ML042820610

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LTR-04-0665 - Rep. Jim Saxton Ltr Re Operating License for Oyster Creek
ML042820610
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 09/14/2004
From: Saxton J
US HR (House of Representatives)
To: Bush G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, US Executive Office of the President, Office of the White House Counsel
Shared Package
ML043030154 List:
References
CORR-04-0214, LTR-04-0665
Download: ML042820610 (8)


Text

  • l OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Oct 05, 2004 10:11 PAPER NUMBER: LTR-04-0616 LOGGING DATE: 10/04/2004 ACTION OFFICE: EDO X6:-Nul wkN AUTHOR: REP Jim Saxton cS DEDMRS REP DEDH AFFILIATION: DEDM ADDRESSEE: George Bush AO DEDR

SUBJECT:

Operating license for Oyster Creek ocA ACTION: Information DISTRIBUTION: RF LETTER DATE: 09/14/2004 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING:

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:

t~w bem . So -O - kkuS; SGiCY -C

LIM SAXTONCI ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE THIRD:IST ICT. NEW-ERSEr SuecchIr.,ITTEES.

'pN.hCU'SsGOVSAXT: '- -TERRORISM. UNCONVENTIONAL JOIT C TTHREATS AND CAPABILITIES JOINT ECONOM1IC COMMITTEE .g- B CHaIR?.IAt

  • VCl CHAsI PROJECTION FORCES RESOURCES COMMIaTEE TOTALFORCE

-ISH5RIES CONISERI.1TaON.TOA FRC WiLCLIFEANDOCEANSSU2COMMIMTBE VICECHAIRMAN

+<. iouge of ztprt~etalttibc5 Uoas1)jington, I¢ 20515 September 14, 2004 The Honorable George W. Bush President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue The White House, DC 20500

Dear President Bush:

The operating license for Oyster Creek, the oldest operating nuclear generating station, located in Lacey Township, New Jersey, is set to expire in 2009. Owners of the plant have made public their intentions to file an application renewal. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) guidelines advise plant owners to submit license extension applications five years in advance of expiration. Consistent with previous relicensure applications submitted to the NRC, Oyster Creek is poised to be granted a twenty year operating extension, allowing it to continue its reign as the oldest operating nuclear reactor in the nation.

The safety and security of Oyster Creek is a major concern to myself and my constituents.

After 40 years of continued operation, I question whether Oyster Creek is structurally sound to withstand continued operations for an additional 20 years beyond its initial life span. While NRC guidelines maintain that a plant owner must demonstrate the facility's structures and components requiring age management review are in accordance with statutes for license renewal, this amounts to little more than an exercise in paperwork. Extensive on-site analysis must be conducted by an outside party to guarantee there is an acceptable level of safety during the period of extended operation.

Therefore, I respectfully request an Executive Order be issued to conduct an independent safety assessment of the equipment and sustainability of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. I have learned through New Jersey State Senator Leonard Connors, it is believed there is precedent for such an order. and deem this situation of such critical importance that Presidential intervention is warranted.

Thank you for your consideration of this critical safety issue.

Si elV mn Saxton lember of Congress JSijaz J I.I.YIZ5!"Ct 17E 1' .LC'I1iG M rJll :z EET IT XI:T1 *.471.1-1l TEET , 'IAIN5 ..VENIIE

AS},III
iCF. CC X - 1OtI1ITIVOLL . :J ..SW O!-0I. -  ;AS FlyER ; 1 LW!-:JdS :NERd'-iLL.;JJS'WO2-!35

%4IS%,Tr F0I'EF.Y ~-IirTiED U'I t:,+/-I4P MA1UE0F CL~FISE RS

F:\M8\SAXT0N\SAXTON_053.XML H.L.C.

(06&~nal signature of Mecmber) 108TII CONGRESS 2D SESSION Ho R.

To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to prolide for an independent assess-ment of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station by the National Academy of Sciences prior to any relicensing of that facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mr. SAXTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on A BILL To require the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to provide for an independent assessment of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station by the National Acad-emy of Sciences prior to any relicensing of that facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and Hlouse of Representa-

= 2 tives of the United States of America ins Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds the followiing:

F:WV8\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004

F:\M8\SAXTON\SAXTON-053.XML H.L.C.

2 1 (1) The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Sta-2 tion, operating for over 35 years, is the oldest nu-3 clear facility in the country.

4 (2) More than 3,500,000 people now reside 5 wvithin a 50-mile radius of Oyster Creek.

6 (3) Nuclear power plants have been identified 7 as inviting targets for terrorist attacks.

8 (4) It is necessary to assess the safety, perform-9 ance, and reliability of the Nation's oldest operating 10 reactor.

11 (5) An independent assessment will help in de-12 termining if the plant can continue to maintain ade-13 quate levels of safety 14 SEC. 2. RELICENSING CRITERIA FOR NUCLEAR FACILITIES.

15 Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 16 U.S.C. 2232) is amended by adding at the end the fol-17 low ing newv subsection:

18 "e. In determining whether to approve an application 19 for relicensing, the Commission shall evaluate the facility 20 wvitlh respect to health risks, vulnerability to terrorist at-21 tack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to 22 store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and the 23 impact of a nuclear accident.".

FW\V8%091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004

F:\A8\SAXTON\SAXTON_053.XML ]I.L.C.

