IR 05000416/1979017
| ML19250A309 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf  |
| Issue date: | 09/07/1979 |
| From: | Bryant J, Rausch J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19250A305 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-416-79-17, 50-417-79-17, NUDOCS 7910230031 | |
| Download: ML19250A309 (3) | |
Text
.
o UNITED STATES 8 ~ g( 'k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
.r REGION il
'
f 101 MARIETTA sT., N.W., sulTE 31Co
.g..h"
>
[
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 3o3o3
...
Report Nos. 50-416/79-17 and 50-417/79-17 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light Company Jackson, Mississippi Facility Name:
Grand Gulf, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-416 and 50-417 License Nos. CPPR-118 and CPPR-119 Inspection at Gran Gulf site near Port Gibson, Mississippi u/[
f ' 7' 7 Inspector: 2 /
ne
.
f. K/Rausch Date Signea_
App d by:
ges
// 7h'7
. ~BryhtQ'Section Chief, RCES Branch Date Sig'ned SUMMARY Inspection on August 20-22, 1979
,
Areas Inspected This special, announced inspection involved 18 inspector-hours on-site in the areas of construction progress, review of design and engineering effort status, procurement activities, craft work force review and warehousing.
Results Of the areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations wcre identified.
ll.19 05/
.
7910230 D g
,
DETAILS
Pr
.s Contacted Licensee Employees
- N. L. Stampley, Vice President of Production
- T. E. Reaves, QA Manager
- J. C. Fuller. QA Representative
- W. E. Edge, OA Program and Audits Coordinetor
- H. D. Morgan, Construction Supervisor Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included construction craftsmen and office personnel.
Other Organizations
- J. W. Yelverton, Bechtel QA Engineer
- Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 22, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph I abeve.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (0 pen) Unresolved Item Nos. 416/417/79-13-04, Housekeeping.
The inspector noted that the licensee has corrected the trash and litter problem both inside and outside the containment. Tor the most part, trash cans are being utilized by the workers anJ a definite trend toward neater working areas u s noted by the inspector.
This item will remain open until procedures defining the boundaries of regional cleanliness zones are revised and approved. This item will be examined during subsequent inspections.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during tnis inspection.
5.
Inspector Foilowup Items (Closed) IFI 416/417/79-13-01, Warehouse Storage. The warehouses located in Natchez, Mississippi, which are used to store both safety-related and other materials, were inspected.
It was noted tht the material and equipment are being stored and preserved -
satisfactorily. Segregation of Mississippi Power and Light Company (MP&L) storage from storage not owned by MP&L is effective.
1199 038
,
-2-
,
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Independent Inspection The inspector examined various areas of Units 1 and 2 to observe construction work and related activities in progress, to inspect the general state of maintenance and the inplace storage conditions of mechanical and electrical equipment. The inspector examined the rigging that was being constructed to move the Unit 2 reactor vessel from storage into the Unit 1 containment.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
General The writer accompanied W. Lovelace and J. Houghton, Light Water Reactors Branch No. 1, Division of Project Management, Nuclear Reactor Regulation, during an announced visit on August 21, 1979 to discuss overall project status and detailed project schedule.
In addition, construction activities in progress were observed in order to evaluate the Unit 1 fuel load date.
Bechtel presented an overview of construction progress since June 1,1978. The presenta-tion included a review and current status of construction, procure-ment and engineering. The licensee provided a review of all startup functions presently underway which included writing procedures, hiring startup engineers, plant engineering, flushing systems and componentTs in service.
Follow _ng the presentations and review, a tour was made of the site to observe construction activities.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
llU) ()J /<O
/-
-.