LR-N13-0094, 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, January 1 to December 31, 2012

2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, January 1 to December 31, 2012

ML13128A271
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/29/2013
From:	Carr E, Wagner L Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LR-N13-0094
Download: ML13128A271 (117)

Text

PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0 PSEG Nuclear LLC Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.7 (Salem)

Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.6 (Hope Creek)

APR'2 9 2013 LR-N13-0094 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354 Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. land 2 Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-70 and DPR-75 NRC Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Subject:

2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report As required by Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to the Operating License NPF-57 for Hope Creek Generating Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the combined 2012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. This report summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2012 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result of this program for 2012 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this correspondence.

Document Control Desk LR-N13-0094 If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Jeffrey Pantazes at (856) 339-7900.

Sincerely, Eric S. Carr Lawrence M. Wagner Plant Manager - Hope Creek Plant Manager - Salem 012 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Page 2 of 3

Document Control Desk LR-N 13-0094 cc: Mr. W. Dean, Administrator- Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 Mr. Jeffrey Whited, Project Manager Salem & Hope Creek U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North Mail Stop 8B1A Washington, DC 20555-0001 Mr. Ronald L. Nimitz, NRC Inspector - Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2100 Renaissance Blvd., Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Hope Creek (X24)

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Salem (X24)

Mr. P. Mulligan, Manager New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection P.O. Box 420 MC 33-01 33 Arctic Parkway Trenton, NJ 08625 Ms. J. Chomiszak Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977 Hope Creek Commitment Coordinator (H02) w/o Attachment Salem Commitment Coordinator (X25) w/o Attachment Corporate Commitment Coordinator (N21) w/o Attachment Page 3 of 3

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM & HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2012 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31,2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Sum m ary .......................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Radiological Environm ental Monitoring Program ................................................. 3 A. O bjectives of the O perational REM P ............................................................... 5 B. Implem entation of the O bjectives ................................................................... 5 Ill. Program Description .................................................................................................. 6 A. Data Interpretation .......................................................................................... 6 B. Program Exceptions ........................................................................................ 8 C . Program Changes .......................................................................... ..................... 9 D. Q uality Assurance Program .......................................................................... 10 E. Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program ..................... 10 IV. Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 13 A . Atm ospheric .................................................................................................. 14

1. Air Particulates .................................................................................... 14

2. Air Iodine ............................................................................................. 15 B. Direct Radiation ............................................................................................. 16 C . Terrestrial ..................................................................................................... 17

1. Milk ...................................................................................................... 18

2. W ell W ater (G round W ater) ............................................................... 19

3. Potable W ater (Drinking W ater) ........................................................ 20

4. Vegetables ........................................................................................ 22

5. Fodder Crops ...................................................................................... 23

6. Soil ...................................................................................................... 24

7. Beef and G am e ................................................................................. 24 D. Aquatic ............................................................................................................... 25

1. Surface W ater .................................................................................... 26

2. Fish ................................................................................................... 28

3. Blue Crab .......................................................................................... 28

4. Sedim ent ............................................................................................. 29 E. Land Use Survey .......................................................................................... 31 V. Annotations to Previous AREO R ............................................................................. 32 VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations.. 34 VII. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 34 VIII. References ................................................................................................................ 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Appendix A - Program Sum m ary ................................................................................ A-1 Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations ..................................................... B-1 Appendix C - Data Tables .......................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Summary of Results from Analytics, Environmental Resource Associates and DOE MAPEP Interlaboratory Comparison Programs ....... D-1 LIST OF TABLES Table B-1 S am pling Locations ..................................................................................... B -3 Table B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations'- Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ........................................................ B-5 LIST OF DATA TABLES Table C-1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air P articulates, 20 12 ............................................................................. . . C -1 Table C-2 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates, 2012 ...... C-3 Table C-3 Concentrations of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air, 2012 .............................. C-4 Table C-4 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly Dosimetry Results, 2012 .... C-5 Table C-5 Concentrations of Iodine-1 31 and Gamma Emitters in Milk, 2012 ..... C-6 Table C-6 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Well W ate r, 20 12 ....................................................................................... . . C -8 Table C-7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water, 2012 ..................... C-9 Table C-8 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3), 2012 ............................................. C-10 Table C-9 Concentrations of Iodine-1 31 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable W ater (2F3), 2012 .................................................................. 0C-11 Table C-10 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables, 2012 .................... C-12 Table C-11 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops, 2012 .................... C-14 Table C-12 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil, 2012 ................................ C-15 LIST OF TABLES (cont'd)

Table C-13 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Beef and Game, 2012 ................. C-16 Table C-14 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Surface Water, 2012 ....... C-17 Table C-15 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water, 2012 ............................... C-18 Table C-16 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water, 2012 ................... C-19 Table C-17 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish, 2012 ......................... C-22 Table C-18 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs, 2012 ................................. C-23 Table C-19 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment, 2012 ........................... C-24 LIST OF MAPS Map B-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-Site Sampling Locations ........ B-10 Map B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations ........ B-i 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates 1990 through 2012 (Q uarterly) ................................................................. C-25 Figure 2 Ambient Radiation - Off-site vs Control Station 1990 through 2012 (Q uarterly) ................................................................ C-26 Iodine-1 31 Activity in Milk Figure 3 1990 through 2012 (Q uarterly) ................................................................. C-27 Figure 4 Gross Beta Activity in Surface Water 1990 through 2012 (Quarterly) ................................................................. C-28 Figure 5 Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1990 through 2012 (Quarterly) ................................................................ C-29 Figure 6 Cesium-1 37 and Co-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment 1990 through 2012 (Quarterly) ................................................................. C-30 Figure 7 Cesium-1 37 Activity in Soil 1974 through 2012 (Triennial) ...................... C-31

1. Summary During normal operations of a nuclear power generating station there are permitted releases of small amounts of radioactive material to the environment. To monitor and determine the effects of these releases a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been established around the Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS). The results of the REMP are published annually, providing a summary and interpretation of the data collected [10].

Public Service Enterprise Group's (PSEG) Maplewood Testing Services (MTS) was responsible for the collection of environmental samples during 2012. Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) was responsible for the analysis of environmental samples during 2012. The results are discussed in this report. Landauer provided the dosimetry services for PSEG through the first half of the reporting year 2012 and Mirion Technologies provided dosimetry services through the last half of the reporting year 2012.

The REMP was conducted in accordance with the SGS and HCGS' Technical Specifications (TS) and the respective station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) [14, 15, 17, 21]. The Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) values required by the Technical Specifications and SGS and HCGS' ODCM were achieved for the 2012 reporting period. The REMP objectives were also met during this period. The data that was collected in 2012 assists in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS' were operated in compliance with Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM.

Most of the radioactive materials noted in this report are normally present in the environment either naturally such as K-40, or as a result of non-nuclear generating station activity, such as nuclear weapons testing. Measurements made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS were compared to background or control measurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before Salem Unit 1 became operational.

Samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface, ground and potable (drinking) water, vegetables, fodder crops, fish, crabs and sediment were collected and analyzed. External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using passive dosimeters.

To demonstrate compliance with Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM (Sections 3/4.12.1 & 6.8.4.h -1,2,3) [14,15], samples were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-1 31 (1-131), gross alpha and gross beta. The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact of SGS and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM (Section 3/4.11), applicable Federal and State regulations [19,20,21] and to verify the adequacy of radioactive effluent control systems.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Salem and Hope Creek stations operations was only a small fraction of the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity. Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program [7,8,9], and combined with historical results collected since commercial operation [10], it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations were as expected for an estuarine environment and the operation of SGS and HCGS had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

The results provided in this report for the REMP are summarized below:

There were a total of 1506 analyses on 1170 environmental samples during 2012. Of the total number of analyses and environmental samples, direct radiation dose measurements were made using 195 sets of direct reading dosimeters In addition to the naturally - occurring isotopes (i.e. Be-7, K-40, Ra-Nat and Th-232),

Cesium-1 37 was detected on the vegetables in one of the on-site gardens.

Soil samples obtained from this garden had similar concentrations of Cs-1 37, up to 200 pCi/kg, which is the typical concentration found in soil as the result of atmospheric nuclear bomb testing. Since there have not been any releases of gaseous cesium from either Salem or Hope Creek, the data indicates that the soil contaminated the broadleaf vegetation. The on-site gardens are encased in small boxes to prevent animals from foraging.

These planting boxes were flooded during Hurricane Sandy. The samples are not washed and were reported as being covered by significant quantities of dirt. The maximum bounding dose from the contamination would be 0.40 mrem assuming that an individual consumed 26 kg of the vegetation.

Dose measurements made with quarterly passive dosimeters at offsite locations around the SGS/HCGS site averaged 62 milliroentgen for the year 2012. The average of the dose measurements at the control locations (background) was slightly less at 61 milliroentgen for the year. This was comparable to the levels prior to station operation which had an average of 55 milliroentgen per year for 1973 to 1976.

Following the guidance in Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI) 07-07, the results of the annual report of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP), which was formerly reported in this report, has been moved to the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report.

I1. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey is the site of SGS and HCGS. Salem Generating Station consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors. Salem Unit One has a net rating of 1180 megawatt electric (MWe) and Salem Unit Two has a net rating of 1178 MWe. The licensed core power for both units is 3460 megawatt thermal (MWt). Hope Creek Generating Station is a boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1216 MWe (3840 MWt).

Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS) are located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River. It was created by the deposition of hydraulic fill from dredging operations. The environment surrounding SGS/HCGS is characterized mainly by the Delaware River Estuary and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands. These land types make up approximately 85% of the land area within five miles of the site. Most of the remaining land is used for agriculture [1,2]. More specific information on the demography, hydrology, meteorology, and land use of the area may be found in the Environmental Reports [1,2], Environmental Statements [3,4], and the Updated Final Safety Analysis Reports for SGS and HCGS [5,6].

Since 1968, a radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) has been conducted at the SGS/HCGS Site [22]. Starting in December 1972, more extensive radiological monitoring programs were initiated [7,8,9]. The operational REMP was initiated in December 1976, when Salem Unit 1 achieved criticality.

An overview of the 2012 REMP is provided in Table 1, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results from the preoperational phase and historical results during operations. Differences between these periods were examined statistically to determine the effects of station operations. This report presents the results from January 1 through December 31, 2012, for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

A. Objectives of the Operational REMP The objectives of the Operational REMP are to:

1. To fulfill the requirements of the Radiological Surveillance sections of the Technical Specifications and the SGS and HCGS' ODCMs.

2. To determine whether any significant increase occurred in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.

3. To determine if SGS or HCGS has caused an increase in the radioactive inventory of long-lived radionuclides.

4. To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

5. To verify that SGS and HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

B. Implementation of the Objectives

1. In order to meet the objectives, an operational REMP was developed. Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose impact to human and other organisms. The selection of samples was based on:

(a), established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, and (b) experience gained during the preoperational phase.

Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware River Bay estuarine hydrology, local demography, and land uses.

2. Sampling locations were divided into two classes, indicator and control. Indicator stations are those which are expected to manifest station effects. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations, usually at 15 to 30 kilometers (9.3 to 18.6 miles) away from the generating stations. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations. Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

3. Appendix A, Program Summary, describes and summarizes the analytical results in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of the Salem Technical Specifications and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope Creek Technical Specifications [25,26,27].

4. Appendix B, Sample Designation, describes the coding system which identifies sample type and location. Table B-1 On-site Sampling Locations lists the station codes, locations, latitude, longitude, and the types of samples collected at each station.

5. The sampling locations are indicated on Maps B-i, Onsite Sampling Locations and B-2, Offsite Sampling Locations.

Ill. Program Description A. Data Interpretation Results of analyses are grouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. All results above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) are at a confidence level of +/- 2 sigma. This represents the range of values into which 95% of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall. As defined in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 4.8, LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95% probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal". LLD is normally calculated as 4.66 times the standard deviation of the background counting rate, or of the blank sample count, as appropriate, divided by counting efficiency, sample size, 2.22 (dpm per picocurie), the radiochemical yield when applicable, the radioactive decay constant and the elapsed time between sample collection and time of counting. The LLD is an "a priori" number which represents the capability of the measurement system.

The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material that can be detected at a given confidence level. The MDC differs from the LLD in that the MDC takes into consideration the interference caused by the presence of other nuclides while the LLD does not. The MDC is an "a posteriori" number which is an indicator of the performance of the measurement system. The MDC is set to be below the LLD.

The grouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated in accordance with Appendix B of Reference 16. Thus, the + 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability. For reporting and calculation of averages, any result occurring at or below the LLD is considered to be at that level.

B. Program Exceptions The dosimetry at location SA-IDM-2F2 was missing during the quarterly exchange. Its replacement was moved around the corner to a nearby location, less susceptible to vandalism. The dosimeters have not been located, so there are no 4 th quarter dosimetry results for this location.

When the beef farmer was contacted in September for the annual 2012 survey, he stated that he had some frozen meat samples from the spring. Because of the age of the sample, the LLD for the 1-131 could not be met.

Due to an incorrect setting on gamma detector 08, 3.29 rather than 4.66 was used in the MDC calculation. Nonconformance 13-07 was initiated and corrective actions have been implemented to address this issue. All samples counted on detector 08 were reprocessed using the correct calculation. As a result, all MDCs for these samples have increased by 41.6%. The previously reported activities and uncertainties were not affected. In some cases, the increased MDC resulted in missed LLDs. All samples with MDCs affected by this issue are listed below. The samples with missed BaLa-140 LLDs are shown in the table. All other required LLDs were met.

START BALA-140 CLIENT ID DATE END DATE MATRIX REQUIRED REVISED MDC MDC SA-FPB-3E1 04/01/12 04/01/12 animal 2Q12 SA-APT-14G1 04/02/12 07/02/12 air particulate 4Q12 SA-APT-5S1 10/01/12 01/02/13 air particulate SA-FPL-15S1 12/13/12 12/13/12 food product SA-FPL-15S1 12/13/12 12/13/12 vegetables SA-FPV-2F9 07/23/12 07/23/12 vegetables SA-FPV-1 G1 07/23/12 07/23/12 vegetables SA-FPV-3H5 07/31/12 07/31/12 vegetables SA-MLK-14F4 01/02/12 01/03/12 milk <15 <15.2.

SA-MLK-3G1 02/05/12 02/06/12 milk SA-MLK-13E3 04/15/12 04/16/12 milk <15 <15.5 SA-MLK-3G1 05/06/12 05/07/12 milk SA-MLK-14F4 05/21/12 05/21/12 milk SA-MLK-3G1 07/08/12 07/09/12 milk SA-MLK-3G1 08/05/12 08/06/12 milk SA-MLK-14F4 09/09/12 09/10/12 milk <15 <18.8 SA-MLK-14F4 10/31/12 11/01/12 milk <15 <19.9 SA-MLK-13E3 11/11/12 11/12/12 milk SA-MLK-13E3 11/25/12 11/26/12 milk <15 <17.9 SA-MLK-14F4 12/09/12 12/10/12 milk SA-PWR-2F3 03/01/12 03/31/12 potable water raw SA-PWR-2F3 04/01/12 04/30/12 potable water raw SA-PWR-2F3 05/01/12 05/31/12 potable water raw SA-PWR-2F3 06/01/12 06/30/12 potable water raw SA-PWR-2F3 07/01/12 07/31/12 potable water raw SA-PWR-2F3 08/01/12 08/31/12 potable water raw SA-PWT-2F3 10/01/12 10/31/12 potable wate treated SA-WWA-3E1 10/24/12 10/24/12 groundwater SA-SWA-11A1 03/06/12 03/06/12 surface water <15 <15.4 SA-SWA-16F1 05/11/12 05/11/12 surface water SA-SWA-1 F2 07/03/12 07/03/12 surface water <15 <16.9 SA-SWA-16F1 08/06/12 08/06/12 surface water SA-SWA-16F1 09/06/12 09/06/12 surface water SA-SWA-16F1 10/01/12 10101112 surface water SA-SWA-1F2 11/06/12 11/06/12 surface water <15 <19.49 C. Program Changes The area monitor dosimetry vendor was changed from Landauer to Mirion Technologies in July 2012. The new vendor uses a Thermoluminescent Dosimeter (TLD). The direct radiation readings are now portrayed as mRad/standard quarter instead of the previous mRad/standard month to align with the draft of the ANSI N545 standard.

D. Quality Assurance Program Teledyne Brown Engineering The quality of the results obtained by TBE is ensured by the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Teledyne Brown Engineering Quality Assurance Manual [11 d] and the Teledyne Brown Engineering Procedure Manual [11e].

E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program The testing laboratory analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate, for 18 analytes. (Appendix D, Tables D-1 through D-3 The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and Department of Energy's (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following acceptance criteria:

1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of reported result and Analytics' known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Environmental Laboratory Conference (NELAC) performance testing (PT) program requirements or ERA's standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

Teledyne Brown Engineerinq For the TBE laboratory, 12 out of 18 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analytes (Co-60, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Sr-89, Sr-90 and Zn-65) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reason:

1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2012 Co-60 in soil result of 7.61 Bq/kg was higher than the known value of 1.56 Bq/kg, resulting in a found to known ratio of 4.88 on a sensitivity evaluation. Nonconformance report (NCR) 12-08 was initiated to investigate this failure. No cause could be found for the failure. TBE is monitoring the Co-60 in soil analyses on a case-to-case basis.

2. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP March 2012 Zn-65 in air particulate result of 4.19 Bq/sample was higher than the known value of 2.99 Bq/sample, exceeding the upper control limit of 3.89 Bq/sample. NCR 12-08 was initiated to investigate this failure. No cause could be found for the failure and is considered an anomaly specific to the MAPEP sample. The first and second quarter 2012 Analytics air particulate Zn-65 analyses were acceptable.

3. Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September 2012 Sr-90 in water result of 19.6 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 12.2 pCi/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 15.9 pCi/L.

NCR 12-11 was initiated to investigate this failure. An incorrect aliquot was entered into Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Using the correct aliquot, the result would have fallen within the acceptance range.

4. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA May 2012 Gross Alpha in water result of 82.4 pCi/L' was higher than the known value of 62.9 pCi/L, which exceeded the upper control limit of 78.0 pCi/L. Nonconformance report 12-05 was initiated to investigate this failure. The G-1 detector is slightly biased high for Th-230 based measurements. The G-1 detector is used only for ERA samples. The detector was recalibrated.

5. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2012 Gross Beta in water result of 59.3 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 39.2 pCi/L, which exceeded the upper control limit of 46.7 pCi/L. Nonconformance report 12-13 was initiated to investigate this failure. The rerun result of 44.8 fell within the control limits. It appears an incorrect aliquot was entered into LIMS.

6. Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA November 2012 Sr-89 in water result of 46.5 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 39.1 pCi/L, which exceeded the upper control limit of 46.1 pCi/L. Nonconformance report 12-13 was initiated to investigate this failure. The found to known ratio was 1.19, which TBE considers acceptable with warning.

IV. Results and Discussion The analytical results of the 2012 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct radiation, terrestrial, and aquatic. The analytical results for the 2012 REMP are summarized in Appendix A, Program Summary. The data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. The data are compared to the formal pre-operational environmental monitoring program data (1973-1976) and to historical data during operations. The data collected demonstrates that the SGS and HCGS' REMP was conducted in compliance with the Technical Specifications and SGS AND HOGS' ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required by the Stations' Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM. These analyses are referenced throughout the report as Management Audit samples. Maplewood Testing Services continues to collect these samples. The summary tables in this report include these additional samples and analyses.

These Management Audit Samples are samples that are taken to augment the radiological effluent monitoring program, but do not have a regulatory basis nor do they fulfill any regulatory requirement. The regulatory guidance governing the sampling program is sometimes quite specific: in some cases, the pathway to be analyzed does not exist, such as the sampling food products that are irrigated by the plant effluent. There is not any irrigation that is performed using the liquid effluents from either Salem or Hope Creek, therefore, there is not a potential exposure pathway to absorb radioactive material through the plant roots and subsequent consumption. The following is a list and quantity of the Management audit samples:

Food Crops (12)

Milk samples (2)

Well water (1)

Potable water (2)

Fodder crops (4)

Soil (9)

Beef and Game (2), dependent upon availability A. Atmospheric Air particulates were collected on Schleicher-Schuell No. 25 glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers.

Iodine was collected from the air by adsorption on triethylene-diamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridges connected in series after the air particulate filters. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters. The displayed volumes were corrected to standard temperature and pressure.

1. Air Particulates Air particulate samples were collected weekly at six indicator locations and one control location. Each of the samples collected for the year were analyzed for gross beta. Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each station were analyzed for specific gamma emitters.

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 313 of 318 of the indicator station samples collected at concentrations ranging from 5 to 46 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 14 E-3 pCi/m 3, and in 52 of 53 of the control station samples at concentrations ranging from 6 to 24 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average of 15 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 920 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 74 E-3 pCi/m 3 .

(Table C-2, Appendix C) [Figure 1 - Results for gross beta analysis from 1990 to current year are plotted as quarterly averages, with an inset depicting the period 1973 to 2012].

Gamma Spectrometry Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 24 quarterly composite samples.

Beryllium-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 23 of 24 indicator station composites at concentrations ranging from 38.1 E-3 to 102 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 61.0 E-3 pCi/m 3 , and in the four control station composites ranging in concentration from 38.1 to 61.6 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 52.9 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The maximum preoperational level detected was 330 E-3 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 109 E-3 pCi/m 3 .

(Table C-I, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

2. Air Iodine Filtered air iodine samples were collected weekly at six indicator locations and one duplicate location. Each of the samples collected for the year was analyzed for 1-131.

Iodine-131 lodine-131 was not detected in any indicator station samples or control station samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 42 E-3 pCi/m 3 . (Table C-3, Appendix C)

B. Direct Radiation Ambient radiation levels in the environs were measured with a pair of optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters supplied and processed by Landauer. Packets containing OSLs for quarterly exposure were placed in the owner-controlled area and around the Site at various distances and in each land based meteorological sector. Emphasis was placed on special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools.

In July, the OSL dosimeters were replaced with Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) provided by Mirion Technologies.

A total of 51 locations were monitored for direct radiation during 2012, including 14 on-site locations, 31 off-site locations within the 10 mile zone and six control locations beyond 10 miles.

Each location has a set of two OSL dosimeters packaged together.

The pair uses aluminum oxide technology. In July the replacement TLDs were composed of two calcium sulfate (CaSO4)

Thermoluminescent phosphors and two Lithium Fluoride phosphors enclosed in plastic.

The average dose rate for the 31 quarterly off-site and 14 quarterly on-site indicator dose rate was 16.4 milliroentgen per standard quarter. The average control dose rate was 16.4 milliroentgen per standard quarter.

The preoperational average for the quarterly TLD readings was 4.4 milliroentgen per standard month. The results of the direct radiation measurements for 2012 confirmed that the radiation levels in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations were similar to previous years. (Table C-4, Appendix C) [Figure 2 - The quarterly average radiation levels of the off-site indicator stations versus the control stations are plotted for the period 1990 through 2012, with an inset graph depicting the period 1973 to 2012.]

C. Terrestrial Terrestrial REMP sampling includes the collection of milk, well water, potable water, vegetation, fodder crop and soil samples.

Milk samples were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture. Animals are considered on pasture from April to November of each year.

Samples were collected in new polyethylene containers and transported in ice chests with no preservatives added to the milk.

One well water sample was collected monthly. Separate raw and treated potable water samples were composited daily at the City of Salem Water and Sewer Department. All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetables were collected at the time of harvest at 12 locations, fodder crops and broad leaf vegetation at 4 locations. The vegetables and fodder samples are additional samples (Management Audit) taken to enhance the radiological monitoring program. There is no dairy farm within three miles of SGS and HCGS and there is only one dairy within 5 miles. Therefore, broadleaf vegetation is grown, maintained and harvested by MTS personnel in the late summer and early fall. All samples were weighted, packaged and shipped to TBE for analysis.

Milk Milk samples were collected at four local dairy farms (two farms in NJ and two in Delaware). Each sample was analyzed for I-131 and gamma emitters.

Iodine-131 Iodine-i 31 Was not"detected above minimum detectable concentration in any of the 80 samples analyzed. The maximum preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L, which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. (Table C-5, Appendix C) [Figure 3 - results from 1990 to 2012 are plotted as quarterly averages, with an inset graph depicting the period 1973 to 2012.]

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 80 samples with concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranging from 1,090 to 1,563 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,342 pCi/L, and the 20 control station sample concentrations ranging from 1,088 to 1,473 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 1,367 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,000 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,437 pCi/L.

(Table C-5, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

2. Well Water (Ground Water)

Although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly affected by plant operations, water samples were collected monthly from one farm's well (3E1). This well is located up gradient of the stations aquifer. Samples from this well are considered Management Audit samples.

Gross Alpha Gross alpha activity was detected above the minimum detectable concentration in one of 12 well water samples at a concentration of 3.0 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.6 pCi/L. (Table C-6, Appendix C)

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in one of 12 well water samples, at a concentration of 2.7 pCi/L. As with the 2011 gross beta results, the 2012 results are lower than the preoperational results which ranged from <2.1 to 38 pCi/L, with an average value of 9 pCi/L. The downward trend may be attributed to the REMP participant installing a water treatment system for this well in February, 2009. (Table C-6, Appendix C)

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected above the minimum detectable concentration in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L. (Table C-6, Appendix C)

Gamma Spectrometry Potassium-40 was detected in one of the 12 well water samples at a concentration of 54 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 30 pCi/L.

Radium (Natural) was not detected in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.0 pCi/L. (Table C-7, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and composited by The City of Salem Water and Sewer Department personnel. Each sample consisted of daily aliquots composited into a monthly sample. The raw water source for this plant is Laurel Lake and its adjacent wells. These are Management Audit samples as no liquid effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS directly affect this pathway.

Gross Alpha No gross alpha activity was detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L. (Table C-8, Appendix C)

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in eight of the 12 of the raw water samples and nine of the 12 treated water samples. The concentrations for the raw samples ranged from 2.2 to 4.4 pCi/L. Concentrations for the treated water ranged from 2.8 to 4.2 pCi/L. The average concentration for both raw and treated water was 3.5 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L with an average concentration of 4.2 pCi/L. (Table C-8, Appendix C)

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L with an average of 179 pCi/L. (Table C-8, Appendix C)

Iodine-1 31 Iodine-1 31 measurements were performed to an LLD of 1.0 pCi/L. Iodine-1 31 activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data is available for comparison since 1-131 was not analyzed as a specific nuclide until 1989. Since that time all results have been below the LLD.

(Table C-9, Appendix C)

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data is available for comparison.

Naturally occurring Radium (Natural) was not detected in any raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1.4 pCi/L. (Table C-9, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

4. Vegetables There are no farm products that are irrigated with water in which liquid plant effluents have been discharged.

A variety of food products are sampled from around the plant:

the variety is dependent on the farmer's preference. These vegetables are collected as Management Audit samples. In addition, broadleaf vegetation was grown by MTS personnel and planted at three on site lOcations and one offsite location in Delaware at 3.9 miles SSW.

These broad leaf vegetable samples are collected since there are no milk farms operating within the 5 km radius of SGS/HCGS. The closest milk farm (13E3) is located in Odessa, DE at 4.9 miles (7.88 km). All samples (vegetable and broadleaf) were analyzed for gamma emitters and included asparagus, cabbage, kale, sweet corn, peppers, and tomatoes.

These samples were from eight indicator stations (12 samples) and four control stations (13 samples). The results for these samples are discussed below.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in one of the 12 indicator station samples (cabbage) at a concentration of 267 pCi/kg wet. It was not detected in any of the control locations. No preoperational data is available for comparison.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 12 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 1,987 to 14,700 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 4,706 pCi/kg wet, and in all 13 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 2,017 to 2,459 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,279 pCi/kg wet. The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,140 pCi/kg wet. (Table C-10, Appendix C).

Cesium-1 37 was detected in one broadleaf sample at a concentration of 49.5 pCi/kg wet, which is below the SGS AND HCGS' ODCM LLD value of 80 pCi/kg wet. The results of this sample are discussed in the beginning summary section.

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

5. Fodder Crops Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM, four samples of silage normally used as cattle feed were collected from three indicator stations and one control station. It was determined that these products could be an element in the food-chain pathway. These fodder crops are collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters. All four locations from which samples were collected are milk sampling stations.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 96.1 to 154 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 124 pCi/kg wet, and in the control station sample at 49.3 pCi/kg wet. The maximum preoperational level detected for silage was 4,700 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,000 pCi/kg wet.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 2,412 to 3,851 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 3,205 pCi/kg wet, and in the control station sample at a concentration of 1,296 pCi/kg wet. Preoperational results averaged 7,000 pCi/kg wet. (Table C-11, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

6. Soil Soil is sampled every three years at nine stations, and analyzed for gamma emitters. These Management Audit samples were collected at two stations in areas that have been relatively undisturbed since the last collection in order to determine any change in the radionuclide inventory of the area.

(Table C-12, Appendix C)

Soil was sampled in 2010 and will be sampled again in 2013.

7. Beef and Game Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM, one muskrat sample and two cow samples were collected from two indicator stations. These beef and game samples are collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

When we contacted the farmer for the annual survey, he stated that he had some frozen meat samples from the spring.

Because of the age of the samples, the LLD for the 1-131 could not be met.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 2,230 to 3,020 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,615 pCi/kg wet.

Preoperational results averaged 7,000 pCi/kg wet. No preoperational data is available for comparison. (Table C-13, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

D. Aquatic Environmental Consulting Services, Inc (ECSI) collected all aquatic samples (with the exception of the 6S2 shoreline sediment). This sample set includes edible fish, shoreline and riverbed sediment, surface water and crab.

Surface water samples were collected offshore. The technicians collect the samples in new polyethylene containers that are rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to collection. The surface water samples are transported to TBE for analysis.

Edible fish are taken by gill nets while crabs are caught in commercial traps. These samples are then processed where the flesh is separated from the bone and shell. The flesh is placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

Sediment samples collected by ECSI were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests to TBE. For the river

- 25 -

bottom sediment, a marine GPS is used to locate the correct site and the sampling boat is maneuvered over the area until the correct amount of sample is obtained (grabbed) with the sediment dredge. Personnel from MTS collect and prepare the location 6S2 shoreline sediment sample (an onsite location). For this location, a square area, measuring one meter on each side is staked out and then divided into a grid of nine smaller boxes, three per side. A one inch deep scoop from the center of each of the small grids is taken. All the aliquots are combined and the total sample transported in the ice chest to TBE.

1. Surface Water Surface water samples were collected monthly at four indicator stations and one control station in the Delaware River Bay estuary. One location (1 1A1) is at the outfall area (which is the area where liquid radioactive effluents from the Salem Station are discharged into the Delaware River), one is downstream from the outfall area (7E1), and one is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River (12C1).

Two upstream locations are in the Delaware River (1 F2) and at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (16F1), the latter being sampled when the flow is from the Canal into the river.

Station 12C1, directly west, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the operational control. Location 12C1 was chosen as the control location because the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the farther upstream location (1 F2). As discussed in the pre-operational summary report, due to the tidal nature of this Delaware River Bay estuary, there are flow rate and salinity variations. These variations will account for differences in concentrations of potassium and associated gross beta from K-40.

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in all of the 48 indicator station samples with concentrations ranging from 16 to 235 pCi/L and an average concentration of 91 pCi/L, and in all 12 of the control station samples with concentrations ranging from 57 to 117 pCi/L and an average concentration of 87 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 110 pCi/L with an average concentration of 32 pCi/L. (Table C-14, Appendix C)

[Figure 4 - Quarterly results for all locations are plotted for the years 1990 to 2012, with an inset graph depicting the current period 1973 to 2012.]

Tritium Tritium activity was detected in one of 48 indicator samples with a concentration of 735 pCi/L, and was not detected in any of the control samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 600 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 210 pCi/L. There is no dose from this radioactive material because the exposure pathway is drinking water and the Delaware River is salt/brackish at this point. (Table C-15, Appendix C) [Figure 5 - Quarterly positive results from 1990 to 2012 are plotted, with an inset graph depicting the period 1973 to 2012.]

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in 12 of the 48 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 64 to 132 pCi/L with an average concentration of 102 pCi/L, and in two of the 12 control station samples with concentrations of 62 and 110 pCi/L and an average of 86 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected for K-40 was 200 pCi/L with an average concentration of 48 pCi/L. Iodine-1 31 was not detected in any of the 12 control station samples. (Table C-16, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

2. Fish Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at two indicator stations and one control station and analyzed for gamma emitters in edible flesh.

Samples included channel catfish, white catfish, bluefish, white perch, summer flounder, black drum and striped bass.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all four indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 4,364 to 4,924 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 4,602 pCi/kg wet, and both control station samples at concentrations of 3,278 and 3,485 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 3,382 pCi/kg wet. The maximum preoperational level detected was 13,000 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,900 pCi/kg wet.

(Table C-1 7, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

3. Blue Crab Blue crab samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control station. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both indicator station samples at concentrations of 2,639 and 2,650 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,645 pCi/kg wet, and in both control station samples at concentrations of 1,157 and 3,276 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,560 pCi/kg wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 12,000 pCi/kg wet with an average concentration of 2,835 pCi/kg wet. (Table C-1 8, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

4. Sediment Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from six indicator stations and one control station. Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment sample location and is directly subject to tidal fluctuations.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was not detected in any of the indicator or control samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,300 pCi/kg dry.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 2,537 to 20,380 pCi/kg dry, with an average concentration of 8,804 pCi/kg dry, and at both control stations samples at concentrations of 12,000 and 16,470 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 14,235 pCi/kg dry. The maximum preoperational level detected was 21,000 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 15,000 pCi/kg dry.

Cesium-1 37 was not detected in any of the indicator or control samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 150 pCi/kg dry.

