IR 05000395/1981018

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-395/81-18 on 810721-24.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Electrical & Instrumentation Cables,Termination Work & Review of Quality Records
ML20010F038
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/06/1981
From: Ruff A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20010F035 List:
References
50-395-81-18, NUDOCS 8109090295
Download: ML20010F038 (5)


Text

.

.

'

UNITED STATES 8'

f, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$

I REGION 11

%

/[

101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., St 'tTE 3100 o,

ATLANTA, GEORGIA J0303 Report No. 50-395/81-18 Licensee:

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Columbia, South Carolina 29218 Facility Name:

V. C. Summer Docket No. 50-395 License No. CPPR-94 Inspection at V. C. Summer site near Columbia, South c rolina inspector: __

[<

l YA

] -- h f /'

A. B. Ruff

'

Date Signed

'

Approved by. M_[

M

[ - 4,- 7/

T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Engir.eering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on July 21-24, 1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 30 inspector-hours onsita in the areas of electrical and instrumentation cables and termination work, work activities and review of quality records; instrumentation components and systems work, work activities and review of quality records; fire seal for electrical cables; licensee identified items, and followup inspection of unresolved items.

Results Of the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.

8109090295 910811 PDR ADOCK 05000395 Q

ppg

.

~

.

.

.

.

.

REPORT DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

  • 0. S. Bradham, Site Manager L

D. Moore, QA Manager

  • A. A. Smith, Director QA Surveillance System
  • T. A. McAlister, QA Surveillance Specialist
  • C. C. Turkett, QC Supervisor
  • S. S. Howze, Licensing D. Dawkins, QC Representative Other Organizations
  • M. A. Cerylak, Daniel Construction Co., Project QA Engineer
  • G. A. Dacier III, Daniel Construction Co., QA Engineer.

R. Brooks, Bisco, QC Representative

  • Attended exit interview 2.

Exit Interview The inspection scc 9 and findings were summarized on July 24, 1981 with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a.

(Closed) 395/76-08-03, " General Warning Alarm System (GWAS)." This item involved undetectable failure problems in the GWAS supplied by Westinghouse.

This equipment has been modified by Engineering Change Notice (ECN) 1014, Maintenance Work Request (MWR) 050045, and procedure ICP-FCN-CGE-10512-002, " Modification of General W&rring/ Reactor Trip Circuit."

4.

Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.

S.

Independent Inspecticn The inspector conducted a walk-through inspection of the auxiliary and containment buildings.

The current status in tne electrical areas of the construction was observed.

During this inspection seven electrical penetration assembites (EPA) were looked at and all were noted to be pressurized. The inspector requested to look at the

._

,

- - - -

- - - - -. - - -

-

-

- - - -

- - -

- - - - - - - - - - -

.

.

.

..

surveillance / maintenance records for these items and was informed that af ter installation and turn over to power production there were none. This item is identified as Inspector Followup Item (IFT)

395/81-18-01,

" Surveillance / Maintenance Procedure for EPA's After Installation."

Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.

6.

Licensee Identified Items (LII)

The inspector reviewed LII associated witn electrical or instrumentation equipment. The listing below identifies the item, and present status.

a.

(Closed) LII 395/81-04-01, " Valve Damaged Due tc Altered Torque Switch."

On October 23, 1980, SCE&G notified IE:II of a possible 50.55(e) item concerning damage to accumulator "A" isolation valve. A thirty day interim report was sent on October 24, 1980. SCE&G in their letter of July 23, 1981 states that followup engineering evaluation dispositioned this item as not reportable by 10 CFR 50.55(e) criteria.

The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation and agrees with the licensee's disposition.

b.

(Closed) LII 395/81-04-04, " Valve Actuator Not Fully Assembled." On January 14, 1981 SCE&G notified IE:II of a possible 50.55(e) item concerning the RC Drain Tank control valve actuator, which was not fully assembled. A thirty day interim report was sent to IE:II on February 13, 1981. SCE&G in their letter of July 24, 1981 state:: that followup engineering evaluation dispositioned this item as not reportable by 10 CFR 50.55(e) criteria. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation and agrees with the licensee's disposition.

c.

(Closed) Item 395/80-05-01 " Undetectable Failure in ESFAS" (10 CFR 50.55(e)). On November 7, 1979, SCE&G notified IE:II of a 50.55(e)

item concerning an undetectable failure in the Engineered Safety Features Actuation System.

