RA-14-104, Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Spent Fuel Management Plan

Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Spent Fuel Management Plan

ML14365A067
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	12/30/2014
From:	Jim Barstow Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
RA-14-104
Download: ML14365A067 (185)

Text

RA-14-104 10 CFR 50.54(bb) 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3)

December 30, 2014 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Spent Fuel Management Plan

Reference:

1)

Letter from John G. Lamb (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) to Michael J. Pacilio (Exelon Generation Company, LLC), "Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Information Regarding Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports," dated September 17, 2014 (ML14252A703)

2)

Letter RA-11-007 from Keith R. Jury (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Permanent Cessation of Operations at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," dated January 7, 2011 (ML110070507)

Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) is submitting this letter to provide a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(f)(3) and spent fuel management plan pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb)1 for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS).

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.75, "Reporting and recordkeeping for decommissioning planning," paragraph (f)(3), "Each power reactor licensee shall at or about 5 years prior to the projected end of operations submit a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate which includes an up-to-date assessment of the major factors that could affect the cost to decommission." of this submittal contains a preliminary decommissioning cost estimate for OCNGS. The cost estimate is a preliminary estimate of anticipated costs and will be updated at various times as deemed appropriate by OCNGS and/or in compliance with regulatory requirements. The attached preliminary decommissioning cost estimate assumes that OCNGS permanently terminates operations on December 31, 2019, in accordance with the Reference 2 letter.

1 Section 50.54(bb) requires that licensees submit a spent fuel management plan to the NRC within two years following permanent shutdown or five years prior to the expiration of the operating license. The operating license for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station expires in 2029. In Reference 2, Exelon provided notice of its intention to permanently cease operations effective December 31, 2019. As a result, Exelon is providing its spent fuel management plan within five years of the shutdown date.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Spent Fuel Management Plan Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 December 30, 2014 Page 2 The major factors that could affect the cost estimate as well as contingencies to allow for unknown or unplanned occurrences during decommissioning are included in the attached preliminary decommissioning cost estimate. Additionally, soil and ground water remediation costs are included in the cost estimate. The required soil remediation is based on a report that evaluated the known or suspected contaminated soil at OCNGS as of January 2004 and evaluation of subsequent 10 CFR 50.75(g)(1) reports.

The attached preliminary decommissioning cost estimate evaluates three (3) options for decommissioning OCNGS. Exelon has not made a final determination of the decommissioning approach for OCNGS. For the purpose of choosing a decommissioning option to demonstrate adequacy of funding to meet regulatory requirements, the SAFSTOR option has been selected. Exelon reserves the right to choose a decommissioning option in accordance with its business needs, recognizing that it needs to assure the chosen option meets U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements for decommissioning funding.

As discussed in 10 CFR 50.54(bb), Conditions of licenses, paragraph (bb), a licensee shall submit written notification to the Commission for its review and preliminary approval of the program by which the licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor until title to the irradiated fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy for its ultimate disposal in a repository.

Accordingly, Attachment 2 of this submittal includes the Spent Fuel Management Plan for NRC review and preliminary approval.

contains the projected annual cash flow required for decommissioning OCNGS based on the SAFSTOR scenario from the Attachment 1 cost estimate. (The cost estimate is in thousands of 2011 dollars. The Attachment 1 costs have been escalated to 2014 dollars in Attachment 3.) The costs for radiological decommissioning (license termination costs), spent fuel management, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) decommissioning, and site restoration (non-radiological decommissioning) are reflected in Attachment 3. Exelon recognizes that an exemption from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) is required to use decommissioning trust funds for expenses other than decommissioning activities as the term decommissioning is defined in 10 CFR 50.2.

contains the projected annual cash flow from the OCNGS decommissioning trust fund for decommissioning the site (including radiological decommissioning, spent fuel management, ISFSI decommissioning, and site restoration) based on the SAFSTOR scenario from the Attachment 1 cost estimate. The cash flow analysis conservatively assumes all expenses in a year are incurred at the beginning of year (i.e., beginning of year convention) during the decommissioning period.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Submittal of Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate and Spent Fuel Management Plan Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 December 30, 2014 Page 3 As of November 30, 2014, OCNGS decommissioning trust fund balances totaled $869.9 million. Escalated at 2% annual real rate of return to November 30, 2019, the trust fund will amount to $960.5 million before deducting decommissioning expenses, which exceeds the amount required to complete decommissioning of the site under the SAFSTOR scenario of the attached preliminary cost estimate.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(bb), a copy of this notification will be maintained until the expiration of the OCNGS operating license. Additionally, OCNGS will notify the NRC of any significant changes in the proposed Spent Fuel Management Plan described in.

There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Richard Gropp at 610-765-5557.

Respectfully, James Barstow Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC -

Preliminary Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station -

Spent Fuel Management Plan for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station -

Annual SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Cash Flow for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station -

Annual SAFSTOR Decommissioning Fund Cash Flow for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station cc:

Regional Administrator - NRC Region I NRG Senior Resident Inspector - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Project Manager - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Director, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Mayor of Lacey Township, Forked River, New Jersey

ATTACHMENT 1 PRELIMINARY DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 DECOMMISSIONING COST ANALYSIS for the OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION prepared for Exelon Generation Company LLC prepared by TLG Services, Inc.

Bridgewater, Connecticut December 2014

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page ii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

APPROVALS Project Manager William A. Cloutier, Jr.

Date Project Engineer John A. Carlson Date Technical Manager Francis W. Seymore Date

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

............................................................................... vii-xix

1.

INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Objectives of Study........................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Site Description................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Regulatory Guidance........................................................................................ 1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act...................................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts...................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination.................................... 1-8

2.

DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES.......................................................... 2-1 2.1 DECON.............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations......................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 - Decommissioning Operations.............................................. 2-5 2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration.................................................................... 2-8 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning............................................ 2-9 2.2 SAFSTOR AND DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING................................... 2-10 2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations....................................................................... 2-10 2.2.2 Period 2 - Dormancy............................................................................ 2-11 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning..................................... 2-12 2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration.................................................................. 2-14

3.

COST ESTIMATE................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Basis of Estimate.............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Methodology...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Financial Components of the Cost Model....................................................... 3-3 3.3.1 Contingency........................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 Financial Risk........................................................................................ 3-6 3.4 Site-Specific Considerations............................................................................. 3-7 3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management....................................................................... 3-7 3.4.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components........................................... 3-9 3.4.3 Primary System Components............................................................. 3-11 3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser............................................................. 3-11 3.4.5 Transportation Methods..................................................................... 3-11 3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal............................................. 3-12 3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning.................................... 3-13

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page iv of xix TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE 3.5 Assumptions.................................................................................................... 3-14 3.5.1 Estimating Basis................................................................................. 3-14 3.5.2 Labor Costs.......................................................................................... 3-14 3.5.3 Design Conditions................................................................................ 3-15 3.5.4 General................................................................................................. 3-15 3.6 Cost Estimate Summary............................................................................... 3-17

4.

SCHEDULE ESTIMATE...................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Schedule Estimate Assumptions..................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Project Schedule................................................................................................ 4-2

5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES..................................................................................... 5-1

6.

RESULTS................................................................................................................. 6-1

7.

REFERENCES........................................................................................................ 7-1 TABLES Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, DECON.............................. xvii Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, Delayed DECON............... xviii Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, SAFSTOR............................ xix 3.1 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, DECON................................................. 3-18 3.2 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, Delayed DECON................................... 3-19 3.3 Schedule of Annual Expenditures, SAFSTOR.............................................. 3-20 5.1 Decommissioning Waste Summary, DECON................................................. 5-3 5.2 Decommissioning Waste Summary, Delayed DECON................................... 5-4 5.3 Decommissioning Waste Summary, SAFSTOR.............................................. 5-5 6.1 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, DECON............................... 6-4 6.2 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, Delayed DECON................. 6-5 6.3 Summary of Decommissioning Cost Elements, SAFSTOR............................ 6-6

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page v of xix TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

SECTION PAGE FIGURES 4.1 DECON Activity Schedule................................................................................ 4-3 4.2 Decommissioning Timeline, DECON.............................................................. 4-5 4.3 Decommissioning Timeline, Delayed DECON................................................ 4-6 4.4 Decommissioning Timeline, SAFSTOR.......................................................... 4-7 APPENDICES A.

Unit Cost Factor Development............................................................................. A-1 B.

Unit Cost Factor Listing...................................................................................... B-1 C.

Detailed Cost Analysis, DECON.......................................................................... C-1 D.

Detailed Cost Analysis, Delayed DECON........................................................... D-1 E.

Detailed Cost Analysis, SAFSTOR...................................................................... E-1 F.

Work Difficulty Factor Adjustments..................................................................... F-1 G.

Work Area Designation - GPU STN Index......................................................... G-1

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page vi of xix TLG Services, Inc.

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page vii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

This report presents updated estimates of the cost to decommission the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) for the identified decommissioning scenarios following a scheduled cessation of plant operations. The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information, originally developed in an evaluation for the GPU Nuclear Corporation in 1997-99,[1] revised in subsequent evaluations in 2003-04[2] and 2008-09,[3] and finally updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear unit and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects. The updated estimates are designed to provide Exelon Generation Company (Exelon) with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.

The primary goal of the decommissioning is the removal and disposal of the contaminated systems and structures so that the plants operating license can be terminated. The analysis recognizes that spent fuel will be stored at the site in the plants storage pool and/or in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) until such time that it can be transferred to a Department of Energy (DOE) facility.

Consequently, the estimates also include those costs to manage and subsequently decommission such storage facilities.

The estimates are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, site restoration requirements, and project contingencies.

The estimates incorporate a

minimum cooling period of approximately five and one-half years for the spent fuel that resides in the reactor building storage pool when operations cease. The estimates also include the dismantling of non-essential structures and limited restoration of the site.

Alternatives and Regulations The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule adopted on June 27, 1988.[4] In this rule, 1

Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Document No.

G01-1271-003, TLG Services, Inc., February 1999 2

Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Document No.

E16-1455-006, Rev. 0, TLG Services, Inc., March 2004 3

Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Document No.

E11-1555-010, TLG Services, Inc., Rev. 1, March 2009 4

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72 "General Requirements for

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page viii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

the NRC set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities. The regulations addressed planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements for decommissioning. The rule also defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB.

DECON is defined as "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations."[5]

SAFSTOR is defined as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."[6] Decommissioning is to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety.

ENTOMB is defined as "the alternative in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete; the entombed structure is appropriately maintained and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactive material decays to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property."[7] As with the SAFSTOR alternative, decommissioning is currently required to be completed within 60 years.

The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality for the ENTOMB alternative at commercial reactors that generate significant amounts of long-lived radioactive material. In 1997, the Commission directed its staff to re-evaluate this alternative and identify the technical requirements and regulatory actions that would be necessary for entombment to become a viable option. The resulting evaluation provided several recommendations, however, rulemaking has been deferred based upon several factors (e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the entombment option, the unresolved issues associated with the disposition of greater-than-Class C material (GTCC), and the NRCs current priorities) at least until after the additional research studies are complete. The Commission concurred with the staffs recommendation.

Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 5 Ibid. Page FR24022, Column 3 6

Ibid.

7 Ibid. Page FR24023, Column 2

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page ix of xix TLG Services, Inc.

In 1996 the NRC amended its decommissioning regulations to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process.[8] The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning. Regulatory Guide 1.184, issued in July 2000, further described the methods and procedures acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing the requirements of the 1996 amendments relating to the initial activities and major phases of the decommissioning process. The costs and schedules presented in this analysis follow the general guidance and processes described in these regulations.

Decommissioning Scenarios The following scenarios were evaluated and are representative of the alternatives available to the owner. The current operating license expires in 2029; however, this study assumes that the plant will retire in 2019.

1.

DECON: Decommissioning activities commence shortly after the cessation of plant operations. The spent fuel in the plants spent fuel storage pool is transferred to the ISFSI within five and one-half years. The equipment, structures, and portions of the plant containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the facility to be released for unrestricted use. Non-essential structures are then demolished. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site (ISFSI) until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2036.

2.

Delayed DECON: In the second scenario, the unit is shutdown and prepared for dismantling similar to the DECON scenario; however, in this scenario, the unit enters an abbreviated period of storage prior to the actual start of field activities. The spent fuel discharged to the storage pool once operations cease remains in the pool until it can be transferred to a DOE facility. The ISFSI, used to support operations, is not used to off-load the storage pool.

Decommissioning is delayed until the transfer of the fuel from both the pool and ISFSI to the DOE is completed in the year 2036. The unit is then decommissioned.

3.

SAFSTOR: The unit is placed into safe-storage in the third scenario.

Decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the required 60-year period. The spent fuel in the plants spent fuel storage pool is 8 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50, and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," NRC, Federal Register Volume 61, (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page x of xix TLG Services, Inc.

transferred to the ISFSI within five and one-half years. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2036. The plant remains in safe-storage following the removal of spent fuel from the site, timed to allow final decommissioning and license termination to be completed within 60 years of final shutdown. As with the first two scenarios, decommissioning activities are sequenced and integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling process.

Methodology The methodology used to develop the estimates described within this document follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines [9]

developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute). This reference describes a unit factor method for determining decommissioning activity costs. The unit factors used in this analysis incorporate site-specific costs and the latest available information on worker productivity in decommissioning.

An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule. The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, and support services such as quality control and security. This systematic approach for assembling decommissioning estimates ensures a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the resulting cost estimate.

Contingency Consistent with standard cost estimating practice, contingencies are applied to the decontamination and dismantling costs as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope, particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur.[10] The cost elements in the estimates are based on ideal conditions; therefore, the types of unforeseeable events that are almost certain to occur in decommissioning, based on industry experience, are addressed through a percentage contingency applied on a line-item basis. This contingency factor is a nearly universal element in all large-scale construction and demolition projects. It should be noted that contingency, as 9

T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986 10 Project and Cost Engineers Handbook, Second Edition, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, p. 239

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xi of xix TLG Services, Inc.

used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.

The use and role of contingency within decommissioning estimates is not a safety factor issue. Safety factors provide additional security and address situations that may never occur. Contingency funds, by contrast, are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. Inclusion of contingency is necessary to provide assurance that sufficient funding will be available to accomplish the intended tasks.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for shallow-land disposal. With the passage of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act in 1980,[11] and its Amendments of 1985,[12] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders.

New Jersey is a member of the three-state Atlantic Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact, formed after South Carolina formally joined the Northeast Regional Compact.

The Barnwell Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility located in South Carolina is expected to be available to support the decommissioning of Oyster Creek. It is also assumed that Exelon can access other disposal sites, should it prove cost-effective. As such, rate schedules for both the Barnwell and the EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah are used to generate disposal costs.

For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions facility is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the lowest level and majority of the radioactive waste (Class A [13]). EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. The disposal cost for this material is based upon the rate schedule for the Barnwell facility.

The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)). The Low-Level 11 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980, Public Law 96-573, 1980 12 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, Public Law 99-240, 1986 13 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material. The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance. As such, the GTCC radioactive waste in this study is assumed to be packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.

The GTCC material is either stored with the spent fuel at the ISFSI or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning).

A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials. This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery. Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Oyster Creek reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.

High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal governments long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998; however, to date no progress in the removal of spent fuel from commercial generating sites has been made.

Today, the country is at an impasse on high-level waste disposal, even with the License Application for a geologic repository submitted by the DOE to the NRC in 2008. The current Administration has cut the budget for the repository program while promising to conduct a comprehensive review of policies for managing the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle and make recommendations for a new plan.[14]

Towards this goal, the Administration appointed a Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future (Blue Ribbon Commission) to make recommendations for 14 Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future Charter, http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/brc/20120620215336/http://brc.gov/index.php?q=page/charter

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xiii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

a new plan for nuclear waste disposal. The Blue Ribbon Commissions charter includes a requirement that it consider [o]ptions for safe storage of used nuclear fuel while final disposition pathways are selected and deployed.[15]

On January 26, 2012, the Blue Ribbon Commission issued its Report to the Secretary of Energy containing a number of recommendations on nuclear waste disposal. Two of the recommendations that may impact decommissioning planning are:

[T]he United States [should] establish a program that leads to the timely development of one or more consolidated storage facilities[16]

[T]he United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste.[17]

In January 2013, the DOE issued the Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, in response to the recommendations made by the Blue Ribbon Commission and as a framework for moving toward a sustainable program to deploy an integrated system capable of transporting, storing, and disposing of used nuclear fuel...[18]

With the appropriate authorizations from Congress, the Administration currently plans to implement a program over the next 10 years that:

Sites, designs and licenses, constructs and begins operations of a pilot interim storage facility by 2021 with an initial focus on accepting used nuclear fuel from shut-down reactor sites; Advances toward the siting and licensing of a larger interim storage facility to be available by 2025 that will have sufficient capacity to provide flexibility in the waste management system and allows for acceptance of enough used nuclear fuel to reduce expected government liabilities; and 15 Ibid.

16 Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy, http://www.brc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/brc_finalreport_jan2012.pdf, p. 32, January 2012 17 Ibid., p.27 18 Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, U.S. DOE, January 11, 2013

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xiv of xix TLG Services, Inc.

Makes demonstrable progress on the siting and characterization of repository sites to facilitate the availability of a geologic repository by 2048.[19]

The NRCs review of DOEs license application to construct a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain was suspended in 2011 when the Administration slashed the budget for completing that work. However, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently issued a writ of mandamus (in August 2013) [20]

ordering NRC to comply with federal law and restart its review of DOE's Yucca Mountain repository license application to the extent of previously appropriated funding for the review.

Completion of the decommissioning process is dependent upon the DOEs ability to remove spent fuel from the site in a timely manner. DOEs repository program had assumed that spent fuel allocations would be accepted for disposal from the nations commercial nuclear plants, with limited exceptions, in the order (the queue) in which it was discharged from the reactor.[21] With a large fleet of reactors, Exelon may be able to re-assign allocations between its units to minimize on-site storage costs.

Assuming a 2025 start date for DOE initiating transfer of commercial spent fuel to a federal facility (based upon the proposed timeline for the availability of the larger interim storage facility), the assemblies generated from Oyster Creek operations are projected to be shipped from the Oyster Creek site in the years 2034 through 2036 (assuming the cessation of plant operations in 2019). This equates to 76 multi-purpose canisters (at 61 assemblies per canister).

An ISFSI, operated under a Part 50 General License (in accordance with 10 CFR 72, Subpart K[22]), has been constructed to support continued plant operations. This 19 Ibid., p.2 20 United States Court of Appeals for the District Of Columbia Circuit, In Re: Aiken County, et al, August 2013 http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/BAE0CF34F762EBD985257BC6004DEB 18/$file/11-1271-1451347.pdf 21 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 961.11, Article IV - Responsibilities of the Parties, B. DOE Responsibilities, 5.(a) DOE shall issue an annual acceptance priority ranking for receipt of SNF and/or HLW at the DOE repository. This priority ranking shall be based on the age of SNF and/or HLW as calculated from the date of discharge of such materials from the civilian nuclear power reactor. The oldest fuel or waste will have the highest priority for acceptance 22 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 72, Subpart K, General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xv of xix TLG Services, Inc.

analysis assumes that the facility can be expanded to support decommissioning operations (in the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios).

The spent fuel in the wet storage pools at the cessation of plant operations is expected to be transferred to the ISFSI (DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios) within the first five and one-half years following shutdown. Once the wet storage pool is emptied, the reactor building can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. The pool is kept operational in the Delayed DECON scenario until the spent fuel stored in the pool can be transferred to the DOE.

Exelons strongly held position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Oyster Creeks fuel in a timely manner and consistent with its contract commitments. No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim. However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient decommissioning funds at the end of the stations life if the DOE has not met its contractual obligation to take the fuel.

Site Restoration The efficient removal of the contaminated materials at the site will result in damage to many of the site structures. Blasting, coring, drilling, and the other decontamination activities will substantially damage power block structures, potentially weakening the footings and structural supports. Prompt demolition once the license is terminated is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized is more efficient and less costly than if the process were deferred. Experience at shutdown generating stations has shown that plant facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public and the demolition work force.

Consequently, this analysis assumes that non-essential site structures within the restricted access area are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below the local grade level wherever possible. The site is then graded and stabilized.

Summary The costs to decommission Oyster Creek were evaluated for several decommissioning scenarios, incorporating the attributes of both the DECON and SAFSTOR decommissioning alternatives. Regardless of the timing of the decommissioning activities, the estimates assume the eventual removal of all the contaminated and activated plant components and structural materials, such that

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xvi of xix TLG Services, Inc.

the facility operator may then have unrestricted use of the site with no further requirement for an operating license. Delayed decommissioning is initiated after the spent fuel has been removed from the site and is accomplished within the 60-year period required by current NRC regulations. In the interim, the spent fuel remains in storage at the site until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility can be completed. Once the transfer is complete, the storage facilities are also decommissioned.

The scenarios analyzed for the purpose of generating the estimates are described in Section 2. The assumptions are presented in Section 3, along with schedules of annual expenditures. The major cost contributors are identified in Section 6, with detailed activity costs, waste volumes, and associated manpower requirements delineated in Appendices C, D, and E. Cost summaries for the various scenarios are provided at the end of this section for the major cost components.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xvii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DECON (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Total Decontamination 22,297 Removal 148,522 Packaging 22,786 Transportation 17,598 Waste Disposal 64,400 Off-site Waste Processing 10,024 Program Management [1]

417,042 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 Spent Fuel Management[2]

100,110 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 20,929 Energy 13,156 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 19,885 Property Taxes 21,212 Miscellaneous Equipment 6,800 Site O&M 3,127 Total [3]

899,710 Cost Element NRC License Termination 665,975 Spent Fuel Management 177,146 Site Restoration 56,589 Total [3]

899,710

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xviii of xix TLG Services, Inc.

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DELAYED DECON (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Total Decontamination 23,573 Removal 134,505 Packaging 17,207 Transportation 13,288 Waste Disposal 39,463 Off-site Waste Processing 11,541 Program Management [1]

501,758 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 Spent Fuel Management[2]

37,454 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 25,123 Energy 18,772 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 21,402 Property Taxes 25,586 Miscellaneous Equipment 10,399 Site O&M 8,327 Total [3]

900,219 Cost Element NRC License Termination 541,703 Spent Fuel Management 299,125 Site Restoration 59,390 Total [3]

900,219

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Page xix of xix TLG Services, Inc.

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS SAFSTOR (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Total Decontamination 23,321 Removal 137,788 Packaging 16,136 Transportation 11,848 Waste Disposal 37,361 Off-site Waste Processing 11,589 Program Management [1]

556,588 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 Spent Fuel Management[2]

96,744 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 57,478 Energy 24,479 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 21,402 Property Taxes 68,922 Miscellaneous Equipment 18,942 Site O&M 21,895 Total [3]

1,116,314 Cost Element NRC License Termination 873,828 Spent Fuel Management 183,117 Site Restoration 59,369 Total [3]

1,116,314

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 1 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

1. INTRODUCTION This report presents updated estimates of the cost to decommission the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek), for the scenarios described in Section 2, following a scheduled cessation of plant operations. The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information from an earlier evaluation prepared in 2008-09,[1] updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear unit and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects. The current estimates are designed to provide Exelon Generation Company (Exelon),

with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear unit. It is not a detailed engineering document, but a financial analysis prepared in advance of the detailed engineering that will be required to carry out the decommissioning 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY The objectives of this study are to prepare comprehensive estimates of the cost to decommission Oyster Creek, to provide a sequence or schedule for the associated activities, and to develop waste stream projections from the decontamination and dismantling activities. The plants operating license currently expires on April 9, 2029; however, this study assumes that the plant will be retired on December 31, 2019.

1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION The Oyster Creek nuclear unit is about two miles inland from the shore of Barnegat Bay on the coast of New Jersey. The site is approximately nine miles south of Toms River, New Jersey; about fifty miles east of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and sixty miles south of Newark, New Jersey. The generating station is comprised of a single reactor with supporting facilities.

Oyster Creek was designed and constructed by the General Electric Company Atomic Power Equipment Department as a turnkey project. The reactor is a single-cycle, forced circulation boiling water reactor producing steam for direct use in the steam turbine. The reactor vessel and the recirculation system are contained within the drywell of a pressure absorption containment system housed within the reactor building. The primary containment system consists of the drywell, vent pipes, and a pool of water contained in the absorption chamber (torus). The reactor building encloses the primary containment system, thereby providing a secondary containment.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 2 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek presently operates under a full term operating license at a maximum thermal power level of about 1930 MWth with a corresponding gross electrical output of approximately 670 MWe. Heat produced in the reactor is converted to electrical energy by the steam and power conversion system. A turbine-generator system converts the thermal energy of steam produced by the reactor into mechanical shaft power and then into electrical energy. The turbine consists of a high-pressure, double-flow turbine element and three double-flow, low-pressure turbine elements all aligned in tandem. The generator is a direct-driven 60 Hertz, 24,000 volt, conductor-cooled, synchronous generator rated at 687,500 kVA. The turbine is operated in a closed feedwater cycle which condenses the steam; the heated feedwater is returned to the reactor. Heat rejected in the main condensers is removed by the circulating water system.

The circulating water system provides the heat sink required for removal of waste heat in the power plants thermal cycle. Water is drawn from Barnegat Bay through a 140 foot wide intake canal which follows the general course of the south branch of Forked River. The system has the principal function of removing heat by absorbing this energy in the main condenser. After passing through the plant condensers, the water is routed through the discharge canal which empties into Barnegat Bay.

1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," issued in June 1988.[2]* This rule set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities.

The regulation addressed decommissioning planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements. The intent of the rule was to ensure that decommissioning would be accomplished in a safe and timely manner and that adequate funds would be available for this purpose.

Subsequent to the rule, the NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.159, Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,[3] which provided additional guidance to the licensees of nuclear facilities on the financial methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the requirements of the rule. The regulatory guide addressed the funding requirements and provided guidance on the content and form of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule.

• Annotated references for citations in Sections 1-6 are provided in Section 7.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 3 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

The rule defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. The DECON alternative assumes that any contaminated or activated portion of the plants systems, structures, and facilities are removed or decontaminated to levels that permit the site to be released for unrestricted use shortly after the cessation of plant operations.

The rule also placed limits on the time allowed to complete the decommissioning process. For SAFSTOR, the process is restricted in overall duration to 60 years, unless it can be shown that a longer duration is necessary to protect public health and safety. The guidelines for ENTOMB are similar, providing the NRC with both sufficient leverage and flexibility to ensure that these deferred options are only used in situations where it is reasonable and consistent with the definition of decommissioning. At the conclusion of a 60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB if the NRC approves such a case), the site would still require significant remediation to meet the unrestricted release limits for license termination.

The ENTOMB alternative has not been viewed as a viable option for power reactors due to the significant time required to isolate the long-lived radionuclides for decay to permissible levels. However, with recent rulemaking permitting the controlled release of a site, the NRC has re-evaluated this alternative.[4] The resulting feasibility study, based upon an assessment by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, concluded that the method did have conditional merit for some, if not most, reactors. However, the staff also found that additional rulemaking would be needed before this option could be treated as a generic alternative. The NRC had considered rulemaking to alter the 60-year time for completing decommissioning and to clarify the use of engineered barriers for reactor entombments.[5] However, the NRCs staff has recommended that rulemaking be deferred, based upon several factors, e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the entombment option, the unresolved issues associated with the disposition of greater-than-Class C material (GTCC), and the NRCs current priorities, at least until after the additional research studies are complete. The Commission concurred with the staffs recommendation.

The NRC published amendments to its decommissioning regulations in 1996.[6]

When the regulations were originally adopted in 1988, it was assumed that the majority of licensees would decommission at the end of the facilitys operating licensed life. Since that time, several licensees permanently and prematurely ceased operations. Exemptions from certain operating requirements were required once the reactor was defueled to facilitate the decommissioning. Each case was handled individually, without clearly defined generic requirements.

The NRC amended the decommissioning regulations in 1996 to clarify

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 4 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process. The new amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.

Under the revised regulations, licensees will submit written certification to the NRC within 30 days after the decision to cease operations. Certification will also be required once the fuel is permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

Submittal of these notices will entitle the licensee to a fee reduction and eliminate the obligation to follow certain requirements needed only during operation of the reactor. Within two years of submitting notice of permanent cessation of operations, the licensee is required to submit a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the NRC. The PSDAR describes the planned decommissioning activities, the associated sequence and

schedule, and an estimate of expected costs.

Prior to completing decommissioning, the licensee is required to submit applications to the NRC to terminate the license, which will include a License Termination Plan (LTP).

1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) in 1982,[7]

assigning the federal governments long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998; however, to date no progress in the removal of spent fuel from commercial generating sites has been made.

Today, the country is at an impasse on high-level waste disposal, even with the License Application for a geologic repository submitted by the DOE to the NRC in 2008. The current Administration has cut the budget for the repository program while promising to conduct a comprehensive review of policies for managing the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle and make recommendations for a new plan.

Towards this goal, the Administration appointed a Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future (Blue Ribbon Commission) to make recommendations for a new plan for nuclear waste disposal. The Blue Ribbon Commissions charter includes a requirement that it consider [o]ptions for safe storage of used nuclear fuel while final disposition pathways are selected and deployed.[8]

On January 26, 2012, the Blue Ribbon Commission issued its Report to the Secretary of Energy containing a number of recommendations on

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 5 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

nuclear waste disposal. Two of the recommendations that may impact decommissioning planning are:

[T]he United States [should] establish a program that leads to the timely development of one or more consolidated storage facilities

[T]he United States should undertake an integrated nuclear waste management program that leads to the timely development of one or more permanent deep geological facilities for the safe disposal of spent fuel and high-level nuclear waste.[9]

In January 2013, the DOE issued the Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, in response to the recommendations made by the Blue Ribbon Commission and as a framework for moving toward a sustainable program to deploy an integrated system capable of transporting, storing, and disposing of used nuclear fuel...[10]

With the appropriate authorizations from Congress, the Administration currently plans to implement a program over the next 10 years that:

Sites, designs and licenses, constructs and begins operations of a pilot interim storage facility by 2021 with an initial focus on accepting used nuclear fuel from shut-down reactor sites; Advances toward the siting and licensing of a larger interim storage facility to be available by 2025 that will have sufficient capacity to provide flexibility in the waste management system and allows for acceptance of enough used nuclear fuel to reduce expected government liabilities; and Makes demonstrable progress on the siting and characterization of repository sites to facilitate the availability of a geologic repository by 2048.

The NRCs review of DOEs license application to construct a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain was suspended in 2011 when the Administration slashed the budget for completing that work. However, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently issued a writ of mandamus (in August 2013)[11] ordering NRC to comply with federal law and restart its review of DOE's Yucca Mountain

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 6 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

repository license application to the extent of previously appropriated funding for the review.

Completion of the decommissioning process is dependent upon the DOEs ability to remove spent fuel from the site in a timely manner.

DOEs repository program had assumed that spent fuel allocations would be accepted for disposal from the nations commercial nuclear plants, with limited exceptions, in the order (the queue) in which it was discharged from the reactor.[12] With a large fleet of reactors, Exelon may be able to re-assign allocations between its units to minimize on-site storage costs.

Assuming a 2025 start date for DOE initiating transfer of commercial spent fuel to a federal facility (based upon the proposed timeline for the availability of the larger interim storage facility), the assemblies generated from Oyster Creek operations are projected to be shipped from the Oyster Creek site in the years 2034 through 2036 (assuming the cessation of plant operations in 2019). This equates to 76 multi-purpose canisters (at 61 assemblies per canister).

An ISFSI, operated under a Part 50 General License (in accordance with 10 CFR 72, Subpart K[13]), has been constructed to support continued plant operations. This analysis assumes that the facility can be expanded to support decommissioning operations (in the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios).

The spent fuel in the wet storage pools at the cessation of plant operations is expected to be transferred to the ISFSI (DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios) within the first five and one-half years following shutdown. Once the wet storage pools are emptied, the reactor buildings can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. The spent fuel pools are kept operational in the Delayed DECON scenario until the transfer of spent fuel from the pools to the DOE can be completed.

Exelons strongly held position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Oyster Creeks fuel in a timely manner and consistent with its contract commitments. No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim. However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 7 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

decommissioning funds at the end of the stations life if the DOE has not met its contractual obligation to take the fuel.

1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for shallow-land disposal. With the passage of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act in 1980,[14] and its Amendments of 1985,[15] the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders.

New Jersey is a member of the three-state Atlantic Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact, formed after South Carolina formally joined the Northeast Regional Compact. The Barnwell Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Facility, located in South Carolina, is expected to be available to support the decommissioning of Oyster Creek. It is also assumed that Exelon can access other disposal sites, should it prove cost-effective. As such, rate schedules for both the Barnwell and the EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah are used to generate disposal costs.

For the purpose of this analysis, the EnergySolutions facility is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the lowest level and majority of the radioactive waste (Class A [16]). EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel.

The disposal cost for this material is based upon the rate schedule for the Barnwell facility.

The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)). The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material. The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste.

However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 8 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance. As such, the GTCC radioactive waste in this study is assumed to be packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.

The GTCC material is either stored with the spent fuel at the ISFSI or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning).

A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials. This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery. Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Oyster Creek reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.

1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination In 1997, the NRC published Subpart E, Radiological Criteria for License Termination,[17] amending 10 CFR §20. This subpart provides radiological criteria for releasing a facility for unrestricted use. The regulation states that the site can be released for unrestricted use if radioactivity levels are such that the average member of a critical group would not receive a Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in excess of 25 millirem per year, and provided that residual radioactivity has been reduced to levels that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

The decommissioning estimates for Oyster Creek assume that the site will be remediated to a residual level consistent with the NRC-prescribed level as well as the State of New Jerseys remedial action levels for radioactive material.

It should be noted that the NRC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) differ on the amount of residual radioactivity considered acceptable in site remediation. The EPA has two limits that apply to radioactive materials. An EPA limit of 15 millirem per year is derived from criteria established by the Comprehensive Environmental

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 1, Page 9 of 9 TLG Services, Inc.

Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund).[18]

An additional limit of 4 millirem per year, as defined in 40 CFR §141.16, is applied to drinking water.[19]

On October 9, 2002, the NRC signed an agreement with the EPA on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)[20] provides that EPA will defer exercise of authority under CERCLA for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority. The MOU also includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOU.

The MOU does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and should reduce the involvement of the EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning. Most sites are expected to meet the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and the NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOU that trigger consultation with the EPA. However, if there are other hazardous materials on the site, the EPA may be involved in the cleanup. As such, the possibility of dual regulation remains for certain licensees. The present study does not include any costs for this occurrence.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 1 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost estimates were developed to decommission Oyster Creek for three variations of the approved decommissioning alternatives: DECON and SAFSTOR.

Although the scenarios differ with respect to technique, process, cost, and schedule, they attain the same result: the ultimate release of the site for unrestricted use.

Three decommissioning scenarios were evaluated for the nuclear station. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows:

1.

DECON: Decommissioning activities commence shortly after the cessation of plant operations. The spent fuel in the plants spent fuel storage pool is transferred to the ISFSI within five and one-half years. The equipment, structures, and portions of the plant containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the facility to be released for unrestricted use. Non-essential structures are then demolished. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site (ISFSI) until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2036.

2.

Delayed DECON: In the second scenario the unit is shutdown and prepared for dismantling similar to the DECON scenario; however, in this scenario, the unit enters an abbreviated period of storage prior to the actual start of field activities. The spent fuel discharged to the storage pool once operations cease remains in the pool until it can be transferred to a DOE facility. The ISFSI, used to support operations, is not used to off-load the storage pool.

Decommissioning is delayed until the transfer of the fuel from both the pool and ISFSI to the DOE is completed in the year 2036. The unit is then decommissioned.

3.

SAFSTOR: The unit is placed into safe-storage in the third scenario.

Decommissioning is deferred beyond the fuel storage period to the maximum extent possible; termination of the license would conclude within the required 60-year period. The spent fuel in the plants spent fuel storage pool is transferred to the ISFSI within five and one-half years. Spent fuel storage operations continue at the site until the transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete, assumed to be in the year 2036. The plant remains in safe-storage following the removal of spent fuel from the site, timed to allow final decommissioning and license termination to be completed within 60 years of final shutdown. As with the first two scenarios, decommissioning activities are

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 2 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

integrated so as to minimize the total duration of the physical dismantling process.

The following sections describe the basic activities associated with each alternative.

Although detailed procedures for each activity identified are not provided, and the actual sequence of work may vary, the activity descriptions provide a basis not only for estimating but also for the expected scope of work (i.e., engineering and planning at the time of decommissioning).

The conceptual approach that the NRC has described in its regulations divides decommissioning into three phases. The initial phase commences with the effective date of permanent cessation of operations and involves the transition of both plant and licensee from reactor operations (i.e., power production) to facilitate de-activation and closure. During the first phase, notification is to be provided to the NRC certifying the permanent cessation of operations and the removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. The licensee would then be prohibited from reactor operation.

The second phase encompasses activities during the storage period or during major decommissioning activities, or a combination of the two. The third phase pertains to the activities involved in license termination. The decommissioning estimates developed for Oyster Creek are also divided into phases or periods; however, demarcation of the phases is based upon major milestones within the project or significant changes in the projected expenditures.

2.1 DECON The DECON alternative, as defined by the NRC, is "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." This study does not address the cost to dispose of the spent fuel residing at the site; such costs are funded through a surcharge on electrical generation. However, the study does estimate the costs incurred with the interim on-site storage of the fuel pending shipment by the DOE to an off-site disposal facility.

2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations In anticipation of the cessation of plant operations, detailed preparations are undertaken to provide a smooth transition from plant operations to site decommissioning. Through implementation of a staffing transition plan, the organization required to manage the

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 3 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

intended decommissioning activities is assembled from available plant staff and outside resources. Preparations include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications applicable to the operating conditions and requirements, a

characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.

