ML041130434

Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate

ML041130434
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	04/14/2004
From:	Jamie Benjamin AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Corp
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2130-04-20085
Download: ML041130434 (163)

Text

AmerGen SM AmerGen Energy Company, LLC www.exeloncorp.com An Exelon Company 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 10 CFR 50.75(0 April 14, 2004 2130-04-20085 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219

Subject:

Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate In accordance with 10 CFR 50.75(0(2), "Reporting and recordk-eeping for decommissioning planning,"

paragraph (0(2), "each power reactor licensee shall at or about 5 years prior to the projected end of operations submit a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate which includes an up-to-date assessment of the major factors that could affect the cost to decommission." Accordingly, attached is a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate for Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS). Although OCGS will be seeking license renewal, this cost estimate is being submitted since the facility operating license for OCGS currently expires on April 9, 2009.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Tom Loomis at 610-765-5510.

Very truly yours,

~~min Vice President - Licensing and R tory Affairs AmerGen Energy Company, LLC Attachment I - Oyster Creek Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis cc:

H. J. Miller, Administrator, USNRC, Region I R. J. Summers, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, OCGS P. S. Tam, Senior Project Manager, USNRC File No. 03035

• coI

ATTACHMENT 1 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE

Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION prepared for AmerGen Energy, LLC prepared by TLG Services, Inc.

Bridgewater, Connecticut March 2004

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Page ii of xvi APPROVALS President/

Quality Assurance Manager Project Manager Project Engineer Technical Manager Thomas S.LaG rdia William A. Cloutier, JrJ

' H 6 J2 6 S

A. Koehl Francis W. ey ore D3ate 04 Date 4$zz/o Date Date TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455O006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iii of xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

v ii-xvi

1.

INTRODUCTION..........................................

1-1 1.1 Objectives of Study..........................................

1-1 1.2 Site Description..........................................

1-1 1.3 Regulatory Guidance..........................................

1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act.........................................

1-4 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts.........................................

1-6 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination.................................... 1-6

2.

DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES

................. 2-1 2.1 DECON.........................................

2-2 2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations.........................................

2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 - Decommissioning Operations.........................................

2-4 2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration.........................................

2-8 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning.........................................

2-9 2.2 SAFSTOR AND DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING 2-9 2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations.........................................

2-10 2.2.2 Period 2 - Dormancy.........................................

2-11 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning..................................... 2-12 2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration.........................................

2-14

3.

COST ESTIMATE..........................................

3-1 3.1 Basis of Estimate.........................................

3-1 3.2 Methodology..........................................

3-1 3.3 Financial Components of the Cost Model.................

........................ 3-3 3.3.1 Contingency.........................................

3-3 3.3.2 Financial Risk.........................................

3-5 3.4 Site-Specific Considerations 3-7 3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management.........................................

3-7 3.4.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components......................................... 3-10 3.4.3 Primary System Components.........................................

3-11 3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser.........................................

3-12 3.4.5 Transportation Methods......................................... 3-12 3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal.........................................

3-13 3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning....................................

3-13 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iv of xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 3.5 Assumptions.................................................

3-14 3.5.1 Estimating Basis................................................. 3-14 3.5.2 Labor Costs.................................................

3-14 3.5.3 Design Conditions.................................................

3-15 3.5.4 General.

................................................. 3-15 3.6 Cost Estimate Summary................................................. 3-17

4.

SCHEDULE ESTIMATE.................................................

4-1 4.1 Schedule Estimate Assumptions..................

............................... 4-1 4.2 Project Schedule.................................................

4-2

5.

RADIOACTIVE WASTES.................................................

5-1

6.

RESULTS.................................................

6-1

7.

REFERENCES.......................................................................................................... 7-1 TABLES Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, DECON.................

.............. xiv Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, Delayed DECON.................. xv Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, SAFSTOR............................ xvi 3.1 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, DECON................................................. 3-18 3.2 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, Delayed DECON......................

............. 3-19 3.3 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, SAFSTOR.............................................. 3-20 5.1 Decommissioning Waste Summary, DECON................................................. 5-3 5.2 Decommissioning Waste Summary, Delayed DECON................................... 5-4 5.3 Decommissioning Waste Summary, SAFSTOR.............................................. 5-5 6.1 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, DECON.................

.............. 6-4 6.2 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, Delayed DECON................. 6-5 6.3 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, SAFSTOR............................ 6-6 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page v of xvi TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE FIGURES 4.1 Activity Schedule.................................

4-3 4.2 Decommissioning Timeline, DECON.................................

4-5 4.3 Decommissioning Timeline, Delayed DECON.................................

4-6 4.4 Decommissioning Timeline, SAFSTOR.................................

4-7 APPENDICES A.

Unit Cost Factor Development.................................

A-1 B.

Unit Cost Factor Listing.................................

B-1 C.

Detailed Cost Analyses, DECON.................................

C-1 D.

Detailed Cost Analyses, Delayed DECON..........

....................... D-1 E.

Detailed Cost Analyses, SAFSTOR.................................

E-1 F.

Work Difficulty Factor Adjustments.................................

F-1 G.

Work Area Designation - GPU STN Index.......................................................... G-1 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Page vi of xvi REVISION LOG No.

,CRA No.

Date 11 Itei Revised Reason forRevision 0

03-22-04 Original Issue TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page vii of xvi EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This report presents estimates of the cost to decommission the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) for the selected decommissioning scenarios following the scheduled cessation of plant operations. The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information, originally developed in an evaluation for the GPU Nuclear Corporation in 1997-99,I11 updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear unit and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects. The updated estimates are designed to provide AmerGen Energy with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear unit.

The primary goal of the decommissioning is the removal and disposal of the contaminated systems and structures so that the plant's operating license can be terminated. The analysis recognizes that spent fuel will be stored at the site in the plant's storage pool and/or in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) until such time that it can transferred to a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) facility.

Consequently, the estimates also include those costs to manage and subsequently decommission these storage facilities.

The estimates are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements.

The estimates incorporate a minimum cooling period of approximately 5%/2 years for the spent fuel that resides in the storage pool when operations cease. In two of the scenarios evaluated, any residual fuel remaining in the pool after the 5Y2-year period is relocated to the ISFSI to await transfer to a DOE facility (the fuel is assumed to remain in the storage pool for the third scenario). The estimates also include the dismantling of non-essential structures and limited restoration of the site.

Alternatives and Regulations The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule adopted on June 27, 1988.[2] In this rule, the NRC set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.

The regulations addressed planning

needs, timing, funding

methods, and "Decommissioning Cost Estimate for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," Document No. G01-1271-003, TLG Services, Inc., February 1999.

2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72 "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page viii of xvi environmental review requirements for decommissioning. The rule also defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB.

DECON is defined as "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations."[31 SAFSTOR is defined as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."[4]

Decommissioning is to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety.

ENTOMB is defined as "the alternative 'in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete; the entombed structure is appropriately maintained and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactive material decays to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property."[ 51 As with the SAFSTOR alternative, decommissioning is currently required to be completed within 60 years.

The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality of the ENTOMB alternative at commercial reactors that generate significant amounts of long-lived radioactive material. In 1997, the Commission directed its staff to re-evaluate this alternative and identify the technical requirements and regulatory actions that would be necessary for entombment to become a viable option. The resulting evaluation provided several recommendations, however, rulemaking has been deferred pending the completion of additional research studies, e.g., on engineered barriers.

In

1996, the NRC published revisions to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process[ 6] The amendments allow for greater public participation 3

Ibid. Page FR24022, Column 3.

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid. Page FR24023, Column 2.

6 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50, and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page ix of xvi and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.

Regulatory Guide 1.184, issued in July 2000, further described the methods and procedures acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing the requirements of the 1996 revised rule relating to the initial activities and major phases of the decommissioning process. The costs and schedules presented in this analysis follow the general guidance and processes described in the amended regulations.

Decommissioning Scenarios for Oyster Creek Three decommissioning scenarios are evaluated for the nuclear unit. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows:

1.

DECON: The operating license expires in April 2009. The first scenario assumes that the total duration of the physical dismantling process is minimized. The existing ISFSI is expanded to accommodate any residual spent fuel remaining from plant operations so as to facilitate the decontamination and dismantling of the power block structures. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2027.

2.

Delayed DECON: In the second scenario, the unit is prepared for an abbreviated period of storage. The spent fuel discharged to the storage pool, once operations cease, remains in the pool until it can be transferred to a DOE facility, i.e., the ISFSI is not used to offload the pool. Decommissioning is delayed until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, i.e., in the year 2027. The unit is then decommissioned.

3.

SAFSTOR: The unit is placed into safe-storage in the third scenario. However, decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the maximum required 60-year period. Spent fuel remaining in the spent fuel storage pool after a minimum cooling period of 5% years is transferred to the ISFSI for interim storage until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2027.

Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61, (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page x of xvi Methodolowv The methodology used to develop the estimate described within this document follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines 17] developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute). This reference describes a unit factor method for determining decommissioning activity costs. The unit factors used in this analysis incorporate site-specific costs and the latest available information on worker productivity in decommissioning.

An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule. The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, and support services such as quality control and security. This systematic approach for assembling decommissioning estimates ensures a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the resulting cost estimate.

Contingency Consistent with cost estimating practice, contingencies are applied to the decontamination and dismantling costs developed as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope, particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur."[8] The cost elements in the estimates are based on ideal conditions; therefore, the types of unforeseeable events that are almost certain to occur in decommissioning, based on industry experience, are addressed through a percentage contingency applied on a line-item basis. This contingency factor is a nearly universal element in. all large-scale construction and demolition projects. It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.

The use and role of contingency within decommissioning estimates is not a safety factor issue. Safety factors provide additional security and address situations that may never occur. Contingency funds, by contrast, are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. Inclusion of contingency is necessary to provide assurance that sufficient funding will be available to accomplish the intended tasks.

7 T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.

8 Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, p. 239.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, 'Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xi of xvi Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposal. With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980,I9] and its Amendments of 1985,110] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders.

New Jersey is a member of the three-state Atlantic Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact, formed after New Jersey formally joined the Northeast Regional Compact. The Barnwell Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility, located in South Carolina, is expected to be available to support the decommissioning of Oyster Creek. It is also assumed that AmerGen Energy can access other disposal sites should it prove cost-effective. As such, rate schedules for both the Barnwell and the Envirocare facility in Utah are used to generate disposal costs.

High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act"1'11 (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. Two permanent disposal facilities were envisioned, as well as an interim storage facility. To recover the cost, the legislation created a Nuclear Waste Fund through which money is collected from the sale of electricity generated by the power plants. The NWPA, along with the individual disposal contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.

Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule. By January 1998, the DOE had failed to initiate the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high level waste, as required by the NWPA and the utility contracts.

As a result, utilities have initiated legal action against the DOE. While legal actions continue, the DOE has no plans to receive spent fuel prior to completing the construction of its geologic repository.

Operation of DOE's yet-to-be constructed repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC, the successful resolution of pending litigation, and the development of a national transportation system. By "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980," Public Law 96-573, 1980.

1"

'Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986.

"Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nruclear Generating Station Document Ei6-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xii of xvi comparison, the Private Fuel Storage consortium submitted an application for an interim storage facility in 1997. To date, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has issued only a partial ruling on one of several issues that need to be resolved prior to the NRC issuing a license for the facility. With a more technically complex and politically sensitive application for permanent disposal, it is not unreasonable to expect that the NRC's approval to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain would require at least as long &'revlew period. Construction would therefore begin sometime around the year 2010, at the earliest. The DOE has no plans for receiving spent fuel from commercial nuclear plant sites prior to this date and startup operations may be phased in, creating additional delays. For estimating purposes, AmerGen Energy has assumed that the high-level waste repository, or some interim storage facility, will be fully operational by 2015. This timetable is consistent with the findings of an evaluation recently issued to Congress by the Government Accounting Office.[12J The NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the caretaking of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the DOE.E13] Interim storage of the fuel, until the DOE has completed the transfer, will be in the storage pool and/or an ISFSI located on the Oyster Creek site.

The ISFSI, which is independently licensed and operated, will be expanded to support decommissioning operations. For the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, the facility is sized to accommodate the inventory of spent fuel residing in the plant's storage pool at the conclusion of the required cooling period. Once emptied, the reactor building can be either decontaminated and dismantled, or prepared for long-term storage. In the Delayed DECON scenario, the existing ISFSI and storage pool remain operational and are used for the interim storage of the fuel until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer.

The DOE's generator allocation/receipt schedules are based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority. Given this scenario and an anticipated rate of transfer, spent fuel is projected to remain at the site for approximately 19 years after the cessation of operations. Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Oyster Creek site until the year 2027.

12 "Technical, Schedule, and Cost Uncertainties of the Yucca Mountain Repository Project," GAO-02-191, December 2001.

13 "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50.54 (bb).

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xiii of xvi Site Restoration The efficient removal of the contaminated materials at the site may result in damage to many of the site structures. Blasting, coring, drilling, and the other decontamination activities will substantially damage power block structures, potentially weakening the footings and structural supports. Prompt demolition once the license is terminated is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized is more efficient and less costly than if the process were deferred. Experience at shutdown generating stations has shown that plant facilities quickly degrade 'without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public and the demolition work force.

Consequently, this analysis assumes that non-essential site structures within the restricted access area are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below the local grade level wherever possible. The site is then backfilled, graded and stabilized.

Summary The costs to decommission Oyster Creek are evaluated for several decommissioning scenarios, incorporating both the DECON and SAFSTOR decommissioning alternatives. Regardless of the timing of the decommissioning activities, the estimates assume the eventual removal of all the contaminated and activated plant components and structural materials, such that the facility operator may then have unrestricted use of the site with no further requirement for an operating license. Delayed decommissioning (Delayed DECON) is initiated after the spent fuel has been removed from the site and is accomplished within the 60-year period required by current NRC regulations. In the interim, the spent fuel remains in storage at the site until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility can be completed. Once the transfer is complete, the storage facilities are also decommissioned.

The scenarios analyzed for the purpose of generating the estimates are described in Section 2. The assumptions are presented in Section'3, along with schedules of annual expenditures. The major cost contributors are identified in Section 6, with detailed activity costs, waste volumes, and associated manpower requirements delineated in Appendices C, D, and E. Cost summaries for the various scenarios are provided at the end of this section for the major cost components.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Page xiv of xvi

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DECON (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

Activity Total I,

I Decontamination Removal Packaging Transportation Waste Disposal Off-site Waste Processing Program Management [1]

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation ISFSI Related (non-operating)

Insurance and Regulatory Fees Energy Characterization and Licensing Surveys Property Taxes Miscellaneous Equipment Site O&M 14,149 106,014 12,406 5,561 96,915 36,757 236,572 9,332 81,723 18,601 4,095 10,191 20,638 5,998 5,526 Total 12]

664,477 NRC License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration III Includes engineering and security 121 Columns may not add due to rounding 480,331 141,648 42,498 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Pagexv of xvi

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DELAYED DECON (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

Activity Total Decontamination Removal Packaging Transportation Waste Disposal Off-site Waste Processing Program Management [l]

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation ISFSI Related (non-operating)

Insurance and Regulatory Fees Energy Characterization and Licensing Surveys Property Taxes Miscellaneous Equipment Site O&M 18,113 95,991 8,829 4,258 58,593 43,866 261,672 9,332 38,655 31,133 11,808 11,524 25,513 9,183 6,798 Total (21 635,270 NRC License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration 11] Includes engineering and security 121 Columns may not add due to rounding 414,583 175,539 45,148 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Pagexvi of xvi

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS SAFSTOR (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

Activity Total I.

Decontamination Removal Packaging Transportation Waste Disposal Off-site Waste Processing Program Management [1]

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation ISFSI Related (non-operating)

Insurance and Regulatory Fees Energy Characterization and Licensing Surveys Property Taxes Miscellaneous Equipment Site O&M 18,035 99,217 8,949 4,282 56,405 43,468 343,367 9,332 77,603 69,823 8,933 11,524 67,209 16,269 17,696 Total 12]

852,113 NRC License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration I'] Includes engineering and security 2J Columns may not add due to rounding 610,009 196,982 45,122 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station r

Document E16.1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 1 of 7

1. INTRODUCTION' This report presents estimates of the cost to decommission the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) for the scenarios described in Section 2, following a scheduled cessation of plant operations. The analysis is designed to provide AmerGen Energy with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear unit. It is not a detailed engineering document, but a financial analysis prepared in advance of the detailed engineering that will be required to carry out the decommissioning.

1.1 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY The objectives of this study are to prepare comprehensive estimates of the cost to deconmmission Oyster Creek, to provide a sequence or schedule for the associated activities, and to develop waste stream projections from the decontamination and dismantling activities. For the purposes of this study, the shutdown date was taken as April 9, 2009, the,expiration date of the current operating license.

1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION The Oyster Creek nuclear unit is about two miles inland from the shore of Barnegat Bay on the coast of New Jersey. The site is approximately nine miles south of Toms River, New Jersey; about fifty miles east of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and sixty miles south of Newark, New Jersey. The generating station is comprised of a single reactor with supporting facilities.

Oyster Creek was designed and constructed by the General Electric Company Atomic Power Equipment Department as a turnkey project. The reactor is a single-cycle, forced circulation boiling water reactor producing steam for direct use in the steam turbine. The reactor vessel and the recirculation system are contained within the drywell of a pressure absorption containment system housed within the reactor building. The primary containment system consists of the drywell, vent pipes, and a pool of water contained in the absorption chamber (torus). The reactor building encloses the primary containment

system, thereby providing a

secondary containment.

Oyster Creek presently operates under a full term operating license at a maximum thermal power level of about 1930 MWth with a corresponding TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 2 of 7 gross electrical output of approximately 670 MWe. Heat produced in the reactor is converted to electrical energy by the steam and power conversion system. A turbine-generator system converts the thermal energy of steam produced by the reactor into mechanical shaft power and then into electrical energy. The turbine consists of a high-pressure, double-flow turbine element and three double-flow, low-pressure turbine elements all aligned in tandem.

The generator is a direct-driven 60 cycle, 24,000 volt, conductor-cooled, synchronous generator rated at 640,700 kW. The turbine is operated in a closed feedwater cycle which condenses the steam; the heated feedwater is returned to the reactor. Heat rejected in the main condensers is removed by the circulating water system.

The circulating water system provides the heat sink required for removal of waste heat in the power plant's thermal cycle. Water is drawn from Barnegat Bay through a 140 foot wide intake canal which follows the general course of the south branch of Forked River. The system has the principal function of removing heat by absorbing this energy in the main condenser. After passing through the plant condensers, the water is routed through the discharge canal which empties into Barnegat Bay.

1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," issued in June 1988.[1] This rule set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.

The regulation addressed decommissioning planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements. The intent of the rule was to ensure that decommissioning would be accomplished in a safe and timely manner and that adequate funds would be available for this purpose.

Subsequent to the rule, the NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"[2J which provided additional guidance to the licensees of nuclear facilities on the financial methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the requirements of the rule. The regulatory guide addressed the funding requirements and provided guidance on the content and form of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule.

The rule defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. The DECON alternative, the option evaluated for this analysis, assumes that any contaminated or activated portion of the plant's systems, structures, and facilities are removed TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 3 of 7 or decontaminated to levels that permit, the site to be released for unrestricted use shortly after the cessation of plant operations. The rule also placed limits on the time allowed to complete the decommissioning process.

For SAFSTOR, the process is restricted in overall duration to 60 years, unless it can be shown that a longer duration is necessary to protect public health and safety. The guidelines for ENTOMB are similar, providing the NRC with both sufficient leverage and flexibility to ensure that these deferred options are only, used in situations where it is reasonable and consistent with the definition of decommissioning. At the conclusion of a 60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB if the NRC approves such a case), the site would still require significant remediation to meet the unrestricted release limits for license termination.

The ENTOMB alternative has not been viewed as a viable option for power reactors due to the significant time required to isolate the long-lived radionuclides for decay to permissible levels. However, with recent rulemaking permitting the controlled release of a site, the NRC has re-evaluated this alternative.13 1 The resulting feasibility study, based upon an assessment by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, concluded that the method did have conditional merit for some, if not most, reactors. However, the staff also found that additional rulemaking would be needed before this option could be treated as a generic alternative. The NRC had considered rulemaking to alter the 60-year time for completing decommissioning and to clarify the use of engineered barriers for reactor entombments.(4] However, the staff has recently recommended that rulemaking be deferred, based upon several factors, e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the entombment option, the unresolved issues associated with the disposition of greater-than-Class C material (GTCC), and the NRC's current priorities, at least until after the additional research studies are complete. The Commission has concurred with the staffs recommendation.

The NRC published revisions to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants in 1996.[5] When the regulations were adopted in 1988, it was assumed that the majority of licensees would decommission at the end of the facility's operating licensed life. Since that time, several licensees permanently and prematurely ceased operations.

Exemptions from certain operating requirements were required once the reactor was defueled to facilitate the decommissioning. Each case was handled individually, without clearly defined generic requirements. The NRC amended the decommissioning regulations in 1996 to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process. The new amendments allow for TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455-006,-Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 4 of 7 greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.

Under the revised regulations, licensees will submit written certification to the NRC within 30 days after the decision to cease operations. Certification will also be required once the fuel is permanently removed from the reactor vessel. Submittal of these notices will entitle the licensee to a fee reduction and eliminate the obligation to follow certain requirements needed only during operation of the reactor. Within two years of submitting notice of permanent cessation of operations, the licensee is required to submit a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the NRC. The PSDAR describes the planned decommissioning activities, the associated sequence and schedule, and an estimate of expected costs. Prior to completing decommissioning, the licensee is required to submit an application to the NRC to terminate the license, which will include a License Termination Plan (LTP).

1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act[61 (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the U.S.

Department of Energy (DOE). Two permanent disposal facilities and an interim storage facility were envisioned. To recover the cost, the legislation created a Nuclear Waste Fund through which money is collected from the sale of electricity generated by the power plants. The NWPA, along with the individual disposal contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.

After pursuing a national site selection process, the NWPA was amended in 1987 to designate Yucca Mountain, Nevada, as the only site to be evaluated for geologic disposal of high-level waste. Also in 1987, the DOE announced a five-year delay (1998 to 2003) in the opening date for the repository. Two years later, in 1989, an additional seven-year delay was announced, primarily due to problems in obtaining the permits necessary from the State of Nevada to perform the required characterization of the site.

Generators have responded to this impasse by initiating legal action and constructing supplemental storage as a means of maintaining necessary operating margins. In an August 2000 ruling,[7J the U.S.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 5 of 7 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit keaffirmed the utility position that DOE had breached its contractual obligation. Legal actions with the DOE continue; however, the DOE's position has remained unchanged. The agency continues to maintain that its delayed performance is unavoidable because it does not have an operational repository and does not have authority to provide storage in the interim, Consequently the DOE has no plans to receive spent fuel from the commercial reactors until the repository is operational.

The NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),

§50.54 (bb).18] This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements in the decommissioning estimates, as identified in Section 3.

An independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) is currently operational at the site to provide supplenment fuel storage. In two of the scenarios evaluated, the ISFSI is expanded to accommodate the inventory of spent fuel residing in the plant's storage pool at the conclusion of the required cooling period. Once emptied, the reactor building can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. In the Delayed DECON scenario, the storage pool remains operational and is used for the interim storage of the fuel. The ISFSI remains operational; however, it is not used to offload the pool.

Both facilities are maintained until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer.

For estimating purposes, the DOE is assumed to initiate spent fuel receipt in the year 2015. The DOE's generator allocation/receipt schedules are based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.

Given this scenario and an anticipated rate of transfer, spent fuel is projected to remain at the site for almost 19 years after the cessation of operations. Consequently, costs are included within the analysis for the continued operation of the storage pool and the expansion of the ISFSI, as required, and for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the site until the year 2027.

[This evaluation is prepared without prejudice to the rights of AmerGen Energy to pursue legal and contractual remedies from the DOE in light of recent court decisions.]

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 6 of 7 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposal. Congress passed the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980,19 declaring the states as being ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders. The federal law encouraged the formation of regional groups or compacts to implement this objective safely, efficiently, and economically, and set a target date of 1986 for implementation. After little progress, the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985,"[11] extended the implementation schedule, with specific milestones and stiff sanctions for non-compliance.

However, to date, no new compact facilities have been successfully sited, licensed, and constructed.

New Jersey is a member of the three-state Atlantic Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact, formed after New Jersey formally joined the Northeast Regional Compact. The Barnwell Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility, located in South Carolina, is expected to be available to support the decommissioning of Oyster Creek. It is also assumed that AmerGen Energy can access other disposal sites should it prove cost-effective. As such, rate schedules for both the Barnwell and the Envirocare facility in Utah are used to generate disposal costs.

1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination In 1997, the NRC published Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination,"1 1 1] amending 10 CFR §20. This subpart provides radiological criteria for releasing a facility for unrestricted use. The regulation states that the site can be released for unrestricted use if radioactivity levels are such that the average member of a critical group would not receive a Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in excess of 25 millirem per year, and provided that residual radioactivity has been reduced to levels that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). The decommissioning estimates for Oyster Creek assume that the site will be remediated to a residual level consistent with the NRC-prescribed level.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 7 of 7 It should be noted that the NRC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) differ on the amount of residual radioactivity considered acceptable in site remediation. The EPA has two limits that apply to radioactive materials. An EPA limit of 15 millirem per year is derived from criteria established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). 1 21 An additional limit of 4 millirem per year, as defined in 40 CFR

§141.16, is applied to drinking water.j13]

On October 9, 2002, the NRC signed an agreement with the EPA on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

[14]

provides that EPA will defer exercise of authority under CERCLA for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority. The MOU also includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOU.

The MOU does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and should reduce the involvement of the EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning. Most sites are expected to meet the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and the NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOU that trigger consultation with the EPA. However, if there are other hazardous materials on the site, the EPA may be involved in the cleanup. As such, the possibility of dual regulation remains for certain licensees. The present study does not include any costs for this occurrence.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 1 of 14

2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost estimates were developed to decommission Oyster Creek utilizing.a combination of the approved decommissioning alternatives: DECON and SAFSITOR.

Although the alternatives differ with respect to technique, process, cost, and schedule, they attain the same result: the ultimate release of the site for unrestricted use.

Three decommissioning scenarios were evaluated for the nuclear unit. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows:

1.

DECON: The operating license expires in April 2009. The first scenario assumes that the total duration of the physical dismantling process is minimized. The existing ISFSI is expanded to accommodate any residual spent fuel remaining from plant operations so as to facilitate the decontamination and dismantling of the power block structures. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2027.

2.

Delayed DECON: In the second scenario, the unit is prepared for an abbreviated period of storage. The spent fuel discharged to the storage pool, once operations cease, remains in the pool until it can be transferred to a DOE facility, i.e., an ISFSI is not used to offload the pool. Decommissioning is delayed until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, i.e., in the year 2027. The unit is then decommissioned.

3.

SAFSTOR: The unit is placed into safe-storage in the third scenario. However, decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the maximum required 60-year period. Spent fuel remaining in the spent fuel storage pool after a minimum cooling period of 5% years is transferred to the ISFSI for interim storage.

The following sections describe the basic activities associated with each alternative.

Although detailed procedures for each activity identified are not provided, and the actual sequence of work may vary, the activity descriptions provide a basis not only for estimating but also for the expected scope of work, i.e., engineering and planning at the time of decommissioning.

The conceptual approach that the NRC has described in its regulations divides decommissioning into three phases. The initial phase commences with the effective date of permanent cessation of operations and involves the transition of both plant TLG Services, Inc.

Oldster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16 1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 2 of 14 and licensee from reactor operations (i.e., power production) to facility de-activation and closure. During the first phase, notification is to be provided to the NRC certifying the permanent cessation of operations and the removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. The licensee would then be prohibited from reactor operation.

The second phase encompasses activities during the storage period or during major decommissioningactivities, or a combination of the two. The third phase pertains to the activities involved in license termination. The decommissioning estimates developed for Oyster Creek are also divided into phases or periods; however, demarcation of the phases is based upon major milestones within the project or significant changes in the projected expenditures.

2.1 DECON The DECON alternative, as defined by the NRC, is "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." This study does not address the cost to dispose of the, spent fuel residing at the site; such costs are funded through a surcharge on electrical generation. However, the study does estimate the costs incurred with the interim on-site storage of the fuel pending shipment by the DOE to an off-site disposal facility.

2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations In anticipation of the cessation of plant operations, detailed preparations are undertaken to provide a smooth transition from plant operations to site decommissioning. Through implementation of a staffing transition plan, the organization required to manage the intended decommissioning activities is assembled from available plant staff and outside resources.

Preparations include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications applicable to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.

Engineering and Planning The PSDAR, required within two years of the notice to cease operations, provides a description of the licensee's planned decommissioning activities, a timetable, and the associated financial requirements of the intended decommissioning program. Upon receipt of the PSDAR, the TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 3 of 14 NRC will make the document available to the public for comment in a local hearing to be held in the vicinity of the reactor site. Ninety days following submittal and NRC receipt of the PSDAR, the licensee may begin to perform major decommissioning activities under a modified 10 CFR §50.59 procedure, i.e., without specific NRC approval. Major activities are defined as any activity that results in permanent removal of major radioactive components, permanently modifies the structure of the containment, or results in dismantling components (for shipment) containing GTCC, as defined by 10 CFR §61. Major components are further defined as comprising the reactor vessel and internals, large bore reactor recirculation system piping, and other large components that are radioactive. The NRC includes the following additional criteria for use of the §50.59 process in decommissioning.

The proposed activity must not:

• foreclose release of the site for possible unrestricted use,

• significantly increase decommissioning costs,

• cause any significant environmental impact, or

• violate the terms of the licensee's existing license.

Existing operational technical specifications are reviewed and modified to reflect plant conditions and the safety concerns associated with permanent cessation of operations.

The environmental impact associated with the planned decommissioning activities is also considered. Typically, a licensee will not be allowed to proceed if the consequences of a particular decommissioning activity are greater than that bounded by previously evaluated environmental assessments or impact statements. In this instance, the licensee would have to submit a license amendment for the specific activity and update the environmental report.

The decommissioning program outlined in the PSDAR will be designed to accomplish the required tasks within the ALARA guidelines (as defined in 10 CFR §20) for protection of personnel from exposure to radiation hazards. It will also address the continued protection of the health and safety of the public and the environment during the dismantling activity. Consequently, with the development of the PSDAR, activity specifications, cost-benefit and safety analyses, work packages and procedures, would be assembled to support the proposed decontamination and dismantling activities.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 4 of 14 Site Preparations Following final plant shutdown, and in preparation for actual decommissioning activities, the following activities are initiated:

• Characterization of the site and surrounding environs. This includes radiation surveys of work areas, major components (including the reactor vessel and its internals), internal piping, and primary shield cores.

• Expansion of the existing ISFSI for the interim storage of spent fuel in wet storage.

• Isolation of the spent fuel storage pool and fuel handling systems, such that decommissioning operations can commence on the balance

'of the plant. The pool will remain operational for approximately 5Y2 years following the cessation of operations before the inventory resident at shutdown can be transferred to either the ISFSI or a DOE facility.

Specification of transport and disposal requirements for activated materials and/or hazardous materials, including shielding and waste stabilization.

Development of procedures for occupational exposure control, control and release of liquid and gaseous effluent, processing of radwaste (including dry-active waste, resins, filter media, metallic and non-metallic components generated in decommissioning), site security and emergency programs, and industrial safety.

2.1.2 Period 2-Decommissioning Operations This period includes the physical decommissioning activities associated with the removal and disposal of contaminated and activated components and structures, including the successful termination of the 10 CFR §50 operating license. Significant decommissioning activities in this phase include:

Construction of temporary facilities and/or modification of existing facilities to support dismantling activities. This may include a centralized processing area to facilitate equipment removal and component preparations for off-site disposal.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 5 of 14 Reconfiguration and modification of site structures and facilities as needed to support decommissioning operations. This may include the upgrading of roads (on-and off-site) to facilitate hauling and transport. Modifications may be required to the containment structure to facilitate access of large/heavy equipmnent.

Modifications may also be required to the refueling area of the building to support the segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and component extraction.

Design and fabrication of temporary and permanent shielding to support removal and transportation activities, construction of contamination control envelopes, and the procurement of specialty tooling.

• Procurement Oease or purchase) of shipping canisters, cask liners, and industrial packages.

• Decontamination of components and piping systems as required to control (minimize) worker exposure.

• Removal of piping and components no longer essential to support-decommissioning operations.

• Transfer of the steam separator and dryer assemblies to the dryer-separator pool for segmentation. Segmentation by weight and activity maximizes the loading of the shielded transport casks. The operations are conducted under water using remotely operated tooling and contamination controls.

• Disconnection of the control blades from the drives on the vessel lower head. Blades are transferred to the spent fuel pool for packaging.

• Disassembly, segmentation, and packaging of the core shroud and in-core guide tubes. Some of the material is expected to exceed Class C disposal requirements. As such, those segments are packaged in a modified fuel storage canister for geologic disposal.

Removal and segmentation of the remaining internals including the fuel support castings and core plate assembly.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 6 of 14

• Draining and decontamination of 'the reactor well and the permanent sealing of the spent fuel transfer gate. Install shielded platform for segmentation of reactor vessel. Cutting operations are performed in air using remotely operated equipment within a contamination control envelope, with the water level maintained just below the cut to minimize the working area dose rates. Sections are transferred to the dryer-separator pool for packaging and interim storage.

• Disconnection of the control rod drives and instrumentation tubes from reactor vessel lower head. The lower reactor head and vessel supporting structure are then segmented.

• Removal of the reactor recirculation pumps. Exterior surfaces are decontaminated and openings covered.

Components can serve as

'their own burial containers provided that all penetrations are properly sealed.

• Demolition of the sacrificial shield activated concrete by controlled demolition.

• Transfer of the spent fuel from the storage pool to the DOE and ISFSI pad for interim storage.

At least two years prior to the anticipated date of license termination, a LTP is required. Submitted as a supplement to the FSAR or its equivalent, the plan must include: a site characterization, description of the remaining dismantling activities, plans for site remediation, procedures for the final radiation survey, designation of the end use of the site, an updated cost estimate to complete the decommissioning, and any associated environmental concerns. The NRC will notice the receipt of the plan, make the plan available for public comment, and schedule a local hearing. LTP approval will be subject to any conditions and limitations as deemed appropriate by the Commission. The licensee may then commence with the final remediation of site facilities and services, including:

Removal of remaining plant systems and associated components as they become nonessential to the decommissioning program or worker health and safety (e.g., waste collection and treatment systems, electrical power and ventilation systems).

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 7 of 14

• Removal of the steel liners from the drywell, disposing of the activated and contaminated sections as radioactive waste. Removal of any activated/ contaminated concrete.

Removal of the steel liners from the steam separator and dryer pool, reactor well, and spent fuel storage pools.

Surveys of the decontaminated areas of the containment structure.

Removal of the contaminated equipment and material from the turbine and radwaste buildings, and any other contaminated facility. Use radiation and contamination control techniques until radiation surveys indicate that the structures can be released for unrestricted access and conventional demolition. This activity may necessitate the dismantling and disposition of most of the systems and components (both clean and contaminated) located within these buildings. This activity will facilitate surface decontamination and subsequent verification surveys required prior to obtaining release for demolition.

Routing of material removed in the decontamination and dismantling to.a central processing area. Material certified to be free of contamination is released for unrestricted disposition, e.g.,

as scrap, recycle, or general disposal. Contaminated material is characterized and segregated for additional off-site processing (disassembly, chemical cleaning, volume reduction, and waste treatment), and/or packaged for controlled disposal at a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.

Incorporated into the LTP is the Final Survey Plan. This plan identifies the radiological surveys to be performed once the decontamination activities are completed and is developed using the guidance provided in the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)."C151 This document incorporates the statistical approaches to survey design and data interpretation used by the EPA. It also identifies state-of-the-art, commercially available instrumentation and procedures for conducting radiological surveys. Use of this guidance ensures that the surveys are conducted in a manner that provides a high degree of confidence that applicable NRC criteria are satisfied. Once the survey is complete, the results are provided to the NRC in a format that can be verified. The NRC then reviews and evaluates the information, TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 8 of 14 performs an independent confirmation of radiological site conditions, and makes a determination on final termination of the license.

The NRC will terminate the operating license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the LTP, and that theterminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release.

2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site restoration activities will begin. Efficient removal of the contaminated materials and verification that residual radionuclide concentrations are below the NRC limits will result in substantial damage to many of the structures.

Although performed in a controlled, safe manner, blasting, coring, drilling, scarification (surface removal), and the other decontamination activities will substantially degrade power block structures including the reactor and radwaste buildings. Under certain circumstances, verifying that, subsurface radionuclide concentrations meet NRC site release requirements will require removal of grade slabs and lower floors, potentially weakening footings and structural supports. This removal activity will be necessary for those facilities and plant areas where historical records, when available, indicate the potential for radionuclides having been present in the soil, where system failures have been recorded, or where it is required to confirm that subsurface process and drain lines were not breached over the operating life of the station.

Prompt dismantling of site structures is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process were deferred. Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public as well as to future workers. Abandonment creates a breeding ground for vermin infestation as well as other biological hazards.

This cost study presumes that non-essential structures and site facilities are dismantled as a continuation of the decommissioning activity.

Foundations and exterior walls are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. The three-foot depth allows for the TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 9 of 14 placement of gravel for drainage, as well' as topsoil, so that vegetation can be established for erosion control. Site areas affected by the dismantling activities are restored and the plant area graded as required to prevent ponding and inhibit the refloating of subsurface materials.

Concrete rubble produced by demolition activities is processed to remove rebar and miscellaneous embedments. The processed material is then used on site to backfill voids. Excess materials are trucked to an off-site area for disposal as construction debris.

2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissionin' The ISFSI will continue to operate under a separate and independent license (10 CFR §72) following the termination of the §50 operating license. Assuming the DOE starts accepting fuel in 2015, transfer of spent fuel from Oyster Creek is anticipated to begin in 2025 and continue through the year 2027.

At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process, the ISFSI will be decommissioned. The Commission will terminate the §72 license if it determines that the remediation of the ISFSI has been performed in accordance with an ISFSI license termination plan and that the final radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. Once the requirements are satisfied, the NRC can terminate the license for the ISFSI.

The assumed design for the ISFSI is based upon the use of a multi-purpose canister and a concrete overpack for pad storage. For purposes of this cost analysis, it is assumed that once the inner canisters containing the spent fuel assemblies have been

removed, any required decontamination performed, and the license for the facility terminated, the modules can be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete. The concrete storage pad will then be removed, and the area graded and landscaped to conform to the surrounding environment.

2.2 SAFSTOR AND DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING The NRC defines SAFSTOR as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."

The facility is left intact TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 10 of 14 (during the dormancy period), with structures maintained in a sound condition.

Systems not required to operate in support of the spent fuel pool or site surveillance and security are drained, de-energized, and secured. Minimal cleaning/removal of loose contamination and/or fixation and sealing of remaining contamination is performed. Access to contaminated areas is secured to provide controlled access for inspection and maintenance.

The engineering and planning requirements are similar to those for the DECON alternative, although a shorter time period is expected for these activities due to the more limited work scope. Site preparations are also similar to those for the DECON alternative.

However, with the exception of the required radiation surveys and site characterizations, the mobilization and preparation of site facilities is less extensive.

The following discussion is appropriate for both the SAFSTOR and Delayed DECON scenarios, the primary differences being in the storage meth6ds for the spent fuel and the length of the dormancy period. Spent fuel is continued to be stored in the wet storage pool for the Delayed DECON scenario until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility can be completed, i.e., the ISFSI is not used to offload the pool. Decommissioning operations are assumed to begin once the transfer is complete. By contrast, all of the fuel remaining in the storage pool after the minimum required cooling period is relocated to the ISFSI in the SAFSTOR scenario and the pool emptied. The nuclear unit remains in storage after fuel transfer operations are completed, with decommissioning operations initiated such that the license is terminated within the required 60-year time period.

2.2.1 Period 1 -Preparations Preparations for long-term storage include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications appropriate to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.

The process of placing the plant in safe-storage includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:

• Isolation of the spent fuel storage services and fuel handling systems so that safe-storage operations may commence on the balance of the plant. This activity may be carried out by plant personnel in accordance with existing operating technical specifications. Activities TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 11 of 14 are scheduled around the fuel handling' systems to the greatest extent possible.

• Draining and de-energizing of the non-contaminated systems not required to support continued site operations or maintenance.

eDisposing of contaminated filter elements and resin beds not required for processing wastes from layup activities for future operations.

• Draining of the reactor vessel, with the internals left in place and the vessel head secured.

• Draining and de-energizing non-essential, contaminated systems with decontamination as required for future maintenance and inspection.

. 'Preparing lighting and alarm systems whose continued use is required; de-energizing portions of fire protection, electric power, and HVAC systems whose continued use is not required.

Cleaning of the loose surface contamination from building access pathways.

Performing an interim radiation survey of plant, posting warning signs where appropriate.

• Erecting physical barriers and/or securing all access to radioactive or contaminated

areas, except as required for inspection and maintenance.

Installing security and surveillance monitoring equipment and relocating security fence around secured structures, as required.

2.2.2 Period 2 - Dormancy The second phase identified by the NRC in its rule addresses licensed activities during a storage period and is applicable to the dormancy phases of the deferred decommissioning alternatives.

Dormancy activities include a 24-hour security force, preventive and corrective maintenance on security systems, area lighting, general building maintenance, heating and ventilation of buildings, routine* radiological TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 12 of 14 inspections of contaminated structures, maintenance of structural integrity, and a site environmental and radiation monitoring program.

Resident maintenance personnel perform equipment maintenance, inspection activities, routine services to maintain safe conditions, adequate lighting, heating, and ventilation, and periodic preventive maintenance on essential site services.

An environmental surveillance program is carried out during the dormancy period to ensure that releases of radioactive material to the environment are prevented and/or detected and controlled. Appropriate emergency procedures are established and initiated for potential releases that exceed prescribed limits. The environmental surveillance program constitutes an abbreviated version of the program in effect during normal plant operations.

Security during the dormancy period is conducted primarily to prevent unauthorized entry and to protect the public from the consequences of its own actions. The security fence, sensors, alarms, and other surveillance equipment provide security. Fire and radiation alarms are also monitored and maintained. While remote surveillance is an option, it does not offer the immediate response time of a physical presence.

The transfer of the spent fuel to a DOE facility continues during this period until complete. Fuel is shipped exclusively from the ISFSI in the SAFSTOR scenario and from the pool and the ISFSI in the Delayed DECON scenario.

