IR 05000400/1989007
| ML18005A882 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/19/1989 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18005A881 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-400-89-07, 50-400-89-7, NUDOCS 8905030456 | |
| Download: ML18005A882 (13) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION II
101 MAR I ETTA ST R E ET, N.W.
ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30323 Report No.:
50-400/89-07 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company P. 0.
Box 1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Docket No.:
50-400 Facility Name:
Harris
Inspection Conducted:
March 27-31, 1989 License No.:
NPF-63 Inspector:
J.
P. Harris ate,Signed Approved by:
T.
onion, Section Chief Pl'ant Systems Section Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Safety Date Signed Scope:
SUMMARY This routine, unannounced inspection was conducted in the areas of fire protection/prevention and follow-up on previously identified inspections items.
Results:
In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.
During this inspection, the licensee was very cooperative in providing the inspector with applicable procedures, records and walkdown inspection of fire protection equipment and response to previously identified items.
No weaknesses were identified during this inspection.
P Q5Q3Q4 Q5QQQ4QQ cg +9Q421 POP POLACK PDC
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
"C. S.
Bohanan, Operations Support
- J.
M. Coll'ins, Manager, Operations
"C. S. Hinnant, Plant Manager
"J.
Hammond, Director - ONS
"J. Nobles, Fire Protection, OPS Technician
- A. Pullian, Senior Specialist, gA
"R. Richey, Site Manager
- M. Stokes, Senior Specialist Fire Protection
"D. Tibbits, Director, Regulatory Compliance
- M. Wallace, Senior Specialist, Regulatory Compliance Other
)icensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers, operators, mechanics, security force members, technicians;.and administrative personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
'%.
H. Bradford
"Attended exit interview 2.
Fire Protection/Prevention Program (64704)
a.
Fire Prevention/Administrative Control Procedures The inspector reviewed the following fire prevention/administrative procedures:
Procedure No.
Title FPP-01 Revision
FPP-02 Revision
FPP-03 Revision
FPP-04 Revision
FPP-05 Revision
FPP-06 Revision
FPP-07 Revision
FPP-08 Revision
FPP-010 Revision
Fire Protection Conduct of Operations Fire Emergency Fire Investigation Report Control of Transient Combustibles Duties of a Fire Watch Control of Ignition Sources Hot Work Permit Control of Flammable Liquids Physical Requirements for Fire Brigade Fire Protection Housekeeping
Procedure No.
cont d
Title FPP-011 Revision
FPP-012 Revision
FPP-013 Revision
FPP-014 Revision
FPP-015 Revision
OMM-003, Revision
Explosive Materials Safety Fire Preplans Fire Protection Minimum Requirements and Mitigating Actions Fire Protection Surveillance Requirements Temporary Fire Seals Equipment Inoperable Record Based on this review it appears that all of the above procedures meet the NRC guidelines of NUREG-'0800, Section 9.5. 1
"Standard Review Plan" fire protection.
b.
Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System Surveillance Procedures:
Procedure No.
FTP"3001, Revision
FTP-3002, Revision
FPT-3003, Revision
FPT-3005, Revision
FPT-3007, Revision
FPT-3009, Revision
FPT-3104, Revision
FPT-3105, Revision
FPT-3302, Revision
FPT-3123, Revision
FPT-3129, Revision
FPT-3306, Revision
Title Motor Driven Main Fire Pump Operability Test Fire Main Valve Position Verification, Monthly Interval Fire Suppression Valve Cycle Test Year ly Fire Suppression Non-accessible Valve Cycle Test, 18 Month Interval Hydrant'ose House Visual Inspection Monthly Interval
'Fire Hydrant Flow Test Annual Interval Hose Rack Inspection Fuel Handling Building, Monthly Interval Hose Rack Inspection Diesel Generator Building Monthly Interval Main Drain Test Auxiliary Building quarterly Interval Hose Valve Operability Test Fuel Handling Building, Three Year Interval Fire Hose Valve Operability Test Containment, Three Year Interval Main Drain Test Fuel Oil Storage, quarterly Interval
Procedure No.
