyster Creek, License Termination Plan Acceptance Review ML24269A0462024-10-0404 October 2024 Cover Letter for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, License Amendment Request, License Termination Plan, Acceptance Review Request for Additional Information ML24274A0822024-09-25025 September 2024 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Plan, Training Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan, Revisions 1 and 2 ML24240A1692024-09-18018 September 2024 Cy 2023 Summary of Decommissioning Trust Fund Status IR 05000219/20240022024-09-0505 September 2024 – NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2024002 and 07200015/2024001 PNP 2024-030, Update Report for Holtec Decommissioning International Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program Rev. 3 and Palisades Transitioning Quality Assurance Plan, Rev 02024-08-0202 August 2024 Update Report for Holtec Decommissioning International Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program Rev. 3 and Palisades Transitioning Quality Assurance Plan, Rev 0 ML24214A0372024-08-0101 August 2024 License Amendment Request to Revise Renewed Facility Operating License to Add License Condition 2.C.(18) to Include License Termination Plan Requirements ML24179A1842024-07-23023 July 2024 June 20, 2024, Clarification Call on Preapplication Readiness Assessment of the Holtec Decommissioning International License Termination Plan ML24151A6482024-06-0303 June 2024 Changes in Reactor Decommissioning Branch Project Management Assignments for Some Decommissioning Facilities IR 05000219/20240012024-05-14014 May 2024 Decommissioning Intl, LLC Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - NRC Inspection Report No. 05000219/2024001 ML24120A0412024-04-29029 April 2024 Annual Radioactive Environmental Operating Report for 2023 L-24-009, HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 20232024-04-29029 April 2024 HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 2023 ML24120A0402024-04-29029 April 2024 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2023 ML24094A2142024-04-19019 April 2024 Preapplication Readiness Assessment of the Holtec Decommissioning International License Termination Plan L-24-007, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations – Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI)2024-03-29029 March 2024 Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations – Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI) ML24089A2492024-03-29029 March 2024 Reply to Notice of Violation EA-2024-024 ML24085A7902024-03-28028 March 2024 – Preapplication Readiness Assessment of the License Termination Plan ML24081A2882024-03-21021 March 2024 Request Preliminary Review and Feedback on Chapter 6 of the Draft License Termination Plan ML24046A1242024-02-29029 February 2024 – NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2023003 ML24033A3272024-02-0202 February 2024 Request Preliminary Review and Feedback on Chapter 5 of the Draft License Termination Plan ML23342A1162024-01-0909 January 2024 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Plan L-23-019, Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.152023-12-18018 December 2023 Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.15 IR 05000219/20230022023-11-0909 November 2023 EA-23-076 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty - $43,750 - NRC Inspection Report No. 05000219/2023002 ML23286A1552023-10-13013 October 2023 Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) ML23249A1212023-09-0606 September 2023 – NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2023002, Apparent Violation (EA-23-076) ML23242A1162023-08-30030 August 2023 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Report – January 1, 2021 Through December 31, 2022 ML23214A2472023-08-22022 August 2023 – NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2023002 IR 05000219/20230012023-05-31031 May 2023 – NRC Inspection Report No. 05000219/2023001 IR 07200015/20234012023-05-16016 May 2023 – NRC Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Report 07200015/2023401 L-23-004, HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 20222023-04-24024 April 2023 HDI Annual Occupational Radiation Exposure Data Reports - 2022 ML23114A0872023-04-24024 April 2023 Annual Radioactive Environmental Operating Report for 2022 ML23114A0912023-04-24024 April 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2022 L-23-003, Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations2023-03-31031 March 2023 Report on Status