After an optional period of storage (such that license termination is accomplished within 60 years of final shutdown), it is required that the licensee submit an application to terminate the license, along with an LTP (described in Section 2.1.2), thereby initiating the third phase.

2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning Prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations, preparations are undertaken to reactivate site services and prepare for decommissioning. Preparations include engineering and planning, a detailed site characterization, and the assembly of a decommissioning management organization. Final planning for activities and the writing of activity specifications and detailed procedures are also initiated at this time.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning CostAnalysis Section 2, Page 13 of 14 Much of the work in developing a termination plan is relevant to the development of the detailed engineering plans and procedures; The activities associated with this phase and the follow-on decontamination and dismantling processes are detailed in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. The primary difference between the sequences anticipated for the DECON and deferred scenarios is the absence, in the latter, of any constraint on the availability of the fuel storage facilities for decommissioning.

Variations in the length of the dormancy period are expected to have little effect upon the quantities of radioactive wastes generated from system and structure removal operations.

Given the levels of radioactivity and spectrum of radionuclides expected from thirty to forty years of plant operation, no plant process system identified as being contaminated upon final shutdown will become releasable due to the decay period alone, i.e., there is no significant reduction in the waste generated from the decommissioning activities. However, due to the lower activity levels, a greater percentage of the waste volume can be designated for off-site processing and recovery.

The delay in decommissioning also yields lower working area radiation levels. As such, the estimates for the delayed scenarios incorporate reduced ALARA controls for the SAFSTOR's lower occupational exposure potential.

Although the initial radiation levels due to 60Co will decrease during the dormancy period, the internal components of the reactor vessel will still exhibit sufficiently high radiation dose rates to require remote sectioning under water due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides such as 94Nb, 59Ni, and 63Ni. Therefore, the dismantling procedures described for the DECON alternative would still be employed during deferred scenarios.

Portions of the biological shield will still be radioactive due to the presence of activated trace elements with long half-lives (152Eu and 154Eu). Decontamination will require controlled removal and disposal. It is assumed that radioactive corrosion products on inner surfaces of piping and components will not have decayed to levels that will permit unrestricted use or allow conventional removal. These systems and components will be surveyed as they are removed and disposed of in accordance with the existing radioactive release criteria.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,'Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 14 of 14 2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site-restoration activities can begin. If the site structures are to be dismantled, dismantling as a continuation of the decommissioning process is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option, as described in Section 2.1.3. The basis for the dismantling cost in the deferred scenarios is consistent with that described for DECON, presuming the removal of structures and site facilities to a nominal depth of three feet below grade and the limited restoration of the site.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 1 of2l

3. COST ESTIMATE The cost estimates prepared for decommissioning Oyster Creek consider the unique features of the site, including the NSSS, p6wer generation systems, support services, site buildings, and ancillary facilities. The basis of the estimates, including the sources of information relied upon, the estimating methodology employed, site-specific considerations, and other pertinent assumptions, is described in this section.

3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATE The estimates were developed with site-specific, technical information originally developed in an evaluation prepared for the GPU Nuclear Corporation in 1997-99.116] The information was reviewed for the current analysis and updated as deemed aippropriate. The site-specific considerations and assumptions used in the previous evaluation were also revisited. Modifications were incorporated where new information was available or experience from ongoing decommissioning programs provided viable alternatives or improved processes.

3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used to develop the estimates follows the basic approach originally presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study report, "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"[17] and the DOE "Decommissioning Handbook."[18] These documents present a unit factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs, which simplifies the estimating calculations. Unit factors for concrete removal

($/cubic yard), steel removal ($/ton), and cutting costs ($/inch) were developed using local labor rates. The activity-dependent costs were estimated with the item quantities (cubic yards and tons), developed from plant drawings and inventory documents. Removal rates and material costs for the conventional disposition of components and structures relied upon information available in the industry publication, "Building Construction Cost Data," published by R.S.

Means.[19]

This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Oyster Creek, Connecticut Yankee, and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Pqge 2 of2l regulatory aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.

The unit factor method provides a demonstrable basis for establishing reliable cost estimates. The detail provided in the unit factors, including adtivity duration, labor costs (by craft), and equipment and consumable costs, ensures that essential elements have not been omitted. Appendix A presents the detailed development of a typical unit factor. Appendix B provides the values contained within one set of factors developed for this analysis.

Work Difficulty Factors WDFs were assigned to each area, commensurate with the inefficiencies associated with working in confined, hazardous environments. The ranges used for the WDFs are as follows:

• Access Factor 0% to 40%

• Respiratory Protection Factor 0% to 50%

Radiation/ALARA Factor 0% to 100%

Protective Clothing Factor 0% to 30%

Work Break Factor 8.33%

These factors and their associated range of values were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's Guideline Study. The factors (and their suggested application) are discussed in more detail in Appendix F.

Scheduling Proe-ram Durations The unit factors, adjusted by the WDFs as described above, are applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in the radiologically controlled areas.

The resulting man-hours, or crew-hours, are used in the development of the decommissioning program schedule, using resource loading and event sequencing considerations. The scheduling of conventional removal and dismantling activities are based upon productivity information available from the "Building Construction Cost Data" publication.

An area-by-area activity duration critical path was used to develop the total decommissioning program schedule. The unit cost factors, adjusted for WDF's as described above, were applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in each defined work area. Each work area was assessed for the most efficient number of workers/crews for the decommissioning activities. These adjusted unit cost factors were applied against the available manpower so that TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 3 of2l an overall duration for removal of components and piping from each work area could be calculated.

Work area identification is consistent with the Survey Tracking Number (STN) system utilized by GPU's radiological services group in the 1997 timeframe. An index of the GPU STN's is provided in Appendix G.

The program schedule is used to determine the period-dependent costs for program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, contracted services, etc. The study relies upon regional or site-specific salary and wage rates for the personnel associated with the intended program.

3.3 FINANCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLG's proprietary decommissioning cost model, DECCER, produces a number of distinct cost elements. These direct expenditures, however, do not comprise the total cost to accomplish the project goal, i.e., license termination and site restoration.

Inherent in any cost estimate that does not rely on historical data is the inability to specify the precise source of costs imposed by factors such as tool breakage, 'accidents, illnesses, weather delays, and labor stoppages. In the DECCER cost model, contingency fulfills this role. Contingency is added to each line item to account for costs that are difficult or impossible to develop analytically. Such costs are historically inevitable over the duration of a job of this magnitude; therefore, this cost analysis includes funds to cover these types of expenses.

3.3.1 Contingencv The activity-and period-dependent costs are combined to develop the total decommissioning cost. A contingency is then applied on a line-item basis, using one or more of the contingency types listed in the AIF/NESP-036 study. "Contingencies" are defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers "Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook"[ 20] as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope; particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." The cost elements in this analysis are based upon ideal conditions and maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent with industry practice, a contingency factor has been applied. In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the types of unforeseeable events that are likely to occur in decommissioning are discussed and guidelines are provided for percentage contingency in each category. It should be noted that contingency, as used in this TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455O006,-Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 4 of2l analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.

The use and role of contingency within decommissioning estimates is not a "safety factor issue." Safety factors provide additional sedurity and address situations that may never occur. Contingency funds are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. They also provide assurance that sufficient funding is available to accomplish the intended tasks. An estimate without contingency, or from which contingency has been removed, can disrupt the orderly progression of events and jeopardize a successful conclusion to the decommissioning process.

For

example, the most technologically challenging task in decommissioning a commercial nuclear station is the disposition of the reactor vessel and internal components, now highly radioactive after a lifetime of exposure to core activity. The disposition of these components forms the' basis of the critical path (schedule) for decommissioning operations. Cost and schedule are interdependent, and any deviation in schedule has a significant impact on cost for.

performing a specific activity.

Disposition of the reactor vessel internals involves the underwater cutting of complex components that are highly radioactive. Costs are based upon optimum segmentation,

handling, and packaging scenarios. The schedule is primarily dependent upon the turnaround time for the heavily shielded shipping casks, including preparation, loading, and decontamination of the containers for transport. The number of casks required is a function of the pieces generated in the segmentation activity, a value calculated on optimum performance of the tooling employed in cutting the various subassemblies. The expected optimization, however, may not be achieved, resulting in delays and additional program costs. For this reason, contingency must be included to mitigate the consequences of the expected inefficiencies inherent in this complex activity, along with related concerns associated with the operation of highly specialized tooling, field conditions, and water clarity.

Contingency funds are an integral part of the total cost to complete the decommissioning process. Exclusion of this component puts at risk a successful completion of the intended tasks and, potentially, subsequent related activities. For this study, TLG examined the major activity-related problems (decontamination, segmentation, equipment TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 5 of2l handling, packaging, transport, and waste disposal) that necessitate a contingency. Individual activity contingencies ranged from 10% to 75%,

depending on the degree of difficulty judged to be appropriate from TLG's actual decommissioning experience.

The contingency values used in this study are as follows:

Decontamination 50%

Contaminated Component Removal 25%

Contaminated Component Packaging 10%

Contaminated Component Transport 15%

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 25%

Reactor Segmentation 75%

NSSS Component Removal 25%

Reactor Waste Packaging 25%

Reactor Waste Transport 25%

Reactor Vessel Component Disposal 50%

GTCC Disposal 15%

Non-Radioactive Component Removal

.15%

Heavy Equipment and Tooling 15%

Supplies 25%

Engineering 15%

Energy 15%

Characterization and Termination Surveys 30%

Construction 15%

Taxes and Fees 10%

Insurance 10%

Staffing 15%

The contingency values are applied to the appropriate components of the estimates on a line item basis. A composite value is then reported at the end of each estimate. For example, the composite contingency value reported for the DECON alternative is 18.9%. Values for the other alternatives are delineated within the detailed cost tables in Appendix D and E.

3.3.2 Financial Risk In addition to the routine uncertainties addressed by contingency, another cost element that is sometimes necessary to consider when bounding decommissioning costs relates to uncertainty, or risk.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 6 of2l Examples can include changes in work scope, pricing, job performance, and other variations that could conceivably, but not necessarily, occur.

Consideration is sometimes necessary to generate a level of confidence in the estimate, within a range of probabilities. TLG considers these types of costs under the broad term "financial risk." Included within the category of financial risk are:

• Transition activities and costs: ancillary expenses associated with eliminating 50% to 80% of the site labor force shortly after the cessation of plant operations, added cost for worker separation packages throughout the decommissioning program, national or company-mandated retraining, and retention incentives for key personnel.

Delays in approval of the decommissioning plan, due to intervention, public participation in local community meetings, legal challenges, and national and local hearings.

Changes in the project work scope from the baseline estimate, involving the discovery of unexpected levels of contaminants, contamination in places not previously expected, contaminated soil previously undiscovered (either radioactive or hazardous material contamination), variations in plant inventory or configuration not indicated by the as-built drawings.

Regulatory changes, e.g., affecting worker health and safety, site release criteria, waste transportation, and disposal.

Policy decisions altering national commitments, e.g., in the ability to accommodate certain waste forms for disposition, or in the timetable for such, e.g., the start and rate of acceptance of spent fuel by the DOE.

• Pricing changes for basic inputs, such as labor, energy, materials, and burial. Some of these inputs may vary slightly, e.g. -10% to

+20%; burial could vary from -50% to +200% or more.

It has been TLG's experience that the results of a risk analysis, when compared with the base case estimate for decommissioning, indicate that the chances of the base decommissioning estimate's being too high is a low probability, and the chances that the estimate is too low is a higher probability. This is mostly due to the pricing uncertainty for TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 7 of2l low-level radioactive waste burial, and to a lesser extent due' to schedule increases from changes in plant conditions and to pricing variations in the cost of labor (both craft and staff). This cost study, however, does not add any additional costs to the estimate for financial risk since there is insufficient historical data from which to pkoject future liabilities. Consequently, the areas of uncertainty or risk are revisited periodically and addressed through repeated revisions or updates of the base estimate.

3.4 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are a number of site-specific considerations that affect the method for dismantling and removal of equipment from the site and the degree of restoration required. The cost impact of the considerations identified below is included in this cost study.

3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management The cost to dispose of spent fuel generated from plant operations is not reflected within the estimates to decommission the Oyster Creek site.

Ultimate disposition of the spent fuel is within the province of the DOE's Waste Management System, as defined by the NWPA. As such, the disposal cost is financed by a 1 milllkWhr surcharge paid into the DOE's waste fund during operations. However, the NRC requires licensees to establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactors until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy. This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements within the estimates, as described below.

The total inventory of assemblies that will require handling during decommissioning is based upon several assumptions. The pickup of commercial fuel is assumed to begin in the year 2015 and will proceed on an oldest fuel first basis. The maximum rate at which the fuel is removed from the commercial sites is based upon an annual capacity at the geologic repository of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU). Any delay in the startup of the repository or decrease in the rate of acceptance will correspondingly prolong the transfer process and result in the fuel remaining at the site longer.

In all three scenarios, the ISFSI will continue to operate until such time that the transfer of spent fuel to the DOE can be completed. Assuming that the DOE commences repository operation in 2015, fuel is projected TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 8 of2l to be removed from the Oyster Creek site by the year 2027. In the Delayed Decommissioning scenario, the ISFSI is only used to store fuel placed during plant operations. To reduce caretaking costs, the smaller inventory of fuel assemblies located in the ISFSI is preferentially off-loaded as the allocations permit Operation and maintenance costs for the storage facilities (the ISFSI and the pool for the Delayed DECON scenario) are included within the estimates and address the cost for staffing the facilities, as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. The estimates include the costs to purchase, load, and transfer the fuel storage canisters. Costs are also provided for the final disposition of the facilities once the transfer is complete.

Repository Startup Operation of the DOE's yet-to-be constructed geologic repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facility's license application by the NRC, the successful resolution of pending litigation, and the development of a national transportation system. By comparison, the NRC's review of the application for an interim storage facility submitted by the Private Fuel Storage consortium began in 1997 and is still ongoing. With a more technically complex and politically sensitive application for permanent disposal, it is not unreasonable to expect that NRC approval to construct the repository at Yucca Mountain will require at least as long a review period. Construction would therefore begin sometime around the year 2010, at the earliest. Therefore, the spent fuel management plan described in this section is predicated upon the DOE initiating the pickup of commercial fuel in the year 2015. This timetable is consistent with the findings of an evaluation recently issued to Congress by the Government Accounting Office.[21 1 Spent Fuel Management Model AmerGen Energy LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Exelon Generation, LLC; the Exelon nuclear fleet, including the AmerGen units, consists of 21 units at 11 sites in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, including the inactive units at Dresden, Peach Bottom, and Zion. The ability to complete the decommissioning of these units, particularly for the DECON and Delayed DECON alternatives, is highly dependent upon when the DOE is assumed to remove spent fuel from the sites.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Pqge 9 of2l The DOE's repository program assumes that spent fuel will be accepted for disposal from the nation's commercial nuclear plants in the order (the "queue") in which it was removed from service C'oldest fuel first").[221 A computer model developed by Exelon Nuclear was used to determine when the DOE would provide allocations in the queue for removal of spent fuel from the individual sites. Repository operations were based upon annual industry-wide acceptance rates of 400 MTU/year for year 1, 600 MTU/ year for year 2, 1200 MTU/year for year 3, 2000 MTU/year for year 4, and 3000 MTU/year for year 5 and beyond. [23]

ISFSIs are constructed as necessary to maintain full-core discharge capability at the individual sites. Once the DOE begins repository operations, queue allocations are used to ship spent fuel from Exelon's operating sites in the following order: Limerick, Quad Cities, Byron, Braidwood, LaSalle and Clinton. Spent fuel shipments are then made from decommissioning sites in the order of retirement.

Canister Design A multi-purpose storage canister (similar to the HOLTEC HI-STORM system), with a 68-fuel assemblies capacity, is assumed for future cask acquisitions. A unit cost of $420,000 is used for pricing the internal multi-purpose canister (MPC), with an additional cost of $330,000 for the concrete overpack. The DOE is assumed to provide the MPC for fuel transferred directly from the pool to the DOE at no cost to the owner.

Canister Loading and Transfer An average cost of $200,000 is used for the labor to load/transport the spent fuel from the pool to the ISFSI pad, based upon industry experience. For estimating purposes, 50% of this cost is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the ISFSI to the DOE.

Operations and Maintenance Annual costs (excluding labor) of approximately $969,000 and $71,000 are used for operation and maintenance of the spent fuel pools and the ISFSI, respectively.

ISFSI Design Considerations A multi-purpose (storage and transport) dry shielded storage canister with a vertical, reinforced concrete storage overpack is used as a basis TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 10 of 21 for the cost analyses. Approximately 50% of the overpacks are assumed to have some level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of the fuel, i.e., to levels exceeding free-release limits.

Approximately 10% of the concrete and steel is assumed to be removed from the overpacks for controlled disposal. The cost to dispose of this material, as well as the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the estimiiates.

3.4.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components The NSSS (reactor vessel and reactor recirculation system components) will be decontaminated using chemical agents prior to the start of cutting operations (for DECON alternative only). A decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is assumed for the process.

The reactor pressure vessel and internal components are segmented for disposal in shielded, reusable transportation casks. Segmentation is performed in the dryer-separator pool, Where a turntable and remote cutter are installed. The vessel is segmented in place, using a mast-mounted cutter supported off the lower head and directed from a shielded work platform installed overhead in the reactor cavity.

Transportation cask specifications and transportation regulations will dictate segmentation and packaging methodology.

The dismantling of the reactor internals will generate radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal, i.e., GTCC. Although the material is not classified as high-level waste, the DOE has indicated it will accept this waste for disposal at the future high-level waste repository. 124] However, the DOE has not been forthcoming with an acceptance criteria or disposition schedule for this material, and numerous questions remain as to the ultimate disposal cost and waste form requirements. As such, for purposes of this study, the GTCC has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. It is not anticipated that the DOE would accept this waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel.

Therefore, until such time the DOE is ready to accept GTCC waste, it is reasonable to assume that this material would remain in storage at the Oyster Creek site.

Intact disposal of the reactor vessel and internal components can provide savings in cost and worker exposure by eliminating the complex segmentation requirements, isolation of the GTCC material, TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-14554006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 11 of2l and transport/storage of the resulting waste packages. Portland General Electric (PGE) was able to dispose of the Trojan reactor as an intact package. However, its location on the Columbia River simplified the transportation analysis since:

the reactor package could be secured to the transport vehicle for the entire journey, i.e., the package was not lifted during transport, there were no man-made or natural terrain features between the plant site and the disposal location that could produce a large drop, and transport speeds were very low, limited by the overland transport vehicle and the river barge.

As a member of the Northwest Compact, PGE had a site available for disposal of the package - the US Ecology facility in Washington State.

The characteristics of this arid site proved favorable in demonstrating compliance with land disposal regulations.

It is not known whether this option will be available when Oyster.

Creek ceases operation. Future viability of this option will depend upon the ultimate location of the disposal site, as well as the disposal site licensee's ability to accept highly radioactive packages and effectively isolate them from the environment. Additionally, with BW.Rs, the diameter of the reactor vessel may severely limit overland transport. Consequently, the study assumes the reactor vessel will require segmentation, as a bounding condition.

3.4.3 Primary System Components Reactor recirculation piping is cut from the reactor vessel once the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and cutting operations in and around the vessel) is dropped below the nozzle zone. The piping is boxed and transported by shielded van. The reactor recirculation pumps and motors are lifted out intact, packaged, and transported for processing and/or disposal.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 12 of2l 3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine will be dismantled using conventional maintenance procedures. The turbine rotors and shafts will be removed to a laydown area. The lower turbine casings will be removed from their anchors by controlled demolition. The main condensers will also be disassembled and' moved to a laydown area. Material is then prepared for transportation to an off-site recycling facility where it will be surveyed and designated for either decontamination or volume reduction, conventional disposal, or controlled, disposal. Components will be packaged and readied for transport in accordance with the intended disposition.

3.4.5 Transportation Methods Contaminated piping, components, and structural material other than the highly activated reactor vessel and internal components will qualify as LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated Object, SCO-I or II, as described in Title 49.125] The contaminated material will be packaged in Industrial Packages (IP I, fI, or III, as defined in subpart 173.411) for transport unless demonstrated to qualify as their own shipping containers. The reactor vessel and internal components are expected to be transported in accordance with §71, as Type B. It is conceivable that the reactor, due to its limited specific activity, could qualify as LSA II or III. However, the high radiation levels on the outer surface would require that additional shielding be incorporated within the packaging so as to attenuate the dose to levels acceptable for transport.

Transport of the highly activated metal, produced in the segmentation of the reactor vessel and internal components, will be by shielded truck cask. Cask shipments may exceed 95,000 pounds, including vessel segment(s), supplementary shielding, cask tie-downs, and tractor-trailer.

The maximum level of activity per shipment assumed permissible was based upon the license limits of the available shielded transport casks.

The segmentation scheme for the vessel and internal segments is designed to meet these limits.

The transport of large intact components, e.g., large heat exchangers and other oversized components, will be by a combination of truck, rail, and/or multi-wheeled transporter.

The low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposal will be sent to one of two currently available burial facilities. Transportation costs TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,,Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 13 of2l are based upon the mileage to either the Envirocare facility in Clive, Utah, or the Barnwell facility in South Carolina. Memphis, Tennessee, is used as the destination for off-site processing. Transportation costs are estimated using published tariffs from Tri-State Motor Transit.12 6]

3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal To the greatest extent practical, metallic material generated in the decontamination and dismantling processes is treated to reduce the total volume requiring controlled disposal. The treated material, meeting the regulatory and/or site release criterion, is released as scrap, requiring no further cost consideration. Conditioning and recovery of the waste stream is performed off site at a licensed processing center.

Material requiring controlled disposal is packaged and transported to one of two currently available burial facilities. Very low-level radioactive material, e.g., structural steel and contaminated concrete, is sent to Envirocare. More highly'contaminated and activated material is sent to Barnwell. Disposal fees are based upon current charges for operating waste, with surcharges added for the highly activated components, e.g.,

generated in the segmentation of the reactor vessel.

3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning The NRC will terminate (or amend) the site licenses if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the license termination plan, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. The NRC's involvement in the decommissioning process will end at this point.

Building codes and environmental regulations will dictate the next step in the decommissioning process, as well as the owner's own future plans for the site.

Non-essential structures or buildings severely damaged in decontamination process are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. Concrete rubble generated from demolition activities is processed and made available as clean fill. The excavations will be regraded such that'the power block area will have a final contour consistent with adjacent surroundings.

The estimates assume the remediation of a significant volume of contaminated soil. This assumption may be affected by continued plant TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 14 of2l operations and/or future regulatory actions, such as the development of site-specific release criteria.

Asphalt surfaces in the immediate vicinity of the Oyster Creek site buildings are broken up and' the material used for backfill on site if needed.

3.5 ASSUMPTIONS The following are the major assumptions made in the development of the estimates for decommissioning the site.,

3.5.1 Estimating Basis The study follows the principles of ALARA through the use of work duration adjustment factors. These factors address the impact of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up training, and the use of respiratory protection and protective clothing. The factors lengthen a task's duration, increasing costs and lengthening the overall schedule. ALARA planning is considered in the costs for engineering and planning, and in the development of activity specifications and detailed procedures. Changes to worker exposure limits may impact the decommissioning cost and project schedule.

3.5.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to decontaminate and dismantle the nuclear units will be acquired through standard site contracting practices. The current cost of labor at the site is used as an estimating basis. Costs for site administration, operations, construction, and maintenance personnel are based upon average salary information provided by AmerGen Energy or from comparable industry information.

AmerGen Energy will hire a Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) to manage the decommissioning. The owner will provide site security, radiological health and safety, quality assurance and overall site administration during the decommissioning and demolition phases.

Contract personnel will provide engineering services, e.g., for preparing the activity specifications, work procedures, activation, and structural analyses, under the direction of AmerGen Energy.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006,'Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 15 of2l 3.5.3 Design Conditions Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 137Cs, 90Sr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major NSSS components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.

The curie contents of the vessel and internals at final shutdown are derived from those listed in NUREG/CR-3474.[271 Actual estimates are derived from the curie/gram values contained therein and adjusted for the different mass of the Oyster Creek components, projected operating life, and different periods of decay. Additional short-lived isotopes were derived from CR-0130128] and CR-0672,[29] and benchmarked to the long-lived values from CR-3474.

The disposal cost for the control blades removed from the vessel with the final core load is included within the estimates. Disposition of any blades stored in the pools from operations is considered an operating expense and therefore not accounted for in the estimates.

Activation of the reactor building structure is confined to the sacrificial shield. More extensive activation (at very low -levels) of the interior structures within containment has been detected at several reactors and the owners have elected to dispose of the affected material at a controlled facility rather than reuse the material as fill on site or send it to a landfill. The ultimate disposition of the material removed from the reactor building will depend upon the site release criteria selected, as well as the designated end use for the site.

3.5.4 General Transition Activities Existing warehouses will be cleared of non-essential material and remain for use by AmerGen Energy and its subcontractors. The plant's operating staff will perform the following activities at no additional cost or credit to the project during the transition period:

Drain and collect fuel oils, lubricating oils, and transformer oils for recycle and/or sale.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oldster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document Ei6.1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 16 of2l

• Drain and collect acids, caustics, and other chemical stores for recycle and/or sale.

Process operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates do not addiess the disposition of any legacy wastes; the disposal of operating wastes during this initial period is not considered a decommissioning expense.

Scran and Salvage The existing plant equipment is considered obsolete and suitable for scrap as deadweight quantities only. AmerGen Energy will make economically reasonable efforts to salvage equipment following final plant shutdown. However, dismantling techniques assumed by TLG for equipment in this analysis are not consistent with removal techniques required for salvage (resale) of equipment. Experience has indicated that some buyers wanted equipment stripped down to very specific requirements before they would consider purchase. This required expensive rework after the equipment had been removed from its installed location. Since placing a salvage value on this machinery and equipment would be speculative, and the value would be small in comparison to the overall decommissioning expenses, this analysis does not attempt to quantify the value that an owner may realize based upon those efforts.

It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that any value received from the sale of scrap generated in the dismantling process would be more than offset by the on-site processing costs. The dismantling techniques assumed in the decommissioning estimates do not include the additional cost for size reduction and preparation to meet "furnace ready" conditions. For example, the recovery of copper from electrical cabling may require the removal and disposition of any contaminated insulation, an added expense. With a volatile market, the potential profit margin in scrap recovery is highly speculative, regardless of the' ability to free release this material. This assumption is an implicit' recognition of scrap value in the disposal of clean metallic waste at no additional cost to the project.

Furniture, tools, mobile equipment such as forklifts, trucks, bulldozers, and other property owned by AmerGen Energy will be removed at no cost or credit to the decommissioning project. Disposition may include relocation to other facilities. Spare parts will also be made available for alternative use.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 17 of2l Energv For estimating purposes, the plant is assumed to be de-energized, with the exception of those facilities associated with spent fuel storage.

Replacement power costs are used for the cost of energy consumption during decommissioning for tooling, lighting, ventilation, and essential services.

Insurance Costs for continuing coverage (nuclear liability and property insurance) following cessation of plant operations and during decommissioning are included and based upon current operating premiums. Reductions in premiums, throughout the decommissioning process, are based upon the guidance and the limits for, coverage defined in the NRC's proposed rulemaking "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors."[ 3 0]

The NRC's financial protection requirements are based on various reactor (and spent fuel) configurations.

Taxes Property taxes are included for all decommissioning periods with the exception of the transition phase.

Site Modifications The perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will be moved, as appropriate, to conform to the Site Security Plan in force during the various stages of the project.

3.6 COST ESTIMATE

SUMMARY

A schedule of expenditures for each scenario is provided in Tables 3.1 through 3.3. Decommissioning costs are reported in the year of projected expenditure; however, the values are provided in thousands of 2003 dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure. The annual expenditures are based upon the detailed activity costs reported in Appendices C through E, along with the schedule discussed in Section 4.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 18 of2l TABLE 3.1 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES DECON (thousands, 2003 dollars)

Year A, 1 Equipment &

Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 27,562 46,627 41,990 37,003 36,832 34,570 21,881 16,386 13,124 2,990 2,990 2,998 2,990 2,990 2,990 2,998 2,990 2,990 2,991 1,493 448 9,969 14,372 5,622 5,485 4,899 1,794 8,875 8,671 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

335 1,286 526 711 683 543 539 481 212 88 61 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 35 21 17,258 48,241 20,919 20,483 17,051

.2,641 7

0 0

0 0

' 0 0

0

• 0 0

.0 6

719 15,282 32,722 17,993 14,881 14,797 12,204 7,445 4,566 2,674 2,543 2,543 2,552 2,543 2,543 2,543 2,552 4,153 5,303 11,642 2,414 43,840 107,286 123,280 78,968 78,135 69,205 33,973 29,922 24,529 5,555 5,555 5,572 5,555 5,555 5,555 5,572 7,165 8,315 14,994 5,948 307,385 61,755 4,095 127,345 163,897 664,477 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 19 of2l TABLE 3.2 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES DELAYED DECON (thousands, 2003 dollars)

Year Labor Equipment &

Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 23,621 27,331 5,134 5,148 5,134 5,134 5,134 5,148 5,134 5,134 5,134 5,148 5,134 5,134 5,134 5,148 5,134 15,715 40,761 38,665 43,293 33,206 15,505 14,005 448 3,662 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 345 5,655 13,238 8,341 4,825 7,461 10,365 526 678 539 541 539 539 539 541 539 539 539 541 539 539 539 541 539 539 539 541 425 302 98 66 21 1,963 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 3,534 32,351 35,619 22,169 11 0

3,138 15,938 4,179 4,192 4,179 4,179 4,179 4,192 4,179 4,179 4,179 4,192 4,179 4,179 4,179 4,192 6,019 12,193 16,232 9,792 6,211 7,555 5,212 1,874 27,754 49,571

.9,955 9,983 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,983 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,983 9,955 9,955 9,955 9,983 11,795 28,821 66,721 94,585 93,889 68,057 28,285 26,310 329,161 55,444 11,808 96,132 142,724 635,270 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 20 of2l TABLE 3.3 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES SAFSTOR (thousands, 2003 dollars)

X, 1 Equipment &

Labor Materials Year Energy Burial Other Total 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 23,621 27,331 5,134 5,148 5,134 4,715 3,31'4 3,323 3,314 3,314 3,314 3,323 3,314 3,314 3,314 3,323 3,314 3,314 3,312 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871.

2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 448 3,662 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 526 678 539 541 539 432 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 21 1,963 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 11,809 27,430 14,534 14,574 14,534 11,864 2,932 2,941 2,932 2,932 2,932 2,941 2,932 2,932 2,932 2,941 4,542 5,692 5,691 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 36,425 61,063 20,309 20,365 20,309 17,113 6,420 6,439 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,439 6,420 6,420 6,420 6,439 8,030 9,180 9,178 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 21 of2l TABLE 3.3 (continued)

SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES SAFSTOR (thousands, 2003 dollars)

Equipment &

Materials Year Labor Energy Burial Other Total 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 2,871 2,863 2,863 2,863 10,930 36,160 43,816 44,287 30,755 15,478 12,584 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 261 4,088 15,361 8,075 4,247 8,668 9,505 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 235 539 539 412 278 91 59 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 2,400 32,857 36,086 18,643 8

0 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 2,648 2,640 2,640 2,640 4,416 8,869 11,503 5,993 8,099 4,377 1,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 5,694 5,678 5,678 5,678 15,871 52,056 104,076 94,854 62,022 28,622 23,827 411,347 58,222 8,933 93,546 280,064 852,113 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006,*Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 1 of 7

4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE The schedules for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this study follow the sequence presented in the AIF1NESP-036 study, with minor changes to reflect iecent experience and site-specific constraints. In addition, the scheduling has been revised to reflect the spent fuel management plans described in Section 3.4.1.

A schedule or sequence of activities is presented in Figure 4.1 for the DECON decommissioning alternative. The schedule is also representative of the work activities identified in the delayed dismantling scenarios, absent any spent fuel constraints. The scheduling sequence assumes that fuel is removed from the spent fuel pool within the first 51/2 years after operations cease. The key activities listed in the schedule do not reflect a one-to-one correspondence with those activities in the cost tables, but reflect dividing some activities for clarity and combining Pthers for convenience. The schedule was prepared using the "Microsoft Project 2002" computer software.i3 11 4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedule reflects the results of a precedence network developed for the site decommissioning activities, i.e., a PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) Software Package. The work activity durations used in the precedence network reflect the actual man-hour estimates from the cost tables, adjusted by stretching certain activities over their slack range and shifting the start and end dates of others. The following assumptions were made in the development of the decommissioning schedule:

The reactor building is isolated until such time that all spent fuel has been discharged from the spent fuel pool to the DOE or to the ISFSI.

Decontamination and dismantling of the storage pool is initiated once the transfer of spent fuel to the ISFSI is complete.

All work (except vessel and internals removal) is performed during an 8-hour workday, 5 days per week, with no overtime. There are eleven paid holidays per year.

Reactor and internals removal activities are performed by using separate crews for different activities working on different shifts, with a corresponding backshift charge for the second shift.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 2 of 7 Multiple crews work parallel activities to the maximum extent possible, consistent with optimum efficiency, adequate access for cutting, removal and laydown space, and with the stringent safety measures necessary during demolition of heavy components and structures.

For plant systems removal, the systems with the longest removal durations in areas on the critical path are considered to determine the duration of the activity.

4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The period-dependent costs presented in the detailed cost tables are based upon the durations developed in the schedule for decommissioning Oyster Creek.

Durations are established between several milestones in each project period; these durations are used to establish a critical path for the entire project. In turn, the critical path duration for each period is used as the basis for determining the period-dependent costs. A second critical path is also shown for the spent fuel cooling period, which determines the release of the reactor building for final decontamination.

Project timelines are provided in Figures 4.2 through 4.4. Milestone dates are based on a shutdown date of April 9, 2009. The start of decommissioning operations in the Delayed Decommissioning scenario is concurrent with the end of the fuel transfer activity, i.e. to an off-site DOE facility.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 3 of 7 FIGURE 4.1 ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

[ask Name

_01 i rw Oyster Creek schedule Shutdown Unit 1 Period la Unit I -Shutdown through transition Certificate of permanent cessation of operations submitted Fuel storage pool operations Dry fuel storage operations Reconfigure plant Prepare activity specifications Perform site characterization PSDAR submitted Written certificate of permanent removal of fuel submitted Site specific decommissioning cost estimate submitted DOC staff mobilized Period lb Unit I - Decommissioning preparations Fuel storage pool operations Reconfigure plant (continued)

Dry fuel storage operations Prepare detailed wort procedures Decon NSSS Isolate spent fuel pool Period 2a Unit 1 -Large component removal Fuel storage pool operations Dry fuel storage operations Preparation for reactor vessel removal Reactor vessel & internals

• I 4

4 M

0 M

Eli I '1.l6 i

7_16l

_19 Remaining large NSSS components disposition TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 4 of 7 FIGURE 4.1 ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)

TaskName

• 1 U6 I X I v ! 09 ! lFL:!

Non-essential systems 1,

Main turbine/generator Main condenser License termination plan submitted Period 2b Unit I -Decontamination (wet fuel)

Fuel storage pool operations Dry fuel storage operations Remorve systems 'not supporting wet fuel storage Decon buildings not supporting wet fuel storage License termination plan approved Fuel storage pool available for decommissioning Period 2c Unit 1 - Decontamination following wet fuel storage L_

I t12 j1 1 1 14 1 15 0

E 3

-'151 17 ! '181 X19

° Dry fuel storage operations Remove remaining systems Decon wet fuel storage area Period 2d Unit I-Delay before license termination Period 2e Unit 1. Plant license termination Dry fuel storage operations Final Site Survey NRC review & approval Part 60 license terminated Period 3b Unit I. Site restoration Dry fuel storage operations Building demolitions backfill and landscaping 3

r.

l TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 5 of 7 FIGURE 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DECON (not to scale)

(Shutdown April 9, 2009)

Pool and ISFSI Operations ISFSI Operations I

Period 1 Transition and Period 2 Decommissioning Period 3

. Site ISFSI Operations ISFSI 04/2009 10/2010 03/2016 10/2017 12/2027 06/2028 Storage Pool Empty 10/2014 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 6 of 7 FIGURE 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DELAYED DECON (not to scale)

I,

I (Shutdown April 9, 2009)

Spent Fuel Storage Period 1 Period 2 Dormancy Period 3 Period 4 Decommissioning Period 5 04/2009 10/2010 07/2026 12/2027 05/2031 12/2032 Storage Pool Empty 12/2027 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 7 of 7 FIGURE 4.4 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE SAFSTOR (not to scale)

(Shutdown April 9, 2009)

Spent Fuel Storage Period 1 Transition and Preparations I Period 2 Dormancy Period 3 Delayed Preparations Period 4 Decommissioning Period 5 Site I Restoration I I

I I

1.

I.

0 I 04/2009 20I 1012010 08/2064 04/2069 10/2070 02/2066 Storage Pool Empty 10/2014 ISFSI Empty 12/2027 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station I

Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 1 of 5

5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives of the decommissioning process are the removal of all radioactive material from the site that would restrict'its future use and the termination of the NRC license(s). This currently requires the'remediation of all radioactive material at the site in excess of applicable legal limits. Under the Atomic Energy Act,[32] the NRC is responsible for protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the production, utilization, and disposal of radioactive materials and processes.; In particular, §71 defines radioactive material and §61 specifies its disposition.

Most of the materials being transported for controlled burial are categorized as Low Specific Activity (LSA) or Surface Contaminated Object (SCO) materials containing Type A quantities, as defined in 49 CFR §173-178. Shipping containers are required to be Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2 or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411). For this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete. Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.

'The volumes of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site is shown on a line-item basis in Appendix C, D, and E and summarized in Tables 5.1 through 5.3. The quantified waste volume summaries shown in these tables are consistent with §61 classifications. The volumes are calculated based on the exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the displaced volume of components serving as their own waste containers.

The reactor vessel and internals are categorized as large quantity shipments and, accordingly, will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping' canisters.

No process system containing/handling radioactive substances at shutdown is presumed to meet material release criteria by decay alone, i.e., systems radioactive at shutdown will still be radioactive over the time period during which the decommissioning is accomplished, due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides.

While the dose rates decrease with time, radionuclides such as 137CS Wil still control the disposition requirements.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 2 of5 The waste material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of Oyster Creek is primarily generated during Period 2 of the DECON alternative and Period 4 of the deferred alternatives. Material that is considered potentially contaminated when removed from the radiologically controlled area is sent to processing facilities in Tennessee for conditioning and disposal. Heavily contaminated components and activated materials are routed for controlled disposal. The disposal volumes reported in the tables reflect the savings resulting from reprocessing and recycling.

For purposes of constructing the analysis, the rate schedule for the Barnwell facility was used as a proxy for the higher activity waste. This schedule was used to estimate the disposal fees for most plant components and all activated concrete unsuitable for processing or recovery. An average disposal rate of approximately $315 per cubic foot was used, with additional surcharges for activity, dose rate, and/or handling added as appropriate for the particular package.

The remaining volume 6f contaminated metallic and concrete debris is processed and conditioned at a Duratek facility. The contaminated metallic waste stream includes the lower activity components such as miscellaneous steel, metal siding, scaffolding, and structural steel. Metals are recycled at a unit rate of $1.99 per pound. Concrete, soil, asbestos and other bulk debris are disposed of at a rate of $1.00 per pound or approximately $100 per cubic foot. Dry active wastes, e.g., cloth, paper and plastics, are sent to the Envirocare facility for direct disposal from the site at $2.87 per pound or $57.40 per cubic foot, at an assumed density of 20 pounds per cubic foot.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 3 of 5 TABLE 5.1 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

DECON Waste Class' Volume (cubic feet)

Weight (pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Barnwell, South Carolina (contaminated/activated metallic waste and concrete)

A B

C.

• 68,944 11,820 631 5,996,132 1,731,981 37,795 Envirocare, Utah (miscellaneous steel, contaminated/activated concrete)

Containerized Bulk A

A 19,647 208,188 1,706,435 17,995,060 Geologic Repository (Greater-than Class C) 411 72,900 Total 2 309,641 27,540,303 Processed Waste (Off-Site) 386,250 Scrap Metal 45,702,000 I

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oydster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 4 of 5 TABLE 5.2 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

DELAYED DECON Waste Class' Volume (cubic feet)

Weight (pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Barnwell, South Carolina (contaminated/activated metallic waste and concrete)

A B

C 37,887 6,686 287 3,312,336, 909,192 32,125 Envirocare, Utah (miscellaneous steel, contaminated/activated concrete)

Containerized Bulk A

I A 16,858 186,753 1,463,684 15,512,240 Geologic Repository (Greater-than Class C)

>C 411 72,900 Total 2 248,882 21,302,477 Processed Waste (Off-Site) 462,227 Scrap Metal 45,702,000 I

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-14556006, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 5.3 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

SAFSTOR Waste Class' Volume (cubic feet)

Weight (pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Barnwell, South Carolina (contaminated/activated metallic waste and concrete)

A B

C.

37,456 6,405 287 3,216,877 873,677 32,125 Envirocare, Utah (miscellaneous steel, contaminated/activated concrete)

Containerized Bulk A

A 16,591 205,297 1,432,314 16,215,750 Geologic Repository (Greater-than Class C)

>C 411 72,900 Total 2 266,447 21,843,643 Processed Waste (Off-Site) 456,585 Scrap Metal 45,702,000 I

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 1 of 6

6. RESULTS The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Oyster Creek relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis preparbd in 1997-99. While not an engineering study, the estimates provide AmerGen Energy with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.

The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements. The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the plant's spent fuel pool for a minimum of 5V2 years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies. For the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, spent fuel will be offloaded to the ISFSI until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer of the assemblies to its repository. The spent fuel remains in the storage pool in the Delayed DECON alternative.

The cost projected to promptly decommission (DECON) Oyster Creek is estimated to be $664:5 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 72.3%) is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the license can be terminated. Another 21.3% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel. The remaining 6.4% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.

The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 through 6.3, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.

Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost. The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as. well as the duration of the program. It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that AmerGen Energy will oversee the decommissioning program, using a DOC to manage the decommissioning labor force and the associated subcontractors. The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.

However, once the operating license is terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site, and the long-term care of the spent fuel (for the DECON alternative).

As described in this report, the spent fuel pool will remain operational for a minimum of 51/2 years following the cessation of operations. The pool will be isolated TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 2 of 6 and an independent spent fuel island created. This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area. Over the 5Y2-year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into transportable steel canisters for loading into a DOE-provided transport cask (DECON and SAFSTOR alternatives only). The canisters will be stored in concrete overpacks at the ISFSI until the DOE is able to receive them. Dry storage of the fuel under a separate license provides additional flexibility in the event the DOE is not able to meet the current timetable for completing the transfer of assemblies to an off-site facility, and minimizes the associated caretaking expenses.

