IR 05000389/1982027
| ML20062J493 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 07/21/1982 |
| From: | Crowley B, Economos N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062J480 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-389-82-27, IEB-80-08, IEB-80-8, NUDOCS 8208160383 | |
| Download: ML20062J493 (8) | |
Text
- RCOO UNITED STATES
.
'o,,
NUCLEAF2 REGULATORY COMMISSIOM
.[
REGION 11 c.
a$
101 M ARIETTA STREET, N.W.
"f ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30303
%g
/
,
.....
Report No. 50-389/82-27-Licensee:
Florida Power and Light 9250 West Flagler Street Miami, FL 33101 Facility Name:
St. Lucie Docket No. 50-389 License No. CPPR-144 Inspection at St. Lucie site near Fort Pierce, Florida 72kf(L f
Ad?
g Inspector:
B. ff. Crowley i
)
' Date Signed
,
"
Approved by:
-%mfo
/
- -
N. Ecodomos, Acting Section Chief
/ D We Signed
~
Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on June 22-25, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 25 inspector-hours on site in the areas of preservice inspection (PSI), internals welding, previous inspection finding and IE Bulletins.
Results No violations or deviations were identified.
82081603EG 820722
'
gDRADOCK 05000389 PDR
,
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- B. J. Escue, Site Manager
- G. E. Crowell, Site Engineering Supervisor
- G. Gotch, Section Supervisor Codes & Inspection - PNS'
- W. F. Jackson, Welding Superintendent
- R. A. Symes, Supervising QA Engineer
- P. P. Carrier, Power Plant Engineering - Licensing
- T. A. Geissinger, Area QC Supervisor E. L. Anderson, ISI Engineer - PNS S. A. Collard, Metallurgist - PNS
- E. W. Sherman, QA Engineer J. W. Adams, QA Engineer W. H. Black, QA Engineer Other licensee employees contacted included NDE examiners and QA personnel.
Other Organizations
- J. J. Capezza, Resident Engineer, Ebasco Services, Inc.
- G. E. Grace, Licensing Engineer, Ebasco Services, Inc.
G. H. Hand, Level IIA Examiner, Zetec Inc.
J. C. Whitney, Mechanical Engineer, Ebasco Services, Inc.
.e,,
G. R. Perkins, President, NDE Engineering Consultants, Inc.
--
- K. N. Flanagan, Assistant Site Manager, Ebasco Services, Inc.
- G. H. Krauss, ESSE Project Engineer, Ebasco Services, Inc.
J. C. Orlowski, Licensing, Combustion Engineering, Inc.
G. L. Folks, Level II NDE Examiner, U.S. Testing
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on June 25, 1982. with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings listed below.
(0 pen) Unresolved Item 389/82-27-01, Incorrect Weld Record For Weld FW001 on System Number CSB-0002 (Internals), paragraph 7.b.
(0 pen) Inspector Followup Item 389/82-27-02, RT Penetrameter Placement on Containment Penetration Welds, paragraph 1.
-.
=-
-
.
.
!
.
.
i i
T 3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Unresolved Itee 389/81-07-08, Welder Not Qualified to WPS Specified on Weld Traveler. This item was examined during the RII inspection docu-mented in report 50-389/82-19. During that inspection the inspector noted-that the responsibilities for verification of welder qualification were net clearly defined. The-licensee has issued revision 7 to procedure SQP-8 to clearly specify that the welding supervisor is responsible for verifying
,
welder qualification. This item is considered resolved.
(0 pen) Violation 389/82-13-05, Use of Incorrect Calibration Block For PSI UT of Weld RC-123-2.
Florida Power and Light Company's (FP&L) letter of response (L-82-232) dated May 28, 1982 has been reviewed and determined to i
be acceptable by Region II. However, when attempting to verify corrective
-
action on site, the inspector determined that the commitment to be in full
'
'
compliance by June 15, 1982, was not achieved.
The letter of response stated that weld RC-123-2 would be re-inspected and the records for all
.
primary coolant piping would be re revie.wed for such problems. At the time l
'
of the inspection weld RC-123-2 had not been re-inspectert.
The weld was i
re-inspected during the inspection and no recordable indications were found.
The other primary coolant weld records had been re-reviewed.
Problems
.
I similar to the one identified in the violation had been identified.
How-ever, all of these problems had not been corrected. The licensee agreed
'
to submit another response stating the reasons for not meeting the full compliance date and establishing a new date for full compliance. This item
remains open.
<
,
i 4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to
,
determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-l tions. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed
in paragraph 7.b.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort
'
The inspector conducted a general inspection of the reactor building to
observe construction activities such as welding, material control, house-
keeping and storage.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
i
6.
Inspector Follow 9n Items a.