of Decommissioning Funding for Reactors and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations ML23088A0382023-03-29029 March 2023 Stations 1, 2, & 3, Palisades Nuclear Plant, and Big Rock Point - Nuclear Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML22361A1022023-02-24024 February 2023 Reactor Decommissioning Branch Project Management Changes for Some Decommissioning Facilities and Establishment of Backup Project Manager for All Decommissioning Facilities IR 05000219/20220022023-02-0909 February 2023 NRC Inspection Report No. 05000219/2022002 ML23031A3012023-02-0808 February 2023 Discontinuation of Radiological Effluent Monitoring Location in the Sewerage System ML23033A5052023-02-0202 February 2023 First Use Notification of NRC Approved Cask RT-100 ML23025A0112023-01-24024 January 2023 LLRW Late Shipment Investigation Report Per 10 CFR 20, Appendix G ML22347A2732022-12-21021 December 2022 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Plan Dated December 21, 2022 ML22297A1432022-12-15015 December 2022 Part 20 App G Exemption Letter L-22-042, Oyster, Pilgrim, Indian Point, Palisades and Big Rock Point - Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.152022-12-14014 December 2022 Oyster, Pilgrim, Indian Point, Palisades and Big Rock Point - Proof of Financial Protection 10 CFR 140.15 IR 07200015/20224012022-12-0606 December 2022 NRC Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Security Inspection Report 07200015/2022401 (Letter & Enclosure 1) ML22280A0762022-11-0202 November 2022 Us NRC Analysis of Holtec Decommissioning Internationals Funding Status Report for Oyster Creek, Indian Point and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML22276A1762022-10-24024 October 2022 Decommissioning International Proposed Revisions to the Quality Assurance Program Approval Forms for Radioactive Material Packages ML22286A1402022-10-13013 October 2022 NRC Confirmatory Order EA-21-041 IR 05000219/20220012022-08-11011 August 2022 NRC Inspection Report 05000219/2022001 ML22215A1772022-08-0303 August 2022 Decommissioning International (HDI) Proposed Revisions to the Quality Assurance Program Approval Forms for Radioactive Material Packages 2024-09-05
[Table view] |
Text
- l OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Oct 05, 2004 10:11 PAPER NUMBER: LTR-04-0616 LOGGING DATE: 10/04/2004 ACTION OFFICE: EDO X6:-Nul wkN AUTHOR: REP Jim Saxton cS DEDMRS REP DEDH AFFILIATION: DEDM ADDRESSEE: George Bush AO DEDR
SUBJECT:
Operating license for Oyster Creek ocA ACTION: Information DISTRIBUTION: RF LETTER DATE: 09/14/2004 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
t~w bem . So -O - kkuS; SGiCY -C
LIM SAXTONCI ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE THIRD:IST ICT. NEW-ERSEr SuecchIr.,ITTEES.
'pN.hCU'SsGOVSAXT: '- -TERRORISM. UNCONVENTIONAL JOIT C TTHREATS AND CAPABILITIES JOINT ECONOM1IC COMMITTEE .g- B CHaIR?.IAt
- VCl CHAsI PROJECTION FORCES RESOURCES COMMIaTEE TOTALFORCE
-ISH5RIES CONISERI.1TaON.TOA FRC WiLCLIFEANDOCEANSSU2COMMIMTBE VICECHAIRMAN
+<. iouge of ztprt~etalttibc5 Uoas1)jington, I¢ 20515 September 14, 2004 The Honorable George W. Bush President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue The White House, DC 20500
Dear President Bush:
The operating license for Oyster Creek, the oldest operating nuclear generating station, located in Lacey Township, New Jersey, is set to expire in 2009. Owners of the plant have made public their intentions to file an application renewal. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidelines advise plant owners to submit license extension applications five years in advance of expiration. Consistent with previous relicensure applications submitted to the NRC, Oyster Creek is poised to be granted a twenty year operating extension, allowing it to continue its reign as the oldest operating nuclear reactor in the nation.
The safety and security of Oyster Creek is a major concern to myself and my constituents.
After 40 years of continued operation, I question whether Oyster Creek is structurally sound to withstand continued operations for an additional 20 years beyond its initial life span. While NRC guidelines maintain that a plant owner must demonstrate the facility's structures and components requiring age management review are in accordance with statutes for license renewal, this amounts to little more than an exercise in paperwork. Extensive on-site analysis must be conducted by an outside party to guarantee there is an acceptable level of safety during the period of extended operation.