The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste. As described in Section 5, disposal of the lower level material, including concrete and structural steel, is at the Envirocare facility. The more highly radioactive material is sent to the Barnwell facility, with the exception of selected reactor vessel components. Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment, are packaged for geologic disposal. The cost of geologic disposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.

A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility. Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and' sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction. The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities. The cost identified in the summary table for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.

Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.

Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon prevailing union wages. Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process.

The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage.

With a

work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license. Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 3 of 6 The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report. For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.

Decontaminatioi'is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure. Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ. Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear unit.

License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings. The status of any plant components and 'materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.

The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance. While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 4 of 6 TABLE 6.1

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DECON (thousands of 2003 dollars)

Work Category Cost Decontamination 14,149 2.1 Removal 106,014 16.0 Packaging 12,406 1.9 Transportation 5,561 0.8 Waste Disposal 96,915 14.6 Off-site Waste Processing 36,757 5.5 Program Management [1]

236,572 35.6 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 9,332 1.4 ISFSI Related (non-operating) 81,723 12.3 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 18,601 2.8 Energy 4,095 0.6 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 10,191 1.5 Property Taxes 20,638 3.1 Miscellaneous Equipment 5,998 0.9 Site O&M 5,526 0.8 Total [2]

664,477 100.0 NRC License Termination 480,331 72.3 Spent Fuel Management 141,648 21.3 Site Restoration 42,498 6.4 I'] Includes engineering and security 121 Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 5 of 6 TABLE 6.2

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DELAYED DECON (thousands of 2003 dollars)

Work Category Cost Decontamination 18,113 2.9 Removal 95,991 15.1 Packaging 8,829 1.4 Transportation, 4,258 0.7 Waste Disposal 58,593 9.2 Off-site Waste Processing 43,866 6.9 Program Management [1]

261,672 41.2 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 9,332 1.5 ISFSI Related (non-operating) 38,655 6.1 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 31,133 4.9 Energy 11,808 1.9 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 11,524 1.8 Property Taxes 25,513 4.0 Miscellaneous Equipment 9,183 1.4 Site O&M 6,798 1.1 Total 12]

635,270 100.0 NRC License Termination 414,583 65.3 Spent Fuel Management 175,539 27.6 Site Restoration 45,148 7.1 II Includes engineering and security 121 Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455 006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 6 of 6 TABLE 6.3

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS SAFSTOR (thousands of 2003 dollars)

Work Category Cost Decontamination 18,035 2.1 Removal 99,217 11.6 Packaging 8,949 1.1 Transportation 4,282 0.5 Waste Disposal 56,405 6.6 Off-site Waste Processing 43,468 5.1 Program Management [I]

343,367 40.3 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 9,332 1.1 ISFSIRelated (non-operating) 77,603 9.1 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 69,823 8.2 Energy 8,933 1.0 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 11,524 1.4 Property Taxes 67,209 7.9 Miscellaneous Equipment 16,269 1.9 Site O&M 17,696 2.1 Total [2]

852,113 100.0 NRC License Termination 610,009 71.6 Spent Fuel Management 196,982 23.1 Site Restoration 45,122 5.3 Il] Includes engineering and security 121 Columns may not add due to rounding TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 1 of3

7. REFERENCES

1.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72, "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June' 27, 1988.

2.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," October 2003.

3.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination."

4.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50, "Entombment Options for Power Reactors," Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register Volume 66, Number 200, October 16, 2001.

5.

U.S.

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2,

50 and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,"

Nuclear. Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61 (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996.

6.

"Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982.

7.

Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, and Yankee Atomic Power Company v. United States, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision, Docket No. 99-5138, -5139, -5140, August 31, 2000.

8.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses."

9.

"Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act," Public Law 96-573, 1980.

10.

"Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, January 15, 1986.

11.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination," Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 139 (p 39058 et seq.), July 21, 1997.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 2 of 3

7. REFERENCES (continued)

12.

"Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination," EPA Memorandum OSWER No. 9200.4-18, August 22, 1997.

13.

U.S.

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16, "Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems."

14.

"Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites," OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002.

15.

'Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM),"

NUREG/CR-1575, Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, August 2000.

16.

"Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," Document No. GO1-1271-003, TLG Services, Inc., February 1999.

17.

T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.

18.

W.J. Manion and T.S. LaGuardia, "Decommissioning Handbook," U.S.

Department of Energy, DOE/EV/10128-1, November 1980.

19.

"Building Construction Cost Data 2003," Robert Snow Means Company, Inc.,

Kingston, Massachusetts.

20.

Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p. 239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984.

21.

'Technical, Schedule, and Cost Uncertainties of the Yucca Mountain Repository Project," GAO-02-191, December 2001.

22.

"Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report," DOE/RW-0457, March 1995.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 3 of3

7. REFERENCES (continued)

23.

"Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Total System Description,"

Revision 02 (TDR-CRW-SE-000002), DOE/RW-0500, September 2001.

24.

"Strategy'for Management and Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste," Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (p 13424 et seq.), March 1995.

25.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, "Transportation," Parts 173 through 178, 1996.

26.

Tri-State Motor Transit Company, published tariffs, Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-109397 and Supplements, 2000.

27.

J.C. Evans et al., "Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. August 1984.

28.

R.I. Smith, G.J. Konzek, W.E. Kennedy, Jr.,. "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station,"

NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1978.

29.

H.D. Oak, et al., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1980.

30.

"Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors," 10 CFR Parts 50 and 140, Federal Register Notice, Vol. 62, No. 210, October 30, 1997.

31.

"Microsoft Project 2002," Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 2002.

32.

"Atomic Energy Act of 1954," (68 Stat. 919).

TLG Services, Inc.

Oldster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis

• Document E16-1455.006,.Rev. 0 AppendixA, Page 1 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16.1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example:

Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger < 3,000 lbs.

1.

SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing < 3,000 lbs. will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected from the inlet and outlet piping. The heat exchanger will be sent to the waste processing area.

2.

CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes)

(minutes)*

a Remove insulation 60 (b) b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 c

Install contamination controls 20 (b) d Disconnect'inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e

Cap openings 20 (d) f Rig for removal 30 30 g

Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h

Remove contamination controls 15 15 i

Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):

+ Respiratory protection adjustment (25% of critical duration) 64

+ Radiation/ALARA adjustment (30% of critical duration) 77 Adjusted work duration 396

+ Protective clothing adjustment (30% of adjusted duration) 119 Productive work duration 515

+ Work break adjustment (8.33 % of productive duration) 43 Total work duration (minutes) 558 Total duration = 9.300 hr ***

• alpha designators indicate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006,.Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 3 of4 APPENDIX A (continued)

3.

LABOR REQUIRED Crew NumberDuration Rate (hours)

Cost

($/hr)

Laborers 3.00 9.300

$38.21

$1,066.06 Craftsmen 2.00 9.300

$52.14

$969.80 Foreman' 1.00 9.300

$54.76

$509.27 General Foreman 0.25 9.300

$57.72

$134.20 Fire Watch 0.05 9.300

$38.21

$17.77 Health Physics Technician 1.00 9.300

$36.12

$335.92 Total labor cost

$3,033.02

4.

EQUIPMENT & CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs Consumables/Materials Costs

-Blotting paper 50 @ $0.42 sq ft {2}

-Plastic sheets/bags 50 @ $0.10/sq ft {3)

-Gas torch consumables 1 @ $4.16/hr x 1 hr {1)

Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead & profit on equipment and materials @ 16.00 %

Total costs, equipment & material TOTAL COST:

Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pounds:

none

$21.00

$5.00

$4.16

$30.16

$4.83

$34.99

$3,068.01 Total labor cost:

Total equipment/material costs:

Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:

$3,033.02

$34.99 67.890 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis AppendixA, Page 4 of4

5.

NOTES AND REFERENCES Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI) program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates arnd are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the "Guidelines for Producihg ' Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommfissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.

• References for equipment & consumables costs:

1. www.mcmaster.com online catalog, item 7193785

2. R.S. Means (2003) Section 01540-800-0200, page 17

3. R.S. Means (2003) Section 01590-400-6360, page 25

• Mate4al and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Camden, New Jersey.

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis

• Document E16-1455O006, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 1 of 8 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docunent E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 2 of8 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)

Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 0.43 Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 4.48 Removal of clean pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 6.48 Removal of clean pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 12.69 Removal of clean pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 24.44 Removal of clean pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 31.63 Removal of clean pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 46.57 Removal of clean pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 55.39 Removal of clean valves >2 to 4 inches 83.88 Removal of clean valves >4 to 8 inches 126.92 Removal of clean valves >8 to 14inches 244.35 Removal of clean valves >14 to 20 inches 316.29 Removal of clean valves >20 to 36 inches 465.69 Removal of clean valves >36 inches 553.90 Removal of clean pipe hangers for small bore piping 26.07 Removal of clean pipe hangers for large bore piping 96.42 Removal of clean pumps, <300 pound 211.14 Removal of clean pumps, 300-1000 pound 593.35 Removal of clean pumps, 1000-10,000 pound 2,356.59 Removal of clean pumps, >10,000 pound 4,547.23 Removal of clean pump motors, 300-1000 pound 251.24 Removal of clean pump motors, 1000-10,000 pound 983.97 Removal of clean pump motors, >10,000 pound 2,213.94 Removal of clean heat exchanger <3000 pound 1,261.46 Removal of clean heat exchanger >3000 pound 3,161.00 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 3 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor I.

I CostlUnit($)

Removal of clean tanks, <300 gallons Removal of clean tanks, 300-3000 gallon Removal of clean tanks, >3000 gallons, $/square foot surface area Removal of clean electrical equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 271.95 863.17 7.24 116.97 409.06 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean electrical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of clean electrical transformers < 30 tons Removal of clean electrical transformers > 30 tons Removal of clean standby diesel-generator, <100 kW 818.12 1,949.14 1,353.65 3,898.29 1,382.64 Removal of clean standby diesel-generator, 100 kW to 1 MW Removal of clean standby diesel-generator, >1 MW Removal of clean electrical cable tray, $/linear foot Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear foot Removal of clean mechanical equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, <300 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of clean HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of clean HVAC ductwork, $/pound Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 3,086.15 6,388.94 10.81 4.71 116.97 409.06 818.12 1,949.14 116.97 409.06 818.12 1,949.14 0.45 1.08 14.78 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006,. Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 4 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor CostfLnit($)

Removal of contaminated pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/Linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated valves >2 to 4 inches Removal of contaminated valves >4 to 8 inches Removal of contaminated valves >8 to 14 inches Removal of contaminated valves >14 to 20 inches Removal of contaminated valves >20 to 36 inches Removal of contaminated valves >36 inches Removal of contaminated pipe hangers for small bore piping Removal of contaminated pipe hangers for large bore piping Removal of contaminated pumps, <300 pound 25.53 40.90 80.28 96.33 133.86 159.41 315.19 374.12 772.69 981.06 1,308.47 1,563.91 83.60 275.50 655.84 Removal of contaminated pumps, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated pumps, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated pumps, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated pump motors, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated pump motors, 1000-10,000 pound 1,537.13 5,201.62 12,630.87 655.43 2,105.39 Removal of contaminated pump motors, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pound Removal of contaminated heat exchanger >3000 pound Removal of contaminated feedwater heater/deaerator Removal of contaminated moisture separator/reheater 4,737.44 3,068.01 8,859.03 22,254.36 48,879.96 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 5 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor I

Cost/Unit($)

Removal of contaminated tanks, <300 gallons Removal of contaminated tanks, >300 gallons, $/square foot Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, <300 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated electrical conduit, $/linear foot Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, <300 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, <800 pound Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork, $/pound Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components, $/linear in.

Additional decontamination of surface by washing, $/square foot Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing, $/square foot 1,088.77 22.32 514.43 1,251.83 2,403.35 4,820.06 25.08 11.69 577.41 1,411.23 2,709.06 4,820.06 577.41 1,411.23 2,709.06 4,820.06 2.32 2.84 5.71 26.02 Decontamination rig hook-up and flush Chemical flush of components/systems, $/gallon Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of grade slab concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 4,912.13 10.63 67.11 175.76 288.98 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 6 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)

Removal of sections of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete wt#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 872.98 192.04 1,452.40

.242.90 1,918.52 Removal heavily rein concrete wt#18 rebar & steel embedments, $/cu yd Removal of below-grade suspended floors, $/cubic yard Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard Removal of clean foundation concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, $/cubic yard Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of clean solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard Backfill of below-grade voids, $/cubic yard Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear foot Placement of concrete for below-grade voids, $/cubic yard Excavation of clean material, $/cubic yard Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic yard Excavation of submerged concrete rubble, $/cubic yard Removal of clean concreterubble (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard Removal of contaminated concrete rubble, $/cubic yard Removal of building by volume, $/cubic foot 377.78 288.98 730.34 1,452.56 570.79 1,351.06 25.86 67.75 181.41 67.75 181.41 15.19 130.08 90.96 2.45 27.17 11.89 85.06 22.01 0.23 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 AppendixB, Page 7 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor Il I

CostlUnit($)

Removal of clean building metal siding, $/square foot Removal of contaminated building metal siding, $/square foot Removal of standard asphalt roofing, $/square foot Removal of transite panels, $/square foot Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill & spall)

Scabbling contaminated concrete floors, $/square foot Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, $/square foot Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square foot Scabbling structural steel, $/square foot Removal of clean overhead cranes/monorails < 10 ton capacity Removal of contaminated overhead cranes/monorails < 10 ton capacity Removal of clean overhead cranes/monorails >10-50 ton capacity Removal of contaminated overhead cranes/monorails >10-50 ton capacity Removal of polar cranes/> 50 ton capacity, each Removal of gantry cranes > 50 ton capacity, each Removal of clean structural steel, $/pound Removal of clean steel floor grating, $/square foot Removal of contaminated steel floor grating, $/square foot Removal of clean free-standing steel liner, $/square foot Removal of contaminated free-standing steel liner, $/square foot 1.24 3.24 2.00 2.02 9.52 5.55 6.21 55.86 4.72 575.52 1,318.24 1,381.26 3,151.81 5,778.86 24,364.28 0.32 2.95 7.22 10.85 25.84 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, $/square foot Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas, $/square foot Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre 5.42 30.05 12.05 17.78 15,370.28 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Appendix B,. Page 8 of 8 APPENDIX B (continued)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)

Cost of CPC B-88 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-25 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of LSA drum & preparation for use 1,051.61 838.58 720.97 3,999.47 115.13 Cost of cask liner for CNSI 14-195 cask Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8-120A cask (resins)

Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8-120A cask (filters)

Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square foot

! 8,226.15 5,779.18 5,779.18 0.60 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16 1455.006, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page I of 15 I,

I APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSES DECON TLG Services, Inc.

cOfrt Crv-k N-ft1rro, 8nlo SlrHa,,

D.'e,,doofo Col A.Otvd.

~Waerstl14S5.OA Rt. 0 App"dbr C, Por 2 or 15 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) lAI ts 05.8."

LLRW NRC Spo-tF-I S"

ProcrI 8,1 Vol

.ibmnl U.l.

d D0.0 Roa PgAing Trnoopot Psisg Dtp"l Od.

at.

Total Ut T.

Il at Rato Vol Cl..A CaS B Cl..iC GTCC P-d Cnft Core:or I Cast Ca"t Cost Coot C oa.

e oCa Casts o

Ca, Coat C".

- Costs C. Fas Ca. Fst Co. Fr Cr. Foot C. Fas M Lbs.

Mo.

Monh.

I -Ads atf oosatplbn PERIOD I. Shldowr Soit.gl Trrnrallo Peetd 1s Dt Oc.tsiadg Adhks 1.1.1 P

p.V

• Ay I.CtAst.l g Chas 11.12 Norots ofndsotasofOtato 11.3 Roo l aW..-

W.mW lI4 No0th5. of Ps I.oA DIootg I St 5 OD.ats PWn qsltV4 & >sess 0

1.1e P.*. oKI PSDAR 10.1.?

R',

pbl ds A&

4

10. 18 P09.

dtlod.54ast e

10.1.9 Erslnot by.sA kbosot

1. 1.10 End podmd dosaleaso 1.1.11 DomW by~~B0hw8 10.1.12 Ddhs.,soce

_w eoo 1113 P.Etd oSERadoEA W1.14 PotIo Sl*tSeadlc Cod de

.d 10.1.15 P

rpstsh Lok Ton lno Ptln ta.lS R".'. NRC a sd o oneo Ae6* Sp09COoo 10.1.17.1 Plant & to.

fdlbss 1.1.12 PISb Ynl.

1.1.17T.3 NSSS D hn Fkah 10.1.17.1 Rea'-4ssses I1.1176 Rewfiods--Id 1s.117 Mt1sb1,o so1toisl"d t

10 16 RoN1tvoa-stesla

1. 1.1 TS S*i u&ad-1.1.1.1Pt.t5e aeeastoo D

Orstoh 10.1.17.11 Dr."

to 1.17.12 Pwosbu5.", a k&%w~og 10.1.17.13 Wo We*snAt 1a.1.17.14 Fed"y& sftd.4 10.1.17 ToW p nnkV & Sb. PFp-A

10. 1.18 Ptnpv oSanat 0540.0O

1. 1.19 P

P..

A t.

trs 1)120 D0.W.w d-o p

m 10.1.21 RlggCn tEMobPWiNoglo 1.122 Fac

-5wt s

101

.S0t01t Pod 1. AdMrt Coat Patod 10 CUlWI Cost 10.3.1 3 1 S9 Foo C td o TdT.a 1.3 Std. PFbd 10 C dbl Coot.

P0e9410 PIttod-oe.

Cs%

10.4.1 h

10.42 Plpt bo.os 1

h.4.8 1 pby gper 10.4.4 HNos" osblt 10*5 Dls d DAWg t

1.46 P"" oo "y, 4~p 1A.4.T NRC FOo 1&.4 Eno-gs, Pb-*V Fo 1049 Sk ODAMCodl 97 Is 112 112 nh 1100

.150 3 S9

.75 75 97 232

.375 307 22 172 172 52 396 396 11 M

M 11 B

8e 15 112 112 84 648 646 35 267 267 56 431 431 46 313 353 2.000

~4.600

• .000 1.000 7.500 3.100 4.098

.369 319 312 37 75 120' 312' 120 234 1345 6?"

55 424 3'1 47 359 323 6

43 43 80 612 612 n

580 M04 6

43 43 11 M6 as 16 138 69 47 359 359 22 172 172 1S 139 138 35 269 134 52 396 396 10 78 39 479 3.878 3.35 27 207 207 363 2.782 2.762 16 121 121 307 2.355 2.355 14 105 106 1.5513 11.97 11.587 42 36 69 134

.31 320 320 4.S20 4.167 500 7.100 C000 1.00D 1.600 4.167 2.000 1600 3.120 900 42.674 2.400 1.4,00

.1

.'M 78.600 160 2.419

2. 196 2.048 92 10.354

.10.300 10.300 1.545 11.U45 1.545 11.845 11,845 11.645 221 2889 1.3 9

5 1

23

• I371 20101 1n 1.907 1.907 55 8

278 43 331 33I 5

35 30 94 719 719 37 408 408 10 ItI 37 257 287 I

8 103 99 TLG73 Rr,.,

se.

Owl..r Cl* N-owr 1..-.ti,.

StaI.H.

Do"^o,~,~I*,IrnIn Co-t A-oGlwr.

Dor..tI EIB145S.00 Rrr. 0 Appndtr C, Pag.3 of ZS Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Teoosa.da or2003 Dollars)

I AdF On1.m4 LLRW NRC Swnl F.n S..

P-d 0,B Vooo a8 I

UW/y I

D.. een r

0 Pod8 l.0 Tspood P-cosbgn O1.p-o 010 Totl Toutl L. T Va.o.q.

-fl aab-V okmo CAvnA Clo.o.

Cb..

CGTCC Pftwes-d C."

Co-e c e-b ee e-~d e- -

o~

r-

-O C F-e.rF er.

ezr czr CW

• ".n.ou U.nF Adl DpNon P.44d1* P dOowndt Comst (t 1.4.10 SpOe FoeI PoO OU 1&.4.11 ISFSI OpWqg Cosol 1*4.12 S.-iry SUN Com 124.13 UUiy Stffn Cos 184 S

f 01 Paod Is Pao.-Dp..dt Co sb 18.0 TOTAL PERIOO s1 COST PERIOD lb. D.o IssioM.9g Pnm l.o

• 6.

145 1.113 71 11 82 w

9es 145 1.114 1.114 25.908 3.0GM 29.795 29.m7 S"09 I

23 30.947

.4.54 36.179 34.873 S0" 5

1 23 51.6S1 7.742 59.931 4*.460 1.113 82 1.30 13.151 320 58.921 I

412.450 404 8.103 99 471I311

• 404 8.103 99 549.471 D0.abd WoO P100d,.

lb.1..1 P b ltso lb1.12 NSSS Deemnlo.lbo Fb0 lb 1.1 RhOWN ls lb.1.1.4 R..

"g b.dp lb.1.1.5 CRD hos~oANPa l10.1.16 beon honooowl.W lb. I.1.r R..

Pr hm lb 1.1.7 Rone pbo 1b.1.1 s FsFVdllr cb lb.1.1.10 SR..fOod lb.1.011 R

do lbI. 1.11 Iobs r

lblll R

e lb.1.15 e

1 u

lb 1.1 ToN lb 12 Dsob NSSS 1b.1 Su~wdPbdod1b Ad~rt Cof Plbad lb AMoi-f Co.b lb21 SP1R Fo Po d Wota4 n lb 21 1Re Cbct.,

01 no.

Ib21.1 ToDffdLb-id RCRA W n

d I b.2,4 D*

nA of PC9 Sd4 RCRA Watt (nobI.M b.125 D2 oos 1of0L0ad lb.2.8 AbWM Ra~

1b12 S004d Pnrbd lb OAIM Cos.

Podod lb Cohatn Cost.

lb.3.1 SD o.P-4 1b.3 2 DOC stffeoo n

0 W

lb.3.3 Pes h

f W

lb.3.4 S-b d

lb.3 S P"

so0 Rldl dole' lb.3 8 SpaM Fu.l CxM &W Tn0 lb.3 S4dil P.4 lb C6dnd Ccttn P. hd lb Pebd-DbeW4 Ct lb.4-1 Dsomn rW lb. 32 DO 16.so*o npnn lb.S3 Pn.10t U4os lb,.4 0.oI'd p

lb.4.I Onool 54DW10.

19.46 Obe.0oDAW00000 30 53 406 387 71 11 a

300 4"

.34t 34t 101 10 116 29

?S l1 as as 73 11 6

.86 150 22 172 172 272 41 313 313 90 13 103 52 90 13 103 103

• a.

s 75 11 9

43 312 47 359 359 S10 22 172 172 204 31 235 212 204 31 235 212 2.527 379 2.906 2.t36 312 637 937 2.527

_ 691 3.843 3.573 41 4.733 1.000

.7 -

1.350 1,000 1A00 2.000 3.630 52 1.200

'125 43 1.0(00 4.167 2.000 24 2.730 24 2730 270 33.740 1.087 625 270 1.067 33.740 9.791 9.791 629 70 127 957 698 1.083.

19

l:

470 146

".11 1.217 9332 9.332 3.152 9e 4.098 4.098 9

029

• 1 616 619 06 1.S20 252 1.930 1.930 2

44 7

93 03 1

43 716 2.633 13M1N 13.1S4 1

113 2.192 716 11247 5.135 20.216 29.216 94 723 m

1.097 164 121 1.261 247 327 2.38 707 3.74 3.754 19 146 146

.143 1,100

.00 5 221

'783 8.00t 287 327 2 2384 6.317 1.911 12.987 6.984 24 24 879 M

967 967 1.045 10M 1.150 110 143 713 713 22 la 168 3

1 13 4

19 19 2.019 11S.076 27.000 1.620.0m0 31 22.080 19.193 249.915 150230 29.050 1.193 2.006.71 150230 6.506 6.504 3.63 5n3208 170 3.i39 593206 170 221 4.439

1. 4 7w Sen.hw, foe.

OIow t,,rb Nuefrr -sratig.SI.tHoo Vh ---

lsio*.l.gCootAnetd.

DMaw-t E&I F14St.40 R-. 0 App-dia ~C Pogo etlo5 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (TIhousands of 2003 Dollars) 09-0.

ULRW NRC Spo,4Fo-Sd4 P.00.4 vbW..oh eB." I U54Y0.d o0.

R..

Pbging Tnn p0 t P cso Obopoasal Off, ToNl To4t U.. T.

U.

ngo-M Rotont Vok C.. A Cboas 9 CI.S C CTCC

-oood Coot Conbcl Coot Coot Coht.

Cooft Cooto Coot.

Cools Colty c-ot Coot coot.

costs C. Foo Co. Foo Ca Foo C. Frot C. Fo Wot Lb..

Monot Moboo l

..e Aa41ey DrlrAbn Pod40 lb Po404-o.too Coet rn c

• b4

• t.r PotA bodgo lb.4.8 NRC root lb.4 E

n..g-y P.-4ng Foon lb4.10 StoO&UColl lb4.tI Set Foot Pod OAt lb 4.n IsS2 O opototog Cools 1b.4.13 s-ast lollcos lb.4.14 DOC 50 Cost 1b.4.15 UMy Sadl cood lb.4 SvAoto Pad. lb P04odrDepw.04. Cot lb 0 TOTAL PERIOO lb COST P0ERM1I TOTALS PERIOD 2.Lane C.,*-.4 Roal P~od 2. Dn.d Ousoobto&g Adctt Nu.4w Sto S.rf SoMM R 28.1.1.1 R 4.404. Pvo a Wono 2.1.1.2 CROk% & No Rowal 28.1.1.3 Reoa"VeadW 2s..14 R.""Vo"o 2..1.1 Tot.

RnAM of M0Jr Epr<-4 2.12 Mo, T.vbk1Gio.t 2s 1.3 Mob. Codn DMt dof Pk" Sylft D

rVte Syo-C oVt-2..1.4 TotL.

Reloo0 B."fr St.%- C a_

2. 1.5.1 RCIIRC3 21.1.5.2 RCA 2a.1.5.3 RCS 2..1.34 RCO 2-.1.8.8 RCA 28.1.56 RCJ 2a.1.5.7 RCV 28.1.5.8 RCY 2&.1.5.9 RCS 28.1.5.10 RCT 2.1.5 Totl.

Now R e B.d" Soo C..po 20.1 :.1 7E9 2:.1..2 N20 2W1A.1 N2P 28.164 N3A 2a.1.6.5 N430 28.1.06 o

431 20.1687 04304 20.1.68. N3P 28.1 8.6.

30 19 716 1.342 11.591 1.342 12.100

.317 155

.1 27 491 491 3.420 7,423 2

I Is 14.467 270 440 2.192 3113 34.578 27s 41 2.192 MM13 46229 48 364 364 19 207 207 5

6 19 146 146 74 064 5

41 74 004 064 513 3.433 3,s33 1.013 8.a36 6.S36 2.230 17.404 11.792 9.973 631499 6.64 17,7S 123.431 103.024 so 064 41 062 19.817 270 29.010 14.414 2.6319 010 29.80s 14.616 3.639 36 87 140 124 1

2.077 el 4.Y14 363 6.943 33 33 143 44 4.643 859 1.2sf 47 5.910 1.411 42 76S

• 419 7.00 162 s.8N2 182 42 15.574 364 267 3

161 S.M 426 804 330 100 3.120 201 l3 33 52 271 2

Ss 83 186 as 42 644 I

0 I

1 6

33 I

I 30 27 7

9 250 129 2

2 Q2 63 1

1 36 20 3

3 80 43 5

5 122 101 S

3 28 109 I

1 25 27 28 2

651 646 246 1.244 1.244 230 I.14o 1.140 6.724 21.911 2.911 7.424 20.933 20,930 14.024 41.329 49.329 1.004 7.415 T.415 7T4 6413 5.413 1

5 5

14 t4 94 24 736 138 141 SIT el?

39 n21 n2l 26 146 146 4

S07 80T 51 610 010 61 322 322 21 116 lie 4TT 2.874 8674 9s 407 407 3

17 17 10 63 63 23 124

- _24 24 137 137 4

21 21 29 15S 106 9

49 49 5

26 26 107 1.053 1,127

.378 62 0.800 2204 107 18,109 3,931 63 M

153

~34'.699 I2 14 0

77 190 74 so 3 3212 3M6 761 190

. 469 76 MYT 250 1.310 304 342 479 306 s0 M.090 1.06 219 272 324 6

2 483 419 42 4 19 7

288 8

lie 18 S

_I sT 67 7

4.433 04 106.214 2.64.316 151.921 211.99 2.612.419 151.621 74182 2 27.190 2.934 1172.990 0.0039 312.379 2-3.434 1.149 1.401.086 21.434 1.149 2.053.461 59.315 2299 2.670.672 5.691

• 196.788 17,136 01 73 12.070 2.432 1,169 16.13 6.024 47.021 1.159 2.?B

.22

.ga

.IA

• 975 1.223 8

02.50 1.7

• 966 1.499

,39

19.

923 201.0o 3 18.067 33.090 4.228 2.0O6 202 3"50 459 17.032 1.104 20.60 I.409 1.409 294 14T964 I.700 7.076 426

.1330 29 77 123 3

2 o

0 1

!52 1

1 13 0

76 1

. 1 19 0

0 13 0

0 17 90 3

2 26 3

19 27 34 14 2

2 23 27 10 10 2

T7,.S2 Smrlm Me.

Ord tr Crk Nutetror Co-.fiog Stof..

Pt)os.fodf.d.fo Co.t A..o.

Do...o.,IE

-tJ.U Rr. 0 AppoofLtr C, Pogo 5 f 1s Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thouslsnds of 2003 Dollars)

Vll4.t LLRW bRC Spool F.l P000--.d

0.

O..o VolkSo 81 U6&.y *nd Ae.t" Doeon It-*I P0680lo T.-po."

Pnlo Dlnpool Ottw Total ToWl lU. k.T M....

Plootto.

Vtomn Cls.A ClssB CI... C CTCC Po d

Cntl Conrost.

Wels Asll 0D.-b Cool Coot Co-t.

Cot.

Coot.

Cost C

Costs Coos Cot.

cot.

C..t.

Cost C.u Fot C.Foot C. F.M C. Foot CF.

oo VtLb.

Mont..h.

Nk..

N-R lnt. 6Bs* Sym C o

noot (otkoM 2.1.6.10 N3R 2:. 6.1l N3S 2*.1.6.12 N3T 28.1.6.13 N3U 2.1.6.14 NVW 2.1.6.15 N3Y 20.1 8.1o N51 2&.1.6.17 N52 28.1J.5.1 N53 28.1 6.19 NS4 2a..6o20 NS5 2&1.621 N5o 28.1.622 NSA 2.1.623 N5i 2.I.6.24 NSC 2&1.525 NSO 2..1.6.26 NSE 2a.1.627 NSF 28.1.6.25 NS5 2a.1.52 NS" 2.1.6.30 NSI 2&1.6.31 NSJ

2. 16.32 NSIC 20.1 8.33 NSN 2.1.6.34 NSO 24.1 6.35 NSP 2.1.6 38 NSO 22.1.6.37 NSS 28.1638 NST 20.1.4.39 NSU 20.1 6.40 NSY 28.1 6.41 NSZ 2*.1.842 PPA 24.1.6 Tot*la 01d R8.

0 &b4.5:S Syst. Ccaroeat 21.1.7.1 75A 28.1.7.2 7DA 2.1.7.3 7FA 28.1.7.4 PBA 28.1.7.5 P[A

2..7.6 PMA 2.1.7.7 PRA 28.1.7.8 PTI I PTP 2.1.7 Tbst Trot. B S5649 SYnto C eVo."

20.t61 7CA 28.1. 2 Ti2 28.1.8.3 To23 28.1. 4 T893 28.1.65 TC2 201.6.6 TE2 28.1.6.7 TEE 2o.I.6 8 TE5 2a.18 9 TP2 28.1.8.10 TP3 281 6.11 TPE 28.1 a

Toto, 13 19 12 162 16 32 11 28 18 47 4

13 Se 8 4 27 33 20 31 14 22 14 21 0

1 5

7 13 9

12 22 56 22 21 so 48 S8 44

1. 6 11 28 II 28 06 290 1.616 63 37 1

1I 79 118 a

41 10 65 10 as 360 0

0 5

6 0

0 13 3

0 0

3 3

5 3

25 157 a

3 27 171 7

7 179 142 0

I 17 4

1 0

6 1I I

I 12 32 0

0 2

I 27 13 2

2 32 43 I

I 16 15 0

1 23 4

0 0

4 10 1

0 6

13 0

0 4

10 1

0 4

18 0

2 3

0 6

0 0

2 4

0 0

8 6

0 0

3 0

0 10 3

I 2

47 16

¶ 1

10 23 1

10 22 3

5 163 31 2

1 39 29 2

I

39.

29 0

0 10 9

O 0

10 9

I I

35 18 48 39 946 1.09O I

1 26 27 2

1 5

32 1

1 12 18 I 3 44 135 I

I 22 16 0

0 3

4 1

2 62 15 2

0 II 8

179 257 6

30 30 6

46 46 4

23 23 6s 340 340 70 384 384 104 6D1 So1 20

• 0 90 17 80 s0 30 139 138 8

38 38 22 120 120 38 207

.?20 29 124 124 22 130 100 7

34 34 10 02 52 7

31 38 10 52 52 4

20

.20 4

1a 18 8

35 35 5

26 25 4

24 24 8

43 43 29 146 146 I's4 48, 13 6?

8?

44 207 237 51 224 224 51 225 22S 16 70 75 16 7T 73

_ 25 41 14 1 911 4.9e2 4.962 82 6

18 1S8 10 42 8

333 520 2.216 432 213 14 144

'll 27 2

339 40 S

491 129 224 s8 294 13 49 29 70 40 49 31 1

4 23 9

1 17 29 13 W9 17 5 6 10 125 I5 579 49 121 Jo0 121 9*

2.012 94 482 111 483 112 124 29 124 29 11.707 3.3s0 4.115 293 7n7 439 2.442 273

• 59.09 1.899 128.17 3,593 9.638

1. 080 7.402 867 14.43

1. 416 3.434 34 7217 1.269 31135 1.732 13.435 1.390

,1 88 1.091

4.

30 6.594 482 4.765 315 6.3 08 487 1.4 242 1.578 193 2228 44 5.47 211

.3.12

• 291 6698 494 27.716 1.241

• 300 4

10 904 479 90.095 1.128 27=22 230 27.32 2.245 7.3618 a0g

2. 3.770 1.291 760.01 42.01 2.22 1.413 16.148 813 10917 407 5.387

• .106 5*.813 l098 2.27T 21 3.144 1.457 120 232 109.56 9824 1 0 198.0 4.401 498.344 1.321 1734 as 0.297 229 2,083 118 27.18S 144.

2. 60 14.697 0.622

0. 898 383 10.812 2.957 51.772 1.962 4 dll 1.733 3 3.204.338 697,?

l6 214 9

5 94 230 731 25 26 72t 500 4

3 0

'I 0

0 a

a 1.210 12 106 2.4S 3.097

• 131 6

242 94 232 s

9 307 94 Is 0

0 7

8 132 0

6 169 06 87 5

3 a4 Io 77 0

2 3

106 1ie 2.944 162 lag 4.071 4.29n 27 140 149 23 II8 116 11 61 SI Io 492 492 22 112 112 4

20 20 30 175 175 3

18 le 229 I.139 139 424 2.432 2.42

.2 8

I 6

31 31 1.471 8.410 8.450 92 062 062 4

752 732 6

42 42 84 451 491 57 305 305 02 275 275 2.304 14.205 14.290

• 317 62 148 05

~277 4 32 11 76 10 28 1

2.144 685 163 691 8.921 l,525 40 1

79s 2

.30.249 9.311 3.000 293 t.7s4 160 9

25 2.62 28 948 404 408 373 30.378 13.098 rL So.ie. le.

Ooafrr Cn..k Ntt fr., t7.t..tttin. St. H,.,

Ntoa.1.A..*I,.g Cod AtAolyd.

Dor-tt tr&t4sS4M)6 Rn,. 0 ppdL, P.t. otfIS Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

I ~-

0on0.5.

81R.W NRC Sp.n FI

.S o

Pro.....t 8.-v. 0V 8.0.i W5.=

D-I.

Rt..M P.6. 9 ig T,..n.p.0 bslg Dspoad Oth0w Ttl T7..l Uc.T.

o 8to.80 Vk Cu A

Cl-B Cl...C 6CC P

od C."4 Co-CoI Ct C.t CMt.

Co PI= C.t.

C.t Ct.at Co.45,M..ne

CotC, Cttt C.

Cots C. F4 C.. FM C. F_..

C F_..

C. FPt Wl. Lb0 W.na.n UWonlt I I

dl At?

0*f D

v riptr-

-t Asgoto O Sywt-Coto..

2.h1 To04*

M eI-4at Symtn C.opor..t 2.1.10 TOWS?,

28.1.11 S

t.ffo4g

h. tq.l adwo. t l6.b 281 SR666.i Ptt d 2h A.ty Ct..?

P.4d 2* AddW-d Cft, h2U1 Cw* S t.dwo (Eo40 RPf) 2*2 5.14t,?I P.44d 2a Add d Cttt Pedod 2* Coa6to Cotas 2tt 31 Po tM _b.tt 2.312 S4? 5t 2h. 3 SO.? pFnr CVI0.1 ttn? Tr.

2t.3 S

t,? P4wW 2. Coftwo COwn Pefttt 2* P5tdt.P.t4 C060 2.4.1 os o*?pin 2.42 kt it 2.4 3 Pm"l tboo 2h 4 H4AlIh pIyt I et

2. 4 5 M.."45 tqttt 1tn1r 2*4t Dls.

of OAW e W..ootd 2 4 7 P-4 tt_

bt.l 2h4 t NRC F.*

28.4.9 E-qefy P b.*rg Ft 284.10 St OSU Co,?

2h.4.11 St.

F-. Poo4 O&U 2&.4.12 ISFSiOper04th0 Ct, 2.4.13 S*4Y StI4ff C.

2 4.14 DOC Sff Cosl 2*4. 15 UWa Staff Cod 2* 4 Slblotti 5.442. Pbd-D*ttda Cosa, 2..0 TOTAL PERIOD 2* COST PERIOD 21tSlt D..SRt..hI P.4dod 21 D1,0 0 0*.6 AtWi.

Ditp.Iofs Pbr4 Sys*o IOot4 Syft1 Ctnhat 2b.111 I. MAC 2b.1.12 ISA 2b.1.1.3 ICA 2tt1 1 4 BEA 2b.1.1. 5 RCs 2b.1.1 Tot04.

66*

10 3

ss 17 la?

061 61 a59 14.37 7,03 1*195 14.124 22.500 344 20.77*

82.018 Blo1s

,os07 es 53.46*

14.705 164.418 40.134 3,831

• 31 11.064.290 235i2ss 2.29

.250 s

• 8.20 2.063 10.313 10.313 2.083 10.313 10.313 ISO 62 170 0n1 321 1.574 1.574 171 26 1*

177 12.;5 n

.913 14.669 14 110 171 82 170 12as 50 2260 '

18,439 1.71 14 48 12 60 60 1.40 104 1.144 1.14 I

,1,.23*

124 1.361 1.225 9* 6 247 1.233 1.233 1.930 290 2.220 2220 S 5e 12 269 75 411 41f n7 115 846

• 46 37 54 001 591

.23 12 1S7

• n 3 4

354 356 1,195 190 1.379 13 151

-1.48 224 1.721 1.721 9

963 1.497 1.480 11.400 18.136 to20 20.esa 20.856 4*

2*1 s

ss 12 209 34.8*6 s.706 43.899 4Z141 1.007 17.454 7201 2.007 14.124 31,920 4,o00s 30.807 152.664 13223 16 1.4*53 200.f74 215 0

,as

'.We 20 1.453 200,574 21s 137.

l 1.04 10263

-2*217

.617 ISO 4.ss4 93,670 1.100 020.406

.286 136 164.41*

44,81*

5.0*4 631 11.360.730 236.865 531.704

• 4.134 4.620

-70s.iu T.

42 600

.7604*

3*11 1

10 1.052 1

.2 8.44 540 404 5

06.11 1.224 373 34 1.8223 1.107 6.541 8.174

.351 19.740 277 265 74 33 334 2.004 73 130 7

4 30 218 1os 218 13 7

89 350 62 4

3 40 130 49 I

1 30 11 400 712 04 47 520 2.71 760 3.56 3.706 130 007 007 211 004 994 04 28*

29 20 112 112 1,183 6.746

.746 no. serofeF. Ioe.

Q*fr,'R Creek X-1-..O..wl~

I~..

Cofi~e~ttCs A,..1y.1s D-w.e.Wg E161455-06R... 0 Appj-dL. C N.C7.fIS Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (TIMousards of 2003 Dollars) i LoRW NRC Sp6.e Fl S5 Pe.d 8....IVob"_

Rendi Ut1'17 n4d Ae" Deo R.e...

PsheAgleg Trnnpot Pfesen~g DIpod Oth Tel Tebl L&Tm Me.e-.e Rtot.e.

Vob CL. A CLN-e C

TCC P csed -CI Conh dv fed..

Adh.*v oDm fe.l Cod C4 C-fl Cove Coete Coaes Cost C1.tI

-Y Coet C.t C

Coth Coh C. r._

C..

O Ct C

Ced CF."

C-. F..t Zlm. be.

e.,he Mh...s.

