IR 05000382/1987027

Insp Rept 50-382/87-27 on 871214-18.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Emergency Detection & Classification,Protective Action Decisionmaking & Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program

ML20234F070
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	12/31/1987
From:	Fisher W, Hackney C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20234F023	List: IR 05000382/1987027 ML20234F020
References
50-382-87-27, NUDOCS 8801110315
Download: ML20234F070 (4)

Text

- ye , .

,4

,

N'

, 'I

. ' f) '. '

-

. .2

< s .

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-382/87-27 Operating License: NPF-38 Docket: 50-382 Licensee: Lousisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L)

317 Baronne Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Facility Name: Waterford 3 Inspection At: Taft, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: December 14-18, 1987 Inspector: ifabo ,)fRLhun A - / .2 - 3 c " 8 7 C. A. Hackney, Emergency Prepgedness Date Specialist, Nuclear Materials and Emergency Preparedness Branch Approved: z #4 / t. _ 3 f - 77

,-W. L. Fisher, Chief, Nuclear Materials and Date i Emergency Preparedness Branch Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted December 14-18, 1987 (Report 50-382/87-27)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of emergency detection and classification, protective actica decisionmaking, knowledge and performance of duties, and operational status of emergency preparedness progra Results: Within the areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie PDR G ADOCK 05000382pyg

. _ _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ _ __ -

o . .

l l 2 DETAILS l Persons Contscted

• R. Barkhurst, Vice President, Nuclear

• N. Carnes, Plant Manager

• Gerrets, Nuclear Services Manager

• Lockhart, Manager, Management Systems

• Englebracht, Emergency Planning Manager

• Backes, Nuclear Quality Assurance Manager

• J. Lewis, Onsite Emergency Planning Coordinator

• Marler, Health Physics Instructor

• Cornell, Mechanical Engineer, Nuclear

• Johnson, Instructor

• LaBonte, Radiation Protection Superintendent

• Pendergrass, Shift Supervisor

• Brown, Shift Supervisor

• McGaha, Assistant Plant Manager, Operations

• Richoux, Plant Manager, Waterford 1 & 2

• Hill, Operations Superintendent, Waterford 1 & 2 Others'

• J. Wilson,- Project Manager, Headquarters, NRC

• J. Jaudons, Chief, Project Section A, Region IV, NRC

• W. Smith, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC

1. J. Lucas, Emergency Preparedness Director, St. Charles Parish I #B. Madere, Civil Defense Director and Director of Public Safety l St. John The Baptist Parish

• Denotes those who attended the exit intervie # Telephone interview.

l Emergency Detection and Classification (82201)

l l The NRC inspector reviewed appropriate sections of the Emergency Plan and interviewed licensee representatives to determine if key emergency response personnel understood the standard emergency classification and action level scheme according to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4).

Four simulaced emergency walk-throughs were conducted with six licensee

.

personne The NRC inspector determined that selected emergency response personnel designated as primary or alternate responders in the emergency organization were aware of the four emergency classifications as described in Section 3'of the Emergency Plan. Additionally, personnel were aware of their individual authorities and responsibilities as delineated in the Emergency Pla The NRL inspector observed'during the walk-throughs that the personnel selected for participation demonstrated adequate

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i

.

t , .

3 understanding of their emergency roles and performed their assigned l functions satisfactoril )

.

The NRC inspector discussed the following observation with the licensee during the exit interview:

• Consideration should be given for revising the onsite personnel assembly procedur The procedure should address any special assembly requirements for essential and nonessential personnel on back shifts and holiday shift . Protective Action Decisionmaking (82202)

The NRC inspector reviewed the Emergency Plan Section 5.0, and interviewed j both licensee and offsite representatives to determine whether emergency response personnel had the capability to perform their assigned functions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9)(10) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E.I Four simulated emergency walk-throughs were conducted with six licensee personnel. Additionally, the NRC inspector had telephonic communication with two offsite Parish official The NRC inspector determined that the selected individuals were able to properly identify and classify an accident according to the parameters identified by the NRC inspecto ,

i The Parish representatives stated that both agencies had primary and backup representatives in key areas, Both Parish representatives stated that they could respond to an emergency on a 24-hour basi . Knowledge and Performance of Outies (82206)

The NRC inspector reviewed the documents listed below and interviewed .

licensee representatives to determine whether emergency response personnel !

understood their emergency response roles and could perform their assigned '

functions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1). Four simulated emergency walk-throughs were conducted with six licensee personne Documents Reviewed:

Emergency Plan, Section 8.0, Revision 11 Nuclear Training Procedure-203, Revision 0. December 15, 1987 Nuclear Training Course 216 Revision 0, June 5, 1987 Nuclear Training Course 217, Revision 0, June 4, 1987 Selected emergency response personnel training records The NRC inspector determined that a formal emergency training program had been established, and that personnel designated as primary or alternate responders in the emergency organization had been provided with appropriate training in accordance with licensee requirement The NRC

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

- _ _ _ _ _ - . . _ - _ _

1. ., ,

inspector observed during the walk-throughs that selected personnel demonstrated adequate understanding of their emergency roles and performed their assigned functions satisfactoril 'ihe NRC inspector discussed the following observations with the licensee during the exit intervie * Record keeping should be reviewed to assure that individual training summary printout records reflect the actual course taugh . Operational Status of the Emergency Preparedness Pronram (82701)

The NRC inspector i<.terviewed licensee representatives to determine whether emergency response personnel understood their emergency response roles and could perform their assigned functions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1).

The NRC inspector selected at random and interviewed six licensee personnel. The selected individuals had received licensee required trainin Additionally, the personnel were aware of their individual responsibilitie . Inspector Observation An inspector observation is a matter discussed with the licensee during the exit interview. Observations are neither violations, deviations, nor unresolved items. They have no specific regulatory requirements, but are suggestions for the licensee's consideration. Observations are identified-in paragraphs 2 and 4 of this repor . Exit Interview The NRC inspector met with the NRC resident inspector and licensee representatives denoted in paragraph 1 on December 18, 1987, and l

summarized the scope and findings of the inspection as presented in this repor ,

!

l l

__ __ A