Engineering and Planning The PSDAR, required before or within two years after permanent cessation of operations, provides a description of the licensees planned decommissioning activities, a timetable, and the associated financial requirements of the intended decommissioning program. Upon receipt of the PSDAR, the NRC will make the document available to the public for comment in a local meeting to be held in the vicinity of the reactor site.

Ninety days following submittal and NRC receipt of the PSDAR, the licensee may begin to perform major decommissioning activities under a modified 10 CFR §50.59 procedure, i.e., without specific NRC approval.

Major activities are defined as any activity that results in permanent removal of major radioactive components, permanently modifies the structure of the containment, or results in dismantling components (for shipment) containing GTCC, as defined by 10 CFR §61. Major components are further defined as comprising the reactor vessel and internals, large bore reactor recirculation system piping, and other large components that are radioactive. The NRC includes the following additional criteria for use of the §50.59 process in decommissioning. The proposed activity must not:

foreclose release of the site for possible unrestricted use, significantly increase decommissioning costs, cause any significant environmental impact, or violate the terms of the licensees existing license.

Existing operational technical specifications are reviewed and modified to reflect plant conditions and the safety concerns associated with permanent cessation of operations.

The environmental impact associated with the planned decommissioning activities is also considered. Typically, a licensee will not be allowed to proceed if the consequences of a particular decommissioning activity are greater than that bounded by previously evaluated environmental assessments or impact statements. In this instance, the licensee would have to submit

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 4 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

a license amendment for the specific activity and update the environmental report.

The decommissioning program outlined in the PSDAR will be designed to accomplish the required tasks within the ALARA guidelines (as defined in 10 CFR §20) for protection of personnel from exposure to radiation hazards. It will also address the continued protection of the health and safety of the public and the environment during the dismantling activity. Consequently, with the development of the PSDAR, activity specifications, cost-benefit and safety analyses, and work packages and procedures, would be assembled to support the proposed decontamination and dismantling activities.

Site Preparations Following final plant shutdown, and in preparation for actual decommissioning activities, the following activities are initiated:

Characterization of the site and surrounding environs. This includes radiation surveys of work areas, major components (including the reactor vessel and its internals), internal piping, and primary shield cores.

Isolation of the spent fuel storage pool and fuel handling systems, such that decommissioning operations can commence on the balance of the plant. Decommissioning operations are scheduled around the fuel handling area to optimize the overall project schedule. The fuel is transferred to the ISFSI as it decays to the point that it meets the definition of standard fuel (DECON and SAFSTOR alternatives), or the DOE (Delayed DECON). Consequently, it is assumed that the fuel pool remains operational for approximately five and one-half years following the cessation of operations.

Specification of transport and disposal requirements for activated materials and/or hazardous materials, including shielding and waste stabilization.

Development of procedures for occupational exposure control, control and release of liquid and gaseous effluent, processing of radwaste (including dry-active waste, resins, filter media, metallic and non-metallic components generated in decommissioning), site security and emergency programs, and industrial safety.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 5 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

2.1.2 Period 2 - Decommissioning Operations This period includes the physical decommissioning activities associated with the removal and disposal of contaminated and activated components and structures, including the successful amendment of the 10 CFR §50 operating license (releasing the site, exclusive of the ISFSI).

Significant decommissioning activities in this phase include:

Construction of temporary facilities and/or modification of existing facilities to support dismantling activities. This may include a centralized processing area to facilitate equipment removal and component preparations for off-site disposal.

Reconfiguration and modification of site structures and facilities as needed to support decommissioning operations. This may include the upgrading of roads (on and off site) to facilitate hauling and transport. Modifications may be required to the containment structure to facilitate access of large/heavy equipment. Modifications may also be required to the refueling area of the reactor building to support the segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and component extraction.

Design and fabrication of temporary and permanent shielding to support removal and transportation activities, construction of contamination control envelopes, and the procurement of specialty tooling.

Procurement (lease or purchase) of shipping canisters, cask liners, and industrial packages.

Decontamination of components and piping systems as required to control (minimize) worker exposure.

Removal of piping and components no longer essential to support decommissioning operations.

Transfer of the steam separator and dryer assemblies to the dryer-separator pool for segmentation. Segmentation by weight and activity maximizes the loading of the shielded transport casks. The operations are conducted under water using remotely-operated tooling and contamination controls.

Disconnection of the control blades from the drives on the vessel lower head. Blades are transferred to the spent fuel pool for packaging.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 6 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

Disassembly, segmentation, and packaging of the core shroud and in-core guide tubes. Some of the material is expected to exceed Class C disposal requirements. As such, those segments are packaged in modified fuel storage canisters for geologic disposal.

Removal and segmentation of the remaining internals, fuel support castings, and core plate assembly.

Draining and decontamination of the reactor well and the permanent sealing of the spent fuel transfer gate. Installation of a shielded platform for segmentation of the reactor vessel. Cutting operations are performed in air using remotely operated equipment within a contamination control envelope, with the water level maintained just below the cut to minimize the working area dose rates. Sections are transferred to the dryer-separator pool for packaging and interim storage.

Disconnection of the control rod drives and instrumentation tubes from reactor vessel lower head. The lower reactor head and vessel support skirt are then segmented.

Removal of the reactor recirculation pumps. Exterior surfaces are decontaminated and openings covered. Components can serve as their own burial containers provided that all penetrations are properly sealed.

Demolition of the sacrificial shield activated concrete by controlled demolition.

At least two years prior to the anticipated date of license termination, an LTP is required. Submitted as a supplement to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or its equivalent, the plan must include: a site characterization, description of the remaining dismantling activities, plans for site remediation, procedures for the final radiation survey, designation of the end use of the site, an updated cost estimate to complete the decommissioning, and any associated environmental concerns. The NRC will notice the receipt of the plan, make the plan available for public comment, and schedule a local meeting. LTP approval will be subject to any conditions and limitations as deemed appropriate by the Commission. The licensee may then commence with the final remediation of site facilities and services, including:

Removal of remaining plant systems and associated components as they become nonessential to the decommissioning program or worker

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 7 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

health and safety (e.g., waste collection and treatment systems, electrical power and ventilation systems).

Removal of the steel liners from the drywell, disposing of the activated and contaminated sections as radioactive waste. Removal of any activated/contaminated concrete.

Removal of the steel liners from the steam separator and dryer pool, reactor well and spent fuel storage pool.

Surveys of the decontaminated areas of the containment structures.

Removal of the contaminated equipment and material from the turbine and radwaste buildings, and any other contaminated facility.

Use radiation and contamination control techniques until radiation surveys indicate that the structures can be released for unrestricted access and conventional demolition. This activity may necessitate the dismantling and disposition of most of the systems and components (both clean and contaminated) located within these buildings. This activity will facilitate surface decontamination and subsequent verification surveys required prior to obtaining release for demolition.

Removal of the remaining components, equipment, and plant services in support of the area release survey(s).

Routing of material removed in the decontamination and dismantling to a central processing area. Material certified to be free of contamination is released for unrestricted disposition, e.g., as scrap, recycle, or general disposal. Contaminated material is characterized and segregated for additional off-site processing (disassembly, chemical cleaning, volume reduction, and waste treatment), and/or packaged for controlled disposal at a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.

Incorporated into the LTP is the Final Survey Plan. This plan identifies the radiological surveys to be performed once the decontamination activities are completed and is developed using the guidance provided in the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM).[21] This document incorporates the statistical approaches to survey design and data interpretation used by the EPA. It also identifies commercially available instrumentation and procedures for conducting radiological surveys. Use of this guidance ensures that the surveys are conducted in a manner that provides a high degree of confidence that applicable NRC criteria are satisfied. Once the survey is

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 8 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

complete, the results are provided to the NRC in a format that can be verified. The NRC then reviews and evaluates the information, performs an independent confirmation of radiological site conditions, and makes a determination on the requested change to the operating license (that would release the property, exclusive of the ISFSI, for unrestricted use).

The NRC will amend the operating license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the LTP, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release.

2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site restoration activities will begin. Efficient removal of the contaminated materials and verification that residual radionuclide concentrations are below the NRC limits will result in substantial damage to many of the structures.

Although performed in a controlled and safe manner, blasting, coring, drilling, scarification (surface removal), and the other decontamination activities will substantially degrade power block structures including the

reactor, turbine and radwaste buildings.

Under certain circumstances, verifying that subsurface radionuclide concentrations meet NRC site release requirements will require removal of grade slabs and lower floors, potentially weakening footings and structural supports.

This removal activity will be necessary for those facilities and plant areas where historical records, when available, indicate the potential for radionuclides having been present in the soil, where system failures have been recorded, or where it is required to confirm that subsurface process and drain lines were not breached over the operating life of the station.

Prompt dismantling of site structures is likely the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process were deferred. Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public as well as to future workers. Abandonment creates a breeding ground for vermin infestation as well as other biological hazards.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 9 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

This cost study presumes that non-essential structures and site facilities are dismantled as a continuation of the decommissioning activity.

Foundations and exterior walls are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. The three-foot depth allows for the placement of gravel for drainage, as well as topsoil, so that vegetation can be established for erosion control. Site areas affected by the dismantling activities are restored and the plant area graded as required to prevent ponding and inhibit the refloating of subsurface materials.

Concrete rubble produced by demolition activities is processed to remove rebar and miscellaneous embedments. The processed material is then used on site to backfill voids. Excess materials are trucked to an off-site area for disposal as construction debris.

2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning The ISFSI will continue to operate under a general license (10 CFR §50) following the amendment of the operating license to release the adjacent (power block) property. Assuming the DOE starts accepting fuel from Oyster Creek in 2034, transfer of spent fuel from the ISFSI is anticipated to continue through the year 2036.

At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process, the ISFSI will be decommissioned. The existing design for the ISFSI is based upon the use of a multi-purpose canister and a concrete horizontal module for pad storage. For purposes of this cost analysis, it is assumed that the concrete and steel in several of the modules will have low levels of neutron activation. These modules will be designated for controlled disposal. The remaining modules will be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete. The concrete storage pad will then be removed, and the area graded and landscaped to conform to the surrounding environment.

The NRC will terminate the §50 license when it determines that the remediation of the ISFSI has been performed in accordance with an ISFSI license termination plan and that the final radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. Once the requirements are satisfied, the NRC can terminate the license for the ISFSI.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 10 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

2.2 SAFSTOR AND DELAYED DECOMMISSIONING The NRC defines SAFSTOR as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use." The facility is left intact (during the dormancy period), with structures maintained in a sound condition. Systems not required to operate in support of the spent fuel pool or site surveillance and security are drained, de-energized, and secured. Minimal cleaning/removal of loose contamination and/or fixation and sealing of remaining contamination are performed. Access to contaminated areas is secured to provide controlled access for inspection and maintenance.

The engineering and planning requirements are similar to those for the DECON alternative, although a shorter time period is expected for these activities due to the more limited work scope. Site preparations are also similar to those for the DECON alternative. However, with the exception of the required radiation surveys and site characterizations, the mobilization and preparation of site facilities is less extensive.

The following discussion is appropriate for both the SAFSTOR and Delayed DECON scenarios, the primary differences being in the storage methods for the spent fuel and the length of the dormancy period. Spent fuel is continued to be stored in the wet storage pool for the Delayed DECON scenario until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility can be completed, i.e., the ISFSI is not used to offload the pool. Decommissioning operations are assumed to begin once the transfer is complete. By contrast, all of the fuel remaining in the storage pool after the minimum required cooling period is relocated to the ISFSI in the SAFSTOR scenario and the pool emptied. The nuclear unit remains in storage after fuel transfer operations are completed, with decommissioning operations initiated such that the license is terminated within the required 60-year time period. In both scenarios, the spent fuel is transferred from the ISFSI to the DOE between the years 2034 and 2036.

2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations Preparations for long-term storage include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications appropriate to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 11 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

The process of placing the plant in safe-storage includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:

Isolation of the spent fuel storage services and fuel handling systems located in the reactor building so that safe-storage operations may commence on the balance of the plant. This activity may be carried out by plant personnel in accordance with existing operating technical specifications. Activities are scheduled around the fuel handling systems to the greatest extent possible.

Draining and de-energizing of the non-contaminated systems not required to support continued site operations or maintenance.

Disposing of contaminated filter elements and resin beds not required for processing wastes from layup activities for future operations.

Draining of the reactor vessel, with the internals left in place and the vessel head secured.

Draining and de-energizing non-essential, contaminated systems with decontamination as required for future maintenance and inspection.

Preparing lighting and alarm systems whose continued use is required; de-energizing portions of fire protection, electric power, and HVAC systems whose continued use is not required.

Cleaning of the loose surface contamination from building access pathways.

Performing an interim radiation survey of plant, posting warning signs where appropriate.

Erecting physical barriers and/or securing all access to radioactive or contaminated areas, except as required for inspection and maintenance.

Installing security and surveillance monitoring equipment and relocating security fence around secured structures, as required.

2.2.2 Period 2 - Dormancy The second phase identified by the NRC in its rule addresses licensed activities during a storage period and is applicable to the dormancy phases of the deferred decommissioning alternatives. Dormancy activities include a 24-hour security force, preventive and corrective

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 12 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

maintenance on security systems, area lighting, general building maintenance, heating and ventilation of buildings, routine radiological inspections of contaminated structures, maintenance of structural integrity, and a site environmental and radiation monitoring program.

Resident maintenance personnel perform equipment maintenance, inspection activities, routine services to maintain safe conditions, adequate lighting, heating, and ventilation, and periodic preventive maintenance on essential site services.

An environmental surveillance program is carried out during the dormancy period to ensure that releases of radioactive material to the environment are prevented and/or detected and controlled. Appropriate emergency procedures are established and initiated for potential releases that exceed prescribed limits. The environmental surveillance program constitutes an abbreviated version of the program in effect during normal plant operations.

Security during the dormancy period is conducted primarily to prevent unauthorized entry and to protect the public from the consequences of their own actions. The security fence, sensors, alarms, and other surveillance equipment provide security. Fire and radiation alarms are also monitored and maintained. While remote surveillance is an option, it does not offer the immediate response time of a physical presence.

The transfer of the spent fuel to a DOE facility continues during this period until complete.

After an optional period of storage (such that license terminations are accomplished within 60 years of final shutdown), it is required that the licensee submit applications to terminate the license, along with an LTP (described in Section 2.1.2), thereby initiating the third phase.

2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning Prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations, preparations are undertaken to reactivate site services and prepare for decommissioning. Preparations include engineering and planning, a detailed site characterization, and the assembly of a decommissioning management organization. Final planning for activities and the writing of activity specifications and detailed procedures are also initiated at this time.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 13 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

Much of the work in developing a termination plan is relevant to the development of the detailed engineering plans and procedures. The activities associated with this phase and the follow-on decontamination and dismantling processes are detailed in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. The primary difference between the sequences anticipated for the DECON and deferred scenarios is the absence, in the latter, of any constraint on the availability of the fuel storage facilities located within the reactor building for decommissioning.

Variations in the length of the dormancy period are expected to have little effect upon the quantities of radioactive wastes generated from system and structure removal operations. Given the levels of radioactivity and spectrum of radionuclides expected from fifty years of plant operation, no plant process system identified as being contaminated upon final shutdown will become releasable due to the decay period alone, i.e., there is no significant reduction in the waste generated from the decommissioning activities. However, due to the lower activity levels, a greater percentage of the waste volume can be designated for off-site processing and recovery.

The delay in decommissioning also yields lower working area radiation levels. As such, the estimates for the delayed scenarios incorporate reduced ALARA controls for the lower occupational exposure potential.

Although the initial radiation levels due to 60Co will decrease during the dormancy period, the internal components of the reactor vessel will still exhibit sufficiently high radiation dose rates to require remote sectioning under water due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides such as 94Nb, 59Ni, and 63Ni. Therefore, the dismantling procedures described for the DECON alternative would still be employed during SAFSTOR scenario. Portions of the sacrificial shield will still be radioactive due to the presence of activated trace elements with long half-lives (152Eu and 154Eu). Decontamination will require controlled removal and disposal. It is assumed that radioactive corrosion products on inner surfaces of piping and components will not have decayed to levels that will permit unrestricted use or allow conventional removal.

These systems and components will be surveyed as they are removed and disposed of in accordance with the existing radioactive release criteria.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 2, Page 14 of 14 TLG Services, Inc.

2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site-restoration activities can begin. If the site structures are to be dismantled, dismantling as a continuation of the decommissioning process is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option, as described in Section 2.1.3. The basis for the dismantling cost in the SAFSTOR scenario is consistent with that described for DECON, presuming the removal of structures and site facilities to a nominal depth of three feet below grade and the limited restoration of the site.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 1 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

3. COST ESTIMATE The cost estimates prepared for decommissioning Oyster Creek consider the unique features of the site, including the NSSS, power generation systems, support services, site buildings, and ancillary facilities. The basis of the estimates, including the sources of information relied upon, the estimating methodology employed, site-specific considerations, and other pertinent assumptions, is described in this section.

3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATE The estimates were developed with site-specific, technical information developed in an evaluation prepared for Exelon in 2008-09. The information was reviewed for the current analysis and updated as deemed appropriate.

The site-specific considerations and assumptions used in the previous evaluation were also revisited. Modifications were incorporated where new information was available or experience from ongoing decommissioning programs provided viable alternatives or improved processes.

3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used to develop the estimates follows the basic approach originally presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study report, "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"[22]

and the DOE "Decommissioning Handbook."[23]

These documents present a unit factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs, which simplifies the estimating calculations. Unit factors for concrete removal ($/cubic yard), steel removal ($/ton), and cutting costs ($/inch) were developed using local labor rates. The activity-dependent costs were estimated with the item quantities (cubic yards and tons), developed from plant drawings and inventory documents. Removal rates and material costs for the conventional disposition of components and structures relied upon information available in the industry publication, "Building Construction Cost Data," published by R.S. Means.[24]

This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLGs involvement in the Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Oyster Creek, Connecticut Yankee, and San

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 2 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.

The unit factor method provides a demonstrable basis for establishing reliable cost estimates. The detail provided in the unit factors, including activity duration, labor costs (by craft), and equipment and consumable costs, ensures that essential elements have not been omitted. Appendix A presents the detailed development of a typical unit factor. Appendix B provides the values contained within one set of factors developed for this analysis.

Work Difficulty Factors WDFs were assigned to each area, commensurate with the inefficiencies associated with working in confined, hazardous environments. The ranges used for the WDFs are as follows:

Access Factor 0% to 50%

Respiratory Protection Factor 0% to 25%

Radiation/ALARA Factor 0% to 100%

Protective Clothing Factor 0% to 50%

Work Break Factor 8.33%

These factors and their associated range of values were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forums Guideline Study. The factors (and their suggested application) are discussed in more detail in Appendix F.

Scheduling Program Durations The unit factors, adjusted by the WDFs as described above, are applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in the radiologically controlled areas.

The resulting man-hours, or crew-hours, are used in the development of the decommissioning program schedule, using resource loading and event sequencing considerations. The scheduling of conventional removal and dismantling activities are based upon productivity information available from the "Building Construction Cost Data" publication.

An area-by-area activity duration critical path was used to develop the total decommissioning program schedule. The unit cost factors, adjusted for WDFs as described above, were applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in each defined work area. Each work area was assessed for the most efficient number of workers/crews for the decommissioning activities. These

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 3 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

adjusted unit cost factors were applied against the available manpower so that an overall duration for removal of components and piping from each work area could be calculated. Work area identification is consistent with the Survey Tracking Number (STN) system utilized by GPUs radiological services group in the 1997 timeframe. An index of the GPU STNs is provided in Appendix G.

The program schedule is used to determine the period-dependent costs for program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, contracted services, etc. The study relies upon regional or site-specific salary and wage rates for the personnel associated with the intended program.

3.3 FINANCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLGs proprietary decommissioning cost model, DECCER, produces a number of distinct cost elements. These direct expenditures, however, do not comprise the total cost to accomplish the project goal, i.e., license termination and site restoration.

Inherent in any cost estimate that does not rely on historical data is the inability to specify the precise source of costs imposed by factors such as tool breakage, accidents, illnesses, weather delays, and labor stoppages. In the DECCER cost model, contingency fulfills this role. Contingency is added to each line item to account for costs that are difficult or impossible to develop analytically. Such costs are historically inevitable over the duration of a job of this magnitude; therefore, this cost analysis includes funds to cover these types of expenses.

3.3.1 Contingency The activity-and period-dependent costs are combined to develop the total decommissioning cost. A contingency is then applied on a line-item basis, using one or more of the contingency types listed in the AIF/NESP-036 study. "Contingencies" are defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook[25]

as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope; particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." The cost elements in this analysis are based upon ideal conditions and maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent with industry practice, a contingency factor has been applied. In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the types of unforeseeable events that are likely to occur in decommissioning are discussed and

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 4 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

guidelines are provided for percentage contingency in each category. It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.

The use and role of contingency within decommissioning estimates is not a safety factor issue. Safety factors provide additional security and address situations that may never occur. Contingency funds are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. They also provide assurance that sufficient funding is available to accomplish the intended tasks. An estimate without contingency, or from which contingency has been removed, can disrupt the orderly progression of events and jeopardize a successful conclusion to the decommissioning process.

For

example, the most technologically challenging task in decommissioning a commercial nuclear station is the disposition of the reactor vessel and internal components, now highly radioactive after a lifetime of exposure to core activity. The disposition of these components forms the basis of the critical path (schedule) for decommissioning operations. Cost and schedule are interdependent, and any deviation in schedule has a significant impact on cost for performing a specific activity.

Disposition of the reactor vessel internals involves the underwater cutting of complex components that are highly radioactive. Costs are based upon optimum segmentation, handling, and packaging scenarios.

The schedule is primarily dependent upon the turnaround time for the heavily shielded shipping casks, including preparation, loading, and decontamination of the containers for transport. The number of casks required is a function of the pieces generated in the segmentation activity, a value calculated on optimum performance of the tooling employed in cutting the various subassemblies. The expected optimization, however, may not be achieved, resulting in delays and additional program costs. For this reason, contingency must be included to mitigate the consequences of the expected inefficiencies inherent in this complex activity, along with related concerns associated with the operation of highly specialized tooling, field conditions, and water clarity.

Contingency funds are an integral part of the total cost to complete the decommissioning process. Exclusion of this component puts at risk a

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 5 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

successful completion of the intended tasks and, potentially, subsequent related activities. For this study, TLG examined the major activity-related problems (decontamination, segmentation, equipment handling, packaging, transport, and waste disposal) that necessitate a

contingency. Individual activity contingencies ranged from 10% to 75%,

depending on the degree of difficulty judged to be appropriate from TLGs actual decommissioning experience. The contingency values used in this study are as follows:

Decontamination 50%

Contaminated Component Removal 25%

Contaminated Component Packaging 10%

Contaminated Component Transport 15%

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 25%

Reactor Segmentation 75%

NSSS Component Removal 25%

Reactor Waste Packaging 25%

Reactor Waste Transport 25%

Reactor Vessel Component Disposal 50%

GTCC Disposal 15%

Non-Radioactive Component Removal 15%

Heavy Equipment and Tooling 15%

Supplies 25%

Engineering 15%

Energy 15%

Characterization and Termination Surveys 30%

Construction 15%

Taxes and Fees 10%

Insurance 10%

Staffing 15%

Spent Fuel Storage (Dry) Modules 15%

Spent Fuel Transfer Costs 15%

Operations and Maintenance Expenses 15%

The contingency values are applied to the appropriate components of the estimates on a line-item basis. A composite value is then reported at the end of each estimate. For example, the composite contingency value

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 6 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

reported for the DECON alternative is 18.3%. Values for the other alternatives are delineated within their respective detailed cost tables in Appendices D and E.

3.3.2 Financial Risk In addition to the routine uncertainties addressed by contingency, another cost element that is sometimes necessary to consider when bounding decommissioning costs relates to uncertainty, or risk.

Examples can include changes in work scope, pricing, job performance, and other variations that could conceivably, but not necessarily, occur.

Consideration is sometimes necessary to generate a level of confidence in the estimate, within a range of probabilities. TLG considers these types of costs under the broad term financial risk. Included within the category of financial risk are:

Transition activities and costs: ancillary expenses associated with eliminating 50% to 80% of the site labor force shortly after the cessation of plant operations, added cost for worker separation packages throughout the decommissioning program, national or company-mandated retraining, and retention incentives for key personnel.

Delays in approval of the decommissioning plan due to intervention, public participation in local community meetings, legal challenges, and national and local hearings.

Changes in the project work scope from the baseline estimate, involving the discovery of unexpected levels of contaminants, contamination in places not previously expected, contaminated soil previously undiscovered (either radioactive or hazardous material contamination), variations in plant inventory or configuration not indicated by the as-built drawings.

Regulatory changes (e.g., affecting worker health and safety, site release criteria, waste transportation, and disposal).

Policy decisions altering national commitments (e.g., in the ability to accommodate certain waste forms for disposition or in the timetable for such, for example, in the start and rate of acceptance of spent fuel by the DOE).

Pricing changes for basic inputs, such as labor, energy, materials, and burial.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 7 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

This cost study, however, does not add any additional cost to the estimate for financial risk since there is insufficient historical data from which to project future liabilities. Consequently, the areas of uncertainty or risk are revisited periodically and addressed through repeated revisions or updates of the base estimate.

3.4 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are a number of site-specific considerations that affect the method for dismantling and removal of equipment from the site and the degree of restoration required. The cost impacts of the considerations identified below are included in this cost study.

3.4.1 Spent Fuel Management The cost to dispose of spent fuel generated from plant operations is not reflected within the estimates to decommission the Oyster Creek site.

Ultimate disposition of the spent fuel is within the province of the DOEs Waste Management System, as defined by the NWPA. As such, the disposal cost is financed by a 1 mill/kWhr surcharge paid into the DOEs waste fund during operations. However, the NRC requires licensees to establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactors until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy. This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements within the estimate, as described below.

The total inventory of assemblies that will require handling during decommissioning is based upon several assumptions. The pickup of commercial fuel is assumed to begin in the year 2025. The maximum rate at which the fuel is removed from the commercial sites is based upon an annual capacity at the geologic repository of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU). Any delay in the startup of the repository or decrease in the rate of acceptance will correspondingly prolong the transfer process and result in the fuel remaining at the site longer.

In all three scenarios, the existing ISFSI will continue to operate for the fifteen years following final shutdown. Assuming that the DOE commences repository operation in 2025, all fuel is projected to be removed from the Oyster Creek site by the year 2036.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 8 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

Operation and maintenance costs for the storage facilities are included within the estimates and address the cost for staffing the facilities, as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. Costs are also provided for the final disposition of the facilities once the transfer is complete.

Repository Startup Operation of the DOEs yet-to-be constructed geologic repository is contingent upon the review and approval of the facilitys license application by the NRC, the successful resolution of pending litigation, and the development of a national transportation system. With the appropriate authorizations from Congress, the Administration currently plans to implement a program over the next 10 years that could result in an interim storage facility being available by 2025.

Spent Fuel Management Model The Exelon nuclear fleet consists of 26 units at 14 sites in Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Maryland, including the inactive units at Dresden, Peach Bottom and Zion (Zion is still included in the spent fuel analysis model since the fuel transfer to DOE will be done as part of the Exelon allocation). The ability to complete the decommissioning of these units, particularly for the DECON and Delayed DECON alternatives, is highly dependent upon when the DOE is assumed to remove spent fuel from the sites.

The DOE's repository program assumes that spent fuel will be accepted for disposal from the nation's commercial nuclear plants in the order (the "queue") in which it was removed from service ("oldest fuel first"). A computer model developed by Exelon Nuclear was used to determine when the DOE would provide allocations in the queue for removal of spent fuel from the individual sites. Repository operations were based upon annual industry-wide receipt of 400 Metric Tons Heavy Metal (MTHM) in the first year of operation, a total of 3,800 MTHM in years 2 through 4 and 3,000 MTHM for year 5 and beyond.[26]

ISFSIs are constructed as necessary to maintain full-core discharge capability at the individual sites. Once the DOE begins repository operations, spent fuel shipments are managed across the fleet to optimize spent fuel storage.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 9 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

Canister Design The design and capacity of future cask acquisitions for the ISFSI is based upon the NUHOMS system, with a 61-fuel assembly capacity.

The DOE is assumed to provide the MPC for fuel transferred directly from the pool to the DOE at no cost to the owner.

Canister Loading and Transfer The cost for the labor to load/transport the spent fuel from the pool to the ISFSI pad is based upon Exelon experience. For estimating purposes, 50% of this cost is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the ISFSI to the DOE.

Operations and Maintenance Annual costs (excluding labor) of approximately $763,000 and $90,000 are used for operation and maintenance of the spent fuel pool and the ISFSI, respectively.

ISFSI Design Considerations A multi-purpose (storage and transport) dry shielded storage canister with a horizontal, reinforced concrete storage module is used as a basis for the cost analysis. The final core off load, equivalent to 10 modules, is assumed to have some level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of the fuel (i.e., to levels exceeding free-release limits). The ten modules are disposed of at a licensed facility. The cost of the disposition of this material, as well as the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the estimate.

3.4.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components The NSSS (reactor vessel and reactor recirculation system components) will be decontaminated using chemical agents prior to the start of cutting operations (for DECON alternative only). A decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is assumed for the process.

The reactor pressure vessel and internal components are segmented for disposal in shielded, reusable transportation casks. Segmentation is performed in the dryer-separator pool, where a turntable and remote cutter are installed. The vessel is segmented in place, using a mast-

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 10 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

mounted cutter supported off the lower head and directed from a shielded work platform installed overhead in the reactor cavity.

Transportation cask specifications and transportation regulations will dictate segmentation and packaging methodology.

The dismantling of the reactor internals will generate radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., GTCC). Although the material is not classified as high-level waste, the DOE has indicated it will accept this waste for disposal at the future high-level waste repository.[27] However, the DOE has not been forthcoming with an acceptance criteria or disposition schedule for this material, and numerous questions remain as to the ultimate disposal cost and waste form requirements. As such, for purposes of this study, the GTCC has been packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. It is not anticipated that the DOE would accept this waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel.

Therefore, until such time the DOE is ready to accept GTCC waste, it is reasonable to assume that this material would remain in storage at the Oyster Creek site.

Intact disposal of the reactor vessel and internal components can provide savings in cost and worker exposure by eliminating the complex segmentation requirements, isolation of the GTCC material, and transport/storage of the resulting waste packages. Portland General Electric (PGE) was able to dispose of the Trojan reactor as an intact package. However, its location on the Columbia River simplified the transportation analysis since:

the reactor package could be secured to the transport vehicle for the entire journey, i.e., the package was not lifted during transport, there were no man-made or natural terrain features between the plant site and the disposal location that could produce a large drop, and transport speeds were very low, limited by the overland transport vehicle and the river barge.

As a member of the Northwest Compact, PGE had a site available for disposal of the package - the US Ecology facility in Washington State.

The characteristics of this arid site proved favorable in demonstrating compliance with land disposal regulations.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 11 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

It is not known whether this option will be available when Oyster Creek ceases operation. Future viability of this option will depend upon the ultimate location of the disposal site, as well as the disposal site licensees ability to accept highly radioactive packages and effectively isolate them from the environment. Additionally, with BWRs, the diameter of the reactor vessel may severely limit overland transport.

Consequently, the study assumes the reactor vessel will require segmentation, as a bounding condition.

3.4.3 Primary System Components Reactor recirculation piping is cut from the reactor vessel once the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and cutting operations in and around the vessel) is dropped below the nozzle zone. The piping is boxed and transported by shielded van. The reactor recirculation pumps and motors are lifted out intact, packaged, and transported for processing and/or disposal.

3.4.4 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine will be dismantled using conventional maintenance procedures. The turbine rotors and shafts will be removed to a laydown area. The lower turbine casings will be removed from their anchors by controlled demolition. The main condensers will also be disassembled and moved to a laydown area. Material is then prepared for transportation to an off-site recycling facility where it will be surveyed and designated for either decontamination or volume reduction, conventional disposal, or controlled disposal. Components will be packaged and readied for transport in accordance with the intended disposition.

3.4.5 Transportation Methods Contaminated piping, components, and structural material other than the highly activated reactor vessel and internal components will qualify as LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated Object, SCO-I or II, as described in Title 49.[28] The contaminated material will be packaged in Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2, or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411) for transport unless demonstrated to qualify as their own shipping containers. The reactor vessel and internal components are expected to be transported as Type B, in accordance with §71. It is conceivable that the reactor, due to its limited specific activity, could qualify as LSA-II or

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 12 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

III. However, the high radiation levels on the outer surface would require that additional shielding be incorporated within the packaging so as to attenuate the dose to levels acceptable for transport.

Transport of the highly activated metal, produced in the segmentation of the reactor vessels and internal components, will be by shielded truck cask. Cask shipments may exceed 95,000 pounds, including vessel segment(s), supplementary shielding, cask tie-downs, and tractor-trailer. The maximum level of activity per shipment assumed permissible was based upon the license limits of the available shielded transport casks. The segmentation scheme for the vessel and internal segments is designed to meet these limits.

The transport of large intact components (e.g., large heat exchangers and other oversized components) will be by a combination of truck, rail, and/or multi-wheeled transporter. Truck transport costs were estimated using published tariffs from Tri-State Motor Transit.[29]

3.4.6 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal To the greatest extent practical, metallic material generated in the decontamination and dismantling processes is treated to reduce the total volume requiring controlled disposal. The treated material, meeting the regulatory and/or site release criterion, is released as scrap, requiring no further cost consideration. Conditioning and recovery of the waste stream is performed off site at a licensed processing center.

The mass of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities is reported by line item in Appendices C, D and E, and summarized in Section 5. The Section 5 waste summaries are consistent with 10 CFR §61 classifications. Commercially available steel containers are used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete. Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations. The waste volumes are calculated on the exterior package dimensions for containerized material or a dimensional calculation for components serving as their own waste containers.

The more highly activated reactor components are transported in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, with surcharges added for the special handling requirements and the

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 13 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

radiological characteristics of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.

Disposal fees are calculated using current disposal agreements, with surcharges added for the highly activated components, for example, generated in the segmentation of the reactor vessel. The majority of the material generated from the decontamination and dismantling activities (approximately 94% for the DECON alternative) is Class A waste. The disposal cost for this material is based upon Exelons current agreement with EnergySolutions for its disposal facility in Clive, Utah. Another 5%

of the total volume (also Class A) is assumed to be sent to the Barnwell facility.

Since the EnergySolutions facility is not able to accept the higher activity waste (Class B and C) generated in the decontamination of the reactor vessel and segmentation of the components closest to the core, the cost of disposal of this material (approximately 1% of the total volume) was based upon Exelons rates for the Barnwell facility.

Material exceeding Class C limits (limited to material closest to the reactor core and comprising less than 0.4% of the total waste volume) is generally not suitable for shallow-land disposal. This material is packaged in the same multipurpose canisters used for spent fuel storage/transport.

3.4.7 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning The NRC will terminate (or amend) the site license when it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the license termination plan, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. The NRCs involvement in the decommissioning process will end at this point. Building codes and environmental regulations will dictate the next step in the decommissioning process, as well as the owners own future plans for the site.

Non-essential structures or buildings severely damaged in decontamination process are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. Concrete rubble generated from demolition activities is processed and made available as clean fill. The excavations will be

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 14 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

regraded such that the power block area will have a final contour consistent with adjacent surroundings.

The estimates include the remediation of contaminated soil. This assumption may be affected by continued plant operations and/or future regulatory actions, such as the development of site-specific release criteria.

3.5 ASSUMPTIONS The following are the major assumptions made in the development of the estimates for decommissioning the site.

3.5.1 Estimating Basis The study follows the principles of ALARA through the use of work duration adjustment factors. These factors address the impact of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up training, and the use of respiratory protection and protective clothing. The factors lengthen a task's duration, increasing costs and lengthening the overall schedule. ALARA planning is considered in the costs for engineering and planning, and in the development of activity specifications and detailed procedures. Changes to worker exposure limits may impact the decommissioning cost and project schedule.

3.5.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to decontaminate and dismantle the nuclear unit will be acquired through standard site contracting practices. The current cost of labor at the site is used as an estimating basis. Costs for site administration, operations, construction, and maintenance personnel are based upon average salary information provided by Exelon or from comparable industry information.

Exelon will hire a Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) to manage the decommissioning. The owner will provide site security, radiological health and safety, quality assurance and overall site administration during the decommissioning and demolition phases.

Contract personnel will provide engineering services (e.g., for preparing the activity specifications, work procedures, activation, and structural analyses) under the direction of Exelon.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 15 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

3.5.3 Design Conditions Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 137Cs, 90Sr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major NSSS components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.

The curie contents of the vessel and internals at final shutdown are derived from those listed in NUREG/CR-3474.[30] Actual estimates are derived from the curie/gram values contained therein and adjusted for the different mass of the Oyster Creek components, projected operating life, and different periods of decay. Additional short-lived isotopes were derived from NUREG/CR-0130[31]

and NUREG/CR-0672,[32]

and benchmarked to the long-lived values from NUREG/CR-3474.

The disposal cost for the control blades removed from the vessel with the final core load is included within the estimates. Control blade residence time in the reactor is assumed to be controlled such that the blades do not become GTCC material. Disposition of any blades stored in the pool from operations is considered an operating expense and therefore not accounted for in the estimates.

Activation of the reactor building structure is confined to the sacrificial shield. More extensive activation (at very low levels) of the interior structures within containment has been detected at several reactors and their owners have elected to dispose of the affected material at a controlled facility rather than reuse the material as fill on site or send it to a landfill. The ultimate disposition of the material removed from the reactor building will depend upon the site release criteria selected, as well as the designated end use for the site.

3.5.4 General Transition Activities Existing warehouses will be cleared of non-essential material and remain for use by Exelon and its subcontractors. The plants operating staff will perform the following activities at no additional cost or credit to the project during the transition period:

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 16 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

Drain and collect fuel oils, lubricating oils, and transformer oils for recycle and/or sale.