Reedes &4.SW g Syslt-C.eeea 2b.12.1 RBI 2b.122 R8R 2b.1.2.3 RBC 2b 1224 RSE 2b1.2.5 RR 2b.1.2 8 R80 2b.127 RCS0 2b.12 8 CROs 2b.12.9 RC7 2b11210 RD8 2b.12.11 RD' 2M.1.2.12 REC 2b.1+/- 13 REF 2b.1214 RECHJ 2b.12.15 RIEL 2b.12 18 REII 2b12.1T REO 2b.12.18 RFQ 2b.12.19 RER 2b.1220 RET 2b.12.21 REW 2b.1222 REX 2b.12.Z RE 21.11.23 CCVIY 2b.1.2.24 CR09 2b.12.25 RFC 2b.1228 RFF 2b.1.2.27 RFH 2b.1.2.2 RFJ 2b.1229 RFL 2b.1.2 O RFC 2b.1.2.31 RFO 2b.12.32 RGC 2b.12.93 RGO 2b.12.04 RCI 2b012.35 RGL 2b.12.36 RGP 2b.1.2.37 RGR 2b.12.38 RGU 212.139 RC2 2b.1.2 Tftel Nw Rldweele wdI Syst-w Covwt 2b.1.3 1 N38 2b.1.3.2 N48 2b.1.8.3 N4A 2b.1.3 4 N4A9 2b.1.38 3

N4 2b.1.38 N4E 2b.1.37 N4F 2b.13 8 NAN 2b.1.3.9 N4K 2b.1.810 NIL 2b.1.3.11 NSR 2b.1.3.12 N5V 2b.1.3.13 NSW Zb.1.3.14 N6X 2b 1.3 Totals 83 102 400 187 In 62 9

163 42 9,

127 19

• 3 13 35 21 24 26 124 27 so ST 116 100 a s 123 69 40 48 22 146 83 32 68 3.871 4

16 102 191 2

00 0

25 0

3 166 6

162 82 3

8M 41 3

87 8

3 as 48 3

36 151 20 784 207 8

105 293 3

102 14 2

64 52 10 101 643 1

00 04 4

127 65 3

34 213 3

8T 42 7

184 169 1

36 17 4

62 21t 3

63 t4 1

6 47 0

12 10 0

10 3

0 12 3

0 9

14 4

100 00 2

15 9n 2

59 33 4

31 226 31 221 2

57 9

3 76 30 2

83 29 2

4T 18 22 43*

787 1

31 S

1 38 14 1

16 3

4 103 60 1

38 12 1

36 18 149 3.518 4.186 U4 409 44 257 48 282 U4 308 6e 36 287 1.760 143 796 43 256 39 223 109 1.040 Is 81 n

39 79 403 48 27 112 643 20 117 89 478 77 418 33 151 20 91 8

43 9

48 12 81 61 312 80 261 39 222 82 477 86 449 27 180 41 240 48 235

_28 let 317 1.782 16 93 21 122 9

53 68 383 25 141 18 t00 2.580 14.311 63 349 27 151 18 By 16 7T 30 159 2

8 8

34 9

51 8

45 10 59 30 193 86 246 2

10 ss 264 337 1.720 489 207 Z20 366 358

1. T6 7Ts 256 223 1.040 51 439 413 27 643 117 479 101

-16 43 48

1. 2 291 222 477 449 180~

240 260 181 1RTs2 122 03 363 141 l00 14.31 349 101 87 77 108 4

11 183 24 16 246 1720 0O9 248 1.062 124 1.203 143 10.94 148 41 40 47 9.702 T72 1.923 890 1.258 43 n77 159 1.200 1.823

. 1

. *3 lea10 42 1.571 194 422 829 1.07 120 2.291 509.

439 0

7 60852 774 422 S4 140 147 32 129 S

0T4 9

• 107 43 1.205 187 728 180 304 seo 3* 6 664 702 27 9

642 90 m7 83 ao*08 45 5.32 2.364 Y3 14

• 474 42 221 10

.1276 1802 473 37 12 44I 00

• 4 3.02 1S 2.6011 0.09S 199

• 406 63 106 84 86 74 210 127 1

24 lo?*18 29 129 26 130 22 9h87 30 29 22?

9 0

Ts7 0

4,412 942 2103,69 3.36n 6.4 0.839 5 07.502 2 436 06.701 2.106 483.23 9.083 1 106.330 M.263 84.969 2.062 48.428 1.315 224.172 1.820 01.209 784 81234

.619 74.427 1.M 54.981 2i18 130.330 S.641 22.330 980 0.134 2.104 69829 2.864 16.399 1.2

. 8.62 1.102 6029 X49 6.807 539 8.182 06 67.524 2.Tr0 32.983 Z317 3 8.452 10.40 76.609 zs0s 9.89 1.47 48.329 1.968 39.045 2.762 27.005 1.44 429.693 4.486 16.900 915 22.967 1.4 9.741 495 s 60OS4 2243 22.555 1.4, 22.807 707 2.89s.020 63.762 580.09 2.922 22.130 1.492 10.100 683 8.702 as0 19.928 1.480 710 120 4.239 324 M1016 302 7.389 400 7.42 097

• 207 I.363 29.107 2.234 404 189 4.4o 2.763 26.431 10580 133 00 23 a

22 sT 87 t8 10 28 el 46 06 4*

7 09 69 123 0a6 4

3 8

66 I

1 33 21 IO I

2 1

o 8

20 2

1 17 42 I

I 8

8 S

6 I

1 15 10 0

0 0

8 15 1

0 0

11 T

1 2

7T 10 3I2 06 s

2 64 8

19 14 307 2s7 3712 S..s e Is..

O 0t-afr CtwA Junal.oa.

oi.

5tntSbus lhtaovaniadt, Cal A.s.y-ni Donaan. Et!b143510OI R". 0 Appn di. Ca P.R.

o° 1t Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands o0 2003 Dollars)

• o~d 040 Stl 95ttl 0

ICCSIMV~bn9001104 n

I._..

I

=

Dana Rtaa Panalg TYsnnpot Pnlne Dnpanal Oh.

Totl Tobl Uc.T M.g..tn Reto.nlon Vaoa Cla. A Class 9 Clss C CTCC P0nsed C."

C cao clnC Cnt.

cfnt C

Cat Ca Cont.

Cntnnn Cant.

CoCt.

Ca.

clet C. F C. rF_

Co. r4 C. Faa C-Fn r OAh.

Ulan Mranhu I

tne"-

zonnb unsenpilon Old R86.". 6U S Syltn Cenbpft 2b.1.4.1 OR55 PM D&D Danbdge nd De"n 2b.1.42 PRO 2b.1.4.3 PS8 2b.1.4.4 PTA 2.l.4.S PUA 2b.148 PUU 2b.14.7 PVA 2h.IA.o UA9 2b.149 UAS 2b.1.4 Totak Tw66a RSn Synta.. Coroaa 211l.5.1 T02 2ho1l52 TF2 2b.1.33 TFG 2b.1..4 TG2 2b. 1.5 aTIIA 2hlI 5.7 TL2 2b.1.5 8 TUA 2b.1.5 9 TN2 2b.1.5.10 T02 2b.1.5.11 TOA 2b.1.5.12 TOCR 2h.1.5.13 TOR 2hl.5.14 TOV 2b.1.5.15 TOWN 2b.1.5.18 TOXITOY 2b.1.5.17 TS2 2b.1.5.18 TTA 2h.1.5.19 TU2 2b.1.5 Tnt.'.

AelanInd Olfn Sys5t. Cw at9 2b.1.81 Aye 2b.1 6.2 AYA 2b.1.o.8 AY9 2b.1.6.4 AYC 2b.1.85 AYE 2b.1.88 AZ8 2b.1.6.7 AZA 2b.18 8 AZC 2b.1 6.9 A2M 2b.1.6.10 AZE 21 6.11 AZF 2l 6.12 AZI 2hI.6 T0tam MA.aan Syenrn C.n.t 2b.1.7.1 9AA 2b.1.72 6BA 2b.1.7.3 BDA 2b.1.7.4 CAA 2b.1.7.5 DAA 2b.1.7.6 DAC 2b.1.7.7 DG8 2b.1.7.8 DOT 2b.1.7.9 OPH 2b.1.7.10 DWF 140 12 107 30 159 112 6

240 165 992 0

5 2

3 I

I 4

3 0

4 3

5 3

S 19 22 49 1

1 251 17 22 20 0

0 186 13 17 351 20 IT is 0

0 7n 3

2 47 2

2 244 9

10 136 68 1

2 49 2

4 49 2

2

• 1 0

O "a

3 8

22 0

0 154 9

9 46 2

2 145 3

5 2.000 as 1.0 12 1

7n 42 22 16 70 90 118 el I

0 174 37 l72 25 943 292 It 25 650 271 II 3

• 81 271 390 520 4

5 29 67 56 32 263 250 74 la 129 17 58 36 7

I 190 36 9

3 210 198 5S 36 148 46 2.791 1.7M 24 1R O

1 49 290 15 85 74 399 67 395 2

96 556 74 444 4*7 2.374 21 112 223 1.4a o

42 190 1.19 281 1.579 6

30 40 216 29 170 153 990 20 157 33 1"

37 22 30 177 27 60 380 8

42 123 710 30 171 71 416 1J376 S.143 18" 1

260 89 399 365 556 444 2.74 112 1.443 42 1.159 1.07 30 216 170 Rao 160 227 177 27 300 42 710 171 416 7.09 143 S

950 127 276 48

• 600 270 1.441 331 12 0

Z148 131 2.126 915 7.9 100S 241 77 8.047 814 134 S

.957 914

• 24627 1.564 4 7 14 358 200

• 690 1

3.260 B06 15S

• 5*

917 49 1.590 S1 717 109 90 4

• 2.346 157 108 9

-754

-594 675 114 5T 1

1.829 137 107 34.531 S.384

• 3.197

..'18 274 s49.52 Z398

15. 552 687 59,I37 3.521 80.278 2.500 522 148 97.159 5.M 93,177 3,B19 z401.8 21.567 18,631 977 399.789 0.550

• 8.191 457 314.99 S"

205 36.18 7.838 3.147 349

32. 660 1.648 37,402 1.034 166.391 5.426

41. 6 3.169 41.699 1.496

• 9.191 1.060 s3.865 1.098 4.016 295 104.864 1.894 S.146 458 163. 051 3.389 37.651 1.042 6.451 3.237 1.oM4.160 as22 109 4

3 24 1

1 22 1

1 S7 1

2 20 0

0 43 1

1 10 0

60 2

3 14 0

0 13 0

0 12 0

0 24 0

1 429 11 13 199 5

7 72 3

5 34 10 16 so0 I

I 1?

2 3

56 10 15 16 M4 93 31 21 17 10 73 19 4

10 40 20 2

3 84 17 3

6 3

5 5

4 26 4

372 213 191 91 Ia 24 2

1 22 17 a8 23 64 329 16 9n 1

60 30 183 8

42 22 128 3

1I 37 223 5

29 5

27 5

27 219 1209 359 9s 60 183 42 126 18 m

29 27 27 66 1256 1.044 280 364 64 208 30 M99 63 43 31 492 60 24 9

1.046 51 s0 18 9

16 322 11 4 807 ea 67.503 2.447 21,3N 926 11.152 493 41.612 1.279 4.526 427 2.0 949

1. 731 218 47.000 1.762 3.242 307 3 029 294

• 3,610 267

14. 041 541 244.484

9. 530 120,744 4.319 69 359 1.599 1,112 190 32001 8 1, s 15.7 1.43 5 5602 2 64s

• 223 1.501 3s9 102 s91 591 sO 319 319 3

14 14 200 1292

-1292 20 112 112 49 282 282 a

65 2

12 10 77 2

18 685 12 77 is1 2.367 277 Z039 73 21 3

7.381 265 277 51 1,094 69

?W SAnnle Ian.

0esfr, C,-. NorItnr

s.

-11tr.

Staf.,,

Dnn -iofonIN Cost An..vi.

Dt

1. Flid E145115. R.

tJ Appt-dn C, nPoe 9 ots Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands cr2003 Dollars) 09...

LLRW NRC Spol ntsF S..

Po-.d a...I V.kv 5-l UOIsy sd Acthhy D.

-- a9 Trn P'ln9g eopos Noe.ss, Dtsw 0..

Te.l Toebl LIs RIsts.e V.ts Cl.sA Ctsss6 Cb.. C CTCC P

- d Cft C

o 0,4..

9 o

Cost Cesd Cost Coot.

Cos.

Cost.

CostS Ceonls Cots Co.

C"sTs Costs C. F."

C.. Frt Ce--.

Cs. F C.F.

WLb.

Lho, Mon hw.

S ONm.

Cnn..

fl C.(ca)..

-t css Cst c"q-Y Cf ot 2b.1.7.11 FWP 2M.1.7.12 INTAKE STRUCTURE 2b.1.7.18 MA1 20.1.7.14 LIA 2b.1. r.

MeS MTr 2b..7R1S MS 2b.1.7.17 NM9 ROOF 20.1.7.19 es 2.1.7.19 POT' 2b.1.720 RSF ROOF 2b.1.721 UYARC 2b.1.7.22 wAA 2h.1.723 WVS 2b.1. 724 YARD AREAS 2h.1.728 YDAIYFAIYLA 20.1.7 Tots 2b.1.8 S-%"g hI of fodd

_cw o.

D

~

Rdnt B."

SY.

ol SMs 6

• 2h.1.9.1 No wRadoas 609..71.

Ro-sJe T4 2b.1.92 ON Rogvos &A6.

. Syfh-s R.oj 2b.1.98 Resets Bottr. Svsd R.s.

2b.1.94 Tbrn SBt

. Sysem Rw ael 2b.1.9.5 AVo&d O~R GOF. Dson 2b.1.9.6. Dt.t

.D.

2b.19 7 D0o.4.LhUs. Rss.

2b.1.s5 LLRW aSlo

• DetC-2b.19 9

Mlascol B did

.D t

2b.1.9.10 Nes R "d-s g.Doem 2b.1.9.11 Old Rad"eslo &Ad.WV.0D s 2b.1.9.12 RBooog R.s.s..s 2b.1913 Rsets, B g.191.DOC00 2b.1.9.14 R.50 B5 V 239.0D 2b.1.9.15 ReSbr PS".51f.

D-2b.1.9 16 R.....

s.O

75. Doe.

20.1.9.17 R""" B."

919. DeCn 2h.1.9.18 Stad httol T vb Ro

& Ds 2b.1.9.19 T.b0 40.g 0. Do.o.

2b.1.920 Tvbok 9Pg V23tI*

D 2b.1.9.21 T70b0.,dg 499. Dso 2b.1.922 Cos..0t.d Sot 2b.1.9 Tolb 20.1 54t P4d 2b Ad"ey Costs P.ndod 2b Colatetsl Cost.

2b.3.1 Pts "id -

2b2 p-3.2d 01 - 9i0onl do5o deo Sn 2b.3 3 Sr0od u h

20.3.4 SPs.4 Fool CWe~RA nrd TM.

2b.3 S.lA4, P.cd 2b Coftoid Costs P.nd2b P~

..d Costs 204.1 D

, 6w""

2b042 ls-2b.4.3 Pnrty boo 20.4*

HosS 1 4 ww t*femal 204 llossyewlp renl r~t 90 142 9e 35 28 2?

13 20 21 1.324 113 13 243 3.365 2

3 317 28 111 3

94 1.620 947 16 626 2

428 700 2.184 1.085 05 232 n3 139 37 1s0 12

1. 3 27 109 119 320 104 447 73 35 49 177 78 4.444 6.431 3

3 62 7?

1 1

23 21 0

0 S

8 0

0 13 1

1i 14 243 322 3

3 71 54 I

0 44 U

1.605 712 13 4

116 2t 37 24 1

382 4

3 1

41 6

4 6.

90 57 919 11 7

4 111 131 120 2.174 30 s0 1.787 1S4 7

4*

7 6

4 96 42 27

19.

428 172 110 12 1.754 4s 75 2.649 22m 19 19 196 1"1 14 9

140 19 10 115 5

3 52 II 7

112 26 17 268 41 28 92 413 31 22 90 314

1.

12 1a9 1.039 663

10. 20 1.801 1.26 4.819 19.232 14 100 21 163 S?

320 320 1I 98 98 9

47 47 4

31 2

10 32 241 5

39 a

44 44 467 2.486 2.486

1. 2 296 295 2

1I 36 279 1

4 4

1.181 6.962 S.909 234 1 22 1226 12?

969 e6e

¶2 of o1 19 96 96 327 1.710 1.710 72 344 344 913 4.186 4.196 1.398 5.966 5.96N 41 196 196 41 199 19I 2S0 1927 1.27n 649 S3396 3.396 1.833 8.099 8.099 1I0 814 914 69 420 420 9S 4?7 467 34 1SO 100 71 338 339 221 1.011 1.011 2"9 1.415 1.415 219 1.083 1.093 117 558 558 2.897 19.275 19.270 9.7231 47,72?

47,72?

17228 9.487 88.252 S9 2.793 2.7

- S3 403 403 3.464 26.704 4.075 29.904 3&196 104 IN 1.013 231 290 53 71 19 31 249 39

1.

4 4250 1.177 V*

67 162 19 2m 2

16 1

1.65 19.915 2.424 1.321 82 6

3.819 8

649 9144

• 9 9s.1 As I

5 05 13793 22.108 001 54 616 235 4249

• 12 17.532 324 891 2.052 1.747 1.400 1.92 0522 523 1,11802 M

29.73 1.144

• .095 1,109 3.109 1.888 106.202 59.802.

17tM69 1.2U4 192.399 209.139 2.013 3.208 61.938 2185 17.638 792

• .5 939

1. 54

• .916 7.138 462 299.386 21.772 50.170 Z496

.300 390 5.499 791 3

99.996 87.610 96.838 20.881 382.164 2.127 40.794

.8 U4.800 97 129.390 6.061 112.336 2.691 1.301.33T 10.409 951.929 93,718 665.90 1.486 as.s58 1.490 434.114 9.354 1.709.162 10.764 1.4 10 755 67.92S 255.51s 5.584 140.034 3.239 5.192 3.593 2272 12U64 111.534 2.902 267.7J5 9.417

• 54.no9

• 0.tl8 353.651 7.997 199.626 4.291 10.619.990 6.020 20.109.100 229.646 27,855,150 904.142 5.094 19.22 2.2S8

.672 14n752 29.4,9 19 182 2#

1.690

lo 250 2

118 250 182 23 1990 23224 29.79 2J57T 15.275 21 1 I

29 0

1 2.677 415.304 211 9289 2.13S 4.326 321 1.607 1.60T 2.317 a22 2.548 2.548 2.757 276 3.033 2.032 534 2.,70 2.670 s649 4975 4.975 7to Smrfre. 1-4.

OtYrr Crsl NJld, ar

-offl,.

SlatE..

flDeoasa_

nabla Ca-A.

-lyo.

Do.a.. E M14S-5430 Rrv. 0 App..dIx C. Pa1 10.fIS Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DlECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands or2003 Dollars)

O54,S.

£.R8v NRC Spa F4Foo S..

P.....

e d

8-Vo BSna UtitWRYd AC"aty Dea.

R

.l PaFsoglog T.oopat P-oo.oIg Oapoool o

Toal Tobtl Lk. Ta.

M.oo o.s R.fto.Go Voe Ct..A Cl..l CI..sC GTCC PFne d Cral Coe.

Ird..

Adl lr Iba C."t Coot C-a.

Coas Cn b Coot.

Cont Coal Coot Co Cats Cats C.e Fot C.. Foo C. Fal C. NFO C. Foot WL L9 MAtthss Ua.4,oo.

Patlod 2b P.FIto&tMdt Coot (-t.)

2b 4.6 Dispe lo dDAW g&MtOd 2b.4.7 Pla sagy bW 2b.4 5 NRC Fo 2b.4 E

mqatgaY PFt*V Fees 2b.4.10 Sts OSU Cost 2b 4.11 Sprd Fl Pat O&U 2b4.12 Ratost PFhOVg Eql._oKSAt 2b4.13 1SFSI Op tg Cats 2b.4.14 Seaty Stald Cool 2b4.15 DOCSteffcod 2b.4.18

-I saty SaNf Cost 2b.4 Sfctot P.F d 2b PFt4Oa Coas 2b.0 TOTAL PERIO 2b COST FTR1002.. O abIlor Foss.. 9 Wtt Fad Sto P..d 2e Dnd D

9Oa-ria Aclottsa 2s.1.1 Ra seap l Wacts olvosi of PbSya t5 D

r.. Syatsm Copo 2cl12 Tott Reodor5 B.A, Syotm ConVsal 2c1.31 tRH1 2c1l.12 RH3/RH4IRH8 2C.1.3.3 RHA 2C.314 RHJ 2C1J.5 RHL 2c1.3.6 RHX 2C1.3J7 RHY 2c.1+/-8 RMCC 2cl.3 Teoa NM. Rdoso BLautg Sot C.swsern 2c.4 TOtS Old Radwata 9B&g Sytt C howt 2c1.8 Totals Tthtea B.

g Syals. Catanrto 2c1.6 Tout Ad.Vot O"

Sytm Cosgeta 2cl.7 Total Mksfta Syotam Cerobt 2cl.8.1 GAAI OCA 2o. 1 Totl Oa as SR d

58

.B 2s.1.1 ReaS l

II9l.as.D 2M.l Totl 2X1.10 Soafolig h. rW80ootr do A.ck 2C.1 Ss Fhd P.W 2c Att Comtt 1.290 6.4t2 SASS8 25.83S 423 44 37 S:

5 22 33

.2 40

3 66 5

348 102 102 2.543 23 497 204 1.106 275 2.671 sos 496 106 2.671 21,sD2 38.8.3 23 407 n70230 1.9s5 1.752 31.636 98.454 1

16 lASt 1.40 120 0.316 1,318 21 30 30 103 793 M3 40l 3.07o2 3.07 74 01 29 225 22 401 3,072 2.072 3270 2s.072 2S.072 S.82

44. 0a 4.4.809 i2.509 O610" 9594 3.;0 33.902 218.68 194.042 30.31 850 2.80 2.80 15 57 87 35 100 1900 tO 69 6s 13 73 75 8

42 42 It 104 104 Is as es 36 205 200 ISO S"5 503 8.631 2

3 1

1.214 102.200 217.791 2.677 U4 77 A.1

. SO 9

2

.1 345 4

343 1 4 771 ItO M06 38

1..8 034220 6all,03 7.356 2.124 1.118.231 2S.a44810 500.476 1.116.331 573.110 1.071 14.041 847 24.800 2.005 6,71 80s 11.61 744 8.068 483 3

18.532 800 11.144 829 41.218 1.472 128.913 8.015 57 6S

.0450 I

1 23 10 2

1 20 25 1

0 3

15 0

1 I9 7

o o

7 S

1 1

28 1S 1

1 28 5

2 2

62 37 7

7 207 122 l 1 2

l8 I1

.2 18

• I-350 It 350 3t0 467 3b0 4Q7 167 702 1.043 10 12 91 10 1262 3

1 24 4

78 es 357 1.962 341 1.403 1.403 341 1.405 9.405 47 245 245 1m100 0.411 5.03n

.63 542 1.16 842 2

s4 1

Is 49.4 r.64 147.20 17,34 147.206 17.344 13.367 4.176 70.597 30.920 TLG Snfrmtt r".

OyWt C,.-k Nwe-. r-l.,.ai. St.Ms.

N..o....dosid Codt Atrrlyd

)-..._

,16.14S1&t R1.,. O Appdfrt caPog. 11.f 1S Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

I I A Ott"t LLRW NRC

$poneF.s S4 P"s=sd

.lvole.s Bw U1Ity asd D0..

R.osl dig T.-spos l

MP-0 Ott.

TrA I Toed 10 Ts.

4.n Rst..

C...A C-. S C... C GTCC Possd Cnfl C.er C.e Ce C

en C-Cost c-s Cost.

Cest, eh

-t e

c..s Cost.

C..n Cs. Fr C. Ft C.. F.0 C. Fst C-. F.

Wr_. bs.

be

.sIa M-,n I

Ind*w Arlhes D ecKp be P.4d 2X CoislolI COWS 2c.11 PFos SWd4d wi 2c.3 2 S." ld es.

2ci33 Dw b.L Ea 4 DIstson 2&s3 Sulekl P. bd 2. C eUtW Costs Po 102c P..Id.Doeos,.o costs 2cA 1 D.n.,..fd 2s.4.2 lo.s"Wnc

2. 4.3 PMe"yo 2c4 4 H-M pePda 2c4.5 Hff SWOWN MM0 2e 4.0 DMo" Of DAWg td 2c47T Pb.4..og

• rgs 2C4 J N9C Fo 2c4.9 E

nMOcY PI.s Fr.s 2c4.10 SOt. O&M Cast 24.11 R

n.d Procea E

2A.412 tSFSOt ctsc..ot.

2C4.13 S.*V StoffCost 2s4.14 DO0 Staf Cosd 2e.4. is Vtty Stbd CoA 20.4 5510010 Pald 2e Ptd.Deped. Costs 2e.0 TOTAL PERIOC 2e COST PEPHOO 2.. L b-** T*.stktn Pretd 2. Dcd DOho...slon Ac*,Nl 2.1.1 ORtSE e en 2.1.2 T

r-Aws..

20.1 SutOd P.iod 2 Actet CWos Paled 2e Adls-M Cost.

2e.21 MM0 S" s ys 2.2 Sul.d l Pe0,d 2e A4dtt9a Cot Pedod 20 Cot.e Cots 2:.231 DOC sttf bluf evn sss 2 3 Sutddld Pelod 2. Cdete Cost.

P,.

2. P.d-Oselod Costs 2.41 bosme

2. 42 P

vet os-2.4.3 Hsldh pW s

2.44 Doosa d d DAW;ed 2.14.

P bM

-W 601d9

2. 4 NORC r.

2.4.7 Evncy PIsng Fos 2.4J Slt OW Cod 2.*.9 ISFSt opn&q Coth

2. A1O S.dAY St eCod 2.4.11 DOC StowCo 2.4.12 Udy Stff Cos 204 Su'ddw Paed 2. Po Deod.4 Cos.

2.0 TOTAL PERMO 2. COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS 57 21 54 268 28 sO 23 537 8

S7 28 8o T?

537 304 03 03 701 251 1.100 s

10 3

77 75 304 71

• 175 2s2 00 e79 3.807 83 t,3S1 15 3

7 16.598 932 2.423 172 16¶ 094 230 10.590 lie 110.

115 4.572 2*

Vn 1.097

1. 027 Y41 753 1

17 94 327 185

• 00

• .090 4.090 0.70 404 4

1 17 12.2ne 444 4

1 17 18.052 8.476 40.178 9.919 4,221 29.770 0.087 181,119 108 500 508 4

33 33 114 030 830 224 1.305 1.38 21 103 103 50 554 5Y4 70 771 nl1 e3 314 314 100 1.2S 1265 21 117 117 20 202 202 30 334 334 7

79 28 202 202 38, 290 290 7

07 102 781 7n1 071

• .375

• .79 1.482 11.302 11 362 2.6e0 20.008 20.73 4.019 27.587 27.434 421 53274 02 8 0DO 3n 303.507 739

( 1000 73n 421 3*.781 821 57 132 14 429 13 1.3 2078

32.

0.0 13 1

10 32 20,750 329 255269 135 Is 10.37 9.3n

• 21 1254,120 32105 255.289 35 10 10 35 140 150 I.371 0.943 8.943 1.371 S942 5.943 98A4 9844 a

184 1.20 1261 104 1201 1.281 St 59 S9" 7n 428 828 116t:

SW S0 27 27 14 109 100 33 359 359 a

84 20 210 210 S

61 0o 440 40 14 4.704 4.704 083 4010 J66i 1878 1 6403 14.497 3.449 21.097 21.052 72.257 417.818 368.551

• 24.307 2.55 3D5 8,105 78 107 4

30

.S

-7 69.321 14 0,10 19 1.32 44.877 1.389 307.200 272230 8.101 031 41.001.770 073.765 2.072.706

77.

- i.nie re.

.ef.r Cnsrk Nodlrt frb,,tafIf Stao."

D-n-lo"Mg Ca lA."a.

Dorornl EIS.143 014e Rf,. 0 Appep.dtx C, Pge 12 of D Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

On-smo ILRW NRC Sp.M F-I s5.

Pc---d e-n 1

it."

Utity l

Aelhity D0cn R-d PosogleIq Tttpo Prflect:.g Dtpes On1 Tobl Totl UtL. Ts M..oto Rnt..9 Ve$.,.

CIl A

Cl".3 B

C--.. C 0rCC P

sd Crat Co.Uto

1.

Ad" D.t lot, C."t C. e Coet.

Cot.

Co-ts Cota co"t Cosov et Cot.

Cotta cott C Ft C...t

c. Poet

r. Pi CuF..t WI Lb.

Mot..h M o PERIOD Sb. S31 Roo0t-e PFttd 3b Di.. Dnoistve."

Aa.

O-DI.. of RtSt*

S tks E 3b 1 It Stokb/EOt,. T-

. Roe 0

Sb..¶.2 Ad 4e bo&V 3b.t l J AgeMWd OIfGfon 9" 39t.1.4 04.*tot 068 3b. I.I.

D OtetI CG-osl B.W.8' bt.1.1.8 5

IM S0t1 C

Sb3ttJt.1.10 aS Wm*

PtAar I

So. I.1.11 htA* S~te.d.

3b.t.t.12 L Lwel Rdvft SWp Sb.1.11.I Modt* Sheo Wb. 1.14 Win GC. SB.*p 3b, 1118 ttt MA" Sbe.1.17 ai.11-aoe SMe0oo Sb.t118 Na R&doot OSd b1.1.19 No S.

PU H.o k.1.1 20 0

nS Db.1. 21 Old R"dwolto BA*V 3b.t., 22 Pbd4 E rs.O.

3b.t.1.23 PNttttM &Ag 8b.t.1t24 RIoM, SI40g 3b.1.l.25 SV4 Ped Db.1.1.28 Sr. E nwgtc B"D Sb.1.t.27 T.* Pos&A MitC Ywd S.1.1.28 Tbw tb"s bt.t1.129 Tubh. P4 3b.I.1 Tdtob Sa. Clcaes A.046.

b~i2 Rs-. R.414 Sb.1.3 On4.t & bde f.

Sb.I.4 FF dM.

totNRC Sb.1 Sdaf.1 Potd Sb Ad" Cost Poted Sb Ad d COst.

Sb 2.1 Ca.t-Cenek Sb 2 S

t Ptd Sb A oCot P.ted Sb Co4tWd CoWt Sb 3.1 S-1 td toWo&-

Sb.S SU0o1d Pot Sb CdW.od Cst.

840

- 41 241 28 9t 410 4

Is 32 383 77 82 275 692 304 480 214 361 139 27 4.157 12 250 698 3.438 407 14.227 128 984 9S8 t8 507 3

277 4

30 14 105 1r 133 17 133 I

1 I

37 21*4 2

208

• 27 203 12 95 41 318 104 M1 8

3498 n

• 2 32 240 54 415 21 180 4

31 624 4.781 2

14 38 209 105 8W3 518 3.9"4 61 498 2.134 1.381 968 507 277 1tO 105 133 II 4

21t 37 YO m3 203 95 318 796 348 9

246 410 180 s31 4.781

,14 288 803 I O.U 468 MM.394 96.33 3.488

.434 1.15 17273 178

,34 330 578

• 5

.854 14.81 3.021

• .257 4.84 10.17

• 4.807 7.33 148 3.675 t5,45 2tl20 49s 838.44 201 3.0 9.514 51.425 S.050 20M.785 8.680 1.002 7,882

• 345 52 397 117 18 134 134 21252 3205 24.574

• .,D 430as 48

• 430 5

e 8 499 7.002 23.;44 10.759 1.483

2.

1.50 219.028 1.040 499 489 2.857 2

Y87 102

4.

2 188 102 24 18I 188 rto.%rrest e.

"MtI, C,..& Nsef-G0-tsot.. StaHio

&t mmooelaIosl-rg Co-l A...?y t Do.a.ssot Fl&143S3

sJ4, Rev. e Ap,-dIoG C, rnt9 1tof 15 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Demommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

UT.t r

L5 55, Opf it st fboOOOmlVoo0 oElotly*

I.-

I

=

D0s Rf.."a pd40ag T.tsw PFqrs Diposa MM Totl Toa T...

-alq.t Rass"os Vlota C

A A

CI-S Cl.. C GTCC Psosd Cft Con66ot Co."

Coo Cot.

C-"

Cost Cost Cot.

Co.

e C-t Cot Codnt Co-t.

Cur.Ft Co..Fo Cs Fo C. F-t C Foot

> L-M Ms.onh-o FCtT U-pr PF1 31b POq-d.4 Coals 3b.4.1 F01V0t 3, A 2 Ppt" Is-3b a

3 Hnty oqt-A nnW 3b44

-ta

• F

, b.odM 3b.4 NltC tSFSI Fas b4 a En-y FPh.

Fss 30.4.7 ISFSI OPmS Cool 3tA6

• 8 sOeSUCodt 3b049 S

S ld tAtCot 3b. 4.0 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.1 WiUy tff Coot 8b

• S5td P.t 8b P.

Dependent CoWs 3bD TOTAL P5ER0O1 3 COST PER OD SC. Fwlst lotga op olllp P.d 30c Drot D-ft*41Vs AeOwnb Pedtod 3 Coctl Coats X3.1 Sp.6 Fa Car6 ad TMssW 30s Sl PlOWd 3C Cdw Coa P.

SC Pt

-.O.,I Cools 304.1 kataWc o4.2 P.1 0 tso 3A43 Pho.W bod 04.4 NRC SFS1 Fe" 3c 4 5 E~b-y P-ksV Fsst 34 6 Se COAM Cos 30 4.

IYSI1 OWS" Cot.

304.6 S-Ay Stal Coo X 49 Ufty Saff Com 304 SL&C40 Perod 3x P~Ome4dM Cost 3X.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3X COST PER100 3d.GTCC shItptg P.d1d 3d Dned t Aais Nbdt Sloan St y SysMt Rnnoi 3d t.

Vlsl v

&Ftt GTCC Dhosl 34 1.

T.tas 3M.1 SI o Psed 3d Ad"t Coest P.4d4 3d P.a t

CestS 3 4.1 htst..os 34.42 PtptAy t 3d 4.3 Ph" aTt budgot 344 4 NRC ISFSI FM 3d.4.5 E"twt y PWV Foss 3d.46 6 Sk O4 UCod 34.7 ISF#t Opo g costa 3d4 908 sty St Cod 34.9 Uny Saff coa 3 44 SkdI PtWt 3d P WDmwnk Coot 3X.0 TOTAL PERtOD 3d COST 3.127 3.327 25.1711 1.01 11ff 1.7

-,s lS9 3.625 7

1 112 40 48 5

ISI' 17 112 Il I T

'27 305 06 446 6825 124 040

• .510 677 "As?

• 4.177 627 4.tmg 40.412 2.z4u 21.'34 10,28 0.90 46.644 6200 020 7.130

.6200 92 7.130 1.03 123 1,70 8

3.6 026 172 127 636 313 5

0220 7.487 980,20 2.402 2402 6.s00 5,02 14.360 20srU0 5,024 40.20-221.683 207.340 7,30 7.130 5.34 220 I.49 1.131 2.926 6

.1 4.210 223.020 26.22 350.,40 ss.sn

5. 73,480

.7 02 73.480 411 72.st 411 72.o0o 411 72.0o s.r85 079 6.364 10.1?

1.018 1.1094 I

191 29 220 3.145 314 3.459 1,02-103 1.131 2.044 382 2.928 73 106 631 s.6es 6

00 4.210 22.611 3.422 20.233 50.068 6.504 58.s72

.58206 7.4A ra.02 300

.00 300

.001 300

.01 300 20 4

4I 11 03 216 f 0.001 216 655

.6t7 s.6s7 655 aesr e.657 655 6.6s7 6,607 2

27 4

41 0

I 1

10 0

5 2

13 O

4 2

4I 1I 113 28 244 603 6.900 s.6t7 27 14 13 113 24 244 1.0 2.49 411

72.

2.4 TLO S NerF I~e.

07.1,r C..kl Nodo-r G.oIsg Sed.,.

Decms.(W~o.Wog C-tA.IA,olyo v-.oootsl&IESS-(MK46 Rm. 0 Appesdi Cr P.,.14 of 1 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Tousands of200J Dollars)

I.,

+/-R6W NRC Spo Foo 5.

Ps..o BWl Volt.

Bttsod I Utl..dI Attdtty

-o D

.t-on R

Poiostog T.tpod P..td Otp-sl Olr..

T ofta

.I U.Too UIooto.s.st Rno Vo4nn Ct..-A Ct_.*1 CI.. C OTCC PFttd Cnt CcV.n te..

Aafttv D-Ap/tb.

Co.

Co.t Coot.

Coot Coott Cost.

Cot.

CDos Cst.

Cost Cot Cot.

C os C

Foo c

os c

F o

C oFlt Co.Fot nLb.

n.s MUntso PFRtOD

30. SFSI D.oootot Potod 300 Dld D

t A.Mln P.bd e3 Addsttos Costs 3 2.1 1fSS1 Lk.s. Ttt-oo 3.2 S.tb, Psott 3S AdXIm4 Costs Pndcd 3 Clotd Cost 3013.1 Smalt bd 30.3 Swktow Pnd0 30 C.hWod Ct.

P.

St 0osd.OopoSd Costs So4..1 bW0,.

3n.4.2 P

np ts.

30.4.3 Hsa7 op4 r

3.4 4 PtMtt b..d p,

304.5 NRC ISFSI FI' 30.4.6 SRt OsU Cod 300.7 6S006* lCool 3n 4 DMC Sff Cot 31..9 Utilty Sotaf Cos 30.4 S.low P5. 03 P.d.Owp4&os Costs 30.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3 COST PERtOo f n IsFrss1f SR*s oat Pe,13d 1S D.4 Otoel Ots Ao".

P.dod 3 Addkkos Costs X2.1 ISFSI Sko R-I..t..5 312 S

tN61,1 P.t 31 Addwai Cost.

Ptdod r1 Colo,4 Coost 31.3t S,

tod to WIs 313 Su.0tW14 PW 3t Cootostt Como Po 0Ii 31 Ps DmIe Cost X4.1 t

31.4.2 Pm5ty tot 310.i 1-q -P 4 nta*

S04.4 Plta.W budget 31.4 aSs OaM Coo X4.0 SsNy Stoff Coot 31047 DOC 8tTf Cost St.0.5 1.15111 St!ff Cost 31.4 SutddW Pn0d 31 P.Io&Os Cost.

Y 0 TOTAt PERIOD Y COST PFRIOD 3 TOTAF8 849 7

53 MO 1.292 95M 3.MO0 U09 7

53 5Y0 1.212 Ss 3.M0 5

5 1

7 I

7 210 210 80 7

53 e6 ft97 33 3

37 334 33 367 32 202 21 3

-24 103 10 114

4.

U 1

98 so0 9

r 202 3 6 279 253 30 234 1.081 170 1.081 o60 2.362 479 4.948 3,M10 n4 506.171 lt.895 2,Y0 3.00 4.72 50.171 10.88S 2.50 7

7 37 367 202 242 110 114 279 3.688 234 2.0 1.41 2510 4.508.

• .724 508,171 19.985 1+/-146 2

2 -

822 U

8 622

.,147 2-2 12 18 133

.7 78 112

.6 135 0.636 I113 1.180 1,437 3.147

,798 70.10 40i20

• 724 11 t

57.071 235.915 940.190 36 38 107 622 107 822 2

2 0

2 0

2

s.

1 2

18 182 18 178 68 10 75 I

10 2

12 4 0 0

6 44 29 0

33 117 It 136 t

472 72 613 749 509 180 1,437 26.785 307 58 6.M1 74.683 15.118 123.231 7.7T7 TI.G S.ik I.e.

Oysfrr Cmlk Nucleo, Gn 00 fi..g Shfid..

Dottt...d..irn fg Cotl A,.i.f.

D.,.tR E18 14$S-eo6, Rt". 0 Appe..dXi C, snq 11.1lS Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands eo z003 Dollars)

On-S£"

U.RW NRC Sp.tt F-i S.

F0o.d BWV Sonl I UtIIRY.

l A"Iy Doooa Rttd Pr N gsa Troospst Pn.lng DttPtAd oith TOWI Tll UL. Te MIb..

Re Vo Cl.. A Cl..* C GTCC P...

d Cft Coovodo 04.0 Al NO.-AP11 C."

Cost Coa CoC Coat.

C-t.

Cost.

Cots Cs F."

C.. F_0 Cw Foo C.. Fo C.. Fr_

wa!L-.

M o..hoo M..

TOTAL COSTTO DECOWASSION 9818 85.082 10.501

• .12 31,982 75.094 34231 105,088 684,477 4*0.331 1418648 42.406 383.250 268,r77 11t20 031 411

.257.20 1281.301 3.654.821 TOTAL COST TO OOCOMMISStON WITH 1870% CONTItNGENCY S144.4T7 IMosnds. 2003 don..

OTAL NRC UCENSE TERMYMATION COST IS 7T29% O S4048.31 0fftt.

of 20n dolrN, PENT FUEL MANIAGEMENT COST IS 2132% OR:

0141.64 th-d.

2D0 d..N OONt.UCLEAR DEMOLITION COST nS 68% OR:

14249

_O od d 200n dolo.

rOTAL Pr6MARY saIt RADWASTE VOLUME BURIED 1,"

ftbl F..t AL SECONOARY SI!t RADWASTE VOLUME BuRIED 221.830 rbkl Foot GOTA.OREATERTIHAN CLASS C RADWASTI! VOLtUE GENERATED 411 ee Foor OTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED 22,811 Mm OTAI CRAFT LABOR RCOUIREMENTS:

1.281.8D1 Eod Nohte.

tth h4ote bZI Hst odytd~

rcl oe t~at doeToldolote

_0

a. i tn th0s s0*y peotnod by d-_.dog t0.ff

0. botote. tI64tts t.h.

10.

bJ ttt01 W h

• 001 OtI5'&

' hdkttt,,

• ZttO tsl TT 77 Rerk. Ile.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 AppendixD, Page 1 of 15 I,

APPENDIX D DETAILED COST ANALYSES DELAYED DECON TLG Services, Inc.

0.,ter Crwk Notar, Or-o.ogM.fain..

ltodooio Coat A-ytl..

Dota..t IS-14.-O6 Rrr. 0 Appard6 D. Pot S of IfS Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands ot2003 Dollars)

O0115n LURW NRC Spool Fl

.Sd ft-.o0d unn Vob.o B1I UOIy ood As4ty D.

RosWd Pkahot..

T-.oopot P

ng Disosal Olth-T Total l

To-M.a Rnot VOv CassA CnB CO-nC GTCC P-d Cnft ConWeo A.0Y A

D.%nd.n Coot Coot

Cot, Cot.

Cot Costa Coot.

Cooth-Cot Co.t" Costs Costs Co. Foo C. Foo Co. Foot C. Foot Co. Foot W, Mls. Mtoht W--ot PERIOD 1. Sthtdooot t-oMgt Tt.oott 1t.1.1 SAFSTOR o50 d.. d.to-sroy 1.12

aFC, posi d

eofOonor o 1013 No44iauosCwnOlootp..atst..

1.14 R..

b h

& 69 8

.08

1. 15 Ibn od PF sd Dd..nS 1016 DMaoto PtiNy tytom a P1

,00 1

1017 IN Sod t

F t

PSDAR 1168 R.4-pbho dp

& wVos.

I., 'S FnI dotlw nt a y

tat 'IO E.WWO y lrt

10.