(Figure 6 - Semi-annual positive results from 1990 to 2012 are plotted, with an inset graph depicting the current period 1977 to 2012.)

Naturally occurring Radium (Natural) was detected in four of the 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 1,240 to 3,101 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 1,853 pCi/kg dry, and at both control station samples at concentrations of 2,188 and 2,644 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 2,416 pCi/kg dry. The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1,200 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 760 pCi/kg dry.

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in four of the 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 147 to 1,243 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 628 pCi/kg dry, and in both of the control station samples at concentrations of 953 and 1,117 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 1,035 pCi/kg dry. The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1,300 pCi/kg dry with an average concentration of 840 pCi/kg dry. (Table C-19, Appendix C)

All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD.

E. Land Use Survey SYNOPSIS OF 2012 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted in each of the 16 meteorological sectors to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of greater than 50 m 2 (500 ft 2 ) producing broad leaf vegetation. In accordance with Salem and Hope Creek ODCMs the census was performed using a door to door survey, visual survey, Google Earth and by consulting with local agricultural authorities.

Milk Nearest Vegetable Animal Residence Garden Meteorological Sept, 2012 Sept, 2012 Sept, 2012 Sector Km (miles) Km (miles) Km (miles)

N None None None NNE None 8.0(5.0) None NE None 6.2 (3.9) None ENE None 6.2 (3.9) None E None None None ESE None None None SE None None None SSE None None None S None None None SSW None 6.2 (3.9) None SW None 6.9(4.3) 7.3(4.6)

WSW None 7.1 (4.4) 7.1 (4.4)

W 7.8(4.9) 6.5(4.0) None WNW None 5.5(3.4) None NW None 5.9(3.7) None NNW None 6.8(4.2) None The 2012 Land Use Census results are summarized in the above table. A comparison of the identified locations from the 2012 table with the 2011 table shows that there is no change: no new nearest milk animal, nearest resident, or nearest vegetable garden (>500 ft2 )

with broadleaf vegetation were identified. Therefore, no formal dose evaluation or changes to the SGS AND HCGS' ODCMs are required.

V. Annotations to Previous AREOR In the June 2009 REMP sampling effort, Mn-54 was detected at a concentration equal to 27 pCi/kg in a sediment sample from location 16A1. The direct external dose rate to a receptor assumed standing directly over sediment containing 27 pCi/kg Mn-54 was determined to be 6.7E-4 mrem. As a continuation of the initial evaluation for the Mn-54 in the sediment sample, an annual dose is estimated for comparison to the annual dose limit from liquid effluent (i.e., 3 mrem to the total body) and the results were 0.022% of the annual dose limit for liquid effluent.

Based on the information reviewed and evaluated during this effort, it is concluded that:

" The detected concentration of Mn-54 in the sediment sample was not due to liquid or gaseous effluent releases,

" The detected concentration of Mn-54 in the sediment sample cannot be linked to an onsite spill,

" The detected concentration of Mn-54 in the sediment sample was unreliable analytical data and was inappropriately reported as positive Mn-54 results in the 2009 AREOR. If the Mn-54 result had been present in the sample at its LLD level of 27 pCi/g, effluent results predict other gamma-emitting radionuclides released at similar quantities but having lower LLD values, such as Co-60, would have been released.

The positive 1-131 detected in the surface water sample for station 12C1 from April 7, 2011 was not from plant effluents. Iodine-1 31 was not detected in any of the plant effluents in 2011. As previously stated in the AREOR, the most likely source could be a discharge from a medical facility.

The Summary Table did not include the result for Barium and Lanthium-140 for Milk, Well Water and Potable Water samples. The results of these samples were below the detection limits.

Table C-5 The Milk table reported an incorrect 1-131 LLD of <2.4 pCi/L for the station SA-MLK-2G3 sample collected on 01/02/11. The actual value is <0.2 pCi/L.

The Milk table did not include the result for Barium and Lanthium-140.

The results of these samples were below the detection limits.

Table C-9 The Raw and Treated Potable Water table did not include the result for Barium and Lanthium-1 40. The results of these samples were below the detection limits.

Table C-16 The Fish table misidentified a fish Location. The correct location should be SA-ESF-7E1 instead of the reported SA-ESF-2G3.

Appendix A Airborne Particulate: The Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 were reversed; the correct LLDs are 50 pCi/L for cesium-134 and 60 pCi/L for Cesium-1 37.

The surface water station 1F2 was collected August 22, 2011 rather than on August 1, 2011. The original sample was lost in transit and retaken before the end of the month.

The 2011 AREOR discussion of the annual land use census states that there was no new nearest resident. However, in the NNE sector, there was a "new" identified resident within 5 miles. The change resulted from the use of the GPS system, which more accurately depicted the estimated miles. The resident was identified in the land use survey previously at 5.0 miles and after the GPS survey became 4.9 miles.

The 2011 AREOR included two samples, one air particulate location SA-APT-1 F and one potable water raw location SA-PWR-2F3, that had MDCs higher than what was reported. The MDCs had been calculated using an MDC multiplier of 3.29 instead of the required 4.66. Both samples were recalculated using the correct MDC multiplier of 4.66. All required LLDs were met.

VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations The Hope Creek primary water chemistry results for 2012 were reviewed.

The specific activity of the primary coolant did not exceed 0.2 microcuries per gram Dose Equivalent 1-131. Therefore, the iodine concentrations in the primary coolant did not exceed the Tech Spec limit specified in section 3.4.5.

VII. Conclusions The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations was conducted during 2012 in accordance with the SGS and HCGS Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM.

The LLD values required by the Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM were achieved for this reporting period (See Appendix A and Appendix C). The objectives of the program were also met during this period. The data collected assists in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with Technical Specifications and SGS AND HCGS' ODCM requirements.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to Salem and Hope Creek stations operations was only a small fraction of the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity. Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1973 to 1976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, PSEG Nuclear Personnel have concluded that the operation of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected for an estuarine environment.

VIII. References

[1] PSE&G. "Environmental Report, Operating License Stage - Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2".

1971.

[2] PSE&G. "Environmental Report, Operating License Stage - Hope Creek Generating Station". 1983.

[3] United States Atomic Energy Commission. "Final Environmental Statement -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2". Docket No. 50-272 and 50-311. 1973.

[4] United States Atomic Energy Commission. "Final Environmental Statement -

Hope Creek Generating Station", Docket No. 50-354. 1983.

[5] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Updated Final Safety Analysis Report - Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2".

[6] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Updated Final Safety Analysis Report - Hope Creek Generating Station.

[7] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Annual Reports 1973 through 1982".

[8] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preoperation Summary - 1973 through 1976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[9] Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - December 11 to December 31, 1976". RMC-TR-77-02, 1977.

[10] Maplewood Testing Services. "Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Annual Reports 1983 through 2010"..

[11a] Maplewood Testing Services. "Quality Assurance Manual." December 2009

[11 b] Maplewood Testing Services. Mechanical Division "Quality Assurance

/ Control Plan". December 2009.

[11 c] Maplewood Testing Services. Mechanical Division Environmental/Radiological Group "Procedures Manual". December 2011.

[1 Id] Teledyne Brown Engineering. "Quality Assurance Manual."

November 2011

[11e] Teledyne Brown Engineering "Procedure Manual 011312".

[12] PSE&G. "Salem Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-70, 1976, Sections 6.8.4.h - 1,2,3 and 6.9.1.7.

[13] PSE&G. "Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications",

Appendix A to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, 1986, Sections 6.8.4.h - 1,2,3 and 6.9.1.6.

[14] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"-

Salem Generating Station. Revision 26.

[15] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual"-

Hope Creek Generating Station. Revision 26.

[16] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. "Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water." EPA-600/4-80-032, August 1980.

[17] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. "Environmental Technical Specifications For Nuclear Power Plants." Regulatory Guide 4.8, December 1975.

[18] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: "NRC Inspection Manual".

Inspection Procedure 84750, Issue Date 3/15/94.

[19] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10 Part 20.1301 Standards for Protection Against Radiation.

[20] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10 Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion 64, Monitoring Radioactivity Releases.

[21] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Code of Federal Regulations, Titlel0, Part 50, Appendix I, "Numerical Guides for Design Objectives and Limiting Conditions for Operations to meet the Criterion 'As Low As Is Reasonably Achievable' for Radioactive Material in Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Reactor Effluents".

[22] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in the Environs of Nuclear Power Plants: Regulatory Guide 4.1, Rev. 1.

[23] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications, Regulatory Guide 4.13, Rev. 1.

[24] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations) Effluent Streams and Environment, Regulatory Guide 4.15, Rev. 1.

[25] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors, NUREG -1302, April 1991.

[26] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors, NUREG - 1301, April 1991.

[27] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979.

[28] NJDEP : "A South Jersey Homeowner's Guide to Radioactivity in Drinking Water: Radium" Revised April 2004.

[29] American Nuclear Standards Institute, ANSI N545-1975, Performance Testing and Procedural Specification for Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (Environmental).

APPENDIX A PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Intentionally left blank RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMITOF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS I. AIRBORNE AIR PARTICULATE Gr-B 371 10 14 (313/318) IFI 15 (52/53) 15 (52/53) 0 (E-3 pCi/rnv) (5/46) 5.8 MILES N (6/24) (6/24)

GAMMA 28 Be-7. NA 61.0 (23/24) 16EI 67 (4/4) 52.9 (4/4) 0 (38.1/102) 4.1 MILES NNW (38.1/102) (38.1/61.6)

K-40 NA <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 50 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA 371 (E-3 pCi/mn) 1-131 70 <LLD <LLD 0 II. DIRECT DIRECT RADIATION QUARTERLY 195 NA 15.4 (171/171) SA-IDM-IFI 19.3 (4/4) 15.4 (24/24) 0 (mR/standard month) BADGES (10.2/23.7) 5.8 MILES N OF SITE (17.4/20.5) (12.1/20.6)

III. TERRESTRIAL MILK 1-131 80 1 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/L)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS MILK (cont'd) GAMMA 80 (pCi/L) K-40 NA 1342 (60/60) 2G3 1367 (20/20) 1264 (20/20) 0 (1090/1563) 11.8 MILES NNE (1246/1561) (1088/1473)

Cs-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BaLa-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 WELL WATER Gr-A 12 3 3.0 (1/12) 3E1 3.0 (1/12) NA 0 (pCi/L) 4.2 MILES NE Gr-B 12 4 2.7 (1/12) 3El 2.7 (1/12) NA 0 4.2 MILES NE H-3 12 200 <LLD NA 0 GAMMA 12 K-40 NA 54(1112) 3EI 54 (1/12) NA 0 4.2 MILES NE

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS WELL WATER (cont'd) Mn-54 is <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

Co-58 <LLD NA 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD NA 0 Co-60 is <LLD NA 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD NA 0 ZrNb-95 15 <LLD NA 0 1-131 15 <LLD NA 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD NA 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD NA 0 BaLa- 140 15 <LLD NA 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUT1NE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS WELL WATER (cont'd) Ra-226 NA <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

POTABLE WATER Gr-A 24 3 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

Gr-B 24 4 3.5 (17/24) 2F3 3.5 (9/12) NA 0 (2.2/4.4) 8.0 MILES NNE (2.8/4.2) 4>

H-3 24 200 <LLD NA 0 GAMMA 24 K-40 NA <LLD NA 0 Mn-54 15 <LLD NA 0 Co-58 15 <LLD NA 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD NA 0 Co-60 15 <LLD NA Zn-65 30 <LLD NA 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd) ZrNb-95 15 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L) 1-131 15 <LLD NA 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD NA 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD NA 0 BaLa- 140 18 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA <LLD NA VEGETATION GAMMA 25 (pCi/kg wet) Be-7 NA 267 (1/12) IS1 267(1/1) <LLD 0 0.57 MILES N K-40 NA 4706 (12/12) 14F4 14700 (1/1) 2279 (13/13) 0 (1987/14700) 7.6 MILES WNW (2017/2459) 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION (cont'd) Cs- 137 80 49.5 (1/12) 15SI 49.5 (1/1) <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet) 0.57 MILES NW Ra-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 Th-232 NA <LLD <LLD 0

(ýVODDER CROPS GAMMA 4 (pCi/kg wet) Be-7 NA 124 (3/3) 14F4 154 (1/1) 49.3 (1/1) 0 (96.1/154) 7.6 MILES WNW K-40 NA 3205 (3/3) 13E3 3851 (I/I) 1296(1/1) 0 (2412/3851 ) 5.0 MILES W 1-131 60 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs- 137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA <LLD <LLD Th-232 NA <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS BEEF AND GAME GAMMA 3 (pCi/kg wet) Be-7 NA <LLD <LLD 0 K-40 NA 2615(3/3) SA-GAM-3E I 3020(1/1) NA (2320/3020) 1-131 NA <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 NA <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 NA <LLD <LLD 0 IV. AQUATIC SURFACE WATER Gr-B 60 4 91 (48/48) 7EI 134 (12/12) 87(12/12) 0 (pCi/L) (16/235) 4.5 MILES SE (26/235) (57/I 17)

H-3 60 200 735 (1/48) 7EI 735 (1/12) <LLD 0 4.5 MILES SE GAMMA 60 K-40 NA 102 (12/48) 7EI 111(6/12) 86(2/12) 0 (64/132) 4.5 MILES SE (90/124) (62/110)

Mn-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (cont'd) Co-58 15 <LLD <LLD (pCi/L)

Fe-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD <LLD 00 Zn-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 ZrNb-95 15 <LLD <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BaLa-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS FISH GAMMA 6 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 4602 (4/4) 7E I 4759 (2/2) 3382 (2/2) 0 (4364/4924) 4 5 MlIFFS qF (4594/4924) (3278/3485)

Mn-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Fe-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS BLUE CRABS GAMMA (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 2645 (2/2) IIAI 2645 (2/2) 2560 (3/3) 0 (2639/2650) 0.2 MILES SW (2639/2650) (1157/3276)

Mn-54 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Fe-59 260 <LLD <LLD 0 Co-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT GAMMA 14 (pCi/kg dry) Be-7 NA <LLD <LLD 0 K-40 NA 8804 (12/12) 16F1 18350 (2/2) 14235 (2/2) 0 (2537/20380) 6.9 MILES NNW (16320/20380) (12000/16470)

Cs-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0 Cs-137 180 <LLD <LLD 0 Ra-226 NA 1853 (4/12) 12C1 C 2416 (2/2.) 2416 (2/2) 0 (1240/3101) 2.5 MILES WSW (2188/2644) (2188/2644)

Th-232 NA 628 (4/12) 12C] C 1035 (2/2) 1035 (2/2) 0 (147/1243) 2.5 MILES WSW (953/I 117) (953/1117)

• LLD LISTED IS THE LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION WHICH WE ENDEAVORED TO ACHIEVE DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD.

• • MEAN CALCULATED USING VALUES ABOVE LLD ONLY. FRACTION OF MEASUREMENTS ABOVE LLD ARE IN PARENTHESES.

Intentionally left blank APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS

Intentionally left blank SAMPLE DESIGNATION The PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services identifies samples by a three part code. The first two letters are the program identification code. Because of the proximity of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations a common environmental surveillance program is being conducted. The identification code, "SA", has been applied to Salem and Hope Creek stations. The next three letters are for the media sampled.

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = Immersion Dose (TLD)

APT = Air Particulate MLK = Milk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Edible Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated)

ESS = Sediment SOL = Soil FPL = Green Leaf Vegetables SWA = Surface Water FPV = Vegetables (Various) VGT = Fodder Crops (Various)

GAM= Game (Muskrat) WWA= Well Water The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point. The reference point is located at the midpoint between the center of the Salem 1 and Salem 2 containments. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction as follows:

1=N 5=E 9=S 13 = W 2 =NNE 6 = ESE 10 = SSW 14 = WNW 3 =NE 7=SE 11 =SW 15= NW 4 = ENE 8 = SSE 12 = WSW 16 = NNW The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the reference point:

S = On-site location E = 4-5 miles off-site A = 0-1 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site H = >20 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g.,

1,2,3,...etc. For example, the designation SA-WWA-3E1 would indicate a sample in the Salem and Hope Creek program (SA), consisting of well water (WWA), which had been collected in sector number 3, centered at 45 degrees (north east) with respect to the midpoint between Salem 1 and 2 containments at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance E). The number 1 indicates that this is sampling station

1. 1 in that particular sector.