Drain and collect acids, caustics, and other chemical stores for recycle and/or sale.

Processes operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates do not address the disposition of any legacy wastes; the disposal of operating wastes during this initial period is not considered a decommissioning expense.

Scrap and Salvage The existing plant equipment is considered obsolete and suitable for scrap as deadweight quantities only. Exelon will make economically reasonable efforts to salvage equipment following final plant shutdown.

However, dismantling techniques assumed by TLG for equipment in this analysis are not consistent with removal techniques required for salvage (resale) of equipment. Experience has indicated that some buyers wanted equipment stripped down to very specific requirements before they would consider purchase. This required expensive rework after the equipment had been removed from its installed location. Since placing a salvage value on this machinery and equipment would be speculative, and the value would be small in comparison to the overall decommissioning expenses, this analysis does not attempt to quantify the possible salvage value that an owner may realize based upon those efforts.

It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that any value received from the sale of scrap generated in the dismantling process would be more than offset by the on-site processing costs. The dismantling techniques assumed in the decommissioning estimates do not include the additional cost for size reduction and preparation to meet furnace ready conditions. For example, the recovery of copper from electrical cabling may require the removal and disposition of any contaminated insulation, an added expense. With a volatile market, the potential profit margin in scrap recovery is highly speculative, regardless of the ability to free release this material. This assumption is an implicit recognition of scrap value in the disposal of clean metallic waste at no additional cost to the project.

Furniture, tools, mobile equipment such as forklifts, trucks, bulldozers, and other property will be removed at no cost or credit to the

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 17 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

decommissioning project. Disposition may include relocation to other facilities. Spare parts will also be made available for alternative use.

Energy For estimating purposes, the plant is assumed to be de-energized, with the exception of those facilities associated with spent fuel storage.

Replacement power costs are used for the cost of energy consumption during decommissioning for tooling, lighting, ventilation, and essential services.

Insurance Costs for continuing coverage (nuclear liability and property insurance) following cessation of plant operations and during decommissioning are included and based upon current operating premiums. Reductions in premiums throughout the decommissioning process are based upon guidance provided by Exelon.

Taxes Property taxes are included for all decommissioning periods. Exelon provided a schedule estimate of decreasing tax payments against the current tax assessment. These reductions continue until reaching a minimum property tax payment of $1,000,000 per year; this level is maintained for the balance of the decommissioning program.

Site Modifications The perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will be moved, as appropriate, to conform to the Site Security Plan in force during the various stages of the project.

3.6 COST ESTIMATE

SUMMARY

A schedule of expenditures for each scenario is provided in Tables 3.1 through 3.3. Decommissioning costs are reported in the year of projected expenditure; however, the values are provided in thousands of 2011 dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure. The annual expenditures are based upon the detailed activity costs reported in Appendices C through E, along with the schedules discussed in Section 4.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 18 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 3.1 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES DECON (thousands, 2011 dollars)

Equipment &

Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2019 183 31 6

0 33 253 2020 67,261 11,335 2,224 171 12,325 93,317 2021 91,003 33,530 3,257 23,107 23,596 174,493 2022 72,012 28,519 1,990 19,168 10,341 132,031 2023 65,797 16,924 1,654 7,004 6,212 97,590 2024 65,977 16,970 1,659 7,023 6,229 97,858 2025 56,731 12,363 1,265 7,231 5,923 83,514 2026 43,173 4,761 654 3,612 4,295 56,495 2027 30,669 8,697 273 8

2,576 42,222 2028 23,269 8,525 174 0

2,380 34,348 2029 4,961 0

0 0

2,160 7,121 2030 4,961 0

0 0

2,160 7,121 2031 4,961 0

0 0

2,160 7,121 2032 4,974 0

0 0

2,166 7,140 2033 4,961 0

0 0

2,160 7,121 2034 5,104 431 0

0 2,160 7,696 2035 6,254 3,881 0

0 2,160 12,296 2036 6,268 4,431 0

0 7,270 17,970 2037 5,205 1,423 0

1,745 3,699 12,072 2038 823 318 0

239 553 1,933 Total 564,548 152,139 13,156 69,307 100,560 899,710

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 19 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 3.2 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES DELAYED DECON (thousands, 2011 dollars)

Equipment &

Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2019 145 3

6 0

14 169 2020 53,387 1,323 2,212 61 5,558 62,541 2021 39,896 5,087 1,311 1,431 17,624 65,349 2022 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2023 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2024 14,386 422 442 16 3,454 18,721 2025 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2026 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2027 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2028 14,386 422 442 16 3,454 18,721 2029 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2030 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2031 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2032 14,386 422 442 16 3,454 18,721 2033 14,347 421 441 16 3,444 18,670 2034 14,635 1,284 441 16 3,444 19,820 2035 16,935 8,184 441 16 3,444 29,020 2036 10,376 5,185 282 10 2,853 18,706 2037 43,703 1,677 2,206 62 2,405 50,053 2038 72,058 20,567 2,151 12,377 9,501 116,654 2039 64,149 18,163 1,928 15,255 10,942 110,437 2040 69,899 11,292 1,659 14,964 8,065 105,878 2041 37,097 4,114 528 1,497 2,750 45,986 2042 24,040 10,850 221 0

1,466 36,576 2043 9,748 4,399 89 0

594 14,831 Total 628,351 97,188 18,772 45,886 110,021 900,219

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 20 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 3.3 SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES SAFSTOR (thousands, 2011 dollars)

Equipment &

Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2019 154 29 6

0 31 220 2020 56,552 10,816 2,212 61 11,522 81,162 2021 43,052 14,555 1,311 1,431 17,909 78,258 2022 17,503 9,889 441 16 4,006 31,856 2023 17,503 9,889 441 16 4,006 31,856 2024 17,551 9,916 442 16 4,017 31,943 2025 12,065 5,054 330 12 3,244 20,704 2026 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2027 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2028 6,734 298 221 8

2,500 9,762 2029 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2030 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2031 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2032 6,734 298 221 8

2,500 9,762 2033 6,716 297 221 8

2,494 9,735 2034 6,859 729 221 8

2,494 10,310 2035 8,009 4,179 221 8

2,494 14,910 2036 8,020 4,180 221 8

2,500 14,928 2037 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2038 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2039 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2040 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2041 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2042 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2043 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2044 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2045 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2046 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2047 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2048 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2049 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2050 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2051 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 3, Page 21 of 21 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 3.3 (continued)

SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL EXPENDITURES SAFSTOR (thousands, 2011 dollars)

Equipment &

Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2052 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2053 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2054 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2055 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2056 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2057 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2058 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2059 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2060 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2061 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2062 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2063 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2064 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2065 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2066 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2067 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2068 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2069 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2070 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2071 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2072 3,819 291 221 7

2,321 6,660 2073 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2074 3,809 291 221 7

2,314 6,641 2075 30,732 1,197 1,564 27 2,369 35,889 2076 66,971 14,501 2,192 7,539 6,228 97,430 2077 64,064 22,408 1,990 15,841 11,863 116,165 2078 70,697 11,640 1,654 14,860 8,226 107,078 2079 43,969 4,266 736 3,649 3,750 56,370 2080 24,106 10,909 221 0

1,470 36,706 2081 13,173 5,961 121 0

803 20,058 Total 699,563 153,545 24,479 43,832 194,895 1,116,314

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 1 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE The schedules for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this study follow the sequence presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study, with minor changes to reflect recent experience and site-specific constraints. In addition, the scheduling has been revised to reflect the spent fuel management plans described in Section 3.4.1.

A schedule or sequence of activities is presented in Figure 4.1 for the DECON decommissioning alternative. The schedule is also representative of the work activities identified in the delayed dismantling scenarios, absent any spent fuel constraints. The scheduling sequence assumes that fuel is removed from the spent fuel pool within the first five and one-half years after operations cease. The key activities listed in the schedule do not reflect a one-to-one correspondence with those activities in the cost tables, but reflect dividing some activities for clarity and combining others for convenience. The schedule was prepared using the "Microsoft Project 2010" computer software.[33]

4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedule reflects the results of a precedence network developed for the site decommissioning activities, i.e., a PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) Software Package. The work activity durations used in the precedence network reflect the actual man-hour estimates from the cost tables, adjusted by stretching certain activities over their slack range and shifting the start and end dates of others. The following assumptions were made in the development of the DECON decommissioning schedule:

The reactor building is isolated until such time that all spent fuel has been discharged from the storage pool to the DOE. Decontamination and dismantling of the storage pool is initiated once the transfer of spent fuel to the DOE is complete.

All work (except vessel and internals removal) is performed during an 8-hour workday, 5 days per week, with no overtime. There are eleven paid holidays per year.

Reactor and internals removal activities are performed by using separate crews for different activities working on different shifts, with a corresponding backshift charge for the second shift.

Multiple crews work parallel activities to the maximum extent possible, consistent with optimum efficiency, adequate access for cutting, removal

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 2 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

and laydown space, and with the stringent safety measures necessary during demolition of heavy components and structures.

For plant systems removal, the systems with the longest removal durations in areas on the critical path are considered to determine the duration of the activity.

4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The period-dependent costs presented in the detailed cost tables are based upon the durations developed in the schedule for decommissioning Oyster Creek. Durations are established between several milestones in each project period; these durations are used to establish a critical path for the entire project. In turn, the critical path duration for each period is used as the basis for determining the period-dependent costs. A second critical path is also shown for the spent fuel cooling period, which determines the release of the reactor building for final decontamination.

Project timelines are provided in Figures 4.2 through 4.4; the milestone dates are based on this same shutdown date. The start of decommissioning activities in the Delayed Decommissioning scenario is concurrent with the end of the fuel transfer activity (i.e., to an off-site DOE facility).

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 3 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

FIGURE 4.1 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 4 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

FIGURE 4.1 DECON ACTIVITY SCHEDULE (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 5 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

FIGURE 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DECON (not to scale)

DECON (Shutdown December 31, 2019)

ISFSI Operations Pool and ISFSI Operations Period 1 Transition and Preparations 12/2019 07/2021 10/2028 03/2038 Period 2 Decommissioning Period 3 Site Restoration ISFSI Operations 12/2036 ISFSI D&D 03/2027 Spent Fuel Pool Empty 06/2025 ISFSI Empty

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 6 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

FIGURE 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DELAYED DECON (not to scale)

Delayed DECON (Shutdown December 31, 2019)

Spent Fuel Storage Period 1 Transition and Preparations 12/2019 06/2021 11/2041 05/2043 07/2038 Period 2 Dormancy 12/2036 Period 3 Delayed Preparations Period 4 Decommissioning Period 5 Site Restoration Spent Fuel Pool and ISFSI Empty

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 4, Page 7 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

FIGURE 4.4 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE SAFSTOR (not to scale)

SAFSTOR (Shutdown December 31, 2019)

Spent Fuel Storage Spent Fuel Pool and ISFSI Empty 12/2036 Period 1 Transition and Preparations 12/2019 06/2021 12/2079 07/2081 10/2076 Period 2 Dormancy 04/2075 Period 3 Delayed Preparations Period 4 Decommissioning Period 5 Site Restoration

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002 Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 1 of 5 TLG Services, Inc.

5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives of the decommissioning process are the removal of all radioactive material from the site that would restrict its future use and the termination of the NRC license(s). This currently requires the remediation of all radioactive material at the site in excess of applicable legal limits. Under the Atomic Energy Act,[34] the NRC is responsible for protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the production, utilization, and disposal of radioactive materials and processes. In particular, §71 defines radioactive material as it pertains to packaging and transportation and §61 specifies its disposition.

Most of the materials being transported for controlled burial are categorized as Low Specific Activity (LSA) or Surface Contaminated Object (SCO) materials containing Type A quantities, as defined in 49 CFR §173-178. Shipping containers are required to be Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2 or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411). For this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete. Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.

The volumes of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site is shown on a line-item basis in Appendices C, D, and E and summarized in Tables 5.1 through 5.3. The quantified waste volume summaries shown in these tables are consistent with §61 classifications. The volumes are calculated based on the exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the displaced volume of components serving as their own waste containers.

The reactor vessel and internals are categorized as large quantity shipments and, accordingly, will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners.

In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste),

where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.

No process system containing/handling radioactive substances at shutdown is presumed to meet material release criteria by decay alone, i.e., systems radioactive at shutdown will still be radioactive over the time period during which the decommissioning is accomplished, due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002 Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 2 of 5 TLG Services, Inc.

While the dose rates decrease with time, radionuclides such as 137Cs will still control the disposition requirements.

The waste material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of Oyster Creek is primarily generated during Period 2 of the DECON alternative and Period 4 of the deferred alternatives. Material that is considered potentially contaminated when removed from the radiologically controlled area is sent to processing facilities in Tennessee for conditioning and disposal. Heavily contaminated components and activated materials are routed for controlled disposal. The disposal volumes reported in the tables reflect the savings resulting from reprocessing and recycling.

Disposal fees are calculated using current disposal agreements, with surcharges added for the highly activated components, for example, generated in the segmentation of the reactor vessel. The majority of the material generated from the decontamination and dismantling activities (approximately 94% for the DECON alternative) is Class A waste. The disposal cost for this material is based upon Exelons current agreement with EnergySolutions for its disposal facility in Clive, Utah. Another 5% of the total volume (also Class A) is assumed to be sent to the Barnwell facility.

Since the EnergySolutions facility is not able to accept the higher activity waste (Class B and C) generated in the decontamination of the reactor vessel and segmentation of the components closest to the core, the cost of disposal of this material (approximately 1% of the total volume) was based upon Exelons rates for the Barnwell facility.

A small quantity of material will be generated during the Oyster Creek decommissioning will not be considered suitable for near-surface disposal, and is assumed to be disposed of in a geologic repository, in a manner similar to that envisioned for spent fuel disposal. Such material, known as Greater-Than-Class-C or GTCC material, is estimated to require five spent fuel storage canisters (or the equivalent) to dispose of the most radioactive portions of the reactor vessel internals. The volume and weight reported in Tables 5.1 through 5.3 represent the packaged weight and volume of the spent fuel storage canisters.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002 Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 3 of 5 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 5.1 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

DECON Waste Volume Weight Class1 (cubic feet)

(pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste EnergySolutions (Clive, Utah)

Containerized A

123,335 6,922,273 Bulk A

262,559 20,911,740 Atlantic Compact (Barnwell, S.C.)

A 21,081 2,114,319 B

2,413 274,227 C

918 61,980 Geologic Repository (Greater-than-Class C)

>C 1,428 282,300 Total 411,735 30,566,839 Processed Waste (off-site) 401,427 17,169,570 Scrap Metal 48,668,000 1

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002 Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 4 of 5 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 5.2 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

DELAYED DECON Waste Volume Weight Class1 (cubic feet)

(pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste EnergySolutions (Clive, Utah)

Containerized A

50,941 2,824,673 Bulk A

241,514 19,067,090 Atlantic Compact (Barnwell, S.C.)

A 20,169 1,948,021 B

1,002 109,390 C

470 53,730 Geologic Repository (Greater-than-Class C)

>C 1,428 282,300 Total 315,523 24,285,204 Processed Waste (off-site) 470,429 19,975,460 Scrap Metal 48,584,000 1

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002 Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 5, Page 5 of 5 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 5.3 DECOMMISSIONING WASTE

SUMMARY

SAFSTOR Waste Volume Weight Class1 (cubic feet)

(pounds)

Low-Level Radioactive Waste EnergySolutions (Clive, Utah)

Containerized A

50,414 2,735,513 Bulk A

243,889 19,114,590 Atlantic Compact (Barnwell, S.C.)

A 20,686 1,936,101 B

1,127 121,830 C

344 41,290 Geologic Repository (Greater-than-Class C)

>C 1,428 282,300 Total 317,889 24,231,624 Processed Waste (off-site) 470,956 20,064,620 Scrap Metal 48,584,000 1

Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55 2

Columns may not add due to rounding.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 1 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

6. RESULTS The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Oyster Creek relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis prepared in 2008-09. While not an engineering study, the estimates provide Exelon with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.

The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements. The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the plants spent fuel pool for a minimum of five and one-half years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.

The spent fuel is removed from the site within fifteen years of final shutdown.

The cost projected to promptly decommission (DECON) Oyster Creek is estimated to be $899.7 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 74.0%) is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear unit so that the license can be terminated. Another 19.7% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel. The remaining 6.3% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.

The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 through 6.3, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.

Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost. The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program. It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that Exelon will oversee the decommissioning program, using a DOC to manage the decommissioning labor force and the associated subcontractors. The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities.

However, once the operating license is terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site.

As described in this report, the spent fuel pool will remain operational for approximately five and one-half years following the cessation of operations (DECON alternative). The pool will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created.

This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area.

Within this approximately five and one-half-year period, the spent fuel will be transferred to the ISFSI.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 2 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste. As described in Section 5, disposal of the majority of the radioactive material is at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah or some alternative facility. Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment, are packaged for geologic disposal. Disposal of these components is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.

A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility. Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction. The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities. The cost identified in the summary table for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.

Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.

Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon labor cost data supplied by Exelon. Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of the decommissioning process. The methods employed in decontamination and dismantling are generally destructive and indiscriminate in inflicting collateral damage.

With a

work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license. Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.

The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report. For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.

Decontamination is used to reduce the plants radiation fields and minimize worker exposure. Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ. Centralized processing centers have proven to be a

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 3 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear unit.

License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings. The status of any plant components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.

The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance. While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 4 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 6.1

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DECON (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Cost Percentage Decontamination 22,297 2.5%

Removal 148,522 16.5%

Packaging 22,786 2.5%

Transportation 17,598 2.0%

Waste Disposal 64,400 7.2%

Off-site Waste Processing 10,024 1.1%

Program Management [1]

417,042 46.4%

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 1.3%

Spent Fuel - Direct Expenditures [2]

100,110 11.1%

Insurance and Regulatory Fees 20,929 2.3%

Energy 13,156 1.5%

Characterization and Licensing Surveys 19,885 2.2%

Property Taxes 21,212 2.4%

Miscellaneous Equipment 6,800 0.8%

Site O&M 3,127 0.3%

Total [3]

899,710 100.0%

Cost Element Cost Percentage License Termination 665,975 74.0%

Spent Fuel Management 177,146 19.7%

Site Restoration 56,589 6.3%

Total [3]

899,710 100.0%

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 5 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 6.2

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS DELAYED DECON (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Cost Percentage Decontamination 23,573 2.6%

Removal 134,505 14.9%

Packaging 17,207 1.9%

Transportation 13,288 1.5%

Waste Disposal 39,463 4.4%

Off-site Waste Processing 11,541 1.3%

Program Management [1]

501,758 55.7%

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 1.3%

Spent Fuel - Direct Expenditures [2]

37,454 4.2%

Insurance and Regulatory Fees 25,123 2.8%

Energy 18,772 2.1%

Characterization and Licensing Surveys 21,402 2.4%

Property Taxes 25,586 2.8%

Miscellaneous Equipment 10,399 1.2%

Site O&M 8,327 0.9%

Total [3]

900,219 100.0%

Cost Element Cost Percentage License Termination 541,703 60.2%

Spent Fuel Management 299,125 33.2%

Site Restoration 59,390 6.6%

Total [3]

900,219 100.0%

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 6, Page 6 of 6 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE 6.3

SUMMARY

OF DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS SAFSTOR (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Cost Element Cost Percentage Decontamination 23,321 2.1%

Removal 137,788 12.3%

Packaging 16,136 1.4%

Transportation 11,848 1.1%

Waste Disposal 37,361 3.3%

Off-site Waste Processing 11,589 1.0%

Program Management [1]

556,588 49.9%

Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,822 1.1%

Spent Fuel - Direct Expenditures [2]

96,744 8.7%

Insurance and Regulatory Fees 57,478 5.1%

Energy 24,479 2.2%

Characterization and Licensing Surveys 21,402 1.9%

Property Taxes 68,922 6.2%

Miscellaneous Equipment 18,942 1.7%

Site O&M 21,895 2.0%

Total [3]

1,116,314 100.0%

Cost Element Cost Percentage License Termination 873,828 78.3%

Spent Fuel Management 183,117 16.4%

Site Restoration 59,369 5.3%

Total [3]

1,116,314 100.0%

[1]

Includes engineering and security costs

[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees

[3] Columns may not add due to rounding

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 1 of 3 TLG Services, Inc.

7. REFERENCES 1

Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Document No. E16-1555-010, Rev. 1, TLG Services, Inc., March 2009

2.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72, "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988

3.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," October 2003

4.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, Radiological Criteria for License Termination

5.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50, Entombment Options for Power Reactors, Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register Volume 66, Number 200, October 16, 2001

6.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50 and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,"

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61 (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996

7.

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, 42 U.S. Code 10101, et seq.

http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1327/ML13274A489.pdf#page=419

8.

Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future Charter, http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/brc/20120620215336/http://brc.gov/index.p hp?q=page/charter

9.

Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy, http://www.brc.gov/sites/default/files/documents

/brc_finalreport_jan2012.pdf, p. 32, January 2012

10.

Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, U.S. DOE, January 11, 2013

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 2 of 3 TLG Services, Inc.

7. REFERENCES (continued)

11.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, In Re:

Aiken County, Et Al., August 2013, http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/BAE0CF34F762EBD9852 57BC6004DEB18/$file/11-1271-1451347.pdf

12.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 961.11, Article IV -

Responsibilities of the Parties, B. DOE Responsibilities, 5.(a) DOE shall issue an annual acceptance priority ranking for receipt of SNF and/or HLW at the DOE repository. This priority ranking shall be based on the age of SNF and/or HLW as calculated from the date of discharge of such materials from the civilian nuclear power reactor. The oldest fuel or waste will have the highest priority for acceptance

13.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 72, Subpart K, General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites

14.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy, Public Law 96-573, 1980

15.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, Public Law 99-240, January 15, 1986

16.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste

17.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, Radiological Criteria for License Termination, Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 139 (p 39058 et seq.), July 21, 1997

18.

Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination, EPA Memorandum OSWER No. 9200.4-18, August 22, 1997

19.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16, Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 3 of 3 TLG Services, Inc.

7. REFERENCES (continued)

20.

Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites, OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002

21.

Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM),

NUREG/CR-1575, Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, August 2000

22.

T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986

23.

W.J. Manion and T.S. LaGuardia, "Decommissioning Handbook," U.S.

Department of Energy, DOE/EV/10128-1, November 1980

24.

"Building Construction Cost Data 2011," Robert Snow Means Company, Inc.,

Kingston, Massachusetts

25.

Project and Cost Engineers Handbook, Second Edition, p. 239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984

26.

Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System Waste Acceptance System Requirements Document, Revision 5, ICN01 (DOE/RW-0351) effective March 10, 2008

27.

"Strategy for Management and Disposal of Greater-Than-Class C Low-Level Radioactive Waste, Federal Register Volume 60, Number 48 (p 13424 et seq.),

March 1995

28.

U.S. Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, "Transportation," Parts 173 through 178, 1996

29.

Tri-State Motor Transit Company, published tariffs, Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-427719 Rules Tariff, March 2004, Radioactive Materials Tariff, February 2011

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Section 7, Page 4 of 3 TLG Services, Inc.

7. REFERENCES (continued)

30.

J.C. Evans et al., "Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. August 1984

31.

R.I. Smith, G.J. Konzek, W.E. Kennedy, Jr., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station,"

NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1978

32.

H.D. Oak, et al., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1980

33.

"Microsoft Project 2010," Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, 2003

34.

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, (68 Stat. 919)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 1 of 4 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 2 of 4 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example:

Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger < 3,000 lbs.

1.

SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing < 3,000 lbs. will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected from the inlet and outlet piping. The heat exchanger will be sent to the waste processing area.

2.

CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes)

(minutes)*

a Remove insulation 60 (b) b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 c

Install contamination controls 20 (b) d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e

Cap openings 20 (d) f Rig for removal 30 30 g

Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h

Remove contamination controls 15 15 i

Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):

+ Respiratory protection adjustment (25% of critical duration) 64

+ Radiation/ALARA adjustment (30% of critical duration) 77 Adjusted work duration 396

+ Protective clothing adjustment (30% of adjusted duration) 119 Productive work duration 515

+ Work break adjustment (8.33 % of productive duration) 43 Total work duration (minutes) 558

• • • Total duration = 9.300 hr ***

• Alpha designators indicate activities that can be performed in parallel

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 3 of 4 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX A (Continued)

3.

LABOR REQUIRED Duration Rate Crew Number (Hours)

($/hr)

Cost Laborers 3.00 9.300 50.59 1,411.46 Craftsmen 2.00 9.300 72.91 1,356.13 Foreman 1.00 9.300 77.72 722.80 General Foreman 0.25 9.300 83.77 194.77 Fire Watch 0.05 9.300 50.59 23.52 Health Physics Technician 1.00 9.300 56.70 527.31 Total labor cost

$4,235.99

4.

EQUIPMENT & CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs none Consumables/Materials Costs Blotting paper 50 @ $0.58/sq ft [1]

$29.00 Tarpaulin, oil resistant, fire retardant 50 @ $0.43/sq ft [2]

$21.50 Gas torch consumables 1 @ $11.07 x 1 /hr [3]

$11.07 Subtotal cost of equipment and materials

$61.57 Overhead & profit on equipment and materials @ 17.00 %

$10.47 Total costs, equipment & material

$72.04 TOTAL COST:

Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pounds:

$4,308.03 Total labor cost:

$4,235.99 Total equipment/material costs:

$72.04 Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:

67.89

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix A, Page 4 of 4 TLG Services, Inc.

5.

NOTES AND REFERENCES Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forums (now NEI) program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.

References for equipment & consumables costs:

1. www.mcmaster.com online catalog, McMaster Carr Spill Control (7193T88)

2. R.S. Means (2011) Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0600, page 20

3. R.S. Means (2011) Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, page 664 Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Forked River, New Jersey.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 1 of 7 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 2 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 0.58 Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 6.04 Removal of clean pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 8.74 Removal of clean pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 17.42 Removal of clean pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 33.29 Removal of clean pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 43.19 Removal of clean pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 63.57 Removal of clean pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 75.57 Removal of clean valve >2 to 4 inches 115.38 Removal of clean valve >4 to 8 inches 174.18 Removal of clean valve >8 to 14 inches 332.93 Removal of clean valve >14 to 20 inches 431.87 Removal of clean valve >20 to 36 inches 635.66 Removal of clean valve >36 inches 755.68 Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping 36.93 Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping 132.67 Removal of clean pump, <300 pound 291.70 Removal of clean pump, 300-1000 pound 820.63 Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound 3,242.22 Removal of clean pump, >10,000 pound 6,262.89 Removal of clean pump motor, 300-1000 pound 345.82 Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 1,351.36 Removal of clean pump motor, >10,000 pound 3,040.55 Removal of clean heat exchanger <3000 pound 1,740.87 Removal of clean heat exchanger >3000 pound 4,371.81 Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator 12,325.01 Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater 25,340.92 Removal of clean tank, <300 gallons 375.45 Removal of clean tank, 300-3000 gallon 1,187.89 Removal of clean tank, >3000 gallons, $/square foot surface area 10.04

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Removal of clean electrical equipment, <300 pound 160.20 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 563.03 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,126.06 Removal of clean electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 2,696.17 Removal of clean electrical transformer < 30 tons 1,872.46 Removal of clean electrical transformer > 30 tons 5,392.33 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, <100 kW 1,912.54 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW 4,268.93 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, >1 MW 8,837.56 Removal of clean electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 14.90 Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear foot 6.50 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, <300 pound 160.20 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 563.03 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,126.06 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 2,696.17 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, <300 pound 193.70 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 676.53 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 1,348.30 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 2,696.17 Removal of clean HVAC ductwork, $/pound 0.61 Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 1.52 Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 22.14 Removal of contaminated pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 37.12 Removal of contaminated pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 60.02 Removal of contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 115.23 Removal of contaminated pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 137.67 Removal of contaminated pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 189.97 Removal of contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 225.52 Removal of contaminated valve >2 to 4 inches 453.26 Removal of contaminated valve >4 to 8 inches 534.38

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 4 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Removal of contaminated valve >8 to 14 inches 1,093.21 Removal of contaminated valve >14 to 20 inches 1,384.29 Removal of contaminated valve >20 to 36 inches 1,840.57 Removal of contaminated valve >36 inches 2,196.14 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 143.96 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping 474.77 Removal of contaminated pump, <300 pound 940.71 Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound 2,195.08 Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound 7,271.71 Removal of contaminated pump, >10,000 pound 17,655.09 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound 953.80 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 2,961.81 Removal of contaminated pump motor, >10,000 pound 6,664.50 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pound 4,308.03 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger >3000 pound 12,499.36 Removal of contaminated feedwater heater/deaerator 31,262.00 Removal of contaminated moisture separator/reheater 68,239.01 Removal of contaminated tank, <300 gallons 1,566.16 Removal of contaminated tank, >300 gallons, $/square foot 31.54 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, <300 pound 731.65 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,791.81 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,442.77 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 6,950.88 Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 35.67 Removal of contaminated electrical conduit, $/linear foot 18.17 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, <300 pound 820.17 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 2,015.63 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,872.06 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 6,950.88 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, <300 pound 820.17

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 5 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 2,015.63 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 3,872.06 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 6,950.88 Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork, $/pound 2.10 Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components, $/linear in.

4.02 Additional decontamination of surface by washing, $/square foot 8.21 Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing, $/square foot 37.06 Decontamination rig hook up and flush, $/ 250 foot length 6,904.99 Chemical flush of components/systems, $/gallon 18.43 Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete, $/cubic yard 163.02 Removal of grade slab concrete, $/cubic yard 215.45 Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 414.96 Removal of sections of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 1,258.40 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 270.73 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 2,113.63 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 342.28 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 2,787.73 Removal heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar & steel embedments, $/cubic yard 533.01 Removal of below-grade suspended floors, $/cubic yard 414.96 Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 1,054.73 Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 2,101.37 Removal of clean foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 826.68 Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 1,955.13 Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard 36.25 Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 107.84 Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 299.44 Removal of clean solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 107.84 Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 299.44 Backfill of below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 33.82 Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear foot 130.49

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 6 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Placement of concrete for below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 137.69 Excavation of clean material, $/cubic yard 3.67 Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic yard 39.90 Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard 25.95 Removal of contaminated concrete rubble, $/cubic yard 27.45 Removal of building by volume, $/cubic foot 0.35 Removal of clean building metal siding, $/square foot 1.32 Removal of contaminated building metal siding, $/square foot 3.80 Removal of standard asphalt roofing, $/square foot 2.71 Removal of transite panels, $/square foot 2.51 Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill & spall), $/square foot 12.37 Scabbling contaminated concrete floors, $/square foot 7.46 Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, $/square foot 20.05 Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square foot 68.73 Scabbling structural steel, $/square foot 6.27 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail < 10 ton capacity 798.67 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail < 10 ton capacity 1,870.00 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail >10-50 ton capacity 1,916.79 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail >10-50 ton capacity 4,471.00 Removal of polar crane > 50 ton capacity 8,055.49 Removal of gantry crane > 50 ton capacity 33,702.09 Removal of structural steel, $/pound 0.25 Removal of clean steel floor grating, $/square foot 5.75 Removal of contaminated steel floor grating, $/square foot 13.56 Removal of clean free standing steel liner, $/square foot 15.05 Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner, $/square foot 36.48 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 7.52 Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 42.43 Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, $/square foot 18.75 Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas, $/square foot 27.59

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix B, Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)

Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit TLG Services, Inc.

Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre 30,563.66 Cost of CPC B-88 LSA box & preparation for use 2,267.67 Cost of CPC B-25 LSA box & preparation for use 2,077.38 Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box & preparation for use 1,691.68 Cost of CPC B-144 LSA box & preparation for use 11,450.82 Cost of LSA drum & preparation for use 219.29 Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (resins) 8,414.66 Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (filters) 8,795.03 Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square foot 0.90

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix C, Page 1 of 16 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 2 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD1aShutdownthroughTransition Period1aDirectDecommissioningActivities 1a.1.1 Preparepreliminarydecommissioningcost

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.2 NotificationofCessationofOperations a

1a.1.3 Removefuel&sourcematerial n/a 1a.1.4 NotificationofPermanentDefueling a

1a.1.5 Deactivateplantsystems&processwaste a

1a.1.6 PrepareandsubmitPSDAR

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.7 Reviewplantdwgs&specs.

550

83

633

633

4,600

1a.1.8 Performdetailedradsurvey a

1a.1.9 Estimatebyproductinventory

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.10 Endproductdescription

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.11 Detailedbyproductinventory

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.12 Definemajorworksequence

897

135

1,032

1,032

7,500

1a.1.13 PerformSERandEA

371

56

427

427

3,100

1a.1.14 PerformSiteSpecificCostStudy

598

90

688

688

5,000

1a.1.15 Prepare/submitLicenseTerminationPlan

490

74

564

564

4,096

1a.1.16 ReceiveNRCapprovalofterminationplan a

ActivitySpecifications 1a.1.17.1 Plant&temporaryfacilities

589

88

677

609

68

4,920

1a.1.17.2 Plantsystems

499

75

573

516

57

4,167

1a.1.17.3 NSSSDecontaminationFlush

60

9

69

69

500

1a.1.17.4 Reactorinternals

850

127

977

977

7,100

1a.1.17.5 Reactorvessel

778

117

894

894

6,500

1a.1.17.6 Sacrificialshield

60

9

69

69

500

1a.1.17.7 Moistureseparators/reheaters

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.17.8 Reinforcedconcrete

191

29

220

110

110

1,600

1a.1.17.9 MainTurbine

250

37

287

287

2,088

1a.1.17.10 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

1a.1.17.11 Pressuresuppressionstructure

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.17.12 Drywell

191

29

220

220

1,600

1a.1.17.13 Plantstructures&buildings

373

56

429

215

215

3,120

1a.1.17.14 Wastemanagement

550

83

633

633

4,600

1a.1.17.15 Facility&sitecloseout

108

16

124

62

62

900

1a.1.17 Total

5,107

766

5,873

5,361

512

42,683

Planning&SitePreparations 1a.1.18 Preparedismantlingsequence

287

43

330

330

2,400

1a.1.19 Plantprep.&temp.svces

2,800

420

3,220

3,220

1a.1.20 Designwatercleanupsystem

168

25

193

193

1,400

1a.1.21 Rigging/Cont.CntrlEnvlps/tooling/etc.

