IR 05000387/1979005
| ML17138A625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 04/05/1979 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17138A624 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-378-79-05, 50-378-79-5, 50-388-79-04, 50-388-79-4, NUDOCS 7906140628 | |
| Download: ML17138A625 (12) | |
Text
50-387/79-05 Report No. 50-388 79-04 50-387 Docket No. 50-388 bbby-License No.
CPPR-102 U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Prior ity Category
- Licensee:
Pennsylvania Power 8 Liqht Com any 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Facility Name:
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units
and
Inspection at:
Berwick, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
February 5 - March 2, 1979 Inspectors:
/PP'g
M. Gallo, i
t Reactor Inspector 3's date signed date signed Approved by:
/v'2tw R:
W. McGaughy, RC&ES Branch f, Projects Section, date signed da e
igne Ins ection Summar
Unit 1 Ins ection on Februar 5 - March '2 1979 Re ort No. 50-387 79-05
~AI d:
d
'
b d
by b
dd d
'b y:
snstallation and welding of reactor coolant pressure boundary and other piping; installation of safety-related pipe support and restraint systems; and installation of safety-related components.
The inspector also per-formed plant tours and reviewed licensee action on previous identified items.
The inspection involved 29 inspector-hours, including 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> during off shifts, by the NRC resident inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
Unit 2 Ins ection on Februar 5 - March 2, 1979 Re ort No. 50-388/79-04 eas Ins ected:
Routine 1nspection by the res>dent inspector of:
allation of safety-related pipe support and restraint systems; installation of electrical penetrations:
The inspector also per-formed plant tours and reviewed licensee action on previously identified items.
The inspection involved 12 inspector-hours by the NRC resident inspector.
Resul'ts':"-'o.'.,items of noncompliance were identified.
>906> eog~g
P a
)>>, ) '->)fp'-"
L
DETAILS Persons Contacted Note Penns lvania Power 8 Li ht Com an Capotosto, Si te QAE P.
L. Ballard, Site QAE R. Beckley, Site QAE G.=- Burvis, Site QAE
E.
S.
R.
J.
W.
T.
R.
A.
M.
Carroll, Site QAE L. Denson, Assistant Project Construction Manager H; Featenby, Project Construction Manager Green, Resident NQAE H. Gulliver, Senior Project Engineer NQA F. Oldenhage, Resident Engineer Prego, Site QAE R. Sabol, Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance D. Waldrop, Senior, Accountant - Auditing Division 2'3
1,
3
3 Bechtel Cor oration M.
M.
M.
G.
G.
J.
A.
R.
H.
J.
B.
G.
A.
K.
C.
K. Boone, Lead Welding Engineer L. Daubenheyer, Project Superintendent Services A. Drucker, Electrical QAE Gallandorm, Lead Pipe/Mechanical Engineer Gelinas, QC Lead Engineer Piping Mechanical Khandar, Mechanical QAE Konjura, Mechanical OAE Lamb, Assistant Lead Welding QCE Lilligh, Project QAE O'ullivan, Assistant Project Field Engineer Ott, Lead Welding QCE Schrader, Project Field Engineer Spielhagen, Project Field Engineer Stout, Assistant Project Field QCE Turnbow, Field Construction Manager 2'
1,
3
3
2
General Electric Com an Nuclear Ener Division NED Note E. A. Gustafson, Site Manager T.
M. LeVasseur, gC Representative C. Roof, Mechanical Engineer Peabod Testin Com an M. Nhalen, NDE Supervisor Notes 1 - denotes those present at exit interview, February 9, 1979 2 - denotes those present at exit interview, February 16, 1979 3 - denotes those present at exit interview, March 2, 1979 The inspector also interviewed other PPSL employees as well as employees of Bechtel, Peabody Testing Company, and General Elec-tric Company.
Plant Tour - Units 1 and
The inspector observed work activities in progress, completed work arid. plant status in several areas of the plant during general inspec-tion of.the';plant.
The inspector examined work for any obvious defects or noncompliancewith regulatory requirements or'icense conditions.
Particular note was taken of presence of quality con-trol inspectors and quality control evidence such as inspection records, material identification, nonconforming material identi-fication, housekeeping and equipment preservation.
The inspector interviewed craft personnel, supervision and guality Control per-sonnel as such personnel were available in the work areas.
No items of.'noncompliance wereidentified.
Licensee Action on Previous Ins ection Findin s (Closed)
Unresolved Item (387/78-17-02):
Documentation for
,
Structural Steel.
The inspector had previously noted that structural steel brack'et '. (Mark No. A1071) did not have a material certification or statement of conformance available onsite.