3 1 SEC. 3. INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT OF OYSTER CREEK NTU 2 CLEAR GENERATING STATION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commis-4 sion shall not relicense the Oyster Creek Nuclear Gener-5 ating Station until-6 (1) at least 90 days have expired after it has 7 transmitted under subsection (e) the recommenda-8 tions from the National Academy, of Sciences; and 9 (2) it has given appropriate consideration to 10 those recommendations.

11 (b) ASSESSMENT BY NATIONAL ACADEMY OF 12 SCIENCES.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall 13 enter into an arrangement with the National Academy of 14 Sciences to provide, wsith respect to the Oyster Creek Nu-15 clear Generating Station, an independent assessment of 16 safety performance along with recommendations for rcli-17 censing and relicensing conditions.

18 (C) FUNCTIONS.-Pursuant to guidelines provide by 19 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the National Acad-20 emy of Sciences shall-21 (1) provide an independent assessment of the 22 conformance of Oyster Creck Nuclear Generating e

23 Station to its design and licensing bases, including 24 appropriate reviews at the site and corporate offices; FAV8\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004

F:\M8\SAXTON\SAXTON_053.XML H.L.C.

4 1 (2) provide an independent assessment of oper-2 ational safety performance, identifying risk factors 3 where appropriate; 4 (3) provide an independent assessment of 5 health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacu-6 ation plans, population increases, ability to store nu-7 clear waste, safety and security record, and the im-8 pact of a nuclear accident; 9 (4) evaluate the effectiveness of licensee self-as-10 sessments, corrective actions, and improvement 11 plans; and 12 (5) determine the cause or causes of safety 13 problems and assess overall performance.

14 (d) ACCESS.-The Nuclear Regulatory Commission 15 shall issue such orders as are necessary to ensure appro-16 priate access for the National Academy of Sciences to 17 carry out this section.

18 (e) REPORT.-Not later than 18 months after the 19 date of enactment of this Act, the Nuclear Regulatory 20 Commission shall transmit to the Congress the report re-21 ceived from the National Academy of Sciences under this 22 section.

F:WB\091004\091004.120 September 10, 2004

Oyster Creek Bill Summary 9/10/04 The bill is to require the NRC to consider certain criteria in relicensing nuclear facilities, and to provide for the establishment of a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) assessment to assist with the relicensing of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant.

Section 1: Congressional findings.

States 5 basic facts about the plant, such as it is the oldest operating plant in the country, more than 3.5 million people live within a 50-mile radius, etc.

Section 2: Relicensing Criteria.

Amends the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to mandate the NRC evaluate all facilities requesting relicensure with respect to health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and the impact of a nuclear accident.

Section 3: Independent Assessment.

Section 3a: The NRC shall not relicense Oyster Creek until at least 90 days after it has obtained recommendations from the NAS.

Section 3b: Mandates establishment of an Independent Safety Assessment Team (ISAT). Defines the ISAT's purpose to conduct an independent assessment of safety performance, to include recommendations and conditions for relicensing.

Sectior i 3c: Defines functions of the Team.

(1) to provide an independent assessment of conformance of Oyster Creek to its design and licensing bases, including site and corporate offices; (2) to provide an independent assessment of operational safety performance, identifying risk factors; (3) provide an independent assessment of health risks, vulnerability to terrorist attack, evacuation plans, population increases, ability to store nuclear waste, safety and security record, and nuclear accident impact.

(4) to evaluate effectiveness of license self-assessment, corrective actions, and improvement plans; (5) to determine the cause of causes of safety problems and assess overall performance.

3d: Defines Access.

Requires the NRC to issue appropriate orders to allow for access to sites by members of the NAS ISAT.

3e: Defines timeline.

Requires the ISAT to report to Congress and the NRC its findings within 18 months.

Main issues with Oyster Creek Ifnefficiency: -A recent GAO study on nuclear power avers NRC review of safety assessments have primarily been paper reviews and are not detailed enough to determine if the plans could actually protect the facility.

-In a letter you sent to President Bush, you said the relicensure process amounts to little more than "an exercise in paperwork."

-Many are starting to understand the NRC's self-assessment policies are not sufficient and more must be done to protect plants.

Relicensure: These items are not taken into account during the relicensure process: -health risks

-vulnerability to terrorist attack

-evacuation plans

-population increases

-ability to store nuclear waste

-safety and security record

-impact of a nuclear accident

-Shouldn't these be the MAIN considerations during the process?

Structure: -The plant opened in 1969, making it 35 years in operation.

-Should a plant built to operate for 35 years continue to operate for an additional 20?

-The structural design of Oyster Creek wvas prohibited 3 years later, if this structure was deemed unfit then, how can it be sound 35 years later?

Safety: -Spent fuel is housed onsite in above ground storage casks.

-Are these containers robust enough to withstand an aerial attack?

-Does Oyster Creek have enough room to continue storing fuel onsite in the event Yucca Mountain doesn't open in the next ten years?

Evacuation: -More than 530,000 people now live in the area of OC, an area that once had only 125,000 people, the second fastest growing area in the state.

-Population swells during the summer put 1 million people in a 10 miles radius, can these people be safely evacuated?

Health: -Only environmental impacts on fish and wildlife are considered, because in 1995 NRC eliminated this from their checklist. Who monitors radioactive emissions and their effect on the community?

Terrorism: -Spent fuiel pools are aboveground, making it more attractive/vulnerable to attacks from aircraft. How are they protected?

Labor: -Spring 2003 strike occurred in because contract negotiations called for layoffs that would compromise worker safety.

-Labor force cut from 850 to 450 since 2000, 25% of those wokers were radiation protection workers.

-Questions of worker safety and accuracy vs. running a profitable plant, which has become more important?