2,200

330

2,530

2,530

1a.1.22 Procurecasks/liners&containers

147

22

169

169

1,230

1a.1 SubtotalPeriod1aActivityCosts

14,406

2,161

16,566

16,055

512

78,609

Period1aAdditionalCosts 1a.2.1 ISFSIExpansion

6,000

900

6,900

6,900

1a.2 SubtotalPeriod1aAdditionalCosts

6,000

900

6,900

6,900

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 3 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period1aCollateralCosts 1a.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

10,978

1,647

12,624

12,624

1a.3 SubtotalPeriod1aCollateralCosts

10,978

1,647

12,624

12,624

Period1aPeriodDependentCosts 1a.4.1 Insurance

2,227

223

2,450

2,450

1a.4.2 Propertytaxes

1a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

469

117

586

586

1a.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

462

69

531

531

1a.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

14

10

35

12

70

70

610

12,190

20

1a.4.6 Plantenergybudget

1,918

288

2,206

2,206

1a.4.7 NRCFees

769

77

846

846

1a.4.8 EmergencyPlanningFees

564

56

621

621

1a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

309

46

355

355

1a.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

763

114

878

878

1a.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

89

13

103

103

1a.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

8,441

1,266

9,707

9,707

157,471

1a.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

33,041

4,956

37,997

37,997

423,400

1a.4 SubtotalPeriod1aPeriodDependentCosts

931

14

10

35

48,122

7,238

56,350

54,749

1,601

610

12,190

20

580,871

1a.0 TOTALPERIOD1aCOST

931

14

10

35

79,506

11,946

92,441

70,804

21,126

512

610

12,190

20

659,480

PERIOD1bDecommissioningPreparations Period1bDirectDecommissioningActivities DetailedWorkProcedures 1b.1.1.1 Plantsystems

566

85

651

586

65

4,733

1b.1.1.2 NSSSDecontaminationFlush

120

18

138

138

1,000

1b.1.1.3 Reactorinternals

479

72

550

550

4,000

1b.1.1.4 Remainingbuildings

162

24

186

46

139

1,350

1b.1.1.5 CRDhousings&NIs

120

18

138

138

1,000

1b.1.1.6 Incoreinstrumentation

120

18

138

138

1,000

1b.1.1.7 Removalprimarycontainment

239

36

275

275

2,000

1b.1.1.8 Reactorvessel

434

65

499

499

3,630

1b.1.1.9 Facilitycloseout

144

22

165

83

83

1,200

1b.1.1.10 Sacrificialshield

144

22

165

165

1,200

1b.1.1.11 Reinforcedconcrete

120

18

138

69

69

1,000

1b.1.1.12 MainTurbine

249

37

286

286

2,080

1b.1.1.13 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

1b.1.1.14 Moistureseparators&reheaters

239

36

275

275

2,000

1b.1.1.15 Radwastebuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

1b.1.1.16 Reactorbuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

1b.1.1 Total

4,037

606

4,643

4,212

431

33,741

1b.1.2 DeconNSSS 1,105

552

1,657

1,657

1,067

1b.1 SubtotalPeriod1bActivityCosts 1,105

4,037

1,158

6,300

5,869

431

1,067

33,741

Period1bAdditionalCosts 1b.2.1 Spentfuelpoolisolation

10,280

1,542

11,822

11,822

1b.2.2 SiteCharacterization

4,986

1,496

6,482

6,482

27,140

9,952

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 4 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period1bAdditionalCosts(continued) 1b.2.3 DispositionofLiquidRCRAWaste(notLead)

17

529

135

680

680

2,019

115,076

1b.2.4 DispositionofPCBSoilRCRAWaste(notLead)

1,362

1,450

567

3,378

3,378

27,000

3,240,000

1b.2.5 DispositionOfLeadInventory

26

756

117

899

899

328

232,673

1b.2.6 AsbestosRemediation

12,217

2

279

1,030

3,354

16,883

16,883

19,193

249,515

150,230

1b.2 SubtotalPeriod1bAdditionalCosts

12,217

2

1,684

756

3,009

15,266

7,211

40,144

40,144

328

48,212

3,837,264

177,370

9,952

Period1bCollateralCosts 1b.3.1 Deconequipment 902

135

1,037

1,037

1b.3.2 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

1b.3.3 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 71

31

85

153

90

430

430

449

26,940

88

1b.3.4 Processdecommissioningchemicalflushwaste 3

101

373

5,544

1,454

7,475

7,475

1,495

159,317

280

1b.3.5 Smalltoolallowance

186

28

213

213

1b.3.6 Pipecuttingequipment

1,100

165

1,265

1,265

1b.3.7 Deconrig 1,500

225

1,725

1,725

1b.3.8 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

5,564

835

6,399

6,399

1b.3 SubtotalPeriod1bCollateralCosts 2,476

1,286

132

458

5,698

6,688

3,100

19,837

13,438

6,399

449

1,495

186,257

367

Period1bPeriodDependentCosts 1b.4.1 Deconsupplies 28

7

35

35

1b.4.2 Insurance

849

85

934

934

1b.4.3 Propertytaxes

1,221

122

1,343

1,343

1b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

920

230

1,150

1,150

1b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

234

35

269

269

1b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

8

6

21

7

42

42

362

7,234

12

1b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

1,944

292

2,236

2,236

1b.4.8 NRCFees

390

39

429

429

1b.4.9 EmergencyPlanningFees

286

29

315

315

1b.4.10 SiteO&MCosts

157

24

180

180

1b.4.11 SpentFuelPoolO&M

387

58

445

445

1b.4.12 ISFSIOperatingCosts

45

7

52

52

1b.4.13 SecurityStaffCost

4,278

642

4,920

4,920

79,814

1b.4.14 DOCStaffCost

5,599

840

6,439

6,439

64,486

1b.4.15 UtilityStaffCost

16,820

2,523

19,343

19,343

215,657

1b.4 SubtotalPeriod1bPeriodDependentCosts 28

1,154

8

6

21

31,977

4,938

38,132

37,320

812

362

7,234

12

359,957

1b.0 TOTALPERIOD1bCOST 3,609

14,657

142

2,148

756

8,727

57,968

16,406

104,413

96,772

7,210

431

328

49,023

1,495

4,030,755

178,816

403,650

PERIOD1TOTALS 3,609

15,588

156

2,158

756

8,762

137,473

28,352

196,854

167,576

28,336

943

328

49,633

1,495

4,042,945

178,836

1,063,130

PERIOD2aLargeComponentRemoval Period2aDirectDecommissioningActivities NuclearSteamSupplySystemRemoval 2a.1.1.2 RecirculationPumps&Motors 52

122

41

141

8

216

137

717

717

107

1,053

196,350

2,938

2a.1.1.3 CRDMs&NIsRemoval 199

179

523

183

137

258

1,478

1,478

5,179

112,850

5,509

2a.1.1.4 ReactorVesselInternals 163

3,054

7,122

2,158

11,058

244

10,257

34,055

34,055

1,252

918

918

309,830

26,675

1,199

2a.1.1.5 ReactorVessel 98

6,613

2,130

1,718

2,333

244

7,174

20,310

20,310

14,674

1,573,112

26,675

1,199

2a.1.1 Totals 511

9,968

9,816

4,200

8

13,743

488

17,826

56,561

56,561

107

22,159

918

918

2,192,142

61,797

2,398

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 5 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours RemovalofMajorEquipment 2a.1.2 MainTurbine/Generator

374

1,869

451

1,622

263

657

5,236

5,236

76,676

3,843

3,668,086

5,691

2a.1.3 MainCondensers

1,125

1,297

313

1,125

183

672

4,714

4,714

53,200

2,666

2,545,038

17,138

DisposalofPlantSystems NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 2a.1.7.1 7EB 114

185

12

11

4

32

114

471

471

215

462

34,932

4,350

2a.1.7.2 N2G

13

0

0

1

1

4

18

18

40

8

2,090

202

2a.1.7.3 N2P

27

1

2

6

1

8

46

46

324

14

13,964

411

2a.1.7.4 N3A

77

5

4

5

10

23

123

123

237

140

17,648

1,160

2a.1.7.5 N3D

91

3

3

8

5

26

136

136

419

72

21,112

1,440

2a.1.7.6 N3I

19

0

0

0

1

5

26

26

19

12

1,460

308

2a.1.7.7 N3N

113

5

4

6

9

33

169

169

288

138

19,541

1,744

2a.1.7.8 N3P

29

2

2

2

4

9

47

47

118

53

7,792

439

2a.1.7.9 N3Q

20

0

1

1

1

5

28

28

67

12

3,381

309

2a.1.7.10 N3R

19

1

1

1

2

6

30

30

62

30

4,242

299

2a.1.7.11 N3S

29

1

1

3

2

8

44

44

158

25

7,828

454

2a.1.7.12 N3T

17

1

0

1

1

5

25

25

42

14

2,501

276

2a.1.7.13 N3U

126

20

18

6

55

51

275

275

317

801

58,171

1,957

2a.1.7.14 N3W

130

22

20

6

60

53

291

291

333

872

62,848

2,026

2a.1.7.15 N3Y

235

22

25

42

50

83

457

457

2,216

724

131,007

3,647

2a.1.7.16 N51 22

32

1

1

4

2

20

83

83

213

22

9,918

832

2a.1.7.17 N52 15

26

2

2

1

6

16

69

69

68

88

7,641

640

2a.1.7.18 N53 22

40

4

4

3

11

25

110

110

144

165

14,952

962

2a.1.7.19 N54 5

19

1

1

1

3

8

38

38

27

44

3,559

367

2a.1.7.20 N55

82

3

3

6

5

23

123

123

336

68

17,502

1,300

2a.1.7.21 N56

109

7

7

9

15

34

181

181

481

220

32,049

1,597

2a.1.7.22 N5A 38

48

2

3

4

5

34

135

135

226

81

13,609

1,321

2a.1.7.23 N5B 28

45

1

2

5

1

27

109

109

286

18

12,631

1,110

2a.1.7.24 N5C

20

2

1

1

3

6

33

33

49

49

4,789

304

2a.1.7.25 N5D

31

2

2

1

5

10

51

51

75

67

6,878

484

2a.1.7.26 N5E

21

2

1

1

4

7

35

35

49

52

4,983

317

2a.1.7.27 N5F

30

2

2

1

6

10

51

51

51

80

6,642

464

2a.1.7.28 N5G 1

15

0

0

0

1

5

23

23

23

15

1,797

242

2a.1.7.29 N5H

12

1

1

0

2

4

20

20

1

29

1,704

194

2a.1.7.30 N5I 10

18

1

1

0

2

10

42

42

26

22

2,322

442

2a.1.7.31 N5J

13

1

1

2

2

4

23

23

99

28

5,599

212

2a.1.7.32 N5K

17

1

1

1

1

5

25

25

56

16

3,223

256

2a.1.7.33 N5N

32

1

1

2

1

9

45

45

125

15

5,947

494

2a.1.7.34 N5O

81

4

4

11

5

24

130

130

579

80

28,042

1,264

2a.1.7.35 N5P

30

3

3

2

8

11

57

57

121

115

11,189

487

2a.1.7.36 N5Q

30

3

3

2

7

10

56

56

121

114

11,082

480

2a.1.7.37 N5S

72

8

12

38

11

29

171

171

2,012

159

90,750

1,167

2a.1.7.38 N5T 65

68

4

5

9

10

54

216

216

482

146

27,568

2,004

2a.1.7.39 N5U 65

69

4

5

9

10

55

217

217

483

147

27,630

2,019

2a.1.7.40 N5Y 16

27

1

1

2

3

16

66

66

124

44

7,504

653

2a.1.7.41 N5Z 16

27

1

1

2

3

16

66

66

124

44

7,504

653

2a.1.7.42 PPA

85

3

4

9

6

25

133

133

468

91

24,149

1,308

2a.1.7 Totals 417

2,230

161

163

223

368

932

4,494

4,494

11,707

5,395

779,680

40,595

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 6 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 2a.1.8.1 7BA

92

4

4

6

10

27

143

143

317

140

20,810

1,436

2a.1.8.2 7DA

54

6

6

1

18

20

105

105

56

263

17,183

836

2a.1.8.3 7FA 2

25

2

3

3

6

10

51

51

148

93

11,278

415

2a.1.8.4 PBA 114

170

18

16

10

46

117

493

493

544

688

60,422

4,293

2a.1.8.5 PDA 12

60

2

3

5

6

24

112

112

277

83

15,938

1,107

2a.1.8.6 PMA

14

1

1

1

1

4

21

21

32

18

2,350

217

2a.1.8.7 PRA

92

3

5

15

5

28

148

148

763

78

35,407

1,455

2a.1.8.8 PTK/PTP

15

0

0

1

0

4

20

20

28

1

1,211

232

2a.1.8 Totals 128

522

37

38

41

93

233

1,091

1,091

2,166

1,364

164,599

9,991

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 2a.1.9.1 7CA 182

298

34

30

22

81

197

842

842

1,163

1,174

113,971

6,303

2a.1.9.2 TB2

1,081

82

93

170

177

362

1,965

1,965

8,921

2,579

508,624

16,709

2a.1.9.3 TB23

5

0

0

1

0

1

8

8

40

1

1,711

83

2a.1.9.4 TB38

16

1

1

1

3

5

28

28

75

42

5,430

230

2a.1.9.5 TC2

1,753

373

399

524

919

844

4,813

4,813

27,433

13,399

1,873,979

27,653

2a.1.9.6 TE2

186

23

27

51

50

73

410

410

2,649

730

149,011

2,845

2a.1.9.7 TEE

365

13

22

72

19

111

603

603

3,794

277

169,779

5,611

2a.1.9.8 TEG

26

1

1

2

3

8

41

41

89

43

6,078

382

2a.1.9.9 TP2

192

17

19

40

34

67

368

368

2,092

490

112,797

2,999

2a.1.9.10 TP3

126

14

14

10

37

46

248

248

546

561

53,095

2,029

2a.1.9.11 TPE

115

15

13

8

36

42

229

229

408

541

46,636

1,789

2a.1.9 Totals 182

4,162

573

620

901

1,360

1,757

9,554

9,554

47,212

19,838

3,041,110

66,633

2a.1.12 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

1,076

27

7

22

8

278

1,419

1,419

1,057

112

53,901

19,311

2a.1 SubtotalPeriod2aActivityCosts 1,237

19,457

13,779

5,792

3,944

16,018

488

22,355

83,070

83,070

192,124

55,377

918

918

12,444,560

221,157

2,398

Period2aCollateralCosts 2a.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 161

72

195

352

205

985

985

1,031

61,862

201

2a.3.2 Processdecommissioningchemicalflushwaste 1

26

97

235

76

435

435

388

41,295

73

2a.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

269

40

309

278

31

2a.3.4 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

13,835

2,075

15,910

15,910

2a.3 SubtotalPeriod2aCollateralCosts 162

269

98

291

587

13,835

2,397

17,639

1,698

15,910

31

1,419

103,157

274

Period2aPeriodDependentCosts 2a.4.1 Deconsupplies 69

17

87

87

2a.4.2 Insurance

1,684

168

1,852

1,852

2a.4.3 Propertytaxes

2,422

242

2,665

2,398

266

2a.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

1,567

392

1,958

1,958

2a.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

2,533

380

2,913

2,913

2a.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

102

72

253

84

511

511

4,416

88,314

144

2a.4.7 Plantenergybudget

2,296

344

2,641

2,641

2a.4.8 NRCFees

904

90

994

994

2a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

390

58

448

448

2a.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

962

144

1,106

1,106

2a.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

113

17

130

130

2a.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

8,959

1,344

10,303

10,303

166,257

2a.4.13 DOCStaffCost

17,165

2,575

19,740

19,740

199,771

2a.4.14 UtilityStaffCost

29,498

4,425

33,923

33,923

371,943

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 7 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 2a.4 SubtotalPeriod2aPeriodDependentCosts 69

4,099

102

72

253

64,394

10,282

79,270

77,768

1,236

266

4,416

88,314

144

737,971

2a.0 TOTALPERIOD2aCOST 1,469

23,825

13,979

6,156

3,944

16,857

78,716

35,034

179,979

162,536

17,146

297

192,124

61,211

918

918

12,636,030

221,574

740,369

PERIOD2bSiteDecontamination Period2bDirectDecommissioningActivities NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 2b.1.3.1 N38

194

12

11

19

23

60

319

319

1,005

337

59,967

2,944

2b.1.3.2 N48

99

4

4

8

7

29

151

151

406

107

22,600

1,507

2b.1.3.3 N4A 15

34

3

3

2

9

19

85

85

109

127

11,494

701

2b.1.3.4 N4B 12

32

3

3

2

7

17

76

76

98

109

10,011

669

2b.1.3.5 N4D

101

7

5

4

15

31

163

163

210

217

20,822

1,539

2b.1.3.6 N4E

8

0

0

0

0

2

10

10

11

5

736

121

2b.1.3.7 N4F

21

1

1

1

3

7

34

34

51

41

4,416

330

2b.1.3.8 N4H

25

2

2

4

3

8

44

44

187

49

10,386

417

2b.1.3.9 N4K

27

2

1

2

3

8

43

43

129

41

7,565

417

2b.1.3.10 N4L

40

1

1

3

3

11

59

59

135

37

7,564

628

2b.1.3.11 N5R

87

3

5

18

4

27

144

144

967

53

42,284

1,364

2b.1.3.12 N5V 65

68

7

7

6

19

57

230

230

309

295

28,625

2,009

2b.1.3.13 N5W

11

0

0

0

0

3

13

13

9

0

405

169

2b.1.3.14 N5X 84

85

3

4

15

3

67

262

262

786

48

34,564

2,536

2b.1.3 Totals 176

831

47

50

84

100

346

1,633

1,633

4,412

1,465

261,438

15,352

OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 2b.1.4.1 ORWPreD&DDesludgeandDecon

229

34

263

263

3,197

2b.1.4.2 PRD

17

0

1

3

0

5

26

26

143

6

6,156

274

2b.1.4.3 PSB

157

7

9

18

15

48

253

253

950

214

50,690

2,440

2b.1.4.4 PTA

43

3

3

5

6

14

74

74

276

82

15,879

686

2b.1.4.5 PUA

233

15

13

16

32

72

381

381

860

459

61,058

3,599

2b.1.4.6 PUU

157

12

15

28

27

54

292

292

1,441

413

80,833

2,504

2b.1.4.7 PVA

9

0

0

0

0

2

12

12

12

1

524

148

2b.1.4.8 UAB

338

8

13

41

13

97

510

510

2,148

188

97,655

5,225

2b.1.4.9 UAS

233

7

12

41

8

69

369

369

2,128

128

93,445

3,622

2b.1.4 Totals

1,417

51

65

152

100

394

2,180

2,180

7,959

1,490

406,240

21,696

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 2b.1.5.1 TD2

67

4

4

5

9

21

110

110

241

130

17,177

1,004

2b.1.5.2 TF2

364

51

64

154

95

152

879

879

8,047

1,384

405,420

5,629

2b.1.5.3 TFG

26

1

1

3

1

7

39

39

134

14

6,251

414

2b.1.5.4 TG2

264

42

55

114

95

119

689

689

5,957

1,383

320,296

4,199

2b.1.5.5 TH2

515

120

130

138

324

262

1,490

1,490

7,240

4,729

562,006

8,167

2b.1.5.6 TKA

24

1

1

1

2

7

34

34

47

24

3,253

350

2b.1.5.7 TL2

112

11

9

7

24

37

199

199

358

344

34,042

1,692

2b.1.5.8 TMA

68

6

7

13

12

24

129

129

690

178

38,125

1,051

2b.1.5.9 TN2

359

31

36

62

70

125

683

683

3,260

1,023

190,382

5,575

2b.1.5.10 TO2

194

29

223

223

3,221

2b.1.5.11 TOA

99

4

6

18

6

30

162

162

917

84

42,017

1,497

2b.1.5.12 TOCR

74

5

9

30

6

26

150

150

1,590

87

69,536

1,062

2b.1.5.13 TOR

72

6

7

14

13

25

137

137

717

185

39,614

1,139

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 8 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours TurbineBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 2b.1.5.14 TOV

19

0

1

2

0

5

28

28

90

6

4,042

293

2b.1.5.15 TOW

115

8

14

45

12

42

236

236

2,346

181

105,569

1,765

2b.1.5.16 TOX/TOY

32

1

1

2

1

9

46

46

106

16

5,216

488

2b.1.5.17 TS2

225

29

33

52

69

89

496

496

2,704

1,009

167,033

3,439

2b.1.5.18 TTA

67

6

7

13

13

24

130

130

675

194

38,390

1,085

2b.1.5.19 TU2

210

9

13

35

16

65

347

347

1,825

234

87,369

3,270

2b.1.5 Totals

2,906

334

395

705

769

1,098

6,207

5,984

223

36,944

11,206

2,135,738

45,340

AugmentedOffgasSystemComponents 2b.1.6.1 AY8

161

13

14

20

33

55

297

297

1,044

475

69,386

2,486

2b.1.6.2 AYA

34

3

4

7

8

12

69

69

384

110

21,817

527

2b.1.6.3 AYB

32

2

2

4

4

10

53

53

208

51

11,355

504

2b.1.6.4 AYC

82

4

6

17

7

26

141

141

899

97

41,912

1,279

2b.1.6.5 AYE

28

2

1

1

4

8

44

44

43

52

4,754

428

2b.1.6.6 AZ8

61

4

4

9

7

19

104

104

492

103

25,832

941

2b.1.6.7 AZA

14

1

0

0

1

4

20

20

24

15

1,797

215

2b.1.6.8 AZC

117

4

6

20

6

35

188

188

1,046

86

47,345

1,791

2b.1.6.9 AZD

20

1

1

1

2

6

30

30

40

31

3,402

307

2b.1.6.10 AZE

19

1

1

1

2

5

29

29

39

27

3,151

295

2b.1.6.11 AZF

17

1

1

1

2

5

27

27

65

22

3,914

274

2b.1.6.12 AZI

33

1

2

6

1

10

54

54

322

19

14,113

526

2b.1.6 Totals

618

36

43

88

75

196

1,056

1,056

4,607

1,088

248,777

9,574

MiscellaneousSystemComponents 2b.1.7.1 BAA

295

19

23

50

38

96

520

520

2,608

547

136,965

4,556

2b.1.7.2 BBA

100

6

11

39

9

35

200

200

2,039

124

89,851

1,559

2b.1.7.3 BDA

12

0

0

0

0

3

17

17

21

5

1,132

190

2b.1.7.4 CAA

694

27

52

185

32

220

1,211

1,211

9,683

489

419,874

10,902

2b.1.7.5 DAA

72

3

3

5

6

21

110

110

277

86

16,118

1,145

2b.1.7.6 DAC

172

5

7

21

8

50

263

263

1,094

117

51,066

2,672

2b.1.7.7 DGB

82

12

94

94

1,336

2b.1.7.8 DOT

14

2

16

16

223

2b.1.7.9 DPH

95

14

109

109

1,527

2b.1.7.10 DWF

22

3

25

25

360

2b.1.7.11 FWP

127

19

146

146

2,018

2b.1.7.12 INTAKESTRUCTURE

199

30

229

229

3,218

2b.1.7.13 MAA

142

11

13

19

27

48

260

260

1,013

392

63,370

2,192

2b.1.7.14 MBA

51

3

3

6

7

16

87

87

290

107

17,813

769

2b.1.7.15 MBS/MBT

38

1

1

1

2

10

54

54

71

32

4,701

577

2b.1.7.16 MS

40

6

46

46

676

2b.1.7.17 NMBROOF

20

3

22

22

312

2b.1.7.18 OB

292

44

336

336

4,806

2b.1.7.19 PTB

43

6

49

49

688

2b.1.7.20 RSFROOF

29

0

1

3

1

8

42

42

166

8

7,167

452

2b.1.7.21 UYARD

1,807

46

52

81

110

504

2,599

2,599

4,250

1,645

263,340

21,795

2b.1.7.22 WAA

166

8

10

17

19

51

271

271

878

275

51,268

2,492

2b.1.7.23 WHS

19

3

22

22

318

2b.1.7.24 YARDAREAS

351

53

404

404

5,688

2b.1.7.25 YDA/YFA/YLA

2

0

0

0

0

1

3

3

18

1

796

30

2b.1.7 Totals

4,885

130

176

428

258

1,259

7,136

5,637

1,500

22,409

3,827

1,123,463

70,499

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 9 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 2b.1.8 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

1,345

34

9

28

10

348

1,774

1,774

1,321

140

67,377

24,139

DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 2b.1.9.1 NewRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

167

103

156

0

233

134

794

794

6

4,340

382,187

2,526

2b.1.9.2 OldRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

4

11

17

0

25

11

68

68

6

461

40,787

73

2b.1.9.3 TurbineBuildingSystemsRemoval

469

249

376

561

339

1,993

1,993

10,447

919,350

6,185

2b.1.9.4 AugmentedOffGasDecon 40

258

30

45

1

67

112

554

554

45

1,256

112,340

4,323

2b.1.9.5 LLRWStorageDecon 23

83

18

27

41

48

240

240

758

66,660

1,490

2b.1.9.6 MiscellaneousBuildingsDecon 22

110

18

27

40

54

271

271

745

65,556

1,886

2b.1.9.7 NewRadwasteBuildingDecon 105

980

115

175

4

259

401

2,040

2,040

235

4,829

434,128

15,639

2b.1.9.8 OldRadwasteBuildingDecon

912

474

718

3

1,070

651

3,828

3,828

152

19,923

1,759,171

10,889

2b.1.9.9 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon 170

1,105

72

110

163

426

2,046

2,046

3,043

267,756

18,826

2b.1.9.10 TurbineBuilding0ftDecon 150

1,123

113

171

22

251

459

2,288

2,288

1,144

4,660

454,804

18,446

2b.1.9.11 TurbineBuilding23ftDecon 105

797

86

130

21

190

330

1,660

1,660

1,109

3,527

353,718

13,021

2b.1.9.12 TurbineBuilding46ftDecon 65

276

51

77

115

147

731

731

2,146

188,826

4,839

2b.1.9.13 DrywellDecon 5

814

458

523

1,263

646

3,707

3,707

19,950

1,351,210

11,073

2b.1.9.14 DrywellLinerRemoval 2,320

1,335

74

105

422

71

1,598

5,924

5,924

22,108

1,022

956,216

53,760

2b.1.9.15 RB0TorusRemoval 3,110

1,531

110

156

626

105

2,092

7,728

7,728

32,774

1,515

1,417,560

67,988

2b.1.9.16 ReactorBuildingSystemsRemoval

7

18

27

40

17

108

108

736

64,800

111

2b.1.9.17 ReactorBuilding19ftDecon 65

504

51

78

39

108

208

1,053

1,053

2,052

1,994

255,644

8,152

2b.1.9.18 ReactorBuilding119ftDecon 513

655

27

40

30

54

447

1,765

1,765

1,563

980

147,532

17,352

2b.1.9.19 ReactorBuilding23ftDecon 48

288

38

57

85

130

647

647

1,591

140,034

4,847

2b.1.9.20 ReactorBuilding51ftDecon 53

302

42

64

95

140

696

696

1,775

156,192

5,106

2b.1.9.21 ReactorBuilding75ftDecon 18

161

14

21

32

62

308

308

594

52,272

2,605

2b.1.9 Totals 6,811

11,882

2,171

3,100

1,168

4,867

8,450

38,448

38,448

61,196

86,292

9,586,742

269,137

2b.1 SubtotalPeriod2bActivityCosts 6,987

23,884

2,804

3,839

2,653

6,178

12,090

58,435

56,712

1,723

138,847

105,508

13,829,770

455,736

Period2bAdditionalCosts 2b.2.1 ContaminatedSoilRemoval

111

2

500

5,702

1,529

7,844

7,844

106,200

8,071,193

834

2b.2 SubtotalPeriod2bAdditionalCosts

111

2

500

5,702

1,529

7,844

7,844

106,200

8,071,193

834

Period2bCollateralCosts 2b.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 171

79

213

386

222

1,072

1,072

1,130

67,806

220

2b.3.2 Processdecommissioningchemicalflushwaste 0

1

5

12

4

22

22

20

2,118

4

2b.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

527

79

606

606

2b.3.4 DecommissioningEquipmentDisposition

155

49

127

44

53

427

427

6,000

635

305,961

88

2b.3.5 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

30,040

4,506

34,546

34,546

2b.3 SubtotalPeriod2bCollateralCosts 171

527

236

267

127

441

30,040

4,864

36,673

2,126

34,546

6,000

1,785

375,885

312

Period2bPeriodDependentCosts 2b.4.1 Deconsupplies 1,864

466

2,330

2,330

2b.4.2 Insurance

1,700

170

1,870

1,870

2b.4.3 Propertytaxes

2,963

296

3,260

3,260

2b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

3,279

820

4,099

4,099

2b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

5,456

818

6,274

6,274

2b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

184

130

456

152

923

923

7,979

159,584

260

2b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

3,937

591

4,528

4,528

2b.4.8 NRCFees

1,963

196

2,160

2,160

2b.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

846

127

973

973

2b.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

2,089

313

2,402

2,402

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 10 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period2bPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 2b.4.11 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

530

80

610

610

2b.4.12 ISFSIOperatingCosts

245

37

282

282

2b.4.13 SecurityStaffCost

19,457

2,919

22,375

22,375

361,067

2b.4.14 DOCStaffCost

35,864

5,380

41,244

41,244

416,726

2b.4.15 UtilityStaffCost

61,585

9,238

70,823

70,823

773,511

2b.4 SubtotalPeriod2bPeriodDependentCosts 1,864

8,735

184

130

456

131,180

21,602

164,152

161,468

2,684

7,979

159,584

260

1,551,304

2b.0 TOTALPERIOD2bCOST 9,022

33,257

3,226

4,736

2,780

12,778

161,220

40,085

267,104

228,151

37,230

1,723

144,847

221,472

22,436,440

457,143

1,551,304

PERIOD2dDecontaminationFollowingWetFuelStorage Period2dDirectDecommissioningActivities 2d.1.1 Removespentfuelracks 608

64

142

226

744

554

2,338

2,338

10,858

615,095

1,071

DisposalofPlantSystems DrywellSystemComponents 2d.1.2.1 IAA/IAC 471

380

288

232

79

704

582

2,737

2,737

4,134

10,243

749,934

7,409

2d.1.2.2 IBA 113

189

27

25

8

76

131

570

570

438

1,113

80,901

3,998

2d.1.2.3 ICA 165

303

50

42

21

123

203

907

907

1,098

1,789

146,198

6,483

2d.1.2.4 IEA

78

16

16

10

47

37

205

205

498

687

59,174

1,354

2d.1.2.5 RC6

74

2

3

7

4

21

111

111

373

58

18,457

1,134

2d.1.2 Totals 749

1,024

384

319

125

955

974

4,529

4,529

6,541

13,891

1,054,664

20,378

ReactorBuildingSystemComponents 2d.1.3.1 RB1

228

14

18

38

29

74

400

400

2,009

419

105,353

3,451

2d.1.3.2 RBB

119

7

9

20

14

38

208

208

1,062

211

55,076

1,828

2d.1.3.3 RBC

122

8

10

23

17

40

220

220

1,203

243

62,657

1,882

2d.1.3.4 RBE

160

9

10

21

17

50

267

267

1,094

249

58,612

2,475

2d.1.3.5 RBF

135

20

18

8

53

53

288

288

441

774

61,571

2,161

2d.1.3.6 RBO

590

45

70

185

90

213

1,193

1,193

9,702

1,312

468,326

9,941

2d.1.3.7 RBS

274

37

39

37

99

108

594

594

1,923

1,445

159,975

4,412

2d.1.3.8 RBSW

135

4

7

24

5

40

214

214

1,258

73

55,258

2,080

2d.1.3.9 RC1/RC3

5

0

0

0

0

1

6

6

14

1

583

73

2d.1.3.10 RC7

90

8

9

15

18

32

172

172

797

266

47,464

1,323

2d.1.3.11 RCA

53

5

4

1

12

17

92

92

77

170

12,751

829

2d.1.3.12 RCB

79

4

4

7

9

24

128

128

374

137

22,891

1,211

2d.1.3.13 RCD

397

23

28

61

45

126

680

680

3,212

659

167,841

6,084

2d.1.3.14 RCG

76

9

10

15

22

29

161

161

761

322

49,171

1,207

2d.1.3.15 RCJ

83

4

5

9

9

25

135

135

468

129

26,309

1,281

2d.1.3.16 RCM

123

12

13

19

29

44

239

239

987

425

64,171

1,941

2d.1.3.17 RCN

272

17

17

29

36

86

456

456

1,510

517

90,705

4,175

2d.1.3.18 RCS

98

20

18

7

56

44

243

243

342

814

60,078

1,557

2d.1.3.19 RCT

63

4

4

6

9

20

107

107

306

137

20,185

977

2d.1.3.20 RD8

98

77

74

24

225

103

601

601

1,250

3,286

236,914

1,680

2d.1.3.21 RDM

54

3

2

4

5

16

83

83

186

71

11,617

806

2d.1.3.22 REC

244

11

14

30

23

74

396

396

1,571

331

82,567

3,681

2d.1.3.23 REF

113

28

24

8

75

54

302

302

422

1,086

78,740

1,775

2d.1.3.24 REH/REI

136

7

9

21

15

43

230

230

1,078

212

55,804

2,109

2d.1.3.25 REL

241

25

28

44

59

88

486

486

2,281

866

141,749

3,766

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 11 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours ReactorBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 2d.1.3.26 REM

64

3

4

8

6

20

105

105

439

85

22,669

994

2d.1.3.27 REO

138

27

27

15

77

63

346

346

773

1,121

94,897

2,207

2d.1.3.28 REQ

190

20

18

15

49

67

359

359

774

717

72,168

2,993

2d.1.3.29 RER 28

64

6

5

2

16

36

158

158

94

238

17,349

1,350

2d.1.3.30 RET 18

48

2

2

3

3

23

99

99

147

50

8,803

1,062

2d.1.3.31 REW

32

1

1

2

1

9

46

46

129

15

6,094

498

2d.1.3.32 REX

35

1

1

3

1

10

51

51

147

16

6,875

550

2d.1.3.33 REY

40

2

2

2

5

12

63

63

107

73

8,463

619

2d.1.3.34 RFB

180

10

12

25

19

56

303

303

1,295

283

68,684

2,813

2d.1.3.35 RFC 39

119

15

11

4

33

62

283

283

185

483

35,025

2,413

2d.1.3.36 RFF

126

6

7

14

12

38

202

202

728

169

39,127

1,945

2d.1.3.37 RFH

171

32

26

7

79

71

386

386

386

1,156

81,383

2,669

2d.1.3.38 RFJ

149

29

25

7

77

64

352

352

386

1,128

79,658

2,339

2d.1.3.39 RFL

96

3

4

13

3

28

147

147

702

45

31,087

1,528

2d.1.3.40 RFN

130

6

7

18

11

39

211

211

942

153

46,967

2,023

2d.1.3.41 RFQ

189

5

6

15

10

53

278

278

777

142

39,606

2,842

2d.1.3.42 RGC

100

3

4

11

5

29

152

152

580

75

27,852

1,562

2d.1.3.43 RGD

282

41

45

49

110

116

642

642

2,567

1,600

194,860

4,497

2d.1.3.44 RGI

60

1

2

7

2

17

90

90

388

23

17,054

956

2d.1.3.45 RGL

70

3

4

9

5

21

112

112

474

71

23,263

1,105

2d.1.3.46 RGP

32

1

1

4

1

9

48

48

221

14

9,781

495

2d.1.3.47 RGR

214

10

12

24

21

65

346

346

1,278

306

69,247

3,298

2d.1.3.48 RGU

96

2

3

9

4

27

142

142

473

63

22,804

1,504

2d.1.3.49 RH1

57

2

2

5

3

16

86

86

280

51

14,241

877

2d.1.3.50 RH2

42

3

4

8

6

14

77

77

441

94

23,218

659

2d.1.3.51 RH3/RH4/RH6

142

5

5

8

9

40

210

210

444

130

25,468

2,168

2d.1.3.52 RHA 14

32

2

2

1

6

17

74

74

41

93

6,930

703

2d.1.3.53 RHJ

51

1

2

5

3

14

75

75

239

37

11,796

788

2d.1.3.54 RHL

33

1

1

2

2

9

48

48

92

25

5,176

498

2d.1.3.55 RHX

61

3

3

7

5

18

97

97

349

79

18,642

934

2d.1.3.56 RHY

55

1

2

7

2

16

82

82

343

23

15,246

863

2d.1.3.57 RMCC

98

6

7

15

13

32

170

170

771

187

41,956

1,476

2d.1.3 Totals 99

7,184

650

702

980

1,571

2,556

13,742

13,742

51,322

22,900

3,382,757

113,936

MiscellaneousSystemComponents 2d.1.8.1 GAA/GCA

23

3

26

26

368

2d.1.8 Totals

23

3

26

26

368

DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 2d.1.9.1 ReactorBuilding91ftDecon 38

251

30

46

68

109

542

542

1,267

111,534

4,179

2d.1.9 Totals 38

251

30

46

68

109

542

542

1,267

111,534

4,179

2d.1.10 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

269

7

2

6

2

70

355

355

264

28

13,475

4,828

2d.1 SubtotalPeriod2dActivityCosts 1,494

8,815

1,213

1,294

1,110

3,340

4,266

21,532

21,506

26

58,127

48,944

5,177,526

144,759

Period2dAdditionalCosts 2d.2.1 LicenseTerminationSurveyPlanning

1,948

584

2,532

2,532

12,480

2d.2 SubtotalPeriod2dAdditionalCosts

1,948

584

2,532

2,532

12,480

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 12 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period2dCollateralCosts 2d.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 63

29

79

144

82

397

397

420

25,229

82

2d.3.2 Processdecommissioningchemicalflushwaste 4

116

429

1,041

338

1,927

1,927

1,718

183,018

321

2d.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

168

25

193

193

2d.3.4 DecommissioningEquipmentDisposition

155

49

127

44

53

427

427

6,000

635

305,961

88

2d.3 SubtotalPeriod2dCollateralCosts 66

168

300

557

127

1,228

498

2,945

2,945

6,000

2,773

514,208

492

Period2dPeriodDependentCosts 2d.4.1 Deconsupplies 110

28

138

138

2d.4.2 Insurance

566

57

622

622

2d.4.3 Propertytaxes

986

99

1,084

1,084

2d.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

1,051

263

1,314

1,314

2d.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

1,966

295

2,261

2,261

2d.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

71

50

175

58

355

355

3,067

61,346

100

2d.4.7 Plantenergybudget

757

114

870

870

2d.4.8 NRCFees

707

71

778

778

2d.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

305

46

351

351

2d.4.10 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

382

57

440

440

2d.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

88

13

101

101

2d.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

3,793

569

4,363

4,363

68,400

2d.4.13 DOCStaffCost

8,929

1,339

10,268

10,268

102,857

2d.4.14 UtilityStaffCost

16,312

2,447

18,759

18,759

196,457

2d.4 SubtotalPeriod2dPeriodDependentCosts 110

3,017

71

50

175

32,826

5,455

41,704

41,603

101

3,067

61,346

100

367,714

2d.0 TOTALPERIOD2dCOST 1,671

12,000

1,583

1,901

1,237

4,744

34,773

10,803

68,713

68,585

101

26

64,127

54,784

5,753,080

145,351

380,194

PERIOD2fLicenseTermination Period2fDirectDecommissioningActivities 2f.1.1 ORISEconfirmatorysurvey

161

48

210

210

2f.1.2 Terminatelicense a

2f.1 SubtotalPeriod2fActivityCosts

161

48

210

210

Period2fAdditionalCosts 2f.2.1 LicenseTerminationSurvey

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

2f.2 SubtotalPeriod2fAdditionalCosts

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

Period2fCollateralCosts 2f.3.1 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

2f.3 SubtotalPeriod2fCollateralCosts

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

Period2fPeriodDependentCosts 2f.4.1 Insurance

432

43

475

475

2f.4.2 Propertytaxes

753

75

828

828

2f.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

805

201

1,006

1,006

2f.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

8

6

20

7

41

41

355

7,097

12

2f.4.5 Plantenergybudget

289

43

332

332

2f.4.6 NRCFees

579

58

637

637

2f.4.7 SiteO&MCosts

233

35

268

268

2f.4.8 ISFSIOperatingCosts

67

10

78

78

2f.4.9 SecurityStaffCost

2,836

425

3,262

3,262

51,071

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 13 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period2fPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 2f.4.10 DOCStaffCost

5,156

773

5,929

5,929

57,357

2f.4.11 UtilityStaffCost

7,221

1,083

8,304

8,304

80,929

2f.4 SubtotalPeriod2fPeriodDependentCosts

805

8

6

20

17,567

2,755

21,160

21,083

78

355

7,097

12

189,357

2f.0 TOTALPERIOD2fCOST

805

8

6

20

27,053

5,432

33,324

33,246

78

355

7,097

118,812

195,597

PERIOD2TOTALS 12,162

69,886

18,796

12,799

7,960

34,399

301,763

91,353

549,119

492,518

54,555

2,046

401,099

337,822

918

918

40,832,640

942,880

2,867,465

PERIOD3bSiteRestoration Period3bDirectDecommissioningActivities DemolitionofRemainingSiteBuildings 3b.1.1.1 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon

1,038

156

1,193

1,193

1,911

3b.1.1.2 AdministrationBuilding

506

76

582

582

6,477

3b.1.1.3 AugmentedOffGasBuilding

338

51

388

388

3,399

3b.1.1.4 ChlorinationBuilding

32

5

36

36

407

3b.1.1.5 DieselGeneratorBuilding

137

21

157

157

1,268

3b.1.1.6 DilutionStructure

178

27

205

205

1,758

3b.1.1.7 DomesticWaterFacility

11

2

12

12

147

3b.1.1.8 FirePumpHouse

4

1

5

5

54

3b.1.1.9 FreshWaterPumpHouse

22

3

26

26

293

3b.1.1.10 HeatingBoilerHouse

41

6

48

48

546

3b.1.1.11 IntakeStructure

632

95

727

727

6,322

3b.1.1.12 LowLevelRadwasteStorage

444

67

511

511

5,435

3b.1.1.13 MachineShop

226

34

260

260

2,858

3b.1.1.14 MainGateSecurity

101

15

116

116

1,059

3b.1.1.15 MaintenanceBuilding

326

49

375

375

4,274

3b.1.1.16 MaterialsWarehouse

879

132

1,011

1,011

8,908

3b.1.1.17 MiscellaneousStructures

617

93

710

710

6,565

3b.1.1.18 NewRadwasteBuilding

745

112

857

857

8,009

3b.1.1.19 NewSamplePumpHouse

9

1

11

11

128

3b.1.1.20 OfficeBuilding

374

56

430

430

4,459

3b.1.1.21 OldRadwasteBuilding

680

102

782

782

6,852

3b.1.1.22 PlantEngineering

170

25

195

195

1,784

3b.1.1.23 PretreatmentBuilding

31

5

35

35

420

3b.1.1.24 ReactorBuilding

6,127

919

7,046

7,046

61,454

3b.1.1.25 SamplePool

15

2

18

18

180

3b.1.1.26 SecurityModifications

1,256

188

1,444

1,444

10,330

3b.1.1.27 SiteEmergencyBuilding

316

47

363

363

3,285

3b.1.1.28 TankPads&Misc.Yard

772

116

887

887

8,326

3b.1.1.29 TurbineBuilding

4,209

631

4,840

4,840

41,424

3b.1.1.30 TurbinePedestal

574

86

660

660

5,050

3b.1.1 Totals

20,808

3,121

23,929

23,929

203,381

SiteCloseoutActivities 3b.1.2 RemoveRubble

798

120

917

917

4,211

3b.1.3 Grade&landscapesite

634

95

729

729

1,304

3b.1.4 FinalreporttoNRC

187

28

215

215

1,560

3b.1 SubtotalPeriod3bActivityCosts

22,240

187

3,364

25,790

215

25,576

208,896

1,560

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 14 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period3bAdditionalCosts 3b.2.1 ConcreteCrushing

756

9

115

880

880

3,219

3b.2.2 InstallCofferdamsIntake&Dilution

975

146

1,122

1,122

8,296

3b.2 SubtotalPeriod3bAdditionalCosts

1,732

9

261

2,002

2,002

11,516

Period3bCollateralCosts 3b.3.1 Smalltoolallowance

264

40

304

304

3b.3 SubtotalPeriod3bCollateralCosts

264

40

304

304

Period3bPeriodDependentCosts 3b.4.1 Insurance

891

89

980

980

3b.4.2 Propertytaxes

1,552

155

1,708

1,708

3b.4.3 Heavyequipmentrental

4,438

666

5,104

5,104

3b.4.4 Plantenergybudget

298

45

343

343

3b.4.5 NRCISFSIFees

334

33

368

368

3b.4.6 ISFSIOperatingCosts

139

21

160

160

3b.4.7 SiteO&MCost

480

72

552

552

3b.4.8 SecurityStaffCost

5,848

877

6,725

0

5,649

1,076

105,300

3b.4.9 DOCStaffCost

10,204

1,531

11,735

11,735

110,160

3b.4.10 UtilityStaffCost

7,702

1,155

8,857

0

1,949

6,909

88,290

3b.4 SubtotalPeriod3bPeriodDependentCosts

4,438

27,449

4,644

36,531

0

10,813

25,718

303,750

3b.0 TOTALPERIOD3bCOST

28,674

27,644

8,309

64,627

215

10,813

53,600

220,412

305,310

PERIOD3cFuelStorageOperations/Shipping Period3cDirectDecommissioningActivities Period3cCollateralCosts 3c.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

9,500

1,425

10,925

10,925

3c.3 SubtotalPeriod3cCollateralCosts

9,500

1,425

10,925

10,925

Period3cPeriodDependentCosts 3c.4.1 Insurance

4,691

469

5,160

5,160

3c.4.2 Propertytaxes

8,175

818

8,993

8,993

3c.4.4 NRCISFSIFees

2,432

243

2,675

2,675

3c.4.5 ISFSIOperatingCosts

732

110

842

842

3c.4.6 SecurityStaffCost

25,904

3,886

29,790

29,790

460,697

3c.4.7 UtilityStaffCost

9,385

1,408

10,793

10,793

115,174

3c.4 SubtotalPeriod3cPeriodDependentCosts

51,319

6,933

58,252

58,252

575,871

3c.0 TOTALPERIOD3cCOST

60,819

8,358

69,177

69,177

575,871

PERIOD3dGTCCshipping Period3dDirectDecommissioningActivities NuclearSteamSupplySystemRemoval 3d.1.1.1 Vessel&InternalsGTCCDisposal

500

4,450

717

5,667

5,667

1,428

282,300

3d.1.1 Totals

500

4,450

717

5,667

5,667

1,428

282,300

3d.1 SubtotalPeriod3dActivityCosts

500

4,450

717

5,667

5,667

1,428

282,300

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 15 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period3dPeriodDependentCosts 3d.4.1 Insurance

22

2

24

24

3d.4.2 Propertytaxes

38

4

42

42

3d.4.4 ISFSIOperatingCosts

3

1

4

4

3d.4.5 SecurityStaffCost

121

18

140

140

2,160

3d.4.6 UtilityStaffCost

44

7

51

51

540

3d.4 SubtotalPeriod3dPeriodDependentCosts

229

31

261

261

2,700

3d.0 TOTALPERIOD3dCOST

500

4,450

229

749

5,928

5,667

261

1,428

282,300

2,700

PERIOD3eISFSIDecontamination Period3eDirectDecommissioningActivities Period3eAdditionalCosts 3e.2.1 ISFSILicenseTermination

2,690

1,587

1,411

1,281

6,969

6,969

19,521

2,578,520

3e.2.2 ISFSILicenseTerminationCascadingCosts

1,517

536

308

2,362

2,362

3e.2 SubtotalPeriod3eAdditionalCosts

4,207

1,587

1,947

1,589

9,330

9,330

19,521

2,578,520

Period3eCollateralCosts 3e.3.1 Smalltoolallowance

54

8

63

63

3e.3 SubtotalPeriod3eCollateralCosts

54

8

63

63

Period3ePeriodDependentCosts 3e.4.1 Insurance

652

65

717

717

3e.4.2 Propertytaxes

1,136

114

1,250

1,250

3e.4.4 SecurityStaffCost

966

145

1,111

1,111

17,193

3e.4.5 UtilityStaffCost

1,091

164

1,255

1,255

13,043

3e.4 SubtotalPeriod3ePeriodDependentCosts

3,845

487

4,333

4,333

30,236

3e.0 TOTALPERIOD3eCOST

4,262

1,587

5,792

2,084

13,726

13,726

19,521

2,578,520

30,236

PERIOD3fISFSISiteRestoration Period3fDirectDecommissioningActivities Period3fAdditionalCosts 3f.2.1 ISFSISiteRestoration

144

6

22

172

172

3f.2 SubtotalPeriod3fAdditionalCosts

144

6

22

172

172

Period3fCollateralCosts 3f.3.1 Smalltoolallowance

1

0

1

1

3f.3 SubtotalPeriod3fCollateralCosts

1

0

1

1

Period3fPeriodDependentCosts 3f.4.2 Propertytaxes

36

4

39

39

3f.4.4 SecurityStaffCost

30

5

35

35

539

3f.4.5 UtilityStaffCost

28

4

32

32

334

3f.4 SubtotalPeriod3fPeriodDependentCosts

94

12

106

106

873

3f.0 TOTALPERIOD3fCOST

144

100

35

279

279

873

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix C, Page 16 of 16 Table C Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:27:38 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD3TOTALS

33,080

500

6,037

94,585

19,535

153,737

5,882

94,255

53,600

19,521

1,428

2,860,820

220,412

914,990

TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSION 15,771

118,554

19,453

14,957

8,717

49,198

533,821

139,240

899,710

665,975

177,146

56,589

401,427

406,975

2,413

918

1,428

47,736,400

1,342,127

4,845,585

TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSIONWITH18.31%CONTINGENCY:

$899,710 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALNRCLICENSETERMINATIONCOSTIS74.02%OR:

$665,975 thousandsof2011dollars SPENTFUELMANAGEMENTCOSTIS19.69%OR:

$177,146 thousandsof2011dollars NONNUCLEARDEMOLITIONCOSTIS6.29%OR:

$56,589 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALLOWLEVELRADIOACTIVEWASTEVOLUMEBURIED(EXCLUDINGGTCC):

410,307 cubicfeet TOTALGREATERTHANCLASSCRADWASTEVOLUMEGENERATED:

1,428 cubicfeet TOTALSCRAPMETALREMOVED:

24,334 tons TOTALCRAFTLABORREQUIREMENTS:

1,342,127 manhours EndNotes:

n/aindicatesthatthisactivitynotchargedasdecommissioningexpense.

aindicatesthatthisactivityperformedbydecommissioningstaff.

0indicatesthatthisvalueislessthan0.5butisnonzero.

acellcontaining""indicatesazerovalue TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix D, Page 1 of 17 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX D DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DELAYED DECON

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 2 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD1aShutdownthroughTransition Period1aDirectDecommissioningActivities 1a.1.1 SAFSTORsitecharacterizationsurvey

434

130

564

564

1a.1.2 Preparepreliminarydecommissioningcost

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.3 NotificationofCessationofOperations a

1a.1.4 Removefuel&sourcematerial n/a 1a.1.5 NotificationofPermanentDefueling a

1a.1.6 Deactivateplantsystems&processwaste a

1a.1.7 PrepareandsubmitPSDAR

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.8 Reviewplantdwgs&specs.

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.9 Performdetailedradsurvey a

1a.1.10 Estimatebyproductinventory

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.11 Endproductdescription

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.12 Detailedbyproductinventory

179

27

206

206

1,500

1a.1.13 Definemajorworksequence

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.14 PerformSERandEA

371

56

427

427

3,100

1a.1.15 PerformSiteSpecificCostStudy

598

90

688

688

5,000

ActivitySpecifications 1a.1.16.1 PrepareplantandfacilitiesforSAFSTOR

589

88

677

677

4,920

1a.1.16.2 Plantsystems

499

75

573

573

4,167

1a.1.16.3 Plantstructuresandbuildings

373

56

429

429

3,120

1a.1.16.4 Wastemanagement

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.16.5 Facilityandsitedormancy

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.16 Total

1,939

291

2,230

2,230

16,207

DetailedWorkProcedures 1a.1.17.1 Plantsystems

142

21

163

163

1,183

1a.1.17.2 Facilitycloseout&dormancy

144

22

165

165

1,200

1a.1.17 Total

285

43

328

328

2,383

1a.1.18 Procurevacuumdryingsystem

12

2

14

14

100

1a.1.19 Drain/deenergizenoncont.systems a

1a.1.20 Drain&dryNSSS a

1a.1.21 Drain/deenergizecontaminatedsystems a

1a.1.22 Decon/securecontaminatedsystems a

1a.1 SubtotalPeriod1aActivityCosts

4,728

774

5,503

5,503

35,890

Period1aPeriodDependentCosts 1a.4.1 Insurance

2,227

223

2,450

2,450

1a.4.2 Propertytaxes

1a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

469

117

586

586

1a.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

462

69

531

531

1a.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

14

10

35

12

70

70

610

12,190

20

1a.4.6 Plantenergybudget

1,918

288

2,206

2,206

1a.4.7 NRCFees

769

77

846

846

1a.4.8 EmergencyPlanningFees

564

56

621

621

1a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

309

46

355

355

1a.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

763

114

878

878

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 3 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period1aPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 1a.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

89

13

103

103

1a.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

8,441

1,266

9,707

9,707

157,471

1a.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

33,041

4,956

37,997

37,997

423,400

1a.4 SubtotalPeriod1aPeriodDependentCosts

931

14

10

35

48,122

7,238

56,350

54,749

1,601

610

12,190

20

580,871

1a.0 TOTALPERIOD1aCOST

931

14

10

35

52,851

8,013

61,853

60,252

1,601

610

12,190

20

616,761

PERIOD1bSAFSTORLimitedDECONActivities Period1bDirectDecommissioningActivities DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 1b.1.1.1 NewRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

0

0

0

1

1b.1.1.2 OldRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

0

0

0

1

1b.1.1.3 AugmentedOffGasDecon 2

1

3

3

33

1b.1.1.4 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon 54

27

81

81

849

1b.1.1.5 TurbineBuilding0ftDecon 10

5

15

15

137

1b.1.1.6 DrywellLinerRemoval 2,063

1,031

3,094

3,094

28,819

1b.1.1.7 RB0TorusRemoval 2,765

1,383

4,148

4,148

38,634

1b.1.1.8 ReactorBuilding19ftDecon 7

3

10

10

96

1b.1.1.9 ReactorBuilding119ftDecon 429

215

644

644

5,996

1b.1.1 Totals 5,330

2,665

7,996

7,996

74,565

1b.1 SubtotalPeriod1bActivityCosts 5,330

2,665

7,996

7,996

74,565

Period1bAdditionalCosts 1b.2.1 Spentfuelpoolisolation

10,280

1,542

11,822

11,822

1b.2 SubtotalPeriod1bAdditionalCosts

10,280

1,542

11,822

11,822

Period1bCollateralCosts 1b.3.1 Deconequipment 902

135

1,037

1,037

1b.3.2 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 288

127

343

620

363

1,742

1,742

1,817

109,041

354

1b.3.4 Smalltoolallowance

100

15

115

115

1b.3 SubtotalPeriod1bCollateralCosts 1,190

100

127

343

620

514

2,894

2,894

1,817

109,041

354

Period1bPeriodDependentCosts 1b.4.1 Deconsupplies 1,056

264

1,320

1,320

1b.4.2 Insurance

418

42

459

459

1b.4.3 Propertytaxes

601

60

661

661

1b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

442

111

553

553

1b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

115

17

132

132

1b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

4

3

9

3

19

19

164

3,277

5

1b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

478

72

550

550

1b.4.8 NRCFees

192

19

211

211

1b.4.9 EmergencyPlanningFees

141

14

155

155

1b.4.10 SiteO&MCosts

77

12

89

89

1b.4.11 SpentFuelPoolO&M

190

29

219

219

1b.4.12 ISFSIOperatingCosts

22

3

26

26

1b.4.13 SecurityStaffCost

2,104

316

2,420

2,420

39,260

1b.4.14 UtilityStaffCost

8,238

1,236

9,473

9,473

105,560

1b.4 SubtotalPeriod1bPeriodDependentCosts 1,056

558

4

3

9

12,461

2,196

16,286

15,887

399

164

3,277

5

144,820

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 4 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 1b.0 TOTALPERIOD1bCOST 7,576

658

131

346

630

22,740

6,917

38,998

38,599

399

1,981

112,319

74,925

144,820

PERIOD1cPreparationsforSAFSTORDormancy Period1cDirectDecommissioningActivities 1c.1.1 Preparesupportequipmentforstorage

489

73

562

562

3,000

1c.1.2 Installcontainmentpressureequal.lines

51

8

59

59

700

1c.1.3 Interimsurveypriortodormancy

733

220

953

953

12,166

1c.1.4 Securebuildingaccesses a

1c.1.5 Prepare&submitinterimreport

70

10

80

80

583

1c.1 SubtotalPeriod1cActivityCosts

540

803

311

1,654

1,654

15,866

583

Period1cCollateralCosts 1c.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 238

105

284

513

300

1,440

1,440

1,503

90,169

293

1c.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

5

1

6

6

1c.3 SubtotalPeriod1cCollateralCosts 238

5

105

284

513

301

1,446

1,446

1,503

90,169

293

Period1cPeriodDependentCosts 1c.4.1 Insurance

418

42

459

459

1c.4.2 Propertytaxes

601

60

661

661

1c.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

187

47

234

234

1c.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

115

17

132

132

1c.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

4

2

9

3

18

18

152

3,039

5

1c.4.6 Plantenergybudget

478

72

550

550

1c.4.7 NRCFees

192

19

211

211

1c.4.8 EmergencyPlanningFees

141

14

155

155

1c.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

77

12

89

89

1c.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

190

29

219

219

1c.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

22

3

26

26

1c.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

2,104

316

2,420

2,420

39,260

1c.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

8,238

1,236

9,473

9,473

105,560

1c.4 SubtotalPeriod1cPeriodDependentCosts

302

4

2

9

12,461

1,869

14,646

14,247

399

152

3,039

5

144,820

1c.0 TOTALPERIOD1cCOST 238

847

109

286

522

13,263

2,481

17,746

17,346

399

1,655

93,209

16,164

145,403

PERIOD1TOTALS 7,813

2,435

254

642

1,186

88,855

17,411

118,597

116,197

2,400

4,246

217,718

91,109

906,985

PERIOD2aSAFSTORDormancywithWetSpentFuelStorage Period2aDirectDecommissioningActivities 2a.1.1 QuarterlyInspection a

2a.1.2 Semiannualenvironmentalsurvey a

2a.1.3 Preparereports a

2a.1.4 Bituminousroofreplacement

722

108

830

830

2a.1.5 Maintenancesupplies

1,992

498

2,490

2,490

2a.1 SubtotalPeriod2aActivityCosts

2,714

606

3,321

3,321

Period2aCollateralCosts 2a.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

12,250

1,838

14,088

14,088

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 5 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 2a.3 SubtotalPeriod2aCollateralCosts

12,250

1,838

14,088

14,088

Period2aPeriodDependentCosts 2a.4.1 Insurance

9,568

957

10,524

10,524

2a.4.2 Propertytaxes

14,904

1,490

16,395

16,395

2a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

2,778

694

3,472

3,472

2a.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

78

55

194

65

393

393

3,398

67,952

111

2a.4.5 Plantenergybudget

5,665

850

6,515

6,515

2a.4.6 NRCISFSIFees

420

42

462

462

2a.4.7 NRCFees

3,254

325

3,580

3,580

2a.4.8 SiteO&MCosts

4,565

685

5,249

5,249

2a.4.9 SpentFuelPoolO&M

11,270

1,690

12,960

12,960

2a.4.10 ISFSIOperatingCosts

1,321

198

1,519

1,519

2a.4.11 SecurityStaffCost

88,917

13,338

102,255

102,255

1,640,100

2a.4.12 UtilityStaffCost

94,837

14,226

109,063

109,063

1,216,600

2a.4 SubtotalPeriod2aPeriodDependentCosts

2,778

78

55

194

234,720

34,560

272,386

7,444

264,941

3,398

67,952

111

2,856,700

2a.0 TOTALPERIOD2aCOST

2,778

78

55

194

249,684

37,004

289,794

10,765

279,029

3,398

67,952

111

2,856,700

PERIOD2bSAFSTORDormancywithDrySpentFuelStorage Period2bDirectDecommissioningActivities 2b.1.1 QuarterlyInspection a

2b.1.2 Semiannualenvironmentalsurvey a

2b.1.3 Preparereports a

2b.1.4 Bituminousroofreplacement

37

5

42

42

2b.1.5 Maintenancesupplies

101

25

126

126

2b.1 SubtotalPeriod2bActivityCosts

137

31

168

168

Period2bCollateralCosts 2b.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

3,375

506

3,881

3,881

2b.3 SubtotalPeriod2bCollateralCosts

3,375

506

3,881

3,881

Period2bPeriodDependentCosts 2b.4.1 Insurance

429

43

472

472

2b.4.2 Propertytaxes

747

75

822

822

2b.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

68

17

85

85

2b.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

2

1

5

2

10

10

83

1,653

3

2b.4.5 Plantenergybudget

143

22

165

165

2b.4.6 NRCISFSIFees

139

14

153

153

2b.4.7 NRCFees

165

16

181

181

2b.4.8 SiteO&MCosts

231

35

266

266

2b.4.9 ISFSIOperatingCosts

67

10

77

77

2b.4.10 SecurityStaffCost

2,368

355

2,724

2,724

42,120

2b.4.11 UtilityStaffCost

1,975

296

2,272

2,272

24,960

2b.4 SubtotalPeriod2bPeriodDependentCosts

68

2

1

5

6,266

884

7,227

276

6,950

83

1,653

3

67,080

2b.0 TOTALPERIOD2bCOST

68

2

1

5

9,778

1,421

11,276

444

10,832

83

1,653

3

67,080

PERIOD2TOTALS

2,846

80

57

199

259,463

38,425

301,070

11,209

289,860

3,480

69,605

114

2,923,780

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 6 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD3aReactivateSiteFollowingSAFSTORDormancy Period3aDirectDecommissioningActivities 3a.1.1 Preparepreliminarydecommissioningcost

156

23

179

179

1,300

3a.1.2 Reviewplantdwgs&specs.

550

83

633

633

4,600

3a.1.3 Performdetailedradsurvey a

3a.1.4 Endproductdescription

120

18

138

138

1,000

3a.1.5 Detailedbyproductinventory

156

23

179

179

1,300

3a.1.6 Definemajorworksequence

897

135

1,032

1,032

7,500

3a.1.7 PerformSERandEA

371

56

427

427

3,100

3a.1.8 PerformSiteSpecificCostStudy

598

90

688

688

5,000

3a.1.9 Prepare/submitLicenseTerminationPlan

490

74

564

564

4,096

3a.1.10 ReceiveNRCapprovalofterminationplan a

ActivitySpecifications 3a.1.11.1 Reactivateplant&temporaryfacilities

882

132

1,014

913

101

7,370

3a.1.11.2 Plantsystems

499

75

573

516

57

4,167

3a.1.11.3 Reactorinternals

850

127

977

977

7,100

3a.1.11.4 Reactorvessel

778

117

894

894

6,500

3a.1.11.5 Sacrificialshield

60

9

69

69

500

3a.1.11.6 Moistureseparators/reheaters

120

18

138

138

1,000

3a.1.11.7 Reinforcedconcrete

191

29

220

110

110

1,600

3a.1.11.8 MainTurbine

250

37

287

287

2,088

3a.1.11.9 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

3a.1.11.10 Pressuresuppressionstructure

239

36

275

275

2,000

3a.1.11.11 Drywell

191

29

220

220

1,600

3a.1.11.12 Plantstructures&buildings

373

56

429

215

215

3,120

3a.1.11.13 Wastemanagement

550

83

633

633

4,600

3a.1.11.14 Facility&sitecloseout

108

16

124

62

62

900

3a.1.11 Total

5,340

801

6,141

5,596

545

44,633

Planning&SitePreparations 3a.1.12 Preparedismantlingsequence

287

43

330

330

2,400

3a.1.13 Plantprep.&temp.svces

2,800

420

3,220

3,220

3a.1.14 Designwatercleanupsystem

168

25

193

193

1,400

3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont.CntrlEnvlps/tooling/etc.

2,200

330

2,530

2,530

3a.1.16 Procurecasks/liners&containers

147

22

169

169

1,230

3a.1 SubtotalPeriod3aActivityCosts

14,280

2,142

16,422

15,876

545

77,559

Period3aPeriodDependentCosts 3a.4.1 Insurance

573

57

631

631

3a.4.2 Propertytaxes

999

100

1,099

1,099

3a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

410

102

512

512

3a.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

462

69

531

531

3a.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

12

8

29

10

59

59

514

10,287

17

3a.4.6 Plantenergybudget

1,918

288

2,206

2,206

3a.4.7 NRCFees

272

27

299

299

3a.4.8 SiteO&MCosts

309

46

355

355

3a.4.9 SecurityStaffCost

3,629

544

4,173

4,173

65,179

3a.4.10 UtilityStaffCost

20,498

3,075

23,573

23,573

258,629

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 7 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 3a.4 SubtotalPeriod3aPeriodDependentCosts

872

12

8

29

28,199

4,319

33,440

33,440

514

10,287

17

323,807

3a.0 TOTALPERIOD3aCOST

872

12

8

29

42,479

6,461

49,861

49,316

545

514

10,287

17

401,366

PERIOD3bDecommissioningPreparations Period3bDirectDecommissioningActivities DetailedWorkProcedures 3b.1.1.1 Plantsystems

566

85

651

586

65

4,733

3b.1.1.2 Reactorinternals

479

72

550

550

4,000

3b.1.1.3 Remainingbuildings

162

24

186

46

139

1,350

3b.1.1.4 CRDhousings&NIs

120

18

138

138

1,000

3b.1.1.5 Incoreinstrumentation

120

18

138

138

1,000

3b.1.1.6 Removalprimarycontainment

239

36

275

275

2,000

3b.1.1.7 Reactorvessel

434

65

499

499

3,630

3b.1.1.8 Facilitycloseout

144

22

165

83

83

1,200

3b.1.1.9 Sacrificialshield

144

22

165

165

1,200

3b.1.1.10 Reinforcedconcrete

120

18

138

69

69

1,000

3b.1.1.11 MainTurbine

249

37

286

286

2,080

3b.1.1.12 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

3b.1.1.13 Moistureseparators&reheaters

239

36

275

275

2,000

3b.1.1.14 Radwastebuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

3b.1.1.15 Reactorbuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

3b.1.1 Total

3,917

588

4,505

4,074

431

32,741

3b.1 SubtotalPeriod3bActivityCosts

3,917

588

4,505

4,074

431

32,741

Period3bAdditionalCosts 3b.2.1 SiteCharacterization

4,986

1,496

6,482

6,482

27,140

9,952

3b.2.2 DispositionofLiquidRCRAWaste(notLead)

17

529

135

680

680

2,019

115,076

3b.2.3 DispositionofPCBSoilRCRAWaste(notLead)

1,362

1,450

567

3,378

3,378

27,000

3,240,000

3b.2.4 DispositionofLeadInventory

26

756

117

899

899

328

232,673

3b.2.5 AsbestosRemediation

12,217

2

279

1,030

3,354

16,883

16,883

19,193

249,515

150,230

3b.2 SubtotalPeriod3bAdditionalCosts

12,217

2

1,684

756

3,009

4,986

5,669

28,323

28,323

328

48,212

3,837,264

177,370

9,952

Period3bCollateralCosts 3b.3.1 Deconequipment 902

135

1,037

1,037

3b.3.2 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

3b.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

184

28

211

211

3b.3.4 Pipecuttingequipment

1,100

165

1,265

1,265

3b.3 SubtotalPeriod3bCollateralCosts 902

1,284

1,124

496

3,806

3,806

Period3bPeriodDependentCosts 3b.4.1 Deconsupplies 28

7

35

35

3b.4.2 Insurance

287

29

316

316

3b.4.3 Propertytaxes

501

50

551

551

3b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

879

220

1,099

1,099

3b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

232

35

266

266

3b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

7

5

17

6

34

34

292

5,834

10

3b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

962

144

1,106

1,106

3b.4.8 NRCFees

136

14

150

150

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 8 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period3bPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 3b.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

155

23

178

178

3b.4.10 SecurityStaffCost

1,819

273

2,092

2,092

32,679

3b.4.11 DOCStaffCost

5,076

761

5,838

5,838

58,560

3b.4.12 UtilityStaffCost

10,277

1,542

11,819

11,819

129,669

3b.4 SubtotalPeriod3bPeriodDependentCosts 28

1,111

7

5

17

19,214

3,103

23,484

23,484

292

5,834

10

220,907

3b.0 TOTALPERIOD3bCOST 930

14,611

8

1,689

756

3,025

29,242

9,855

60,117

59,686

431

328

48,504

3,843,098

177,380

263,600

PERIOD3TOTALS 930

15,483

20

1,698

756

3,055

71,721

16,317

109,979

109,002

976

328

49,018

3,853,385

177,396

664,966

PERIOD4aLargeComponentRemoval Period4aDirectDecommissioningActivities NuclearSteamSupplySystemRemoval 4a.1.1.2 RecirculationPumps&Motors 10

108

41

136

8

216

112

632

632

107

1,053

196,350

2,156

4a.1.1.3 CRDMs&NIsRemoval 40

179

523

141

137

172

1,190

1,190

5,179

112,850

3,338

4a.1.1.4 ReactorVesselInternals 114

2,810

5,441

1,228

4,927

213

6,327

21,060

21,060

1,502

1,002

470

298,460

22,925

1,049

4a.1.1.5 Vessel&InternalsGTCCDisposal

4,450

667

5,117

5,117

1,428

282,300

4a.1.1.6 ReactorVessel 87

6,370

1,859

1,718

2,333

213

6,913

19,494

19,494

14,674

1,573,112

22,925

1,049

4a.1.1 Totals 251

9,467

7,864

3,222

8

12,062

427

14,192

47,492

47,492

107

22,409

1,002

470

1,428

2,463,072

51,345

2,098

RemovalofMajorEquipment 4a.1.2 MainTurbine/Generator

326

1,861

391

1,707

582

4,867

4,867

80,711

3,632,000

4,957

4a.1.3 MainCondensers

1,000

1,291

271

1,184

597

4,344

4,344

56,000

2,520,000

15,180

NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.7.1 7EB

162

9

9

7

23

49

259

259

362

334

33,679

2,492

4a.1.7.2 N2G

11

0

0

1

3

16

16

49

2,007

178

4a.1.7.3 N2P

24

1

1

6

7

40

40

341

13,830

357

4a.1.7.4 N3A

68

1

2

8

18

96

96

398

16,151

1,000

4a.1.7.5 N3D

81

1

2

10

22

115

115

501

20,362

1,263

4a.1.7.6 N3I

17

0

0

1

0

4

23

23

27

5

1,390

273

4a.1.7.7 N3N

101

1

2

9

27

139

139

447

18,140

1,529

4a.1.7.8 N3P

26

0

1

3

7

37

37

179

7,267

383

4a.1.7.9 N3Q

17

0

0

2

5

24

24

80

3,260

271

4a.1.7.10 N3R

17

0

0

2

5

24

24

97

3,934

261

4a.1.7.11 N3S

25

0

1

4

7

37

37

187

7,583

400

4a.1.7.12 N3T

16

0

0

1

4

21

21

58

2,357

243

4a.1.7.13 N3U

113

14

14

12

38

43

234

234

610

548

55,829

1,727

4a.1.7.14 N3W

117

16

15

12

41

45

247

247

643

604

60,369

1,792

4a.1.7.15 N3Y

208

5

13

58

63

348

348

3,054

124,028

3,179

4a.1.7.16 N51

28

0

1

5

8

42

42

239

9,707

433

4a.1.7.17 N52

23

1

1

2

3

7

38

38

121

43

7,290

353

4a.1.7.18 N53

35

2

3

5

5

11

61

61

248

75

14,268

541

4a.1.7.19 N54

17

1

1

1

2

5

26

26

46

28

3,435

260

4a.1.7.20 N55

73

1

2

8

20

104

104

414

16,809

1,137

4a.1.7.21 N56

97

1

3

14

27

143

143

734

29,828

1,389

4a.1.7.22 N5A

42

1

2

6

2

12

64

64

290

26

13,205

663

4a.1.7.23 N5B

39

1

1

6

11

58

58

307

12,485

621

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 9 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 4a.1.7.24 N5C

18

0

0

2

5

25

25

106

4,294

267

4a.1.7.25 N5D

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

152

6,190

426

4a.1.7.26 N5E

19

0

0

2

5

26

26

110

4,453

278

4a.1.7.27 N5F

27

2

1

2

3

8

43

43

91

45

6,294

408

4a.1.7.28 N5G

13

0

0

1

3

18

18

40

1,645

205

4a.1.7.29 N5H

11

1

1

0

2

3

18

18

5

26

1,667

172

4a.1.7.30 N5I

15

0

0

1

4

21

21

51

2,090

238

4a.1.7.31 N5J

12

0

1

3

3

19

19

131

5,328

187

4a.1.7.32 N5K

15

0

0

1

4

21

21

75

3,050

224

4a.1.7.33 N5N

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

143

5,803

433

4a.1.7.34 N5O

72

1

3

13

21

110

110

670

27,221

1,105

4a.1.7.35 N5P

26

2

2

3

4

9

46

46

183

62

10,822

420

4a.1.7.36 N5Q

26

2

2

3

4

8

46

46

182

61

10,719

414

4a.1.7.37 N5S

64

4

10

42

24

143

143

2,195

89,151

1,024

4a.1.7.38 N5T

59

2

3

12

3

18

97

97

606

40

26,812

930

4a.1.7.39 N5U

60

2

3

12

3

18

98

98

607

40

26,871

942

4a.1.7.40 N5Y

23

1

1

3

1

7

36

36

153

19

7,306

358

4a.1.7.41 N5Z

23

1

1

3

1

7

36

36

153

19

7,306

358

4a.1.7.42 PPA

75

1

3

11

21

110

110

572

23,240

1,139

4a.1.7 Totals

1,972

76

109

299

135

596

3,187

3,187

15,660

1,977

747,476

30,271

OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.8.1 7BA

83

1

2

9

22

117

117

480

19,481

1,272

4a.1.8.2 7DA

48

5

5

2

14

17

92

92

122

206

16,640

738

4a.1.8.3 7FA

22

1

2

4

3

7

39

39

206

43

10,810

355

4a.1.8.4 PBA

147

12

12

17

26

49

263

263

893

388

57,934

2,324

4a.1.8.5 PDA

52

1

2

7

14

75

75

373

15,150

808

4a.1.8.6 PMA

12

0

0

1

3

17

17

54

2,174

190

4a.1.8.7 PRA

82

1

4

16

24

128

128

855

34,703

1,292

4a.1.8.8 PTK/PTP

13

0

0

1

3

17

17

30

1,199

202

4a.1.8 Totals

460

21

26

57

43

141

749

749

3,011

637

158,091

7,180

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.9.1 7CA

260

21

22

33

46

87

468

468

1,755

663

108,906

4,017

4a.1.9.2 TB2

961

19

52

227

284

1,544

1,544

11,906

483,529

14,570

4a.1.9.3 TB23

5

0

0

1

1

8

8

42

1,699

83

4a.1.9.4 TB38

16

0

1

2

5

24

24

124

5,034

229

4a.1.9.5 TC2

1,562

70

188

820

549

3,190

3,190

42,978

1,745,363

23,871

4a.1.9.6 TE2

186

12

20

60

22

65

365

365

3,126

317

144,922

2,822

4a.1.9.7 TEE

320

7

18

79

95

519

519

4,115

167,126

4,871

4a.1.9.8 TEG

26

0

1

3

7

36

36

139

5,640

380

4a.1.9.9 TP2

170

4

12

51

52

289

289

2,659

107,977

2,613

4a.1.9.10 TP3

113

9

10

16

20

38

205

205

859

292

51,008

1,793

4a.1.9.11 TPE

102

10

10

12

23

36

193

193

647

335

45,003

1,572

4a.1.9 Totals

3,722

153

332

1,305

110

1,219

6,840

6,840

68,349

1,608

2,866,205

56,820

4a.1.12 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

940

27

7

22

8

244

1,249

1,249

1,057

112

53,901

16,869

4a.1 SubtotalPeriod4aActivityCosts 251

17,887

11,294

4,359

4,583

12,357

427

17,571

68,729

68,729

224,895

26,743

1,002

470

1,428

12,440,740

182,622

2,098

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 10 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period4aCollateralCosts 4a.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 24

15

39

71

37

185

185

207

12,411

40

4a.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

223

33

257

231

26

4a.3 SubtotalPeriod4aCollateralCosts 24

223

15

39

71

70

442

416

26

207

12,411

40

Period4aPeriodDependentCosts 4a.4.1 Deconsupplies 62

15

77

77

4a.4.2 Insurance

643

64

707

707

4a.4.3 Propertytaxes

1,120

112

1,232

1,109

123

4a.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

1,311

328

1,639

1,639

4a.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

2,252

338

2,590

2,590

4a.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

85

60

212

71

428

428

3,704

74,073

121

4a.4.7 Plantenergybudget

2,042

306

2,348

2,348

4a.4.8 NRCFees

804

80

884

884

4a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

346

52

398

398

4a.4.10 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

434

65

499

499

4a.4.11 SecurityStaffCost

4,066

610

4,676

4,676

73,036

4a.4.12 DOCStaffCost

13,729

2,059

15,789

15,789

161,263

4a.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

23,178

3,477

26,654

26,654

292,143

4a.4 SubtotalPeriod4aPeriodDependentCosts 62

3,563

85

60

212

46,362

7,578

57,922

57,799

123

3,704

74,073

121

526,441

4a.0 TOTALPERIOD4aCOST 336

21,674

11,394

4,459

4,583

12,639

46,789

25,219

127,092

126,943

149

224,895

30,653

1,002

470

1,428

12,527,230

182,783

528,539

PERIOD4bSiteDecontamination Period4bDirectDecommissioningActivities 4b.1.1 Removespentfuelracks 545

