IR 05000382/1980027
| ML19339C742 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/08/1980 |
| From: | Crossman W, Randy Hall, Andrea Johnson, Martin L, Stewart R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339C739 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-80-27, NUDOCS 8011190289 | |
| Download: ML19339C742 (4) | |
Text
O'
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0!? FISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
Report No. 50-382/80-27 Docket No. 50-382 Category A2 Licensee: Louisiana Power and Light Company 142 Delaronde Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 Facility Name: Waterford S eam Electric Station, Unit No. 3 Inspection at: Waterford Sites, Taft, Louisiana Inspection conducted: September 13-26, 1980 l
Inspectors:
/
-
/c/ 6tr)
1_;
_
~
. E. Martin, Reactor Inspector, Projects Section Date Af J
nM y.. A. R.' Johnson, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Dade '
Support Section u
Reviewed:
[
/0!8!/0
_wp
. C. Stewart, Reactor Inspector, Projects Section Dat e'
Approved:
-
/0!8 8d 2;-
W. A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section Date'
/
/&
'
R. E. Hall, Chief, Engineering Support Section D/te/
E01119 9 ${$q,
.. -
.
. _
.
.
.
Inspection Sununary; Inspection on September 23-26,1980 (Report No. 50-382/80-27)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of construction activities related to electrical cable installation, including receiving, qualification, and installation documentation and records. The inspection involved fif ty-four inspector-hours by two NRC inspectors.
,
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
_
_
_
--
.- - -___ - _.- -_-___---__.
J
.
DETAILS 1-
?ersons Contacted Principal Licensee Employees
- L. L. Bass QA Manager
- B. P. Brown, QA Engineer R. G. Pittman, QA Engineer R. G. Bennett, QA Engineer J. Woods, Operations, QC Engineer I. Hussain, Project Engineer Other Personnel E. J. Ritzmann, Project QC Manager, Fischbach and Moore (F&M)
The IE inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel including members of the engineering and QA/QC staff.
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
2.
Site Tour The IE inspectors walked through the Reactor and Auxiliary Buildings to observe construction activities in progress and to inspect for housekeeping.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
3.
Electrical Cables and Terminations The IE inspectors reviewed the cable pull cards, termination cards, inspector reports and receiving records of Fischbach and Moore (F&M)
for forty cables.
The following documents were revim-d by the IE inspectors for complete-ness and compliance with appropritte F&M procedures and FSAR commitments:
Receiving Inspection Check Lists (RICs) 133-5152, 5958, 6057, 6129, 5145, 6141, 5574, 5310, M19, 5921, 6074, 6024, 6072, 6127, 5833, 6059, 5222, 5173, 5131, 5342, 5316, 5176, 5320 5199, 5118, 5140, 5102, 5513, 6059, 5327, 5328, 5152, 5253 and 5261.
F6M Rework Sheet 439 F&M Nonconformance Report (NCR) W3-253, Supp. 1 Ebasco NRC W3-1944 F&M Inspector Report 307-43-57
s
.
.
The above RICs' are for reels of cable and therefore include documentation for all cables pulled from a given reel.
The IE inspectors reviewed in detail the cable pulling check list and termination check list for forty of the cables covered under tha above listed RICs.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified-4.
Follow-Up on Report Deficiency 10 CFR 50.55(e) Anaconda Conduit The IE inspectors discussed with the licensee the status of the cover failure on the Anaconda flexible liquid tight wiring conduit reported to the NRC on August 1,1980. The IE inspectors also reviewed the Anaconda report dated August 29, 1980, along with Anaconda Technical Data Report 3727 and attachments. The IE inspectors had observed cracked coverings on the conduit in the plant which were similar to that discussed in the Anaconda report, and had observed coverings that were cracked in the shipping Boxes that the conduit was originally shipped in.
The cracked covering in the storage yard was not addressed in the Anaconda Report; however, it is of the same type reported by the licensee and will be included in his analysis and corrective action.
The licensee is to submit his final report on this reportable deficiency by September 30, 1980.
5.
Exit Interview The IE inspectors met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on September 26, 1980, and summarized the purpose, scope and findings of the inspection.
'
-_._