IR 05000382/1987007
| ML20215A626 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1987 |
| From: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Dewease J LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8706170007 | |
| Download: ML20215A626 (2) | |
Text
e f%,
"'
JUN 101987 l
In' Reply Refer To:
l Docket: 50 382/87-07-
Louisiana Power & Light? Company-
!
ATTN:.J. G. Dewease, Senior Vice President
'
Nuclear Operations N-80 317 Baronne Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your. letter of May 29,1987,. in response to our letter and l
Notice of Violation dated April 29, 1987. We have reviewed your reply and find
it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice'of Violation. We will
!
review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection
'
'to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintained.
Sincerely, Original Signed By J. E. Gagliardo J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc:
Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN:
G. E. Wuller, Onsite
,
Licensing Coordinator
{
'
P. 0. Box B Killona,-Louisiana.
70066 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN:
N.~ S. Carns, Plant Manager j
P 0.:B.ox B
'
Killona, Louisiana 70066 Middle South Services ATTN: Mr. R. T. Lally.
P. O. Box 61000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 (cccont'dnextpa PI '
C:P '
C:RPB '
.
MESL w:cs JPQu n JEGagi a do
/h 6/1/87 6/ g 7 6/s/8 M
'
8706170007 870610
{DR ADOCK0500g2 H
,
c/ : s? r..
.t.-
n:
'
s
,
_,
,t
.
.,
g:
- Louisiana-Power & Light.Compan9-2-0:
Louisiana Power l& Light. Company p.
' ATTN:' :K.: W. Cook, Nuclear Safety and -
'-
Regulatory. Affairs Manager-
'
317'Baronne Street
~P.10.'. Box 60340
.
- New' Orleans, Louisiana.
70160 -
i
,,..
...
.
Louisiana Radiation _. Control-Program Director.
~
,
c'
LbectoDMB(IE01)
!
. bcc.distrib. by RIV:'
RPB'
'D. Weiss, RM/ALF R. D.' Martin, RA RRI-
.
.
DRSP SectionChief'(RPB/A).
.
RPSB-
.
RSB C
MIS Sistem,
Project Inspector, RPB
,
RSTS Operator R. Hall RIV File NRR Project' Manager-
-i q
..,
,
!
!
,
!
.
[',*
,
d
LOUISI AN A / 317 BARONNE STREET
P. O. BOX 60340 (504) 595-3100 POWER & LIGHT NEW ORLEANS, LOUISlANA 70160
Ut ikNs'ysit$
May 29, 1987 W3P87-1069 A4.05 QA
@7 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk I
j
Washington, D.C. 20555 g
l jgg7 j
- .
'i Subject: Waterford 3 SES
_
-
l Docket No. 50-382
"
License No. NPF-38 NRC Inspection Report 87-07 Attached is the Louisiana Power and Light Company (LP&L) response to Violation No. 8707-01 identified in Inspection Report No. 87-07.
If you have any questions on the response, please contact G.E. Wuller, Operational Licensing, at (504) 464-3499, Very truly yours, l
/
wh K.W. Cook Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Affairs Manager i
KWC:PTH:ssf Attachment cc: : U Martin, NRC Region IV 5.*
Calvo, NRC-NRR i
J.H. Wilson, NRC-NRR NRC Resident Inspectors Office E.L. Blake-89@filp9995 S
.
"'"'"'"'" "
'
q C
'
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" Ay gc-97 lblo
. - - -
-
,
f E s Att:chmnt to
)
W3P87-1069 Shest 1 of 2
-;
(
LP&L Response To Violation No.~8707-01 VIOLATION NO. 8707-01 l
Technical Specification (TS).6.8.1.a requires, in part, that written procedures be implemented for the applicable procedures recommended in'
,
Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. Two I
examples of failure to follow these procedures are listed below:
1.
Surveillance testing of emergency power systems is one of the applicable. procedures recommended in paragraph 8.b of Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.
ME-3-220, Revision 4, " Station Battery Bank and Charger," is an approved surveillance procedure for testing a portion of the emergency power system.
Step 8.3.15 of ME-3-220, Revision.4', requires, " Operations isolate the charger from its 125 Vdc PDP by danger-tagging (OPEN) the charger's output circuit breaker on the PDP."
Contrary to the above, on March 10, 1987, Section 8.3 of ME-3-220, Revision 4, was performed on Battery Charger 3AB-1, and the charger was not isolated from its 125 Vdc PDP by a danger tag as required by l
'
Step 8.3.15.
2.
Procedures for maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment are recommended in paragraph 9.9 of Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2,. February 1978.
MM-12-007,-
Revision 1, " Pipe Hanger Support Installation, Fabrication, Removal,"
is an approved procedure for maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment. Step 9.5.10 of MM-12-001 requires the installation of lock wire on snubber flange bolts during i
installation, i
contrary to the above, on March 20, 1987 Snubbers SIRR-1055, SISR-1064, SISR-704, CCSR-1067A, CCSR-1067B, SISR-961A, SISR-961B, and SI'? 1064 were found to be installed without lockwire on the snubber j
W nge bolts.
l
This is a Severity Level V violation.
.
l RESPONSE i
,
l-(1) Reason for the Violation For both items identified in the violation Waterford 3 maintenance personnel failed to strictly follow procedures for performing l
maintenance on plant equipment.
(2) Corrective Action That Has Been Taken The following actions have been taken to address the failure of personnel to follow procedures. The Assistant Plant Manager, l
Operations and Maintenance issued an Operations and Maintenance Directive (O&M Directive #16) on April 15, 1987, on the subject of
..
.
N,/ ' " *
Attachm:nt to W3P87-1069 Sheet 2 of 2 (
procedure compliance. On April 20 and 21 meetings were held with Operations and'Haintenance Department supervisors and craft personnel to discuss the importance of procedural compliance.
For procedure ME-3-220, there is no technical requirement to danger tag the battery charger's output circuit breaker in order to perform the procedure. The procedure, as written, was very restrictive with respect to tagging for an item in which there was no hazard to
.
personnel or equipment.
l To address the concern for not lockwiring nutt on snubber flange bolts the manufacturer was consulted.
It was determined that lockwiring is not required as long as proper torque is applied during snubber assembly. As a result, no action is considered necessary to correct field conditions.
In both items above, it has been determined that no technical issues are involved. The above actions are considered sufficient to avoid further violations.
(3) Corrective Action To Be Taken Procedures ME-3-220 and MM-12-001 are being revised to delete the unnecessary requirements.
The revisions are expected to be, completed by June 5, 1987.
(4) Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliar.ce will be achieved by June 5,1987.
e
,
\\
l
1 a