64

142

226

744

523

2,243

2,243

10,858

615,095

1,071

DisposalofPlantSystems DrywellSystemComponents 4b.1.2.1 IAA/IAC

329

218

191

136

527

285

1,685

1,685

7,111

7,660

723,932

5,700

4b.1.2.2 IBA

164

19

19

17

50

61

330

330

880

734

77,321

2,588

4b.1.2.3 ICA

263

36

32

35

79

99

543

543

1,841

1,148

140,037

4,149

4b.1.2.4 IEA

70

9

11

18

22

28

157

157

926

320

55,719

1,176

4b.1.2.5 RC6

65

1

2

8

18

95

95

440

17,889

989

4b.1.2 Totals

890

282

255

214

678

491

2,809

2,809

11,199

9,861

1,014,897

14,602

ReactorBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.3.1 RB1

202

4

11

48

60

324

324

2,495

101,308

2,991

4b.1.3.2 RBB

106

2

6

25

31

170

170

1,306

53,019

1,597

4b.1.3.3 RBC

108

2

6

28

33

178

178

1,485

60,294

1,647

4b.1.3.4 RBE

142

2

6

26

41

217

217

1,381

56,063

2,156

4b.1.3.5 RBF

121

14

14

14

35

45

244

244

740

516

59,235

1,909

4b.1.3.6 RBO

526

18

49

214

173

981

981

11,229

456,005

8,678

4b.1.3.7 RBS

247

22

27

53

50

88

486

486

2,757

727

153,183

3,897

4b.1.3.8 RBSW

135

2

6

26

39

207

207

1,343

54,558

2,077

4b.1.3.9 RC1/RC3

4

0

0

0

1

6

6

14

577

63

4b.1.3.10 RC7

90

2

5

21

27

145

145

1,106

44,917

1,311

4b.1.3.11 RCA

47

3

3

3

8

15

79

79

147

109

12,175

725

4b.1.3.12 RCB

69

2

3

10

2

20

105

105

501

28

21,917

1,051

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 11 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours ReactorBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 4b.1.3.13 RCD

352

7

17

76

103

555

555

3,974

161,384

5,318

4b.1.3.14 RCG

67

2

5

22

21

116

116

1,136

46,136

1,041

4b.1.3.15 RCJ

74

1

3

12

21

110

110

617

25,044

1,121

4b.1.3.16 RCM

109

2

6

28

33

179

179

1,481

60,136

1,694

4b.1.3.17 RCN

243

3

9

40

69

365

365

2,107

85,581

3,666

4b.1.3.18 RCS

87

15

14

12

38

37

204

204

636

561

57,657

1,365

4b.1.3.19 RCT

57

1

2

9

16

84

84

464

18,858

858

4b.1.3.20 RD8

87

66

66

36

189

91

535

535

1,861

2,761

231,971

1,484

4b.1.3.21 RDM

48

0

1

5

13

67

67

268

10,870

701

4b.1.3.22 REC

216

3

9

37

61

326

326

1,953

79,329

3,190

4b.1.3.23 REF

100

23

21

13

60

47

264

264

667

875

76,709

1,550

4b.1.3.24 REH/REI

121

2

6

25

35

189

189

1,325

53,806

1,846

4b.1.3.25 REL

215

5

14

63

66

364

364

3,286

133,445

3,285

4b.1.3.26 REM

57

1

2

10

16

87

87

538

21,846

868

4b.1.3.27 REO

122

21

22

21

57

53

296

296

1,115

827

92,099

1,930

4b.1.3.28 REQ

169

9

11

25

17

53

284

284

1,311

254

67,684

2,610

4b.1.3.29 RER

56

5

4

3

11

19

98

98

177

167

16,663

881

4b.1.3.30 RET

32

1

1

4

1

9

48

48

185

18

8,515

500

4b.1.3.31 REW

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

146

5,936

432

4b.1.3.32 REX

31

0

1

3

8

43

43

165

6,710

477

4b.1.3.33 REY

36

0

1

4

10

50

50

192

7,781

543

4b.1.3.34 RFB

159

3

7

31

46

246

246

1,622

65,859

2,449

4b.1.3.35 RFC

104

12

9

6

24

35

190

190

337

351

33,707

1,649

4b.1.3.36 RFF

111

2

4

18

31

166

166

923

37,469

1,696

4b.1.3.37 RFH

152

25

22

13

61

61

335

335

692

893

78,810

2,337

4b.1.3.38 RFJ

133

23

21

13

59

56

305

305

690

866

77,154

2,052

4b.1.3.39 RFL

85

1

3

14

24

128

128

754

30,625

1,337

4b.1.3.40 RFN

115

2

5

21

33

176

176

1,118

45,418

1,768

4b.1.3.41 RFQ

167

2

4

18

45

236

236

942

38,243

2,456

4b.1.3.42 RGC

89

1

3

13

25

130

130

667

27,107

1,368

4b.1.3.43 RGD

251

7

19

84

79

441

441

4,427

179,773

3,921

4b.1.3.44 RGI

53

1

2

8

15

78

78

414

16,826

835

4b.1.3.45 RGL

62

1

2

11

18

94

94

555

22,545

967

4b.1.3.46 RGP

29

0

1

5

8

43

43

238

9,661

437

4b.1.3.47 RGR

190

3

7

31

54

284

284

1,633

66,314

2,876

4b.1.3.48 RGU

85

1

2

10

23

121

121

547

22,199

1,312

4b.1.3.49 RH1

50

1

1

6

14

72

72

339

13,754

762

4b.1.3.50 RH2

37

1

2

10

11

62

62

550

22,340

572

4b.1.3.51 RH3/RH4/RH6

127

1

3

11

34

176

176

592

24,061

1,896

4b.1.3.52 RHA

21

1

2

2

4

7

36

36

83

57

6,596

326

4b.1.3.53 RHJ

45

0

1

5

12

64

64

282

11,443

687

4b.1.3.54 RHL

29

0

1

2

8

40

40

121

4,913

431

4b.1.3.55 RHX

54

1

2

8

15

80

80

440

17,877

814

4b.1.3.56 RHY

49

1

2

7

13

71

71

369

14,998

750

4b.1.3.57 RMCC

98

2

4

19

28

151

151

989

40,165

1,468

4b.1.3 Totals

6,397

332

482

1,287

618

2,053

11,170

11,170

67,430

9,010

3,249,269

98,630

NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.4.1 N38

173

2

6

27

48

256

256

1,392

56,536

2,566

4b.1.4.2 N48

88

1

2

10

24

125

125

530

21,506

1,308

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 12 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 4b.1.4.3 N4A

29

2

2

3

4

9

50

50

183

63

10,949

470

4b.1.4.4 N4B

28

2

2

3

4

9

46

46

162

53

9,549

442

4b.1.4.5 N4D

91

1

2

9

24

127

127

459

18,650

1,350

4b.1.4.6 N4E

7

0

0

0

2

9

9

17

687

107

4b.1.4.7 N4F

19

0

0

2

5

27

27

98

3,986

289

4b.1.4.8 N4H

22

1

1

4

2

7

38

38

217

23

10,137

364

4b.1.4.9 N4K

24

0

1

3

7

35

35

176

7,138

364

4b.1.4.10 N4L

35

0

1

3

10

49

49

177

7,195

553

4b.1.4.11 N5R

77

2

4

20

23

125

125

1,029

41,782

1,188

4b.1.4.12 N5V

59

4

5

9

10

20

107

107

482

146

27,568

934

4b.1.4.13 N5W

9

0

0

0

2

12

12

10

401

148

4b.1.4.14 N5X

74

1

4

16

22

116

116

842

34,176

1,155

4b.1.4 Totals

734

16

31

110

19

211

1,122

1,122

5,774

286

250,260

11,236

OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.5.1 ORWPreD&DDesludgeandDecon

203

30

234

234

2,839

4b.1.5.2 PRD

15

0

1

3

4

23

23

151

6,112

245

4b.1.5.3 PSB

139

2

5

23

39

209

209

1,198

48,634

2,135

4b.1.5.4 PTA

39

1

2

7

11

59

59

371

15,084

601

4b.1.5.5 PUA

208

2

6

27

57

300

300

1,389

56,392

3,154

4b.1.5.6 PUU

141

5

10

35

5

44

239

239

1,825

83

78,582

2,225

4b.1.5.7 PVA

9

0

0

0

2

12

12

13

519

148

4b.1.5.8 UAB

304

4

10

45

85

448

448

2,367

96,117

4,649

4b.1.5.9 UAS

208

4

10

43

61

326

326

2,277

92,465

3,222

4b.1.5 Totals

1,268

18

44

183

5

334

1,851

1,851

9,590

83

393,904

19,219

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.6.1 TD2

60

1

2

7

17

87

87

390

15,850

875

4b.1.6.2 TF2

324

16

42

184

117

683

683

9,646

391,743

4,891

4b.1.6.3 TFG

23

0

1

3

6

34

34

150

6,106

361

4b.1.6.4 TG2

236

12

33

144

87

513

513

7,564

307,179

3,660

4b.1.6.5 TH2

459

21

56

243

162

940

940

12,740

517,385

7,040

4b.1.6.6 TKA

24

0

0

1

6

32

32

74

2,996

348

4b.1.6.7 TL2

100

7

6

10

14

32

168

168

523

201

32,662

1,480

4b.1.6.8 TMA

61

1

4

17

18

102

102

895

36,367

921

4b.1.6.9 TN2

320

7

19

85

96

528

528

4,447

180,585

4,873

4b.1.6.10 TO2

170

26

196

196

2,826

4b.1.6.11 TOA

87

2

4

19

26

138

138

1,014

41,172

1,303

4b.1.6.12 TOCR

74

3

7

32

25

141

141

1,692

68,697

1,058

4b.1.6.13 TOR

65

2

4

18

20

107

107

931

37,795

994

4b.1.6.14 TOV

19

0

0

2

5

27

27

98

3,978

292

4b.1.6.15 TOW

103

4

11

49

35

202

202

2,557

103,857

1,547

4b.1.6.16 TOX/TOY

28

0

1

2

8

39

39

124

5,052

423

4b.1.6.17 TS2

201

6

17

74

64

362

362

3,875

157,362

2,995

4b.1.6.18 TTA

60

1

4

17

18

101

101

899

36,508

957

4b.1.6.19 TU2

185

3

9

40

54

292

292

2,096

85,139

2,856

4b.1.6 Totals

2,599

87

221

949

14

820

4,691

4,495

196

49,717

201

2,030,434

39,701

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 13 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours AugmentedOffgasSystemComponents 4b.1.7.1 AY8

143

3

7

30

42

224

224

1,596

64,813

2,154

4b.1.7.2 AYA

30

1

2

10

9

53

53

512

20,775

459

4b.1.7.3 AYB

29

0

1

5

8

43

43

267

10,862

441

4b.1.7.4 AYC

73

2

4

19

22

120

120

1,012

41,078

1,127

4b.1.7.5 AYE

25

0

0

2

7

35

35

103

4,199

375

4b.1.7.6 AZ8

54

1

3

12

16

85

85

611

24,796

824

4b.1.7.7 AZA

12

0

0

1

3

17

17

40

1,638

188

4b.1.7.8 AZC

103

2

5

22

30

162

162

1,145

46,509

1,555

4b.1.7.9 AZD

17

0

0

1

5

24

24

75

3,063

267

4b.1.7.10 AZE

16

0

0

1

4

23

23

70

2,856

256

4b.1.7.11 AZF

15

0

0

2

4

22

22

90

3,672

239

4b.1.7.12 AZI

30

1

1

7

9

47

47

343

13,938

461

4b.1.7 Totals

547

10

26

112

158

853

853

5,865

238,198

8,345

MiscellaneousSystemComponents 4b.1.8.1 BAA

262

5

14

62

77

421

421

3,241

131,602

3,979

4b.1.8.2 BBA

88

4

10

42

30

173

173

2,183

88,656

1,368

4b.1.8.3 BDA

11

0

0

1

3

14

14

27

1,083

167

4b.1.8.4 CAA

615

17

45

196

192

1,064

1,064

10,252

416,330

9,611

4b.1.8.5 DAA

64

1

2

7

17

91

91

376

15,277

1,005

4b.1.8.6 DAC

152

2

5

23

42

225

225

1,230

49,940

2,323

4b.1.8.7 DGB

82

12

94

94

1,336

4b.1.8.8 DOT

14

2

16

16

223

4b.1.8.9 DPH

95

14

109

109

1,527

4b.1.8.10 DWF

22

3

25

25

360

4b.1.8.11 FWP

127

19

146

146

2,018

4b.1.8.12 GAA/GCA

23

3

26

26

368

4b.1.8.13 INTAKESTRUCTURE

199

30

229

229

3,218

4b.1.8.14 MAA

127

2

6

28

37

200

200

1,469

59,650

1,920

4b.1.8.15 MBA

51

1

2

8

14

76

76

413

16,776

764

4b.1.8.16 MBS/MBT

38

0

0

2

10

50

50

108

4,371

575

4b.1.8.17 MS

40

6

46

46

676

4b.1.8.18 NMBROOF

20

3

22

22

312

4b.1.8.19 OB

292

44

336

336

4,806

4b.1.8.20 PTB

43

6

49

49

688

4b.1.8.21 RSFROOF

29

0

1

3

8

42

42

175

7,097

451

4b.1.8.22 UYARD

1,807

10

27

118

474

2,435

2,435

6,162

250,262

21,730

4b.1.8.23 WAA

166

2

5

23

46

242

242

1,197

48,603

2,479

4b.1.8.24 WHS

19

3

22

22

318

4b.1.8.25 YARDAREAS

408

61

470

470

6,583

4b.1.8.26 YDA/YFA/YLA

2

0

0

0

1

3

3

19

783

30

4b.1.8 Totals

4,796

44

117

513

1,159

6,629

5,037

1,592

26,851

1,090,429

68,833

4b.1.9 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

1,410

41

11

34

11

366

1,873

1,873

1,586

168

80,852

25,304

DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 4b.1.10.1 NewRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

146

103

156

0

233

129

767

767

6

4,340

382,187

2,226

4b.1.10.2 OldRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

4

11

17

0

25

11

67

67

6

461

40,787

66

4b.1.10.3 TurbineBuildingSystemsRemoval

419

249

376

561

326

1,931

1,931

10,447

919,350

5,562

4b.1.10.4 AugmentedOffGasDecon 19

117

15

23

1

34

52

261

261

45

629

57,149

1,961

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 14 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours DecontaminationofSiteBuildings(continued) 4b.1.10.5 LLRWStorageDecon 10

36

9

14

20

22

112

112

379

33,330

653

4b.1.10.6 MiscellaneousBuildingsDecon 10

48

9

13

20

25

126

126

372

32,778

831

4b.1.10.7 NewRadwasteBuildingDecon 47

441

58

88

4

130

186

955

955

235

2,420

222,115

7,003

4b.1.10.8 OldRadwasteBuildingDecon

410

237

359

3

535

314

1,859

1,859

152

9,965

882,859

4,833

4b.1.10.9 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon 103

494

36

55

82

207

977

977

1,521

133,878

8,806

4b.1.10.10 TurbineBuilding0ftDecon 72

532

58

88

22

127

223

1,122

1,122

1,144

2,356

252,047

8,702

4b.1.10.11 TurbineBuilding23ftDecon 47

381

44

68

21

97

161

818

818

1,109

1,789

200,730

6,140

4b.1.10.12 TurbineBuilding46ftDecon 29

121

26

39

58

68

340

340

1,073

94,413

2,127

4b.1.10.13 DrywellDecon 4

727

395

513

1,006

552

3,198

3,198

16,964

1,290,650

9,848

4b.1.10.14 DrywellLinerRemoval 2,063

1,197

74

105

422

71

1,435

5,366

5,366

22,108

1,022

956,216

47,924

4b.1.10.15 RB0TorusRemoval 2,765

1,375

110

156

626

105

1,881

7,017

7,017

32,774

1,515

1,417,560

60,646

4b.1.10.16 ReactorBuildingSystemsRemoval

6

18

27

40

17

107

107

736

64,800

101

4b.1.10.17 ReactorBuilding19ftDecon 33

277

28

44

39

57

115

593

593

2,052

1,043

172,007

4,412

4b.1.10.18 ReactorBuilding119ftDecon 442

537

16

24

30

29

372

1,450

1,450

1,563

526

107,572

14,581

4b.1.10.19 ReactorBuilding23ftDecon 21

128

19

29

43

60

299

299

796

70,017

2,140

4b.1.10.20 ReactorBuilding51ftDecon 24

133

21

32

48

64

322

322

887

78,096

2,253

4b.1.10.21 ReactorBuilding75ftDecon 8

71

7

11

16

28

141

141

297

26,136

1,155

4b.1.10.22 ReactorBuilding91ftDecon 17

111

15

23

34

50

250

250

634

55,770

1,847

4b.1.10 Totals 5,715

7,712

1,558

2,257

1,168

3,369

6,297

28,076

28,076

61,196

60,173

7,490,445

193,816

4b.1 SubtotalPeriod4bActivityCosts 6,260

26,416

2,530

3,671

4,569

5,459

12,412

61,317

59,530

1,787

239,206

90,639

16,453,780

480,758

Period4bAdditionalCosts 4b.2.1 ISFSILicenseTermination

1,563

1,587

1,411

999

5,560

5,560

19,521

2,578,520

4b.2.2 ISFSILicenseTerminationCascadingCosts

778

247

154

1,179

1,179

4b.2.3 LicenseTerminationSurveyPlanning

1,948

584

2,532

2,532

12,480

4b.2.4 ContaminatedSoilRemoval

111

2

500

5,702

1,529

7,844

7,844

106,200

8,071,193

834

4b.2 SubtotalPeriod4bAdditionalCosts

2,453

2

500

7,289

3,605

3,266

17,116

10,376

6,739

125,721

10,649,710

834

12,480

Period4bCollateralCosts 4b.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 52

33

88

159

82

414

414

466

27,948

91

4b.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

592

89

681

681

4b.3.4 DecommissioningEquipmentDisposition

155

49

127

44

53

427

427

6,000

635

305,961

88

4b.3 SubtotalPeriod4bCollateralCosts 52

592

188

137

127

203

224

1,521

1,521

6,000

1,101

333,910

179

Period4bPeriodDependentCosts 4b.4.1 Deconsupplies 1,124

281

1,404

1,404

4b.4.2 Insurance

850

85

935

935

4b.4.3 Propertytaxes

1,481

148

1,629

1,629

4b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

2,768

692

3,460

3,460

4b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

2,955

443

3,398

3,398

4b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

171

121

424

141

857

857

7,415

148,298

242

4b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

2,132

320

2,452

2,452

4b.4.8 NRCFees

1,063

106

1,170

1,170

4b.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

458

69

527

527

4b.4.10 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

574

86

661

661

4b.4.11 SecurityStaffCost

5,378

807

6,185

6,185

96,607

4b.4.12 DOCStaffCost

17,703

2,655

20,358

20,358

207,126

4b.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

29,142

4,371

33,513

33,513

364,789

4b.4 SubtotalPeriod4bPeriodDependentCosts 1,124

5,723

171

121

424

58,782

10,205

76,549

76,549

7,415

148,298

242

668,521

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 15 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 4b.0 TOTALPERIOD4bCOST 7,435

35,184

2,891

4,429

4,696

13,374

62,387

26,106

156,503

147,976

6,739

1,787

245,206

224,875

27,585,700

482,012

681,001

PERIOD4fLicenseTermination Period4fDirectDecommissioningActivities 4f.1.1 ORISEconfirmatorysurvey

161

48

210

210

4f.1.2 Terminatelicense a

4f.1 SubtotalPeriod4fActivityCosts

161

48

210

210

Period4fAdditionalCosts 4f.2.1 LicenseTerminationSurvey

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

4f.2 SubtotalPeriod4fAdditionalCosts

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

Period4fCollateralCosts 4f.3.1 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

4f.3 SubtotalPeriod4fCollateralCosts

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

Period4fPeriodDependentCosts 4f.4.2 Propertytaxes

753

75

828

828

4f.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

802

201

1,003

1,003

4f.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

8

6

20

7

41

41

351

7,025

11

4f.4.5 Plantenergybudget

289

43

332

332

4f.4.6 NRCFees

579

58

637

637

4f.4.7 SiteO&MCosts

233

35

268

268

4f.4.8 SecurityStaffCost

1,087

163

1,250

1,250

18,857

4f.4.9 DOCStaffCost

5,156

773

5,929

5,929

57,357

4f.4.10 UtilityStaffCost

6,703

1,005

7,708

7,708

74,643

4f.4 SubtotalPeriod4fPeriodDependentCosts

802

8

6

20

14,800

2,361

17,997

17,997

351

7,025

11

150,857

4f.0 TOTALPERIOD4fCOST

802

8

6

20

24,286

5,038

30,161

30,161

351

7,025

118,812

157,097

PERIOD4TOTALS 7,771

57,660

14,293

8,894

9,279

26,034

133,462

56,363

313,755

305,080

6,739

1,936

470,101

255,880

1,002

470

1,428

40,119,960

783,607

1,366,638

PERIOD5bSiteRestoration Period5bDirectDecommissioningActivities DemolitionofRemainingSiteBuildings 5b.1.1.1 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon

1,019

153

1,172

1,172

1,665

5b.1.1.2 AdministrationBuilding

506

76

582

582

6,477

5b.1.1.3 AugmentedOffGasBuilding

338

51

388

388

3,399

5b.1.1.4 ChlorinationBuilding

32

5

36

36

407

5b.1.1.5 DieselGeneratorBuilding

137

21

157

157

1,268

5b.1.1.6 DilutionStructure

178

27

205

205

1,758

5b.1.1.7 DomesticWaterFacility

11

2

12

12

147

5b.1.1.8 FirePumpHouse

4

1

5

5

54

5b.1.1.9 FreshWaterPumpHouse

22

3

26

26

293

5b.1.1.10 HeatingBoilerHouse

41

6

48

48

546

5b.1.1.11 IntakeStructure

632

95

727

727

6,322

5b.1.1.12 LowLevelRadwasteStorage

444

67

511

511

5,435

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 16 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours DemolitionofRemainingSiteBuildings(continued) 5b.1.1.13 MachineShop

226

34

260

260

2,858

5b.1.1.14 MainGateSecurity

101

15

116

116

1,059

5b.1.1.15 MaintenanceBuilding

326

49

375

375

4,274

5b.1.1.16 MaterialsWarehouse

879

132

1,011

1,011

8,908

5b.1.1.17 MiscellaneousStructures

617

93

710

710

6,565

5b.1.1.18 NewRadwasteBuilding

745

112

857

857

8,009

5b.1.1.19 NewSamplePumpHouse

9

1

11

11

128

5b.1.1.20 OfficeBuilding

374

56

430

430

4,459

5b.1.1.21 OldRadwasteBuilding

680

102

782

782

6,852

5b.1.1.22 PlantEngineering

170

25

195

195

1,784

5b.1.1.23 PretreatmentBuilding

31

5

35

35

420

5b.1.1.24 ReactorBuilding

6,127

919

7,046

7,046

61,454

5b.1.1.25 SamplePool

15

2

18

18

180

5b.1.1.26 SecurityModifications

1,256

188

1,444

1,444

10,330

5b.1.1.27 SiteEmergencyBuilding

316

47

363

363

3,285

5b.1.1.28 TankPads&Misc.Yard

772

116

887

887

8,326

5b.1.1.29 TurbineBuilding

4,209

631

4,840

4,840

41,424

5b.1.1.30 TurbinePedestal

574

86

660

660

5,050

5b.1.1 Totals

20,789

3,118

23,908

23,908

203,134

SiteCloseoutActivities 5b.1.2 RemoveRubble

798

120

917

917

4,211

5b.1.3 Grade&landscapesite

634

95

729

729

1,304

5b.1.4 FinalreporttoNRC

187

28

215

215

1,560

5b.1 SubtotalPeriod5bActivityCosts

22,221

187

3,361

25,769

215

25,554

208,649

1,560

Period5bAdditionalCosts 5b.2.1 ConcreteCrushing

756

9

115

880

880

3,219

5b.2.2 InstallCofferdamsIntake&Dilution

975

146

1,122

1,122

8,296

5b.2.3 ISFSISiteRestoration

103

6

16

126

126

5b.2 SubtotalPeriod5bAdditionalCosts

1,835

15

278

2,128

126

2,002

11,516

Period5bCollateralCosts 5b.3.1 Smalltoolallowance

265

40

305

305

5b.3 SubtotalPeriod5bCollateralCosts

265

40

305

305

Period5bPeriodDependentCosts 5b.4.2 Propertytaxes

1,552

155

1,708

1,708

5b.4.3 Heavyequipmentrental

4,438

666

5,104

5,104

5b.4.4 Plantenergybudget

298

45

343

343

5b.4.5 SiteO&MCost

480

72

552

552

5b.4.6 SecurityStaffCost

2,242

336

2,578

2,578

38,880

5b.4.7 DOCStaffCost

10,204

1,531

11,735

11,735

110,160

5b.4.8 UtilityStaffCost

5,737

861

6,598

6,598

63,180

5b.4 SubtotalPeriod5bPeriodDependentCosts

4,438

20,514

3,665

28,617

28,617

212,220

5b.0 TOTALPERIOD5bCOST

28,759

20,716

7,344

56,818

215

126

56,478

220,165

213,780

PERIOD5TOTALS

28,759

20,716

7,344

56,818

215

126

56,478

220,165

213,780

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix D, Page 17 of 17 Table D Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Delayed DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Thousands of 2011 Dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:40 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSION 16,514

107,183

14,647

11,290

10,035

30,474

574,216

135,859

900,219

541,703

299,125

59,390

470,429

312,624

1,002

470

1,428

44,260,660

1,272,391

6,076,148

TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSIONWITH17.77%CONTINGENCY:

$900,219 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALNRCLICENSETERMINATIONCOSTIS60.17%OR:

$541,703 thousandsof2011dollars SPENTFUELMANAGEMENTCOSTIS33.23%OR:

$299,125 thousandsof2011dollars NONNUCLEARDEMOLITIONCOSTIS6.6%OR:

$59,390 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALLOWLEVELRADIOACTIVEWASTEVOLUMEBURIED(EXCLUDINGGTCC):

314,095 cubicfeet TOTALGREATERTHANCLASSCRADWASTEVOLUMEGENERATED:

1,428 cubicfeet TOTALSCRAPMETALREMOVED:

24,292 tons TOTALCRAFTLABORREQUIREMENTS:

1,272,391 manhours EndNotes:

n/aindicatesthatthisactivitynotchargedasdecommissioningexpense.

aindicatesthatthisactivityperformedbydecommissioningstaff.

0indicatesthatthisvalueislessthan0.5butisnonzero.

acellcontaining""indicatesazerovalue TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix E, Page 1 of 18 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX E DETAILED COST ANALYSIS SAFSTOR

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 2 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD1aShutdownthroughTransition Period1aDirectDecommissioningActivities 1a.1.1 SAFSTORsitecharacterizationsurvey

434

130

564

564

1a.1.2 Preparepreliminarydecommissioningcost

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.3 NotificationofCessationofOperations a

1a.1.4 Removefuel&sourcematerial n/a 1a.1.5 NotificationofPermanentDefueling a

1a.1.6 Deactivateplantsystems&processwaste a

1a.1.7 PrepareandsubmitPSDAR

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.8 Reviewplantdwgs&specs.

156

23

179

179

1,300

1a.1.9 Performdetailedradsurvey a

1a.1.10 Estimatebyproductinventory

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.11 Endproductdescription

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.12 Detailedbyproductinventory

179

27

206

206

1,500

1a.1.13 Definemajorworksequence

120

18

138

138

1,000

1a.1.14 PerformSERandEA

371

56

427

427

3,100

1a.1.15 PerformSiteSpecificCostStudy

598

90

688

688

5,000

ActivitySpecifications 1a.1.16.1 PrepareplantandfacilitiesforSAFSTOR

589

88

677

677

4,920

1a.1.16.2 Plantsystems

499

75

573

573

4,167

1a.1.16.3 Plantstructuresandbuildings

373

56

429

429

3,120

1a.1.16.4 Wastemanagement

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.16.5 Facilityandsitedormancy

239

36

275

275

2,000

1a.1.16 Total

1,939

291

2,230

2,230

16,207

DetailedWorkProcedures 1a.1.17.1 Plantsystems

142

21

163

163

1,183

1a.1.17.2 Facilitycloseout&dormancy

144

22

165

165

1,200

1a.1.17 Total

285

43

328

328

2,383

1a.1.18 Procurevacuumdryingsystem

12

2

14

14

100

1a.1.19 Drain/deenergizenoncont.systems a

1a.1.20 Drain&dryNSSS a

1a.1.21 Drain/deenergizecontaminatedsystems a

1a.1.22 Decon/securecontaminatedsystems a

1a.1 SubtotalPeriod1aActivityCosts

4,728

774

5,503

5,503

35,890

Period1aAdditionalCosts 1a.2.1 ISFSIExpansion

5,200

780

5,980

5,980

1a.2 SubtotalPeriod1aAdditionalCosts

5,200

780

5,980

5,980

Period1aCollateralCosts 1a.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

10,977

1,647

12,623

12,623

1a.3 SubtotalPeriod1aCollateralCosts

10,977

1,647

12,623

12,623

Period1aPeriodDependentCosts 1a.4.1 Insurance

2,227

223

2,450

2,450

1a.4.2 Propertytaxes

1a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

469

117

586

586

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 3 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period1aPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 1a.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

462

69

531

531

1a.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

14

10

35

12

70

70

610

12,190

20

1a.4.6 Plantenergybudget

1,918

288

2,206

2,206

1a.4.7 NRCFees

769

77

846

846

1a.4.8 EmergencyPlanningFees

564

56

621

621

1a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

309

46

355

355

1a.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

763

114

878

878

1a.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

89

13

103

103

1a.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

8,441

1,266

9,707

9,707

157,471

1a.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

33,041

4,956

37,997

37,997

423,400

1a.4 SubtotalPeriod1aPeriodDependentCosts

931

14

10

35

48,122

7,238

56,350

54,749

1,601

610

12,190

20

580,871

1a.0 TOTALPERIOD1aCOST

931

14

10

35

69,028

10,439

80,456

60,252

20,205

610

12,190

20

616,761

PERIOD1bSAFSTORLimitedDECONActivities Period1bDirectDecommissioningActivities DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 1b.1.1.1 NewRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

0

0

0

1

1b.1.1.2 OldRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

0

0

0

1

1b.1.1.3 AugmentedOffGasDecon 2

1

3

3

33

1b.1.1.4 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon 54

27

81

81

849

1b.1.1.5 TurbineBuilding0ftDecon 10

5

15

15

137

1b.1.1.6 DrywellLinerRemoval 2,063

1,031

3,094

3,094

28,819

1b.1.1.7 RB0TorusRemoval 2,765

1,383

4,148

4,148

38,634

1b.1.1.8 ReactorBuilding19ftDecon 7

3

10

10

96

1b.1.1.9 ReactorBuilding119ftDecon 429

215

644

644

5,996

1b.1.1 Totals 5,330

2,665

7,996

7,996

74,565

1b.1 SubtotalPeriod1bActivityCosts 5,330

2,665

7,996

7,996

74,565

Period1bAdditionalCosts 1b.2.1 Spentfuelpoolisolation

10,280

1,542

11,822

11,822

1b.2 SubtotalPeriod1bAdditionalCosts

10,280

1,542

11,822

11,822

Period1bCollateralCosts 1b.3.1 Deconequipment 902

135

1,037

1,037

1b.3.2 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 288

127

343

620

363

1,742

1,742

1,817

109,041

354

1b.3.4 Smalltoolallowance

100

15

115

115

1b.3.5 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

2,737

410

3,147

3,147

1b.3 SubtotalPeriod1bCollateralCosts 1,190

100

127

343

620

2,737

924

6,042

2,894

3,147

1,817

109,041

354

Period1bPeriodDependentCosts 1b.4.1 Deconsupplies 1,056

264

1,320

1,320

1b.4.2 Insurance

418

42

459

459

1b.4.3 Propertytaxes

601

60

661

661

1b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

442

111

553

553

1b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

115

17

132

132

1b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

4

3

9

3

19

19

164

3,277

5

1b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

478

72

550

550

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 4 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period1bPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 1b.4.8 NRCFees

192

19

211

211

1b.4.9 EmergencyPlanningFees

141

14

155

155

1b.4.10 SiteO&MCosts

77

12

89

89

1b.4.11 SpentFuelPoolO&M

190

29

219

219

1b.4.12 ISFSIOperatingCosts

22

3

26

26

1b.4.13 SecurityStaffCost

2,104

316

2,420

2,420

39,260

1b.4.14 UtilityStaffCost

8,238

1,236

9,473

9,473

105,560

1b.4 SubtotalPeriod1bPeriodDependentCosts 1,056

558

4

3

9

12,461

2,196

16,286

15,887

399

164

3,277

5

144,820

1b.0 TOTALPERIOD1bCOST 7,576

658

131

346

630

25,477

7,328

42,145

38,599

3,546

1,981

112,319

74,925

144,820

PERIOD1cPreparationsforSAFSTORDormancy Period1cDirectDecommissioningActivities 1c.1.1 Preparesupportequipmentforstorage

489

73

562

562

3,000

1c.1.2 Installcontainmentpressureequal.lines

51

8

59

59

700

1c.1.3 Interimsurveypriortodormancy

733

220

953

953

12,166

1c.1.4 Securebuildingaccesses a

1c.1.5 Prepare&submitinterimreport

70

10

80

80

583

1c.1 SubtotalPeriod1cActivityCosts

540

803

311

1,654

1,654

15,866

583

Period1cCollateralCosts 1c.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 238

105

284

513

300

1,440

1,440

1,503

90,169

293

1c.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

5

1

6

6

1c.3.4 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

2,737

410

3,147

3,147

1c.3 SubtotalPeriod1cCollateralCosts 238

5

105

284

513

2,737

711

4,593

1,446

3,147

1,503

90,169

293

Period1cPeriodDependentCosts 1c.4.1 Insurance

418

42

459

459

1c.4.2 Propertytaxes

601

60

661

661

1c.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

187

47

234

234

1c.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

115

17

132

132

1c.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

4

2

9

3

18

18

152

3,039

5

1c.4.6 Plantenergybudget

478

72

550

550

1c.4.7 NRCFees

192

19

211

211

1c.4.8 EmergencyPlanningFees

141

14

155

155

1c.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

77

12

89

89

1c.4.10 SpentFuelPoolO&M

190

29

219

219

1c.4.11 ISFSIOperatingCosts

22

3

26

26

1c.4.12 SecurityStaffCost

2,104

316

2,420

2,420

39,260

1c.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

8,238

1,236

9,473

9,473

105,560

1c.4 SubtotalPeriod1cPeriodDependentCosts

302

4

2

9

12,461

1,869

14,646

14,247

399

152

3,039

5

144,820

1c.0 TOTALPERIOD1cCOST 238

847

109

286

522

16,000

2,891

20,893

17,346

3,546

1,655

93,209

16,164

145,403

PERIOD1TOTALS 7,813

2,435

254

642

1,186

110,505 20,658

143,494

116,197

27,297

4,246

217,718

91,109

906,985

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 5 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD2aSAFSTORDormancywithWetSpentFuelStorage Period2aDirectDecommissioningActivities 2a.1.1 QuarterlyInspection a

2a.1.2 Semiannualenvironmentalsurvey a

2a.1.3 Preparereports a

2a.1.4 Bituminousroofreplacement

196

29

225

225

2a.1.5 Maintenancesupplies

540

135

675

675

2a.1 SubtotalPeriod2aActivityCosts

736

164

901

901

Period2aCollateralCosts 2a.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

43,967

6,595

50,562

50,562

2a.3 SubtotalPeriod2aCollateralCosts

43,967

6,595

50,562

50,562

Period2aPeriodDependentCosts 2a.4.1 Insurance

3,396

340

3,735

2,526

1,209

2a.4.2 Propertytaxes

5,402

540

5,943

4,403

1,540

2a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

753

188

942

942

2a.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

21

15

53

18

107

107

922

18,431

30

2a.4.5 Plantenergybudget

1,537

230

1,767

884

884

2a.4.6 NRCFees

883

88

971

971

2a.4.7 SiteO&MCosts

1,238

186

1,424

1,424

2a.4.8 SpentFuelPoolO&M

3,057

459

3,515

3,515

2a.4.9 ISFSIOperatingCosts

358

54

412

412

2a.4.10 SecurityStaffCost

24,118

3,618

27,736

8,574

19,162

444,866

2a.4.11 UtilityStaffCost

25,724

3,859

29,582

6,534

23,049

329,994

2a.4 SubtotalPeriod2aPeriodDependentCosts

753

21

15

53

65,713

9,579

76,134

26,364

49,770

922

18,431

30

774,860

2a.0 TOTALPERIOD2aCOST

753

21

15

53

110,416 16,338

127,597

27,264

100,332

922

18,431

30

774,860

PERIOD2bSAFSTORDormancywithDrySpentFuelStorage Period2bDirectDecommissioningActivities 2b.1.1 QuarterlyInspection a

2b.1.2 Semiannualenvironmentalsurvey a

2b.1.3 Preparereports a

2b.1.4 Bituminousroofreplacement

563

84

647

647

2b.1.5 Maintenancesupplies

1,553

388

1,941

1,941

2b.1 SubtotalPeriod2bActivityCosts

2,115

473

2,588

2,588

Period2bCollateralCosts 2b.3.1 SpentFuelCapitalandTransfer

9,500

1,425

10,925

10,925

2b.3 SubtotalPeriod2bCollateralCosts

9,500

1,425

10,925

10,925

Period2bPeriodDependentCosts 2b.4.1 Insurance

6,600

660

7,260

7,260

2b.4.2 Propertytaxes

11,502

1,150

12,652

12,652

2b.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

1,050

263

1,313

1,313

2b.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

29

21

73

24

147

147

1,272

25,441

41

2b.4.5 Plantenergybudget

2,208

331

2,539

2,539

2b.4.6 NRCISFSIFees

559

56

615

615

2b.4.7 NRCFees

2,536

254

2,790

2,790

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 6 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period2bPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 2b.4.8 SiteO&MCosts

3,558

534

4,091

4,091

2b.4.9 ISFSIOperatingCosts

1,030

154

1,184

1,184

2b.4.10 SecurityStaffCost

36,444

5,467

41,911

24,637

17,274

648,154

2b.4.11 UtilityStaffCost

30,398

4,560

34,958

18,774

16,184

384,091

2b.4 SubtotalPeriod2bPeriodDependentCosts

1,050

29

21

73

94,835

13,452

109,460

74,203

35,258

1,272

25,441

41

1,032,246

2b.0 TOTALPERIOD2bCOST

1,050

29

21

73

106,451 15,350

122,973

76,791

46,183

1,272

25,441

41

1,032,246

PERIOD2cSAFSTORDormancywithoutSpentFuelStorage Period2cDirectDecommissioningActivities 2c.1.1 QuarterlyInspection a

2c.1.2 Semiannualenvironmentalsurvey a

2c.1.3 Preparereports a

2c.1.4 Bituminousroofreplacement

1,875

281

2,156

2,156

2c.1.5 Maintenancesupplies

5,174

1,293

6,467

6,467

2c.1 SubtotalPeriod2cActivityCosts

7,049

1,575

8,624

8,624

Period2cPeriodDependentCosts 2c.4.1 Insurance

21,991

2,199

24,190

24,190

2c.4.2 Propertytaxes

38,324

3,832

42,157

42,157

2c.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

3,291

823

4,114

4,114

2c.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

90

64

223

74

451

451

3,904

78,074

127

2c.4.5 Plantenergybudget

7,356

1,103

8,459

8,459

2c.4.6 NRCFees

7,657

766

8,423

8,423

2c.4.7 SiteO&MCosts

11,854

1,778

13,633

13,633

2c.4.8 SecurityStaffCost

71,385

10,708

82,093

82,093

1,199,829

2c.4.9 UtilityStaffCost

54,396

8,159

62,556

62,556

699,900

2c.4 SubtotalPeriod2cPeriodDependentCosts

3,291

90

64

223

212,964 29,443

246,076

246,076

3,904

78,074

127

1,899,729

2c.0 TOTALPERIOD2cCOST

3,291

90

64

223

220,013 31,018

254,699

254,699

3,904

78,074

127

1,899,729

PERIOD2TOTALS

5,095

141

100

349

436,879 62,706

505,269

358,754

146,515

6,097

121,947

199

3,706,834

PERIOD3aReactivateSiteFollowingSAFSTORDormancy Period3aDirectDecommissioningActivities 3a.1.1 Preparepreliminarydecommissioningcost

156

23

179

179

1,300

3a.1.2 Reviewplantdwgs&specs.

