IR 05000389/1982023

IE Insp Rept 50-389/82-23 on 820525-28.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Implement QA Requirements Fully

ML20062J402
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	06/18/1982
From:	Conlon T, Miller W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20062J343	List: IR 05000389/1982023 L-82-301, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-389/82-23.Corrective Actions:Draft Site Quality Procedure Prepared Re Fire Protection Sys,Outlining QA Controls ML20062J338 ML20062J348 ML20062J381
References
50-389-82-23, NUDOCS 8208160357
Download: ML20062J402 (3)

Text

• \ 0

• *

p e"'% UNITED STATES y 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y' g REGION 11 g, ;j 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 0, 4 ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303

.....

Report No. 50-389/82-23 Licensee: Florida Power and Light Company P. O. Box 529100 Miami, FL 33152 Facility Name: St. Lucie Docket No. 50-389 License No. CPPR-144 Inspection at St. Lucie site near Fort Pierce, Florida Inspector:_

W. H. Miller, J "

eb U b '/ E -N Date Signed Approved by: P _ g>

pg Jyp G / f- 8 Z-T. E. Conlon, Section Chief Date Signed Engineering Inspection Branch Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY Inspection on May 25-28, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 23 inspector-hours on site in the areas of fire protection / preventio Results Of the areas inspected, no violations were identified, however one deviation was idertified (Failure to fully implement QA requirements of QP2.12, Paragraph 5).

82081603S7 820802 PDR ADOCK 05000329 C PDR

. . . y

.. .

REPORT DETAILS

- Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• B. J. Escue, Site Manager

• G. Crowell, Site Engineering Supervisor

• N. T. Weems, Superintendent, QA D. R. Cooper, Supervising QA Engineer

• E. W. Sherman, QA Engineer J. W. Adams, QA Engineer

• P. Carrier, EPP Licensing S. Parker, QC Supervisor C. Carnett, QC, Electrical S. Reuwer, Piping Engineer Other Organizations

• R. A. Garramore, Sr. Resident Engineer /EBASCO

• G. H. Krauss, ESSE /EBASCO G. Maxwell, Materials Supervisor /EBASCO J. Capezza, Electrical Resident Engineer /EBASCO W. E. Stitt, Construction Electrical Supervisor /EBASCO NRC Resident Inspectors S. Elrod

• H. Bibb

• Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and fi-ndings were summarized on May 28, 1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph I abov . Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspecte . Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information .is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or devia-tions. New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 5.

.

. . - -- .- - -. . _ - .

_ , _ . - - _ . - -

- -! r

....

!

'

,

4 T Fire Protection Quality Assurance Program

,

The inspector reviewed the QA/QC program being applied to the installation  !

of' the permanent fire protection systems. -In general, the fire protection i

systems are considered by the licensee to be balance of plant systems and  !

l

'

thus do not receive any more additional special attention than other balance of plant systems. FPL's NRC approved Topical Report Appendix E refers to FPL's QA Manual Procedure QP2.12 as the document identifying the QA program to be applied to the fire protection system However, local site proce-dures had not been prepared to implement Procedure QA2.1 .

-

The fire detection system for the diesel generator building and fire hose system for the auxiliary building were evaluated to determine what QA/QC controls were actually being provided. It was found that cable pull cards

-

,

were prepared by the construction group for the cables to the detection

devices but the cable pulls were not verified by a QC inspector. Construc-tion tests of the wiring were accomplished by a construction test engineer  !

but QC verification was not provide The licensee stated that the com-

} pleted systems are to be functionally' tested by the startup and test group >

L prior to acceptance. The piping installation for the fire hose system had 1 not been verified by QC; however, all pipe welds and all hangers were to be  ;

inspected by QC. The hydrostatic and flushing tests are to be witnessed by the construction test grou None of the rire protection components  !'

! received a QA/QC receipt inspection, but these components were inspected by warehouse personnel to verify conformance to the purchase document !

j The licensee's failure to implement a site QA fire protection program which

-

conformed to Procedure QP2.12 as referenced in the approved QA Topical

! Report is identified as Deviation Item (389/82-23-01), Failure to fully -

! implement the QA requirements of QP2.12, t

i In reviewing the interior fire hose system the inspector noted that this system is designed and is being installed to meet provisions of ANSI B31.1,

'

Power Piping in lieu of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 14 Standpipe and Hose Systems, as committed by FSAR Appendix 9. .

Section 7, Item E.3(d). The control and sectional valves for the system do  ;

not appear to be approved for fire service as required by NFPA 14, Section

.

625. Also, the connection to the underground supply pipe did not appear to I i be properly restrained as required by NFPA 14, Section 631 and NFPA 24,  !

,

Outside Protection, Section 96 and Figure 96-39. The licensee was requested  !

during the exit interview to review the design and installation of the fire i

.

hose system to verify that the system will conform to'NFPA 14. This item is  ;

!. identified as Unresolved Item (389/82-23-02), Evaluation of interior fire

'

hose system by licensee to verify that system conforms to requirements of j

NFPA 14, and will be reviewed during a subsequent NRC inspectio ;

Within the areas examined, no violations were identified and no additional I

deviations, except as noted above were identifie >

i i

!

r

i t

-- - . - , . - + + ,+-,n-+ -..-..--~.--.n , -, -,,.n , -,n-,,~- ,,-.m ,---,---,----,,,.,--,--n.~- .-

-,w, -- , --