(Closed) Ir:spector Followup Item 389/82-19-02, Disposition. of UT i
Indications In Welds RC-112-1, RC-123-1 and RC-121-6. This item was
!
reviewed during the RII inspection covered by report 50-389/82-20. The
only concern af ter that inspection was the need to re-inspect the i
indications in weld RC-112-1 from the inside surface using a 70 angle beam tranducer. The 70 angle beam inspection from the inside surface
and additional 45 angle beam inspections from the outside surface have i
i
!
'
,
,
_ _. _. _,
__
_
_ _ _
_.
._
-
.
.
,
l L
,
!
'
t r
i been performed and documented by the licensee.
These -inspections verify the size and location of the indications to be compatable with that previously indicated using beam plot corrections. Although the inspector has no further questions on the indications covered by this Inspector Followup Item, the methods used to size their indications are
-
not necessarily applicable to future indications. Each case ~must stand
"
on its own merit.
.
b.
(0 pen) 10spector Followup Item 389/82-19-01, Issue of FP&L PSI Program l
and Plan Descriptions. The inspector evaluated the status of this ~
l item. The program and plan descriptions still have not been issued as
- .
FP&L documents. The licensee is considering the final format for the documents. Since it appears the final issue of these documents may not t
,
be until near the end of the PSI, the licensee agreed to evaluate the
'
need for a " tie together" document to cover the entire PSI program and
,
'
its " workings".
7.
Reactor Vessel Internals (Welding) - Observation of Welding and Associated Activities J
-
r j
At the time of this inspection, all welding associated with reactor vessel
internals had been completed. Therefore, in lieu of observation of welding, i
the inspector reviewed the welding records described below to -determine r
whether reactor vessel internals welding was accomplished in accordance with i
applicable.mquiatory and code requirements. The applicable code for this
!
welding is the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, 1977
Edition including Addenda through summer 1977.
)
The inspector reviewed welding and associated records for the following a.
internals welds:
,
'
!
System Weld
'
(
!
RFB-00001 FW 001
!
FW 001A
-
FW 005
<
FW 005A
CSB-0002 FW 001 '
r
'
!
!
The records consisting of " Weld Traveler", including inspection
"
reports; a sample -f " Weld Material Requisition Reports", a sample of
,
" Receipt Inspection Reports", and " Welder Qualification Record" were
[
reviewed in the areas of:
,
!
t
(1) Weld identification
'
!
(2) Weld fitup and alignment
!
(3) Welding material control (4) Use of correct welding material (5) Use of qualified welders
,
!
(6) Use of correct welding procedure
,
!
i
_ -,._ -. _
_ _
_ _
.....
.
__
_.
-
.. ~ -
c
-
.
(7)
Inspection of weld including required hold points (8) Preheat and interpass temperature control (9) Use of correct NDE b.
During review of the above records the inspector noted the following problems for weld FW 001 on system CSB-0002:
(1) The weld traveler did not have any welder stamp (identification)
recorded. In accordance with the licensee progam, in addition to identification of welders on the weld traveler, the welders of each weld are identified in the computer by inputting welder identification information from each " Weld Material Requisition Report". A review of a computer printout of this information for weld FW 001 revealed that four welders withdrew welding material for the weld. Therefore, the identification of the welder (s) is not lost when not entered on the weld traveler.
(2) During review of the computer printout of " Weld Material Requisi-tion Report" information above, the inspector noted that one of the weld material control numbers was for E 7018 electrodes. A review of the actual " Weld Material Requisition Record" revealed that although the correct material description (ER 308) for the weld was recorded, the control number was for E 7018 electrodes.
It appears that someone wrote down the wrong control number since all of the other information (remaining weld material descrip-tions, control numbers, WPS's etc.) for the welds were correct.
During the inspection, it could not be determined whether the above records problems were isolated conditions.
However, the licensee stated that a 100% review of all weld travelers has just started and is expected to take several months to complete. The review would identify problems such as noted by the inspector.
Therefore, until the full extent of this problem is determined, this matter is considered unre-sol ed and is identified as item number 389/82-27-01, Incorrect Weld v
Record For Weld FW 001 On System Number CSB-0002 (Internals).
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Preservice Inspection (PSI) - Review of Procedures The inspector reviewed the PSI procedures described below to determine whether the procedures were consistent with regulatory requirements.
The PSI is being performed in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, 1977 Edition with Addenda through S78 as modified by 10 CFR 50.55a.(g).
'
a.
The inspector reviewed the licensee's PSI Inspection Plan and the governing examination procedures for four ASME Section XI areas to determine whether proper requirements for examination categories,
,
methods and extent of examination were specified in accordance with i
I
_
_
-
.- -
a w
r
~.
..e
.
-
.
.a
.
.
t
,
ASME Section XI. The examination areas and applicable procedures were as follows:
<
a
,
'
Examination Area Procedures Category C-A, Icems C1-10, NDE 5.1 i
Cl-20, C1-30
-
!
Category C-F, Item C5.21 NDE 5.4 NDE 3.1 NDE 5.1
.