P1 End p4, 1 do01014b 1-.112 Detaht dby-plOdohbo..O, 10.1.13 D0-** t*s

..o sao 1&I.14 P"" kbSER

• EA 10115 P1S F

Sko.Spedt Ceod Shdy Adko*y Stod fr-1&.1t.1 P OM n pbdtV 0.41.00 br SAFSTOR 10.1.62 PbO B~0 10..1*1.3 Pttd sd ad lbu*V.

1.1.le.4 W nty Woo"oltowt 10.1.18 5 FKUal md 000e d1tancey 1.1.15 Ttar Dou"d Wei P-0o 1-1171 PbL.11 bo 1*.1172 Facily debeodt 1 doy.

10.117 TdA 9.s1 Aonnw 0*g rpys 1¶,1.19 D-k"m-Wgtzom st la-

-10.20 Dnh S d-t NSSS 10121 Oh*M-anheI-OM0tod 0at I10.22 Dowheewo eV&caootd

• g0 I10 StWSt PFd Is A"y Coos P101*41 Pottd.Oebd. Cost 104.1 hbovn 1.*4 2 Popty 1os 1.4.3 MOB" #"Lc KAT4o 104.4 Hwq oltot 15Oa a 4*

D, d DAW otd 1.4.6 Ptwd oM gy bodoot 104.7 NRC reos 1o4 8 E-w-y Pk.4. Fmoo 1049 Ste O&M Coot 1.4.10 Spoo Fod POst 08U 1.4.11 ISFSI Orw1 Coot.

104.12 Sovy Soff Coot 104.13 JIty Staff Cod 1-4 S.blotal P00 1a P04&O.Pom Coot 100 TOTAL PERIOD 1I COST PERIOD lb. SAFSTOR U.mHd DECON Aetlbbos 202 97 150 97 75 112 75 232 375 tS "3

380 15 112 112 r',

22 72 172 1S 112 112 II 56 86 11 "s

rt 17 126 129 II a5 88

35.

267 267

• 8 431 431 06 424 424 47 359 206 35 2r9 269 22 172 172 22 172 172 162 1.30s 1.30 1.300 2 0;0 1.000 1.500 1.669 3.159 4.920 4.167 3.120 zoos 2000

• 16207 3t9 312 214 100 100 1.214 89 90 7

13 102 102 13 103 103 27 205 200 I

9 9

1,183 12;0 2.383 2.9t0 491 3.471 3.471 35.8.0 1.734

?2

.2 221 2t8 5

1 23 as 371 101 200 001 71 006 24 422 sos 5

1 23 29.510 509 5

I 23 32.491 173 1.907 1.07 55 276 276 43 331 331 6

35 39 94 716 719 37 406 408 10 III 37 287 287 14S 9.113 It 9

145 1.114 1.114 2

0063 280.5

-289.08 4.421 34.470 33.164 4.912 37.941 36.635 40

.10

.0 62 404 1al 99 5921 37.421 8230

4.

10 9

46.

10 4 04 4;03 0 99 22343 1.306 404 103 g

482.233 TEL Smnfrnt, I-.

Oy.fw, Crook Noel.., roos,s.Ols, SI~tfi flo~osssoi..isg Cost As..kvi.

Dects-t.. EI1$SE t

0 App-odi~. APait3o(15 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands offOO( Dollars) 09-,"'

LiRts NRC SI st4 Net S..

P--.s 5.0.51 VokoC,..

B.s i Uldy sod Aol."

Doemi Ss-1o PsobsbTg 1'.osPoo Pt-s108 Disposal

=ta

.Tol-Tolol Ls. Toot

... Mots-tss I.tt.teoldt Vke,,tt Cl..*A ClasB C1assC GCC P-.ss.d.

Cteot Cos."Wst I W4&.

Aot D-ol.cost Co."

Cost Coste Ot ots C.".tCeet Cssts Csfts Costs Cost C.. P.0 C.. Post Co.FP.6 Co.FP.

Co.FMst Lbs.

Mhootot Mnts..

P.4. lb Dood LI s~sob 5 Ac#.Yst Deowo-"s*..o sf 04. Btid*vs W1.1.1.

N.- Rodwtes 5tItdnV Systoos RO.lWod lIb.11.

dC Rasostel %"4M. Systtt Sooo b5..13 Aog.t,,efd 0OR.

GM ssD lbII1 Dwo6a B."0.1 RetnoDtol lb,1.1.7 StocbISAl-a~t Tottosts Rsoo. 8 D-st lbII1 6 Tto4.

s3og.

DU* on so.

lb.I.1 TROWS 1IM S~ktstotPttod lb AC"~6 COst P~eR~d lb AMdottd Costa lb.2.1 Sost NetS Podl 11015M55 Ib.2 SMiObs P.to lb AdIdMsot Costs P.to lb Co.1swel Costs tb32 Pooo sq.4dwoO0 1b.13 S.0 100 tool OOwt WS.

5.488151 Potl~d lb CR641.5 Costs Podod lb Pb4Osdtd~, Colts lb.4.2 eo h

ss,14,os lb 4.3 PtsP.tly sto Ib.4.4 Health phylks atPo IbOs Hs.-Y qsilo'-tto-"s lb.4 5 Diotto ef DlAW Qtos~

lb. 47 P045 00007&AV"0 1b.45 NRC Psea lb,49 Entgotts Ptot-kVt Pess Ib4.10 SiM Ott Cost lb.4.'II SPot4 Pol Pod 0CM lbe412 ISFSI Opost.*k Costs lbdI 4.S-ety Sloff CoID lb. I Udfy Stoff Cost lbh4

&4,tot Pellet! lb PIt Awod.Op-Mo Costs lb.0 TOTAL PER=O lb COST PERIOD le. Pft.psotlss sor SAFSTOR Dots-ty Petlod Ic D8,0 Ae.ttsitlg0,55..

101.1 P P. eo 'sttp0o 59.4stt1,r stos."

-10.2 Metalt ctwsgt.,0t we..estreodw W, 101.3 weet s~bs.t-elt pi.

tss..sy lot 4 Se-, b.%*v~ Ssrsoos 1lat.5 P mm&

otuS1505 wdwst.m n

I&I S~btotolt.tto leAC8Ny Costs Petted IC Cocltot'd Cost.

103 SfttoM P.01od Ic ColoMto Cots 1628 2.184 42 341 4210 4210 I

1 2

3 814 2.443 2.443 1092 3.275 3.275

3.

8

.8 21 83 63 4

12 12 170 511 511 2.105 6.315 4.21I tlO2 "315 0.1S 37 3Zt53 43.1M 108 952 15 8.Tr2 83.993 g83s 8.115 1.217 9.332

.32 8.115 1.217 9.332 9.332 e23 19" e5 175 734 6 8 824 68 65 I75 734 94 m

m 314 1.485 148s 10 70 78 41:

2.2SS 2.285

• .1.348 189.835 269 I

.20 1 3,48 18 i-9.33 2`65 735 14 919 819 37 U

481 481 527 03 07 sn

1.

11 8

388 338 73 1

U 84 1

0 7

2 10 10 158 24 181 161

9.

4 8

103 103 25 3

28

.3 9

72 72 244 37 281 I.

1 3

21 2u 37 281 281

4..38 850 5216 5218 735 383 t

0 7

.345 1.172 8.644

.315

.775 451 67 1T7 740 14,460 4,913 28.578 28247 28 281 21 321 325

• 17

.2.339 20 14.81 72.41.

117

.2.339 29 87.2

.117 1.348 172272 64.239 672 36 448 61 47*

470 5

42 42 33 220 983 953 U

7 560 s0 T ".

293 1.515 1.515 3.00 o70 2 1n,098 093 22.708 093 21 73 196 613 3

219 3

73 18 813 349 1.610 1.650 0

4 4

350 1.854 1.654 1.606 189.882 298 I

1.508 189,882 298 7.0.Rh-..

Ie.

.rCo-.kA Nol.,

r-otior.fot.o DssolsolgCoot Aoalyl D~onowt EIO.1425453, Rev. 0 Appendfc D,P I,*of. El Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands at 2003 Dollars)

I-O.

gLLRW 3RG p-F-S d

o

4.

N-o-d 60Vol0 Bt.. I UA440 0d A.y Do).c Rotoo Pooogbg Tosospolt P-s.ssg Dsofosal Oltt Tds Telel UeT.

gad R

ntt Vd Cl.-. A Cl..S Ca-. C GTCC PoeWetd Cos Csn*cl Wd-Adtt.*DrOI-o Cos Cod Cost Costs Co.st Colts Costs Cost Cot Cost Cos" Cat Cs.Pos Co.F C. Fot C..FE CFost tt.Lh.

Moelooo P04od le P~DepwOtn*

Cost 104.1 husooc lc.2 Pp.Itosm lc4.3 He0h s"kg a" C 4.4 tt-y to c.45 DspodsiDAWg O-Vd 1C.4.6 P d0olWgy bsdg" iSe.4 NRC Foss 1lc 8 EnsPncy Ph.g PFot 1t4.0 SRs 0IU Cod Ic.4.1 Sp.0 Fuo Pod O&U 1.4.11 Isrso Ows-tshCoft lec 412 Sompty Staff cod 1.4.13 3 UatySRCos lc SPPett Podod IePsf4-Oo.W t Cosdt 100 TOTAL PERIOO le COST PERIMO I TOTALS PERIOD 2. SAFSTOR Doeocy M Wt Spat Fat Stg Ped h 2.Ohd Osst.Wbg Af~ft 2.1.1 Ocsohtospoctilt 2K1.2 SenAo-%s tha y

20 1 3 P -

scats 20 14 BSno s nM repbctsm 2&1.5 Uft q-Lfi_

281 S,&&" Ptd 2h Ae0.4y Cols Pe0d 2. CosAsod Cogs 2 S31 Sptd Fo Cm"o e

x Tbrw 2o S S~hOto P0dod 22 ColRt Costs P~ 520 Peetd.Ov-od.4 Cots 204.1 hw oa 2.4 2 Ply lyses 20 4.3 Hoedt phyls soPp" 204 4 DbPd of DAW eno0ed 2.4.s PI`* "sogy bodste 20.46 NRC Fos 2047 Esgnoy Plw 0g Foss 2.4.S Sil OSM Coe 2.46 Sp.,* Pevlfd OSU 2 4.10 ISFSI Opg.sth Cost 204 11 Soaoy Staff Cosd 2s.4.12 ULty Staff Cos 20.4 Sobbt PlM 2. P.t d

Cas%

2,0 TOTAL PERIOO 2h COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD S.. R... -osl 500 Fell.

SAFSTOR DOstsc P.44 3. Di0d Df-hhlt9 Ac~ifs 201.1 Pedo p.s oy end 381.2 RWo p0W4 dogs S *poc.

30 1.3 Pwfb-d.ld nd a.0y Sc.1 Ed pseo dona 3.1.0 De bddy.dd I 0 5 1,y 123 72 I

0

.19 1

0 216 646 74 196 5.986 IAN0 let 373

3.

32 521 6

93

.25 62 201 18 241 4.431 6

.221 1s9 6.997 1.382 03.04S 43 475 47*

52 5713 573 31 156 1SS 11 63 62 2

9 5

23 179 179 3

102 102 3

29 9

72 n

36 276 3

20 36 278 276 ass 5.096 S.09 623 7.349 7.023 1.068 10.317 10.192 11.391 73.03S 73.074 01 2.020 25 20

.7 23 1.0

• 7 163 326

.101 2.20 2

.32 32 131 l.96 191.902 23.119 86.903 1.9s1 622 2.655 37.277n 107.504 656.405 59 1970

.2.

577 6000 4.000 gm.

75 17 6

7 17 mg50 73 17 M6 7n 17 13.214 1.72 7,37 9350 1.066 31932 13.235 1.117 6.361

.365 13762 365 140.359

.36 140.399 97 90 0S 297 2.273 387 2.963 DO 4.6000 600 4.000 1.321 14.33 5 1.573 17 29 217 1.006 l0t 5ss 1.107 8.406 53 s.u05s 159 1.767 590 4.321 226S 17.620 166 1200 1.254 8.619 9.262 71,162 18.092 133.700 19.076 161203 19.576 161231 Is 112 112 52 398 2q9 11 e s6 1s 112 112 14.533 17.29 1.000 508 5.505

1. 77 4.621 17.520 1.290

6. 615

71. 162 103.700 161263 101293 mg 2.275 2.993 4.839 4.1000 5

4 0.6

• 6.363 127,317 1.502 1.460.617 6.363 27.51 1.5.2 1.0.67 6.363

.12.17 1.2 1,460.617 1300 4.000 1.000 1.3" 2.5Sn frI, io.

Ow"l.r Crk Nutt", Oorait Stati Daeromasldoztug Coal A.ayOf.

Daant E5143455.006 RD. O Appr.dlx rD Pace 5 otl5 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thouasands og2003 Dollars) off-r*

tLRW sRC SpolF.a st 7CCa.

8SUa Voum aa I dIAlysd l Adtiviy OsD R-a Poagleg Traspd Pcesg Diobs Ott-.

TotI Todal L.T&T Ma l

fto-st-Vdu Cla*sA CIs, aB ClassC GTCC P-ossad Cvt Cotn Itotn ALodg Cost Cst d Co eCt Ca.st Cos Cast Cast Casts Costa Costs Cat C. F.4" CaFol Cs..Fas ct CaF.

C. rs.t Wi.

bs".

V 1..s

tsalr, Sal.6 DeS;ealot.ss'o 3St.7 Padia SER old EA 3&a.8 Paft SteSoecfit Cost Study 3a 1.9 PpWefthl bee-Toaat-Pla 3.4.10 Raas NRC eosS fltao

-cf SpoMcalwe 3 t.11.1 Rt*vi

& b..

y foSde.

3-1.112 ph"r.y.l-3a1.t.il.

R..ctclaad

3. ItIA R w

d 3U1.11.5 S lCk ~i Sal1.

ii? Ret`osdaepastomoea Sit.11 aDTta 0`sa a1.115 PReoupp"aN' sbuabr 3Sal11.10 DOyeIt

32. tillS Ww oW a UAtt Sa. 1. 13 Facty & aft daoat t1i11 Told PtmFh a Swo FPradoes St12 PeP.dle ssauab 3.1.13 FPht"e pF I.e o

3t 1lt Detig aM deonup yAl U. 1 15 RlgaCat CMd EnOsbo&VAM 3a.1I FP s asftsn oArdMa.s 32.1 Spaloid PFld 3i AC" Costs FW 3 Cabld Coat 3Sai Speeo Fud CaW d T-sfe St3 Subtol Fatal 3. Che S" Coaso Pwiot 3. PFd-Oepedo Cose 3.41 4

'I Wsoo 384.2 PaFsyes 31.43 HAMM pyiys spgen 3.84 A Messy eqAao -'

3.45 Dp oflAWgeerad 3.4.6 Flt ~eey budget 3 4.7 NRC FM 3h 4 e EFg-y PW-F-

3. 4 9 S Ob MCost 34a1o sew Fud Fad Oam 3a.It Sawky VARt Cod 3h4 12 U yStff C as 3S 4 stt Fetad 3S FP~dp-Oe Cast 3S.0 TOTAL PFdOO 3. COST PERIOD Sb. Deaooessag Pajsla Fated 3h Dkd D.Madt*a AcMafe Detaile Wa.t PFadAss 3b.t.1.1 Flat s

3b.1.l.2 Raclltorsals 3561.1.J Reeob&'gbink 562 232 370

?S 84 "at "a

35 267 26?

se 431 431 46 353 3S3 7?S00 5.3100 0.009 4.006 5* 2 3

63 571 312 47 SOS 323 532 8o 612 812 487 73 s80 se0 37 i

43 43 7S n1 ee iS 120 18 18 e6 3

312 47 359 359 150 22 172 I??

120 Is 1M3 13M 234 35 259 134 345 52 3as 596

.67 10 70 39 3342 501

.844 3.02 134 M1

. 341 7T370 4.16?

7 100 e.soo sce ucyS eoo1 4167 1.609 3.120 900 44.624 2.43.

.4 123 77.z00 TT550 180 52 92 1 0.275 27 207 20o 363 2.782 3.782 lI 121 121 507 2.355 2.353 It 106 106 lslt 11.817 11.47s

• .00 no 8.520

• . sco n2o 5.20 5.520 3.520 221 288 5

I 09 8

I SW U0 U4 924 924 999 100 1.0o9 1.0"9 5'

276 276

-43 331 331 23 6

5 35 g

9 70 539 539

• 371 37 406 toe 101 10 lII 250 37 267 267 988 145 0 Pr13 536 1o es1 611

• 1378 3.45 18.833 18.633 23 20.906 3.120 2469 23.34s 23 3.961 139 41.9 34.820 404 Il 1.113 1.224 404 6.a 341

£04 8.103 9

-32.

1103 99 20.564

,103 89 3719114 355 3D0 101 53 406 347 4s 34S 345 10 118 29 41 7

?

4 733

4. 009 1.310 T7L.nfirn. Ic.

DeoaotIasiosf Coo-Aolo-Dos-.tt8 EI&IdS35.01t R". I?

App-d..L D, P.C. 0 aris Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

Ot-Oto u.W NRC Spoo Foo St.

Pls-.4Baa V.

0.a I

dt o

AC"bf Deo Rost PaUqht Tm-p-o Poss.t Disposal fw0 Totl Total UW. Ts.

Msott s1 RIt V-V

.. A CIs8 CI... C TCC P

Ss dl Coi Cotondl 0d,4I AtMI l"

Cst Cost Csts costs cCosts Costs Cotat Cost Costs Costs Cots Cots C.F.ot Cs.FedCs.F V..t Ca.

Foo WtLSs.

Ilnhows Ma.o Deod Wok Fonkss (<O d) 3.114 CROls h..p

& Ms 30.1.1.6 losco d09sfst0etAt 201.1.5 S00105 h

3b1.1.J RoOC65 -e4W Yb1111 T bW R

owde 3b01.1.9 5fty losool MIA1 T

u &eve s1 1 13 R

tS6*bdt 9b015114 Roec65astg b 1.1 Todil 36.1 MANtW F.b 9bt AsWy Cot P.ttod 3b A htol Cost 39b2Zl Sftt C bWadt.toalo 3b02 DZZ O

n of Ltad RCRA West. (od load) 30.2 OesoWn d FPCS Se4 RCRA W"tt (to Ind) 3b.2.4 ODleotstt of tLd ab-t-y 3b02 AZd st5 R-nda400 3t.2 Sdlts! Pettod 3b Addlmd Costs Padld 3b COsoeb Cosh 3h.31 On

• qtyMs 3bl32 DOC staRlocatos &nb 3b.3 3 Snv4 ad o

3b0l34 Plpn addnag ed~so 3bR2 I

Srenl Fool C47lbl and Ttn.

3b.3 Sdrlo Ptlwod 3b C d110" Costs Podod 3b PtOIbd-O.

Dtsos Cost 3b.4.1 Dttnntg 3b.42 tsma 3b.4.3 P

apt to."

3b 44 H.ofth tdrt A"

3b 4 8aanY qdtosas Hasnl 3b.4.8 Dispoal of DAW 0

30.4.7 PMO Sta 7 h."

3b, 4 8 NRC Fss 3b.4.9 Elrqw Pi.n Foos 3b.4.10 SRO 05U Cost 3b4.11 Sp. FoelPtdO&M 3.4.12 Sald Staff Cost 3b 4.13 DOC Stal Cosd 3b.4.14 Ula SbslffCosd 3b4 S.ltot Pe'od 3b Peed D.P.W.s Cots 30.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3b COST PtRIOD 3 TOTALt 75 70 150 90 90 70 312 I tO 2*

04 Z04 t412 t452 9791 9.791 628 957 828 1082 19

• 145 t19

to 686 1 1.06 648 12.09 9

29 52 56 1.320 2

44 1

43 71 1

113 2.192

?8 152 1.097 2.400 3.49?

421 501 2

1 12

• 235 1M 51 12S a4s 200

• 383 8.376 2

1 12 14.029 3

I13 2.192 728 2&130 a

11t Z192 7n1 W9i11l 1 1 6

88 11 61 88 22 l72 172 41 313 313 13 103 52 13 103 103 1I 60 43 47 359 359 22 172 172 31 235 212 31 235 212 3Y 2.820 2.tS0 3N 2.820 2550 9408.

4.098 4.098 61 616 861 252 1.930 1.930 7

03 53 2.033 13.104 13.184 3.916 19.803 19.e83 94 m

m 164 1261 1261 1

149 145 143 l,1D 1.1100 390 2,7`0 781 5.968 3.228 5

24 24 42 403 403 50 551 551 141 707 707 22 166 166 3

16 16 35 270 270 19 205 205 s

8 16 144 lot 73 559 40 306 306 507 I.610 3.890 1.258 9.633 9.832 2Z21T 18.993 18.176 7.260 45.682 42.039 12.671 87588 78858 52 43 24 24 70 270 2.000 3.630

~1210 1 2CO 1.000 4.167 2:000 t730 2.730 a32.740 32.1740 2.019 110.076 27.*00 1.020.00 31 22.080 19.193 249.5t5 150.230 29.050 16.t 2.t09.871 10.23r Z760 203 4.083 s0 se 18.209 52.288 34.113 814 so203

.06 50 202.807 3.374 270 29050 19.398 2.10.734 150.200 235147 10.118 611 29.050 16.010 2,016.837 110.372 86.461 71 G Sem gF I/e.

• Ossfr,* Cn..

?Jsolt, Ot-olo'aM R~H..

A

-oo.4-al.jr~

Cool A-alyst, D-.~.ttt EI&14&5.1E4.( nb. I App.'Jdt D. Pal. 70f 15 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) o06S."

LRW NRC S"t F.,.

So.

Prsod anal V1s Balst I Ut,10y and Adty Do R1atd Psd.s T.nspod P o=ssar Dispos.

OtN_

TOal Total Us. Tans Mast-agsat R1tlotota Vatun.

Clan A C-. 6 Cln*C GTCC Pas

.d Cstt Coo8-.

54.5:

Adftt es Coll Cant Costs Cot colts Cast Cost Coo Costs Cot s Cobat Costs CU Fost CVl Fas C. Fs Cs. rast C ls Wl.tb.

I,-t-a MantI,.

PERIDD A. Lio C0oWmp Rat Patid a Did Do cmWssixft AcMW Nosd-Sloas S4p* Orost" R-at l

45.1.1.1 Racoka.01ao Pws.5 S Wnto 4.1.12 C DUsS VRol R

-attss 4.1.1.3 R=an V.nsd hSt~s.e 46.1.1.4 Vos11a4 S tn-ott1, GTCC Dtbteoa 48,111.5 R-Cad, V."s 4.1.I Totas pot alond at4.J. fqs*o-td As 1.2 Mat,. Tulk*A~O6MtMWn A4.1.3 MAM c-A-4ssa Olseosid PWN, Sstotn

~t6SYat.M.

Coneansal 4.14 Tofs 401.5.1 RCI/RC3 4s.I 5.2 RCA 48.1.5.3 RCR 4a.1.5 4RCO 4".1.:.

RCG 45.155 FCJ 45.1I.5.

RCM 48.1.5.8 6CN das

.5 OPCs A.1I5.10 RCT 4W1.

Totals 4s1..

R20 4s.1S.3 2P 4' 1.5.4 R

Al'.::.

R30 4.166 N3t 4.1. SS NIR

40.

.8 N301 4s.1.6.12 N3T 4.11.613 NYJ 4.1.6.14 NYW 4&I.6.15 MOY 4s.1 8,56 N5l 4a.1.6,18 N53 4.1S.To NPS4

45..S.20 NSt 4Ls.1621 NSO 4.&6.22 NSA

4. 1 23 NSB 4A..5.24 N5C 45.1.825 NSD 7

77 j

33 27 124 181 84 1.741 2.685 300 4318 77M S9 68281 3.979 l7 42 765 17 419 482 3.1 132 5.501 209 5.1 M32 704 42 15,169 263 229 1.167 170 40 3.5t2 12.230 o55 a.5a7 4.089 18.oY 11.103 37.681 1.167 940 12.230 6.6r7 sr 694 37.689 107 1.093 M.150 l15o 179 112.850 3.338 1.502 1.377 287 300.825 17.509 832 A-7-.9100 1.203 1.94.750 57.509 832 107 23.939 1.377 287 411 2.348,475 40.512 1.885 59.003 2.5.154 4.957

38.

1.o53,126 18510O 232 549 II1 9.24 714 342 94 3290 292 7.144 7144 72 5.159 5.159 3

41 240 4S 48 73 16s 58 37 745 I

1 I

12 21 1

1 45 5

4 321 I

3 92 1

1 50 I

S 120 2

5 170 4

3

• 1 110 0

1 3O 1

27 895 137 1I I

1S 80 19 112 110 M83 29 167 20 120 V7 235 s

4*10 51 277 55 91 360 tl79 80 112 69 1.87 120 230 410 277 91 2.179 1A 147

.9 147 U4

.01 16 3.97 1.13 l7I tl1

• 1 2.107 639 330 44 11,078 412 577 63

-11731 8890 21.99 1.009 161.354 5273 46,1 3 1.020 25.044 1.068 60.130 1l34 asSal 3,.10 55442 1.313 18.858 807

• 88.708 16.488 508 2

2

8.

0 19 0

1 48 0

1 55 0

1 11 I7 0

1 57 0

0 12 0

12 0

57 0

0 78 0

74 4

143 3

7 23 0

0 40 S

I 12 0

0 50 0

1 74 I

2 21 0

1 27 0

1 12 0

19 8

0 2

.6 29 28 32 412 2

1 38 14 15 55.

49 107 52 158 247 I9 10 6

20 15 4

8 33 59 23 5

25 12 48 253 3

Is 9

7 16 96 20 117 3

1a 22 127 7

39 4

22 4

24 7

40 3

59 54 293 58 315 74 474 10 87 10 52 57 93 5

28 18 102 28 194 12 70 10 63 4

24 7

39 253 362 196 I5 49 57 345 S4 309 117 501 16 27 3

127 447 39 179 22 80 24 97

• 0 187 19 58 293 650 324 315

• 643 359 474 3.014 57 239 52 1

121 28 n3 248 52 28 46 15 102 44 44 184 34 70 290 16 83 307 28 156 39 152 32.343 2.373 2.007 178 13.630 406 18 1911 1999

• 20.342 1.237 1.398 209 16.140 1.492 7.257 374 3

.260 261 3

.934 256 797.3 387 357 210 03.705 1.67.

SS. W4a 1 8 89.024 1.740 124.029 3 141 9.707 621

7. 54 539 14.050 915 3347 209

• 1.609 1.114 29.828 1.527 13.130 842 12.480 503

• 294 267 6,

6190 428 SW Ront*leeo14.

Oyle-Crr k N-I,

-l..f Staffon Dlro..-t~o~fo.

Cool A.ooWf Doru....

EIF1'1455-008 Rrr. 0 AppeodtA D. Page 1 oflS Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of2003 Dollars)

Ot ts.w LLR.W "RC Sp Fos So fPot Boos Vo..

Btl 1Ut4 y osd ACs"8 D eos R.o Ptkn"g Trpot 0prsss Disp Oth TOMi Td-l LlsT T W.

Rs Vdu Ci.66 A CGI.. B Cl.- C CTCC

.od Cnft conttso hd#

ACst CCu Coob o

t Costs Coot Cost.

Co."

Co.s Cost Cost Co.st C.

.4 Cu.F..t C. Fo_

C. PFot C. rst _t.Lbs.

M-h-u Mo.o.t N-R8*&too &'S Syjt Co.bo-t (dW) 4&1.626 NSE 40.1.6.27 N5F 41 8.28 4NSG 4a.1.6.29 NS1 4'1.8.30 NS 4..1.6.31 NSJ "18.32 NSK 4".1.8.33 NSN 4*.11.34 N50 4*18.35 NSP 41.1.8 38 NS(3 4 1.rJ7 1NS5 40.18.38 NIT 4.1.8639 NSJ da 1.640 N5Y 40.1141 NS2 4&1.t.62 POA 4&1.6 Tdxbt Old Radoe B9MA Syph Cam-woo 401.7.1 "SA 4*1.7.2 7DA 401.7.3 TFA 4-1.74 MSA

4. 1.7.5 PDA 4&1.7.6 PMA 401.7.7 PFA 401.7.8 P1IFP(0 401.7 Tcbals T

u.otk NA&g Svt-C&Vnbs 4&I.S.1 7CA 40.18 2 T32 4.18.3 T823 40.1.8.4 TS38 01.8.5 TC2

" 18s.

TE2 40.1.8.7 TEE 40.1.6.8 TEO 40.1.69 T°2 4018.10 TF3 40.1.8.11 TPE 4.1 8 Td..h Augtwsed Offos Systm Cop..of 4&.1.9 TotAI Mi.o&o S M.

Co o

401.O

Totl,

40. 1.11 S3tdr"g h, dV of drhdor.hgtt09 40.1 SkMM P.4o 44 Ady Cooto Potld 4.5 Addft Co b 4.21 Cub Sue. tgo (¢oolg RPv) 4: 2 SdloW P.40 o aul Coos

• 13 19 49 61 8

10 19 49 19 Il49 50 24 24 1.417 00 0

0 0

0 10 28 0

0 0

0 2

T11 10 41 9

7 9

3

.5 0

5 4.

11 12 54 15 12 I5 12 1m7 49 8

49 a

12 4

12 4

48 1.268 387 5

27 27 8

44 44 3

15 15 3

17 17 3

18 18 23 23 20 20 7

38 38 21 127 127 10 57 57 10 56 56 39 287 287 22 11 131 22 131 131 9

49 49 9

48

• 9

20.

118 119 Om0 3.788 3 788 110 91 27 0

40 5

18 1

121 75 14*3 867 183

'8 182 47 t195 SO ?8 28 77 28 I. 13 12

. 153 12 0

572 10.660 1.219 4.43 278 6.103 41l 1.645 2DS 1.555 172 tO90 238 S

5.328 17 3.00 224 S

8.803 433 27.221 1.083 10.712

• 19 10..15 413 89.151 93 25.708 12118 28.767 1.128 7.230 545 7230 548 23.240 1.124 740.255 31.435 55 0

t 39 22 1

1 10

• 0 15 0

1 17 S

100 4

3 72 76 38 0

1 30 58 t

2 6g S9 22 315 7

a 243 125 s185 I

142 130 848 I1 27 9f2 4

3 11 0

0 10 1.07 45 112 39.2 131 2

8 202 220 4

9 333 18 0

0 11 118 2

6 215 77 3

3 as 57 98 3

2 52 66 2.548 7n 174 6.009 253 20 117 117 20 105 105 9

50 50 55 310 310 14 81 e1 3

15 16 25 155 155 3

14 14 148 847 847 101 570 570 311 1M.97 1."7 1

9 9

4 25 25 879 6,038 6.038

?7 501 501 107 73 673 6

35 35 62 402 402 45 254 254 42 234 234 1.636 10.698 10.989 4500 122 121 20D 25 893 258 373 54 855 305 30

3..011 404

. 1.755 390

.11.905 42 124

• 8.809 3.491 4.115 139 2.519 859 209

. 647 225 74.350 624 41981 1.246 15.829 718 10 642 349 s

M8 2.2238 15.150 800 2.174 190 34.703 1.294 1.199 202 155.9101 7.838 10.219 4.0M8 483.529 14.232 I.8n 85 5.034 229 1.974.54 23.615 141.941 2.83 187124 4.883 5.640 385 107.977 t578 50293 1.738 43.953 1.519 3.057.483 m8l" 583 10 3

95 1t 188 874 874 15.781 56.378

-e8.378 1.057 M

201.002 28.M2

.1.377 119 12.016 5.D5 1202 17.122 16.087 243 53.469 14.559 287 411 11.20.550 188.371 i.r.5 1.711 428 2.139 2.139 428 t139 2.139 Trr.n,i,.

itc.

tM-t-C-h C-11oo Aootlvd

&r ld C"Co tA..vd.

Dotesnt El614455,- Rrr. 0 Appretdi D. Polo 4 ofls Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) 014.

L.RW NRG Spmo Foot S..

ocosood 6.I 0-1,,.,-

S.oot UtIdy -

I A."t~

Dsmo, Ro.,ow Pk.6.5M 7,.-ptpnn4 oos-kvMq lsos 04 Ttal T

706*

tIc. oTsm Sboao.o6 R..stfol4 Vs.,,.

CIs A

sss S I5 7C P06..

tRC9~o R C Col Costs Costs Cost Coot Cots CTd Col Cosd s

Cols Cos C

R CO.oCA Ca si T

c CTCC s Ct C.tot bd*W Aelsry 0-ilb end C.-Cod Cosft Costs Co Cof clz Cof cbs,*Wy C

s costs C.o bC b Cw.

cf vF..

C

..rlCz c.F.

r..'

C.Fr Mbl,.

Mnb U.0 P.0 44. C dlots. Cosot 4&*1 Pmess saw s, 4,32 SaN sod os-e 403.

0 Sbkf P.4

• 0 Ccd0id Coos Pt sa P~dOvso,40 Cost 404.1 Osotono 4.4. 3 PtWt bn 4 44 H"M PI t UVPIo

• 4.4.

Hat obpt..rot 1.4.6 D= l d 0DAW gesotd 4.4.J NRC FP0 4.49 Sa OSM Cool 4.4.10 Rsdost P osh E9*o. ot,*O*os 4.4.11 Se"tAyStaSICod

• .t2 DC SWls Cod 4a.4.153 Uiy Stiff Co 4.4 S406 I Pedod 4a Pt

_d-D Cost 4*0 TOTAL PERIOD 48 COST P5O0 46.

l 51b SIM DOb.ol P.4d 4b Dkeo DOsvsn.o.*Vh AcO61o

• bD.1 RetS spoM 904odo O

qsposs of P1bd SYttt ast C oow ts 4b.1.Z1 "A.AC

• h122 ISA 4b. 1.2.3 ICA 4b. 1.24 1EA

• b. I1 ZSace 4b.1.2 700.1 ROKW ctafh SWslo C,..oo 4*h 1.1 RB1 4A"3.

RaB 4*h.13 RaE 40.1.345 R9F

• h13S.5 RBF Ab.1.3.8 Rao

• b.1.3.7 RaS 41.35 8 RBSW 4b.1.19 RC7 4*t1.310 RDS

• h.1.3.11 RDOt

• bhl.12 REC 4*.1.113 REF

• h.1.114 RE.RE h15.315 REL 4t.1.115 REM 46' I1.

REO 4b.1.11I REO 4h61.3.19 RER 4b1.J20 RET h10.3 21 REW

• h.1.122 REX 21 10 28 15 135 21 135 1o 24 15s 45 822 1.0 19 45 2.641 Ins 15,592 45 45 0.003

~7 1.16 10 220.

47 soe 554 420 1 200 9,409 16.720 10 220 31.097 35 270 270 20 154 140 75 425 410 11 5e s5 84 921 921 117 1.283

• .1m 205 1.027 1.027 273 2.092 2.092 e1 337 337 62 829 62s S1 557 S57 44 335 335 83 483 483 IS0 1.3s0 1380 1.411 10.820 0.820 20s 0

19.22 19220 5.000 39.149 39.020 21.353 110.091 109.94?

202 250507 40 1s 202 25.507 40 12

3. 839 70.938 943 73.-0--29nm 47274 283.511 120 3.839 7.9s 943 4*3.814 144 201.002 350701 1.5M0 207 411 11.302.990 187.3s4 455.479 1238 17.122 181T6 31.361 378 44 57 se 1.645 927 2.821 2.821 573.110 1.071 273 2

e8 112 a9 1s 44 43 439 6e6 5s 34 575 1.499 5

4 71 144 1o 7

149 220 3

3 715 635 o

1 34 78 48 905 1.930 72 70 83 354 2 3 62 2

32 142 55 4

144 37 4

112 17 37 21 12 II 17 61 202 3

109 3

120 3

112 3

Se 101 24 507 a

223 142 3

109 3

89 11 Iso 541 1

22 5

155 4

54 171 S

107 5

208 1

43 4

90 182 4

109 50 1

14 33 O

1S 3

0 12 0

13 a4s 5.332 3.332 109 513 513 ITS 851 601 39 229 229 16 96 se 1.007 0.021 5.021 64 409 404 34 216 216 S7 235 235 41 254 254 se 307 307 230 1.530 1.530 113 8sW 840 40 244 244 29 Ins 1R5 17 957 957 11 es es so 367 347 69 371 371 38 23 233 T7 497 497 1s go as 74 422 42 S7 331 331 29 131 131 13 83 63 7

39 38 7

42 42 7.111 4.507 1.41 67 82

.509er n

l440 11.199 5.502 2.495 1.354 1.485

.1.201 740 310 11.229 2.757 428 1.343

,.foe 1.841 1.624 26e 1.953 s7 515 1.320 3386 1.115 48M 1.311 ISO

¶80 11 16 1S 692.839 4.005 74.4s3

3. 32 1 304 0.037 04.47n 1.081 17.09 962 r74.

94 16.r47 101 30 2.913 53.019 1.089 r 0294 1.60 6.083 2.122 57.301 1.863 456.005 a.01 150.334 3.774

.545 2.081 a 44.81 1.308 2

21.

1.434

10. 870 e6O 79.329 3.132 73233 1.504 S03.80 1851 a133.45 3.177 21.646 426 es8

.644 i

15.995 1.114 8.443 6s7 s.93 422

.710 46*

TLo S.,de.

Mr.

Oohr C-& Nrreol GeerolHog Stafo-D0,..oUido.f.g Coot A..I o.

DoAs..dsL D.

145J46. Ros O A~pp.odlt D, rog 10s 1t5 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands ot2OO Dollar) 0l4.p.

ULRW NRC Sp Fuol So.

PoF 5.n8-Vo..

5*

IUAy

.nd A."oy D.

P t.o-ftt#g2g Tno.,.Po.0 PD.

Dip O

Totol Tot Lk.Tss.

U.....s Rotoio Vo.u ClissA c..

Cl-.c W

ree..

d Ceft CO I k.._

Ad"o Cost CO.

Cst Cols Cool Costs Cost" Co.4 Coss Cots Cos Costs C. roo C. F s

C_.e Fst Cu..F_0 Wt..b.

Uoto.n Ro.-h, S.dk Syslo Cosroo4 (osott 461.123 REY 45.13 24 RFS 4b1.325 RFC 61.312S RFF h1 3.27 RFM 4b.. 128 RFJ 4h1.321 ARR

• 61i.130) P71 4*h1.131 RFO 4h1.132 RGC 4 1.333 RGO 46.334 RCO

• 1.137 RGL A461.136 ROP 4b61.13?

ROR 4*1.135 RGU 4h 1.3.39 RH1 461.140 RH2 4b.1.141 RH31PH41RHA 4b.1.342 RHA 4*1. 143 REJ

• hl.44 RHL 4b 1.3 45 RHX 46.1.146 RHY 46t1.3.47 AICC 4b.13 Tot1.4 NC. Rad-so S1*V SYoto C aos.lo 4b14.1 N38 46 1.4.2 NAB u6.h 3 N*A

• l61

• NeS 461.4 5 N40 4&1.4.5 NAE 4*1 4.7 NMF 61U4.8 N4N

• h1.4.9 NKIK 41.1.4.10 Ni4L 4*1 411 NIL 461.4.12 NWV

• b1.4.13

.41W

• 61.4.14 N5X 461.4 Tdols Old A96oot 8.*Ng Syotos Cohvno

• A1A1 ORW Pr. DID 0

0. 04 Do.-

4b61.2 PRO

• hl I 3 PSS 4b51.54 PTA

• h1.55 PIA 461.5 PUU 4*1.57 PVA 4*l. 5a UAS 461.659 UAS 4*1.5 Tonb 23 109 24 se 76 102 89 07 77 101 eo 31 41 20 128 33 28 6

14 29 19 36 3 2 00 3.556 20 2

2 3

0 2

r.2 15 131 27 69 56 175 54 170 61 90 76 56 613 3

Is 132 27 7

11 23 10 36 30 00 5.009 1r627 6

47 46 293 51 24 31 185 79 422 74 397 24 144 33 200 22 23

¶39 170

.16N 14 84 I?

105 8

As 53 31S 21 122 12 74 14 69 28 1se 1

s0 11 63 6

35 14 67 13 7n 29 178 24110 12.620

'7 2937 244 106

• 22 397 14*

205 220 84 106 48 316 122 74 50 63 13

.7 715 178 12.62e

. 192-.

l

.22 337 207 923 M* 6 026 s60 010 754 1.1lie

• 42 667 1 0 056 414 0551 238 N12 547 339 5500 592 83 282 121 a o 369 09 61.983 4.901 7.781 512 65.869 2.414 32210 1.978

3. 7.469

1. 8 75.17 2.271 73.713 1.97I 30.625 1.282 45'.41s 1.712 382 a V79 27.107 1.343 406.453 3.961 16862S 794 22.541 917 9,61 437 6.314 2.623 22.199 1249

13. 7f4 733 22.340 G1s 24.061 1.780 6.374

.I 11.43 U

41 14.998 716

40. 185 1446

2.

.733 w

0.238 108 116 1

3 113 59 0

1 43 9

20 1

1 15 12 7

19 1

0 13 10 r6 50 1

37 S

1I 13 0

8 15 0

I 16 9

'I1 0

0 14 23 0

0 14 03 I

2 83 39 49 2

1 39 29 r

1 51 60 1

2 66 107 516 8

1 467 56 47 261 21 121 1

6 21 1t9 I

7 5

29 8

41 6

37 a

46 29 106 4S 200 2

9 11 232 269 1.438 21 1U4 5

28 39 234 11 so 53 311 52 322 2

9 64 40 6s 404 332 2.041 281 125 72 7

2S 40 37 46 106 206 9

231 1.436 184 26 234 g9 311 322

^9 406

• 04 2.041 1.392 0

.30 IS.10

'42 162 36 459 17 217 14 176 177

1. 029 482 1II 105 S.774 203

51 1.10 371 1,825 66 13 2.367 2.277 9.S90 66 8.536 2U547 21.506 1.295 10.701 067 5018.630 1.300 607 106 "a

96 289 10.036 337 7.138 352 7.195 525 41.782 1.16 27292

1. 918 401 14 34.178

2. 378 249.545 13.525 2,0

• 48,6 2096 10.04 603 0632

3. 66 78.471 2.224 19 149 96.117 4.84

92. 46 3.221 u393 19120 143 11 0

4 1

27 0

142 1

100 2

216 2

147 2

Uss 15 0

12 3

97 I

30 3

112 A

147 16 5

191 9

'44

-18 TrL SfTt4F lo

O.tr, Crook Nrl or Orerotattf.g SoH..

