IR 05000382/1987016

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-382/87-16 on 870803-07.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection & Fire Prevention Program & Implementation
ML20235B030
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/18/1987
From: Hunter D, Murphy M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20235B027 List:
References
50-382-87-16, NUDOCS 8709230503
Download: ML20235B030 (8)


Text

[

!

'

.... .,

f APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

-NRC Inspection Report: 50-382/87-16 License: NPF-38 Docket: 50-382 Licensee: Louisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L)

317 Baronne Street l New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Facility Name: Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Inspection At: Taft, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: August 3-7, 1987 Inspector: 9/ 7 M. E. ~Murphyf Proj6ct Mtpector, Project 06te '

Section B, Reactor Projects Branch l

/

/ /

/' "' s l' 1 ) /3 N Approved: 4 /)

4. Date 3 hReactolyProjectsBranchpnter, Chief,ProjectSectionB Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted August 3-7, 1987 (Report 50-382/87-16)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of fire protection / prevention program and implementatio Results: Within the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie B709230503 97agg3 PDR ADOCK 05000392 G PDR i

.. . .

..

. .. __ _ _ _ _ - . - - _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . - - . -_ _ _ - _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _

,,

A V :.u.: a it

.f; . .

l-

<

DETAILS Persons Contacted

!  ;*N. Carns, Plant' Manager, Nuclear L *S. Alleman, Assistant Plant Manager, Technical Services

  • R. Bordner, Fire Protection &~ Safety R. Crawley, Safety Engineer L *A.' Holder, Fire. Protection &' Safety
J. Howard, Technical Specification Coordinator

'W.EJohnson, Nuclear Instructor'

G. Koehler, Operations Quality Assurance (QA)

A. Lockhart, Manager, Nuclear Operations Support & Assessments

  • D. Rothrock, Licensing L
  • G. Wuller, Licensing Coordinator
  • Denotes attendance at exit intervie In addition to the above personnel,.the NRC inspector also met with various operations, engineering, technical support, and administrative members of 1 the licensee's. staff.' i Licensee Event Report (LER) Followug The following LERs were reviewed'and close The'NRC inspector verifie that reporting requirements had been met, that causes had been identified, that corrective actions appeared appropriate, that generic applicability had been considered, and that the LER forms were complet Additionally, the NRC inspector confirmed that no unreviewed safety questions were involved, and that violations of regulations-or technical specification (TS) conditions had been identifie (Closed) LER 382/85-37, " Fire Seal Impairments."

(. Closed) LER.382/87-13, " Fire Wrap Not Installed Due to Inadequate Modification Implementation." Fire Protection / Prevention Program g This inspection.was to evaluate the'overall adequacy of the licensee's program and1to determine that the licensee was implementing the program in-conformance with-regulatory requirements and industry guides and standard The NRC inspector reviewed the following Waterford procedures:

,

i b

- ' '

I . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ . .

. _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ .

. . .

Number Title Revision Date FP-1-013 Fire Protection Program Plan 3 01/31/87 FP-1-014 Duties of a Fire Watch 3 02/23/87 FP-1-015 Fire Protection System Impairments 3 02/23/87 FP-1-016 Hot Work Activities 4 03/23/87 FP-1-017 Transient Combustibles and Hazardous 4 02/23/87 Materials FP-1-018 Pre-Fire Strategies 3 02/23/87 FP-1-019 Fire Brigade Equipment 3 03/02/87 FP-1-020 Fire Emergency / Fire Report 4 01/31/87 FP-1-021 Fire Barrier Removal and Restoration 4 02/23/87 FP-1-022 Station Modification Fire Protection / 1 06/12/87 Safe Shutdown Review This review verified that the licensee had technically adequate procedures to implement the fire protection program. Procedural guidance was provided to control combustible material and reduce fire hazard Administrative procedures also provided for maintenance and surveillance or fire suppression, detection, and support equipment. Personnel training, qualifications, and responsibilities were adequately provide Maintenance evolutions that significantly increase fire risk were properly 3 controlle The NRC inspector toured accessible areas of the plant site for general area condition, work activities in progress, and visual condition of fire protection systems and equipmen Combustible materials and flammable and combustible liquid and gas usage were restricted or properly controlled in areas containing safety-related equipment and component Items checked included positions of selected valves, fire barrier condition, hose stations, hose houses, halon system lineups, fire lockers, and fire extinguishers for type, location, and conditio .

There was no welding, cutting, or use of open flame ignition sources found in the areas toured. There was some minor construction work in the yard areas, but access to hose houses and hydrants was not impaired. There was

no construction activity noted inside the building areas toured. Some maintenance work and surveillance testing was noted. General housekeeping conditions were found to be very good. Fire brigade equipment, including emergency breathing apparatus, was found to be properly stored and i maintained. Locker cleanliness could be improved, j

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

__ . _ _

a>, .

Fire protection systems and equipment installed for protection of safety-related areas were found to be functional and tested in accordance with the requirements specified in the TSs. A few data recording errors were noted and identified to the licensee. These errors did not alter the procedural result The NRC inspector also reviewed fire brigade training and drill record The records were in order and confirmed that training and drills were being conducted at the specified interval The last annual and triennial QA audits in the area of fire protection, SA-W3-QA-86-11 dated April 10, 1986, and SA-87-016.1 dated March 24, 1987, were reviewed by the NRC inspector. The audits were comprehensive and in depth. System / equipment alterations, tests, surveillance, maintenance, records, and overall program procedures were addressed. Discrepancies identified were formally presented to the affected organizatio Responses were tracked to closecut and actions taken were reviewed for adequac There were no violations or deviations identified in this area of the inspectio . Exit Interview An exit interview was conducted on August 7, 1987, with those personnel denoted in paragraph 1 of this report. At this exit interview, the NRC inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspectio I i

b I

J 1 \

l t

l 3