Category B-J, Item B9.11 NDE 5.4 NDE 5.1 NDE 5.11 i
'
Category B-Q NDE 6.1 i
b.
Eddy current (ET) procedure NDE 6.1, revision 0, " Eddy Current Examina-
'
tion of Nonferrous Tubing By Multifrequency Techniques" was reviewed for technical content in the areas of:
. T (1) Equipment
]
(2) Test Method i
(3) Frequencies (4) Calibration i
(5) Reporting I
,
(6) Acceptance criteria Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations wera identified.
- 9.
Preservice Inspection - Observation of Work and Work Activities
- i i
The inspector observed the PSI activities described below to determine
-
!
i whether these activities were being performed in accordance with regulatory requirements and licensee procedures. See paragraph 8 above for the applic-
,!
able code.
-
'
t
!
a.
Personnel qualification records were reviewed for 2 level II-MT, 1
l level I-ET, and 1 level IIA-ET examiners.
[
b.
The inspector observed in process eddy current (ET) inspection,
'
!
including calibration and demonstration of ET signals from all cali-i l
bration reflectors, of the following steam generator tubes:
r
"B" Generator - R43L45, R45L45, R47L45, R49L45, and R51L45 i
i
"A" Generator - R81L45, R83L45, R85L45, R87L45, R89L45, R91L45, and i
R93L45 i
i i
'
i I
-,
--
m y,
,,y.
r
.m--
,-,-,y
,
y
-
w
--~- -
-
n
---n-
-
+
~
.
The inspections were compared with applicable procedures in the following areas:
(1) Availability of and compliance with approved NDE procedures (2) Use of knowledgeable NDE personnel (3) Use of NDE personnel qualified to the proper level (4)
Records of inspection results (5) Use of proper equipment (6)
Frequencies (7) Calibration (8) Tube coverage (9) Acceptance criteria c.
All PSI magnetic particle (MT) inspections had been completed prior to this inspection. The inspector reviewed MT records for welds MS-28-FW-4A and 28-1-SW-5 in zone 63. The records were compared with applic-able procedures in the areas of:
(1) Compliance with approved NDE procedures (2) Use of NDE personnel qualified to the proper level (3) Recording of inspection results (4) Examination method (5) Contrast of dry powder particle color with background and surface temperature (6) Examination overlap and directions (7) Pole spacing (8) Yoke lif ting power (9) Acceptance criteria Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
10.
IE Bulletins (IEB's)
(Closed) 80-80-08, Examination of Containment Liner Penetration Welds. On September 23, 1980, Florida Power and Light Company (FP&L) submitted a fiaa?
response (L-80-323) to IEB 80-08.
During a signt inspectior (see repnrt 50-389/80-15) the RII inspector raised several questions regarding interpre-tation of information included in the response.
Subsequently, on December 1, 1980, FP&L submitted additional infermation (L-80-394).
In summary, the additional information provided a listing of all penetrations, sketches showing the welds in question, and summarized the NDE required.
In addition, the information indicated that no backing bars were used and radiographic (RT) inspection was required for all welds addressed by the Bulletin.
i In order to verify that the requirements of the Bulletin had been met, the inspector randomly picked the penetrations listed below for review:
!
l i
,
,
.
.
Penetration System Size Type Field Vendor Field Number Weld Dwg.
Dwg.
Feedwater 45" X2.25" I
FW-3 2298-1995 FSG-2298-1996, 1997 M-148 1998 Shts 1-4
Charging 2" Sch. 160 III FW-3 2998-2007
"
Cont.
6" Sch. 160 III FW-3 2998-2013
"
Spray
Safety 3" Sch. 160 III FW-3 2928-2929
"
Injection In order to verify that the vendor welds and field welds addressed by the
Bulletin were non-backing bar type welds and were RT inspected the inspector reviewed the following for the above penetrations:
a.
Field Weld " Weld Travelers" b.
RT film for field welds - reviewed for the presence of backing bar and general weld quality c.
Field drawings d.
Vendor drawings e.
Field WPSs f.
" Tube Turn Weld Control Record" for vendor welds During review of the RT film of Weld FW 3 on penetration 36, the inspector noted that the penetrameters had been placed on the weld or in the area of interest for view 23-35.
The ASME Cods,Section V, and the licensee's procedure allow placing the penetrameter on the weld where required by geometry or other conditions to obtain density relationship between pene-trameter and the area of interest. For the weld in question, placement of the penetrameter in the area of interest did not appear to be required to obtain proper density. This problem was found near the end of the inspec-tion and it cnuld not be readily determined whether placement of the pene-trameter on the weld was justified. Therefore, this matter was identified for followup during a future inspection as inspector followup item 389/82-27-02, RT Penetrameter Placement on Containment Pentration Welds.
Based on review of the licensee's response and review of the above records, IEB 80-08 is closed.
Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.