D....oaatad, Codt A-tydo DTrn.-.s BI 16445414K, R,. 0 A4ppestLr D. P..gt 1 o 15 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousand. of 200S3 iollars) 4.g-&

ILRW NRC Spot.Ifl S4 PoA.d 81a1 Val Bol-l UI",t j0 Adty D-R.ol o Pk.0 g

Tnt.opog Prmobssl 0topol

0th, T.

T88Ue.T.t UM&-q-M R

tkoatso1Ata V

sa8dC.C GTCC Pwacd C.

Co IndAlot o

Co.t Cost Costo Csts Coo Co Coal.

Coot lCoats Coa.

Co ab Co Co. Foa Ca. Foa C. Foa C..FCa C. Foat wt.. L Mbc ohoo h~s..

Tulinr B&I SYsto C hoft 4b1.&I T02

• bd 8.2 Tr2

• b18.4 TFO 451.60 TG2

• b168 5TH2

• b 168 TKA 0A.sr TL2 b,1ss aTMA 4b 1.6.9 TN2 4b.1.6.s 1T02

• b18.11 TOA b.1.612 1OCR 4b51.13 TOR 4b58614 TOV

• b8.6.15 TOW

• b 1.818 TOX I TOY

• b1.6.17 TS2

• b181.&S TTA 4b1.6.1s TU2 A.VMd 0Rgf SySt C.e-f 4b.1.7.1 AY" 45.1.7.2 AYA

• b 1.7.3 AYB 51b.7.4 AYC

• b 1.7.5 AYE 4b 1.7.8 AZA 4b1.r.e AZA

• b l.7.8 AZC 4b.1.7.9 ArD 4hI.t11 AZE

• 51.7.10 A26 45It712 AZI 4b51.7 TtM.

t..o8.oo SytotC.'oos

b. 1 &1 BAA 4b.182

BA

• b 1.8 BOA 184 COAA 4b.8.8 DAC 4&t5 8.

DGB Ab.1s8 DOT 4b1.&89 DPII 4b.1.810 DWF b 1.8.11 FP 4b51.8.12 GAA1OCA 4bJ.18 INTAKE STRUCTURE 4b.18.14 mAA

• b1.8.S5 MBA Ab.1.8.18 MBSIMBT Atli17 MS

• b.1 s t NMB ROOF 451.6.19 Oa 4b1.8.20 PTO

• b 1.8 21 RSFROOF

• b 1.8 22 UYARD 4b1.8.23 WAA 40 0

1 32 222 9

22 780 18 o

o7 all

• 31 7

¶ 640 64 2

2 42 20 42 e

2 72 21 4

10 359 110 09 1

2 82 40 2

4 127 4

1 2

70 13 0

6 76 2

8 207 19 0

0 I0 127 4

313 41 1

2 73 127 2

S 1M0

.778 Ud 104 3.828 le 21 01 17 70

• 12 1.1 1 0 21 277 1

4 129 0

1 4l 0

1 22 t

2 82 0

8 1

3 0

8 0

0 1

24 0

14 474 Is B

87 177 120 1.209 4

37 37 128 937 8T7 177 1.154 1.1U4 27 27 23 3

80 18I 22 128 1¶3 110 700 no0 I8 137 2a 172 12 23 224 224 22 144 144 5

20 20 51 342 342

8.

545 545 21 138 138 58 381 S8o 1o007 86800 48.2 a

274 274 12 78 re 8

50 I0 20 141

¶81 8

33 32 17 107 107 0

15 15 32

¶98 18 4

22 22 4

21 21 4

22 22

¶0 so 80 Is 1.037 1.037 75 488 498 43 291 291 2

12 12 1u4 1.182 1.¶82 18 82 82 41 247 247 B

85 2

12 10 T7 2

1I 14 104 2

18 21 183 40 251 2SI 14 83 83 8

42 42 4

31 2

10 22 240 9

30 7

543 42 408 2.250 2.250 43 257 257 390 1056 7.914 74.

520 119 RIO IN-4.447

.014 1 892 931 58 2.ssr

. 124 2.s87 895 2,096 1327 448 119 1 598 512 2a7 1.012 103 48.

1.145 70 090 343 2.908 2.183 27 7.828

.378 1.230 0

12 n7 104 18 83 1.8 413 311 10 10 1

4 1*

17

.25 1T507 10.800 N01 39*

21.743 4.842 8.106 300 307170 3.70 221.303 6.83 2.998 348 31.82a 1.AO 30 3

s.37 5

¶80.585 4.74*

2m73 41.172 1.302 8.8079 1.0 3

370 2"5 103.80 1.828 5

0.052 423 107 2 2ts4 38.008 921 8.13 2.827 1.833.091 39.193 4.6.812 2.120 20.TT5 483 10.8ez 43 41.078 1.124 4.199 375 2,.78 829 1.838 190 48.00s 1.547 3.03 287

2.

2 2762 233 13.938 473 238.198 8.315 110.031 3n27 ssM.es 1.403 1.002 187 317.88 7.00 MM¶2 1.004

9.

4.940 2.302 1 277 223 359 2.013 30 5965.0 1.918 18 77s 7r5 4.271 070 430 204 413

.9187 T707 463 210282 21.728 4.8e03 2.491 172 3

7 235 64 2

0 176 T7

.2 341 7

I8 833

• 4 o

1 30 103 1

0 998 08 1

sT8 18 0

18 1-2 8T 1

3 1195 35 0

1 33 20 0

0 B

27.

12 21 30 21 0

0 14 1.324 8

14 4*8 813 1

2 W7 TLr2.%-r.. fe.

oytter Crow MNorel t rno-ost Ritetoer

Iloeb, sfo.Ilg Cnd A.o.ydo D-.E.I Elt,143SAK R-. 0 AppsdLv D, Pofe 12 o*'IS Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

I

^

0-.'

LLRW NRC Sp. Fs 84i Coo...

B-1 VoN.t BoJ I 01,447m Ons R..o PwA.ging Tm.pol P-ng DMapose Othe Td Totdi 16Tts Li.. Ts-M.s69..M Restonttd.

Vod-0 CO...A Cla.s B C... C GTCC P--d.

Crft Co.of CosC Coot Cests Cods Costs C

Co Cool.

6041..

V Coot.

Coos Cot

- Costs Cs. Feet Co. Fos Co. Pod Co. Cod Cs. Foet 0

4b1.

Mo n

hou oboo I

I tOCit DYoV epo wwso-s syste., Cftlv 010 fcolr'od 4,1.8 24 MS 4*t1.825 YAROAREAS

• b.l.8.25 YDAIVFAIYLA

• b1, 8 04Td 4t1,.9 S

1dbt.n hg vW fds-g b-*-s son d She 1e'","

• t1 1.10.1 N4,, Rbot 85*50.

5~04 Roosi

,,1.10.2 C01 Ros li 5

. lSyw.

Rt lb I10.R903 1,8 uAo-:Sy9,4sb 4b 1.10* Tw.4 0B4g. Sy.s R lb 1.10.5 A

_s dOtt

.Obo 4b.1.10.6 00y

.bO=

41,1.10.7 Dry-.8.4- 0. Ro-st 41, I.108 ttRW S

0

.0.Dow 4b.l.10.9 MWt.oos 8.1"g Dcons

• b.1.10.10 Now Rodoote 9*

. Os-4bAl10.10I1O1 RsBtosg.W Stcsgmbo, 4b.1 1012 R0.Tovs Reo-.i

• b l 10.13 RoseBLA*g.1t91. boDs 4b1 1 10.14 R

_tto 901Ag 23F. bDom 4bl.10.15 R.

lBdbn 51.00 41,1.00 R

80o04o 75ft

oos, 4"'.1.0.17 Roose 5&Afogift. 0De" 4b,1.10A18 SIdEtt^oost Tone Rote-a A Ds, 4b I.10.19 Tbi-u&09 0.

o Da Ab. 1. 1020 TbW* B 9o6 23f. DOtO, 4b 10.21 T4bs S o

h4e6f ota, Ab,1.10o22 C dt So*.

i 0

• b,1.1023 R""009814bvg l19f.-ow.

Abt1.10 Tdaol 4b.1 S,4..

W Pdod 4b Aoy Coo P.40 4b Axdi Coot.

b Z21 Isrsi M-o T.o.

41,2 SLbW4 P.4 4b Ad*4doW Cto P04.44,b Cdlsl Cots 4b11 l0 l

"O"t 4b0l.2 Dhlosd oaudidoel d4s ft-doos whion

• b,3 4 gs i..o Ec0>

w4n ostdw 41,3 s.tO Pedd 41, CoF0.M Cot.

13 241 I

3271 21 2

04 t.947 2

1s 34 27r 1

4 4

1,027 4.325 5.249 240 1.312 1.312 879 l

5 142 25 a-x3 1

2 4

e 283 90

.1 491 1.4 1.448 848 30 7

27 3

7 27 3

33 1X 3 21 1.942 9`9 4

23 132 22 1s sO 7

17 as a

24 3

12 48 5

72 161 II 50 217 21 33 103s 1

20 7n 70 0.039 110 302 6

4.008 4695 1.00 40e7 16.616 1944 24 1

342 124 411 601 3

1 41 11 el 8l 4

60 s8 go 90 s7 919 31 1.668 e66 4

4 50 35 167 15T 9

269 7r4 4.09 4.09 SO 1.787 104 la2s4 8.073 ss 2

1 19 n92 2

33 19 92 92 14 19 214 129 18 68M SS 12 s8T 317 1.042 1.62 75 2.649 229 1.8s 7.599 T799 10 I6 988 9e 53 036 4

70 1

197 197 5

76 46 218 219 2

2 18 70s 7r 3

s 33 158 150 8

1134 112 Sol 501 1s 92 211 1

77 707 12 90 laI d

589 sa9 e

94 ss 202 242 bS1 10.420 2.*

207 002M75 10275 6

124 S1 2U 1.164 1.164 1.14 4.946 17.170 8.544 4.l06 4zl21 10 279 19 1.o76 2.093 a00 99 e

1819 e

• 05 e48

.194 13,738 Woe.10 601 213s x33 3

328 35 zl 29 l 2

& 179 Z*032 911 ro700 81 261 58 1.339 1.144 2.069 1.109 1.0?0 944 4108200

• ,13 442 I"

18 107.1982 1.211 228.175 174.750 w30

.. 499 783 30 978.424 65.37 o

80203 21,839 32,18 1.8IS 40.1784 53 64.0 so

. 919.3so 5.447 7.140 1236 IM.817 6.202

9.

, 1.620 47.81 2 330 891 2

e3

.78o 68s 222101 4207 882.850 4.7*8 1.410.M 60.082 171.870 3.192

• 70

.017 1.427

. -70.09 1.82 24.136 560 09767 1.148 133.870 4626 251.969 0 240 200.663 3855 94.413 1:86F

, 109,9M0 6.020 T107.24s 14.5T7 18.103.570 18O.725 24.381,130

• e6.360 1.636 18.22 22.008 1s.339 81.325 90,112

• 18 6

¶2 23 1203 24 1.9239 1.929 1.409

-18 6

12 zx233 1.203 288 1.92 I.939 1,49 r107s59 2.964 2.500 I

107.8 2s6 2te60 43 119 43 309 162 208 1.478 so 23 037 96 221 230 037 1.574 439 2.328 2.326 48 327 367 114 830 830 Mo0 3.1521 1.529 Z2.22 1I

• 8,002 17

,o000 274 2252

-32,070 124 29 0

303.007 r

ns0 06 TIn.q,,,iow, ise.

Oyot r Ctw N 1rm, tr-tssis ff.c -..

12.eossos

-l..Ios. Cft A..oafy.

D-.0t.1 FIB&7S5450S Rf". O Apptsix D. Nesw 13 of 15 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (housands of 2003 Mhlars)

AdiO6 0D1.84" LLRW hRC Spat F-s S.

p Bot VbVoas sI0.14.

I D e_

R-dl P-aoba Tnsapost Prssitsg DI."po Otht-T.d4 Tol

... T U0 d0 W

Rst..to VkI-iI Cbs. A Cbs. S Cl-. C GTCC P~s d Cm" Cov8"a

_ C T

C V

I v

C eh

-v e_*h

-. ts v

l v

~

-zr c-r

. -r z

c-

.r c.,.

W t. r4 l

-- n F

vvl^_

I Fvcs Adlv* D

---

-_ -_ff

-_iif-

_v_-

wz-

-vz-

__v

__v

_vvow

__o

_vw v

F r_

_w v

v w_

_lar P.d.d Lb P.4odtpeooeM Costs

• b 4.1 D-an

&6 4b.4.2 h-oI, 4b.4.3 P

op" ta11 4b 4 4 tl viih pI s a4,f s

• b 4.5 Ha.y OwA.."

t W

• bA4.6 D

hO M

of DAW 9sd.t 4b4.

Pt.4 d-V0gyf b.Ld 4b.48 NRC s_

4b4.9 SR* OSICcost 4b 410 ROs& t, P S., Eq I

4b4.11 SaooY Stff Coo Lb 4.12 DOC Staff Cost 4b4.123 Ul, Sbtff Cost 4.4 S&6oMW PsL 4b Pftf"p&4 Cost 4b.0 TOTAL PERICO 4b COST PERIOO 4L. t ok s

T u.bs.a Po 4L Dsod Do fst so*V MOW 4L.1.1 OR1SE m b0 a

.s L 1.2 T

vsn*L 1-ss 441 3.bblWl Prtd L* Ad,*y Costs P~

4 LA~ddfi Cost Le 2 S&ktotM P.od 4*

ALLr-W Cos.

P. 4L CdaftsW CotS A

t3.1 DOC stafftresocaet7i-L4 3 SL,6a P.,4 4# Colata C-ot P.-10 LO P.,I4OoDfto.nl Cot La 4.1 b,5L50 La 4 2 Pp to.s" 4L...3 Heefth oPysOM a'4 4L4 4 DIblr4 of DAW glMd 4 4.5 Pt py bdsbgot 4.4.6 NRC Pen LOL.4.

SOO O SM Coa 4L.4 t S

otv S"aff Cosd 4L.4.9 DOC Staf" CtAs 4L4.10 Ufty Sft Cost 4e 4 5.1w Pvo La P 4L-Do Cos eo.0 TOTAL PERIOO 4L COST PERIOD 4 TOTALtS 781 195 9T7 977 1.049 104

.144 1,I44 I..

1,4 145 1.593 1.59 1.e82

• 21 2.103 2.103 2.2.2 341 2.613 2.613 64 19 Lit 114 282 625

.07 76 Su4 54 r*26 63 e91 691

.. 2 54 416 416 821 76 60o 600

-9 0.400 224 1.714 1,714 11.453 t.718 13.171 13.17 1994t 2.992 22.990 22.wO0 70l 3.,ss 64 19 41 37.30 6.525 49.17* 3 49*,1

.8.11 21.07t 22M 1.697 16.629 24.72t 28.601 22.752 121,903 132,811 1.929 7, 6 14.0 1.7 9. 5 7. 6 1. 2 7.184 143,653 1,TS9 06 67 1.2 1 2 3.1

. 0 2.2 0 2. 9.1 0 4 0.6 0 6.2 110 s11 35 1SO 150 35 150 1SO

4. 72 1.371 0.943 5.54 4.572 1371 5.943

.943 98.444 9 8.

.0 07 1.097 164 1.2e1 1.261 164 1291 1.26I 1*

04 9 04 091 099

.'7 a29 829 494 116 0o 5e0 4

17 5

27 27 94 14 106 106 327 23 306 359 s19 28 2t5 216 232 31 247 247 4.090 614 4.704 4.704 5.019 753 0.772 5.m 494 4

1 17 11.244 1.72 13,457 13.407 494 4

1 17 17.026 3.297 20.811 20.811 5,st 37.134 7.321 3.136 35.912 42.919 94.09 47,402 2MA.eSS 2z3.s6s 1.929

4. 4

.57 6. 3 6.10 636 20 6.100 56.519 1L6.53 1.37 423.177 214.712 2.822 207 411 2S.607.2so 737.629 9.230.253 rLr.Sai.

• l..

l

Oy.1-v C-ok N-l",

o o~i~Stl.

Dvsd.oigCost Analysto DoApp-di* D. Pg541. Rev.

Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) 08-SO.

U.8W NRC SPoot Foot S..

Prossod B-Io~ Vo....

8oool WUl1p ood AdioDoo.I.

Reorosot Po*.t.9.

T.o-pod P-"

Disposdl 01 Tdot 7Ttal E. 7..,.

Ms p... t R.-t Vol.e.

Chs A Cl.

B Cl... C CTCC 9orsad.

Cnft Cotora l

kd.

AtC.thD Coot coots C-oo Coos Costs Costs cost coast Co.t.

Coot.

Coot C.. Foot C..F.ot Ce rFt Cv.F P5.t Wt.L...

Mot.

Usot,o PERIDD lb. Smts tI t Rtosf C).

§8os.4R ftOhlro SR.5 B.Mq0s 51,11.1.1 Stas.wdljo ssTW.oot. Ro.ooet 5 Cos.

Bh.1.1.

Al.vF 0tdoOf G5.t. Bg 5.14 C*b stbs 4.18 511.1.5 Glob S50.

SbA.1..7 OomsiosWmatsFodofy 511 1.1.8 Fashb wast, P."o Ho~s R1,1.1..10 IHoa 'I So.4. Ho.

Mb1.1.11 b-.5s528.

Wb.l..12 4..L-os 84451 Ston" S&1.1..13 Msdotb SWo ObIXIAI kss~toalw -SBVddo

51. II' 17 tSaOatooo NM 8,..

Sb 1.1.21 Old.8.18R 5b.1.1.2144 R-b

,dost.5k, Sbt12PSIV110 o

8.ol*

5b.1.1.28 4 ftEwg.sl 9,dto 5b.t.1.27 7T.* Pft.A Iktla& Y*,

5bht.1.28 T1wbI B."41 511.1.1.2 T~ot.00ol 3 St. C108804 Acboo 5bl 12 Ro-a. 8.1804 so. 1.3 Gd. & st.docwoaoe$

5b111.4 oo.~oR sh1

=~too Polt bVoo ot PeeM 1,4S AMNIboss Coot.

Sb 2.1 Co-ost Co.1os Sb 22 ISFStl t.Rtttomdo.

Sb.2 S~ktot Potto Sb Ad~Alot coasts Potlod Sb, Cot.tto costs 5b 3.1 5.AW s.002 lbS S.44Ot Pottod Sb, Cotottd Cost 824 441 241 28 91 ll51 10 I4 22 383 304 I??

82 275 692 304t 480 214 318

• 27 41,187 12 250 3.428 457 14.211

• 124 847 66 so?

28 277 4

32 14 105 17 133 1

4 3

21 8

27 s7 440 46 210 27 203 12 95 41 218 104 796 48 349 72 552 1

9 32 248 54 415 2t 180 4

31 824 4.781 2

14 38 28 105 803 818 3.954 1l 468 Z132 168.34 s47 s47 507 o77 03 105 133 II

.17 440 203 218 798 249 552 415 231 4.781 14 298 80 3.9U 488 1

8.38 I

2.421-8.313

3. 488 431 1-197 1.723 Its 330 54 578 83.858 4.818 3.021 z127

.807 3 148 8.45 2.120 8z4s 83.4a8 9201

,4O 81.425 5.000 208.428 8.880 345 21 213 430 5

187 27 11

?

117 II

-38 38 I.02 7.8e2 7.82 82 327 3s7 18 124 134 2203 24.556 1.842 23.474 10.758 1.453, 1.280 28.848 1.580 8s 49 4

35 2a 288 10o 7

2e8 499 2.857 1.439 160 4.295 18o 182

-2 24 57 187 24 1ST 187 rra Son{ o. io.

0ftrr Crook Ntrea, rtetIH.j St.Ho.

Drrlia a-foa C-t A.t.".

D-WRI RL'1485Il6.S, Re. 6)

App-tie D, Poe. IS r.IS5 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) olt.54`

LLRW NRC Sp.

Fwt S..

PFo..o B-1 Va.k Buarl I UJ101 ad Ad" Dc R-l Prgb9 T.a-rpadt Pror.Iq DOSIAl Ottw Twt Total LtiT.a M.Tapnn ft-baSoA Vd.1 CI... A CI-B Cta., C GTCC P.--d Cet C,..a I k..

Abl D.

Coa C

C-e..O Chl Colh Ca

CCal, CotC C Chta Co-.

Ceoat Co-%

Ch,,.

C

.. F.e F._M Cr.Fo C., Pa etLb..

4anom M,.nt.oaI P.t s P..d-0..MM Cat.

Sb.4.1 FdWsc 5b *2 PmaOy aoa 5b.4 3 Ha-Yqiw

p.

ata 5b.4.4 PlaN a In b0,00 5b.4.5 Stl O8A Cou 5b.48 StAv SW Corn Sb.4.7 DOC staff Cost 5b 4 8 Usty StaR Ceoa 3b.4 d4)lpa 00 o

Coat, 5b.0 TOTAL PERtOD so COST PE00o0 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOLt.tSMOSS 882 88 971 971 1.52 151 1r08 I.r08 3.327 9

409 3.82 3.520

.7 r

s 112 112 3

• 5

44.

t8 N

a 479 72 551 011 29'180 6,510 nr 8r

.8 9.

.1 77 747-7.401 Is00.20 40 3.49 511 3.020 3.M20 4800 3.22 11318 Z3.75 19.020 19.020 176.*0s 25.352 5

1*

11471 Sr.02 ast0o 1.02 260 41186 2.964 178.300 25.352 5

1471t 1702 4.530 1.002 268 4161 22..964 178.t00 12.632 27.054 7.554 3.645 38.144 45.618 3.877 90.745 t6.20 414KtA3 175.5t1 45,148 462227 24t.496 s.888 267 411 41.125.80 122024 4,122.036 TOTAL COST TO DECOMMttSSON WITH I170.% CONTINGENCY:

t6352r70 tnabd.

2003 4066d TOTAL NRC LICeNsE TRMIONATION COST MS 5S0% 04 0414.593 It.aads 20et do8 n SPENT FUEL MANAGE6ENT COST 1 27.63% OR-0175.03 559 S.

of 20d 3 do!.e N.NJCNUCLAR DEMOLmTION COST IS.111% OR:

0451140 tto.ode of 2003 d40..

rOTAL PRIMARY SITE RADWASTE VOLUME BURIED 44.11 cublc Fat oTAL SECONDARY SIT RADWASTE VOLUME SURIED 203,616 cubic Foot oTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED 411 cble Fact OTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED:

22.65t loI.

OTAL CRAFT LABOR REOtREMONTS:

1.22034 r

_.6 Eld Notec

s. kbftl 60l Oft w a.r d

b.

=c g

S. h.St0 Itha Ihh Ball llun O-t 5 ba M noar a C e0 cmuk",ta

. N.ta.

oa oa-k Th2 Sa,Crm. M.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 AppendixE, Page 1 of 16 I,

APPENDIX E DETAILED COST ANALYSES SAFSTOR TLG Services, Inc.

Oof.,_ CW.& NsClea, G,.-a.f~fqt.sHSs_~

N'asloosgCool A..olsI.

D-.o-.f

£l&1S.0.435t6 Rev. a App.-di F., Poe.2 rig Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thouoands of 2003 Dollars) o0040.

LLRW NRC SepM FPW St.

PFrd a_.Iu oVd..

a-Lftl uIy.nt At

o.

Ra-PasO t Topott Plossslsq OIspes I Ott-Totul Tota U. Ta V

.w.*

R.

Vok CI A

Cl." 9 CLoss C GTCC P.o--d cft Coodoo 0d..

A so" Drbe Cosl coat C

Co Cos coas Cota Cot Costs Coot eCoss C.oss Co Cos ts C.. Pt Ct.F-t

c..6 Co. Pt Ce. ost wrb..

Uas...

Mht PERIOD 1..- Shtsdoos ftttgtt Trasotto P.1041is 0.6 Ac01015o

• . ost,M 181.

SAFSTOR SUa choctsdratts.. Mo 11.2' INo..

05~4.y...~ols.

01 101.3 Ns adasooftn0a OIO1pMOOO6.1f 18.1.4 Rotoos to*S 0ts 'a.4 18.1.5 MWsaleoo-d Pototsos 0sS.o&.

I.oll.

Dod..o.s p0. ays.4 £ pt~os 0.a8ls 18.1.7 Pow a. Old..

GL PSDAR 18.1.6 R,'t..oP1Is dog, a pams 1.1.9 Powbos dKt84.d suraivy 18.1.10 5,6016.bY-p.s40d k.."n, 18.11.1 I

EM po 4

d 4.8Vfo 1.1.12 D.Wa~d by-54.dM kVst"e 18.1.14 PoflooSERos,IEA 18.1.15 P5,0.0 Ss-tSwfdte Comst

• Adoty Spr.W"o 1.1.1611.1 Pwoaw p18.*4I, ac~ms..oSArSTOR 10.1.16.2 PI"

yoo, 1.1.163 P0.4 0waa

&c,d IAft1*19 1.1.16.4 Wast. masagooto 18..15 Fa.CfW.1 7 0 0 eon.V O01080 Wo.5 P.sodooo 10.71P1.4 "yttt 18117 acity too.."A d--"ss 18.1.17 Uotm tIl Pot.,.

r-ot p

.o syat..

18-1.20 DOoIn A yNMSSS 1.121 dtis4e.wtqogt oo,.tsoold 5¶5I~o 11 SbmwtoPodOla8Ac"5yOt Pottodl18Coto.01Cost.

183.1I Sp.4 P.84 CoPkal 804 Ttasl to 183 SMtotal Pettod 18 Coaotoao Coats P0404 1. Po.Iodm-Oood.. Cools 1.4.1 b3He.M..

o 1.41 4 0 9-Ytoo.-eO t

18 4.5 Opottoo f 0 DAWgettd

1. I0 E

-ooas Pl-ftoFg 1.9 sla otam (Cost 18.4.10 psw oot PdooOaU 184.11 ISFSI op"*

t o 6 Co$t.

184.12 Saatysta~lff cms 18..4.13 LIMT S180R Cod 18 4 S~ktotiP840418P.W04.0ep4040.4Cost 18.0 TOTAL. PERM1.01 COST 292 97 ISO 97 75 75 112 75 232

• 375 312

• 234 150.ss 1.214 9

90 179 7

tt 350 3t0 IS 112 112 W.

22 172 1n is 112 112 11 M

as II 86 Be I7 29 129 It t

4 t

6 tS 2t7 261 50 431 431 515 24 424 47 359 319 3s 269 269 22 17 172 22 1n 172 162 1.396 1.396 1..60 1.300

• .000 6030 1.600

,000 tsoo 5.030

.920

• .167 3.120 t2000 16070 16207 1 t0 2.383 100 13 102 102 13 103 103 27 209 205 I

9 a

2.980 491 3.471 3.471 10.307 1.546 1t.t53 10.307 8.546 Yt S3 11.013 11.53 221 t2t 2tt 50s 0so 5

1 8

1 O

I 1.734 172n 1.807 8.907

• 55 2i7t 27t 43 331 331 23 6

35 35 625 94 71, 719 371 37 406 406 101 10 111 200 37 2t7 207 g 6 145 1.113 71 11 6

68 145 1.114

.114 24422 3663 2t.060 2t.06 23 29.010 4.421 34.470 33.140 23

• 2.79t 6.45 49.794 3t,635 III 1.113 62 1.306 13.159 404

.103 99 6493 103 99 6921 404 99 46.343 404

.103 4.233 TL.0 9.-i-a C.e

O,'.fr CIow N-s-r-,~tigqftfis~..

Dw-osof SM1&4SS.,6O ll.-' I Appn.d.

Par. 3t1 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands cr2003 Dollars) r SLO

_~t S5fl OUt

._t_

rmcosos_ _a

_ 50._._ 0000505 5.511.

11 0 IAdNR0Y D s.-

5.n,.,

PoobostgM Tosopot Poososto Disoosa Otts Total Toosi LI. Ton~t M.osg.o.wd4 S stois Volkts Cloo. A Cu. S V Cb. C GTCC P -oss d C ost Cs= o

-m t

C -.

e t ro-cost-C -st Eos boI C ost c ost.

c Iot cost C.. F..t C.. Foot C.. FMo C.. F."8 Co. Foot WI.. Lbs.

MU n.. b5 l sobot I bd*t A

O"be PERIOD lb.- SAFSTOR Lbftd DECON AotW*It" Pe80 lb od Deowo."ssto.*.gAc~Oft6 1 1 1 2

O lId R so ss-

t.

. 4 0. S s to R m o l lb.I.1.3

&Vgl ftd4 0R60n,. D -ou 16.1.1A D 17568. L b,. Rm o,.

16.1.15 RBO0.T00.R -n S.

lb.1.1.

05.Roo, B.Afrg.191t. Cocos Ib.1l.1.7 OtacbEA,4"s Ttffl ft. Rooton 5 Otto IbAl. 5 TtobA" bidog ont. D -

lb0..1 Totals lb1l SstAo0IMP.to lbAcdstyC~ft5 Pb2.1

$Pb AM.al Cost lb.2 Sftottifot PIbld6*.M01t5 P.44lb CobO~d Const lb.3.1 De o lt, b o lb.3 2 Ptocosst M -tos lb. 33 S o ul Wa s.11 0 5 W.34 SF0.4 FsotCM*M. VA Ttod0.

lb,3 Sb.W Pt.,i ootd lb Co1,ot.Ws COOSt lb 4.1 D eco sts4VIo l b d j 1 0.

o t.

lb '.3 P l ptot tone lb.:45S H -ss W lpsss. toos lbA4 5 O4posOfo DAW q..slW lb 4.7 P t.i os. y b5149 lb5.15 NRC Foss lb.A.9 EntoogeCV PIs.-tsg Foeil 15.4.1 S F5.1 FOU P od OSM lb.4.12 ISF11 OPMO.5t Costs lb 4.I3 S -ooty 5109 Cost lb.4

= 4o=tliP10 b Pet1D..p.t4t4 Cost.

lb0 TOTML PERIOO lb COST PERIOD IC

• Plpsostaft.*

ft SAFSTOR Do-s-ny P. 4 0 41, Oc sol D -o o 4 s o 4 0 O o 1 0 1.1 0 5 0...

o od t

• t, o too s-t o s 10.12 bol S o

-ob sO P. 5.. " s o.L VoW 1 I.13 hftfttstsst y pfim.4ottS O y 10..4 140.00 hs.541g -

nto 10.15 F Mps. 55.4A, I0td.o,t ptotl 1ICA ~

loo P.I4d 1c Aoc"y Costs 2

1.629 tlU

• 2 5

341 4.210 4210 1

3 3

814 2.443 2.U3 1.092 3.275 3.27 3

5 8

21 63 63 4

12 12 t 7 0 III lii 210M

.15 "i1s 21M 6.315 6.315 I

37 32 41 32 453 109 912 151 9752 83.995 83,9 9

8.115 121 0.332 9.332 6.111 1.217 9.332 9.332 828 688 is 1 1

. 1 1 7 1 6e 824 68 e5 175 735 7 1 311 73 1

0 735 383 1

0 5.770 451 o7 176 409 38 448 94 m

723 734 314 1.485 1.465 10 7o T8 2077 387 2.963 734 2577 801 s248 2.285 1U4 l19 919 437 44 4*1

• 81 527 53 579 575 78 388 588 11 U4 84 7

2 10 10 158 24 181 181 94 9

153 103 25 3

28 63 9

72 72 244 37 281 16 2

21 244 3T 281 281 4.538 60 S.216

• .218 7

6.345 1.172 8644 8.315 740 17.037 5292 29,539 26.24?

2.963 2.9.3 29 281 21 329 3292 1.3 1 0.9 2 9 5 1348 169.933 265 17 2.33 29 14.651 72'.417 2.33 29 872 117 1.349 I.272 84.29 97 733 44 m

61 470 470 S

42 42 220 953 913 7

50 50 293 1.919 1"15 3.001 700 19,098 583 22.79S S83 7 I.nfres, Ine.

Ow,, Cr-h Nrel.. Aoofyle 17Z 1 "lt'o A~sey-f Doe.wr.1 El6.14Z55

.S, Rar. O App.odb. A ren 4 ofl6 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dottors) 04 LLRW NRC Sponl Fo SW P e.-.4 r.n. Vd.

hvo U.t. 0e AtWIRY

0.

ft ld Pd.tlgtI Tr nwopo Pt voolnq Oepord Otiw Told Tobl tIe T.1.

U n

R ee Volumo C

A Cl--. a cI.

C cTCC Precee od Crlt Ceneor kb..

AeO I.d.

Cot Cool Co.

Coot.

Coton Coos Cootl Coot Cot.

Cool.

Co-t.

Cee C. Foot C.. F.._

C.. Fo F_- C.. Fo W9t.,

1 W.ntl.

Mot Pedod IC Cda.l" Coots 1.3.1 Pn.-r t.Aid oto 1c32 SMl odt Ie 553 Spoo Funl Co" or4 Trond 1c3 Sobt P.

ICColttoCosts PeW0 lC P eoto-prot Coos 16c4.1 h-Cs Ic 4.2 Pto tan, lcJ.3 HtlM p0qsks s.4 lc,4 4 H1. 7."

.or.t lc4.5 Momsd Of DAW gotd ce4.6 Pllln ay bg lcA.

NRC to_

1C.4.8 Efw tooy Pttsg Fo 10.49 MIS OIM Cod lC 4.10 Spot Fo Pod OIM 1c4.11 ISFSI OpoStp Coot 16.6.12 Soa9Y Staff C."

Ic 4.13 UV" Sld Cost 1e4

&6tobl P"d IC Pd. Dopeo t Cwoo lc.0 TOTAL PERICO 1 tCOST PERIOD 1 TOTALS PERIOD 2.

SAFsTOR OtttonY t Wdt Spol F.W Sos.

Potld 2. D1.d.o s

log AC#tAt 2a.1.1 Out" MloWl0o 201.2

-t st t

-M 2 1.3 Pr poctr.pols

20. 14 sit*o wol 0K 22.1 5 M*"o-c qAps s~

2a.1 St&to P.,oW 20 ACMI Cost P.kd 20 Ctdboo Coot 203.1 Sp.

Fue Cap1d end TNrotfr 22.3

&6tolw P~t 20 C dlto Cos PtW 20 P od.ODodoM Cogs 204.1 twst 20 4 2 P.opy ts.o" 204.3 Hot.h psy.s Moppn 2 44 Dio d

olo(CAW td 20.4 S PLopt meogy t.0t0 20.*6 NRC Fo-

2.

r Eff"- PIMM F-f 2a 4.8 S8* OIM Co'a 2.4. 9 Spo Co Fot Pod OCM 2 4.10 ISFSI Opog Cots 2.4.11 S-.ky Sto C0o6 20.4.12 ULfly StoldCod 204

• sM Podo 20 P04.od PodW Cots 2&.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2. COST 219 73 198 3

219 3

7 196 72-

.I

.0 219

.54 74 19.

5.966 1.60 106 373 613 2.

61 2.577 432 521 156 93 25 62 241 a1 21 4.431 6

.221 819 9.574 1.502 69409 349 1.650 1.650 0

4 4

387 2.96S 736 4*617 1,654 43 475 475 52 573 573 31 16 1se 11 83 83 2

9 9

23 17n 179 9

102 102 3

28 9

72 72 M

276 3

20 36 278 278 665 0.006 5.096 923 7.46s 7.023 1.953 13.481 10.192 13.710 92.814 o.074 23 170 75 B79 go 754 1508 19.882 296 2.9 2 91 2

2'.e 150 Io

19. S2 2Ms 26 27 20 226 328 19.740 lot101 0

1.

8 101 1.0 2

2.5 2.020

.25 14.690 71.63

• 2.020 26 96.320 191.902 23.1 1

.0 372.27 107.506 656.45 152 503 655 170 579 796 3.539 0.406 4.449

.36, 039

5. 406 4.4 41445 414A4 221 221 221 I1s

.4 1

4 19 4

3.361 4.00

.92 1.677 1.361 404 1.00 3,875 294 1.2.127

'~no 93 34.028 93 70.723 336 3.697 400 4*00 05 276 26 142 282 Z.15 136 1.497 40 444 150 1,100

1. 61

• 4#.6 43 327 315 2.44S 2.361 18.150 4*729 39 094 10.233 81.293 3.697

4. 450 27r 142 2.1 58 i.457 444 1.150 4.416 327 2.446 18.100 29.084 81293 1.9 1.619 1.4

• 32.434 357 129.403 2 2.109 32.4'34 397 3471.511 3Z434 397 37I.S1 Ti

.Gsl-t-Ire.

O,.te. Cwk.Ve1sr r--.eqtfi..gSa,.

feobomiCoot Aealysla Dst.aoot EISI4SS.004 Re.. 0 Appe-&l. E Page S of 19 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of2002 Dollars)

PER0020 lb SAFSTOR Do,,,,amy Rht Dry, Spent NOo Steg..

Petod 2b Deed D--*W4O 0 AC4.I0 lb1,'.1 Oble,11 bspecti0 26.'1 2 S-.,-aW~o. gwke.-,oo a"oo 29.1:3 Pta,0.

26,.14 OsOOestef."tW 2b1 I5 MAk0004-0 530985 2b.1

&5tk6tW P.4d lb AdoIV Coots P.00 lb, Cattttd Cost.

2b.3.1 Sp.4 NM. CapWd.t Tm,fwol 2b.3 Sblota Ptttod 2b Cob.A.W Coats P.tl2b Pb&Od-toodto Costs 2..1) teass-eo 29.4.2 Pepett ta-o 2b. 4.3 H..tO pt98e oe 2b.41.41 DI10osatof AW ot-sted 6.15 PtRsr. W t.9 balgo 2,6 NRC Fss

26. Et.wposny Platoat Fe" 2b.468 S" 20 0MCM~

2b.4.9 tSFS1 sooo Coots 2b.4.10 S800^ Staff Cost 2bA1 U.I VftSt.R Cod 29 4 Sbbtstl P.W0 lb P ~d4).O.6.o4.

Coist 29.0 TOTAL PERIM0 lb COST PERIM0 2.. SAFSTOR Do,-.oncy wfttot Spool Foot Sto.."

Paftod2c0060.oooo,4ooto.4 AcO.40.

20.1.

O-n.6i 0 he-eodo 20.1I.2 S

-nisnoo o

-oood ae" 20.1.3 NraP-t 1,1 0o 2c.14 0.Oatl*.O~ tolMd 400t' 2,o1.

MLd4oAoV o aepoA 20.I S.,".ta Pette 20 Aclk cost.

Pedol 20 P404.30ooddo Costs 204.1 o...

2:.42 Ptpmaltao" 20.4.3 Ho Physict.bs 50016'5 20.4 4 DW*ooooof DAWg n9 tad 20.4 5 Ptad a.M godoot 2CAS.

NRC Fees 20.4.7 Sto cam coot 20.4 DooS-. StoW Coat 20.4.9 Utov tf camloo 20.4 R~tttPeem4 20 Petto4...pss,s Cot.

20.0 TOTAL PERIM 20 COST PERIMS 2 TOTALS Oll3i LLRVf NRG Sp..t F.

r t.

P--d

-W V d-B..I7 thlity nd Do R.

Pd9gtng Topont P-oog Dieposal Otdo Tot.1 Tbtl UL.Tst Ms R..ta-..

Vksa Ci.

A C... a CtaoC CTCC F7PM--d Cft Coder Coot Coot coo.

coot.

coot.

Cot.

Cot.

Coo Coot.

Csts Costs Coot.

C..

eFt C. Foot C.. Foo C. Foo C,. Fo WI. Lb,.

M.nh-W1to.

I 04 1.54 2.167 6.200 6.200 75 7sn 230 1.913 323 2.492 930 T.130 030 7,130 1.393 2.492 71I 0.407 gm la'"?

13.227 1.323 14.040 731 9

102 614 63 14 307

.0 409 827 124 002 4.-00 4 450 4.9n 1.33 134 1.409 307 490 36803 939 141 1.080 479 715 5.478 2336 5

M109 3

n.273 m71 63 14 807 n77 910 2.44 731 63 14 207 00121 10.800 92.106 10.447 14.040 914 409 632 4.950 1.409 1.680 5.478.

38 373 82.484 92.106

.2 107.2 1.3

-M86 90.001 S.252 107.245 1.314 779.001 5.32 107.248 1.214 77m.81l 1.39 209 1.805

.eo 4,*11 692 5.303 l.303 a0.07 901 6.907 6.907 23020 2.302 2s.322 2sm=

30657 365r 40.323 40.323 2.025 508

2. 52 2.032 170 39 851 236 1.301 1.301 2293 344 2.537 2.037 12.471 1.247 1371s 13.IS1 9.14 1,37 150.039 10.539 6.01 090 7.091 7.591 4

0712 12.70 7 97.410 I7.419 2.023 175 39 01 174.919 23.2S3 201.383 201.383 2.029 17T 39 "11 180.925 24274 206290 2082-0 2.97s 2s7 57 1251 331.779 45.8.7 391.609 208210

1.

.42 401,70

.2.2 1.3 297.236 32 1.02907 14.833 297.236 3.042 1.625.807 17.399 21.803 4-38.18 0.232 2.77.18 TL7l Se,-..

f-e.

Oya.r. CroA, N-aafrer4oi Staffs.

DoaesfI, Cost A-4oo.1 Doeeeaoa E1&.1433.004,So' 0 Aopp-dls' K. P odS eri Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

O5L5 R.W NOC

&ooet Fos S..s P---d sasI Bsn40ssO.ahII Lftfltysd Ad" Oase Raos Psoghg T"aso Paasbssog Diposal Othn Told TOtl Us.T M-9-4 R

sto Voti C

A CI-S CassC GTC a

d Caft Cotatl Ahd.

lceeb Cot Cos Costs Casts Costs Cots Costs CoI..

Cot Cotsts Costs Cost C. Fa C.. Fss -C.. Fat C. Fos C.. Fast

0ft, Wl,.

nts4..

Ma1ntsl PERIOD 2.. 6.adi..ot. St Fosing SAFSTOR Do,,-uy Paed 2. Ohio Doteem-sOriog Ar.tse 3t.1.1 Pleesn Vbf ydas-s-s-sdsrk CMs 3.12 Ras.,i.44 Ings & seasa.

31.1.3 Peosn,,n 6.48att ds starey 3.1.4 Ed tpn44d d--"-lo 34.1.5 Dstold tlayeritc mst~sy 31.1.

Defl.

-slosnt..ok 30.11.7 Pe1os-SEtS 04 EA U8. 16 Pstts-SRa-SeaCNC Cost S"od 3a.l.9 NPrswninstb Lies.. To.*...5a Pa..

