IR 05000387/1979022
| ML17138A853 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1979 |
| From: | Caphton D, Guzman J, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17138A854 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-79-22, NUDOCS 7910160348 | |
| Download: ML17138A853 (11) | |
Text
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report No. 50-387/79-22 Docket No. 50-387 License No.
CPPR-101 Licensee:
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company 2 North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Facility Name:
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:
Berwick, Pennsylvania Inspection cond ted:
June 12-4, 1979 Category:
B Inspectors:
C'.
. Nic las-;...Reacto Inspector J.
A. Guzman Reactor Zns ector CO-OP D. L.
Ca hton Chief Nuclear Support Section No.
ate s gned date signed date signed Approved by:
('.. ap on, 1e, Nuc ear Support Section No. 1, RO&NS Branch te s1gne Ins ection Summar Ins ection on June 12-14 1979 Re ort No. 50-387 79-22 Areas Ins ected:
Routine unannounced inspection by a regional based
)nspector o t e preoperational test program including, test program review requirements, procedures and test sequencing, preoperational test witnessing, quality assurance and quality control implementation, and inspections of the facility.
The inspection involved 22.0 inspector-hours on site by one NRC regional based inspector, and 13.0 supervisory-hours by one NRC supervisor.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified.
79y0 y605 0'~
- 2-DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Penns 1 vania Power and Li ht Com an Mr. L.
- Mr. J.
Mr. P.
- Nr. T.
Mr. R.
- Mr. J.
Mr. G.
- Nr. T.
- Nr. H.
Nr. T.
Ballard, NgA Senior Analyst Bradford, guality Supervisor Capotosto, NgA Project Engineer Clymer, NgA Senior Anal'yst Dunn, Superintendent of Plant Green, N(A Resident Engineer Kuczynski, Starting
& Testing Field Engineer Oldenhage, Resident Engineer Stokes, Senior Project Engineer, Construction Yezerski, Starting
& Testing Coordinator Bechtel Power Cor oration Nr. G. Smith, ISG Supervisor Nr. J. Sullivan, Assistant Project Field Engineer The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel during the course of the inspection.
- denotes those present at the exit interview.
2.
Prep erational Test Pro ram a.
Test Pro ram Re uirements (1)
Discussion:
The inspector met with the integrated startup group (ISG) supervisor and discussed requirements of the below listed areas reviewed by the inspector as follows:
Preoperational Test Program, Test Organization, Test Program Administration, Document Control,'esign Changes and Modifications, Plant Maintenance/Preventive Maintenance,
-3-Equipment Protection and Cleanliness, Test and Measurement Equipment, and, Training.
(2)
References:
The following references were used in review of the preoperational test program requirements:
Startup Administrative Manual; Final Safety Analysis Report, chapter 13, Conduct of Operations and chapter 14, Initial Test Programs; Startup Technical Manual; Regulatory Guide 1.68, Initial Test Programs for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants; Plant Administrative Procedures Manual; and, guality Assurance Manual.
(3)
Findings:
By reviews and discussions, the inspector verified the following:
The applicant has prepared a description of the preoperational test program.
General areas of testing have been identified and assignment of responsibilities have been made; The applicants test program has requirements for testing that appear to be consistent with FSAR commitments; Administrative documentation specifies satisfactory format and content for preoperational test procedures; Required qualifications, responsibilities, lines of authority and method of appointments, and inter-faces existing between organizations in the test program, are clearly established in writing; Formal administrative measures have been established for jurisdictional control of system, component, or instrumentation status before, during, and sub-sequent to testing;
Formal administrative measures have been established governing the conduct of testing, controlled scheduling of test activities, and a formal program for evaluation of test results; For test procedures, engineering drawings and vendors manuals, formal administrative measures have been established for the review, approval, issuance, revision, control, modification, and changes of these documents; For design change control, temporary modifications, jumpers and bypasses, a formal method has been established for initiating, reviewing and approving requests for design changes and modifications, and written administrative controls have been established for controlling temporary modifications, jumpers and bypasses, including controls requiring formal logs to be maintained; Administrative procedures exist including controls and methods for initiating, approving, reviewing, and scheduling of plant and preventive maintenance, controls for equipment protection, and the establish-ment of administrative controls for preparation and retention of maintenance records; A formal program for housekeeping activities during preoperational testing has been established; Administrative procedures and controls have been established for the storage, protection, calibration, and recordkeeping of test and measurement equipment; andy Training requirements have been established in writing for all personnel involved in areas such as, test procedure preparation and approval test per-formance and documentation, and test results review and approval.