Therefore, I respectfully request an Executive Order be issued to conduct an independent safety assessment of the equipment and sustainability of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. I have learned through New Jersey State Senator Leonard Connors, it is believed there is precedent for such an order. and deem this situation of such critical importance that Presidential intervention is warranted.
Thank you for your consideration of this critical safety issue.
Si elV mn Saxton lember of Congress JSijaz J I.I.YIZ5!"Ct 17E 1' .LC'I1iG M rJll :z EET IT XI:T1 *.471.1-1l TEET , 'IAIN5 ..VENIIE
- AS},III
- iCF. CC X - 1OtI1ITIVOLL . :J ..SW O!-0I. - ;AS FlyER ; 1 LW!-:JdS :NERd'-iLL.;JJS'WO2-!35
%4IS%,Tr F0I'EF.Y ~-IirTiED U'I t:,+/-I4P MA1UE0F CL~FISE RS
F:\M8\SAXT0N\SAXTON_053.XML H.L.C.
(06&~nal signature of Mecmber) 108TII CONGRESS 2D SESSION Ho R.
To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to prolide for an independent assess-ment of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station by the National Academy of Sciences prior to any relicensing of that facility.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on A BILL To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to provide for an independent assessment of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station by the National Acad-emy of Sciences prior to any relicensing of that facility.
1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Hlouse of Representa-
= 2 tives of the United States of America ins Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
4 The Congress finds the followiing:
F:WV8\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004
F:\M8\SAXTON\SAXTON-053.XML H.L.C.
2 1 (1) The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Sta-2 tion, operating for over 35 years, is the oldest nu-3 clear facility in the country.
4 (2) More than 3,500,000 people now reside 5 wvithin a 50-mile radius of Oyster Creek.
6 (3) Nuclear power plants have been identified 7 as inviting targets for terrorist attacks.
8 (4) It is necessary to assess the safety, perform-9 ance, and reliability of the Nation's oldest operating 10 reactor.
11 (5) An independent assessment will help in de-12 termining if the plant can continue to maintain ade-13 quate levels of safety 14 SEC. 2. RELICENSING CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES.
15 Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 16 U.S.C. 2232) is amended by adding at the end the fol-17 low ing newv subsection:
18 "e. In determining whether to approve an application 19 for relicensing, the Commission shall evaluate the facility 20 wvitlh respect to health risks, vulnerability to terrorist at-21 tack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to 22 store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and the 23 impact of a nuclear accident.".
FW\V8%091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004
F:\A8\SAXTON\SAXTON_053.XML ]I.L.C.
3 1 SEC. 3. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF OYSTER CREEK NTU 2 CLEAR GENERATING STATION.
3 (a) IN GENERAL.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commis-4 sion shall not relicense the Oyster Creek Nuclear Gener-5 ating Station until-6 (1) at least 90 days have expired after it has 7 transmitted under subsection (e) the recommenda-8 tions from the National Academy, of Sciences; and 9 (2) it has given appropriate consideration to 10 those recommendations.
11 (b) ASSESSMENT BY NATIONAL ACADEMY OF 12 SCIENCES.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall 13 enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of 14 Sciences to provide, wsith respect to the Oyster Creek Nu-15 clear Generating Station, an independent assessment of 16 safety performance along with recommendations for rcli-17 censing and relicensing conditions.
18 (C) FUNCTIONS.-Pursuant to guidelines provide by 19 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the National Acad-20 emy of Sciences shall-21 (1) provide an independent assessment of the 22 conformance of Oyster Creck Nuclear Generating e
23 Station to its design and licensing bases, including 24 appropriate reviews at the site and corporate offices; FAV8\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004
F:\M8\SAXTON\SAXTON_053.XML H.L.C.
4 1 (2) provide an independent assessment of oper-2 ational safety performance, identifying risk factors 3 where appropriate; 4 (3) provide an independent assessment of 5 health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacu-6 ation plans, population increases, ability to store nu-7 clear waste, safety and security record, and the im-8 pact of a nuclear accident; 9 (4) evaluate the effectiveness of licensee self-as-10 sessments, corrective actions, and improvement 11 plans; and 12 (5) determine the cause or causes of safety 13 problems and assess overall performance.
