IR 05000387/1979017
| ML17138A734 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna  |
| Issue date: | 06/15/1979 |
| From: | Caphton D, Mcnatt T, Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17138A733 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-387-79-17, NUDOCS 7908130663 | |
| Download: ML17138A734 (9) | |
Text
'.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report'o.
50"387/79"17 Docket No. 50-387 License No. CPPR-101 Priority Category B
Licensee:
Pennsylvania Power and Iight Company Two North Ninth Street Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101 Facility Name:
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Inspection at:
Berwick, Pennsylvania Inspection conducted:
May 8-10, 1979 Inspectors:
. H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector Approved by:
D. L. Cap on, Chief, Nuclear Support Section No.
1, ROGNS Branch
'A 5a 7f da e signed C -Z+-'7'P date signed b /6 ate igned Ins ection Summa Ins ection on Ma 8-10 1979 (Re ort No. 50-387/79-17)
A~I inspectors of the preoperational test program including test program organization and administration, document control, design changes and modifications, plant and preventive maintenance, and equipment protection and cleanliness; preoperational test procedures and test sequencing; plant administrative procedures, quality assurance and quality control functions and interface; tours of the facility; and, followup on previous inspection items.
The inspection involved 46.0 inspector-hours on-site by two regional based inspectors.
Results:
No items of noncompliance were identifie DETAILS Persons Contacted Penns lvania Power and Li ht Co an Mr.
Mr.
Hr'o Mr.
"Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
"-Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
L. Ballard, Senior Analyst H. Block, Senior Project Engineer J. Bradford, Quality Supervisor P. Capotosto, NQA Project Engineer T. Clymer, Senior Analyst N. Curtis, Vice President, Engineering and Construction R. Dunn, Superi'ntendent of Plant H. van Eeden, Assistant ISG, Supervisor E. Gorski., Senior Nuclear Quality Specialist J.
Green,, Resident NQA'ngineer G. Kuczynski, Starting and Testing Field Engineer T. Yezerski, Starting and Testing Coordinator Bechtel Power Co oration Mr.. G. Smith, ISG Supervisor U.S'. Nuclear Re ulato Commission-Mr., R., Gallo, Resident. Reactor. Inspector
+Denotes those present, at the exit interview.
2..
Status of Previous Ins ection Findin s (Open) Inspector Followup Item (387/79-08-01).
Incorporation of test personnel qualifications into administrative manual and appoint-ment of personnel to positions.
The situation and staffing of these positions and the incorporation of qualifications into the administrative manual is in progress.
Completion of licensee actions in this area will be reviewed on a subsequent inspection.
(Open) Inspector Followup Item (387/79-08-02).
Ensure that assigned members of test staff have compIeted required administrative manual training.
This training is in progress and will be completed prior to active involvement in preoperational testing.
This area will be reviewed on'subsequent inspections.
3.
Overall Prep erational Test Pro ram Re uirements a.
Prep erational Test Pro ram
Discussion:
The inspector met with the integrated startup group supervisor and discussed
'seven phases of the preoperational test program requirements.
The following areas were highlighted. and are to be reviewed in subsequent inspections:
Test.'program, Test program administration, Document control, Design changes and'odifications, Plant and preventive maintenance, and Equipment protection and cleanliness.
References:
Review of the following references was initiated during this inspection:
Startup Administrative Manual, Final Safety Analysis Report, Chapter 14, Regulatory Guide 1.68, Initial Test Programs for. Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, Plant Administrative Procedures Manual, Quality Assurance Manual, and Generic and Detailed Test Procedures.
Findings:
As a result of the initial review of these references and discussions with licensee representatives, no discrepancies were noted, and the inspector had no further questions at this time.
The review of documents and discussions with licensee represen-.
tatives will continue during future inspections.
Test Procedures and Test Se uencin Discussion:
The inspector met with licensee representatives and discussed availability, status, and test sequencing of the following types of procedures:
Preoperational Test Procedures, Acceptance Test Procedures, and Startup Test Procedure The following draft copies of preoperational and acceptance test. procedures were received for review:
P 4:.1, Revision
4.16 KV'ystem..
P 5.lDRevision 0 Non-ESS'80 Volt MCC and AuxiU.aries P 14.1, Revision
Reactor Building Cooling Mater P 70.1, Revision
Standby Gas Treatment System A 19.1, Revision
General Service Air System A 43.2, Revision
Condensex Tube Cleaning System Pindings:
The licensee's representatives assured the inspector that procedures will be provided in a timely manner to afford timely inspector reviews.
Areas of concern in procedure reviews will be addressed in subsequent inspections.
The inspector had no further questions regarding these procedures at, this time.
Quality Assuxance and Quality Control Discussion:
The inspector. met with the licensee's representatives and discussed the following areas:
Quality Assurance organization and program, Quality control function's and areas, Quality assurance-quality control interfaces, and Transition phase from construction through preoperational testing into operation.
References:
The following documents were reviewed during this inspection:
Quality Assurance Manual Startup Administrative Manual Plant Administrative Procedures Manual As a result of'discussions with licensee's representatives and review of documents, no discrepancies were noted at this time.
Review in this area will be continued during subsequent inspection.
Plant Tours The inspector made several tours of the facility including the
'ollowing areas:
Reactor pressure vessel, both internally and externally, Containment -and reactor building, Control room, Upper and lower cable spreading rooms, and Relay and computer rooms.
The inspector observed work in progress, housekeeping, cleanliness controls,. storage and protection of components, piping and systems.
No items. of noncompliance were identified and no discrepancies were noted.
5.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on May 10, 1979, an exit meeting, was conducted with the licensee's senior site representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1).
The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discusse 'E