30.1.10 R..". NRC alrpoosa Wk h

.44to p

Adsiy Sp~feasfoM U..111I Roeitsst pho~ £ lo May Wnytsdl 38.1.112 PtwAS.MMyle 308.1I112Resdethlhnds

25. 1I11.4 Ileado sIt,1al 3 1I.1.1 SBoOVI~l fjlde 1.111 a 6

lts ~s9htstt 321.111.7 R"1ornadosot 3S1.1118 sTwbbw

& 0,tosse 3a..1119 Posm egossssta, 31.11:110 Oro 311111Pta.t S&WK,,oss 5 8.4-50

3. 1.11.12 West.,.na.ari-31.1.11.13 FnIfty & Moc dosesor

31. 1.11 TOWa Pla-nin & Site Pneea&6Dos 38.1.12 PA.

d,.-.M"at0 e2ots

38. 1.13 Pla.SM p

.A.sV.

31.1.14 Oasip. ontr dssn-synitos 31.1.10 R6gg*'gCsn Cr41EsritO.'i 38.1 s.motd Poted 31 Ac~Ift. Costs PetdW 38 Pwb&dDM-d.0dr Costs 3.4.1 kaan 3142 P oselty tn.o 31 4.3 Ita-tO 1,11ynks ftwls 311 4 H."s astnrW.1da 3.4.

DFsposal of DAWgeas 31.46 PU.t naeaysdW

3. 4.7 NIOC Faes 34 48 sit.O&M cod

3. 4.9 Seoulity Stsff Cne So A,10 IU~l~sfwTCs-38 4 subktt Psio Ss Peto-D.OP.,otd Cools, 31.0 TOTAL PE560003. COST 07 15 112 112 Y3 52 396 398 1.300 4.D00 75 97 512 232

.37S

.7 II t 4

M6 15 112 112 84 u46 u4s 35 267 287 50 421 431 46 S30 313 1.000 1,2300 7.500 3.100 4.016

• 095 552 212

-70.5s

.75

.120 212

.120 234 340 23642

~*

1u2 2.419

.105 2.00

.92 10.270 62 635 571 47 39 333 90 612 612 n3 No 580 a

43 43 1t M6 06 1I 139 06 47 309 339 22 172 172 16 138 138 35 2M9 134 02 206 296 to 7's 9

001 3.644 3.502 27 207 207 433 2.782 2.782 16 121 121 307 2.355 2.355 14 106 106 1.541 11.817 11,470 1 9

.69 341 3,41 7,370 4.167 7.100 6.5000 600 l 1.00 1.600

.167

.Sooo 1.600 2.120 4.600 900 44.624 2.400 1.400 1.230 77550 221 288 509 20 00 00

.718 999 0

1 23 4s9 371 250 44

16. 70 S

I 23 19.629 S

I 23 2n9.04 72 700 799 100 1.099 1.099 55 276 278 43 331 331 6

35 31 70 539 S39 37 408 408 37 287 287 67 512 012 2419 18.823 18 033 2.945 23.112 23.112 4.46 34.926 34.587

~40 404 341 401 9.103 99 27.114 261234 8.103 99 288.350 8.103 99 20.00 T77 Snles. In.

O,.i., Crok Nate~eor OeooroHg Swi-4r flro.-Ud..ig Cool A..1yoi.

Dsnoott lt15S044 R-. 0 APp-odto A, Ps4. 7.ris Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

IAdly o0So R.W NRC Spo,,F.ot W.

PoosodS Vodoo.

ta 49.1

khUty, 7 0

.I Docs..

Root.-i P.48oghog T~soot P,oossto DIapose Ottoo -

Teed TlI Le Tonmt M-os9-ao Roto.tioo Vak..

Cl... A CI.

B Cl... C GTCC Peead al Clt.I Coot Co."

C-oo coot.

coot.

cooft.

. Cott.Mwg-oo.s coo.

ot.

C-tto co sts t..

oots C

.. F.

.4 Foo

.Pot Co.

F oo t

Co. Foo.

st WI.. Lbs,.

Monos ohoo-o I

-s

-O PERIOD 31,0. C.-Wot.ooaaol Ptop-6-tot Pottod 31b M04 od to4ol.

Aedolfoo Deftled WoNk Pmecodtvi; 301.1.1 Ph.d4 "

r-d X01.1.3 Ro.not." StlaoA X1..1 4 CRD otoWWsA "

3b 1.1.5 low hots ioM.atMt 2.1.1.5 IonOltbys9so4 20A117 Rood. ooo 20.1.1.

Faolfty doootd WS.1lS saawkdul5ot 2.1.1.10 R4setst 31,1111 TwLt*aoomeoooeoo 2.1.1.12 LMc"' 11"Pt-slo'sO 4,at, 2.1.1.13 R4otbt5.

3k01114 Roed"bxb"Vo 261.1 Towl 355 53 40 347

0.

30 5

340 345 101 15 116 29 r.

75 8I M

T7 11 54 Be 150 22 72 172 m

41 313 312 S0 13 103 52 9 00 15 103 103 T5 11 08 43 3 812 47 359 359 150 22 172 172 204 31 235 212 204 31 235 212 2.452 348 2.820 2.550 Z452 3

2820 2.00 dl 270

. 3

.2 252 270 4.733 41000 1.5000 2eo00 2.030 1200 1200

• .16?

2000 2n30 32.740 3740 Poeod 3b AddM-M Cools 8b.2.1 SlO hClado"t 3b.22 Doolh. on Ld M RCRA Wo.

(roo hod 20.2.3 O.

M dM n d PCS SoS RCRA Wat (

Wlod) 31b2.4 DI,111o d Load h.-y 3S2.5 A400,11 Rood.

20,2 S5btotl Pdd 20 Ad,§God Costs Polod Sb Collsto Costs 203.1 DO-od 4

31,32 DOCC st l

• Vef6 203.3 50.5 lod s 34 PIs W" MqAP-WS.

SLtt5 Ptiod Sb Coolotol Cost Pet t b P2 OD-d.d COOt 3b 4.1 Do, Wveo 3b,42 ob 20 4.3 PtY

_t.

20 4 4 Hoots phsis KVPS 3204.5 Me" OWW O -*tId 3b 2 0 Dpweot of DWAgNowd 204 7 Pt.M -o7 bWdos

20. 8 NRC F.

20.4.9 S5t O&M Cos 3b.4.10 S5 5S1ff Coot MA.4.11 DMC StlldCod so.4.12 Ly Staff Cco 3bP J

svdd 8b0 P.O Cots 3b.0 TOTAL PERID 0b COST PRIOOD 3 TOTALS 9.791 9.79?

0 58 2

I 45*

I its 3152 904 4.098 4.098 0290 01 410 515 1.820 252 1.130 1.9130 44 7

55 53

714 2.033 13.1US 13.1U 102 7M4 3.152 Iota 10.083

10.

.83 2.01

¶S1.074 27T000 1.620.500 31 22.0S0 10.103 249.515 150.230 29.050 1.193 W2.50671 150.30 428 M

1128 828 1.0!2 94 723 723 1.097 104 1.21 1281 19 140 140 143 1.100 1.100 1.C097 421 3.228 3228 It "145 19 710 2

1 2

1 5

24 24 30 0

394 394 501 50 051 051 141 7n0 757 22 l14 144 1 12 S

1 15 230 20 270 275 I8 I

20S 205 144 10 209 259 120

¶0 144 IMI 22 34 257 207

.3 1 507

3.

s4 3.890 0s7.

1.254 9.632 9.632 12 13.389 2127 16240 1

M260 3

4 50 3.0 522 34113 3

4.3 50 19.93 20 2.5 1.39 2.010.734 5.20 232.733

• 1 29.050 19.800 018.837 150.37 0

5984.33 48 11.584 3

13 2.103 n7 20.090 6.4 42.12 41.92 840 12.093 0

114 2.192 751 49.00 11.330 77120 74.000 TL.% rt4.. MFe.

OCoIr Crrok Nver, OEr'Hmff Sftufl-f D-i-n -i ffof Coot A..Iyyd.

D-.,.1 E164145l4W R-o. O Appe-dl. A, Pago a /r'I Table F Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

IAet 06-84.

LLRW NRC Spool F.,A4 54 Pooo.do B.01 Vodon,.

Bonol ItIy 0

D oo.

R.14 Pdog Tropod Pwsc$l DhlSAAI o0*6 T

ob Totl Ue.7 M.an....4 fRt t oes V

Am A

Clus A CI... 11 l

C 0CC GTd Cft Con I

co ct c

et.

e Cot.

c-t, c

Coo Ce.

Cost, c

Co t.

c Coot.

C.F C. F C. F c

F. t C..Fo WI. Lb..

M.tAs t1.4

[

0o.or D~eopbn PERtO 48.-L5 Ceonlt R.ol P.f4d AS DOe D A&.L.

PAdr. Sstf.. S Sy.%. Rono0 4a..1.

RPd-otin Pvu,.&

UMw 4a41. 12 CRDM7 & Nbs Re'sI 41.1.3 R4do, VasesN h4ft*

4A.I.1 4 V4.d & F.lht CTCC D1.PoM 40.1.5 R..d VA%.o 4.t.1 TotAls R.vwod ofMajo.

ESowmt 4412 Matn Tu ro/,ow 4a 13 MU Co4a Dloo4 of Pb.4 Systo Dq.6 Sots Coow'as 4SL1.4 Total1 R""

B.4Sq Syimm C aowo A4.1.5 1 RC16RC3 4.1.5.2 RCA 40.1.5.3 RC9 44t.S.4 RCO 4415 RCG 4 t srRCJ 48 1.5.7 RCM 41.5 a RCS 48.1.5.9 Res 441510 RCT 4a.1.5 TotLs N4 Rs&l-e a," *9 Syitt Caoe.t4 4.1.6.l 7Es 40.1.6.2 N20 4A.1 6.3 WPP 44.164 3N2A 4a.I.6.5 POD0 4.1 66 N"

4a.6.7 "Y4 4.1.6.6 N8P "A a16 N30 4*.1610 N3R 44.16.ll NOS 44.1.6.12 NPT 44.1 6.13 N83U 44.1.6.14 NSW 4A.1.6.15 NY 44.1.6.16 NP1

4. 16 17 NS2 44.16.16 P4N3 40.1.6.19 NP5 44.16.20 MS5 4.16.21 NP5 4a.1.J.22 NSA 4&.16_23 N5s 4.16 24 NMC 4o.I.6.25 NSD 7

77 27 124 64 l.741 4.316 915 62..

33 10 247 363 183 17 419 2.680 462 2.0'4 132 8D0 5.601 776 209 6.5169 132

.976 702 247 14.07T 263 l6t 623 170 940 3.457 11.1.4 655 6a6I 6.0t 16J64 1o32 36378 923 940 II.164 36.378 633 527 5179 I.02 1.377 16.2063 63 24li 1.377 227.1* 0 2.158 l126so 0

. 38 287 300.82S 17.509 411 72.900

1. 4.750 17.;09 287 41l 2.668.475 400512 2 es55.154 4.957

• .63126 10140 832 832 1.665 232 549 lst 5264 714 342 94 320 92 7.144 7.14 59.503 720 5.109 5.19 36738

• 3 240 46 48 73 es1 658 37 745 1

12 21 1

I 41 5

4 5

321 1

1 62 I

1

-00 I

3 120 2

5 175 4

3 51 110 0

1 38 15 27 69 137 I

6s 110 683 26 167 20 120 37 235 6s 410 SI 277 15 91 360

.170 S

to 512 167 120 230 410 277 91 2.17n 14 I'147

-64 501 is 3.974 617 2.107

-3.

636 330 464 11.078 412 577 63 11.731 6

21.619 P.009

• 16l.

354 S.27 45.136 1.O0 2s. 044 I.088 a

0.36 1.636 5.541 3.610 S.4A2 1.313 18.858 807 4670.

M64N 106 2

2 29 65 0

4 o

1 I

2 46 0

I 322 60 o

1 41 ss 11 1

21 67 o

1 36 17 5

0 1

12 0

6 12 0 o 6

17 o

0.

15 10 s7 I

3 46 107 79 4

S 52 11 143 3

7 247 27 0

1 I

23 0

0 10 8

40 1

1 20 15 12 o

0 4

6 0

0 1

33 74 I

2 56 26 1

1 18 16 27 o

1 25 12 0

9 19 0

0 12 46 253 253 3

15 Is 6

57 57 16 96 96 20 1I7 117 3

I1 16 3

l8 is 22 127 127 7

39 39 4

22 22 4

24 24 7

40 4*

3 19 19 54 293 293 s0 315 315 74 474 474 10 57 7

10 62 02 17 93 23 a

26 26 1s 102 102 28 164 164 14 78 7T 10 63 63 4

26 26 7

39 39 362 196 49

-41 306 501 27 3

447 179 167 610 326 643 359 3.0534 239 121 28

• 248 52 46 19 414

• 226 65 307 106 152 32.343 2.373 2.007 176

• 3.

1.6 406 16.151 999

20. 382 1237 1.366 259 18.140 1.492 7287 374 3.260 261

- 934 258 7.583 367 23 23S7 240 53.705 1.673 s

6024 1.740 124..08 3.161 0-9,77 621

,:7,154 539 14.050 815 3.347 259 1 6.809 1.014 29.826 1.527 3.435 8U I I2485 WS 4294 267 86.190 428 2*LO Sen fr.. I.e.

0O.#'r Cree Nouel", Or-rHn.C~totlo lCo-ldoitCo A.olyd.

Dov.I EI&14&4WK R.

0 Api-di. e rPog 9 ofic Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) 004" 1+/-0W MRC 3p.Mt F.W.

A,..

P-ao..

8-1.t Vo4-o~

6.-t I

MU,r.nd Ae.lI.

D.

Roal Paclksl.. Trtwd PO g

PW..

0.

TOW To~ l LM.

YC

-ng Fwl ft-dn Vk-..

ClP. A Ca 6 VCl. C eC ;..

l a4.udsr Id...

0eb..I.

Cnd Co C."

Ct.M.

C...l. COt's C.

Cot. cat -

C.o Col.

C-st Ce1s Cu. F._

C.u..

1 C..rM. F.. C...

F..

WlLS..

U.-h Muho N4 R%.

5.b.

Sp.bm. _..,4 (eo l

As, 1627 NSF 4.14r28 NSO 4.l.8.29 N51 4.18.00 Nll 4.1J.832 NIIK 41.1 6.33 N5H 4& 1.84 NS0 41..6.35 NSP 41.1.6.36 NSO 4z. 1.S.D3 NSS 4.1.6.38 NST 4.1.6.40 NSY I.~.^

NSZ 41.1..41 N2Z 41.1642 PPA 41.1.6 Tol Old RPM

. &fl SyW Ch.mo_ h 46.1.7.1 7BA 4.1.7.2 7TDA 41.7I.

7F'A 4.1.7.4 PBA 41..7.5 PDA 41.7 6 PMA

44. 17.7 PRA 41.78 FFP7 TP 4.5.7 Tobb T

u.0*

Sh" Sy¶, Co-.4 4.1.8.1 7CA 4.1.82T92 4&1.. 3 T923 4.1 8 4 TE 8 41.1 8 TE2 4.1.8.7 TEE 4.1.8.8 TEG 4.1.8.9 TP2 4.118.10 TP3 4.1.8.11 TPE 4 1.8.

Tol Anvou.4d Oflgas Systeo Cw.po f 4.1.9 Totls Moo9oa Soulbo C

'Fssd 4.1.10 Totals 411.11 S.lO.

9 h66,g dd ew.4ssbrq 4a.1 S&uW P.do 4. Ay Co-h P.d 44A tA,- CotW 4.121 Cut. SuoOd- (ECd.

RO) 412 SMOM P.td 41 AIddb.

Cost.

• 13 19 9

11.

I

• 10 49 19 9

so 24 24 51 1MT17 o

0 9

0 0

7 9

3 o

4 o

0 11 0

a 1

2 54 11 12' 1

1 10 12 2

5 1'7 I

1 49 a

1 1

4 0

0 12 4

0 0

12 4

1 1

.'8 1

29 41 1.252 415 27 27 8

4

• 44 3

15 10 3

17 1I 3

1 19 4

23 23 4

20 20 7

38 38 21 127 127 10 07 07 10 Ss 56 39 267 257 22 131 131 22 131 131 O

49 49 9

49 49

23.

132 132 651

3. 09 3.809 56 0

1 39 33 1

1 1O 40 s1 0

1 1I S

100 4

3 72 76 38 0

1 30 8

1 2

8, 9

2 31 7

8 243 125 1s5 5

6 142 130

.11 I'l 41 M5 4

3 3

II 0

0 10 1.073 4

112 3.928 131 3

6 282 220 4

9 333 1I 0

Io 116 2

S 2'1 77 3

3 69 S7 69 3

2 52 se 2,048 79 174 S.009 253 20 117 II?

20 100 1Os 15 Slo slo SS 310 310 14 61 61 3

1 18 25 119 lss 3

14 14

¶48 847 847 101 570 570 311 I.957 1.07 I

9 0

4 20 25 879 6.038 6.038 77 501 501 107 673 673 6

35 3S 62 402 402 45 254 254 42 234 234 1.636 10.698 10.609 110 91 27 40 5

15 131 70 143 670

. 83 48 162 47 3.195 ros 29 607 28 1 153 12

.153 12 15.491 1.3143 490 1

122 121 208 25 93 206 s373 655 30 3.011 404 1.700 390 1.906

.42 124 4 34.09

.4095 4.115

~139 -

2.619 5M 209 487 225 74.330 824 4453 278 6.103 411 1.645 209

• 1.556 1n 2.0q0 238 s.3a2 187 3050 224 803 433 27,221 1.083 10712 419 10.- a 413 69.10 989 26.709 1.116 25.787 1,12 7.230 54 7230 540 23.775 1.127 741.09 S1a43

• 1.481 1245 10.829 718 10.642 340 m3 2.23 18.100 809 2 74 190 34703 1.294 1.199 202

• Il901 7,038

.109.21 4.086 4831529 14.232 I1699 8s

.034 220 1.74.054 23.61s 141.841 2.803 167.129 4.683 S 840 384 n107.977 2.578 5023 I3738 43.953

Si19 3.087.463 55.199 580 10 119 12.816 5.009 i20w 09 17 17.314 10,022 263 1a 874 874 18.046 67.090 97.090 1.07 66 201.36 26.431 1.37 287 53.469 14.519 li l 11201.390 106.378 177 mT1 U

222 m2 222 m

TLG S-t.c, Me.

O..g, Ct-rl N-

., fjrtiJr Strfo.

Dh..odaalmnei,.g Cot A.At,.oft.

lev.

.i Elb14155 eo, Re. O App-d&&h Page w0.f Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

I Adtn P..w -e

.RW

-R pn li rt-I Itut BMa.IF wtv.

d COao ltta Pad&tWg Ttm-.npo P=ocn D-po-at Ott,.e Tod Teom LlCTa Hanatat tr.tlSnd.t Vr.

Cnan A

, B.

Cl.C CTCC Posoad

0.

Cottendo C-st Cod ot t

C.

Cost cots Cods CMt.

Coolao Cast Coat.

Cant.

Ct.

C. F d CA.

F d Ca. Fst C... T dtCGT.Ca WP bdit.

CtI.t 24tsUount noww AnY _ensn P.AW 4a Cdtdt.W C-%t.

4*.3.1 PMOnct Bnd taos 4a3.2 S&-a bd ao

4. 3 SdW Ptdod 41 Cflnd CoWa Pelc4 'a PodOepad Coas 4.4 1 0..oa tgnA 4* 42 h~

4.4.3 Pv..ttafs 4.44 Hta pS I 9

rpp 44..

Hane" eqtw fwnt 4.4.6 Dlso of DAWg d

414.7 Plod--1 as.1gy..da 41.4.S NRC Foss 4.4.

st. O6M Cod 4a.4.10 Radwt P-

• .g Eo0p0,VS*A.

4.4.11 S

~taff COs 4.4.12 DOCSrICoc 414.13 uLOtyStff Cod 44A Sbl Petn 4. P etd.t.4 Cot.

4L.o TOTAL PERIOD 4. COST PERIOD 4b. S8* DftarM P.trb46 D 41 D.anb.f At 41..1 Rt.

SM t ra Dips Pbdnt SW*t St-Cttt-wo 4b2.2.1 MAC 4b.1.2.2 toA 4b1.2.3 ICA 4b.12.4 lEA 4b.12.5 RCS 4b.12 Totl Res" BoIW.5 Syr.. Cnpnt.

4b.1.3.1 R8I 41.1.3.2 ReB 4b.1.3.3 R8C 4b.1.34 R8E 4b.1.3 5 RIF 4b.1.3.8 R8O 4b.1.3.7 Res 4b.1.3 6 RSW 4b.1.3.9 RC7 4b.1.3.10 RO8 4b.1.3.11 RQ1

• b.1.3.12 REC 4b.1.3.13 REF 41.1.3.14 REVROEI 4b 1.3.15 REL 4b.1.3.18 REM 1..3.17 REO 4b.1.3.1 REO 4b.1.3.19 RER 4b.1.3.20 RET 4b.1.321 REW

• b.1.322 REX S

5 13 106 135 5

135 a

Is 108 32 184 1U4 20 158 140 53 320 304 103 13.045 20 16 a1 103 13.045 20 35 I 7M 1.428 3S Z.112 163 15.144 6

44 64

657 6

2 2

814 91 1.006 905 192 m

9t58 214 1.640

1. 640 a

10 215 60 328 326 4 429 64 403

• 3 397 40 406 436 2

34 263 293

• • 329 49 373 379 9

• 41 141 1.0Q2 1.082 7.37T 1.107 8.183 8.483 13109 18 96 15.076 15.076 44 10 215 24.381 4,033 30.910 30.860 5.008 1.224 17314 15.572 24.645 19.475 96.041 986425 378 46 07 Bs 1.645 273 228 es 112 06 188 43 43" 616 132 72 73 3

93 62 62 32 142 184 37 64 112 I?

37 8

23 19 21 58 34 575 1.99 5

4 71 t44 10 7

149 225 3

3 75 63 0

1 36 76 4

S 803 1.930 2

6 202 I

3 106 1

3 120 1

3 112 4

3 60 101 11 29 907 7

a 223 142 1

3 109 1

3 9

17 11 100 541 0

1 22 2

5 18 6

4 0

171 1

3 107 3

8 2M6 I

1 43 6

4 90 162 3

4 106 50 1

1 14 13 0

0 15 3

0 0

12 S

0 13 627 2.621 2.821 66M

.312 3.332 10" 513 513

_ 178 851 651 39 229 229 18 96 95 1.007 5.021

• .021 64 406

• 06 34 216 216 37 235 235 41 254 254 06 307 307 230 1.030 1.030 113 OM0 6O0 40 246 246 29 16s 185 176 807 t57 It 6s 85 80 367 367 09 371 371 38 23m 233 77 497 497 18 9 06 76 422 422 07 331 331 28 131 131 13 63 83 7

38 38 7

42 42 101

01 3.737 li11 201.361 3018 1.461 6.397 7.111 4.07 Sao8 432 1

10641 V7 11 8261e 3186 8

440 11.199 5802 2.40 495 1206 1.485 1.381 740 315 11229 2.757 428 1.343 1.106 1.861 1 24 296 1.953 8

56 15 1.325 3.256 538 1.115 486 1.:11 150 17T go e18 II 146 e16 U.

.A;i

7.

.6 918 379.329 297 411 11269.330 167.34 380.983 73.115 1.071

• 612.63 6.009 74.839 39362 1

.4 1.037 0.479 1.091

.89 862

• 971.049 14.067

-101.306 2.-13 0,19 1.069 5 6.20963 2.123 57,301 1.063 406,39 6.0051 100.334 3.774 5

046.0 2.081 44.17 1.306 221.264 1.434 10.670 680

• 31329 31,32 73.233 1.004 SIMS9 1.S091 5t3.06 1.651 133.445 3.177

• 21.6146 62 886.669 1.606S 6.646 2.010 s 9,17 1,0 5,836 422 6.8710 406 w

m Setfrrr 7m.51.

O~Wer Crek Nlear Gew..raffhj StaH..

-r.-ooloeioda Co.. A..yot.

Dneotoe.. E19-143StM RS. 0 App.drL OF Pr.

It orfs Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousasnds ot 2003 Dollars)

OS.Soo

.LRW NRC Spm nFl f

s1.

Pfeoe.d 8-d Vd.1.

DooiJ Ul1.ty e.d Aotl.Oy Don. R--W P.44sghq T-n pe ng.

Dapood 0ttr Total Total Li. T.

Mbn4qa.

Rt.ton Veo Ck-. A C1..B C..

C CTCC P-.d e.ft COO ted..

A.

oo I.

Coot Coot Co Co.

Coot.

Coot.

Coot.

Ct Co Coot Coel Coot.

Coot.

Cu. Fet C..Coto Fo C

Foot C. Fo WtLb..

Munh-.

M-hoI Rood.

• Oos Garom Cow ls (W0.wod) 4b.1.323 REY 4b.1.324 RFs 4b.1.325 RFC 4b.1.3J2 RFF 40b1.3270 RrH 4b.1.328 RFJ 4b1.3.29 rt.L 4b01.30 RFN 4b.1.331 RFo b.1.3.32 RGC 4b.1.3.33 RGD 4b.1.3.34 Rai 4b.1.3.35 ROL 4b.1.3 36 RGf 4b0.1_37 RCR 4b.1.3.338 ROU

0. 1.39 RHI 4.1340 RH2 4b.1.3 42 RtA 4b.1.3.43 RtJ 4b.1.3.44 RM11 4b.1.34* RHX 4b.1.3144 RHY 4b.1.3.47 RVCC 40.1.3 T'do1 NCw Rd'osete fhg Soo.. Coea40 4b.1.4 I N0 4b.1.42 N448 4b.1.:.3 N4A 4b.1.44 N48

• b.1.4 5WO4 4b.1.4.6 ME4 lb.14.7 N4F 4b.14 8 NMH 4b.I.0 N4X 4b.1.4.10 N4L 4b.1.4.11 NsR 4b.1.4.12 NSV 4b.1.413 NSW 4b.1.4.14 NSX 4b.1.4 Total.

Old Radota BOe Syos Cr..ft 4b.1.51 ORW Pf 0nD DeSDogo D4 D0n 4t.1.5.2 PRO

• b.1.5.3 rSs 4b1.04 PTA 4b.1.5.0 PJUA 4b.1.,.7 CUA 4b.1.5 8UAs 40.1.0.9 UAS 4b.1.S To0h16 23 0

109 2

24 U8 3

78 1

102 7

69 6

ST I

77 1

107 I

o0 I

173 5

35 0

41 1

20 0

128 2

-O I

33 0

28 1

I 6

14 0

29 0

19 0

35 0

32 0

Be U

I 01 3.500 109 0

23 4

2 2

22 23 23 0

10 2

182 135.

131 27 8

70 56 170 el 61 90 76 04 a13 33 4

19 132 27

'a 23 10 34 30 s0 S.009 1t27 0

47 47 40 293 293 S1 24 2a 31 161 1 5 79 422 422 74 397 397 24 1a 14 33 200 205 39 225 225 23 139 139 170 1.,1a 1.1,a 14 U4 U4 17 105 105 6

46 4*

63 316 316 21 122 122

12.

74 74 14 as B

20 158 1S 1 1 50 50 II 63 63 6

31 30 14 07 47 II 70 70 29 176 170 2110 12.624 12.628 192

1. 622 337 207 23 692 525

• 60 510 754

• 42 Usa 10.058 414 5

00 238 1.633 047

.339 550 592 63 34 212 121 440 099

.a 4

1,983 4.901 7.781 512 e s

60. 69 2.414 32.210 1.978 37.469 1.690 70170 2.21 73.713 1.97, 30.625 1282 4-5.418 17 12 38.243 2.379 27.107 1.34 409.453 3.no1 2tS45 794 9.881 493 8 6314 2.623 22.109 1.249 s4 733 22.340 415 24.091 1.765 6.374 440 411.43 6u 4.913 416 I?.r1t 782 14.00 714

.40160 1.468 2.- 0.733 80.238 116 s9 9

20 7

19 60 10 16 23 53 39 40 01 10 107 S16 1

3 113 0

1 43 1

1 15 12

.1 0

13 10 O

1 37 1I 0

a, 0

1 1

S S

0 0

14 0

0 14 I

2 03 2

1

.39 29 1I 1

2 6

6 14 467 SS 47 281 21 125 13 64 21 119 1

7 5

24 0

41 8

As 26 37e 45 205 2

I 01 233 249 1.436 281 125 72 64 119 28 45 37 165 205 1.430 TJ1.392 030 183 42 182 34

• 17 98 217 14 1.029 482 111 10 s

077 203 58 U38 2.u47 21508 1295 o.071 587 l

90 I009 11.400 1.300 607 106 3.994 285 10.03 337 ry.136 3352 r l.

525 41.72 1.188 27.292 1.916 4

401 146

.4.17 2.378 249.54s 13.525 143 11 94 27 142 100 214.

147 8 8 0

0 12 1

3 47 0

I 30 1

3 112 2

4 147 16 2

5 191 2

5 104 10 22 77 16 21 164 104 S

28 28 39 234 234 It 69 69 53 "II 311 52 322 322 2

6 9

U4 4"

4 04 6S 404 404 332 2.041 2.041 151 1.196 371 1.825 6

13 US38r 7

2277 9,590 88 2.839 6.112 245 408.34 2.09 JS.04 603 00.392 3.006 87.471 2.224 519 148 49.11?

4.448 92455 3221 393n3 19.120 rrL sa lee.

OyWr Ch Nwel.., 42.trtlio Statn Do~nnIoi Cot Aatlod.

lno..,..nre"gel 5J.o0 Rr. e AppedS F. rnj i

.f 1f8 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars)

I.-

I I=l D.O Itc..

P.cogho Tlcspal PFnag DOpeosal Oth Tol To I

TM t M-T9-

.ttfisa Vobk CL.. A CI.- BV..

C GTCC PI C8CIA

=aI Coo Cod C-ot.

Coto CoC.

C cot CIr C-Cft.

Coo Co Cu. F_

CU. F

c. FoC Fo t C. Fo vWb L..

U.Ml MUn...

t DeBetun Twbhe 6i*.9 Sysbt CoVot4 0.1X.e.

1 TO2 4b. 1.e2 TF2 48.13 TFG 4b. 1.A TF2 4b.1.e TKA 4b.1.0.7 71.2

'4b1 e

"^

40'.9 1142 4b.1.1 1o T02 4b.1.5.11 TOA 4b.0.e12 TOCR 4b0. 6.13 TOR Ab.1.S 14 TO" 4b.11. 1 Tow 4b.1..16 TOXITOY 40.1.5.17 TS2 40.1.6.la TIA 4b0.1.619 e

1.T2 4b.1 e Total A.w-od OS2" 5yst-C aMeont 4b.1.7.1 AY8 40.1.72 AYA 4b.017.3 AYS 4b.1.7.4 AYC 4b.1.7.s AYE 4b.1.76 AZ$

4b.1.7.7 AZA 4b.1.7.8 AZC 4b.1.7.9 AZD 4b.1.7.10 AZE 40.17.11 AZF 4b.1.7.12 AZI 4b.1.7 To18s Lt SOyb C.

4b.1.5.1 BAA 40.0 6.2 eDA ft.1.3 BOA 4b 1.e4 CAA b.18 I

CsAA 4b.1.68 CAC 4b.1.8.7 OGB 4b.1.8.8 00T 401 9 OPH 4b.1 0.10 o01 4b0.t5..l FWP 4b.

.12 GAA I GCA 4b.1 e 13 INAKE STRUC1URE 4b.1.8.14 MA

• b.1.e.11 MOA 4b.1 1 s I MBT

• b.le.17 MS 4b0.116 es MB ROOF 4b.1.8.19 00 40.1 I

20 PTO 4b0s1..21 RSF ROOF Ab01.6.22 UYARD

• b.1 6 23 WAA 40 1

2m 8

22 Is1 0

0 165 7

17 311 7

1l 1e 0

ee 2

2 42 1

2 216 4

10 119 o9 1

2 49 2

4 1

2 I I o

76 2

e 19 0

0 137 4

9 41 1

2 27 2

9 1.77 44 10.

32 7To 12 611 42 39 72 359 82 137 79 6

207 10 213 189 n.826 29 II 67 67 177 1.2 1209 8

27 27 13n 937 63?

T77 1.154 1.114 0

27 27 23 186 15s 22 139 138 110 700 7M0 16 137 20 172 172 33 224 224 22 1"

144 e

28 28 81 342 342 5 ~ 39 36 83 940 841 21 103

.138 08 391

.391 1.007 6.600 6.482 30 9.48 ISO 7.144 7.914 74 523 119 eff 4.447 137

..014 1.992

.en 8s.8 2.0057 124 6se 137 44"eo l19 M150 511 9591.743 4.642 01S 3n9 307.17 3.878 321.393 6.639 2.96 348 U31 82 1440 W.

9.37 ON 160.58s 4.743 2.773 41.172

.302 ee.8.e97 1,058

• 7.795 97 278 25 193.07 0.620

5..052 423 157.32 2.984 e s

.0 21 as8.139 2.627

.931097 39.193 go 21 19 1

17 38 79

• 12 1.1 10 21

• 77 1

4 0O 1

0 1I 1

2 O

1' 1

3 0.

0 1

6 14 129 41 22 62 49 3

93aX 6

28 474 172 64 7

41

.1 103 04 10 87 18 90 16 142 35 2e 27 13 213 30 21 1.324 113 3

7 235 2

5 178 2

7 18 633 0

1 30 1

3 09 1

3 119

.e

.8 1

3 97 44 274 274 12 7e 7r o

10 s0 21 161 181 17 107 107 3

10 I

13 15 n2 19 198 4

22 22 4

21 21 4

22 22 10 60 60 10 1.037 1.037 79 4s 496 43 291 201 2

12 12 164 101e2 1.182 1e 82 92 41 247 247 e

65 2

12 10 77 2

1e 14 104 2

1e 21 163 40 201 201 14 83 6

e 2

42 4

31 2

is 32 245 5

30 7

45 43 408 2.250 22-0 43 257 257 1.sss 912 287 1.012

.103 e 11 40 1.145 70 70 90 343 2.908 2.193 27 s7.28 5

376 12 77 18 104 18 163 413

• 2*

I Is 245 17

• 8.162 1.197 64.13 2125 20 nTS

• e3 10.682 430 4410780 1.126 4 199 375 24.706 829 1 eis no0

• e 809 1547

3.

3063 267

2. es 206 en.72 233 13.938 473 238.198

.315 e118031 3.779 s ess.

1.403

.063 167 317.69 7.50 1.27 1.004 49,960 2.302 1.277 223

,1.501 359 2013 350 3208 1.776 759 4 4.371 575 8e30 294 4.818 897 7.097 463

.20262 21.729

.48.03 2.491 naLl.s,,l,.. rMe.

O,,Mr C-CooL

/rrairm l) rnnm dni#

A.4nnr.

Docnn.a6 E16-14045-,

R"O. 0 Appr.dLn E, Pore 13 ofif Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollabr) lAIlhty OI-Sa bLRW NRC Spm rFasl Sta.

P-ananod

-n1 Vd,-.

Barbi i ULan..d Dac Raod Ctort TiratnPet Ps.ndng Dl pooi ott.

Tow T

k.Ta.

Maowt RoststC Va..

C1-.A Cba..B C

C...

C GTCC Csat Coot cant Cant.

Coat.

Caata Cnt C..te a7~t**a-Coamt" Cto coott Conta Cant.

Co. Can C.. Fant C.. FW.

o o C

C.. Pan Wt. tha.

Mot..

VIhato I

l~~-

l D-WU141e SYntM CMentn (eC ad) 4b.1

".24 WHS 4b.1.8 25 YARDAROAS 4b.1.628 YDA /YFA I YLA 4b.1 8 Tott Ab.1.9 Swffo*,g h taw d a

gtow-4.dnq D

_..*b d Sh BA*"

4b.1.10.1 NM Rodnoot B."

. Synlo," R.M b..1.10.2 Old RPantn_ 86ddhg

• SytWnr4 R a

4b.1.10.3 Rooar &At

• Syto,,,* Ratan 4bA 10.4 Tntebt* 8a.9. Syten Roost 4b.1.10.5 hntd OR Gto. D.

4b.1.10 6 Drfll.oDann 4b.1.10.T Dryd. t RLb-b S1.10 i

URW 5

. Dan.

4b.1.10 9 I 1oan,Og. D een 4b.1710.10 Nte Radt o - D an 4b.0.110.11 CtdR t.gDana.

4b.1.10.12 RB0.To R. W.

45.1.10 Ol3Fdot.A 6

1st.00.

4b.1 12.1 Renr B.d5 29t. Dn9 451.10.10 R..do,

S0,5

+11D 4b.1.10.18 Re"dS. BS4 75t. Da Lb.1.1017 Rd..

a.ag" o.-,

451.10.1S St.dltaIrOi Ttn o.

R

& Dec 4b.1.10.19 Tu1, *Mdn 0t. Dect0 4b.1.10 20 Twt*. BS*n 23t.

nD 4b.1.10.21 T.ob* Bo Lt.

Deo 4b.1.1022 Cet.to.5td Sol 4b.1.1023 Rood.*aVng 11tf. D-4b 1t10 Tto ob.1 stt Patd 4b Atdhb Canto Pa.d At, AddMM Cost, 4b 2.1 ISFI U a Tl, n

Lb 2 swtto P..bd Lb AdMat Costs P.Wd *b Crltd Catb t.:31 Pt o wo nt b.32 Disposl df odttoiLNt a, Lantta45,da 4b 3.2 tw Lb_ 33 Stoa Wd afton.

Lb.3 Stw Pwd 4Lb Cod d Cost, Pt

• b PtD-

.. MM Cost Lb 4.1 De er 4b.42 ba 4b.4.3 P4nenly tooe Ab.4.4 Nnld, t4yda g,*

4b A.S Hno n ant

• tb 4 D

ot ol d DAW eW 05.4.7 Plta. --

W bt Lb6.

NRC Fr.

4b 4 9 si. O&l Cost AbA.10 Rad.o P w.ocs..0 EWt tSwo, 4b.L.11 so.oy Stot Cant 4b.L.12 DOC Stall Coa Lb.4.13

=yaff cost 4b.4

s.

Ptd Lb 4

tPbd-Do.t.4 Coatb 13 2.3 3

1 327 23 2

58 1.947 srs l

s 102 25 e3 37 24 1

382 2

4 3

1 A1 3

a 4

es s2r g off 1

51 s

4 4

56 I

401 130 119 2.5069 1.449 u4 30 so 1.76 154 7

27 3

2 33 7

27 3

2 33 33 193 21 10 19 2tL 315 e

ss 12 077 1.942 973 40 7S 2.649 229 23 132 II 10 16 bS Is 60 7

4 70 17 66 5

78 a

24 3

2 26 12 48 s

3 se 72 161 13 134 so 217 21 1s 03 211 33 163 la 12 90 161 20 7T 9

6 94 76 1.039 663 10.020 310 382 a

a 128 s1 4.006 4.695 1.600 1.144 4.946 1t.170

• .9A 16.619 1.946 1.636 18202 22.008 2

1s 38 279 1

4 4

1.027 6.325 5.209 249 1.312 1.312 124 051 651 11 61 61 10 06 96 310 1.006 18600 30 16?

16?

794 4.09 4.000 1.254

.73 5.ns3 19 n2 92 19 92 n

2 125 61S 616 317 1.662 1.662 t.sa5 7.599

?'s" 96 530 530 41 19?

1o 06 210 210 33 1ss lOS 112 001 001 150 757 70?

IlL 589 389 00 202 262 2.077 10275 15275 204 194 I104 t.04A 42.100 42.100 15.339 60.325 60.112 IS 300 279 5.99 19 783 30 1.07s 2403 978.424 65.3 1.50 99 8

00.203 21.839 0

3.819 30.i14 1875 0

405

• e784 53 640 64.s00 e0

9. 194 15,M S."?7 45

• s 57.145

.23z

• . 13.7 1.0817 9202 22.108 801 951.2s 47.881 333 3i330 651

• 28 327s 6ss 235 2.129 22Z101 45207 152 0.7 se 92550 4.766 3274 891 1.10.755 sos.02 2.052 010 171.8n7 3.192 700 70.017 1.027 781 78.06 1.02 200 20.130 s06 e55 55.707 1.140 1.339 133.070 4.620 1.104 2.069 21.9 50240 1,109 1.570 200.63 3.0855

.41 9.13 1.808 106.200 t 0.619.990 6.020 1.0 442 107.208 14.570 61.196 107.182 18.103.570 10o,7 10213 228,170 174.709 26.381.130 44a.3v 64 7

53 00o 1.27 s00 3.070 940 7

53 S06 1m 507 3.074 3.074 4.23 3.074 4.723 006.151 100:.601 ts60 2.50s 14 153 1.36 324 14 324 003 104 1.306 701I 1.700 22n2 781 3.970 64 19 04 lO 1.0 1.44.

11

D 626 302 521 1.90

40.

137,39 11 37.398 300 2.133 2.133

'49 373

37 445 2.506 2.506 100 977 V77 104 1.1a 1,14 140 1.093 1.93 426 2.130 2.130 341 2.613 2.013 t04 620 628 76 S"4 s4 63 691 691 04 410 416 70 600 600 224 1.71 0.l4 1.718 13.171 13.171 Z.02 22 940 22.940 8.530 49*2e 49.20 2.069 1

2.069 7.164 339.017 90 20 0

339.006 o0 143.563 1.759

• 90.686 179 8tO 315.133 143.63 1.75 5t6.679 T7(2 RSr-r Mne.

O~frCn-h N-1-s O--f.eafl fiSal.

DessfsalgCa-l A,.alkol Eln..Oso-USS-I&Ko 1?-, 0 Appos.dia EPag. 14of 1#

Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAF8TOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2003 Dollars) 05-3" LLRW NRC Spt Fast Fw ts P.54*55.d B-nd Vd.-

1B-1t ulty nd Co-t R.saal Padgn Ttept P-.9t Oapas Ott.

-Tta Ttal Li.b on W..,s-a Rtt.

Vd r Clas A Cca B CI.4 -C GTCC Pr d4.

Cos."

d Cost C.5S Cas19 Casts casts Caste Costs C.ot-Casts CS.tS Casto Cast.

C.a C2

.1Mai Ca. Fas C. PsC.

CPOsft 0

Lb.

U M. h OSat 5.783 21.506 2.101 1.892 Is=5 24.88S 389.75 22.822 136,100 121.810 3.074 1.213

- 226.175 186647 2.069.