14 (d) ACCESS.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commission 15 shall issue such orders as are necessary to ensure appro-16 priate access for the National Academy of Sciences to 17 carry out this section.
18 (e) REPORT.-Not later than 18 months after the 19 date of enactment of this Act, the Nuclear Regulatory 20 Commission shall transmit to the Congress the report re-21 ceived from the National Academy of Sciences under this 22 section.
F:WB\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004
Oyster Creek Bill Summary 9/10/04 The bill is to require the NRC to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to provide for the establishment of a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) assessment to assist with the relicensing of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant.
Section 1: Congressional findings.
States 5 basic facts about the plant, such as it is the oldest operating plant in the country, more than 3.5 million people live within a 50-mile radius, etc.
Section 2: Relicensing Criteria.
Amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to mandate the NRC evaluate all facilities requesting relicensure with respect to health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and the impact of a nuclear accident.
Section 3: Independent Assessment.
Section 3a: The NRC shall not relicense Oyster Creek until at least 90 days after it has obtained recommendations from the NAS.
Section 3b: Mandates establishment of an Independent Safety Assessment Team (ISAT). Defines the ISAT's purpose to conduct an independent assessment of safety performance, to include recommendations and conditions for relicensing.
Sectior i 3c: Defines functions of the Team.
(1) to provide an independent assessment of conformance of Oyster Creek to its design and licensing bases, including site and corporate offices; (2) to provide an independent assessment of operational safety performance, identifying risk factors; (3) provide an independent assessment of health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and nuclear accident impact.
(4) to evaluate effectiveness of license self-assessment, corrective actions, and improvement plans; (5) to determine the cause of causes of safety problems and assess overall performance.
3d: Defines Access.
Requires the NRC to issue appropriate orders to allow for access to sites by members of the NAS ISAT.
3e: Defines timeline.
Requires the ISAT to report to Congress and the NRC its findings within 18 months.
Main issues with Oyster Creek Ifnefficiency: -A recent GAO study on nuclear power avers NRC review of safety assessments have primarily been paper reviews and are not detailed enough to determine if the plans could actually protect the facility.
-In a letter you sent to President Bush, you said the relicensure process amounts to little more than "an exercise in paperwork."
-Many are starting to understand the NRC's self-assessment policies are not sufficient and more must be done to protect plants.
Relicensure: These items are not taken into account during the relicensure process: -health risks
-vulnerability to terrorist attack
-evacuation plans
-population increases
-ability to store nuclear waste
-safety and security record
-impact of a nuclear accident
-Shouldn't these be the MAIN considerations during the process?
Structure: -The plant opened in 1969, making it 35 years in operation.
-Should a plant built to operate for 35 years continue to operate for an additional 20?
-The structural design of Oyster Creek wvas prohibited 3 years later, if this structure was deemed unfit then, how can it be sound 35 years later?
Safety: -Spent fuel is housed onsite in above ground storage casks.
-Are these containers robust enough to withstand an aerial attack?
-Does Oyster Creek have enough room to continue storing fuel onsite in the event Yucca Mountain doesn't open in the next ten years?
Evacuation: -More than 530,000 people now live in the area of OC, an area that once had only 125,000 people, the second fastest growing area in the state.
-Population swells during the summer put 1 million people in a 10 miles radius, can these people be safely evacuated?
Health: -Only environmental impacts on fish and wildlife are considered, because in 1995 NRC eliminated this from their checklist. Who monitors radioactive emissions and their effect on the community?
Terrorism: -Spent fuiel pools are aboveground, making it more attractive/vulnerable to attacks from aircraft. How are they protected?
Labor: -Spring 2003 strike occurred in because contract negotiations called for layoffs that would compromise worker safety.
-Labor force cut from 850 to 450 since 2000, 25% of those wokers were radiation protection workers.
-Questions of worker safety and accuracy vs. running a profitable plant, which has become more important?