IR 05000424/1980010
| ML19330C271 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 07/01/1980 |
| From: | Hunt M, Rausch J, Matt Thomas NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19330C261 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-424-80-10, 50-425-80-10, NUDOCS 8008080158 | |
| Download: ML19330C271 (5) | |
Text
..
-[
- o UNITED STATES
-8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
$
E REGION 11
- #
7 \\
o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100
\\.,,/.
ATLANTA, GEORGtA 303o3 o
JUL 3 1960 Report Nos. 50-424/80-10 and 50-425/80-10 Licensee: Georgia Power Company 270 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30303 Facility Name:
Plant Vogtle Docket Nos. 50-424 and 50-425 License Nos. CPPR-108 and CPPR-109 Inspection at Vogtle site near Waynesboro, Georgia Inspectors:
k e-,m
_ Q /E. > /f, Munt' # ~~
[lf b-on[di.
Date Signed
"
W / - 3' u M. Thomah Date Signed
-
hJW~
C
'% [7 Approved by: y K. Raussh', Acting,Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection on Jt$ne 10-12, 1980 Areas Inspected.
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 46 inspector-hours on site in the areas of noncompli.nce, concrete placement, material receipt and storage, reactor vessel nozzle inspection, concrete lab and batch plant, licensee identified items, and inspector followup items.
Results Of the seven areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviation were identi-
' fied in six areas; one item of nonco:apliance was found in one area (Deficiency -
Receipt Inspection Procedures, paragraph 5).
'
153 8008o80
_
,-
-
. - -
.
L \\
s DETAILS s-1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- K. M. Gillespie, Project Construction Manager
- H. H. Gregory, III, Assistant Project Construction Manager
.
- C. R. Miles, Jr., QA Field Supervisor
- W. R. Rountree, Mechanical QC Supervisor
- M. H. Googe, Assistant Manager, QC
- R. Osborne, Mechanical QC
- D. Pittman, Mechanical QC Inspection Supervisor
- E. L. Palmer, Drawing Control Supervisor l
- D.-A. Klinger, Senior QA Field Representative
- D. B. Ray, Mechanical Project Section Supervisor
- F. C. Warren, Electrical QC J. Mcdonald, Assistant Warehouse Supervisor dther licensee employees contacted included ten technicians, and five office personnel.
Other Organizations i
Bechtel Power Corporation (BCP)
- J. E. Mah1meister, Project Engineer
- Z. Yazdani, Geotech Engineer Walsh Construction Company (WCC)
i
- F. R. McCarty, Project Manager
- G. S. Wisen, QC Coordinator
'* Attended exit interview
.
I 2.
Exit Interview I
The. inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 12, 1980 with l
those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged I
the noncompliance ' noted in paragraph 5.
Fully approved documentation
'
including revised procedures were presented by the licensee assuring that
!
drawings required for the material receipt inspection will be made available.
,
!'
The inspectors informed the licensee that the actions taken were adequate and no response would be required.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings-i (Closed) Deficiency,- 424/425/79-17-01, Failure to report deficiency in backfill - The licensee's response dated December 27, 1979 outlined the
1 j.
C.
-
- - - -
.,
-
_-
..
.a..
g,
-
.
Je
.
'
-
-2-
$-
-
icorrective-' actions taken to_ insure: reporting of. deficiencies as defined-in'
- 10 CFR l50.55(e).
The' inspector also - reviewed Field Procedure GD-A-06, Rev. 3, which reflected a complete. rewrite to_ insure adequate reporting.
-4.
Unresolved Items
.
Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
'
5.
Independent Inspection (Units I and 2)
r The inspectors performed a walk-through inspection of Units 1 and 2 reactor-buildings, the auxiliary" building, ~ concrete lab and batch plant, level D
. storage 4 yards, and levels A&B. storage in warehouses. ' Areas inspected included construction : activities, _ calibration of laboratory scales and testing equipment, aggregate sampling, concrete placement A-08C-003, and QA audits.
.The inspectors conducted an inspection of level D_ storage yards and levels A&B storage in warehouses. ' Areas inspected included proper assignment of
. storage L levels,. control. 'of hold and/or nonconforming items, receiving
. inspection records, and identificatio_n of stored material. Items placed on hold-(due'to either lack of documentation, a nonconforming condition, or
~
~ item inspection) are clearly. marked and tagged as such, and then recorded in the Hold Tag Log. While reviewing the Hold Tag Log and receiving inspec-
~ tion reports,- the inspectors found safety-related equipment was' on " hold" (up to six months).'for lack of inspection in. order to verify compliance
-
- with ivendor ; drawings. -In each case the drawings had not been received on site,iwhich ' prevented completion of the - receipt inspection.