27.369.890 459.010 58823 4b0 TOTAL PFERIOO b COST PERIMO 4.. Lk-se Tonstatta Petd 4* Ded Deosws.*ta A0*sbla 4@.1.0 0SE r

5, 4.5.2 T.

ult. l s

4.1 Slb P5 44 ACM"y Cota Pand 4. Addld Cat 4421 FPt4 Skt Suy 44.2 S0.*vW P.td 4 Add4Strai Costs P.1o*d4* Calote Coats 4e.31 DOC asof to 4.3 Sob Pabd 4e CWds Csts PtW 4# PF.1Db. r Cost 404.1 bo 4.4A2 PtWp. tLa" 4 43 Htst tpbyslas a"

4.44 Disps so DAWgsd 4.4.5 Pbn9 ay bdpt 4 4 6 NRC Fs 4 4.T Sit OSM Coa 46A4.8 SeewityStf Clt 4.9 DOC Sutf COO 4.4.10 Lily aIff Cod 40.4 SuWd Pe*0d A4 Pelod.odpesdM Costs 40.0 TOTAL PERIOD As COST PERIO0 4 TOTALS PERIOD 51.SIt R-tstWb Potod 5b Dl5 D.sss h9aV Adc*Ae D.v.olt dt Ra..bks SOt bSl4

50. 1.1.5 Sta,*En-T.-*,l. R-Is DG 5b.1.12 Ado*ftdim s&Af So. 1.1.3 AIogwtod Off GMs EfIg 20.1.5.4 CP rtrtts

.*b Sb.1.1 4Dasa.

a OA" Sb2t1.s D S

b 5b.1.1.7 0 6 Wmt rs ly Sb.1.1.8 Fhi P-r* HItvs 5b.1.1.9 FneslWst Pwso Hs Sb.1.1.10 H,.*g B.A H-s 5b.1.1.11 tIto Stbf sb.t112 Lro L-a Rs&-4M* Stomp 2b.1.1.13 Muao St.p Sb.1.1.14 U= Gft S...tI 2b.1.1.15 Mta.

sb.1.1.1s Mmeds WSMswaeh(

5b.1.1.17 MLsolSts tt 5b.1.1.18 Na R

_l B, I se Sb.1~.1D9 New S &re PwD MM" S.0.1.120 0 BNg 5b.1.121 Old R Al Bg 5b.I.122 PIlEegks."

6 35 1SO ISO 116 35 1SO 1SO 4.572 1.371 8.9 5.943 4 S4 2 1.37 5:.93 4

.89463 444 98.444 1.097 1.097 164 1261 1261 164 1261 1261 464 464 4 64 5.642 37.170 24 4451 241 26 91 1.

32 3S3 304 82 278 692 304 48 2148 361 137 41 54 9n 899n J753 75 828 62 156 S60 580 4

1 17 5

27 27 94 1*

18 106 327 33 359 359 188 25 216 216 232 35 287 267 4.M0 614 4.m700 4.706 5.019 713 SM 1.772 4

1 17 11.244 1.72 13.457 13.457 4

1 17

.17.028 3.297 20.811 20.611 7252 3.11 35.606 40.424 80.3*8 451.94 255.457 251.054 124 947 94 N6 507 38 277 4

s3 14 105 17 133 1

41 3

21 37 87 4a0 48 350 27 203 12 9n 41 316 104 72 s

Y349 72 052 5

8 32 246

-*4 415 21 180

.9 30 39 3.074 1.326 427.535 217.120

.1 277

.9

1.

133

.1

-o 4I 21 350 282 27T.8

• 316

• 788 49 52 246

.15 10S 6.1

.7

14. 143 2.5 9.536 6.1 73 0.

11419.53 6.105

"'Sig 146.836 267 411 38.66S.320 744,643 1.1,768 2.421 8,353 3.486S 4

.34 1.597 1.722 51 64 330 578 5.856 4.918 I

.02.

1257 4.943 10.317 4.807 7.234 148

-3.s.875

.456 2.120 nTO S.

s..

tyo.r Crak r

No1trr M.

rasSta40fl Deeostatsf..ot.I Cnt A.alIyd VAIpendi. I P

,Ot. O5 s

App~dXE. Pg. 1 f to Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (MTousands of 2003 Dollars)

IAtteY P.0t t..tW NRC Spont FUM S to Psd on-Vo.oo.

B.10I

=

,l iy.,I DOoto R

_.-M th.Osft Topt snsg DiSpOs Ottwr ToW Tolol ELItTots UMt Rs.,

Voktv Cl-.A Cl.. aCl..

C GTCC Pr.

Cft CIoto CoI Cost Co-.

Cot.

Cn tt Ct.

Coat Cn tlo..- e onth C-t.

Cr-t, Cooe.

tnt 5.

a. ro

a. C ta.

e-

t.

Cr Ve-tbo t h

tn&"

Aanny uzowt Daol.

o R-.ok~ Slt &&Vts (tosnta 5b.1.123 P Bottsn "t

IS 5b..1 524 R.."

K Sdtdo 5.1.120.5 S.V% Pod 5b1.1.12b Sft E nfq." BS.Ad Sb.1.127 Tot* Pad &

• .UY Ysd 5ht 1.28 Tvbnr40 etht 50.1.12S T.t"*t Ptoad 5tt011 Tot.%

S06 CMGsM AAfits 5.12 Rto Rtk44 5.12 G'dt &

_be" sit.

5b 1.4 FWni o t t t NRC 5S.1 S0tM P.,Id 5b AdstY Co.tt Pabd 5b Adal CosMt 5se2.1 Colotol COsa 5b22 sr2 SiM t Rtnt4.

5S2 Skwao Pt,,bd St Addlto Coot.

P.1v 5b Cd.ond Cott 5b 3.1 Sotol tId oIstB 503 Sv.h Pood S C dto Costs P.nbd 5b Psbd.OepWMt ColS 5 4.1 b

rmi Sb43 P2 pstytso"l 5b.4.3 M"t OtWt

&*tati eb 4 4 P1t.4

r.

bt.4t 51,45 Sit O&M CM.0 5S.45 sos0uy Slocoot S0 4.7 DMOC St Cow 5b.4

• Lyftsir Cot 5b.4 Satot Pvt 50 P.Iod-Dpood.o Conts 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOO 5b COST PERIOD S TOTALS 4.107 12 250 699 I., 38 407 14211 4

31 824 4.7I1 2

14 39 283 1os 003 016 3.954 of 48e 2Z132 16.343 947 31 14 2se 803 e 3.94 a46

• 15.39

• 45 6.446 201 3.940 9 514 1.42S 2

6 s6.e0 345 21236 420 M

3 1.0M2 1,002 7.er2 52 397

?

117 16 134 134 II?

3.203 24.556 1.062 r U2 23.474 499 7

709 499 107059 a

1.403 1.560

• 216.65 1.500 2.875 2.5011 1SO 0.858 0

60 0

36 0

36 es.

499 1oo 709 165 1.268 563 163 20 165 2s "a5 185

."M 3.327 3.327 2r,789 ee2 e8 971

.1.52 150 1.709 450" se.2

.7 1s 112 380 58 44 479 72 I1 e.10 977 7.47

.409 S

2,20 is3.1 2.37 193020 0

13.471 5.70e 45.032 1.042 O

13.471 0.760 45.032 1.082 I9n 1.709 a826 se 12 e44 7.467 19.020 75 43.182 7

43.102 29.150

.620 17.50

• 24.524 179.350 224.24 17.300 TLr m.qim. tAc.

0otl Ch.k Nodel", Qe-..

ttg Station Ncla osfoxf t Corl A.,.si,.

Dotor,.l EIS ISS432om Rr. 0 App..dx E, Pg. 1S of at Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands ofr2003 Dollatr) 05.34.

LLRW NRC Spo lFoo S..

Pr0td BonoVoNt.

B.ot UtWit5nd AdFt Do.-

R-oo Pototuto Trspst PeoTsdog DOps Olh r 04.9 Tobta Lb Tann.

M.q.odt Rntonorf Vokt Cl..A CL. r Cl. C GTCC Pr.c1otd.

Crt Cotnod.I

t.

Ar trllto.

Co t Co.t Cods Coot.

Cootb Cost Cst.

Conlr Cot.

Cot Ca Codt-Co Fo C.. o C. F..t C.. F C Foot Itb..

M tL....

Mt o

TOTALCOST TOCDEcOcMtSSION 12.571 nr.3s 7.3 3.065 37.7r 44.0D9 545.000 121.759 s52.113 610.09 19549.2 45.122 - 4585.5 25.234t t.40s 297 411 41.491250 1232.00?

5.32.254 SALCOSTTODECOMUtSSIONWTHlg6%

CONTtt4OsttCY:

052.IS tso~odu ob 253 dol.

TAL NRC LtCEt4SE TERM4NATION COST ts r571.5%

of 96115.

thtods of 200t do4.

ET FUEL. MANAGEMENT COST ts 23.5% ROt

$19tt9 os>oood 25t dott NCLEAR DEMOtLT1ot COST ts 4.11% OR:

u5.122 thosoo sf 20N3 doW.1 rOTAL PIARY SITE RAOWAST! VOLUME BURIED 44.t441 ebte F"t TAL SECONDARY SITS rADWAST! VOL.UME BURIED:

221.1118..st Fo.t ALGREATER THAN CLASS C RADWAST! VOLUME GENERATED itt rtebt Foot TAL SCRAP METAL REMOVEM 22.899 tol A. CRAFT LASOR REOUIREMENTS:

1.23210T7 a r.t End Note, 4.. kftwo lotha thd kty o rt d-Asd d dcalo.-stsdog opeo.

a.ka. esto Ns9400049 potfvt. by doco4ot*Wgsi.

O ttdg "S

1*

M 1

I-0 5 b st 1o toA 8cr~qt-si a ko tU2 S~to, foe.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis

• Document E16-1455 006,.Rev. 0 Appendix F, Page 1 of 12 APPENDIX F WORK DIFFICULTY FACTOR ADJUSTMENTS I

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 2 of 12 GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING WORK DURATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TLG has historically applied work duration adjustment factors in determining unit cost factors to account for working in a radiblogically controlled environment. In performing an aiea-lby-area decommissioning estimate, the work duration factors are applied on an "area" basis based on the nominal area conditions. Where practical, areas are established based on similar working conditions.

The WDFs fall into five categories: access, respiratory protection, ALARA, protective clothing (PC), and work breaks. The guidelines of how these factors are assessed for each area is described below. Table F-1 details the WDFs used for each of the seven unit cost factor sets contained in the estimates. Table F-2 outlines the unit cost factors used for each area of the Oyster Creek plant.

1) Access Factor:

Controlling Variables:

• Height of the component above' the working floor Difficulty in working around the component (restricted access)

Source of Variable Information:

• Estimators observation or judgment

• Plant drawings Range of Access Factor Adjustments:

0% - Components are accessible and located near a working level floor or platform 10% - Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the area around the components is congested.

20% - Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components and the area around the components is congested.

30% - Scaffolding (component between 12 - 20 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the area around the components are extremely congested.

.TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 3 of 12 40% - Scaffolding (component between 20 - 45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).

50% - Scaffolding (component greater than 45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).

2) Respiratory Protection Factor:

Controlling Variables:

• Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)

• Type of work (potential to create an airborne problem)

General area surface contamination levels Site specific requirements for maintaining respirator qualifications (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)

Personal air sampler requirements Sources of Variable Information:

• Radiation Work Permit Requirements Area Survey Maps Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Respiratory Protection Factor Adjustments:

0% -

Respiratory protection is not required (clean system or loose surface contamination has been removed).

25% - Respiratory protection is only required during limited segments of the work (i.e. physical cutting) 50% - Respiratory protection is continuously required while working on the component.

3) Radiation/ALARA Factor:

Controlling Variables:

• Component contact dose rate

• General area dose rate

• Site specific requirements for maintaining radiation worker qualification (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)

• Dosimetry requirements Sources of Variable Information:

• Area Survey Maps

• Site Radiation Protection Program Manual

• Radiation Work Permit Requirements TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 4 of 12 Range of RadiationIALARA Factor Adjustments:

(Note that surface contamination levels are principally accounted for in protective clothing requirements and respiratory protection requirements) 0% - The component is clean and is nbt located in a radiologically controlled area 10% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field < 2.5 mrem/hr).

20% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 2. 5 to 15 mrem/hr).

40% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 16 and 99 mrem/hr).

100% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field > 100 mrem/hr).

4) Protective Clothing Factor:

Controlling Variables:

• Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)

• General area surface contamination levels

• Type of activity (wet/dry work, potential to create a surface contamination problem)

• Site specific work schedule arrangements Sources of Variable Information:

• Radiation Work Permit Requirements

• Area Survey Maps

• Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Protective Clothing Factor Adjustments (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments):

0% - The component is clean and is not located in a radiologically controlled area.

30% - The component is clean or contaminated and is located in a surface contamination controlled area. Work is to be completed in accordance with TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 5 of 12 the requirements of an RWP, which specifies a single or double set of "PCs",

or "PCs" with plastics.

50% - The components is located in a surface contamination controlled area.

Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP,*

which specifies "plastics" in addition to double PCs for protective clothing.

100% - The component is located in a surface contamination controlled area.

Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies double "PCs" and double "plastics". (extremely wet or humid working environment).

5) Work Break Factor:

Controlling Variables:

• Site specific work schedule arrangements Sources of Variable Information:

Typical site work schedule Range of Work Break Factor Adjustments:

8.33% - Workday schedule outlined in AIF/NESP-036 (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments).

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Appendix F, Page 6 of 12 TABLE F-1 UNIT COST FACTOR SETS AND THEIR WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DECON I Clean DECON / Contarn.

Percentage Percentage UCF Set ID Access Resp.

PCs ALARA Access Resp.

PCs ALARA 1

10.0 0.0 0

10 10.0 0.0 0

10 2

20.0 0.0 30 10 20.0 0.0 30 10 3

20.0 25.0 30 30 20.0 25.0 30 30 4

30.0 25.0 50 30 30.0 25.0 50 30 5

50.0 25.0 50 40 50.0 25.0 50 40 6

I30.0 25.0 50 50 30.0 25.0 50 100 7

20.0 0.0 0

0 20.0 25.0 30 30 SAFSTOR / Clean l SAFSTOR / Contain.

Percentage Percentage Access Resp.

PCs ALARA Access Resp.

PCs ALARA 1

10.0 0.0 0

10 10.0 0.0 0

10 2

20.0 0.0 30 10 20.0 0.0 30 10 3

20.0 25.0 30 10 20.0 25.0 30 10 4

30.0 25.0 50 10 30.0 25.0 50 10 5

50.0 25.0 50 10 50.0 25.0 50 10 6

30.0 25.0 50 10 30.0 25.0 50 10 7

20.0 0.0 0

0 20.0 25.0 30 10 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 7 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Drvwell System Components IAA DRYWELL RECIRC LOOP 5

IAC DRYWELL EL. 13 - SUB PILE ROOM 5

ICA DRYWELL EL. 51 & 75' 5

IEA DRYWELL EL. 95 4

RC6 DRYWELL LABRYNTH 3

Reactor Building System Components RB1 REACTOR BUILDING - 19' GENERAL 3

RBB 19' NE 3

RBC 19'SE 3

RBE CRD SYSTEM PUMP ROOM 3

RBF REACTOR BUILDING EQUIPMENT DRAIN TANK ROOM 3

RBO 19' INSIDE TORUS 4

RBS TOP OF TORUS SEGMENT N/E 4

RBSW REACTOR BUILDING SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2

RC1 SOUTHEAST AIRLOCK 3

RC7 SW RAD MONITOR ENCLOSURE 2

RCA NORTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME 3

RCB LAUNDRY & LAB DRAIN TANKS/PUMPS 3

RCD NORTH BANK HCU's 3

RCG NORTH CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS 3

RCJ CRD SYSTEM FILTER/VALVING AREA 3

RCM SOUTH BANK CSS HEAT EXCHANGERS 3

RCN SOUTH BANK CONTROL ROD DRIVE MODULES 3

RCS SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (RCS15VM) 3 RCT REACTOR BUILDING EL.23-6 -ALL AREAS GENERAL 3

RD8 RX33' SHUTDOWN COOLING RM GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RDM TIP DRIVE ROOM WEST 3

REC CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMPS 3

REF SHUTDOWN COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM 1

REH NITROGEN COMPRESSOR AREA 3

REI REACTOR 51' TOOL CRIB 3

REL RBCCW HEAT EXCHANGER/PUMP AREA 3

REM SOUTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

REO CLEANUP SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM 4

REQ CLEANUP SYSTEM PUMP AREA 3

RER CLEANUP SYSTEM VALVE NEST EL.64 5

RET CLEANUP FILTER SLUDGE PUMP HALLWAY 6

REW INSTRUMENT RACK RK01 3

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 8 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCFSET Reactor Building System Components (continued)

REX INSTRUMENT RACK RK02 AREA 3

REY REACTOR BUILDING 51' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RFB SOUTH EAST GENERAL AREA (C.U. SURGE TANK) 3 RFC RWCU VALVE AISLE AND CONTROL AREA 5

RFF CLEANUP SYSTEM FILTER AID/PRECOAT TANK AREA 3

RFH OLD FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGERS & PUMPS AREA 3

RFJ ASFP HEAT EXCHANGERS/PUMPS AREA 3

RFL CONTROL ROD DRIVE REBUILD ROOM 3

RFN EMERGENCY CONDENSER VALVE AREA 3

RFQ REACTOR BUILDING 75' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RGC NORTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

RGD "B" EMERGENCY CONDENSER NE01-B 3

RGI SOUTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

RGL SOUTHWEST ACCESS AREA 3

RGP CLEANUP DEMINERALIZER VAULT (RGP16FM) 4 RGR LIQUID POISON TANKIPUMPS AREA 3

RGU REACTOR BUILDING EL.95 - GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RH1 NORTH FLOOR AREA 3

RH2 WEST FLOOR AREA 3

RH3 RB EL119ALLAREAS 3

RH4 REACTOR BUILDING CRANE 3

RH6 ELEVATOR CONTROL EQUIP AREA 3

RHA REACTOR CAVITY 6

RHJ CASK WASHDOWN / DECONTAMINATION AREA 3

RHL BRIDGE CRANE AND TRACKS 3

RHX SOUTH FLOOR AREA 3

RHY SOUTH EAST FLOOR AREA 3

RMCC REACTOR BUILDING MCC ROOM 2

New Radwaste Building System Components 7EB NRW TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 5

N2G NRW BUILDING GENERAL ALL ELEVATIONS 3

N2P NRW BUILDING PENTHOUSE 3

N38 NRW 23' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N3A NRW TRUCK BAY 3

N3D NEW RADWASTE FILL AISLE 4

N31 NRW #2 SUMP ROOM 4

N3N NRW SOUTH OPERATING GALLERY EAST 4

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 9 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCFSET New Radwaste Buildina System Commonents (continued)

N3P NRW HIGH PURITY PUMP ROOM 3

N3Q NRW WC-P-1B WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM 3

N3R NRW VALVE AREA WEST 3

N3S NRW WC-P-1A WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM 4

N3T NRW #1 SUMP ROOM 4

N3U NRW CONCENTRATOR SKID ROOM 'A'

' 4 N3W NRW CONCENTRATOR SKID ROOM 'B' 4

N3Y NRW HEAT EXCHANGER BUILDING 3

N48 NRW 38' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N4A NRW 'A' HOLD-UP TANK SL-T-3A ROOM 5

N4B.

B' HOLD-UP TANK SL-T-3B ROOM 5

N4D LARGE CONTAINER FILL SKID ROOM SL-Y-6 4

N4E NRW LARGE CONTAINER FILL SKID ROOM 3

N4F CLW PROCESS AREA 4

N4H SPENT RESIN TRANSFER PIPING 4

N4K.

NRW SPENT RESIN VALVE GALLERY 4

N4L PIPE GALLERY WEST 4

N51 NRW HP-D-1A DEMINERALIZER ROOM 5

N52 NRW HP-F-2A RESIN TRAP ROOM 5

N53 NRW HP-D-1B DEMINERALIZER ROOM 5

N54 NRW HP-F-2B RESIN TRAP ROOM 5

N55 NRW MEZZANINE/VALVING AREA 4

N56 NRW 48-0 ELEVATION GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N5A NRW "A" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-1A 5 N5B NRW "B" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-1B 5 N5C NRW CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM 1A 4

N5D NRW HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM 1A 4

N5E NRW CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM 1B 4

N5F NRW HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM 1B 4

N5G NRW CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP SL-P-1A ROOM 5

N5H NRW VALVE GALLERY EAST 4

N5I NRW CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP SL-P-1B ROOM 5

N5J NRW SAMPLE SINK AREA 3

N5K NRW NEUTRALIZATION FEED SKID AREA 3

N5N NRW LAUNDRY/DECON AREA 3

N50 NRW FILTER PRECOAT/BODY FEED ROOM 3

N5P NRW SL-T-2A SPENT RESIN TANK 5

N5Q NRW SL-T-2B SPENT RESIN TANK 5

N5R NRW CONTROL ROOM 3

TLG Services, Inc.

Ojyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 10 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET New Radwaste Building System ComDonents (continued)

N5S NRW BUILDING HVAC ROOM 3

N5T NRW CHEM WASTE/FLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1A 5

N5U NRW CHEM WASTE/FLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1B 5

N5V NRW CHEM WASTEIFLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1C 5

N5W NRW CRANE BAY-STORAGE/LAYDOWN ROOM 3

N5X NRW HIGH PURITY TANK & ROOM 1A 5

N5Y NRW WC-D-1A DEMISTER ROOM 5

N5Z NRW WC-D-1B DEMISTER ROOM 5

PAA OLD RADWASTE BUILDING GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

Old Radwaste Building System Commonents 7BA 1-12 SUMP AREA GENERAL 4

7DA ORW TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 4

7FA ORW AIR FILTER ROOM 5

PBA ORW SMALL PUMP ROOM 5

PDA ORW 35' & 45' CENTRIFUGE AND HOPPER 5

PMA ORW OVERBOARD DISCHARGE MONITOR 3

PRA ORW ROOF GENERAL ALL AREAS 4

PRD ORW FUEL POOL FILTERS / KELLY BUILDING 4

PSB ORW CONTROL ROOM OPERATION AREA 3

PTA ORW COMPACTOR AREA 3

PTK ORW - NORTH ANNEX 3

PTP DRUM STORAGE AREA GENERAL 3

PUA ORW LARGE PUMP ROOM 4

PUU ORW INSIDE TANK ROOM GENERAL 4

PVA ORW NORTH ANNEX KELLY BUILDING 2

UAB ORW OUTSIDE TANKS & MOAT AREA 4

UAS ORW SURGE TANK & PUMP AREA 4

ORW ORW PRE D&D DESLUDGE AND DECON 4

Turbine Building System Components 7CA TURBINE TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 5

TB2 TURBINE BUILDING BASEMENT GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

TB23 TB23 HALLWAY AREA 1

TB38 TB38 HALLWAY AREA 1

TC2 CONDENSER BAY OVERHEAD GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

TD2 CONDENSER BAY DRAIN TANK PIT 3

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 AppendixF, Page 11 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

I I

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Turbine Building System Components (continued)

TE2 TEE TEG TF2 TFG TG2 TH2 TKA TL2 TMA TN2 T02 TOA TOCRIDCA TOR TOV TOW TOX TOY TP2 TP3 TPE TS2 TTA TU2 SPARE EXCITER GENERAL ALL AREAS 4160 VOLT ROOM RCA EXIT FEED PUMP ROOM GENERAL ALL AREAS OFF GAS SAMPLE AREA

, CONDENSATE PUMP PIT HEATER BAY AREA TB EAST AND WEST PASSAGEWAY HI-LO CONDUCTIVITY ROOM MECHANICAL VACUUM PUMP ROOM TB BASEMENT NORTH OPERATING FLOOR HEATER BAY ROOF TURBINE BUILDING CONTROL ROOM TURBINE BYPASS VALVE AREA CONTAMINATED INSTRUMENT SHOP EL.55-4 EL.46-6 WEST ROOF AREA TURBINE RAGEMS II BUILDING TURBINE REPAIR OFFICE CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER AREA CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER TANK ROOM REGEN TANK ROOM ENTRANCE AREA STEAM JET AIR EJECTOR ROOM TRUNNION ROOM GENERAL ALL AREAS TB NORTH MEZZANINE Augmented Offgas SVstem Components AY8 AOG NORTH ACCESS AREA (AYFOGZI)

AYA RECOMBINER ROOM 'A' AYB RECOMBINER ROOM 'B' AYC CHARCOAL ADSORBER ROOM AYE AOG PIPE TUNNEL & SUMP AREA AZ8 REFRIGERATION EQOT AREA ALL AREAS AZA HEPA FILTER ROOM 'A' AZC AOG CONTROL ROOM AREA AZD WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #1 ROOM AZE WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #2 ROOM AZF WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #3 ROOM 3

3 3

3 4

3 3

3 3

3 3

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006,. Rev. 0 Appendix F, Page 12 of 12 TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Augmented Offcas System Components (continued)

AZI AOG BUILDING HVAC ROOM 3

Miscellaneous System Components BAA BBA BDA CAA DAA DAC DGB DOT.

DPH14-6 DPH6-0 DWF FWP GAA GCA MAA MBA MBS MBT MS23-6 MS34-6 MSROOF NMBROOF OB35-0 OB46-6 OBROOF PTB23-6 RSF'ROOF WAA WHS YDA YFA YLA INTAKE STR UYARD YARD AREAS BOILER HOUSE ALL AREAS STACK ALL AREAS RAGEMS I BUILDING CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK CHEMISTRY LA GENERAL ALL AREAS CABLE SPREADING ROOM EL.36-0 DIESEL GENERATOR #1 & #2 W/ STORAGE TANK DIRTY OIL TANK DILUTION PUMP HOUSE DILUTION PUMP HOUSE DOMESTIC WATER FACILITY FRESH WATER PUMP HOUSE NORTH GUARD HOUSE AND PARKING LOT MAIN GATE SECURITY BUILDING AND PARKING LOT NMB ;HOT MACHINE SHOP NMB RWP OFFICE NMB HOT TOOL ROOM RESP MAINT FACILITY MACHINE SHOP HEALTH PHYSICS STORAGE AREA MACHINE SHOP ROOF HOT MACHINE SHOP ROOF AREA OFFICE BUILDING A/B BATTERY ROOM OFFICE BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING ROOF PRETREATMENT BLDG SERVICE HEAD ROOF LLRWSF CONTROL ROOM DRYWELL PROCESSING FACILITY YARD LAUNDRY TRAILER YARD RADWASTE SHIPPING CENTER INTAKE STRUCTURE YARD YARD AREAS 3

1. 3 3

3 3

3 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 3

2 2

2 1

1 1

1 1

1 1

1 2

2 1

2 2

2 1

2 1

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455.006, Rev. 0 Appendix G, Page 1 of 12 APPENDIX G I

WORK AREA DESIGNATION GPU SURVEY TRACKING NUMBER (STN) INDEX TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Appendix G, Page 2 of 12 GPU STN INDEX INDEX REACTOR BUILDING RAA

.RX BLDG.-GENERAL ALL AREAS BELOW 23' ELEVATION RB I

-19' ELEVATION TORUS ROOM-GENERAL ALL AREAS RBB CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP ROOM NE (1-1 & 1-2) AND 1-6 SUMP RBC CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP ROOM SE (1-3 & 1-4) AND 1-7 SUMP RBE CONTROL ROD DRIVE (CRD) SYSTEM PUMP ROOM (RK-04) AND "A" & -C" CORE SPRAY PUMPS RBF RX BLDG. EQUIPMENT DRAIN TANK (RBEDT)

ROOM AND "B" & "D" CORE SPRAY PUMPS RBO INSIDE TORUS-GENERAL ALL AREAS RBS TOP OF TORUS-GENERAL ALL AREAS 23' ELEVATION RCT RCI RC2 RCS RC6 RCA RCB RCD RCG RCJ 23' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS SE AIRLOCK AND STAIRS ELEVATOR PIT RX BLDG. TRUCK (RAILROAD) BAY AIRLOCK DRYWELL LABYRINTH & FRONT OF DRYWELL SHIELD DOORS NORTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME(TORUS ACCESS/NORTH WEST CORNER LAB DRAIN TANK/LAUNDRY (NV-36) DRAIN TANK & PUMP (NV40)

NORTH BANK CRD ACCUMULATORS (HUC'S)

& NORTH WEST ACCESS NORTH CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS (1-1 & 1-2)

CONTROL ROD DRIVE (CRD) SYSTEM FILTER

& VALVING AREA TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 3 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX REACTOR BUILDING 23' ELEVATION - CONTINUED RCM SOUTH CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS (1-3 & 1-4) & FRONT OF TRUCK (RAILROAD) BAY AIRLOCK RCN SOUTH BANK OF CRD ACCUMULATORS (HCU'S)

RCS SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME AREA/

CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMPS /TORUS VACUUM BREAKERS 38' ELEVATION RDM TIP SYSTEM AREA-GENERAL RD8 SHUTDOWN COOLING PUMP ROOM-GENERAL 51' ELEVATION REY 51' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS REC INSTRUMENT RACK RK-03 AREA & CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMPS REF SHUTDOWN COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM REH QA/QC STORAGE AREA & NITROGEN COMPRESSOR AREA REI TOOL CRIB & LAYDOWN AREA REL RX BLDG. CLOSED COOLING WATER (RBCCW)

HEAT EXCHANGER & PUMP AREA REM SOUTH EAST ACCESS AREA REO CLEANUP SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM REQ CLEANUP SYSTEM PUMP AREA RER CLEANUP SYSTEM VALVE NEST RET CLEANUP FILTER SLUDGE TANK ROOM AND HALLWAY REV AREA OVER STEAM TUNNEL REW RK-01 INSTRUMENT RACK REX RK-02 INSTRUMENT RACK TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 4 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX REACTOR BUILDING - CONTINUED 75' ELEVATION RFB SE GENERAL AREA (CLEANUP SURGE TANK IN OVERHEAD)

RFC CLEANUP VALVE AISLE & CONTROL AREA RFF CLEANUP SYSTEM FILTER TANK/RK-05 INSTRUMENT RACK/TANK AREA RFH OLD FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER & PUMP AREA RFJ AUGMENTED (NEW) SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER & PUMP AREA, RFL CONTROL ROD DRIVE (CRD) REBUILD ROOM/

WASH TANK AREA RFN EMERGENCY CONDENSER VALVE (OVERHEAD)

AREAICRD STORAGE & STAGING AREA RFQ 75' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS REW RK-0 1 INSTRUMENT RACK-SEE 5 ' RX BLDG. MAP 95' ELEVATION RGA LICENSED SOURCE STORAGE CAGE RGC NE ACCESS AREA/REACTOR BLDG. CLOSED COOLING WATER (RBCCW) SURGE TANK RGD "A" & "B" EMERGENCY CONDENSER AREA RGF RECIRC SEAL REBUILD ROOM RGI SOUTH EAST AREA RGL SOUTH WEST AREA RGP CLEANUP DEMINERALIZER VAULT RGR LIQUID POISON TO NORTH CORRIDOR RGU 95' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS 119' ELEVATION RHI NORTH FLOOR AREA/SKIMMER SURGE TANK/

OBSERVATION TOWER RH2 WEST FLOOR AREA RH3 119' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 5 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX REACTOR BUILDING 119' ELEVATION - CONTINUED RH4 RX BLDG. CRANE RH5 RX BLDG. ROOF RH6 ELEVATOR CONTROL/EQUIPMENT LANDING AREA RHA REACTOR CAVITY RHB SPENT FUEL POOL RHC NEW FUEL STORAGE RHD EQUIPMENT STORAGE POOL (ESP)

RHJ CASK WASHDOWN/DECONTAMINATION/

NORTH EAST FLOOR AREA RHX -

SOUTH FLOOR AREA..

RHY SOUTH EAST FLOOR AREA RHL REFUEL BRIDGE DRY WELL IGA DRYWELL-GENERAL ALL AREAS IAA 13' ELEVATION-ALL AREAS EXCEPT CRD ROOM IAC 13' ELEVATION - CRD ROOM IBA 23' ELEVATION IBB DRYWELL AIRLOCK ICA 46' ELEVATION IEA 82' ELEVATION RC6 DRYWELL LABYRINTH & FRONT OF DRYWELL SHIELD DOORS TURBINE BUILDING TAA TURBINE BLDG.-GENERAL ALL AREAS TB2 BASEMENT SOUTH-GENERAL ALL AREAS TC2 CONDENSER BAY-GENERAL ALL AREAS TE2 SPARE EXCITER AREA-GENERAL ALL AREAS TEE 4160 VOLT ROOM TEG RAD CON COUNT ROOMITURBINE BLDG. EXIT TF2 FEEDPUMP ROOM-GENERAL ALL AREAS TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 6 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX TURBINE BUILDING - CONTINUED TFG OFF GAS SAMPLE AREA TG2 CONDENSATE PUMP PIT-GENERAL ALL AREAS TH2 HEATER BAY-GENERAL ALL AREAS TKA NE PASSAGEWAY & NE HALLWAY TL2 HI/LO CONDUCTIVITY ROOM-GENERAL ALL AREAS TMA MECHANICAL VACUUM PUMP ROOM TN2 BASEMENT NORTH-GENERAL ALL AREAS T02 TURBINE BLDG. OPERATING FLOOR (TBOF)-

GENERAL ALL AREAS TOW WEST & NORTH WEST ROOF AREA TOX TURBINE RAGEMS BUILDIN4G TOY TURBINE REPAIR OFFICE TOA HEATER BAY ROOF TOS TURBINE FLOOR TOOL ROOM

.TOV CONTAMINATED (HOT) I & C SHOP.

TOR BYPASS VALVE AREA BELOW TBOF TP2 CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER CONTROL ROOM-ALL AREAS TP3 CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER TANK ROOM-ALL AREAS TPE CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER REGEN TANK ROOM-ALL AREAS TS2 STEAM JET AIR EJECTOR ROOM-ALL AREAS TrA TRUNNION ROOM-GENERAL ALL AREAS TU2 NORTH MEZZANINE-ALL AREAS NEW RAD WASTE N2G NEW RAD WASTE-GENERAL ALL AREAS N2P PENTHOUSE & ROOF 23' ELEVATION N38 23' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS N3A TRUCK BAY & CATALYST/PROCESSING ROOM N3D FILL AISLE/LINER STORAGE & RB2 CONTROL PANEL

.TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 7 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX NEW RAD WASTE 23' ELEVATION - CONTINUED N31

1. 2 SUMP ROOM - DS-P-4A, DS-P-4B N3N SOUTH OPERATING GALLERYNVALVE AREA/

PIPE CHASE N3P HP-P-IA HIGH PURITY PUMP ROOM N3Q WC-P-IB WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM N3R VALVE AREA WEST/WASTE CHEM VALVE AREA N3S WC-P-IA WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM N3T

1. 1 SUMP ROOM DS-P-3A, DS-P-3B N3U "A" EVAPORATOR N3W "B" EVAPORATOR N3Y NRW HEAT EXCHANGER BLDG.-GENERAL ALL AREAS 7EB 1-3 SUMP 38' ELEVATION N48 38' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS N4A "A" HOLD-UP TANK/SL-T-3A ROOM (ACCESS FROM FILL AISLE)

N4B "B" HOLD-UP TANK/SL-T-3B ROOM (ACCESS FROM FILL AISLE)

N4D PIPEIVALVE GALLERY SOUTH & EAST N4E LARGE CONTAINER FILL SKID ROOM SL-Y-6 N4F CLW PROCESS VALVE AREA N4G CLW VALVING ROOM N4H SPENT RESIN TRANSFER PIPING ROOM N4K SPENT RESIN VALVE GALLERY N4L PIPE GALLERY WESTNVALVE AREA RESURGE REGEN 48' & 58' ELEVATIONS N5 I HP-D-IA DEMINERALIZER ROOM N52 HP-F-2A RESIN TRAP ROOM N53 HP-D-IB DEMINERALIZER ROOM N54 HP-F-2B RESIN TRAP ROOM N55 MEZZANINEIVALVING AREA-58'ELEVATION TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 8 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX NEW RAD WASTE 48' & 58' ELEVATIONS - CONTINUED N56 48' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS N5A "A" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-IA I

N5B

-B" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-IB N5C WC-F-IA CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM N5D HP-F-1A HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM N5E WC-F-IB CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM N5F HP-F-lB HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM N5G CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP S-P-IA ROOM NSH SL-T-IA/lB VALVE ALLEY N51 CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP S-P-1B ROOM N5J SAMPLE SINK AREA N5K NEUTRALIZATION FEED SKID AREA N5N

' LAUNDRY/DECON AREA N50 FILTER PRECOAT/BODY FEED ROOM N5P SL-T-2A SPENT RESIN TANK N5Q SL-.T-2B SPENT RESIN TANK N5R CONTROL ROOM (NEW RAD WASTE)

NSS HVAC ROOM N5T WC-T-IA CHEM WASTE/FLOOR DRAIN TANK NSU WC-T-1B CHEM WASTE/FLOOR DRAIN TANK N5V WC-T-IC CHEM WASTE/FLOOR DRAIN TANK N5W CRANE BAY/STORAGE LAYDOWN AREA N5X HP-T-1A HIGH PURITY TANK ROOM N5Y WC-D-IA DEMISTER ROOM

.N5Z WC-D-1B DEM]STER ROOM 7EB 1-3 SUMP TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 9 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX OLD RAD WASTE PAA OLD RAD WASTE-GENERAL ALL AREAS PBA SMALL PUMP ROOM - ALL AREAS PDA 35' & 45' ELEVATION-CENTRIFUGE & HOPPER ROOMS -ALL AREAS PMA OVERBOARD DISCHARGE MONITOR PRD KELLY BLDG. /NV-37 FUEL POOL FILTERS PRA ROOF-ALL AREAS PSB CONTROL ROOM (OLD RAD WASTE) & PRECOAT ROOM-ALL AREAS PTA COMPACTOR ROOM-ALL AREAS PTK NORTH ACCESS OPERATING AISLE PTP DRUM STORAGE & SCAFFOLD PLANNING-ALL AREAS PUA LARGE PUMP ROOM & MEZZANINE-ALL AREAS PUU TANK ROOM-ALL AREAS PVA NORTH ANNEX KELLY BLDG.

AUGMENTED OFF GAS (AOG) 23' ELEVATION AXA AOG -GENERAL ALL AREAS AY8 23' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS AYA "A" RECOMBINER ROOM AYB "B" RECOMBINER ROOM AYC CHARCOAL ABSORBER ROOM AYE PIPE TUNNEL & SUMP AREA 38' ELEVATION AZ8 38' ELEVATION-GENERAL ALL AREAS AZA HEPA FILTER ROOM AZC CONTROL ROOM (AOG)

AZD

1. 1 WATER REMOVAL TRAIN ROOM AZE

1. 2 WATER REMOVAL TRAIN ROOM AZF

1. 3 WATER REMOVAL TRAIN ROOM TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 10 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX AUGMENTED OFF GAS (AOGM 38' ELEVATION - CONTINUED AZH FLAME ARRESTOR ROOM AZI HVAC ROOM AZJ 38' STAIRWELL & LANDING AREA YARD YAA YARD-GENERAL ALL AREAS YDA DRYWELL (DW) PROCESS FACIUTY &

BRIEF AREA YFA LAUNDRY TRAILERS YHA RCTIGATE 20 TRAILER YKA SCAFFOLD STORAGE SHED YLA SHIPPING SURVEYS BAA BOILER HOUSE-ALL AREAS BBA STACK - ALL AREAS BCA STACK PAD - ALL AREAS BDA RAGEMS BUILDING-GENERAL ALL AREAS PPA NRW PUMP HOUSE - ALL AREAS UAB ORW OUTSIDE TANK MOAT AREA (HP-T-2A/2B

& WC-T-3A/3B)

UAS ORW SURGE TANK NV-04 & PUMP AREA 7BA 1-12 SUMP AREA - GENERAL ALL AREAS 7CA TURBINE & RX BLDG. TUNNELS-GENERAL ALL AREAS 7DA ORW TUNNEL-GENERAL ALL AREAS 7EB NRW TUNNEL-GENERAL ALL AREAS & 1-3 SUMP 7FA HEPA FILTER ROOM UNDER ORW 7EB NRW 1-3 SUMP CONDENSATE TRANSFER/TORUS WATER STORAGE CAA CONDENSATE WATER STORAGE TANK/

TORUS WATER STORAGE TANK (TWST) -

GENERAL ALL AREAS TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 11 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX CONDENSATE TRANSFER/TORUS WATER STORAGE - CONTINUED CBA CONDENSATE TRANSFER PUMP HOUSE -

GENERAL ALL AREAS MAC/NEW MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAA HOT MACHINE SHOP MAB CLEAN TOOL ROOM MBA RWP OFFICE/MAC MBS HOT TOOL ROOM MBT RESPIRATOR MAINTENANCE FACILITY MGG NEW MAINTENANCE BLDG.-GENERAL ALL AREAS LOW LEVEL RAD WASTE WAA LOW LEVEL RAD WASTE STORAGE FACILITY MAIN OFFICE/SERVICE BUILDING DAA CHEM LAB/PASS ROOM DBA 480 VOLT ROOM DCA CONTROL ROOM DDA THIRD FLOOR M&C/EXIT DEA MAIN OFFICE BLDG. ROOF DFA OLD CABLE SPREADING ROOM DQQ BATTERY ROOM/MG SET ROOM/

NEW CABLE SPREADING ROOM/OPS COORDINATION OFFICE/OFFICE BLDG.J SERVICE BLDG.-GENERAL ALL AREAS MISCELLANEOUS GAA NORTH GATE GUARD HOUSE & NORTH PARKING LOT TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1455-006,.Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 12 of 12 GPU STN INDEX (Continued)

INDEX MISCELLANEOUS - CONTINUED GCA MAIN GATE GUARD HOUSE & MAIN PARKING LOT XEA AUXILIARY OFFICE BUILDING (AOB)

RAD CON & SAFETY XFA BLDG. 3 - STATION SERVICES (SSY INSTRUMENT & CALIBRATION (I&C) SHOP/

FIRE PROTECTION DEPT.-NOT INCLUDING COUNTROOM/TURBINEBLDG. EXIT)

XGA SITE EMERGENCY BUILDING (SEB)

XIA TOOL CALIBRATION TRAILER (OLD SS TRAILER)

XJA REFUEL CAFE XLA MAINTENANCE FAB SHOPS XMA WAREHOUSE YCA AUXILIARY OFFICE BLDG. (AOB) CHEMISTRY LAB YJA BLDG. 4/MECHANICAL WELDING SHOP YSA RADIAC TRAILER ZFA CONTRACTOR TRAILERS90-105 @ NORTH GATE ZHA TRAILER 300 COMPLEX @ NORTH GATE ZJA FORKED RIVER SITE QQQ MISCELLANEOUS - GENERAL ALL AREAS TLG Services, Inc.