B-1

TABLE B-1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1. Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

STATIONC ODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. FT DEG. MIN. FT IS1 0.57mi. N 39 260 75 222 IDM,VGT 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE; Lamp Pole 65 Near HC Switch Yard 39-28-98 75 -32 - 10 IDM 2S4 0.6 mi. NNE 39 110 75 992 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE 39 140 75 678 IDM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE 39 023 75 544 IDM 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 39 668 75-31 -187 AIO,APT, IDM 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road, Duplicate sample 39 668 75 187 AIO, APT 6S2 0.23mi. ESE; area around Helicopter Pad 39-27-719 75-31 -912 IDM,SOL,ESS 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39-27-720 75 15 IDM 10SI 0.14 mi. SSW; inlet cooling water bldg. 39-27-700 75 -32 - 160 IDM 11S1 0.09 mi. SW; service water inlet bldg. 39-27-719 75 225 IDM 15S1 0.57 mi. NW 39 161 75-32-525 IDM,VGT 15S2 0.61 mi. NNW 39-28-12 75 - 32 - 32 IDM 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW 39 215 75 432 IDM,VGT 16S2 0.60 mi. N 39 16 75 - 32 - 17 IDM 11A1 0.2 mi. SW; outfall area 39 59 75-32-25 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 11A1A 0.15 mi. SE; Located at the plant barge slip 39-27-41 75 - 32 - 02 Alternate SWA 15A1 0.65 mi. NW; cooling tower blow down discharge line outfall 39-27-67 75 19 ESS 16A1 0.24 mi. NNW; south storm drain discharge line 39 24 75-32-58 ESS 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW; west bank of Delaware River 39 22 75-34-08 ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA 12CIA 3.7 mi. WSW; Located at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat Ramp 39-30-17 75 - 34 - 48 Alternate SWA 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39 292 75 - 28 - 175 IDM 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm 39-28-396 75-28-334 AIO,APT, IDM 1OD1 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur 39-24-613 75 733 IDM,SOL,VGT 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW; Bay View, Delaware 39-29-26 75 521 IDM

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. FT DEG. MIN. FT 15D1 3.8 mi NW; Rt. 9, Augustine Beach 39 125 75-35-28 IDM 2E1 4.4 mi. NNE; local farm 39-31 -380 75-30-428 IDM 3E1 4.2 mi. NE; local farm 39-30-098 75-28-646 IDM,WWA 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; 1 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39-25-08 75-28-64 ESF, ESS,SWA 7E1A 8.87 mi. SE; Located at the end of Bayside Road 39-22-57 75 - 24 - 24 Alternate SWA 11E2 5.0 mi. SW; Rt. 9 39-24-328 75-35-546 IDM 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas Landing 39-26-862 75-36 - 968 IDM 13E1 4.2 mi. W; Silver Run Road (Rt. 9) 39-27-989 75-36-735 IDM 13E3 5.0 mi. W; Local Farm, Odessa, DE 39-27-17 75 - 37-30 MLK,VGT,SOL 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 39-30-762 75-34 - 580 AIO,APT,IDM,SOL 1F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg 39-32 - 693 75 124 AIO,APT, IDM IF2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware River 39 08 75-32-54 SWA 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Pole at Corner of 5th & Howell, Salem 39-34-522 75-28-120 IDM 2F3 8.0 mi. NNE; Salem Water Company 39-33-40 75-27-18 PWR,PWT 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School 39-33-448 75-28-514 IDM 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; Southern Training Center 39-33-713 75-28-819 AIOAPT, IDM 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm, Tilbury Rd, Salem 39-33-55 75-29-30 FPV,FPL,SOL 2F10 9.2 mi. NNE; Local Farm, South Broadway (Rt. 49) Pennsville 39-35-35 75-29-35 FPV,FPL 3F2 5.1 mi. NE;Hancocks Bridge Municipal Bid 39-30-410 75-27-578 IDM 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township School 39-32 -616 75-24 - 735 IDM 3F6 6.5 mi. NE; Local Farm, Salem/Hancocks Bridge Road 39-32-03 75-28-00 FPV,FPL 3F7 7.2 mi. NE; Local Farm, Beasley Neck Road, RD#3 39-32-07 75-25 -46 FPV,FPL 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville 39-29-953 75-26-076 IDM 5F1 6.5 mi. E; Canton 39-28-360 75-25-031 IDM,SOL 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road 39-26 - 396 75-25-148 IDM 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, New Jersey 39-22-971 75-24-261 IDM 9F1 5.3 mi. S; D.P.A.L. 48912-30217 39 - 23 - 042 75-32-95 IDM 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Rt. 9 39-23-034 75-34-152 IDM 11F1 6.2 mi. SW; Taylor's Bridge Delaware 39-24-766 75-37-632 IDM 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School 39-23-778 75-41 -311 IDM

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL SAMPLE TYPE DEG. MIN. FT DEG. MIN. FT 13F2 6.5 mi W; Odessa, Delaware 39 297 75-39-372 IDM 13F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School, Middletown, Delaware 39 215 75 543 IDM 13F4 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, Delaware 39-26-857 75-43-111 IDM 14F2 6.7 mi. WNW; Boyds Corner 39 979 75-39-042 IDM 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW; local farm 39 44 75 52 MLK,VGT,SOL 15F3 5.4 mi. NW 39-30-987 75-36-586 IDM 15F4 7.0 mi. NW; local farm; Port Penn Road; Delaware 39-31 -21 75-38-31 FPV 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 39-33-55 75 25 ESS,SWA 16F1A 6.84 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal tip 39-33-34 75 - 33 - 56 Alternate SWA 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School 39-34-314 75 429 IDM 1G1 10.9 mi. NNE; Rte. 49, South Broadway 39-37-113 75 - 30 - 178 FPV 1G3 19 mi. N; N. Church St. Wilmington, Del (Old Swedish Church Yard Park) 39-44-287 75 512 IDM 2G2 13.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm; Pointers Auburn Road (Rt. 540), Salem, NJ 08079 39 19 75 10 FPV 2G3 11.8 mi. NNE; Local Milk Farm, Corner of Routes 540 & 45, Mannington, NJ 39-36-21 75-24-53 MLK,FPV,VGT,SOL 2G4 11.3 mi. NNE; large family garden; Rt 45 & Welchville Rd,Mannington, NJ 39-36-02 75-25-21 FPV 3G1 16.5 mi. NE; Milk Farm; Daretown-Alloway Road, Woodstown 39-35-913 75 804 IDM,MLK,VGT,SOL 9G1 10.3 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Rd., Smyrna, Delaware 39-18-47 75-33-50 FPV 9G2 10.7 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road, Smyrna, Delaware 39-18-39 75 - 34 - 11 FPV,FPL 10G1 12 mi. SSW; Smyrna, Delaware 39-18-223 75 095 IDM 14G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Rte. 286/Bethel Church Road; Delaware 39-31 -290 75 495 AIO,APT,IDM 16G1 15 mi. NNW; Across from Greater Wilmington Airport 39-40-637 75 570 IDM 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, New Jersey 39-51 -599 75-11 -96 IDM 3H5 25 mi. NE; Farm Market, Rt 77 39-41 -040 75-12-380 FPL,FPV NOTE: All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' Containments. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 390 - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 750 - 32' - 10.6".

All Vegetables (FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT), are management audit samples. They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Tech Specs nor listed in the Stations ODCMs. Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer due to crop rotation.

TABLE B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (Program Overview)

EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

1. DIRECT RADIATION Fifty-one routine monitoring stations with two or more Quarterly Gamma dose/ quarterly dosimeters placed as follows:

Dosimeters An inner ring of stations, one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the site boundary: 1S1,2S2, 2S4, 3S1, 4S1, 5S1, 6S2, 7S 1, 1OS1, 11S1, 15S1, 15S2, 16S1, 16S2.

An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 - 11 km range (3.12 -

6.88 miles) from the site (not bounded by or over water): 4D2, 5D1, 10D1, 14D1, 15D1, 2E1, 3E1, 11E2, 12E1, 13E1, 16E1, 1F1, 3F2, 4F2, 5F1, 6F1, 9F1, 10F2, 11F1, 13F2, 14F2, 15F3.

The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools: 2F2, 2F5, 2F6, 3F3, 7F2, 12F1, 13F3, 13F4, 16F2, 1G3, 10G1, 16G1, 3H1.

and in two areas to serve as control stations: 3G1, 14G1.

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

2. ATMOSPHERIC 7 Samples from 6 locations:

a. Air Particulate 1 sample from close to the Site Boundary: 5S1 Continuous sampler Gross Beta / weekly 1 duplicate: close to the Site Boundary: 5S2 operation with sample Gamma isotopic analysis /

collection weekly or more quarterly composite 3 Samples in different land based sectors: 1F1, 2F6, frequently if required by 5D1.

dust loading

b. Air Iodine 1 Sample from the vicinity of a community: 16E1. Iodine-1 31 / weekly 1 Sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction:

14G1.

3. TERRESTRIAL Samples from milking animals in 3 locations within 5 km distance. If there are none, then, 1 sample from milking Semi-monthly animals in each of 3 areas between 5 - 8 km (3.12 - 5

a. Milk (when animals are on Gamma scan / semi-monthly miles) distant: 13E3, 14F4, 2G3. (1) pasture) Iodine-131 / semi-monthly 1 Sample from milking animals at a control location 15 -

30 km distant (9.38 - 18.75 miles): 3G1. Monthly Gamma scan / monthly (when animals are not on Iodine-131 / monthly pasture)

b. Well Water (Ground) Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be affected. (Although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are Gamma Scan / monthly not directly affected by plant operations, 3E1 farm's well, Monthly Gross alpha / monthly is sampled as management audit sample) Gross beta / monthly Tritium / monthly

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY*

FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS

c. Potable Water One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its (Drinking Water) discharge (No potable water, samples are required as liquid Monthly (composited Gross alpha / monthly effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS do not directly affect daily) Gross beta / monthly this pathway) However, for management audit samples, one raw and one treated sample from a public water supply Tritium / monthly (City of Salem Water and Sewer Department) is collected: Gamma scan / monthly 2F3 Iodine-1 31 / monthly

d. Vegetables One sample of each principal class of food products from area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan/on collection have been discharged (The Delaware River at the location of SGS/HCGS is a brackish water source and is not used for irrigation of food products). Managqement audit samples are collected from various locations during harvest: 2F9, 2F10, 3F6, 3F7, 2G2, 9G1, 9G2, and 3H5. In addition, Broad leaf vegetation (cabbage and kale) was planted &

collected onsite (1S1, 15S1, 16S1) and across the river, 1OD1, in lieu of having a milk farm within 5 km of the Site (1)

e. Fodder Crops Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, a sample of crops normally used as cattle feed (silage) were collected Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan/on collection from our milk farms as management audit samples: 14F4, 3G1, 2G3, 13E3.

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLING AND AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY*

FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS

f. Soil Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of soil are collected as management audit samples: 6S2, Every 3 years Gamma scan/on 2F9, 5F1, 10Di, 16E1, 13E3, 14F4, 2G3, 3G1 (2010-2013-2016) collection (Samples were collected in 2010)

4. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT One sample upstream: 1F2 One sample downstream: 7E1 Monthly Gross Beta/monthly One sample outfall: 11A1 Gamma scan/monthly

a. Surface Water 00 One sample cross-stream (mouth of Appoquinimink River): Tritium/monthly**

12C1 (2)

And an additional location in the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal: 16F1

b. Edible Fish One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area: 11A1 Semi- Gamma scan (flesh)/ on annually collection One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge: 12C1 (2)

And an additional location downstream: 7E1 One sample of each commercially and recreationally

c. Blue Crabs important species in vicinity of plant discharge area: 11A1 Semi- Gamma scan (flesh)/ on annually collection One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge: 12C1 (2)

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY*

EXPOSURE PATHWAY LOCATIONS FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS AND/OR SAMPLE d, Sediment One sample from downstream area: 7E1 Semi- Gamma scan/on collection One sample 2 from cross-stream area and control location: annually 12C 1( 1 One sample from outfall area: 1 1A1 One sample from upstream, the C & D Canal: 16F1 One sample from shoreline area: 6S2 One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown discharge: 15A1 One sample south storm drain discharge line: 16A1

• Except for Dosimeters, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter.

• • Tech Specs and ODCM require quarterly analysis but due to the tritium leak at Salem, it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium.

(1) While these milk locations are not within the 5 km range, they are the closest farms in the Site vicinity.

Since broad leaf vegetation is acceptable in lieu of milk collections, MTS personnel planted and harvested cabbage at three locations on Site (1S1, 15S1, 16S1) and one across the river in Delaware (10D1).

(2)Station 12C1 was made the operational control (1975) for aquatic samples since the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the upstream location originally chosen. This is due to the distance from Liston Point, which is the boundary between the Delaware River and Delaware Bay. As discussed extensively in the SGS/HCGS Pre-operational reports, the sampling locations further upstream show significantly lower background levels due to estuarine tidal flow.

MAP B-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 7

158 732 GENERATING'- E

~TOWER 13 .... / s 5, 9

B-10

MAP B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS B-11

Intentionally left blank APPENDIX C DATA TABLES

Intentionally left blank TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*

IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES, 2012 Results in Units of 10-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD SA-APT-14G1 (C) 12/27/11 - 04/02/12 57 +/- 13 < 14 < 1 < 1 04/02/12 07/02/12 62 + 20 35 <1 <2 07/02/12 10/01/12 55 +/- 15 25 <1 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 38 +/- 9 9 <1 <1 AVERAGE 53 +/- 20 SA-APT-16E1 12/27/11 04/02/12 70 +/- 13 12 <1 <1 04/02/12 07/02/12 102 +/- 22 13 <1 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 58 +/- 17 28 <1 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 38 +/- 8 12 <1 <1 AVERAGE 67 +/- 54 SA-APT-1 F1 12/27/11 04/02/12 54+/- 11 < 14 <1 <1 04/02/12 07/02/12 71 +/- 14 < 25 <2 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 65 +/- 18 < 20 <1 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 48 +/- 17 < 17 <2 <2 AVERAGE 59 +/- 20 SA-APT-2F6 12/27/11 04/02/12 58 +/- 12 < 17 <1 <1 04/02/12 07/02/12 72 +/- 13 < 11 <1 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 54 +/- 17 < 24 <1 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 46 +/- 9 < 14 <1 <1 AVERAGE 58 +/- 22 SA-APT-5D1 12/27/11 04/02/12 50 +/- 15 < 20 <1 <1 04/02/12 07/02/12 68 +/- 16 < 26 <2 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 58 +/- 23 < 29 <2 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 51 +/- 11 < 20 <1 <1 AVERAGE 57 +/- 17

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION C-1

TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*

IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES, 2012 Results in Units of 10-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD SA-APT-5S1 12/27/11 - 04/02/12 73 +/- 16 < 10 < 2 < 2 04/02/12 07/02/12 59 +/- 14 <19 <1 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 55 +/- 16

• 25 <2 <1 10/01/12 01/02/13 < 20 < 37 <3 <2 AVERAGE 62 +/- 18 SA-APT-5S2 12/27/11 04/02/12 66 +/- 17 < 13 <2 <2 04/02/12 07/02/12 71 +/- 15