cont Title FPT-3307, Revision I FPT-3430, Revision
FPT-3500, Revision
FPT-3503, Revision
FPT-3504, Revision
FPT-3560, Revision
FPT-3201, Revision
FPT-3213, Revision
FPT-3214, Revision
FPT-3217, Revision
FPT-3203, Revision
FPT-3IZO, Revision
Main Drain Test Diesel Generator Building quarter ly Interval Fire Damper Inspection 18 Month Interval RAB 190, 216, 305 and 332 Elevation Fire Door Check Daily Fire Door Monitor Trip Activating Device Operating Test Panel 3,
Monthly Interval Fire Door Inspection Waste Processing Building, Semiannual Interval Fire Wrap Inspection, 18 Month Interval Fire Detection Functional Test, Local Fire Detection Panel 6,
Month Interval Fire Detection Functional Test, Local Fire Detection Panel 13, 6 Month Interval Fire Detection Functional Test Local Fire Detection Panel 14; 6 Month Interval Fire Detection Functional Test Local Fire Detection Panel 17,
'
Month Interval Fire Detection Functional Test Local Fire Detection Panel 3,
Month Interval Fire Hose Valve Operability Test Auxiliary Building, 3 Year Interva'l The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement the surveillance requirements of the plant's fire protection program and FSAR.
In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection program guidelines and the guidelines of the National Fire Protection Associated NFPA Fire Codes.
Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures are satisfactory.
c.
Fire Protection System Surveillance Inspections and Tests The inspector reviewed the following surveillance inspection and test records for the dates indicated:
Procedure No.
Results Reviewed FPT"3001 FPT-3002 FPT-3007 FPT"3104 FPT-3105 FPT-3505 FPT-3503 FPT-3504 FPT-3550 FPT.-3430 FPT"3506 FPT-3302 FPT-3306 FPT-3213 FPT-3217 FPT.-3203 FPT-3201 FPT"3213 Weekly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Daily Monthly Semi-Annual Eighteen Month Interval Eighteen Month Interval Semi-Annual Quarterly Quarterly Six Month Interval Six Month Interval Six Month Interval Six Month Interval Six Month Interval 10/24/88 to 03/23/89 09/19/88 to 03/20/89 ll/07/88 to 03/15/89 ll/23/88 to 03/15/89 12/05/88 to 03/21/89 03/01/89 to 03/28/89 01/05/88 to 02/28/89 03/15/88, 10/13/88, 03/21/89 06/08/88, 10/13/88 04/25/88 03/17/99, 9/17/88 10/12/88 02/05/88 to 02/03/89 04/18/88 to 02/05/89 11/30/88 to 03/4/88 03/01/88 to 11/09/88 02/16/88 to ll/14/88 08/19/88 to 03/24/89 03/04/88 to 11/30/89 The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance test/inspections were found to be sati sfactory with regard to'meeting the requi rements of the plant's Fire Protection Procedures.
Fire protection Audit:
The most recent audit,and surveillance reports of the Harris Fire Protection program were reviewed.
These audits were:
QA Surveil lance Report 88-173 ll/02/88 to 01/20/89 QA Surveillance Report 89-024 Ol/16/89 to 02/07/89 QA Surveillance Report 88-089 06/07/88 QA Surveillance Report 88-049 03/ll/88 QA Surveillance Report 88-044 03/15/88 to 03/22/88 QA Surveillance Report 88-026 02/15/88 to 02/16/88 QA Surveillance Report 88-022 02/09/88 to 02/10/88 QA Surveillance Report 88-018 02/08/88 to 02/09/88 QAA/0022-88-02 03/21-25/88 QAA/0022-89-01 03/06"10/89 These audits identified several fire protection program discrepancies a'nd unresolved items, and recommended several program improvements.
The licensee has either implemented the corrective action associated with these audit findings or a scheduled date for completion of the corrective actions has been established.
The licensee appears to be taken the appropriate corrective actions on these audit finding JI
Fire Brigade (I)
Organization The total station fire brigade is composed of approximately
personnel from the operations and radwaste staff.
The on duty shift brigade
'leader is normally one of the licensed operators and the remaining four fire brigade members are composed of operators and r adwaste personnel.
The inspector reviewed the on duty shifts for the follow dates and verified that sufficient qualified fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet the provisions of the plants Final Safety Analysis Report:
March 27, 1989 March 28, 1989 March 29, 1989 (2)
Training The inspector reviewed the training and drill records for seven brigade leaders and twelve brigade members for 1988 and 1989.
The-records reviewed indicated that each of these leaders and members had received and attended the required training and participated in the required number of drills.