550

83

633

633

4,600

3a.1.3 Performdetailedradsurvey a

3a.1.4 Endproductdescription

120

18

138

138

1,000

3a.1.5 Detailedbyproductinventory

156

23

179

179

1,300

3a.1.6 Definemajorworksequence

897

135

1,032

1,032

7,500

3a.1.7 PerformSERandEA

371

56

427

427

3,100

3a.1.8 PerformSiteSpecificCostStudy

598

90

688

688

5,000

3a.1.9 Prepare/submitLicenseTerminationPlan

490

74

564

564

4,096

3a.1.10 ReceiveNRCapprovalofterminationplan a

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 7 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours ActivitySpecifications 3a.1.11.1 Reactivateplant&temporaryfacilities

882

132

1,014

913

101

7,370

3a.1.11.2 Plantsystems

499

75

573

516

57

4,167

3a.1.11.3 Reactorinternals

850

127

977

977

7,100

3a.1.11.4 Reactorvessel

778

117

894

894

6,500

3a.1.11.5 Sacrificialshield

60

9

69

69

500

3a.1.11.6 Moistureseparators/reheaters

120

18

138

138

1,000

3a.1.11.7 Reinforcedconcrete

191

29

220

110

110

1,600

3a.1.11.8 MainTurbine

250

37

287

287

2,088

3a.1.11.9 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

3a.1.11.10 Pressuresuppressionstructure

239

36

275

275

2,000

3a.1.11.11 Drywell

191

29

220

220

1,600

3a.1.11.12 Plantstructures&buildings

373

56

429

215

215

3,120

3a.1.11.13 Wastemanagement

550

83

633

633

4,600

3a.1.11.14 Facility&sitecloseout

108

16

124

62

62

900

3a.1.11 Total

5,340

801

6,141

5,596

545

44,633

Planning&SitePreparations 3a.1.12 Preparedismantlingsequence

287

43

330

330

2,400

3a.1.13 Plantprep.&temp.svces

2,800

420

3,220

3,220

3a.1.14 Designwatercleanupsystem

168

25

193

193

1,400

3a.1.15 Rigging/Cont.CntrlEnvlps/tooling/etc.

2,200

330

2,530

2,530

3a.1.16 Procurecasks/liners&containers

147

22

169

169

1,230

3a.1 SubtotalPeriod3aActivityCosts

14,280

2,142

16,422

15,876

545

77,559

Period3aPeriodDependentCosts 3a.4.1 Insurance

573

57

631

631

3a.4.2 Propertytaxes

999

100

1,099

1,099

3a.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

410

102

512

512

3a.4.4 Heavyequipmentrental

462

69

531

531

3a.4.5 DisposalofDAWgenerated

12

8

29

10

59

59

514

10,287

17

3a.4.6 Plantenergybudget

1,918

288

2,206

2,206

3a.4.7 NRCFees

272

27

299

299

3a.4.8 SiteO&MCosts

309

46

355

355

3a.4.9 SecurityStaffCost

3,629

544

4,173

4,173

65,179

3a.4.10 UtilityStaffCost

20,498

3,075

23,573

23,573

258,629

3a.4 SubtotalPeriod3aPeriodDependentCosts

872

12

8

29

28,199

4,319

33,440

33,440

514

10,287

17

323,807

3a.0 TOTALPERIOD3aCOST

872

12

8

29

42,479

6,461

49,861

49,316

545

514

10,287

17

401,366

PERIOD3bDecommissioningPreparations Period3bDirectDecommissioningActivities DetailedWorkProcedures 3b.1.1.1 Plantsystems

566

85

651

586

65

4,733

3b.1.1.2 Reactorinternals

479

72

550

550

4,000

3b.1.1.3 Remainingbuildings

162

24

186

46

139

1,350

3b.1.1.4 CRDhousings&NIs

120

18

138

138

1,000

3b.1.1.5 Incoreinstrumentation

120

18

138

138

1,000

3b.1.1.6 Removalprimarycontainment

239

36

275

275

2,000

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 8 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours DetailedWorkProcedures(continued) 3b.1.1.7 Reactorvessel

434

65

499

499

3,630

3b.1.1.8 Facilitycloseout

144

22

165

83

83

1,200

3b.1.1.9 Sacrificialshield

144

22

165

165

1,200

3b.1.1.10 Reinforcedconcrete

120

18

138

69

69

1,000

3b.1.1.11 MainTurbine

249

37

286

286

2,080

3b.1.1.12 MainCondensers

250

37

287

287

2,088

3b.1.1.13 Moistureseparators&reheaters

239

36

275

275

2,000

3b.1.1.14 Radwastebuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

3b.1.1.15 Reactorbuilding

327

49

376

338

38

2,730

3b.1.1 Total

3,917

588

4,505

4,074

431

32,741

3b.1 SubtotalPeriod3bActivityCosts

3,917

588

4,505

4,074

431

32,741

Period3bAdditionalCosts 3b.2.1 SiteCharacterization

4,986

1,496

6,482

6,482

27,140

9,952

3b.2.2 DispositionofLiquidRCRAWaste(notLead)

17

529

135

680

680

2,019

115,076

3b.2.3 DispositionofPCBSoilRCRAWaste(notLead)

1,362

1,450

567

3,378

3,378

27,000

3,240,000

3b.2.4 DispositionofLeadInventory

26

756

117

899

899

328

232,673

3b.2.5 AsbestosRemediation

12,217

2

279

1,030

3,354

16,883

16,883

19,193

249,515

150,230

3b.2 SubtotalPeriod3bAdditionalCosts

12,217

2

1,684

756

3,009

4,986

5,669

28,323

28,323

328

48,212

3,837,264

177,370

9,952

Period3bCollateralCosts 3b.3.1 Deconequipment 902

135

1,037

1,037

3b.3.2 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

3b.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

184

28

211

211

3b.3.4 Pipecuttingequipment

1,100

165

1,265

1,265

3b.3 SubtotalPeriod3bCollateralCosts 902

1,284

1,124

496

3,806

3,806

Period3bPeriodDependentCosts 3b.4.1 Deconsupplies 28

7

35

35

3b.4.2 Insurance

287

29

316

316

3b.4.3 Propertytaxes

501

50

551

551

3b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

879

220

1,099

1,099

3b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

232

35

266

266

3b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

7

5

17

6

34

34

292

5,834

10

3b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

962

144

1,106

1,106

3b.4.8 NRCFees

136

14

150

150

3b.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

155

23

178

178

3b.4.10 SecurityStaffCost

1,819

273

2,092

2,092

32,679

3b.4.11 DOCStaffCost

5,076

761

5,838

5,838

58,560

3b.4.12 UtilityStaffCost

10,277

1,542

11,819

11,819

129,669

3b.4 SubtotalPeriod3bPeriodDependentCosts 28

1,111

7

5

17

19,214

3,103

23,484

23,484

292

5,834

10

220,907

3b.0 TOTALPERIOD3bCOST 930

14,611

8

1,689

756

3,025

29,242

9,855

60,117

59,686

431

328

48,504

3,843,098

177,380

263,600

PERIOD3TOTALS 930

15,483

20

1,698

756

3,055

71,721

16,317

109,979

109,002

976

328

49,018

3,853,385

177,396

664,966

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 9 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours PERIOD4aLargeComponentRemoval Period4aDirectDecommissioningActivities NuclearSteamSupplySystemRemoval 4a.1.1.2 RecirculationPumps&Motors 10

108

41

79

50

108

83

480

480

633

527

196,350

2,156

4a.1.1.3 CRDMs&NIsRemoval 40

179

523

141

137

172

1,190

1,190

5,179

112,850

3,338

4a.1.1.4 ReactorVesselInternals 96

2,500

5,060

1,039

4,014

175

5,481

18,366

18,366

1,573

1,127

344

299,030

18,150

858

4a.1.1.5 Vessel&InternalsGTCCDisposal

4,450

667

5,117

5,117

1,428

282,300

4a.1.1.6 ReactorVessel

6,060

1,354

827

1,912

175

6,072

16,399

16,399

15,440

1,579,847

18,150

858

4a.1.1 Totals 146

8,846

6,979

2,086

50

10,620

349

12,475

41,551

41,551

633

22,720

1,127

344

1,428

2,470,377

41,795

1,716

RemovalofMajorEquipment 4a.1.2 MainTurbine/Generator

326

1,861

391

1,707

582

4,867

4,867

80,711

3,632,000

4,957

4a.1.3 MainCondensers

1,000

1,291

271

1,184

597

4,344

4,344

56,000

2,520,000

15,180

NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.7.1 7EB

162

9

9

7

23

49

259

259

362

334

33,679

2,492

4a.1.7.2 N2G

11

0

0

1

3

16

16

49

2,007

178

4a.1.7.3 N2P

24

1

1

6

7

40

40

341

13,830

357

4a.1.7.4 N3A

68

1

2

8

18

96

96

398

16,151

1,000

4a.1.7.5 N3D

81

1

2

10

22

115

115

501

20,362

1,263

4a.1.7.6 N3I

17

0

0

1

0

4

23

23

27

5

1,390

273

4a.1.7.7 N3N

101

1

2

9

27

139

139

447

18,140

1,529

4a.1.7.8 N3P

26

0

1

3

7

37

37

179

7,267

383

4a.1.7.9 N3Q

17

0

0

2

5

24

24

80

3,260

271

4a.1.7.10 N3R

17

0

0

2

5

24

24

97

3,934

261

4a.1.7.11 N3S

25

0

1

4

7

37

37

187

7,583

400

4a.1.7.12 N3T

16

0

0

1

4

21

21

58

2,357

243

4a.1.7.13 N3U

113

14

14

12

38

43

234

234

610

548

55,829

1,727

4a.1.7.14 N3W

117

16

15

12

41

45

247

247

643

604

60,369

1,792

4a.1.7.15 N3Y

208

5

13

58

63

348

348

3,054

124,028

3,179

4a.1.7.16 N51

28

0

1

5

8

42

42

239

9,707

433

4a.1.7.17 N52

23

1

1

2

3

7

38

38

121

43

7,290

353

4a.1.7.18 N53

35

2

3

5

5

11

61

61

248

75

14,268

541

4a.1.7.19 N54

17

1

1

1

2

5

26

26

46

28

3,435

260

4a.1.7.20 N55

73

1

2

8

20

104

104

414

16,809

1,137

4a.1.7.21 N56

97

1

3

14

27

143

143

734

29,828

1,389

4a.1.7.22 N5A

42

1

2

6

2

12

64

64

290

26

13,205

663

4a.1.7.23 N5B

39

1

1

6

11

58

58

307

12,485

621

4a.1.7.24 N5C

18

0

0

2

5

25

25

106

4,294

267

4a.1.7.25 N5D

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

152

6,190

426

4a.1.7.26 N5E

19

0

0

2

5

26

26

110

4,453

278

4a.1.7.27 N5F

27

2

1

2

3

8

43

43

91

45

6,294

408

4a.1.7.28 N5G

13

0

0

1

3

18

18

40

1,645

205

4a.1.7.29 N5H

11

1

1

0

2

3

18

18

5

26

1,667

172

4a.1.7.30 N5I

15

0

0

1

4

21

21

51

2,090

238

4a.1.7.31 N5J

12

0

1

3

3

19

19

131

5,328

187

4a.1.7.32 N5K

15

0

0

1

4

21

21

75

3,050

224

4a.1.7.33 N5N

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

143

5,803

433

4a.1.7.34 N5O

72

1

3

13

21

110

110

670

27,221

1,105

4a.1.7.35 N5P

26

2

2

3

4

9

46

46

183

62

10,822

420

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 10 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 4a.1.7.36 N5Q

26

2

2

3

4

8

46

46

182

61

10,719

414

4a.1.7.37 N5S

64

4

10

42

24

143

143

2,195

89,151

1,024

4a.1.7.38 N5T

59

2

3

12

3

18

97

97

606

40

26,812

930

4a.1.7.39 N5U

60

2

3

12

3

18

98

98

607

40

26,871

942

4a.1.7.40 N5Y

23

1

1

3

1

7

36

36

153

19

7,306

358

4a.1.7.41 N5Z

23

1

1

3

1

7

36

36

153

19

7,306

358

4a.1.7.42 PPA

75

1

3

11

21

110

110

572

23,240

1,139

4a.1.7 Totals

1,972

76

109

299

135

596

3,187

3,187

15,660

1,977

747,476

30,271

OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.8.1 7BA

83

1

2

9

22

117

117

480

19,481

1,272

4a.1.8.2 7DA

48

5

5

2

14

17

92

92

122

206

16,640

738

4a.1.8.3 7FA

22

1

2

4

3

7

39

39

206

43

10,810

355

4a.1.8.4 PBA

147

12

12

17

26

49

263

263

893

388

57,934

2,324

4a.1.8.5 PDA

52

1

2

7

14

75

75

373

15,150

808

4a.1.8.6 PMA

12

0

0

1

3

17

17

54

2,174

190

4a.1.8.7 PRA

82

1

4

16

24

128

128

855

34,703

1,292

4a.1.8.8 PTK/PTP

13

0

0

1

3

17

17

30

1,199

202

4a.1.8 Totals

460

21

26

57

43

141

749

749

3,011

637

158,091

7,180

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 4a.1.9.1 7CA

260

21

22

33

46

87

468

468

1,755

663

108,906

4,017

4a.1.9.2 TB2

961

19

52

227

284

1,544

1,544

11,906

483,529

14,570

4a.1.9.3 TB23

5

0

0

1

1

8

8

42

1,699

83

4a.1.9.4 TB38

16

0

1

2

5

24

24

124

5,034

229

4a.1.9.5 TC2

1,562

70

188

820

549

3,190

3,190

42,978

1,745,363

23,871

4a.1.9.6 TE2

186

12

20

60

22

65

365

365

3,126

317

144,922

2,822

4a.1.9.7 TEE

320

7

18

79

95

519

519

4,115

167,126

4,871

4a.1.9.8 TEG

26

0

1

3

7

36

36

139

5,640

380

4a.1.9.9 TP2

170

4

12

51

52

289

289

2,659

107,977

2,613

4a.1.9.10 TP3

113

9

10

16

20

38

205

205

859

292

51,008

1,793

4a.1.9.11 TPE

102

10

10

12

23

36

193

193

647

335

45,003

1,572

4a.1.9 Totals

3,722

153

332

1,305

110

1,219

6,840

6,840

68,349

1,608

2,866,205

56,820

4a.1.12 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

940

27

7

22

8

244

1,249

1,249

1,057

112

53,901

16,869

4a.1 SubtotalPeriod4aActivityCosts 146

17,267

10,408

3,223

4,625

10,916

349

15,854

62,787

62,787

225,422

27,054

1,127

344

1,428

12,448,050

173,072

1,716

Period4aCollateralCosts 4a.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 6

7

19

35

15

83

83

102

6,149

20

4a.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

210

31

241

217

24

4a.3 SubtotalPeriod4aCollateralCosts 6

210

7

19

35

47

324

300

24

102

6,149

20

Period4aPeriodDependentCosts 4a.4.1 Deconsupplies 52

13

65

65

4a.4.2 Insurance

539

54

593

593

4a.4.3 Propertytaxes

939

94

1,033

930

103

4a.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

1,186

297

1,483

1,483

4a.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

1,888

283

2,172

2,172

4a.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

80

57

198

66

400

400

3,462

69,233

113

4a.4.7 Plantenergybudget

1,712

257

1,969

1,969

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 11 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period4aPeriodDependentCosts(continued) 4a.4.8 NRCFees

674

67

741

741

4a.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

290

44

334

334

4a.4.10 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

364

55

419

419

4a.4.11 SecurityStaffCost

3,410

511

3,921

3,921

61,250

4a.4.12 DOCStaffCost

11,514

1,727

13,241

13,241

135,240

4a.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

19,437

2,916

22,353

22,353

245,000

4a.4 SubtotalPeriod4aPeriodDependentCosts 52

3,075

80

57

198

38,880

6,383

48,724

48,621

103

3,462

69,233

113

441,490

4a.0 TOTALPERIOD4aCOST 204

20,551

10,495

3,298

4,625

11,149

39,229

22,284

111,836

111,708

127

225,422

30,618

1,127

344

1,428

12,523,430

173,205

443,206

PERIOD4bSiteDecontamination Period4bDirectDecommissioningActivities 4b.1.1 Removespentfuelracks 545

64

142

226

744

523

2,243

2,243

10,858

615,095

1,071

DrywellSystemComponents 4b.1.2.1 IAA/IAC

329

218

191

136

527

285

1,685

1,685

7,111

7,660

723,932

5,700

4b.1.2.2 IBA

164

19

19

17

50

61

330

330

880

734

77,321

2,588

4b.1.2.3 ICA

263

36

32

35

79

99

543

543

1,841

1,148

140,037

4,149

4b.1.2.4 IEA

70

9

11

18

22

28

157

157

926

320

55,719

1,176

4b.1.2.5 RC6

65

1

2

8

18

95

95

440

17,889

989

4b.1.2 Totals

890

282

255

214

678

491

2,809

2,809

11,199

9,861

1,014,897

14,602

ReactorBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.3.1 RB1

202

4

11

48

60

324

324

2,495

101,308

2,991

4b.1.3.2 RBB

106

2

6

25

31

170

170

1,306

53,019

1,597

4b.1.3.3 RBC

108

2

6

28

33

178

178

1,485

60,294

1,647

4b.1.3.4 RBE

142

2

6

26

41

217

217

1,381

56,063

2,156

4b.1.3.5 RBF

121

14

14

14

35

45

244

244

740

516

59,235

1,909

4b.1.3.6 RBO

526

18

49

214

173

981

981

11,229

456,005

8,678

4b.1.3.7 RBS

247

22

27

53

50

88

486

486

2,757

727

153,183

3,897

4b.1.3.8 RBSW

135

2

6

26

39

207

207

1,343

54,558

2,077

4b.1.3.9 RC1/RC3

4

0

0

0

1

6

6

14

577

63

4b.1.3.10 RC7

90

2

5

21

27

145

145

1,106

44,917

1,311

4b.1.3.11 RCA

47

3

3

3

8

15

79

79

147

109

12,175

725

4b.1.3.12 RCB

69

2

3

10

2

20

105

105

501

28

21,917

1,051

4b.1.3.13 RCD

352

7

17

76

103

555

555

3,974

161,384

5,318

4b.1.3.14 RCG

67

2

5

22

21

116

116

1,136

46,136

1,041

4b.1.3.15 RCJ

74

1

3

12

21

110

110

617

25,044

1,121

4b.1.3.16 RCM

109

2

6

28

33

179

179

1,481

60,136

1,694

4b.1.3.17 RCN

243

3

9

40

69

365

365

2,107

85,581

3,666

4b.1.3.18 RCS

87

15

14

12

38

37

204

204

636

561

57,657

1,365

4b.1.3.19 RCT

57

1

2

9

16

84

84

464

18,858

858

4b.1.3.20 RD8

87

66

66

36

189

91

535

535

1,861

2,761

231,971

1,484

4b.1.3.21 RDM

48

0

1

5

13

67

67

268

10,870

701

4b.1.3.22 REC

216

3

9

37

61

326

326

1,953

79,329

3,190

4b.1.3.23 REF

100

23

21

13

60

47

264

264

667

875

76,709

1,550

4b.1.3.24 REH/REI

121

2

6

25

35

189

189

1,325

53,806

1,846

4b.1.3.25 REL

215

5

14

63

66

364

364

3,286

133,445

3,285

4b.1.3.26 REM

57

1

2

10

16

87

87

538

21,846

868

4b.1.3.27 REO

122

21

22

21

57

53

296

296

1,115

827

92,099

1,930

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 12 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours ReactorBuildingSystemComponents(continued) 4b.1.3.28 REQ

169

9

11

25

17

53

284

284

1,311

254

67,684

2,610

4b.1.3.29 RER

56

5

4

3

11

19

98

98

177

167

16,663

881

4b.1.3.30 RET

32

1

1

4

1

9

48

48

185

18

8,515

500

4b.1.3.31 REW

28

0

1

3

8

39

39

146

5,936

432

4b.1.3.32 REX

31

0

1

3

8

43

43

165

6,710

477

4b.1.3.33 REY

36

0

1

4

10

50

50

192

7,781

543

4b.1.3.34 RFB

159

3

7

31

46

246

246

1,622

65,859

2,449

4b.1.3.35 RFC

104

12

9

6

24

35

190

190

337

351

33,707

1,649

4b.1.3.36 RFF

111

2

4

18

31

166

166

923

37,469

1,696

4b.1.3.37 RFH

152

25

22

13

61

61

335

335

692

893

78,810

2,337

4b.1.3.38 RFJ

133

23

21

13

59

56

305

305

690

866

77,154

2,052

4b.1.3.39 RFL

85

1

3

14

24

128

128

754

30,625

1,337

4b.1.3.40 RFN

115

2

5

21

33

176

176

1,118

45,418

1,768

4b.1.3.41 RFQ

167

2

4

18

45

236

236

942

38,243

2,456

4b.1.3.42 RGC

89

1

3

13

25

130

130

667

27,107

1,368

4b.1.3.43 RGD

251

7

19

84

79

441

441

4,427

179,773

3,921

4b.1.3.44 RGI

53

1

2

8

15

78

78

414

16,826

835

4b.1.3.45 RGL

62

1

2

11

18

94

94

555

22,545

967

4b.1.3.46 RGP

29

0

1

5

8

43

43

238

9,661

437

4b.1.3.47 RGR

190

3

7

31

54

284

284

1,633

66,314

2,876

4b.1.3.48 RGU

85

1

2

10

23

121

121

547

22,199

1,312

4b.1.3.49 RH1

50

1

1

6

14

72

72

339

13,754

762

4b.1.3.50 RH2

37

1

2

10

11

62

62

550

22,340

572

4b.1.3.51 RH3/RH4/RH6

127

1

3

11

34

176

176

592

24,061

1,896

4b.1.3.52 RHA

21

1

2

2

4

7

36

36

83

57

6,596

326

4b.1.3.53 RHJ

45

0

1

5

12

64

64

282

11,443

687

4b.1.3.54 RHL

29

0

1

2

8

40

40

121

4,913

431

4b.1.3.55 RHX

54

1

2

8

15

80

80

440

17,877

814

4b.1.3.56 RHY

49

1

2

7

13

71

71

369

14,998

750

4b.1.3.57 RMCC

98

2

4

19

28

151

151

989

40,165

1,468

4b.1.3 Totals

6,397

332

482

1,287

618

2,053

11,170

11,170

67,430

9,010

3,249,269

98,630

NewRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.4.1 N38

173

2

6

27

48

256

256

1,392

56,536

2,566

4b.1.4.2 N48

88

1

2

10

24

125

125

530

21,506

1,308

4b.1.4.3 N4A

29

2

2

3

4

9

50

50

183

63

10,949

470

4b.1.4.4 N4B

28

2

2

3

4

9

46

46

162

53

9,549

442

4b.1.4.5 N4D

91

1

2

9

24

127

127

459

18,650

1,350

4b.1.4.6 N4E

7

0

0

0

2

9

9

17

687

107

4b.1.4.7 N4F

19

0

0

2

5

27

27

98

3,986

289

4b.1.4.8 N4H

22

1

1

4

2

7

38

38

217

23

10,137

364

4b.1.4.9 N4K

24

0

1

3

7

35

35

176

7,138

364

4b.1.4.10 N4L

35

0

1

3

10

49

49

177

7,195

553

4b.1.4.11 N5R

77

2

4

20

23

125

125

1,029

41,782

1,188

4b.1.4.12 N5V

59

4

5

9

10

20

107

107

482

146

27,568

934

4b.1.4.13 N5W

9

0

0

0

2

12

12

10

401

148

4b.1.4.14 N5X

74

1

4

16

22

116

116

842

34,176

1,155

4b.1.4 Totals

734

16

31

110

19

211

1,122

1,122

5,774

286

250,260

11,236

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 13 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours OldRadwasteBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.5.1 ORWPreD&DDesludgeandDecon

203

30

234

234

2,839

4b.1.5.2 PRD

15

0

1

3

4

23

23

151

6,112

245

4b.1.5.3 PSB

139

2

5

23

39

209

209

1,198

48,634

2,135

4b.1.5.4 PTA

39

1

2

7

11

59

59

371

15,084

601

4b.1.5.5 PUA

208

2

6

27

57

300

300

1,389

56,392

3,154

4b.1.5.6 PUU

141

5

10

35

5

44

239

239

1,825

83

78,582

2,225

4b.1.5.7 PVA

9

0

0

0

2

12

12

13

519

148

4b.1.5.8 UAB

304

4

10

45

85

448

448

2,367

96,117

4,649

4b.1.5.9 UAS

208

4

10

43

61

326

326

2,277

92,465

3,222

4b.1.5 Totals

1,268

18

44

183

5

334

1,851

1,851

9,590

83

393,904

19,219

TurbineBuildingSystemComponents 4b.1.6.1 TD2

60

1

2

7

17

87

87

390

15,850

875

4b.1.6.2 TF2

324

16

42

184

117

683

683

9,646

391,743

4,891

4b.1.6.3 TFG

23

0

1

3

6

34

34

150

6,106

361

4b.1.6.4 TG2

236

12

33

144

87

513

513

7,564

307,179

3,660

4b.1.6.5 TH2

459

21

56

243

162

940

940

12,740

517,385

7,040

4b.1.6.6 TKA

24

0

0

1

6

32

32

74

2,996

348

4b.1.6.7 TL2

100

7

6

10

14

32

168

168

523

201

32,662

1,480

4b.1.6.8 TMA

61

1

4

17

18

102

102

895

36,367

921

4b.1.6.9 TN2

320

7

19

85

96

528

528

4,447

180,585

4,873

4b.1.6.10 TO2

170

26

196

196

2,826

4b.1.6.11 TOA

87

2

4

19

26

138

138

1,014

41,172

1,303

4b.1.6.12 TOCR

74

3

7

32

25

141

141

1,692

68,697

1,058

4b.1.6.13 TOR

65

2

4

18

20

107

107

931

37,795

994

4b.1.6.14 TOV

19

0

0

2

5

27

27

98

3,978

292

4b.1.6.15 TOW

103

4

11

49

35

202

202

2,557

103,857

1,547

4b.1.6.16 TOX/TOY

28

0

1

2

8

39

39

124

5,052

423

4b.1.6.17 TS2

201

6

17

74

64

362

362

3,875

157,362

2,995

4b.1.6.18 TTA

60

1

4

17

18

101

101

899

36,508

957

4b.1.6.19 TU2

185

3

9

40

54

292

292

2,096

85,139

2,856

4b.1.6 Totals

2,599

87

221

949

14

820

4,691

4,495

196

49,717

201

2,030,434

39,701

AugmentedOffgasSystemComponents 4b.1.7.1 AY8

143

3

7

30

42

224

224

1,596

64,813

2,154

4b.1.7.2 AYA

30

1

2

10

9

53

53

512

20,775

459

4b.1.7.3 AYB

29

0

1

5

8

43

43

267

10,862

441

4b.1.7.4 AYC

73

2

4

19

22

120

120

1,012

41,078

1,127

4b.1.7.5 AYE

25

0

0

2

7

35

35

103

4,199

375

4b.1.7.6 AZ8

54

1

3

12

16

85

85

611

24,796

824

4b.1.7.7 AZA

12

0

0

1

3

17

17

40

1,638

188

4b.1.7.8 AZC

103

2

5

22

30

162

162

1,145

46,509

1,555

4b.1.7.9 AZD

17

0

0

1

5

24

24

75

3,063

267

4b.1.7.10 AZE

16

0

0

1

4

23

23

70

2,856

256

4b.1.7.11 AZF

15

0

0

2

4

22

22

90

3,672

239

4b.1.7.12 AZI

30

1

1

7

9

47

47

343

13,938

461

4b.1.7 Totals

547

10

26

112

158

853

853

5,865

238,198

8,345

MiscellaneousSystemComponents 4b.1.8.1 BAA

262

5

14

62

77

421

421

3,241

131,602

3,979

4b.1.8.2 BBA

88

4

10

42

30

173

173

2,183

88,656

1,368

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 14 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours MiscellaneousSystemComponents(continued) 4b.1.8.3 BDA

11

0

0

1

3

14

14

27

1,083

167

4b.1.8.4 CAA

615

17

45

196

192

1,064

1,064

10,252

416,330

9,611

4b.1.8.5 DAA

64

1

2

7

17

91

91

376

15,277

1,005

4b.1.8.6 DAC

152

2

5

23

42

225

225

1,230

49,940

2,323

4b.1.8.7 DGB

82

12

94

94

1,336

4b.1.8.8 DOT

14

2

16

16

223

4b.1.8.9 DPH

95

14

109

109

1,527

4b.1.8.10 DWF

22

3

25

25

360

4b.1.8.11 FWP

127

19

146

146

2,018

4b.1.8.12 GAA/GCA

23

3

26

26

368

4b.1.8.13 INTAKESTRUCTURE

199

30

229

229

3,218

4b.1.8.14 MAA

127

2

6

28

37

200

200

1,469

59,650

1,920

4b.1.8.15 MBA

51

1

2

8

14

76

76

413

16,776

764

4b.1.8.16 MBS/MBT

38

0

0

2

10

50

50

108

4,371

575

4b.1.8.17 MS

40

6

46

46

676

4b.1.8.18 NMBROOF

20

3

22

22

312

4b.1.8.19 OB

292

44

336

336

4,806

4b.1.8.20 PTB

43

6

49

49

688

4b.1.8.21 RSFROOF

29

0

1

3

8

42

42

175

7,097

451

4b.1.8.22 UYARD

1,807

10

27

118

474

2,435

2,435

6,162

250,262

21,730

4b.1.8.23 WAA

166

2

5

23

46

242

242

1,197

48,603

2,479

4b.1.8.24 WHS

19

3

22

22

318

4b.1.8.25 YARDAREAS

408

61

470

470

6,583

4b.1.8.26 YDA/YFA/YLA

2

0

0

0

1

3

3

19

783

30

4b.1.8 Totals

4,796

44

117

513

1,159

6,629

5,037

1,592

26,851

1,090,429

68,833

4b.1.9 Scaffoldinginsupportofdecommissioning

1,410

41

11

34

11

366

1,873

1,873

1,586

168

80,852

25,304

DecontaminationofSiteBuildings 4b.1.10.1 NewRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

146

103

156

0

233

129

767

767

6

4,340

382,187

2,226

4b.1.10.2 OldRadwasteBuildingSystemsRemoval 0

4

11

17

0

25

11

67

67

6

461

40,787

66

4b.1.10.3 TurbineBuildingSystemsRemoval

419

249

376

561

326

1,931

1,931

10,447

919,350

5,562

4b.1.10.4 AugmentedOffGasDecon 19

117

15

23

1

34

52

261

261

45

629

57,149

1,961

4b.1.10.5 LLRWStorageDecon 10

36

9

14

20

22

112

112

379

33,330

653

4b.1.10.6 MiscellaneousBuildingsDecon 10

48

9

13

20

25

126

126

372

32,778

831

4b.1.10.7 NewRadwasteBuildingDecon 47

441

58

88

4

130

186

955

955

235

2,420

222,115

7,003

4b.1.10.8 OldRadwasteBuildingDecon

410

237

359

3

535

314

1,859

1,859

152

9,965

882,859

4,833

4b.1.10.9 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon 103

494

36

55

82

207

977

977

1,521

133,878

8,806

4b.1.10.10 TurbineBuilding0ftDecon 72

532

58

88

22

127

223

1,122

1,122

1,144

2,356

252,047

8,702

4b.1.10.11 TurbineBuilding23ftDecon 47

381

44

68

21

97

161

818

818

1,109

1,789

200,730

6,140

4b.1.10.12 TurbineBuilding46ftDecon 29

121

26

39

58

68

340

340

1,073

94,413

2,127

4b.1.10.13 DrywellDecon 4

727

395

513

1,006

552

3,198

3,198

16,964

1,290,650

9,848

4b.1.10.14 DrywellLinerRemoval 2,063

1,197

74

105

422

71

1,435

5,366

5,366

22,108

1,022

956,216

47,924

4b.1.10.15 RB0TorusRemoval 2,765

1,375

110

156

626

105

1,881

7,017

7,017

32,774

1,515

1,417,560

60,646

4b.1.10.16 ReactorBuildingSystemsRemoval

6

18

27

40

17

107

107

736

64,800

101

4b.1.10.17 ReactorBuilding19ftDecon 33

277

28

44

39

57

115

593

593

2,052

1,043

172,007

4,412

4b.1.10.18 ReactorBuilding119ftDecon 442

537

16

24

30

29

372

1,450

1,450

1,563

526

107,572

14,581

4b.1.10.19 ReactorBuilding23ftDecon 21

128

19

29

43

60

299

299

796

70,017

2,140

4b.1.10.20 ReactorBuilding51ftDecon 24

133

21

32

48

64

322

322

887

78,096

2,253

4b.1.10.21 ReactorBuilding75ftDecon 8

71

7

11

16

28

141

141

297

26,136

1,155

4b.1.10.22 ReactorBuilding91ftDecon 17

111

15

23

34

50

250

250

634

55,770

1,847

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 15 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours 4b.1.10 Totals 5,715

7,712

1,558

2,257

1,168

3,369

6,297

28,076

28,076

61,196

60,173

7,490,445

193,816

4b.1 SubtotalPeriod4bActivityCosts 6,260

26,416

2,530

3,671

4,569

5,459

12,412

61,317

59,530

1,787

239,206

90,639

16,453,780

480,758

Period4bAdditionalCosts 4b.2.1 ISFSILicenseTermination

2,577

1,587

1,411

1,253

6,827

6,827

19,521

2,578,520

4b.2.2 ISFSILicenseTerminationCascadingCosts

1,480

524

301

2,305

2,305

4b.2.3 LicenseTerminationSurveyPlanning

1,948

584

2,532

2,532

12,480

4b.2.4 ContaminatedSoilRemoval

111

2

500

5,702

1,529

7,844

7,844

106,200

8,071,193

834

4b.2 SubtotalPeriod4bAdditionalCosts

4,169

2

500

7,289

3,883

3,666

19,509

10,376

9,133

125,721

10,649,710

834

12,480

Period4bCollateralCosts 4b.3.1 Processdecommissioningwaterwaste 15

18

47

85

38

202

202

250

14,985

49

4b.3.3 Smalltoolallowance

615

92

707

707

4b.3.4 DecommissioningEquipmentDisposition

155

49

127

44

53

427

427

6,000

635

305,961

88

4b.3 SubtotalPeriod4bCollateralCosts 15

615

172

96

127

129

182

1,336

1,336

6,000

885

320,946

137

Period4bPeriodDependentCosts 4b.4.1 Deconsupplies 1,124

281

1,404

1,404

4b.4.2 Insurance

850

85

935

935

4b.4.3 Propertytaxes

1,481

148

1,629

1,629

4b.4.4 Healthphysicssupplies

2,768

692

3,460

3,460

4b.4.5 Heavyequipmentrental

2,955

443

3,398

3,398

4b.4.6 DisposalofDAWgenerated

171

121

424

141

857

857

7,415

148,298

242

4b.4.7 Plantenergybudget

2,132

320

2,452

2,452

4b.4.8 NRCFees

1,063

106

1,170

1,170

4b.4.9 SiteO&MCosts

458

69

527

527

4b.4.10 LiquidRadwasteProcessingEquipment/Services

574

86

661

661

4b.4.11 SecurityStaffCost

5,378

807

6,185

6,185

96,607

4b.4.12 DOCStaffCost

17,703

2,655

20,358

20,358

207,126

4b.4.13 UtilityStaffCost

29,142

4,371

33,513

33,513

364,789

4b.4 SubtotalPeriod4bPeriodDependentCosts 1,124

5,722

171

121

424

58,782

10,205

76,548

76,548

7,415

148,298

242

668,521

4b.0 TOTALPERIOD4bCOST 7,398

36,922

2,876

4,388

4,696

13,301

62,664

26,465

158,711

147,791

9,133

1,787

245,206

224,659

27,572,740

481,970

681,001

PERIOD4fLicenseTermination Period4fDirectDecommissioningActivities 4f.1.1 ORISEconfirmatorysurvey