Following further review by the inspectors,.it was learned that an "open report log" is' maintained by each Quality Control':(QC) section and a monthly status is given on open receiving inspection ' reports, along with an explanation of
_
why the report is-open..The 'following are examples of open or incomplete receiving inspection reports.due to__ lack of vendor drawings:
'
-Report Nos.
Date Material Received
'5293R~
01-23-80 5295R-01-25-80 6091R, 6092R, 6093R,.6106R 01-08-80-6891R,16893R 12-21-79
'
- After. discussions'with site personnel and review of Plant Vogtle Procedures DC-A-01', fDrawing Control,. DC-A-06, Document. Control, and GD-A-30, Receipt,
. Receipt Inspection; Storage and 'Eandling,. the' inspector found that the
, aforementioned procedures ' do not l establish responsibility.for obtaining
':vendorfdrawings.1This item is a deficiency identified as 424/425/80-10-01, L
" Receipt Inspection Procedure".. The inspectors discussed this finding with responsible licensee personnel and immediate action was 'taken to correct the^ problem. : Procedure'DC-A-Olihas'been-revised delineating responsiblity.
~
to Document' Control personnel. for obtaining vendor drawings, after notifica-a tion byf appropriate QC and/or' Field L0perations Engineering personnel.- No a
,
,
.L
.
_
,
-
M
_: 1..
' *"
e
-
4-3-g-written response is required.
This item is opened and closed in this report.
-The inspectors reviewed receipt inspection, storage, and maintenance inspec-tion records for the following safety-related pumps:
~ Centrifugal Charging Pump Mark Tag # 2-1208-P6-001 Centrifugal Charging Pump.
Mark Tag # 2-1208-P6-002 Safety Injection Pump Mark Tag # 2-1208-P6-003 Safety Injection Pump Mark Tag # 2-1208-P6-004 Records for storage and maintenance show that inspections are being performed regularly and in accordance with procedure GD-T-09, Inspection of Items-in Storage and Storage Areas. While reviewing receipt inspection records for pump 2-1208-P6-001, the inspector found that the pump and motor arrived coupled together on May 6, 1980. The mechanical QC section performed the receipt -inspection on the pump.
However, records showed that receipt inspection had not been performed on the motor by electrical QC. This shows lack of coordination and interface between mechanical and electrical QC a
when equipment arrives either coupled together or on the same shipping o'rder, which requires receipt inspection by both sections. After further review and discussions with site personnel, the inspectors found that this problem area was also identified in QA audit WH01-80/15, " Audit of Warehouse and Storage Activities".
This item is identified as inspector follow-up item 424/425/80-10-02, " Receipt Inspection Interface".
6.
Licensee Identified Items (LII),10 CFR 50.55(e)
(Closed) LII 425/80-04-01, Undermining o~f the Unit 2 control building electrical tunnel foundation. The licensee submitted a final report April 30, 1980. The repair work in this area has been observed by several inspectors during the various stages of repair. The damaged area was at elevation 150' 6".
Backfill has now been placed in this area and the surrounding area to an elevation of 156' and service water controls have been established.
(Open) LII 424/425/80-10-03, Potential for centrifugal charging pumps to self distruct..The licensee reported that they are investigating this condition as the result of notification by the NSSS vendor that a Part 21 report had been ~ filed with the NRC.
7.
Reactor Vessel (RV) Nozzle Safe End Inspection During.this inspection representatives -for the NSSS supplier (Westinghouse Electric Corporation (W)) and the vessel fabricator (Combustion Engineering
'(CE)) were examining the reactor vessel (RV) outlet nozzles. The examina-tion' consisted of etching the outlet nozzles weld preps to determine the thickness of _ the weld safe end. All etching and examination was performed
_
by the; W'and CE representatives in accordance with procedures supplied by W. All work was observed by the = licensee. Documentation of the inspection was prepared and will be maintained by the licensee.
l
(:.
-
-m
.
- .*.
1-
e.
The: inspectors were advised that the least acceptable thickness was 1/2".
The least thickness measured on any safe 'end was 17/32" on.one.section of
- nozzle identified as_B-8310-4 on RV1. The inspectors were advised that-1/4". was. actually acceptable but would require reevaluation to determine the welding procedure to be used.
' In the areas examined, no items of noncompliance or deviation were identified.
8.
' IE Bulletin (IEB)
(Closed) IEB 79-13, 79-21, 79-27, 80-04 and.80-06. The listed IEBs either do 'not apply to Plant Vogtle or do not require an answer due to the phase
~
of construction.
(Closed) IEB 80-03.
The licensee advised RII on April 20, 1980 that the
.
charcoal filters listed in this bulletin will not be used at Plant Vogtle.
'
.
O e
%
,
.'-
.- - _ _
- -