IR 05000382/1980021
| ML19338F663 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1980 |
| From: | Crossman W, Stewart R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19338F661 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-80-21, NUDOCS 8010270026 | |
| Download: ML19338F663 (3) | |
Text
[ ' :p
'l
-
T
- ' i
'
& Sg
_
.
'-
.
,
Qyx 3
"
.~
U. S... NUCLEAR-REGULATORY.- COMISSION
-
UFFICE:OF1 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT'
-
-
,
.
,
pp REGION IVL
,
'
'
Report No.. 50-382/80-21
, Docket No. 50-382.
Category A2
,
Licensee: LLouisiana Power and Light Company-
-142:Dela'ronde Streat
'
,
'New-Orleans, Louisiana J0174-Facility:= Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3
-
Inspection at: 'WathfordSite,$Taft.. Louisiana Inspectionconducted:. August 19-22,1980
~
Ins'pector:
/
'
,
- R. C. Stewart, ReaMnspector,' Projects Section Eate '
j 9 /M ~
~
~
Approved:-.
- : a ---
-W.3A. Crossman, Chief, Projects Section D&te'
>
Inspection.. Summary:-
Inspec' tion-on August 19-22,-1980 (Report No.- 50-382/80-21)-
,,"'
Areas Inspected:. Routine, unannounced inspection of construction activities
related to a. follow-on review of previously identified unresolved items. The-
'. inspection -invol'ved eighteen inspector-hours'by one NRC inspector.
~ Results: ~ No items?of-noncompliance or deviations were identified, t.
?*
s~
I f
- &,~.
.
_
m,
, -
!
n m
M
'
$5Gt7DD&
...
.w n
.
-
- '.
9. '.
~
,
,
,
n w,2 1 s;x c a
.
c
.
.
.
, aia;p&f _ g )
W DVM = v,~ - E '=~ T 3"
'L
-
'
'
'
m g,w -
m
,
I."
>
sn I:fR klg &:
o,--
a g
-
-
. e s
f
-
.
);;
_
,'
'
~
~
M[f
,
S :;t MP v,
' m ew-W L.n ~,
-
en-
,
.
Y * '
,
,
,
,,,
-
,-
o y 4? ~ ~
_
1 3,o, m
e
$,1 E.s ' 1 t e
-
,
,
- %
.
.
&.y; '
'
'
DETAILS-
,
,
.
>
,
'y
.vm,
~
..-
.
.
~
,
.
~
~j!1.,LPersonUContacted':'
-
s.
,
.
Principal Liconsee' Employees
,
L (*T.-Gerrets QAkManager
'
.-
1*8.; Brown, QA Engineer
,
'*8.;Toups.~QA Engineer
~
y
- L.Ll Bass, Project QA Manager,
,
%
. R2 Sandridge ;QC Engineering Technician
'
!
- J. Woods, QC Engineer-U
-
'
.
.
a
~
Other Personnel-
.
"l
'R. Hartnett,'QA Site-Supervisor Ebas_co
.-
L.~ Stinson. Site QA Program Manager,'Ebasco T
R. Ronquillo. QA Manager, Gulf Engineering.
3. Ward, QA Supervisor, Sline Industrial Painters -
11 Buck,'~QC Supervisor,'Sline Industrial-Painters-C. Reid,l Field Engineer, Nuclear Installation _ Services Company hhe IE' inspector also interviewed other licensee and contractor personnel.
includbg members of the engineering and QA/QC staffs.
. _ Denotes those attending the exit interview.-
I
2.
Licensee Action on PrevioustInspection Findings-
.I i
. (Closed). Construction Deficiency-Report: Unsatisfactory Impact Tests 'on
- 1
,
,
Pipe. Penetration Assemblies-3 ^ and 4. LP&L Letter. Dated November 8. -1979.-
The IE inspector conducted a follow-on review of the licensee final. report
-
x
-
U relating to this; matter.. dated May:1,il980..As indic^.ted in the. report,_
,
-
=the deficiency warnotedJduring an Ebasco QA docuer.c review and prior tol
-
+
-installation of the assemblies. tThe penetration?.ssemblies-(ASMEiclass:2:
'
~
.
process __ pipe) were. subsequently returned.toTthe vendorLfor. rework'.,~It-was observed by'the IE-inspector:that both process' pipe sections were:
"
M.; f-
.in ~ accordance 'with a: qualified heat treatment process.e Charpy;"V"f notch muoved;from the assemblies'and. heat; treated to improve the impact = properties.-
.
i~
i 11mpactlestiresults:wererfound. acceptable on process _ pipe for= penetration sNo.44.D The process pipe for.. penetration.No.13-was replaced with: material.
.
<a
- meeting' specification requirements.
- The1IE inspector reviewed the Ebascos
-
.
yf
- Noncompl i ance' Report,1 W3-1695, J da ted - October 4,11979,'which contains:thei
_.
'-
final > resolution i _In addition', t;he :IE ; inspector reviewed the material.
.
'
J
'
icartification. records.and Charpy" impact. test records. (H-5313 and.H-5314). -
m. ' -
_
a -
~
'
'
ff 1This maherLisli:onsidered closed.-
}
,
-
-
.