The Construction Deficiency Report was submitted on December 3, 1979.

The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee representatives, reviewed supporting documentation to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed, d.

(Closed) Item 395/81-04-08 " Moisture in A Component Cooling Pump Motor."

On February 5, 1981, SCE&G notified IE:II of a possible 50.55(e) item concerning moisture in component cooling pump motor 1A.

SCE&G confirmed the matter to be reportable on May 22, 1981.

An interim report was submitted on March 10, 1981. The final Construction Deficiency Report was submitted on May 28, 1981. The report has been

..

.

,.

,

~

reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed.

e.

(Closed) Item 395/80-37-12 " Defective 480 Volt Switchgear Trip Units."

On November 26, 1980, SCE&G notified IE:II of'a possible 50.55(e) item concerning " Power Shield" trip units that tested good but would not hold in the service breaker when the motor was started.

SCE&G confirmed the matter to be reportable during the early part of May 1981.

Interim reports were submitted on December 23, 1980 and March 6, 1981.

The final Construction Deficiency Report was submitted on May 22, 1981.

The report has been reviewed and determined to be acceptable by IE:II. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee representatives and reviewed supporting documentation to verify that the corrective actions identified in the report have been completed, f.

(Closed) LII 395/80-37-11

" Seismic Installation Not Inspected." On November 26, 1980, SCE&G notified IE:II of a pnssible 50.55(e) item concerning non-safety related cabinets in the relay room. The cabinets were required to be seismically mounted since there are safety related cabinets in the same room.

Interim reports were submitted to IE:II on December 23, 1980 and January 30, 1981.

SCE&G in their letter of February 10, 1981 states that evaluation of the discrepancies by structui.1 engineering has dispositioned this item as not reportable by 10 CFR 50.55(e) criteria.

The inspector held discussions w'th responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation and agrees with the licensee's disposition.

The discrepancies have been corrected.

g.

(Closed)

395/81-07-01,

" Diode Failure in Rosemount Pressure Transmitter - Model 1152." On April 1,1981, SCE&G notified IE:II of a possible 50.55(e) item concerning potential diode failures in these transmitters. An interim report was submitted to IE:II on April 3, 1981. SCE&G in their letter to the Resident Inspector on June 10, 1981 states that IE:II was previously notified by phone that followup engineering evaluation dispositioned this item as not reportable by 10 CFR 50.55(e) criteria. The inspector held discussions with responsible licensee personnel, reviewed supporting documentation and agrees with the licensee's disposition.

7.

Fire Seals for Electrical Cable Trays and Conduit The inspector selected for examiniation the following fire seals for electrical cable trays and conduits. 'All portions were not complete in that some sealing still had to be done inside the condui.

_

_

_

__

....

a.:

.

.

FIRE SEAL NO.

_(bisco No)

LOCATION ELEV.

2041 Aux Bldg 426 ft.

1734 Aux Bldg 397 ft.

172 436 ft.

-

173 436 ft.

-

894 Control Bldg 436 ft.

881 Control Bldg 436 ft.

719 Control Bldg 436 ft.

996, 997, 1003 Control Bldg 448 ft.

1009-1012 The Bisco QC procedures QCS-101, " Qualification Test for Silicone Foam Material," and QCP-006, " Inspection Criteria" were used in this examination.

Within the area examined there were no violations identified.

8.

Instrumentation and Electrical (Cables and Terminations I & II) -

Observation of Work, Work Activities and Review of Quality Records The material certification for cables CCC-56B, CCW-228, AHC-778, AHC-116B, AHC-678, ESW-17A, ESL-162A, ESL-351A, RHC-6A, and RHC-102A were examined for conformance to specifications.

Field Change Requests B3024E, B5560E, and B3245E were examined to insure that work was accomplished as specified and to see that these requests were incorporated into final cable pull cards and/or drawings.

Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.

9.

Instrumentation (Components and Systems I & II) - Observation of Work, Work Activities and Review of Quality Records The inspector selected Loop 1 SG pressure transmitter (PT) 474 for an examination. This examination wa. to insure that the requirements of the FSAR and QAM were complied with in the area of installation, work and generation of records associated with this instrument.

The qualification records for six SCE&G QA and QC inspectors were reviewed to insure that records are complete and current.

Within the area examined there were no violations identified.

L