161

48

210

210

4f.1.2 Terminatelicense a

4f.1 SubtotalPeriod4fActivityCosts

161

48

210

210

Period4fAdditionalCosts 4f.2.1 LicenseTerminationSurvey

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

4f.2 SubtotalPeriod4fAdditionalCosts

8,201

2,460

10,661

10,661

118,801

6,240

Period4fCollateralCosts 4f.3.1 DOCstaffrelocationexpenses

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

4f.3 SubtotalPeriod4fCollateralCosts

1,124

169

1,292

1,292

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 16 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours Period4fPeriodDependentCosts 4f.4.2 Propertytaxes

753

75

828

828

4f.4.3 Healthphysicssupplies

802

201

1,003

1,003

4f.4.4 DisposalofDAWgenerated

8

6

20

7

41

41

351

7,025

11

4f.4.5 Plantenergybudget

289

43

332

332

4f.4.6 NRCFees

579

58

637

637

4f.4.7 SiteO&MCosts

233

35

268

268

4f.4.8 SecurityStaffCost

1,087

163

1,250

1,250

18,857

4f.4.9 DOCStaffCost

5,156

773

5,929

5,929

57,357

4f.4.10 UtilityStaffCost

6,703

1,005

7,708

7,708

74,643

4f.4 SubtotalPeriod4fPeriodDependentCosts

802

8

6

20

14,800

2,361

17,997

17,997

351

7,025

11

150,857

4f.0 TOTALPERIOD4fCOST

802

8

6

20

24,286

5,038

30,161

30,161

351

7,025

118,812

157,097

PERIOD4TOTALS 7,602

58,275

13,379

7,693

9,321

24,469

126,180 53,787

300,707

289,660

9,133

1,915

470,628

255,628

1,127

344

1,428

40,103,200

773,987

1,281,305

PERIOD5bSiteRestoration Period5bDirectDecommissioningActivities DemolitionofRemainingSiteBuildings 5b.1.1.1 Stack/ExhaustTunnelsRemove&Decon

1,019

153

1,172

1,172

1,665

5b.1.1.2 AdministrationBuilding

506

76

582

582

6,477

5b.1.1.3 AugmentedOffGasBuilding

338

51

388

388

3,399

5b.1.1.4 ChlorinationBuilding

32

5

36

36

407

5b.1.1.5 DieselGeneratorBuilding

137

21

157

157

1,268

5b.1.1.6 DilutionStructure

178

27

205

205

1,758

5b.1.1.7 DomesticWaterFacility

11

2

12

12

147

5b.1.1.8 FirePumpHouse

4

1

5

5

54

5b.1.1.9 FreshWaterPumpHouse

22

3

26

26

293

5b.1.1.10 HeatingBoilerHouse

41

6

48

48

546

5b.1.1.11 IntakeStructure

632

95

727

727

6,322

5b.1.1.12 LowLevelRadwasteStorage

444

67

511

511

5,435

5b.1.1.13 MachineShop

226

34

260

260

2,858

5b.1.1.14 MainGateSecurity

101

15

116

116

1,059

5b.1.1.15 MaintenanceBuilding

326

49

375

375

4,274

5b.1.1.16 MaterialsWarehouse

879

132

1,011

1,011

8,908

5b.1.1.17 MiscellaneousStructures

617

93

710

710

6,565

5b.1.1.18 NewRadwasteBuilding

745

112

857

857

8,009

5b.1.1.19 NewSamplePumpHouse

9

1

11

11

128

5b.1.1.20 OfficeBuilding

374

56

430

430

4,459

5b.1.1.21 OldRadwasteBuilding

680

102

782

782

6,852

5b.1.1.22 PlantEngineering

170

25

195

195

1,784

5b.1.1.23 PretreatmentBuilding

31

5

35

35

420

5b.1.1.24 ReactorBuilding

6,127

919

7,046

7,046

61,454

5b.1.1.25 SamplePool

15

2

18

18

180

5b.1.1.26 SecurityModifications

1,256

188

1,444

1,444

10,330

5b.1.1.27 SiteEmergencyBuilding

316

47

363

363

3,285

5b.1.1.28 TankPads&Misc.Yard

772

116

887

887

8,326

5b.1.1.29 TurbineBuilding

4,209

631

4,840

4,840

41,424

5b.1.1.30 TurbinePedestal

574

86

660

660

5,050

5b.1.1 Totals

20,789

3,118

23,908

23,908

203,134

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 17 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours SiteCloseoutActivities 5b.1.2 RemoveRubble

798

120

917

917

4,211

5b.1.3 Grade&landscapesite

634

95

729

729

1,304

5b.1.4 FinalreporttoNRC

187

28

215

215

1,560

5b.1 SubtotalPeriod5bActivityCosts

22,221

187

3,361

25,769

215

25,554

208,649

1,560

Period5bAdditionalCosts 5b.2.1 ConcreteCrushing

756

9

115

880

880

3,219

5b.2.2 InstallCofferdamsIntake&Dilution

975

146

1,122

1,122

8,296

5b.2.3 ISFSISiteRestoration

144

6

22

172

172

5b.2 SubtotalPeriod5bAdditionalCosts

1,875

15

284

2,174

172

2,002

11,516

Period5bCollateralCosts 5b.3.1 Smalltoolallowance

265

40

305

305

5b.3 SubtotalPeriod5bCollateralCosts

265

40

305

305

Period5bPeriodDependentCosts 5b.4.2 Propertytaxes

1,552

155

1,708

1,708

5b.4.3 Heavyequipmentrental

4,438

666

5,104

5,104

5b.4.4 Plantenergybudget

298

45

343

343

5b.4.5 SiteO&MCost

480

72

552

552

5b.4.6 SecurityStaffCost

2,242

336

2,578

2,578

38,880

5b.4.7 DOCStaffCost

10,204

1,531

11,735

11,735

110,160

5b.4.8 UtilityStaffCost

5,737

861

6,598

6,598

63,180

5b.4 SubtotalPeriod5bPeriodDependentCosts

4,438

20,514

3,665

28,617

28,617

212,220

5b.0 TOTALPERIOD5bCOST

28,799

20,716

7,350

56,865

215

172

56,478

220,165

213,780

PERIOD5TOTALS

28,799

20,716

7,350

56,865

215

172

56,478

220,165

213,780

TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSION 16,345

110,088

13,794

10,132

10,077

29,059

766,001 160,818

1,116,314

873,828

183,117

59,369

470,956

314,989

1,127

344

1,428

44,296,250

1,262,856

6,773,869

TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Decommissioning Cost Analysis Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Appendix E, Page 18 of 18 Table E Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2011 dollars)

Costs run: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 07:28:09 Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /

Utility and Activity DECCER Version 2010.09.09a Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.

Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Activity Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.

Manhours Manhours TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSIONWITH16.83%CONTINGENCY:

$1,116,314 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALNRCLICENSETERMINATIONCOSTIS78.28%OR:

$873,828 thousandsof2011dollars SPENTFUELMANAGEMENTCOSTIS16.4%OR:

$183,117 thousandsof2011dollars NONNUCLEARDEMOLITIONCOSTIS5.32%OR:

$59,369 thousandsof2011dollars TOTALLOWLEVELRADIOACTIVEWASTEVOLUMEBURIED(EXCLUDINGGTCC):

316,460 cubicfeet TOTALGREATERTHANCLASSCRADWASTEVOLUMEGENERATED:

1,428 cubicfeet TOTALSCRAPMETALREMOVED:

24,292 tons TOTALCRAFTLABORREQUIREMENTS:

1,262,856 manhours EndNotes:

n/aindicatesthatthisactivitynotchargedasdecommissioningexpense.

aindicatesthatthisactivityperformedbydecommissioningstaff.

0indicatesthatthisvalueislessthan0.5butisnonzero.

acellcontaining""indicatesazerovalue TLG Services, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 1 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX F WORK DIFFICULTY FACTOR ADJUSTMENTS

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 2 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GUIDELINES FOR APPLYING WORK DURATION ADJUSTMENT FACTORS TLG has historically applied work duration adjustment factors in determining unit cost factors to account for working in a radiologically controlled environment. In performing an area-by-area decommissioning estimate, the work duration factors are applied on an area basis based on the nominal area conditions. Where practical, areas are established based on similar working conditions.

The WDFs fall into five categories: access, respiratory protection, ALARA, protective clothing (PC), and work breaks. The guidelines of how these factors are assessed for each area is described below. Table F-1 details the WDFs used for each of the seven unit cost factor sets contained in the estimates. Table F-2 outlines the unit cost factors used for each area of the Oyster Creek plant.

1)

Access Factor:

Controlling Variables:

Height of the component above the working floor Difficulty in working around the component (restricted access)

Source of Variable Information:

Estimators observation or judgment Plant drawings Range of Access Factor Adjustments:

0% - Components are accessible and located near a working level floor or platform 10% - Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the area around the components is congested.

20% - Scaffolding (component less than <12 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components and the area around the components is congested.

30% - Scaffolding (component between 12 - 20 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components or the area around the components are extremely congested.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 3 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

40% - Scaffolding (component between 20 - 45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).

50% - Scaffolding (component greater than 45 feet above floor) is required to access the majority of the components).

2)

Respiratory Protection Factor:

Controlling Variables:

Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)

Type of work (potential to create an airborne problem)

General area surface contamination levels Site specific requirements for maintaining respirator qualifications (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)

Personal air sampler requirements Sources of Variable Information:

Radiation Work Permit Requirements Area Survey Maps Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Respiratory Protection Factor Adjustments:

0% - Respiratory protection is not required (clean system or loose surface contamination has been removed).

25% - Respiratory protection is only required during limited segments of the work (i.e., physical cutting) 50% - Respiratory protection is continuously required while working on the component.

3)

Radiation/ALARA Factor:

Controlling Variables:

Component contact dose rate General area dose rate Site specific requirements for maintaining radiation worker qualification (initial qualification, requalification, etc.)

Dosimetry requirements Sources of Variable Information:

Area Survey Maps Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Radiation Work Permit Requirements

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 4 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

Range of Radiation/ALARA Factor Adjustments:

(Note that surface contamination levels are principally accounted for in protective clothing requirements and respiratory protection requirements) 0% - The component is clean and is not located in a radiologically controlled area 10% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field < 2.5 mrem/hr).

20% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 2. 5 to 15 mrem/hr).

40% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field between 16 and 99 mrem/hr).

100% - The component is located in a radiologically controlled area (General Area Radiation field > 100 mrem/hr).

4)

Protective Clothing Factor:

Controlling Variables:

Component surface contamination levels (internal or external)

General area surface contamination levels Type of activity (wet/dry work, potential to create a surface contamination problem)

Site specific work schedule arrangements Sources of Variable Information:

Radiation Work Permit Requirements Area Survey Maps Site Radiation Protection Program Manual Range of Protective Clothing Factor Adjustments (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments):

0% - The component is clean and is not located in a radiologically controlled area.

30% - The component is clean or contaminated and is located in a surface contamination controlled area. Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies a single or double set of PCs, or PCs with plastics.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 5 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

50% - The components is located in a surface contamination controlled area.

Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies plastics in addition to double PCs for protective clothing.

100% - The component is located in a surface contamination controlled area.

Work is to be completed in accordance with the requirements of an RWP, which specifies double PCs and double plastics. (extremely wet or humid working environment).

5)

Work Break Factor:

Controlling Variables:

Site specific work schedule arrangements Sources of Variable Information:

Typical site work schedule Range of Work Break Factor Adjustments:

8.33% - Workday schedule outlined in AIF/NESP-036 (alternate site-specific schedules may dictate alternate adjustments).

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 6 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-1 UNIT COST FACTOR SETS AND THEIR WORK DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS DECON / Clean DECON / Contaminated Percentage Percentage UCF Set ID Access Resp.

PCs ALARA Access Resp.

PCs ALARA 1

10 0

0 10 10 0

0 10 2

20 0

30 10 20 0

30 10 3

20 25 30 30 20 25 30 30 4

30 25 50 30 30 25 50 30 5

50 25 50 40 50 25 50 40 6

30 25 50 100 30 25 50 100 7

20 0

0 0

20 25 30 30 SAFSTOR / Clean SAFSTOR / Contaminated Percentage Percentage UCF Set ID Access Resp.

PCs ALARA Access Resp.

PCs ALARA 1

10 0

0 10 10 0

0 10 2

20 0

30 10 20 0

30 10 3

20 25 30 10 20 25 30 10 4

30 25 50 10 30 25 50 10 5

50 25 50 10 50 25 50 10 6

30 25 50 10 30 25 50 10 7

20 0

0 0

20 25 30 10

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 7 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Drywell System Components IAA DRYWELL RECIRC LOOP 5

IAC DRYWELL EL. 13 - SUB PILE ROOM 5

ICA DRYWELL EL. 51 & 75' 5

IEA DRYWELL EL. 95 4

RC6 DRYWELL LABRYNTH 3

Reactor Building System Components RB1 REACTOR BUILDING - 19' GENERAL 3

RBB 19' NE 3

RBC 19' SE 3

RBE CRD SYSTEM PUMP ROOM 3

RBF REACTOR BUILDING EQUIPMENT DRAIN TANK ROOM 3

RBO 19' INSIDE TORUS 4

RBS TOP OF TORUS SEGMENT N/E 4

RBSW REACTOR BUILDING SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2

RC1 SOUTHEAST AIRLOCK 3

RC7 SW RAD MONITOR ENCLOSURE 2

RCA NORTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME 3

RCB LAUNDRY & LAB DRAIN TANKS/PUMPS 3

RCD NORTH BANK HCU's 3

RCG NORTH CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERS 3

RCJ CRD SYSTEM FILTER/VALVING AREA 3

RCM SOUTH BANK CSS HEAT EXCHANGERS 3

RCN SOUTH BANK CONTROL ROD DRIVE MODULES 3

RCS SOUTH SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (RCS15VM) 3 RCT REACTOR BUILDING EL.23 ALL AREAS GENERAL 3

RD8 RX33' SHUTDOWN COOLING RM GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RDM TIP DRIVE ROOM WEST 3

REC CORE SPRAY BOOSTER PUMPS 3

REF SHUTDOWN COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM 1

REH NITROGEN COMPRESSOR AREA 3

REI REACTOR 51' TOOL CRIB 3

REL RBCCW HEAT EXCHANGER/PUMP AREA 3

REM SOUTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

REO CLEANUP SYSTEM HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM 4

REQ CLEANUP SYSTEM PUMP AREA 3

RER CLEANUP SYSTEM VALVE NEST EL.64 5

RET CLEANUP FILTER SLUDGE PUMP HALLWAY 6

REW INSTRUMENT RACK RK01 3

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 8 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Reactor Building System Components (continued)

REX INSTRUMENT RACK RK02 AREA 3

REY REACTOR BUILDING 51' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RFB SOUTH EAST GENERAL AREA (C.U. SURGE TANK) 3 RFC RWCU VALVE AISLE AND CONTROL AREA 5

RFF CLEANUP SYSTEM FILTER AID/PRECOAT TANK AREA 3

RFH OLD FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGERS & PUMPS AREA 3

RFJ ASFP HEAT EXCHANGERS/PUMPS AREA 3

RFL CONTROL ROD DRIVE REBUILD ROOM 3

RFN EMERGENCY CONDENSER VALVE AREA 3

RFQ REACTOR BUILDING 75' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RGC NORTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

RGD "B" EMERGENCY CONDENSER NE01-B 3

RGI SOUTHEAST ACCESS AREA 3

RGL SOUTHWEST ACCESS AREA 3

RGP CLEANUP DEMINERALIZER VAULT (RGP16FM) 4 RGR LIQUID POISON TANK/PUMPS AREA 3

RGU REACTOR BUILDING EL.95 - GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

RH1 NORTH FLOOR AREA 3

RH2 WEST FLOOR AREA 3

RH3 RB EL119 ALL AREAS 3

RH4 REACTOR BUILDING CRANE 3

RH6 ELEVATOR CONTROL EQUIP AREA 3

RHA REACTOR CAVITY 6

RHJ CASK WASHDOWN / DECONTAMINATION AREA 3

RHL BRIDGE CRANE AND TRACKS 3

RHX SOUTH FLOOR AREA 3

RHY SOUTH EAST FLOOR AREA 3

RMCC REACTOR BUILDING MCC ROOM 2

New Radwaste Building System Components 7EB NRW TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 5

N2G NRW BUILDING GENERAL ALL ELEVATIONS 3

N2P NRW BUILDING PENTHOUSE 3

N38 NRW 23' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N3A NRW TRUCK BAY 3

N3D NEW RADWASTE FILL AISLE 4

N3I NRW #2 SUMP ROOM 4

N3N NRW SOUTH OPERATING GALLERY EAST 4

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 9 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET New Radwaste Building System Components (continued)

N3P NRW HIGH PURITY PUMP ROOM 3

N3Q NRW WC-P-1B WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM 3

N3R NRW VALVE AREA WEST 3

N3S NRW WC-P-1A WASTE CHEM PUMP ROOM 4

N3T NRW #1 SUMP ROOM 4

N3U NRW CONCENTRATOR SKID ROOM 'A' 4

N3W NRW CONCENTRATOR SKID ROOM 'B' 4

N3Y NRW HEAT EXCHANGER BUILDING 3

N48 NRW 38' GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N4A NRW 'A' HOLD-UP TANK SL-T-3A ROOM 5

N4B B' HOLD-UP TANK SL-T-3B ROOM 5

N4D LARGE CONTAINER FILL SKID ROOM SL-Y-6 4

N4E NRW LARGE CONTAINER FILL SKID ROOM 3

N4F CLW PROCESS AREA 4

N4H SPENT RESIN TRANSFER PIPING 4

N4K NRW SPENT RESIN VALVE GALLERY 4

N4L PIPE GALLERY WEST 4

N51 NRW HP-D-1A DEMINERALIZER ROOM 5

N52 NRW HP-F-2A RESIN TRAP ROOM 5

N53 NRW HP-D-1B DEMINERALIZER ROOM 5

N54 NRW HP-F-2B RESIN TRAP ROOM 5

N55 NRW MEZZANINE/VALVING AREA 4

N56 NRW 48-0 ELEVATION GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

N5A NRW "A" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-1A 5 N5B NRW "B" CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE TANK ROOM SL-T-1B 5 N5C NRW CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM 1A 4

N5D NRW HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM 1A 4

N5E NRW CHEMICAL WASTE FILTER ROOM 1B 4

N5F NRW HIGH PURITY FILTER ROOM 1B 4

N5G NRW CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP SL-P-1A ROOM 5

N5H NRW VALVE GALLERY EAST 4

N5I NRW CONCENTRATED LIQUID WASTE PUMP SL-P-1B ROOM 5

N5J NRW SAMPLE SINK AREA 3

N5K NRW NEUTRALIZATION FEED SKID AREA 3

N5N NRW LAUNDRY/DECON AREA 3

N5O NRW FILTER PRECOAT/BODY FEED ROOM 3

N5P NRW SL-T-2A SPENT RESIN TANK 5

N5Q NRW SL-T-2B SPENT RESIN TANK 5

N5R NRW CONTROL ROOM 3

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 10 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET New Radwaste Building System Components (continued)

N5S NRW BUILDING HVAC ROOM 3

N5T NRW CHEM WASTE/FLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1A 5

N5U NRW CHEM WASTE/FLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1B 5

N5V NRW CHEM WASTE/FLR DRAIN TANK ROOM WC-T-1C 5

N5W NRW CRANE BAY-STORAGE/LAYDOWN ROOM 3

N5X NRW HIGH PURITY TANK & ROOM 1A 5

N5Y NRW WC-D-1A DEMISTER ROOM 5

N5Z NRW WC-D-1B DEMISTER ROOM 5

PAA OLD RADWASTE BUILDING GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

Old Radwaste Building System Components 7BA 1-12 SUMP AREA GENERAL 4

7DA ORW TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 4

7FA ORW AIR FILTER ROOM 5

PBA ORW SMALL PUMP ROOM 5

PDA ORW 35' & 45' CENTRIFUGE AND HOPPER 5

PMA ORW OVERBOARD DISCHARGE MONITOR 3

PRA ORW ROOF GENERAL ALL AREAS 4

PRD ORW FUEL POOL FILTERS / KELLY BUILDING 4

PSB ORW CONTROL ROOM OPERATION AREA 3

PTA ORW COMPACTOR AREA 3

PTK ORW - NORTH ANNEX 3

PTP DRUM STORAGE AREA GENERAL 3

PUA ORW LARGE PUMP ROOM 4

PUU ORW INSIDE TANK ROOM GENERAL 4

PVA ORW NORTH ANNEX KELLY BUILDING 2

UAB ORW OUTSIDE TANKS & MOAT AREA 4

UAS ORW SURGE TANK & PUMP AREA 4

ORW ORW PRE D&D DESLUDGE AND DECON 4

Turbine Building System Components 7CA TURBINE TUNNEL GENERAL ALL AREAS 5

TB2 TURBINE BUILDING BASEMENT GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

TB23 TB23 HALLWAY AREA 1

TB38 TB38 HALLWAY AREA 1

TC2 CONDENSER BAY OVERHEAD GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

TD2 CONDENSER BAY DRAIN TANK PIT 3

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 11 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Turbine Building System Components (continued)

TE2 SPARE EXCITER GENERAL ALL AREAS 2

TEE 4160 VOLT ROOM 3

TEG RCA EXIT 1

TF2 FEED PUMP ROOM GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

TFG OFF GAS SAMPLE AREA 3

TG2 CONDENSATE PUMP PIT 3

TH2 HEATER BAY AREA 3

TKA TB EAST AND WEST PASSAGEWAY 2

TL2 HI-LO CONDUCTIVITY ROOM 3

TMA MECHANICAL VACUUM PUMP ROOM 3

TN2 TB BASEMENT NORTH 3

TO2 OPERATING FLOOR 3

TOA HEATER BAY ROOF 3

TOCR/DCA TURBINE BUILDING CONTROL ROOM 1

TOR TURBINE BYPASS VALVE AREA 3

TOV CONTAMINATED INSTRUMENT SHOP EL.55-4 2

TOW EL.46-6 WEST ROOF AREA 3

TOX TURBINE RAGEMS II BUILDING 3

TOY TURBINE REPAIR OFFICE 3

TP2 CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER AREA 3

TP3 CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER TANK ROOM 4

TPE REGEN TANK ROOM ENTRANCE AREA 3

TS2 STEAM JET AIR EJECTOR ROOM 3

TTA TRUNNION ROOM GENERAL ALL AREAS 4

TU2 TB NORTH MEZZANINE 3

Augmented Offgas System Components AY8 AOG NORTH ACCESS AREA (AYFOGZI) 3 AYA RECOMBINER ROOM 'A' 3

AYB RECOMBINER ROOM 'B' 3

AYC CHARCOAL ADSORBER ROOM 3

AYE AOG PIPE TUNNEL & SUMP AREA 4

AZ8 REFRIGERATION EQOT AREA ALL AREAS 3

AZA HEPA FILTER ROOM 'A' 3

AZC AOG CONTROL ROOM AREA 3

AZD WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #1 ROOM 3

AZE WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #2 ROOM 3

AZF WATER REMOVAL TRAIN #3 ROOM 3

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix F, Page 12 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

TABLE F-2 OYSTER CREEK STN DESIGNATIONS AND ASSOCIATED UNIT COST FACTORS (continued)

AREA AREA DESCRIPTION UCF SET Augmented Offgas System Components (continued)

AZI AOG BUILDING HVAC ROOM 3

Miscellaneous System Components BAA BOILER HOUSE ALL AREAS 3

BBA STACK ALL AREAS 3

BDA RAGEMS I BUILDING 3

CAA CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK 3

DAA CHEMISTRY LA GENERAL ALL AREAS 3

DAC CABLE SPREADING ROOM EL.36-0 3

DGB DIESEL GENERATOR #1 & #2 W/ STORAGE TANK 1

DOT DIRTY OIL TANK 1

DPH14-6 DILUTION PUMP HOUSE 1

DPH6-0 DILUTION PUMP HOUSE 1

DWF DOMESTIC WATER FACILITY 1

FWP FRESH WATER PUMP HOUSE 1

GAA NORTH GUARD HOUSE AND PARKING LOT 1

GCA MAIN GATE SECURITY BUILDING AND PARKING LOT 1

MAA NMB ;HOT MACHINE SHOP 3

MBA NMB RWP OFFICE 2

MBS NMB HOT TOOL ROOM 2

MBT RESP MAINT FACILITY 2

MS23-6 MACHINE SHOP 1

MS34-6 HEALTH PHYSICS STORAGE AREA 1

MSROOF MACHINE SHOP ROOF 1

NMBROOF HOT MACHINE SHOP ROOF AREA 1

OB35-0 OFFICE BUILDING A/B BATTERY ROOM 1

OB46-6 OFFICE BUILDING 1

OBROOF OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 1

PTB23-6 PRETREATMENT BLDG 1

RSFROOF SERVICE HEAD ROOF 2

WAA LLRWSF 2

WHS CONTROL ROOM 1

YDA DRYWELL PROCESSING FACILITY 2

YFA YARD LAUNDRY TRAILER 2

YLA YARD RADWASTE SHIPPING CENTER 2

INTAKE STR INTAKE STRUCTURE 1

UYARD YARD 2

YARD AREAS YARD AREAS 1

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 1 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

APPENDIX G WORK AREA DESIGNATION GPU SURVEY TRACKING NUMBER (STN) INDEX

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 2 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 3 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 4 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 5 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 6 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 7 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 8 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 9 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 10 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 11 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Document E16-1640-002, Rev. 4 Decommissioning Cost Analysis Appendix G, Page 12 of 12 TLG Services, Inc.

GPU STN INDEX (continued)

ATTACHMENT 2 SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Spent Fuel Management Plan December 30, 2014 Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT 2 SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

=

Background===

Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) provided notice of its intention to permanently terminate operations at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS) on December 31, 2019, pursuant to an Administrative Consent Order between Exelon and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection dated December 9, 2010.

A preliminary decommissioning cost estimate that evaluates three options for decommissioning OCNGS has been prepared. For the purpose of demonstrating the adequacy of funding to meet regulatory requirements, the SAFSTOR decommissioning option has been selected. This Spent Fuel Management Plan is similarly based on the SAFSTOR analysis, although the discussion below includes all three decommissioning options. Exelon has not made a final determination of the decommissioning approach for OCNGS. Exelon reserves the right to choose the ultimate decommissioning option in accordance with its business needs, recognizing that it needs to assure the chosen option meets U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements for decommissioning funding assurance.

There is an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) on the OCNGS site operating under a NRC general license.

Spent Fuel Management Strategy The NRC requires (as discussed in 10 CFR 50.54(bb)) that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor until title to the irradiated fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy for its ultimate disposal in a repository.

Pending transfer of the fuel to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Exelon will store fuel on an interim basis in the storage pool and/or the ISFSI located at the OCNGS site.

A licensed ISFSI is currently operational at OCNGS. For the DECON and SAFSTOR scenarios, the ISFSI facility will be expanded to accommodate the inventory of spent fuel in the spent fuel pool at the conclusion of the required cooling period. Once the spent fuel pool is emptied of fuel, the reactor building can be either decontaminated and dismantled or prepared for long-term storage. In the delayed DECON scenario, the spent fuel pool and the existing ISFSI facility would remain operational and used for the interim storage of the fuel until such time as the DOE takes title and possession of the fuel. The balance of the facility will be placed in a SAFSTOR condition. In all three decommissioning scenarios, the existing ISFSI will continue to operate until such time of the transfer of spent fuel to the DOE is complete.

Assuming that the DOEs generator allocation/receipt schedules are based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority and that the DOE begins removing spent fuel from commercial facilities in 2025 with an annual capacity of 3,000 metric tons of uranium, spent fuel is projected to remain at the OCNGS site for approximately 17 years after the termination of operations Spent Fuel Management Plan December 30, 2014 Page 2 of 3 (spent fuel is projected to be removed from the OCNGS site by the end of 2036). Any delay in transfer of fuel to DOE or decrease in the rate of acceptance will correspondingly prolong the transfer process and result in spent fuel remaining at the site longer than anticipated.

Operation and maintenance costs for the storage facilities (ISFSI and spent fuel pool) are reflected in the cost estimate and include the costs for staffing the facilities, maintenance of necessary operational requirements as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. The estimate includes the costs to purchase, load, and transfer the fuel storage canisters to the ISFSI and to decommission the ISFSI for each decommissioning scenario.

A discussion of site-specific considerations for the management of spent fuel at OCNGS under each decommissioning scenario may be found in Section 3.4.1 of the Decommissioning Cost Estimate Report.

When OCNGS terminates operations in 2019, OCNGS will continue to comply with existing NRC licensing requirements, including the operation and maintenance of the systems and structures needed to support continued operation of the OCNGS spent fuel pool and ISFSI, as necessary, under the decommissioning scenario ultimately selected. In addition, OCNGS will also comply with applicable license termination requirements in accordance with 10 CFR 50.82, Termination of license, with respect to plant shutdown and post-shutdown activities, including seeking NRC approvals as appropriate for the continued storage of irradiated fuel until transfer of the fuel to the DOE is complete.

Cost Estimate and Funding For Spent Fuel Management Based on the SAFSTOR Decommissioning Option Annual costs for spent fuel management under the SAFSTOR scenario range from approximately $3.3 million to $26.9 million with a total cost of $188.5 million (2014 dollars).

As of November 30, 2014, the OCNGS decommissioning trust fund balance was $869.9 million.

At this time, there are no annual contributions to the fund and none are anticipated through the decommissioning period. To the extent that the trust fund balance exceeds costs required for radiological decommissioning, trust fund monies (subject to receipt of an exemption), in conjunction with EGC operating revenues, will be used to pay for spent fuel management costs.

An additional potential source of funding for OCNGS spent fuel management costs is the Settlement Agreement between Exelon and the DOE, under which the United States Government has agreed to reimburse Exelon for costs incurred attributable to DOEs failure to meet its contractual obligations for the transfer of spent fuel from OCNGS and other Exelon nuclear plants (Reference A).

NRC Approvals This Spent Fuel Management Plan contemplates potential withdrawals from the decommissioning trust for spent fuel management purposes. Prior to any such withdrawals, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, Specific exemptions, Exelon will make appropriate submittals seeking an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A) in order to use the decommissioning trust funds for spent fuel management expenses. Exelon will monitor the funding level of the decommissioning fund to ensure that spent fuel management withdrawals will not inhibit the ability of Exelon to complete radiological decommissioning.

Spent Fuel Management Plan December 30, 2014 Page 3 of 3 References A. Settlement Agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and Exelon Generation Company, LLC (including Commonwealth Edison Company and AmerGen Energy Company), signed and executed August 5, 2004, as amended by the Addendum to the Settlement Agreement signed May 4, 2009.

ATTACHMENT 3 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING COST CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Decommissioning Cost Cash Flow December 30, 2014 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 3 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING COST CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (thousands of 2014 dollars)

Year Radiological Decommissioning Cost Spent Fuel Management Cost ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Site Restoration Cost Total Cost(a) 2019(b) 176 59 0

0 236 2020 65,146 21,625 0

0 86,771 2021 62,592 21,073 0

0 83,665 2022 7,277 26,780 0

0 34,057 2023 7,277 26,780 0

0 34,057 2024 7,297 26,853 0

0 34,150 2025 7,204 14,931 0

0 22,135 2026 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2027 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2028 7,152 3,284 0

0 10,436 2029 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2030 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2031 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2032 7,152 3,284 0

0 10,436 2033 7,133 3,275 0

0 10,408 2034 7,133 3,890 0

0 11,023 2035 7,133 8,808 0

0 15,940 2036 7,152 8,808 0

0 15,960 2037 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2038 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2039 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2040 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2041 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2042 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2043 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2044 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2045 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2046 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2047 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2048 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2049 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2050 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2051 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2052 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2053 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2054 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 (a)Cash flows may not add due to rounding (b)2019 costs are for decommissioning planning Decommissioning Cost Cash Flow December 30, 2014 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 3 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING COST CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (thousands of 2014 dollars)

(Continued)

Year Radiological Decommissioning Cost Spent Fuel Management Cost ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Site Restoration Cost Total Cost(a) 2055 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2056 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2057 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2058 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2059 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2060 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2061 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2062 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2063 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2064 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2065 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2066 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2067 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2068 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2069 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2070 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2071 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2072 7,120 0

0 0

7,120 2073 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2074 7,100 0

0 0

7,100 2075 37,974 0

0 395 38,369 2076 103,487 0

0 675 104,162 2077 122,204 396 1,174 418 124,192 2078 106,601 1,663 4,924 1,289 114,477 2079 58,238 406 1,201 421 60,266 2080 148 119 0

38,976 39,243 2081 81 65 0

21,298 21,444 Totals(a) 934,208 188,471 7,299 63,471 1,193,450 (a)Cash flows may not add due to rounding

ATTACHMENT 4 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING FUND CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Decommissioning Fund Cash Flow December 30, 2014 Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 4 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING FUND CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (thousands of dollars)

Year Total Cost(a)

(2014 dollars)

BOY Trust Fund Value BOY Trust Fund Less Cost Trust Fund Earnings(c)

EOY Trust Fund Value(b) 2019(d) 236 960,460 960,224 1,600 961,825 2020 86,771 961,825 875,054 17,501 892,555 2021 83,665 892,555 808,890 16,178 825,068 2022 34,057 825,068 791,011 15,820 806,831 2023 34,057 806,831 772,775 15,455 788,230 2024 34,150 788,230 754,080 15,082 769,162 2025 22,135 769,162 747,027 14,941 761,967 2026 10,408 761,967 751,559 15,031 766,591 2027 10,408 766,591 756,183 15,124 771,306 2028 10,436 771,306 760,870 15,217 776,087 2029 10,408 776,087 765,679 15,314 780,993 2030 10,408 780,993 770,585 15,412 785,997 2031 10,408 785,997 775,589 15,512 791,101 2032 10,436 791,101 780,664 15,613 796,278 2033 10,408 796,278 785,870 15,717 801,587 2034 11,023 801,587 790,564 15,811 806,376 2035 15,940 806,376 790,435 15,809 806,244 2036 15,960 806,244 790,284 15,806 806,090 2037 7,100 806,090 798,989 15,980 814,969 2038 7,100 814,969 807,869 16,157 824,026 2039 7,100 824,026 816,926 16,339 833,265 2040 7,120 833,265 826,145 16,523 842,668 2041 7,100 842,668 835,568 16,711 852,279 2042 7,100 852,279 845,179 16,904 862,082 2043 7,100 862,082 854,982 17,100 872,082 2044 7,120 872,082 864,962 17,299 882,261 2045 7,100 882,261 875,161 17,503 892,664 2046 7,100 892,664 885,564 17,711 903,275 2047 7,100 903,275 896,175 17,924 914,099 2048 7,120 914,099 906,979 18,140 925,119 2049 7,100 925,119 918,018 18,360 936,379 2050 7,100 936,379 929,278 18,586 947,864 2051 7,100 947,864 940,764 18,815 959,579 2052 7,120 959,579 952,459 19,049 971,509 2053 7,100 971,509 964,408 19,288 983,697 2054 7,100 983,697 976,596 19,532 996,128 (a) Annual SAFSTOR decommissioning cost (radiological + spent fuel + ISFSI decommissioning + site restoration)

(b) Cash flows may not add due to rounding (c) A 2% annual real rate of return is used as allowed by 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)

(d) The 2019 BOY Trust Fund Value is the value of the decommissioning trust prior to the 2019 decommissioning planning expenses Decommissioning Fund Cash Flow December 30, 2014 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 4 ANNUAL SAFSTOR DECOMMISSIONING FUND CASH FLOW FOR OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (thousands of dollars)

(Continued)

Year Total Cost(a)

(2014 dollars)

BOY Trust Fund Value BOY Trust Fund Less Cost Trust Fund Earnings(c)

EOY Trust Fund Value(b) 2055 7,100 996,128 989,028 19,781 1,008,809 2056 7,120 1,008,809 1,001,689 20,034 1,021,723 2057 7,100 1,021,723 1,014,622 20,292 1,034,915 2058 7,100 1,034,915 1,027,815 20,556 1,048,371 2059 7,100 1,048,371 1,041,271 20,825 1,062,096 2060 7,120 1,062,096 1,054,976 21,100 1,076,076 2061 7,100 1,076,076 1,068,976 21,380 1,090,355 2062 7,100 1,090,355 1,083,255 21,665 1,104,920 2063 7,100 1,104,920 1,097,820 21,956 1,119,776 2064 7,120 1,119,776 1,112,657 22,253 1,134,910 2065 7,100 1,134,910 1,127,810 22,556 1,150,366 2066 7,100 1,150,366 1,143,265 22,865 1,166,131 2067 7,100 1,166,131 1,159,031 23,181 1,182,211 2068 7,120 1,182,211 1,175,091 23,502 1,198,593 2069 7,100 1,198,593 1,191,493 23,830 1,215,323 2070 7,100 1,215,323 1,208,223 24,164 1,232,387 2071 7,100 1,232,387 1,225,287 24,506 1,249,793 2072 7,120 1,249,793 1,242,673 24,853 1,267,526 2073 7,100 1,267,526 1,260,426 25,209 1,285,635 2074 7,100 1,285,635 1,278,535 25,571 1,304,105 2075 38,369 1,304,105 1,265,736 25,315 1,291,051 2076 104,162 1,291,051 1,186,889 23,738 1,210,626 2077 124,192 1,210,626 1,086,435 21,729 1,108,163 2078 114,477 1,108,163 993,686 19,874 1,013,560 2079 60,266 1,013,560 953,294 19,066 972,360 2080 39,243 972,360 933,117 18,662 951,780 2081 21,444 951,780 930,336 18,607 948,942 Total(b) 1,193,450 (a) Annual SAFSTOR decommissioning cost (radiological + spent fuel + ISFSI decommissioning + site restoration)

(b) Cash flows may not add due to rounding (c) A 2% annual real rate of return is used as allowed by 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(i)