IR 05000416/1979022
| ML19253C450 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1979 |
| From: | Conlon T, Gibbons T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19253C431 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-79-22, 50-417-79-22, NUDOCS 7912050596 | |
| Download: ML19253C450 (4) | |
Text
.
'o, UNITED STATES
!
7, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
g q[r 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 o,
g ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303
OCT 2 41979 Report Nos. 50-416/79-22 and 50-417/79-22 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Post Office Box 1640 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Facility Name:
Grand Gulf Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416 a2d 50-417 License Nos. CPPR-113 and CPPR-119 Inspection at Grand Gulf Site near Port Gibson, Mississippi Inspector:
[
@
/d - jZ,(- 7[
T. D. Gibbons Date Signed Approved by:
[
/O-23-7f T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Signed SUMMARY Inspection On September 25-28, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 27 inspector hours onsite in the areas of Instrumentation Work and Work Activities, Quality Records.
Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
1503 170 7912050 [ 7 6
.
.
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- H. D. Morgan, Construction Superintendent
.
- B. C. Lee, QA Representative
- H. S. Pyle, QA Representative J. C. Fuller, Acting QA Field Supervisor Other Organizations Y. W. Yelverton, QA Engineer, Bechtel Power Corporation J. R. Valdez, QA Engineer, Bechtel Power Corporation
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 28, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action On Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort (Units 1 and 2)
The inspector observed the raceway installation in various areas of the plant to assure that the installation conformed to the requirements of the installation procedures. The protection of installed electrical equipment was observed in the auxiliary building including heating of large motors.
The inspector questioned accessability of some embedded conduit sleeves on elevation 140 of the auxiliary building which appear to be blocked by ductwork. The licensee is evaluating this item.
W~ thin the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.
1503 17i
.
-2-
~
6.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems I) Observation of Work and Work Activities (Units 1)
The inspector selected the following instruments which were being installed.
The installations were not complete nor inspected by licensee QC. The instruments selected were:
SZ51-FT-N019B - Control Room Unit B Fresh Air Flow
,
SZ51-FT-N017B - Control Room Unit B Fresh Air Flow IP42-FT-N041A - Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger In Flow IP2-FT-N041B - Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger In Flow IP42-FT-N042A - Fuel Fool Heat Exclenger In Flow IP42-FT-N042B - Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger in Flow The installations were reviewed to assure that the installation was in accordance to the instrument detail drawings J-0166 Revision 3, and J0116F Revision 0.
The tubing and supports were installed by the following drawings.
FSK-I-0049-014D - Revision 2 FSK-I-0049-013D - Revision 2 FSK-I-026-010V - Revision 4 FSK-I-0126-020V - Revision 1 FSK-I-0126-095V - Revision 0 FSK-I-01276-010V - Revision 2 FSK-I-0127G-822-D - Revision 1 FSK-I-0127G-823-D - Revision 1 FSK-I-0126-023-V - Revision 2 FSK-I-126-025V - Revision 2 FSK-I-0127G-842B - Revision 1 FSK-I-1063A-015B - Revision 2 FSK-I-1063A-016B - Revision 2 FSK-I-1063A-020B - Revision 3 FSK-I-1063A-320B - Revision 1 FSK-I-0126-010V - Revision 4 FSK-I-0126-020V - Revision 1 FSK-I-0126-065V - Revision 0 FSK-I-0127G-010V - Revision 2 FSK-I-0127G-843B - Revision 1 FSK-I-0122G-844B - Revision 1 FSK-I-0127G-845B - Revision 2 FSK-I-1063A-013B - Revision 1 FSK-I-1063A-012B - Revision 1 FSK-I-1063A-022A - Revision 0 1503 172
.
-3-
The inspector examined the location, mounting installation techniques, seismic supports, line slopes, protection and identification.
The instal-lations are not complete so only the installed hardware was examined.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.
7.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems I) Review of Quality Records
.
The instruments identified in paragraph 6 were examined to assure that the QAM requirements were met in the areas of receiving inspection and vendor certification.
The records consisted of receiving inspection reports, certified test reports, certificate of compliance and seismic test report.
The seismic listing was conducted at Wylie Laboratories at Huntsville Alabama for Rosemont Incorporated and documented on RMT Report 127516, Revision B, dated December 11, 1975.
The inspector examined fifteen Nonconformance reports (NCR) and five condition reports (CR) involving the instrumentation. The NCR's were 4129, 3682, 3626, 4033, 4034, 3237, 3817, 3458, 3726, 3372, 3756, 3617, 3823, 3586, and 3540.
The CR's were 2194, 2195, 205, 2050, and 2220. The NCR's and CR's were examined to assure that the QAM requirements were met in the areas of status, legibility, Quality review and retrievability. The inspec-tor reviewed several Bechtel Quality Surveillance Reports documenting source inspection at the Riely Company, Fisher Controls and Thermo Electric.
Within the areas examined there were no items of noncompliance identified.
1503 173