• 29 <2 <1 07/02/12 10/01/12 60 +/- 25 < 33 <2 <2 10/01/12 01/02/13 57 +/- 17 < 33 <2 <2 AVERAGE 63 +/- 12

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-2

TABLE C-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES, 2012 Results in units of 10-3 pCi/M 3 +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION CONTROL GROUP I PERIOD SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 GROUPI SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-5S2 SA-APT-16E 1 12/27/11 - 01/03/12 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 _3 01/03/12 - 01/09/12 19 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 +3 01/09/12 - 01/16/12 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 _3 01/16/12 - 01/23/12 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11_ 3 _3 01/23/12 - 01/31/12 14 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 14 3 _3 01/31/12 - 02/06/12 17 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 19+/- 4 +4 02/06/12 - 02/13/12 14 +/- 3 14+/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11+/- 3 11 +/-+3 _3 02/13/12 - 02/21/12 14 +/- 3 16_ 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16+/- 3 13 3 _3 02/21/12 - 02/27/12 15 +/- 3 16+/- 4 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 15+/- 3 16+/- 3 +/-3 02/27/12 - 03/05/12 10 +/- 3 11 +/-3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 15+/- 3 14 +/- 4 _3 03/05/12 - 03/12/12 15 +/- 3 16 3 17 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 3 15 +/- 3 _3 03/12/12 - 03/19/12 15 +/- 3 12_ 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13+/- 3 14 +/- 3 _3 03/19/12 - 03/26/12 13 +/- 3 10 4 9-3 9+/-3 9+/-3 9+/-4 +3 03/26/12 - 04/02/12 15 +/- 3 11 +/-+3 11 +/-+3 8+/-3 13+/- 3 9+/-3 _3 04/02/12 - 04/09/12 17 +/- 3 15+/- 4 13 3 16+/- 4 13+/- 3 12+/- 3 +/-3 04/09/12 - 04/16/12 8+/-3 13 3 12+/- 3 12+/- 3 10 +/- 3 16 3 +/-3 04/16/12 - 04/23/12 13_ 3 13 3 12+/- 3 11 +/-+3 12 +/- 3 11 +/-+3 +/-3 04/23/12 - 04/30/12 13+/- 3 12+/- 3 13 3 13 3 13 +/- 3 14+/- 3 _3 04/30/12 - 05/07/12 6+/-3 6+/-3 8+/-3 5+/-3 5+/-2 5+/-3 _3 05/07/12 - 05/14/12 15_ 3 14+/- 3 14+/- 3 15+/- 3 13 3 10+/- 3 +/-3 05/14/12 - 05/21/12 10_ 3 9+/-3 9+/-3 8+/-3 9+/-3 8+/-3 _3 05/21/12 - 05/29/12 8+/-2 9+/-3 7+/-2 7+/-2 5+/-2 8+/-2 _3 05/29/12 - 06/04/12 12+/- 3 12+/- 4 11+/- 3 9+/-3 15+/- 4 8+/-3 _3 06/04/12 - 06/11/12 12+/- 3 10+/- 3 10+/- 3 9+/-3 10+/- 3 10+/- 3 _3 06/11/12 - 06/18/12 8+/-3 8+/-3 11+/- 3 9+/-3 9+/-3 7+/-3 +/-2 06/18/12 - 06/25/12 15+/- 3 14+/- 3 14+/- 3 13+/- 3 15+/- 4 19 +/- 4 _3 06/25/12 - 07/02/12 14 +/- 3 24 +/- 4 7+/-2 26 +/-+5 18_ 4 46 +/- 5 _4 07/02/12 - 07/09/12 22 +/- 4 24 +/- 4 17+/- 3 24 _+5 14+/- 4 24 +/- 4 _4 07/09/12 - 07/16/12 12 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 13+/- 3 12_ 3 11+/- 3 13 +/- 3 _3 07/16/12 - 07/25/12 17 +/- 3 14 3 14 3 11_ 2 14 3 19 +/- 3 _3 07/25/12 - 07/31/12 15 +/- 3 16_ 4 12_ 3 12 3 10+/- 3 11 +/-+3 +/-3 07/31/12 - 08/06/12 13 +/- 3 14 4 14+/- 3 13+/- 3 14 4 13+/- 3 _3 08/06/12 - 08/13/12 15 +/- 3 16_ 3 14 +/- 3 10_ 3 11+/- 3 10+/- 3 +/-3 08/13/12 - 08/20/12 14 +/- 3 18_ 4 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15+/- 3 17+/- 3 _3 08/20/12 - 08/27/12 20 +/- 4 20 +/-+4 21 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 17+/- 4 16+/- 4 _4 08/27/12 - 09/04/12 19 +/- 3 19+/- 3 24 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 23 +/-+3 12 3 +3 09/04/12 - 09/10/12 13 +/- 3 15+/- 4 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/-+4 15 +/-+4 _4 09/10/12 - 09/17/12 14 +/- 3 13+/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15+/- 3 +/-3 09/17/12 - 09/24/12 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13+/- 3 +/-3 09/24/12 - 10/01/12 22 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 18 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 23 +/- 4 _4 10/01/12 - 10/09/12 21 +/- 3 23 +/- 4 20 +/- 3 22 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 _3 10/09/12 - 10/15/12 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 _3 10/15/12 - 10/22/12 11+/- 3 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/-+3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 _3 10/22/12 - 11/01/12 18 3 16 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 16_ 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 _3 11/01/12 - 11/05/12 <5 <5 <6 7+/-4 <5 11/05/12 - 11/12/12 13 _3 14 +/- 3 13 _3 18 +/- 4 12 _3 14+/- 3 13 +3 11/12/12 - 11/19/12 20 -3 20 +/- 3 18 _3 15 +/- 3 19 _3 21 +/-+4 17 +3 11/19/12 - 11/26/12 16 _3 17 +/- 3 20 _3 16 +/- 3 15 _3 18+/- 3 19 _3 11/26/12 - 12/03/12 24 -3 23 +/- 4 24 _4 26 +/- 4 18 _3 20 +/-4 21 +3 12/03/12 - 12/10/12 13 _3 16 +/- 3 14 +3 13 +/- 3 11 _3 14 +/- 4 12 _3 12/10/12 - 12/19/12 20 _3 15 +/- 3 17 +3 15 +/- 3 13 _3 14 +/- 3 17 _3 12/19/12 - 12/26/12 15 _3 19 +/- 3 18 _3 17 +/- 3 14 _3 16 +/- 3 16 _3 12/26/12 - 01/02/13 14 _3 16 +/- 3 12 _3 14 +/- 3 12 +3 10 +/- 3 16 _3 AVERAGE 15 +/- 7 15 +/- 8 14 +/- 8 14 +/- 8 14 +/- 7 14 +/- 12 14 +/- 8

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-3

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR, 2012 Results in units of 10-3 pCi/m6 +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION CONTROL GROUP I PERIOD SA-AIO-14G1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-AIO-2F6 SA-AIO-5D1 SA-AIO-5S1 SA-AIO-5S2 SA-AIO-16E1 12/27/11 - 01/03/12 < 25 < 19 < 17 < 23 < 18 < 19 < 24 01/03/12 - 01/09/12 < 21 < 28 < 25 < 20 < 25 < 28 < 20 01/09/12 - 01/16/12 < 29 < 22 < 21 < 29 < 21 < 22 < 29 01/16/12 - 01/23/12 < 23 < 26 < 24 < 22 < 24 < 26 < 23 01/23/12 - 01/31/12 < 12 < 23 < 21 < 12 < 21 < 22 < 12 01/31/12 - 02/06/12 < 25 < 22 < 20 < 23 < 20 < 21 < 25 02/06/12 - 02/13/12 < 30 < 57 < 53 < 29 < 54 < 57 < 29 02/13/12 - 02/21/12 < 22 < 29 < 27 < 21 < 27 < 28 < 22 02/21/12 - 02/27/12 < 22 < 26 < 23 < 20 < 24 < 25 < 20 02/27/12 - 03/05/12 < 29 < 24 < 22 < 27 < 22 < 23 < 28 03/05/12 - 03/12/12 < 17 < 31 < 29 < 16 < 29 < 30 < 16 03/12/12 - 03/19/12 < 20 < 14 < 14 < 18 < 14 < 14 < 19 03/19/12- 03/26/12 < 10 < 16 < 15 < 11 < 15 < 15 < 12 03/26/12- 04/02/12 < 16 < 19 < 18 < 19 < 18 < 19 < 19 04/02/12 - 04/09/12 < 19 < 25 < 23 < 24 < 24 < 24 < 23 04/09/12 - 04/16/12 < 11 < 16 < 15 < 13 < 15 < 0 < 14 04/16/12 - 04/23/12 < 28 < 33 < 31 ...... <25 < 31 < 31 < 26 04/23/12 - 04/30/12 < 14 < 22 < 21 < 15 < 22 < 20 < 15 04/30/12 - 05/07/12 < 26 < 44 < 41 < 26 < 41 < 42 < 27 05/07/12 - 05/14/12 < 34 < 24 < 24 < 36 < 28 < 26 < 34 05/14/12 - 05/21/12 < 30 < 46 < 41 < 32 < 47 < 46 < 32 05/21/12 - 05/29/12 < 50 < 64 < 57 < 53 < 64 < 62 < 55 05/29/12 - 06/04/12 < 26 < 30 < 27 < 28 < 31 < 30 < 27 06/04/12 - 06/11/12 < 33 < 39 < 35 < 34 < 40 < 39 < 32 06/11/12- 06/18/12 < 16 < 15 < 14 < 16 < 16 < 15 < 15 06/18/12 - 06/25/12 < 34 < 62 < 55 < 38 < 62 < 59 < 34 06/25/12 - 07/02/12 < 27 < 23 < 16 < 44 < 19 < 18 < 29 07/02/12 - 07/09/12 < 16 < 23 < 20 < 23 < 23 < 22 < 18 07/09/12 - 07/16/12 < 45 < 47 < 42 < 54 < 48 < 46 < 47 07/16/12 - 07/25/12 < 21 < 30 < 29 < 22 < 32 < 30 < 21 07/25/12 - 07/31/12 < 20 < 30 < 27 < 21 < 30 < 28 < 21 07/31/12 - 08/06/12 < 30 < 43 < 37 < 28 < 42 < 40 < 31 08/06/12- 08/13/12 < 18 < 15 < 13 < 17 < 14 < 14 < 18 08/13/12- 08/20/12 < 16 < 16 < 14 < 16 < 15 < 15 < 16 08/20/12 - 08/27/12 < 37 < 38 < 32 < 38 < 36 < 35 < 38 08/27/12- 09/04/12 < 19 < 18 < 15 < 18 < 17 < 17 < 19 09/04/12 - 09/10/12 < 32 < 38 < 32 < 30 < 36 < 36 < 34 09/10/12 - 09/17/12 < 20 < 62 < 20 < 20 < 60 < 60 < 20 09/17/12 - 09/24/12 < 20 < 12 < 11 < 18 < 13 < 13 < 19 09/24/12 - 10/01/12 < 16 < 22 < 21 < 18 < 23 < 23 < 17 10/01/12- 10/09/12 < 11 < 17 < 16 < 12 < 18 < 19 < 11 10/09/12 - 10/15/12 < 19 < 20 < 20 < 21 < 22 < 23 < 19 10/15/12 - 10/22/12 < 24 < 25 < 24 < 27 < 27 < 27 < 25 10/22/12- 11/01/12 < 20 < 13 < 13 < 21 < 15 < 15 < 19 11/01/12 - 11/05/12 < 37 < 37 < 35 < 41 < 42 < 43 < 37 11/05/12- 11/12/12 < 16 < 14 < 14 < 17 < 14 <16 < 15 11/12/12- 11/19/12 < 18 < 18 < 17 <20 < 16 < 19 < 18 11/19/12 - 11/26/12 < 32 < 25 < 24 < 36 < 25 < 28 < 32 11/26/12 - 12/03/12 < 30 < 23 < 21 < 33 < 20 < 23 < 30 12/03/12 - 12/10/12 < 16 < 19 < 18 < 16 < 18 < 20 < 15 12/10/12 - 12/19/12 < 15 < 17 < 16 < 16 < 16 < 18 < 14 12/19/12 - 12/26/12 < 30 < 27 < 25 < 30 < 25 < 29 < 30 12/26/12- 01/02/13 < 11 < 13 < 13 < 11 < 13 < 14 < 10 AVERAGE - - - - - - -

C-4

TABLE C-4 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY DOSIMITRY RESULTS*, 2012 Results in units of mR/standard quarter STATION ID AVERAGE JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC

+/- 2 S.D.

SA-IDM-1F1 19.3 +/- 2.7 17.4 19.6 19.7 20.5 SA-IDM-2E1 15.2 +/- 6.6 19.3 11.3 15.8 14.4 SA-IDM-2F2 14.9 +/- 4.8 18.4 14.4 13.9 13.0 SA-IDM-2F5 14.5 + 5.7 15.5 11.3 16.8 SA-IDM-2F6 14.3 +/- 4.0 16.4 15.5 12.3 12.9 SA-IDM-2S2 17,5 +/- 3.7 18.4 19.6 16.0 15.8 SA-IDM-2S4 15.7 +/- 4.4 16.5 12.4 16.6 17.2 SA-IDM-3E1 13.7 +/- 3.0 13.6 15.5 11.8 13.9 SA-IDM-3F2 13.7 +/- 1.7 12.6 13.4 14.4 14.4 SA-IDM-3F3 13.7 +/- 5.3 16.5 10.3 14.8 13.3 SA-IDM-3S1 13.1 +/- 3.6 12.7 15.5 13.1 11.1 SA-IDM-4D2 16.4 +/- 7.1 19.3 11.3 16.8 18.1 SA-IDM-4F2 13.9 +/- 2.1 13.6 14.4 14.9 12.5 SA-IDM-4S1 12.5 +/- 1.8 11.7 13.4 13.1 11.7 SA-IDM-5D1 13.4 +/- 1.7 13.6 13.4 12.3 14.4 SA-IDM-5F1 14.1 +/- 2.3 13.6 13.4 13.6 15.8 SA-IDM-5S1 12.8 +/- 2.2 13.6 13.4 11.2 13.0 SA-IDM-6F1 13.0 +/- 1.9 13.6 13.4 13.4 11.6 SA-IDM-6S2 18.7 :- 3.2 18.4 16.5 19.7 20.0 SA-IDM-7F2 11.9 +/- 2.9 13.6 12.4 10.2 11.5 SA-IDM-7S1 17.8 +/- 13.1 23.2 23.7 12.7 11.6 SA-IDM-9F1 18.3 +/- 1.5 19.3 17.5 18.1 18.2 SA-IDM-10D1 16.5 +/- 1.4 17.4 16.5 16.2 15.7 SA-IDM-10F2 17.6 +/- 2.2 18.4 16.6 16.3 17.2 SA-IDM-10S1 12.6 +/- 2.1 13.6 13.4 11.4 12.1 SA-IDM-11E2 17.0 t 1.9 18.4 16.5 16.3 16.7 SA-IDM-11F1 17.5 +/- 1.4 18.4 17.5 17.5 16.7 SA-IDM-11S1 12.5 +/- 2.3 13.6 13.4 11.4 11.6 SA-IDM-12E1 16.7 +/- 4.3 13.6 18.6 17.4 17.2 SA-IDM-12F1 15.9 +/- 4.4 12.7 17.5 17.0 16.4 SA-IDM-13E1 15.1 +/- 1.4 15.5 15.5 14.0 15.3 SA-IDM-13F2 16.9 +/- 3.5 18.4 17.5 14.3 17.2 SA-IDM-13F3 15.9 +/- 3.1 15.5 17.5 16.5 13.9 SA-IDM-13F4 16.0 +/- 7.7 17.4 10.3 18.4 18.0 SA-IDM-14D1 14.7 +/- 3.7 17.4 13.3 13.7 14.4 SA-IDM-14F2 18.2 AT1.4 18.4 18.6 17.1 18.5 SA-IDM-15D1 16.9 +/- 1.7 17.4 16.5 17.8 15.9 SA-IDM-15F3 17.1 +/- 3.5 14.6 18.6 17.8 17.5 SA-IDM-15S1 13.7 +/- 7.2 14.5 10.3 18.4 11.6 SA-IDM-15S2 14.6 +/- 4.9 15.5 17.5 11.9 13.4 SA-IDM-16E1 16.9 +/- 4.0 16.5 19.6 16.7 14.8 SA-IDM-16F2 16.1 +/- 0.9 16.5 15.5 16.3 16.2 SA-IDM-16S1 15.2 +/- 1.7 15.5 15.5 15.7 13.9 SA-IDM-1G3 (C) 15.1 +/- 3.1 17.4 14.4 13.9 14.8 SA-IDM-3G1 (C) 16.6 +/- 6.6 12.6 20.6 17.1 16.2 SA-IDM-3H1 (C) 13.9 +/- 3.5 13.6 13.4 16.3 12.1 SA-IDM-10G1 (C) 17.1 +/- 2.7 17.4 18.6 16.9 15.4 SA-IDM-14G1 (C) 14.9 +/- 4.4 13.6 13.4 14.6 18.1 SA-IDM-16G1 (C) 14.6 +/- 4.6 17.4 15.5 12.6 12.9 SA-IDM-1S1 *** 37.1 +/- 4.8 35.6 38.2 34.7 39.9 SA-IDM-16S2 36.7 +/- 8.9 30.8 36.1 41.2 38.7 QUARTERLY ELEMENT OSL RESULTS BY LANDAUER THE FIRST HALF OF 2012 & TLD RESULTS BY MIRION THE SECOND HALF OF 2012 RESULTS ARE REPORTED IN MILLIROENTGEN (mR) WITH THE STANDARD QUARTER SAMPLE RESULTS ARE AFFECTED BY THE ISFSI (C) CONTROL STATION C-5