The inspector also verified that a fire brigade drill'had been conducted every
days for each shift for.1988 and 1989.
The fire brigade training records that. were reviewed were Wound satisfactory.
In addition, the inspector reviewed the licensee s initial fire brigade training program to verify that the following training topics are being covered:
Indoctrination of the plant fire fighting plan with specific identification of each individuals'esponsibilities.
Identification of the type and location of fire hazards and associated types of fires that could occur in the plant.
The toxic and corrosive characteristics of expected products of combustion.
Identification of the location of fire fighting equipment for each fire area and fami liarization with the layout of the plant, including access and egress route to each area.
The proper use of available fire fighting equipment and the correct method of fighting each type of fire.
The types of fires should include fires in energized electrical
equipment, fires in cables and cable trays, hydrogen fires, fires involving flammable and combustible liquids or hazardous process chemical s, fire resulting from construction of modifications (welding),
and record file fires.
The proper use of communication, lighting, ventilation and emergency breathing equipment.
The proper method for fighting fires inside buildings and confined spaces.
The direction and. coordination of the fire fighting activities (fire brigade leaders only).
Detailed review of fire fighting strategies and procedures.
Review of the latest plant modifications and corresponding changes in fire fighting plans.
Based on this review, it appears that the licensee's initial fire brigade training program cover s the above required training topics.
In addition, it appears that the licensee's fire brigade training program repeats the basic fire fighting skills of the initial program to qualified fire brigade members every two years.
(3)
Fire Brigade Fire Fighting Strategies The inspector reviewed the following plant fire fighting strategies:
Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone Fire Zone 5-F"1-TKA/FAB E1216 5-F" 1 TKB/FAB E1216 5-F-1-C1/FAB E1216 5-F-1-AA1/FAB E1216 1-A-L COME/DGB EL261 1-A46 ST/DGB EL261 1-D-DGB ER/RAB EL261 1"D"1-DGA ER/RAB EL261 1-0-DGB ER/RAB EL261 1-A-4/CHFA/RAB 261 1-A"4 COME/RAB 261 1-A-EPA/RAB 261 2"A-4 COME/RAB 261 Based on this review, the inspector determined that the above fire fighting strategies adequately addressed the fire hazards in the area, the type of fire extingui shants to be utilized, the direction of attack, systems in the room/area to be managed in
(4)
order to reduce fire damage heat sensitive equipment in the room/area, and specific fire brigade duties with regard to smoke control and salvage.
Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced fire brigade drill.
The drill scenario was an electrical cord shorted out, causing transient combustibles to catch fire in the Waste Processing Building Room 144B 261 Elevation.
Six fire brigade members responded to the pending fire emergency in full protective fire fighting turnout clothing and self contained breathing apparatus.
The scene leader established a
command position and notified the control room and sent in a
Recon team to size up the fire.
The Recon team reported that the fire is in an area that is a contaminated storage area.
The scene leader used a pre-fire plan to determine the plan of action.
A l-l/2 inch fire attack hose line was advanced into
. the area.
The fire attack hose lines were placed in service and the fire was placed under control in ten minutes.
The fire brigade utilized proper manual firefighting methods and reacted to the fire drill scenario in an effective and efficient manner.
However, the team was cautioned about a
backup line being needed during the attack.
Also, radio communications were poor.
The fire protection technician indicated that use of a backup hose line would be discussed in quarterly training.
f.
Plant Tour and Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment Outside Fire Protection Walkdown The inspector verified that the two fire pump suction intake structures from the Harris lake were in service.
The electric and diesel fire pumps were inspected and found to be in service.
The diesel driven fire pump contained
. approximately 400 gallons of fuel which met the requirements of procedure FPP-014.
The inspector al,so observed a weekly test of the Electric and Diesel Driven Fire Pumps.
The following sectional control valves in the outside fire protection water supply system were inspected and verified to be proper ly aligned, locked
. and electrically supervised in position.
3FP-6 3FP-25 3FP-24 3FP-91 3FP-123 3FP-125
3FP"30 3FP"81 3FP"82 3FP"88 3FP-89 3FP-126 3FP-129 3FP-1035 3FP" 1037 3FP-1044 The following fire hydrants and fire hydrant equipment houses we-e inspected.