-'
'
-
L,
.
(
m };n_
-
g.
kh
'
l-
-
,-
,
'
'
S2* -
'
-
ya ww a
-
.
y g;p o.qyfc, Q _
-
g7 m.
_
e %.
..
L yy
,3 amp.
.,
_ _
,
"
[_
'
~
5%hy;gggg ;tMG3
,,
_ _ _
.
,
s ja :
.g y
- g j
,y_
,
- ,
M
,
r
m m, a z. y, y m y - c wy v.
y! '+ - ^
,m W
'
- p ;. '.
~ Q&:C.
' M Q,[q w g a
,..p m e -
us,;g s
c
,
.
a
.
QGOlg :.
C&Ws:S ?D ' '
'* ^
W..~,,'
E
'
M
,
Q. Q y j % 9
' 3; - ~ k:VY%
'T
^
. -.
'
- .
'
,
-
,
+
-., y ye y,
y
-
,
,
<
WWW f. ?L:n :
y.
~,;f,<_
,
'
a
~
,
. C/, y,. - c. Switch 10perator Defectn LP&L Letter,: Dated 'May::10,1979. ' Genera 4(Closed)(Construction Deficiency!Reportf GEiSwitch Gear. BreakerLPosition
u e,.
t'
.. T >
JCompanyL(GE) had: advised Ebas'co ServicessInc.. of ta defect in the design-
_
.
'
$ JM ~
%ofdthe breaker position 1 switches:foundlin the 4.~16 KV switch gear supplied M
J'
> cto Waterford:3.g It wasefound thatithe breakerLposition switch operatori
&
t
@.
,'
imay:become oentLduelto interference with the~ circuit breaker.
~,
'
x-
--
,
.
,
r,
_
.,
....
3..
.... m F JW
' EA111 thirty-three~ breaker position. switchoperatorsofJthe<4.16KV: switch
~
Q'"
M'
gear have been; replaced lwithL newly 1 designed switch operator assemblies -
isupplied by GEk Neither'theiswitchinor the-' switch wiring had to be
'
,
_
FJdisturbed;in! replacing the operator assemblies.
'
~~
- *
..
-
.
..
10n'-siite QA/QC records, maintained by:Fischbach & Moore, reflects the quality; n
-
{
controlLdocumentation andiinspection ; activities maintained during the rework.-
_
v
,
.
_
_
v
'
Thismatteslis'consideredclosed.
-
(Closed)Onresc1ved'(50'-382/80-04):- Missing Painting QA/QC Documentation.
_During thiszinspection..thecIE inspector conducted a-follow-on review.of g-the corrective measures initiated by Sline Industrial Painters, Inc. re-
~
w
'gardingfthe missing surface preparation and coating records (SPCR):No.1 o'
- 1185 and 1191.: The missing' documents were portions of the permanent-g
-
'
-
inspection ' records on the painting of sections.of Reactor Building structual j
steelias-identified by thecSline QA/QC Discrepancy Report No. 52,.-dated February:29,,1980.. The Sline QA/QC: staff personnel conducted an extensive" d
',
~
documentation audit and records review which resulted in reconstruction 1of
'
the two SPCRs 1185-and:1191~..-The-basis for reconstruction and: supporting
-
O '
~ documentationiare! contained:in a~ detailed report prepared by the Sline -
N
,
'
aQA/QC" staff, dated August 20, 1980. The IE inspector l observed that support 1
-
-
a documents contained in theLreport includes _ daily notes, the Level I~ paint-log, inspection; reports,; production' records-time sheets. and work schedules.
"
^
LThe IE; inspector-had 'no further questions regarding the resolution of this
. matter. This item -is considered closed.
13. -
Site' Tour-
,
"
,
- The IELinspector walked through various construction'and storage areas to:
Mobserve:corstruction activities in: progress-'and to inspect the general-istateiof b eanliness and ' adherence to hensa W ping requirements.
e,
?
_
TNo: items}of noncompliance or deviations -
anti fied.-
-.
n
,
_
n n
vm_
,...
-
,'
i wi E4.
Exit? Interview?
- _
.,
_
.
w
-
'
JTheilE inspector mets ith licensee representatives (denoted in' paragraph' _ "
N w
---
.
-
J'
il)/at:the(conclusionofuthe.inspectiononAugust 22' 1980.
The1IE! inspector-
-
_
,
%w
-
4summarizedjthejpurpose and the~ scope of'the inspection and the findings.
-
.gg
,
.
+
,
.;
~
' ~
, ;
.
- l
,,
v Ci
- [ " '#
J y
_
,
,, p y
,
,
,
,
p
~
,
.
.
-
,
N@
M ing
"[V
^2
-
s-3a-
-(
,
,
hW * n, a m, ufg, _c_,
-
+
'
'
S
'
e
- 3 -y-c
,-
e y _
, Q WQff -j;f,n
..,
}'
,.,
'm
_
l}W ; l
/,.
.
,_
,
h kkk W,
?
Yf kV.
' l~ 4
.2
,..
N
'