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2012 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION PERIOD GAMMA EMITTERS START STOP 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-13E3 01/02/12 - 01/03/12 < 0.8 1218 +/- 155 <6 <7 < 14 < 147 SA-MLK-14F4 01/02/12 - 01/03/12 < 0.6 1090 + 193 <8 <9 < 15 (1 ) < 177 SA-MLK-2G3 01/02/12 - 01/03/12 < 0.4 1336 +/- 180 <7 <9 < 14 < 180 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/02/12 - 01/03/12 < 0.7 1226 +/- 176 <6 <7 <8 < 173 SA-MLK-13E3 02/05/12 - 02/06/12 < 0.7 1294 +/- 134 <5 7 <8 < 144 SA-MLK-14F4 02/05/12 - 02/06/12 < 0.6 1430 +/- 124 <5 5 <8 < 129 SA-MLK-2G3 02/05/12 - 02/06/12 < 0.8 1252 +/- 172 <7 8 < 10 < 184 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/05/12 - 02/06/12 < 0.7 1217 + 173 <7 9 < 15 < 145 SA-MLK-13E3 03/04/12 - 03/05/12 < 0.7 1299 +/- 126 <5 5 <8 < 115 SA-MLK-14F4 03/04/12 - 03/05/12 < 0.6 1372 +/- 110 <5 5 <7 < 95 SA-MLK-2G3 03/04/12 - 03/05/12 < 0.7 1561 +/- 139 <5 6 <8 < 143 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/04/12 - 03/05/12 < 0.6 1217 +/- 124 <5 5 <8 < 125 SA-MLK-13E3 04/01/12 - 04/02/12 < 0.4 1382 +/- 119 <.5 S <'6 <7 < 115 SA-MLK-14F4 04/01/12 - 04/02/12 < 0.3 1321 +/- 133 <5 <6 <8 < 141 SA-MLK-2G3 04/01/12 - 04/02/12 < 0.3 1246 +/- 143 <6 <6 < 10 < 125 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/01/12 - 04/02/12 < 0.3 1302 +/- 137 <4 <4 <9 < 103 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/15/12 - 04/16/12 < 0.4 1212 + 160 <6 7 < 16 (1) < 151 SA-MLK-14F4 04/15/12 - 04/16/12 < 0.4 1362 +/- 178 <5 5 10 < 155 SA-MLK-2G3 04/15/12 - 04/16/12 < 0.4 1292 +/- 146 <6 7 7 < 146 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/15/12 - 04/16/12 < 0.5 1319 +/- 172 <7 7 11 < 170 SA-MLK-13E3 05/06/12 - 05/07/12 < 0.6 1320 +/- 160 <6 8 < 14 < 202 SA-MLK-14F4 05/06/12 - 05/07/12 < 0.5 1417 +/- 147 <4 6 < 13 < 144 SA-MLK-2G3 05/06/12 - 05/07/12 < 0.5 1438 +/- 129 <5 6 < 11 < 134 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/06/12 - 05/07/12 < 0.5 1189 +/- 169 <5 7 < 10 < 123 SA-MLK-1 3E3 05/21/12 - 05/21/12 < 0.5 1212 +/- 140 <7 7 <8 < 182 SA-MLK-14F4 05/21/12 - 05/21/12 < 0.4 1376 + 201 <9 9 < 15 < 192 SA-MLK-2G3 05/21/12 - 05/21/12 < 0.5 1449 +/- 172 <6 7 <7 < 156 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/21/12 - 05/21/12 < 0.5 1088 +/- 162 <7 7 <8 < 179 SA-MLK-13E3 06/03/12 - 06/04/12 < 0.4 1373 + 161 <6 <7 < 11 < 144 SA-MLK-14F4 06/03/12 - 06/04/12 < 0.4 1390 +/- 142 <5 <7 <9 < 123 SA-MLK-2G3 06/03/12 - 06/04/12 < 0.4 1401 +/- 148 <5 <7 < 12 < 147 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/03/12 - 06/04/12 < 0.4 1473 +/- 133 <4 <5 <7 < 124 SA-MLK-13E3 06/17/12 - 06/18/12 < 0.8 1400 +/- 158 <6 <7 < 14 < 164 SA-MLK-14F4 06/17/12 - 06/18/12 < 0.8 1304 +/- 143 <6 <6 < 11 < 145 SA-MLK-2G3 06/17/12 - 06/18/12 < 0.8 1327 +/- 151 <4 <5 < 12 < 126 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/17/12 - 06/18/12 < 0.9 1255 +/- 139 <5 <6 < 13 < 129 SA-MLK-1 3E3 07/08/12 - 07/09/12 0.6 1337 +/- 136 <5 <6 <11 < 142 SA-MLK-14F4 07/08/12 - 07/09/12 0.7 1316 +/- 122 <5 <6 <7 < 131 SA-MLK-2G3 07/08/12 - 07/09/12 0.6 1351 +/- 152 <5 <6 <8 < 148 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/08/12 - 07/09/12 0.7 1137 + 133 <5 <6 < 11 < 114 IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

(C) CONTROL STATION (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-6

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK, 2012 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION PERIOD GAMMA EMITTERS START STOP 1-131 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-13E3 07/15/12 - 07/16/12 < 0.5 1258 +/- 167 < 5 < 6 < 12 < 174 SA-MLK-14F4 07/15/12 - 07/16/12 < 0.5 1504 +/- 181 < 7 < 8 < 12 < 174 SA-MLK-2G3 07/15/12 - 07/16/12 < 0.5 1274 +/- 176 < 7 < 8 < 11 < 164 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/15/12 - 07/16/12 < 0.5 1313 +/- 152 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 159 SA-MLK-13E3 08/05/12 - 08/06/12 < 0.6 1257 +/- 121 < 5 < 5 < 8 < 130 SA-MLK-14F4 08/05/12 - 08/06/12 < 0.4 1340 +/- 106 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 113 SA-MLK-2G3 08/05/12 - 08/06/12 < 0.4 1331 +/- 110 < 4 < 5 < 7 < 123 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/05/12 - 08/06/12 < 0.5 1255 + 161 < 6 < 7 < 9 < 136 SA-MLK-13E3 08/12/12 - 08/13/12 < 0.5 1132 +/- 163 < 6 < 9 < 8 < 197 SA-MLK-14F4 08/12/12 - 08/13/12 < 0.4 1147 +/- 149 < 7 < 7 < 11 < 176 SA-MLK-2G3 08/12/12 - 08/13/12 < 0.5 1516 +/- 187 < 7 < 8 < 10 < 194 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/12/12 - 08/13/12 < 0.5 1339 +/- 144 < 6 < 6 < 8 < 163 SA-MLK-13E3 09/09/12 - 09/10/12 < 0.6 1499 +/- 117 < 4 < 5 < 13 < 136 SA-MLK-14F4 09/09/12 - 09/10/12 < 0.5 1403 + 175 < 6 < 9 < 19 (1) < 150 SA-MLK-2G3 09/09/12 - 09/10/12 < 0.5 1259 +/- 117 < 4 < 5 < 11 < 121 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/09/12 - 09/10/12 < 0.7 1320 +/- 131 < 5 < 6 < 14 < 160 SA-MLK-13E3 09/23/12 - 09/24/12 < 0.7 1460 +/- 224 < 7 < 11 < 10 < 200 SA-MLK-14F4 09/23/12 - 09/24/12 < 0.7 1245 +/- 199 < 8 < 7 < 13 < 195 SA-MLK-2G3 09/23/12 - 09/24/12 < 0.8 1354 +/- 151 < 7 < 7 < 9 < 142 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/23/12 - 09/24/12 < 0.8 1265 +/- 178 < 7 < 7 < 13 < 185 SA-MLK-13E3 10/14/12 - 10/15/12 < 0.6 1563 +/- 112 < 4 < 5 < 7 < 124 SA-MLK-14F4 10/14/12 - 10/15/12 < 0.6 1381 +/- 148 < 6 < 7 < 10 < 160 SA-MLK-2G3 10/14/12 - 10/15/12 < 0.5 1475 +/- 143 < 5 < 6 < 9 < 154 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/14/12 - 10/15/12 < 0.7 1193 +/- 124 < 5 < 7 < 12 < 134 SA-MLK-13E3 10/31/12 - 11/01/12 < 0.6 1263 +/- 147 < 5 < 6 < 14 < 152 SA-MLK-14F4 10/31/12 - 11/01/12 < 0.6 1431 + 212 < 8 < 9 < 20 (1) < 177 SA-MLK-2G3 10/31/12 - 11/01/12 < 0.5 1298 +/- 144 < 6 < 7 < 15 < 146 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 10/31/12 - 11/01/12 < 0.6 1371 +/- 152 < 5 < 7 < 14 < 154 SA-MLK-13E3 11/11/12 - 11/12/12 < 0.8 1242 + 166 < 7 < 8 < 10 < 136 SA-MLK-14F4 11/11/12 - 11/12/12 < 0.5 1318 +/- 131 < 5 < 6 < 9 < 135 SA-MLK-2G3 11/11/12 - 11/12/12 < 0.8 1409 +/- 121 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 150 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/11/12 - 11/12/12 < 0.6 1218 +/- 116 < 4 < 6 < 7 < 114 SA-MLK-13E3 11/25/12 - 11/26/12 < 0.7 1327 + 171 < 8 < 9 < 18 (1) < 175 SA-MLK-14F4 11/25/12 - 11/26/12 < 0.9 1373 +/- 138 < 6 < 7 < 10 < 128 SA-MLK-2G3 11/25/12 - 11/26/12 < 0.8 1417 +/- 129 < 6 < 6 < 10 < 154 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 11/25/12 - 11/26/12 < 0.8 1280 +/- 132 < 6 < 6 < 10 < 155 SA-MLK-13E3 12/09/12 - 12/10/12 < 0.6 1360 +/- 115 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 135 SA-MLK-14F4 12/09/12 - 12/10/12 < 0.5 1277 + 143 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 146 SA-MLK-2G3 12/09/12 - 12/10/12 < 0.6 1350 +/- 110 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 108 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 12/09/12 - 12/10/12 < 0.7 1308 +/- 112 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 138 ANNUAL AVERAGE - 1323 +/- 199 - -

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

(C) CONTROL STATION (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-7

TABLE C-6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/liter +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION Gr-A Gr-B H-3 PERIOD U

SA-WWA-3E 1 01/23/12 - 01/23/12 < 0.8 < 1.8 < 169 SA-WWA-3E 1 02/27/12 - 02/27/12 <2.1

• 3.1 < 163 SA-WWA-3E1 03/26/12 - 03/26/12 < 1.0

• 2.0 < 168 SA-WWA-3E1 04/23/12 - 04/23/12 < 0.6

• 1.5

• 177 SA-WWA-3E1 05/29/12 - 05/29/12 < 2.8

• 2:4

• 170 SA-WWA-3E1 06/28/12 - 06/28/12 < 1.0 2.7+/- 1.5

• 200 SA-WWA-3E 1 07/25/12 - 07/25/12

• 1.8 < 2.3 < 192 SA-WWA-3E1 08/27/12 - 08/27/12

• 0.9 < 2.5 < 190 SA-WWA-3E1 09/27/12 - 09/27/12

• 0.8

• 1.5

• 169 SA-WWA-3E 1 10/24/12 - 10/24/12

• 1.7

• 1.9 < 187 SA-WWA-3E 1 11/29/12 - 11/29/12

• 1.2 < 1.8

• 179 SA-WWA-3E 1 12/19/12 - 12/19/12 2.6 +/- 1.6

• 3.4 < 189 AVERAGE** 3.4 +/- 2.4 2.7 + 0.0

• MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVITION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-8

TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 PERIOD SA-WWA-3E1 01/23/12 - 01/23/12 < 86 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 0 < 5 < 5 <8 < 132 SA-WWA-3E1 02/27/12 - 02/27/12 < 32 <3 <3 <8 <3 <6 <3 <0 <3 <3 <7 < 86 SA-WWA-3E1 03/26/12 - 03/26/12 < 104 <6 <5 < 13 <6 <9 <6 <0 <5 <6 < 11 < 146 SA-WWA-3E1 04/23/12 - 04/23/12 < 65 <5 <6 < 12 <5 < 11 <6 <0 <6 <6 <9 < 158 SA-WWA-3E1 05/29/12 - 05/29/12 < 94 <5 <6 < 13 <4 <9 <6 <0 <4 <5 < 12 < 137 SA-WWA-3E1 06/28/12 - 06/28/12 < 73 <4 <4 <9 <4 <7 <5 < 1 <4 <4 < 13 < 108 SA-WWA-3E1 07/25/12 - 07/25/12 < 39 <4 <5 <9 <5 <9 <6 <0 <5 <6 <8 < 160 SA-WWA-3E1 08/27/12 - 08/27/12 < 93 <4 <4 < 12 <6 <9 <5 <0 <5 <5 < 11 < 141 SA-WWA-3E1 09/27/12 - 09/27/12 < 62 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <5 <1 <3 <3 < 11 < 91 SA-WWA-3E1 10/24/12 - 10/24/12 < 36 <6 <6 < 14 <5 < 13 <7 <1 <6 <5 < 18 (1) < 118 SA-WWA-3E1 11/29/12 - 11/29/12 < 40 <3 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <1 <3 <4 <7 < 78 SA-WWA-3E1 12/19/12 - 12/19/12 54 +/- 25 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <7 <2 <2 <4 <43 AVERAGE** 54 +/- 0

• MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVITION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER (2F3), 2012 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION Gr-A Gr-B H-3 PERIOD RAW 01/01/12 - 01/31/12 < 1.0 < 2.5 < 166 02/01/12 - 02/27/12 < 1.1 < 2.3 < 177 03/01/12 - 03/31/12 < 1.7 4.4 +/- 2.1 < 178 04/01/12 - 04/30/12 < 1.0 4.4 +/- 1.6 < 183 05/01/12 - 05/31/12 < 0.6 2.2 +/- 1.1 < 159 06/01/12 - 06/30/12 < 1.2 4.0 +/- 2.1 < 198 07/01/12 - 07/31/12 < 2.1 < 3.5 < 178 08/01/12 - 08/31/12 < 0.9 3.4 +/- 0.9 < 166 09/01/12 - 09/30/12 < 0.5 3.0 +/- 0.9 < 166 10/01/12 - 10/31/12 < 0.9 2.4 +/- 1.1 < 189 11/01/12 - 11/30/12 < 1.5 4.3 +/- 1.3 < 178 12/01/12 - 12/31/12 < 2.6 < 2.9 < 187 TREATED MEAN 3.5 +/- 1.8 01/01/12 - 01/31/12 < 0.9 < 2.4 < 166 02/01/12 - 02/27/12 < 1.9 < 2.7 < 174 03/01/12 - 03/31/12 < 1.8 4.2 +/- 2.1 < 175 04/01/12 - 04/30/12 < 1.2 4.0 +/- 1.7 < 186 05/01/12 - 05/31/12 < 0.8 3.0 +/- 1.3 < 163 06/01/12 - 06/30/12 < 1.4 3.8 +/- 2.2 < 195 07/01/12 - 07/31/12 < 2.7 3.9 +/- 2.5 < 184 08/01/12 - 08/31/12 < 1.0 2.8 +/- 1.0 < 170 09/01/12 - 09/30/12 < 0.6 3.1 +/- 1.0 < 167 10/01/12 - 10/31/12 < 1.2 3.3 +/- 1.4 < 200 11/01/12 - 11/30/12 < 1.9 4.0 +/- 1.5 < 176 12/01/12 - 12/31/12 < 2.6 < 3.0 < 188 MEAN 3.5 +/- 1.0

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-10

TABLE C-9 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER (2F3), 2012 Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION PERIOD <----------

GAMMA EMITTERS ---------->

START STOP 1-131 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-PWR-2F3 01/01/12 01/31/12 < 0.4 < 90 <5 <4 < 9 <4 < 10 <5 <8 <5 <5 <6 < 122 SA-PWT-2F3 01/01/12 01/31/12 < 87 <4 <5 < 11 <5 <9 <5 <5 <9

< 0.4 <8 <6 < 143 SA-PWR-2F3 02/01/12 02/27/12 < 0.3 < 86 <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <5 <0 <4 <5 <9 <117 SA-PWT-2F3 02/01/12 02/27/12 < 0.3 < 51 <5 <5 <11 <4 <8 <5 <0 <5 <5 <9 <123 SA-PWR-2F3 03/01/12 03/31/12 < 0.4 <128 <7 <8 <16 <7 <14 <6 <10 <6 <6 <10 <159 SA-PWT-2F3 03/01/12 03/31/12 < 0.4 <93 <5 <4 <10 <4 <10 <5 <8 <5 <5 <8 <146 SA-PWR-2F3 04/01/12 04/30/12 < 0.6 < 58 <7 <7 <14 <7 <14 <8 <1 <7 <7 <10 <136 SA-PWT-2F3 04/01/12 04/30/12 < 0.5 < 26 <3 <2 <5 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <2 <4 <67 SA-PWR-2F3 05/01/12 05/31/12 < 0.5 < 58 <6 <8 < 16 <8 < 14 <9 <0 <8 <7 < 13 < 135 C.?A-PWT-2F3 05/01/12 05/31/12 < 0.6 < 48 <5 <5 < 11 <4 < 10 <5 <1 <5 <4 <7 < 126

-,SA-PWR-2F3 06/01/12 06/30/12 < 0.8 < 73 <6 <6 <17 <7 <9 <7 <1 <5 <6 <21 <131 SA-PWT-2F3 06/01/12 06/30/12 < 0.8 < 37 <4 <4 <11 <4 <8 <6 <1 <4 <5 <11 <91 SA-PWR-2F3 07/01/12 07/31/12 < 0.6 < 76 <8 <8 <18 <8 <17 <8 <1 <8 <7 <12 <162 SA-PWT-2F3 07/01/12 07/31/12 < 0.6 < 91 <5 <6 <11 <4 <8 <6 <9 <5 <6 <7 <140 SA-PWR-2F3 08/01/12 08/31/12 < 0.5 < 48 <6 <7 <14 <6 <13 <6 <0 <6 <6 <13 <132 SA-PWT-2F3 08/01/12 08/31/12 < 0.6 < 81 <4 <4 <10 <4 <9 <5 <1 <4 <4 <10 <116 SA-PWR-2F3 09/01/12 09/30/12 < 0.6 < 60 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <4 <8 <3 <3 <6 <90 SA-PWT-2F3 09/01/12 09/30/12 < 0.5 < 36 <3 <3 <8 <4 <8 <4 <8 <3 <3 <7 <83 SA-PWR-2F3 10/01/12 10/31/12 < 0.9 <54 <6 <7 <11 <5 <8 <6 <1 <5 <5 <12 <145 SA-PWT-2F3 10/01/12 10/31/12 < 0.8 < 128 <5 <6 < 15 <8 <12 <8 <1 <6 <7 <9 <146 SA-PWR-2F3 11/01/12 11/30/12 < 0.8 < 45 <4 <5 <10 <4 <10 <6 <1 <4 <5 <9 <108 SA-PWT-2F3 11/01/12 11/30/12 < 0.6 < 95 <4 <6 <10 <6 <10 <6 <1 <4 <5 <9 <128 SA-PWR-2F3 12/01/12 12/31/12 < 0.4 < 69 <4 <4 <8 <4 <7 <4 <8 <4 <4 <7 <102 SA-PWT-2F3 12/01/12 12/31/12 < 0.4 < 26 <3 <3 <6 <3 <5 <3 <6 <2 <3 <4 <65 AVERAGE

