IR 05000389/1982023
| ML20062J402 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 06/18/1982 |
| From: | Conlon T, Miller W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20062J343 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-389-82-23, NUDOCS 8208160357 | |
| Download: ML20062J402 (3) | |
Text
- \\
e"'%
UNITED STATES p
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y
y'
g REGION 11 g,
- j 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 0,
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303
.....
Report No. 50-389/82-23 Licensee:
Florida Power and Light Company P. O. Box 529100 Miami, FL 33152 Facility Name:
St. Lucie Docket No. 50-389 License No. CPPR-144 Inspection at St. Lucie site near Fort Pierce, Florida eb b '/ E -N Inspector:_
"
W. H. Miller, Jr.
U Date Signed
_ pg Jyp G
/ f-8 Z-Approved by: P g>
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on May 25-28, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 23 inspector-hours on site in the areas of fire protection / prevention.
Results Of the areas inspected, no violations were identified, however one deviation was idertified (Failure to fully implement QA requirements of QP2.12, Paragraph 5).
82081603S7 820802 PDR ADOCK 05000329 C
...
y
..
.
REPORT DETAILS-1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- B. J. Escue, Site Manager
- G. Crowell, Site Engineering Supervisor
- P. Carrier, EPP Licensing S. Parker, QC Supervisor C. Carnett, QC, Electrical S. Reuwer, Piping Engineer Other Organizations
- R. A. Garramore, Sr. Resident Engineer /EBASCO
- G. H. Krauss, ESSE /EBASCO G. Maxwell, Materials Supervisor /EBASCO J. Capezza, Electrical Resident Engineer /EBASCO W. E. Stitt, Construction Electrical Supervisor /EBASCO NRC Resident Inspectors S. Elrod
- H. Bibb
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and fi-ndings were summarized on May 28, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph I above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information.is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-tions. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 5.
.
..
-
--
.-
-
-.
. _ -
.
,
_
.
-
- _. - -
- -!
_
w.
r
....
!
'
,
T 5.
Fire Protection Quality Assurance Program
,
The inspector reviewed the QA/QC program being applied to the installation
!
of' the permanent fire protection systems. -In general, the fire protection i
systems are considered by the licensee to be balance of plant systems and
!
l thus do not receive any more additional special attention than other balance
'
of plant systems. FPL's NRC approved Topical Report Appendix E refers to FPL's QA Manual Procedure QP2.12 as the document identifying the QA program to be applied to the fire protection systems.
However, local site proce-dures had not been prepared to implement Procedure QA2.12.
.
The fire detection system for the diesel generator building and fire hose
-
system for the auxiliary building were evaluated to determine what QA/QC controls were actually being provided.
It was found that cable pull cards
,
were prepared by the construction group for the cables to the detection
-
devices but the cable pulls were not verified by a QC inspector. Construc-tion tests of the wiring were accomplished by a construction test engineer
!
but QC verification was not provided.
The licensee stated that the com-
}
pleted systems are to be functionally' tested by the startup and test group
>
L prior to acceptance. The piping installation for the fire hose system had
not been verified by QC; however, all pipe welds and all hangers were to be
inspected by QC. The hydrostatic and flushing tests are to be witnessed by the construction test group.
None of the rire protection components
!'
!
received a QA/QC receipt inspection, but these components were inspected by warehouse personnel to verify conformance to the purchase documents.
!
j The licensee's failure to implement a site QA fire protection program which
-
conformed to Procedure QP2.12 as referenced in the approved QA Topical
!
Report is identified as Deviation Item (389/82-23-01), Failure to fully -
!
implement the QA requirements of QP2.12, t
i In reviewing the interior fire hose system the inspector noted that this system is designed and is being installed to meet provisions of ANSI B31.1, Power Piping in lieu of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard
'
Standpipe and Hose Systems, as committed by FSAR Appendix 9.5.A.
.
Section 7, Item E.3(d). The control and sectional valves for the system do
not appear to be approved for fire service as required by NFPA 14, Section
.
625. Also, the connection to the underground supply pipe did not appear to I
i be properly restrained as required by NFPA 14, Section 631 and NFPA 24,
!
Outside Protection, Section 96 and Figure 96-39. The licensee was requested
!
,
during the exit interview to review the design and installation of the fire i
.
hose system to verify that the system will conform to'NFPA 14. This item is
!.
identified as Unresolved Item (389/82-23-02), Evaluation of interior fire
'
hose system by licensee to verify that system conforms to requirements of j
NFPA 14, and will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC inspection.
Within the areas examined, no violations were identified and no additional I
deviations, except as noted above were identified.
>
i i
!
r
i t
-- -. -,. - + +
,+-,n-+
-..-..--~.--.n
,
-,
-,,.n
,
-,n-,,~-
,,-.m
,---,---,----,,,.,--,--n.~-
-,w,
--, --
.-