3FP-38 3FP-49 3FP"54 3FP"60 3FP-62 3FP-65 3FP"69
.3FP"79 3FP-86 3FP-87 3FP-90 3FP"92 3FP-121 3FP"433 The equipment houses contained the minimum equipment requirements of that specified by NFPA-24, Private Fire Service
~
Mains and Their Appurtenances and/or the FSAR Requirements.
The equipment appeared to be adequately maintained.
A tour of the exterior of the plant indicated that sufficient clearance was provided between permanent safety related buildings and structures and temporary buildings trailers and other transient combustible materials.
The general housekeeping of the areas adjacent-to the permanent plant structures was satisfactory.
(2)
Permanent Plant Fire Protection Feature's A plant tour was made by the inspector.
During the plant tour, the safe shutdown related plant areas within the Reactor Auxiliary Building (RAB)
and their related fire protection features were inspected.
The fire/smoke detection systems manual fire fighting equipment (i.e.
portable extinguishers, hose stations, etc.)
and the fire area boundary walls, floors and ceiling associated for the above plant areas were inspected and verified to be in service or functional.
The automatic sprinkler systems installed in the 190 and 305 elevation of the RAB were inspected and found to be in service.
Based on this inspection, it appears that the fire protection features associated with the above plant areas are satisfactorily maintaine The plant tour also verified the licensee's implementation of the fire prevention administrative procedures.
The control of combustibles and flammable materials, liquids and gases, and the general housekeeping were found to be satisfactory in the areas inspected.
(3)
NUREG 0800 Fire Protection Features The inspector visually inspected the fire rated raceway fire barriers required for compliance with NUREG 0800, Section c.5.b in the following plant areas.
Reactor Auxiliary Building Elevation 236 Reactor Auxiliary Building Elevation 261 Reactor Auxiliary Building Elevation 286 Reactor Auxiliary Building Elevation 305 Based on the inspectors observations of the raceway fire barrier enclosures in the areas above, it appears that the one hour fire barrier integrity associated with the above fire barrier assemblies are being properly maintained in a satisfactory condition.
The inspector also visua1ly inspected the one hour fire rated barriers separating MC 1A35-SA and lA3S;SB.
Based on this inspection the inspector determined that the one hour fire resistive integrity 'associated with the equipment fire barrier was being properly maintained in a satisfactory condition.
The inspector made a walkdown of the NUREG 0800 related sprinkler protection in the following plant areas.
Fire Zone RAB Elevation 1-A-1-PA 1-A-1-PB 1-A-3-PB 1-A-EPA 1-A-EPB 1-A-CSR-A 1-A-CSR-B 190 190 236 261 261 286 286 Based on this walkdown, the inspector determined that the sprinkler protection provided for the areas identified above provided sufficient protection with respect to controlling an exposure fire.
The following eight-hour emergency 1 ighting uni ts were inspected:
I
Unit No
~
RAB-4 RAB-67 RAB-12 RAB"45 RAB-32 RAB"286 RAB-52 RAB-286 RAB"50 RAB-63 These units were in service and appeared to be properly aligned.
The. inspector followedup on a concern identified in a previous inspection regarding improperly aligned lighting and a concern that the procedure did not adequately address ensuring the lights remained properly aligned.
During that inspection the licensee stated the procedure would be revised to include verifying proper alignment.
During this inspection the inspector verified that the procedure had been revised to address verifying proper lighting alignment.
3.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed)
Violation (400/88-01)
Inadequate Procedure FPP-013 for Implementing-Mitigating Actions for Inoperable Fire Suppression Systems.
The inspector verified that FPP-013 had been revised
.to cover the requirements for implementing mitigating actions for inoperable fire suppression systems.
(Closed) Violation (400/88-02)"-Failure to perform Quarterly Surveillance of the Multicycle and Preaction Sprinkler Systems on the 190, 286, and 305 Elevations of the Reactor Auxiliary Building.
The inspector verified that proper corrective steps were taken on this violation.'hese included periodic test of fire protection features which are not completed by the scheduled due date are now placed on a status board in the fire protection office.
In addition, the test task sheet is marked to indicate the equipment inoperable report EIR number and Work Requests and Authorization Numbers The periodic test is then placed on the "Tests Exception" Listing of the Daily Batch Report.
Prior to canceling an EIR the Daily Batch Report will be checked to determine whether there are other survei llances past due.
4.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on March 31, 1989, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspector described-the areas inspected and discus~md in detail the inspection results.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.