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN VEGETABLES*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION SAMPLE < -------GAMMA EMITTERS--------->

PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2F9 04/22/12 asparagus < 105 1987 +/- 241 < 26 < 11 < 13 < 272 < 36 AVERAGE* 1987 +/- 0 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 05/06/12 asparagus < 119 2384 +/- 286 < 27 < 13 < 16 < 316 < 62 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 05/21/12 asparagus < 155 2432 +/- 382 < 37 < 16 < 17 < 443 < 75 AVERAGE* 2408 +/- 68 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 07/09/12 corn < 43 2391 +/- 115 < 18 < 4 < 5 < 89 < 16 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 07/09/12 tomatoes < 39 2049 +/- 91 < 14 < 4 < 4 < 97 < 17 SA-FPV-15F4 07/19/12 corn < 39 2283 +/- 100 < 15 < 3 < 4 < 81 < 16 SA-FPV-15F4 07/19/12 peppers < 41 2321 +/- 99 < 21 < 4 < 4 < 107 < 17 SA-FPV-15F4 07/19/12 tomatoes < 53 2909 +/- 108 < 25 < 5 < 5 < 122 < 20 SA-FPV-1G1 (C) 07/23/12 corn < 47 2078 +/- 107 < 16 < 5 < 5 < 84 < 19 SA-FPV-1G1 (C) 07/23/12 tomatoes < 35 2248 +/- 91 < 13 < 3 < 4 < 75 < 13 SA-FPV-2F9 07/23/12 corn < 38 2049 +/- 87 < 13 < 4 < 4 < 96 < 13 SA-FPV-2F9 07/23/12 tomatoes < 47 2450 +/- 115 < 17 < 5 < 5 < 88 < 21 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/23/12 corn < 36 2017 +/- 89 < 13 < 4 < 4 < 92 < 17 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/23/12 tomatoes < 28 2234 +/- 76 < 11 < 3 < 3 < 66 < 12 SA-FPV-9G2 (C) 07/23/12 corn < 47 2459 +/- 109 < 15 < 4 < 5 < 98 < 19 SA-FPV-9G2 (C) 07/23/12 tomatoes < 29 2304 +/- 73 < 11 < 3 < 3 < 74 < 12 SA-FPV-1G1 (C) 07/31/12 peppers < 142 2382 +/- 348 < 36 < 17 < 20 < 417 < 75 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/31/12 cabbage < 222 2349 +/- 482 < 45 < 24 < 25 < 488 < 83 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 07/31/12 peppers < 136 2295 +/- 333 < 33 < 13 < 16 < 403 < 56 AVERAGE* 2301 +/- 432

• MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN VEGETABLES*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION SAMPLE <--------GAMMA EMITTERS ----.------ >

PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-VGT-14F4 10/13/12 Peppers < 216 14700 +/- 795 < 44 < 20 < 24 < 490 < 106 AVERAGE* 14700 +/- 0 SA-VGT-1 F1 11/02/12 soy beans < 59 13770 +/- 236 < 46 <5 <5 < 94 < 23 AVERAGE* 13770 +/- 0 SA-FPL-10D1 12/13/12 cabbage < 198 2618 +/- 385 < 30

• 14 < 22 < 346 < 67 SA-FPL-15S1 12/13/12 cabbage < 264 3555 +/- 586 < 48

• 26 50 +/- 28 < 628 < 130 SA-FPL-16S1 12/13/12 cabbage

• 281 3494 +/- 521 < 45 < 23 < 37 < 567 < 104 SA-FPL-1S1 12/13/12 cabbage 267 +/- 173 4331 +/- 427 < 37 < 21 < 23 < 534 < 71 AVERAGE* 267 +/- 0 3500 +/- 0 50 +/- 0

TABLE C-1ll CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FODDER CROPS*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 DATE SA-VGT-13E3 12/26/12 Silage 96 +/- 46 3851 +/- 163 < 21 <6 <7 < 139 < 26 SA-VGT-14F4 12/26/12 Silage 154 +/- 37 2412 +/- 92 < 11 <3 <3 < 74 < 11 SA-VGT-2G3 12/26/12 Silage 120 +/- 42 3353 +/- 116 <8 <2 <2 < 62 < 10 SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 12/26/12 Silage 49 +/- 30 1296 +/- 75 < 13 <4 < 88 < 14 AVERAGE 105 +/- 88 2728 +/- 2252

• MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 sigma Soil samples are collected every 3 years. Soil will be collected in 2013 C-15

TABLE C-13 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BEEF AND GAME*, 2012 Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE Be-7 K-40 Cs-1 3 4 Cs-1 37 DATE SA-GAM-3E1 02/24/12 Muscrat < 58 3020 +/- 178 <6 <6 SA-FPB-3E1 04/01/12 Cow < 85 2320 + 80.8 <2 <3 SA-FPB-11 E3 04/01/12 Cow < 477 2504 +/- 120 <5

• MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-14 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION CONTROL PERIOD SA-SWA-11 Al SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E 1 01/06/12 01/06/12 74 +/-9 67 7 44 +5 26 +2 107 +/- 10 02/06/12 02/06/12 98 +/-9 57 6 52 +/-5 29 +3 124 +/- 10 03/06/12 03/06/12 122 + 11 59 9 37 +7 16 +9 26 +3 04/03/12 04/03/12 131 + 15 111 _+ 13 80 +/-8 60 +8 196 + 20 05/11/12 05/11/12 138 +/- 17 87 _+ 13 51 +/-+11 40 +4 114 +/- 16 06/05/12 06/05/12 86 +/- 12 58 _+ 10 37 +/-8 27 +/-7 125 + 14 07/03/12 07/03/12 126 + 27 105 +/- 20 88 +/-+11 51 +7 235 +/- 30 08/06/12 08/06/12 150 +19 105 +/-- 15 77 +/-12 72 +/- 12 169 +/- 26 09/06/12 09/06/12 103 +/- 22 106 _+ 18 92 +18 64 +/- 14 118 +/- 25 10/01/12 10/01/12 175 +/- 29 117 +/- 21 81 +/-18 56 +/-16 90 +/-19 11/06/12 11/06/12 108 +/- 25 70 +/- 17 41 +12 20 +9 140 +/- 26 12/05/12 12/05/12 132 + 23 99 +/- 20 100 _ 22 61 + 16 164 +/- 37 AVERAGE 120 +/- 56 87 +/- 46 65 +/- 47 43 +/- 39 134 +/- 107 C-17

TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION CONTROL PERIOD SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/12 - 01/06/12

• 167

• 167

• 167 166

• 169 02/06/12 - 02/06/12

• 175

• 178

• 178 178

• 179 03/06/12 - 03/06/12

• 178

• 176

• 180 177

• 176 04/03/12 - 04/03/12

• 166

• 164

• 168 169

• 166 05/11/12 - 05/11/12

• 181

• 181

• 183 178 735 _ 153 (1) 06/05/12 - 06/05/12

• 191

• 190

• 190 187

• 185 07/03/12 - 07/03/12

• 198

• 200

• 193 198

• 193 08/06/12 - 08/06/12

• 170

• 170

• 165 166

• 165 09/06/12 - 09/06/12

• 180

• 177

• 174 178

• 176 10/01/12 - 10/01/12

• 193

• 191

• 193 196

• 191 11/06/12 - 11/06/12

• 195

• 195

• 197 198 < 197 12/05/12 - 12/05/12

• 165

• 178

• 179 180

• 177 AVERAGE* 735 +/- 0 00

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) THE SA-SWA-7E1 05/11/12 SAMPLE WAS TAKEN DOWNSTREAM DURING DISHCARGE AND IS SIMILAR TO THE 2005 RESULTS OF 820 pCi/L

TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 I-131* Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 PERIOD SA-SWA-11A1 01/06/12 < 40 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 7 < 6 < 5 < 1 < 5 <4 < 9 02/06/12 84 +/- 38 <4 <4 <8 <5 <8 <4 <1 <4 <4 <5 03/06/12 < 70 <6 <6 < 15 <5 < 15 <7 < 0.4 <5 <7 < 15 (1) 04/03/12 < 52 <6 <6 < 14 <6 < 10 <6 < 0.5 <5 <6 < 11 05/11/12 132 +/- 59 <4 <5 <8 <6 < 10 <5 <1 <5 <5 < 12 06/05/12 < 36 <5 <6 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <1 <4 <5 < 13 07/03/12 95 +/- 59 <3 <4 <9 <4 <6 <4 < 11 <3 <3 <9 08/06/12 < 51 <5 <6 < 13 <7 < 13 <5 < 17 <5 <5 < 10 09/06/12 < 36 <4 <5 < 10 <5 < 10 <5 < 12 <4 <5 < 10 10/01/12 84 +/- 24 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 < 10 <2 <2 <6 11/06/12 < 48 <4 <5 < 11 <5 < 12 <6 < 16 <5 <5 < 12 12/05/12 < 55 <5 <6 < 10 <5 <9 <6 < 16 <5 <6 < 13 AVERAGE** 99 +/- 46 SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 01/06/12 110 +/- 69 <6 <5 < 12 <5 < 13 <6 <1 <5 <5 < 10 02/06/12 < 44 <5 <6 < 11 <6 < 11 <6 <1 <4 <5 <6 03/06/12 < 41 <4 <4 < 10 <4 <9 <5 <0 <4 <4 < 10 04/03/12 < 53 <5 <5 < 12 <5 < 11 <6 <1 <5 <6 < 13 05/11/12 < 46 <6 <6 < 12 <6 < 10 <7 <1 <5 <7 < 15 06/05/12 < 122 <6 <5 < 16 <7 < 13 <7 <0 <6 <6 < 13 07/03/12 < 37 <4 <5 < 11 <6 < 11 <5 < 16 <4 <5 <8 08/06/12 < 49 <6 <6 < 11 <5 < 11 <5 < 16 <6 <5 < 12 09/06/12 < 41 <5 <4 < 10 <4 <8 <5 < 11 <4 <4 <9 10/01/12 62 + 22 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <7 <1 <1 <4 11/06/12 < 40 <5 <5 < 12 <6 < 10 <6 < 16 <4 <5 <9 12/05/12 < 54 <5 <5 < 10 <6 < 11 <5 < 16 <5 <7 <9 AVERAGE** 86 +/- 67 IODINE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 PERIOD SA-SWA-16F1 01/06/12 < 64 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 11 < 6 < 1 < 5 < 4 < 11 02/06/12 < 37 <5 <5 < 12 <6 < 11 <5 <1 <6 <6 <7 03/06/12 64 + 34 <3 <4 <9 <3 <6 <4 <0 <3 <3 <7 04/03/12 < 41 <5 <6 < 11 <5 <9 <7 <1 <6 <5 < 12 05/11/12 < 89 <8 <7 < 22 <7 < 18 <9 < 17 <8 <8 < 14 06/05/12 < 29 <6 <7 < 17 <7 < 14 <9 <0 <7 <7 < 14 07/03/12 < 38 <4 <4 <8 <4 <8 <4 < 14 <4 <4 <9 08/06/12 < 101 <8 < 10 < 23 <8 < 17 <8 < 26 <8 <7 < 14 09/06/12 < 64 <6 <7 < 16 <6 < 14 <7 < 15 <5 <7 < 13 10/01/12 < 20 <2 <3 <6 <2 <4 <3 < 14 <2 <2 <7 11/06/12 < 39 <4 <5 <8 <3 <8 <5 < 16 <4 <5 <9 12/05/12 < 45 <4 <5 < 11 <5 <9 <5 < 13 <4 <4 < 10 AVERAGE** 64 +/- 0 SA-SWA-1 F2 01/06/12 95 + 58 <6 <5 < 17 <5 < 13 <8 <1 <5 <6 < 11 02/06/12 < 130 <6 <5 < 15 <8 < 11 <5 <0 <5 <6 < 10 03/06/12 < 49 <5 <5 < 11 <4 <9 <6 <0 <5 <6 < 12 04/03/12 < 142 <7 <7 < 17 <7 < 16 <7 <1 <7 <8 < 15 05/11/12 < 109 <5 <5 < 12 <5 < 11 <6 <1 <5 <6 < 12 06/05/12 < 59 <5 <6 < 16 <8 < 13 <7 <0 <6 <6 <8 07/03/12 < 67 <7 <7 < 17 <7 < 12 <7 < 20 <6 <7 < 17 (1) 08/06/12 < 48 <5 <6 < 12 <6 < 13 <6 < 18 <5 <6 < 12 09/06/12 < 40 <4 <4 <9 <4 < 10 <5 < 11 <4 <4 <7 10/01/12 < 15 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 < 11 <2 <2 <6 11/06/12 < 129 <7 <9 < 16 <8 < 17 < 10 < 23 <7 <8 < 19 (1) 12/05/12 < 48 <6 <5 < 10 <5 < 10 <5 < 14 <5 <5 < 11 AVERAGE** 95 +/- 0 -

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 I-131* Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 PERIOD SA-SWA-7E1 01/06/12 115 +/- 56 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 13 < 6 < 1 < 5 < 6 < 9 02/06/12 < 63 <7 <6 < 15 <.7 < 10 <6 <1 <6 <7 < 11 03/06/12 < 34 <4 <5 < 10 <4 < 10 <6 <1 <5 <5 <7 04/03/12 < 125 <5 <6 < 10 <4 <9 <4 <1 <4 <3 <8 05/11/12 124 +/- 73 <5 <6 < 14 <7 < 13 <6 <1 <5 <7 <8 06/05/12 < 72 <7 <8 < 16 <9 < 14 < 10 <0 <6 <8 < 10 07/03/12 124 +/- 59 <4 <5 < 11 <4 < 10 <6 < 15 <5 <5 <9 08/06/12 < 43 <4 <.4 < 10 <4 <9 <4 < 13 <4 <4 <8 09/06/12 108 +/- 58 <4 <5 <9 <5 <8 <5 < 12 <4 <5 <8 10/01/12 90 +/- 25 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 < 11 <2 <2 <5 11/06/12 103 +/- 65 <4 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <5 < 16 <4 <5 < 11 12/05/12 < 46 <5 <5 < 10 <5 <9 <5 < 15 <4 <5 <9 AVERAGE** 111 +/- 26

• IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

• • THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-17 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN EDIBLE FISH, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 PERIOD SA-ESF-1 WA 04/25/12 4527 +/- 845 < 40 < 52 < 99 < 50 < 87 < 39 < 49 < 899 10/01/12 4364 +/- 992 < 68 < 92 < 155 < 63 < 129 < 70 < 71 < 1597 AVERAGE 4446 +/- 231 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 04/24/12 3278 +/- 809 < 52 < 59 < 101 < 40 < 96 < 47 < 50 < 1154 10/01/12 3485 +/- 683 < 33 < 42 < 118 < 24 < 80 < 37 < 39 < 689 AVERAGE 3382 +/- 293 -

SA-ESF-7E1 C-) 04/25/12 4924 +/- 791 < 36 < 44 < 121 < 38 < 98 < 37 < 48 < 917 10/01/12 4594 +/- 820 < 53 < 80 < 171 < 52 < 116 < 58 < 62 < 1396 AVERAGE 4759 +/- 467 -

(C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-18 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CRABS, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma STATION ID COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 PERIOD SA-ECH-1IA1 07/23/12 2639 +/- 800 < 71 < 74 < 141 < 50 < 140 < 74 < 65 < 1454 08/31/12 2650 +/- 1015 < 68 < 70 < 182 < 72 < 185 < 68 < 74 < 1837 AVERAGE 2645 +/- 16 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 07/23/12 3247 +/- 972 < 58 < 65 < 141 < 54 < 120 < 54 < 59 < 1160 08/20/12 1157 +/- 362 < 23 < 23 < 42 < 22 < 46 < 19 < 23 < 372 08/31/12 3276 +/- 916 < 48 < 46 < 115 < 39 < 97 < 49 < 51 < 951 AVERAGE 2560 +/- 2430 (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-19 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT, 2012 Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 Sigma STATION ID COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 PERIOD SA-ESS-11A1 05/30/12 < 400 4164 +/- 659 < 39 < 41 < 850 445 +/- 139 11/21/12 < 287 6594 +/- 643 < 27 < 34 < 727 445 +/- 93 AVERAGE* 5379 +/- 3437 445 +/- 0 SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 05/30/12 < 809 16470 +/- 1436 < 70 < 82 2644 +/- 1541 1117 +/- 228 11/21/12 < 527 12000 +/- 1188 < 48 < 60 2188 +/- 943 953 +/- 178 AVERAGE* 14235 +/- 6322 2416 +/- 645 1035 +/- 232 SA-ESS-15A1 05/30/12 < 511 4655 +/- 764 < 46 < 48 < 895 429 +/- 176 11/21/12 < 390 5811 +/- 714 < 33 < 42 1359 +/- 848 524 +/- 116 AVERAGE* 5233 +/- 1635 1359 +/-0 476 +/- 134 SA-ESS-16A1 05/30/12 < 633 6912 +/- 1019 < 51 < 69 3101 +/- 1375 899 +/- 198 11/21/12 < 378 4896 +/- 606 < 35 < 37 1240 +/- 722 401 +/- 120 AVERAGE* 5904 +/- 2851 2171 +/- 2632 650 +/- 704 SA-ESS-16F1 05/30/12 < 707 16320 +/- 1776 < 83 < 82 < 1271 837 +/- 278 11/21/12 < 1115 20380 +/- 2006 < 100 < 108 < 2111 1186 +/- 347 AVERAGE* 18350 +/- 5742 1012 +/- 493 SA-ESS-6S2 06/11/12 < 285 2563 +/- 581 < 27 < 33 < 657 183 +/- 59 11/21/12 < 124 2537 +/- 420 < 12 < 18 < 239 147 +/- 61 AVERAGE* 2550 +/- 37 165 +/- 50 SA-ESS-7E1 05/30/12 < 827 17560 +/- 1901 < 77 < 99 < 1561 1243 +/- 265 11/21/12 < 321 13250 +/- 963 < 27 < 38 1710 +/- 827 796 +/- 146 AVERAGE* 15405 +/- 6095 1710 +/-0 1020 +/- 632

• THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATE 1990 THROUGH 2012 1000.0 GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE (1) (2)(3)(4) (5) (6) 1973 THROUGH 2012 1000 100 10 100.0 1

1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 C.