Training requirements also include administrative controls for testing, gA/gC for testing, and technical objectives.
The inspector had no further questions at this tim b.
Procedures and Test Se uencin (I)
Discussion:
The inspector met with the starting and testing coordinator and his group and discussed the following:
procedure types, preoperational test procedures acceptance test procedures startup procedures technical procedures procedure status and availability, draft copies approved copies tests and test sequencing, and, test witnessing.
(2)
References:
FSAR chapter 14, ISG Startup Schedule for Unit 1, Startup Technical Manual, RG 1.68 Initial Test Programs for Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, and, Startup Administrative Manual.
(3)
Findings:
The inspector verified by discussion and review that areas under Regulatory Guide'requirements and Final Safety Analysis Report commitments are addressed by specific procedures.
These areas are either covered by preoperational test procedures or by startup test procedures.
The following draft copies of preoperational and acceptance test procedures were received for review:
P 56.1C Revision
Rod Worth Minimizer P 49.1 Revision
Residual Heat Removal System P 50.1 Revision
Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System
P 54.1 Revision
Emergency Service Water P 55.1 Revision
Control Rod Drive Hydraulic P 28.1 Revision
ESSW Pump House H 5 V P 23.1 Revision
Diesel Fuel Oil P 60.1 Revision
Containment Atmosphere Circulation P 70.1 Revision
Standby Gas Treatment P 28.3 Revision
Standby Diesel Generator Building H 5 V
P 16.1 Revision
RHR Service Water H 45.2 Revision
Feed Water Control A 27.1 Revision
Auxiliary Boiler A 22.1 Revision
Makeup Demineralizer A 21.1 Revision
Water Pretreatment A 28.2 Revision
River Intake Structure H 5 V A 8.1 Revision
Domestic Water A 30.3 Revision
Control Structure Misc.
H 5 V
A 31.1 Revision
Computer Uninterruptible Power Supply A 38.1 Revision
Low Pressure Air A 42.1 Revision
Circulating Water A 28.4 Revision
Chlorination Building H 5 V A 28.5 Revision
Circulating Water Pump House H 5 V A 18.1 Revision
Instrument Air A 15.1 Revision
Turbine Building Closed Cooling Water
A 10. 1 Revi si on 0 Screens and Screen Wash A 9.2 Revision
Intake Structure Compressed Air A 9.1 Revision
River Water Makeup The licensee's representatives assured the inspector that approved procedures will be provided in a timely manner to afford timely inspector reviews.
The inspector had no further questions regarding these procedures at this time.
~TIIIT (1)
Discussion:
The inspector met with the ISG supervisor, quality supervisor, starting and testing coordinator, and N(A resident engineer, and discussed actual testing and test witnessing of systems and components.
The inspector submitted a list of tests to be witnessed by NRC inspectors, and requested the ISG supervisor or his representative to give the inspector prior notice of the.exact time that the test is to be conducted.
The notice and witnessing by NRC is not intended to interfere with PPSL's test scheduling or test sequencing.
(2)
Findings:
The inspector was informed that he would be notified in a timely manner, of tests to be performed, test scheduling and changes or cancellations of testing.
The inspector had no further questions in this area at this time.
d.
ualit Assurance and ualit Control (I)
Discussion:
The inspector met with the quality supervisor and dis-cussed the quality assurance
- quality control interface, transition from preoperational testing into startup testing, quality control functions and areas, and, preoperational tests and test witnessin (2)
References:
Startup Administrative Manual, Plant Administrative Procedures Manual, and, guality Assurance Manual.
(3)
Findings:
As a result of discussions and review of documents, no discrepancies were noted and the inspector had no further questions at this time.
3.
Plant Tours The inspector made several tours of the facility including the following areas:
The Reactor Containment, reactor building, and reactor, Control room, Upper and lower cable spreading rooms, Relay room, Turbine building, Primary containment and dry well area, Reactor pressure vessel, both internally and externally, Battery rooms; including related battery chargers, and, Diesel generator rooms.
The inspector observed work in progress, housekeeping, cleanliness controls, storage and protection of components, piping and systems.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
These areas will be inspected during future inspections.
The inspector had no further questions at this time.
4.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on June 14, 1979, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1).
The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discusse J JJ 0