IR 05000397/1985018
| ML17278A234 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 05/21/1985 |
| From: | Johnson P, Qualls P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17278A233 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-397-85-18, NUDOCS 8506240699 | |
| Download: ML17278A234 (6) | |
Text
U. S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION V
Report No.
Docket No.
50-397/85-18 50-397 License No.
NPF-21 Licensee:
Washington Public Power Supply System P. 0. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352 Facility Name:
Washington Nuclear Project No.
2 (WNP-2)
Inspection at:
WHP-2 Site, Benton County, Washington Inspection conducted:
Hay 6-10, 1985 Inspector: ~ P.
M.
alls, Reactor Inspector Approved By:
P.
H ohnson, Chief Reac r Projects Section
+at S~
Date Signed S/s(/gW Date Signed Summary:
Ins ection on Ha 6-10 1985 (Re ort No. 50-397/85-18)
Areas Ins ected:
Unannounced'inspection,by the recently assigned Project Inspector for access badging, site orj.entation, staff introduction and to follow-up outstanding items.
The inspection involved 39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No violations or deviations were identified.
8506240699 850531 PDR ADOCK 05000397
~ ~
lI r.
IS f
'l
'I I
i I I I
I
I I
'S l
S p
II I
I
)
'l
,I Ii I
'I III II l
lIP I
()
',t I
h I
~ I S
I'.
ll I
,'I I
Ji
DETAIIS 1.
Persons Contacted
"C.
AJ
- >D.
T.
R.
AJ JD
"B
'C D.
A.
A.
R.
M.
N.
Powers, Plant Manager Baker, Assistant Plant Manager Feldman, Plant (}uality Assurance Manager Rienhardt, Training Supervisor Koenig, Compliance Engineer Bell, Manager, Industrial Safety and Fire Protection Bouchey, Director, Support Services Fitch, Executive Secretary, EFSEC Van Hoff, Senior State Liaison Fggen, Senior Fire Protection Engineer Jones, Senior Fire Protection Engineer Jones, Senior Fire Protection Engineer Mertens, Compliance Engineer Martlett, (}uality Assurance Supervisor Irwin, equality Control Supervisor
"=Attended the Exit Meeting on May 10, 1985.
2.
licensee Action on Previous Findin s a
~
(50-397/85-05-01)
(Closed) Fire'Dam er Testin
.
The inspector was told by licensee personnel that fire dampers are tested by removing the fusible link and verifying that the dampers close.
The air flow is secured during this test since during a fire the ventilation system air flow to the fire area is turned off.
This method has been accepted by NRR as a satisfactory means to ensure that fire dampers will close in the event of a fire.
This item is closed.
b.
(50-397/85-05-03)
(Closed) Fire Bri ade Trainin
.
The licensee has completed training all fire brigade members.
This item is closed.
c ~
(50-397/85-05-04)
(0 en) Control of Combustibles.
Due to the plant outage in progress at the time of the inspection, it appeared that there was a significant amount of transient combustible material inside the reactor and diesel generator buildings.
Plant procedure PPM 1.3.10, Fire Protection Program, was being revised to make it easier to control the type,and amount of combustible materials inside of plant vital areas.
The inspector discussed with the Assistant Plant Manager the increased fire hazard during outages due to increased materials and work such as welding and grinding.
Methods were also discussed to ensure that the effectiveness of the licensee's fire protection program is not -impaired during the outage.
This item is open.
I>>
No violations or deviations were identified.
t
C u
~
I I Pl r
-2-3.
Plant Tour The inspector conducted an unescorted tour of the facility to orient himself with plant equipment location and configuration.
During the tour the inspector observed outage work in progress, control room decorum and station housekeeping and storage.
The inspector noted the potential for housekeeping problems as discussed in paragraph 2.c of this report.
No other problems were identified.
No violations or deviations were identified.
4.
Meetin s with Plant Staff The inspector met individually with several of the plant department managers to become acquainted with the manager; to meet key personnel in his department; to'iscuss his programs, job, and his department's interface with the Supply System organization; and to discuss the nature and location of pertinent records generated by the department.
No violations or deviations were identified.
5.
Exit Interview An exit meeting was held with members of the plant staff on May 10, 1985.
The items listed in this'eport were discussed at that tim ~ ~
r 1j A,
,l
'L
r i
,f f
I S