C1 10.0 1.0 .............

N ~ O~ N'P tk Icc b c Nc q5:O ~~#I QP~~ ~t~3 N 1- Weapons Test 1974 2- Weapons Test 1976 3- Weapons Test 1977 4- Weapons Test 1978 5- Weapons Test 1980 6- Chernobyl 1986 IQUARTERLY AVERAGE I

FIGURE 2 AMBIENT RADIATION - OFFSITE vs CONTROL STATION 1990 THROUGH 2012 20.0 18.0 16.0 n.

k) 0 14.0 12.0 10.0 N

lle e,*, ý,cbolrl 11,01c,"oý,e el" 1,C01, e" '6P 0, e rlpN pN rlpN pl 1-Weapons Test 1974 2-Weapons Test 1976 3-Weapons Test 1977 4-Weapons Test 1978 5-Weapons Test 1980 6-Chernobyl 1986 I QUARTERLY AVERAGE I

FIGURE 3 IODINE - 131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 1990 THROUGH 2012 20 IODINE-131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 1973 THROUGH 2012 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 25.00 I*

20.00

..;  ;;i. .. :i* ~

15.0.(

10.00 5.00 0.00 * * *%:== *=!=* * =" * =' * *

-5.00

-10.00 10

-J 0

-10 I II i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1411111111111111fIIIIIIIIIIIIIi IIIIIi IIIIIIIi Nq 0 cP ":

(: Nq p lp (ZýD 0)IV KpN pN 1-Weapons Test 1974 2-Weapons Test 1976 3-Weapons Test 1977 4-Weapons Test 1978 5-Weapons Test 1980 6-Chernobyl 1986 IQUARTERLY AVERAGEI

FIGURE 4 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1990 THROUGH 2012 10000 (1)(2)(3)(4)l 1000 1 1 11 100 1000 10

' - 100 00 10 1 - i I iiiiii*i*

I I II I i I I,i i iiI** i *i i i t* ti ii *II i i I i ti,*I ti i i i i *i i i i i 1-Weapons Test 1974 2-Weapons Test 1976 3-Weapons Test 1977 4-Weapons Test 1978 5-Weapons Test 1980 6-Chernobyl 1986 FQUARTERLY AVERAGEI

FIGURE 5 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1990 THROUGH 2012 10000.00 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)1973 Through 2012 10000 1 11m 1000 = ,

1000 100 1000.00 100.00Effluent Discharge jr time of sa pig 0 -0" 0 JAI 100.00 10.00 1-Weapons Test 1974 2-Weapons Test 1976 3-Weapons Test 1977 4-Weapons Test 1978 5-Weapons Test 1980 6-Chernobyl I QUARTERLY AVERAGE 1986

FIGURE 6 CESIUM-137 & COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1990 THROUGH 2012 10000 CESIUM-137 & COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1977 THROUGH 2012

• there has not been any Co-60 detected above MDC since 2002

- CS-137

-.-.. CO-60 * (1) (2) (3)(4) (5) (6) 10000 1000 100 1000 -I V

10 .

qACb lq lq 141 10511 14010 1* I-1cl, , .

V 100 ^ "A

/' ,' \/)K'j K, " -\

10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

'0N Ilk CPR<bR 1-Weapons Test 1974 2-Weapons Test 1976 3-Weapons Test 1977 4-Weapons Test 1978 5-Weapons Test 1980 6-Chernobyl 1986 SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE

FIGURE 7 CESIUM -137 ACTIVITY IN SOIL 1974 THROUGH 2010 (TRIENNIAL) 800.0 Weapons Test Weapons Test 1974 1978 700.0 600.0 Weapons Test 17 Tes 500.0 Weapons7Test .

1977 0)

-* 400.0 CL) Weapons Test "

1980 300.0 Chernobyl 1986 °*

200.0 100.0 0.0 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

Intentionally left blank APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA),

AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) - MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

Intentionally left blank TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2012 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2012 E10066 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 101 94.8 1.07 A Sr-90 pCi/L 11.7 13.5 0.87 A E10067 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 87.5 92.5 0.95 A Ce-141 pCi/L 247 260 0.95 A Cr-51 pCi/L 435 436 1.00 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 133 149 0.89 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 156 159 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 127 132 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 190 195 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi/L 179 168 1.07 A Zn-65 pCi/L 327 333 0.98 A Co-60 pCi/L 274 279 0.98 A E10069 AP Ce-141 pCi 167 164 1.02 A Cr-51 pCi 310 276 1.12 A Cs-134 pCi 107 94.5 1.13 A Cs-137 pCi 109 101 1.08 A Co-58 pCi 87.6 83.5 1.05 A Mn-54 pCi 133 123 1.08 A Fe-59 pCi 113 106 1.07 A Zn-65 pCi 226 210 1.08 A Co-60 pCi 185 176 1.05 A E10068 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 92.8 94.2 0.99 A E10070 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1800 1570 1.15 A June 2012 E10198 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 86.1 99.8 0.86 A Sr-90 pCi/L 9.2 12.7 0.72 W E10199 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 88.9 99.7 0.89 A Ce-141 pCi/L 72.8 82.2 0.89 A Cr-51 pCi/L 394 402 0.98 A Cs-134 pCi/L 159 174 0.91 A Cs-137 pCi/L 206 212 0.97 A Co-58 pCi/L 89.5 92.3 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/L 129 132 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 129 128 1.01 A Zn-65 pCi/L 193 199 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 342 355 0.96 A E10201 AP Ce-141 pCi 73.2 75.1 0.97 A Cr-51 pCi 367 366 1.00 A Cs-1 34 pCi 165 159 1.04 A Cs-137 pCi 205 193 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 84.7 84.2 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 118 121 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi 125 117 1.07 A Zn-65 pCi 181 182 0.99 A Co-60 pCi 338 324 1.04 A E10200 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 101 96.6 1.05 A D-1

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2012 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

June 2012 E10202 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1890 1580 1.20 A September2012 E10296 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 106 99.6 1.06 A Sr-90 pCi/L 13.6 16.0 0.85 A E10297 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 89.8 99.6 0.90 A Ce-141 pCi/L 160 164 0.98 A Cr-51 pCi/L 230 248 0.93 A Cs-134 pCi/L 101 108 0.94 A Cs-137 pCi/L 174 174 1.00 A Co-58 pCi/L 97.2 100 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/L 188 196 0.96 A Fe-59 pCi/L 159 152 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 195 192 1.02 A Co-60 pCi/L 155 152 1.02 A El 0299 AP Ce-141 pCi 145 135 1.07 A Cr-51 pCi 219 205 1.07 A Cs-1 34 PCi 94.1 89.4 1.05 A Cs-1 37 pCi 140 144 0.97 A Co-58 pCi 88.3 83.0 1.06 A Mn-54 pCi 173 162 1.07 A Fe-59 pCi 136 125 1.09 A Zn-65 pCi 165 159 1.04 A Co-60 pCi 133 125 1.06 A E10298 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 95.5 97.2 0.98 A E10300 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1630 1900 0.86 A December 2012 E10334 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 101 96.6 1.05 A Sr-90 pCi/L 11.3 13.8 0.82 A E10335 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 93.1 90.0 1.03 A Ce-141 pCi/L 52.5 51.0 1.03 A Cr-51 pCi/L 373 348 1.07 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 157 165 0.95 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 113 117 0.97 A Co-58 pCi/L 94.1 98.5 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 116 116 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi/L 124 116 1.07 A Zn-65 pCi/L 190 186 1.02 A Co-60 pCi/L 172 170 1.01 A E10337A AP Ce-141 pCi 51.8 49.6 1.04 A Cr-51 pCi 372 338 1.10 A Cs-134 pCi 165 161 1.02 A Cs-137 pCi 113 114 0.99 A Co-58 pCi 96.5 95.8 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 118 112 1.05 A Fe-59 pCi 105 112 0.94 A Zn-65 pCi 166 181 0.92 A Co-60 pCi 179 165 1.08 A D-2

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2012 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

December 2012 E10336 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 73.1 72.7 1.01 A E10333 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1550 1750 0.89 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreportedresult.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetricand/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineeringto Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluationbased on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reportedresult falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of< 0.70 and > 1.30.

D-3

TABLE D-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2012 (PAGE I OF 1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation (c)

May 2012 RAD-89 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 63.4 58.5 46.9 - 66.3 A Sr-90 pCi/L 33.5 37.4 27.4 - 43.1 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 89.2 82.3 69.1 - 90.5 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 66.5 74.2 60.6- 81.6 A Cs-137 pCi/L 152 155 140-172 A Co-60 pCi/L 73.3 72.9 65.6 - 82.6 A Zn-65 pCi/L 109 105 94.5- 125 A Gr-A pCi/L 82.4 62.9 33.0 - 78.0 N (1)

Gr-B pCi/L 43.6 44.2 29.6 - 51.5 A 1-131 pCi/L 25.9 27.1 22.5 - 31.9 A H-3 pCi/L 15433 15800 13800 - 17400 A MRAD-1 6 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 39.5 77.8 26.1 - 121 A November, 2012 RAD-91 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 46.5 39.1 29.7 - 46.1 N (2)

Sr-90 pCi/L 16.6 20.1 14.4 -23.8 A Ba-133 pCi/L 85.2 84.8 71.3 - 93.3 A Cs-134 pCi/L 76.9 76.6 62.6 - 84.3 A Cs-137 pCi/L 177 183 165-203 A Co-60 pCi/L 77.4 78.3 70.5 - 88.5 A Zn-65 pCi/L 209 204 184-240 A Gr-A pCi/L 50.6 58.6 30.6 - 72.9 A Gr-B pCi/L 59.3 39.2 26.0 - 46.7 N (2) 1-131 pCi/L 22.9 24.8 20.6 - 29.4 A H-3 pCi/L 5020 4890 4190-5380 A MRAD-17 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 59.6 87.5 29.3- 136 A (1) Detector G1 is slightly biased high for Th-230 based measurements used only for ERA Gross Alpha samples. NCR 12-05 (2) The Sr-89 found to known ratio was 1. 19, which TBE considers acceptable. It appearsthe aliquot was entered incorrectly for the Gross Beta NCR 12-13 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standard-asdetermined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) ERA evaluation:A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the ControlLimits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the ControlLimits and outside of the Warning Limit.

D-4

TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2012 (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

March 2012 12-MaW26 Water Cs-1 34 Bq/L -0.0045 (1) A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 37.5 39.9 27.9 -51.9 A Co-57 Bq/L 30.8 32.9 23.0 -42.8 A Co-60 Bq/L 22.4 23.72 16.60-30.84 A H-3 Bq/L 456 437 306-568 A Mn-54 Bq/L 31.0 31.8 22.3-41.3 A K-40 Bq/L 144 142 99-185 A Sr-90 Bq/L -0.0084 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/L -0.369 (1) A 12-GrW26 Water Gr-A Bq/L 2.06 2.14 0.64-3.64 A Gr-B Bq/L 7.48 6.36 3.18-9.54 A 12-MaS26 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 831 828 580-1076 A Cs-1 37 Bq/kg 0.145 (1) A Co-57 Bq/kg 1270 1179 825-1533 A Co-60 Bq/kg 7.61 1.56 (2) N (3)

Mn-54 Bq/kg 634 558 391 -725 A K-40 Bq/kg 1690 1491 1044-1938 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 328 392 274-540 A Zn-65 Bq/kg 753 642 449-835 A 12-RdF26 AP Cs-134 Bq/sample 2.31 2.38 1.67 - 3.09 A Cs-137 Bq/sample 2.15 1.79 1.25-2.33 W Co-57 Bq/sample -0.0701 (1) A Co-60 Bq/sample 2.62 2.182 1.527-2.837 W Mn-54 Bq/sample 4.13 3.24 2.27 - 4.21 W Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.0185 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/sample 4.19 2.99 2.09 - 3.89 N (3) 12-GrF26 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.365 1.2 0.4-2.0 A Gr-B Bq/sample 2.31 2.4 1.2-3.6 A 12-RdV26 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 8.72 8.43 5.90 - 10.96 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 0.0424 (1) A Co-57 Bq/sample 15.5 12.0 8.4- 15.6 W Co-60 Bq/sample 6.80 6.05 4.24 - 7.87 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 0.0057 (1) A Sr-90 Bq/sample 2.24 2.11 1.48-2.74 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 10.5 8.90 6.23 - 11.57 A September 2012 12-MaW27 Water Cs-1 34 Bq/L 21.4 23.2 16.2 - 30.2 A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 17.0 16.7 11.7-21.7 A Co-57 Bq/L 28.7 29.3 20.5 - 38.1 A Co-60 Bq/L 0.179 (1) A H-3 Bq/L 387 334 234-434 A Mn-54 Bq/L 18.1 17.8 12.5-23.1 A K-40 Bq/L 139 134 94-174 A Sr-90 Bq/L 19.6 12.2 8.5- 15.9 N (4)

Zn-65 Bq/L 27.2 25.9 18.1 - 33.7 A 12-GrW27 Water Gr-A Bq/L 0.966 1.79 0.54 - 3.04 A Gr-B Bq/L 10.0 9.1 4.6- 13.7 A D-5

TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

September 2012 12-MaS27 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 880 939 657-1221 A Cs-1 37 Bq/kg 1220 1150 805-1495 A Co-57 Bq/kg 1330 1316 921-1711 A Co-60 Bq/kg 552 531 372-690 A Mn-54 Bq/kg 1000 920 644-1196 A K-40 Bq/kg 674 632 442-822 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 528 508 356-660 A Zn-65 Bq/kg 665 606 424-788 A 12-RdF27 AP Cs-134 Bq/sample 2.760 2.74 1.92-3.56 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 0.0415 (1) A Co-57 Bq/sample 2.00 191.00 1.34-2.48 A Co-60 Bq/sample 1.78 1.728 1.210 - 2.246 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 2.40 2.36 1.65 - 3.07 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.931 1.03 0.72-1.34 A Zn-65 Bq/sample -0.688 (1) A 12-GrF27 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.434 0.97 0.29- 1.65 A Gr-B Bq/sample 1.927 1.92 0.96 - 2.88 A 12-RdV27 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 6.28 6.51 4.56 - 8.46 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 4.62 4.38 3.07 - 5.69 A Co-57 Bq/sample 6.51 5.66 3.96 - 7.36 A Co-60 Bq/sample 5.32 5.12 3.58 - 6.66 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 3.59 3.27 2.29 - 4.25 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.0012 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/sample -0.046 (1) A (1) False positive test (2) Sensitivity evaluation (3) No cause was found for the failed high soil Co-60 sensitivity test or the high Zn-65 in AP, which TBE considers an anomaly. NCR 12-08 (4) Sr-90 in water high due to incorrect aliquot entered in LIMS. 12-11 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reportedresult.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) DOE/MAPEPevaluation:A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

D-6