During this inspection, the inspector reviewed documentation provided by the subcontractor, Cives Steel Company, relative to the steel bracket,
a/
j
Documentation reviewed included:
Cives Miscellaneous Detail Material Drawing 1071 Statement of Conformance dated October 30, 1978 with loading list 4703a.
Material Cutting Sheet identifying Heat No.
B5102 for Piece A1071 Material Test Report for Heat No.
B5102 The inspector had no further questions on this matter.
4.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundar.
arid Safet Related Pi in Weldin The following listed activities were examined and verified that they were being performed in accordance with the ASME Section III and IX Codes, PSAR Appendix D, the Bechtel guality Assurance Manual Section III,,Site Specification M 204, M 207, drawings M-198 and M-199,-NCR 3391, GE Specification 22A4638, and Peabody Testing Procedure IPPT-300-39-03.
tl~idi
.
U it i Welding of:
VNB-B21-1-FW D2 GBB-118-2-FW5 The inspector verified selected detailed drawings, welding procedure, base and filler material as speci, fied, wel.der qualification, quality control documentation, weld appear-ance, welding variables such as gas flow and amperage, and nondestructive testing activities as appropriate.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
b.
Nondestructive Testin
- Unit
Liquid Penetrant Testing of:
DCA-108-1-FW4 (Weld Repair)
RD-1-B2 (ARC Strike Repair}
The inspector verified, as appropriate, surface preparation, qualification of examiners, and testing technique.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
c.
Weldin Material Control The inspector examined the control of weld filler metal at site rod rooms.
Documentation and site practices regarding weld filler metal were reviewed to verify that purchasing, receiving, identification, storage, testing, issue and moisture control including rebaking, where required, were accomplished in accordance with the Bechtel guality Assur-ance Manual Section III, Appendix 2, WFMC-1.
The inspector reviewed documentation relative to four heats of filler metal.
Those heats were:
Heat No.
411E8481 759174 90495C 34956C
~Te E7018 ER308L E308L-16 E309-16 No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundar Pi in
- Work In Pro ress-Unst I The inspector examined work activities for the Residual Heat Removal System suction line from the Recirculation System.
The inspector verified that the activities examined were being con-ducted in accordance with ASME Code Section III, the PSAR Appendix D, the Bechtel guality Assurance Manual Section III, FSAR Section 5.4.7, Bechtel Specification M-204, and Drawings M-199, M-151, and DCA-108-1.
The inspector observed handling, installation, protection, initial alignment work, and identification.
The inspector reviewed selected gC installation records including material certifications.
No items of noncompliance were identifie L ('
6.
Containment Penetrations
- Unit 2 The inspector observed the installation of containment electrical penetration ZW107 and reviewed pertinent documents to verify that they were technically adequate, current and approved.
The inspector verified that".the'installation
.activities were being conducted in accordance with commitments in the PSAR Appendix D; FSAR Sections 3.1.2.5 and 3.8.1; Bechtel Specification E-135; Westing-house Installation Instruction PEN-TR-76-19, revised July 7, 1978; gCI 6.6, Revision 5; FCI-E-122; Drawing E-60; and, FCR E-1080.
The inspector examined the following relative to the; above:
Method of assembly consistent v'>ith design requirements Measures to protect installed components Installation including handling and bolting gC inspection activities Installed penetration identification No items of noncompliance were-'.identified.
7.
Safet Related Pi e
Su ort and Restraint S stems The inspector witnessed the installation and torque testing of concrete expansion anchor bolts.
The inspector verified that'the type, diameter, embedment length and gC inspection met gA Program commitments.descri'bed in the PSAR, Appendix D and site specifications and procedures.
Specifications and procedures rei'erenced during this; inspection included:
gCI C-l.50 "Installation and Testing of Expansion Anchors" Specification C-72 "Installation of Expansion - Type Anchor Studs and Shells"
Supports examined during this inspection included:
HRC-14-Hl HRC-13-H3 HRC-13-H4 No items of noncompliance were identified.
8.
Installation of Safet Related Com onents The inspector witnessed the installation and torquing of Core Spray Pump 1P-206B internals.
The inspector verified that place-ment mounting, bolt torquing and gC inspection met gA program commitments as described in the PSAR Appendix D and site speci-fications and procedures.
Specifications and procedures referenced to during this inspection included:
Bechtel Drawing M-240 Vendor Manual Ml-E21-23-3 gCI M-2.10 "Installation of Rotating Equipment" gCIR 51.0-M1-1P-206-5 FP-M-1 The inspector verified that the torque values applied by craft personnel were in accordance with the Vendor Manual referenced above.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
9.
Exit Interview At.periodic intervals during the course of this inspection, meetings were held with facility management (dates arid attendees are denoted in Detail 1) to discuss inspection scope and findings.