IR 05000348/1993018

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-348/93-18 & 50-364/93-18 on 930706-09 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Support,Alarm Stations,Communications, Detection & Assessment Aids & Security Training
ML20046B305
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1993
From: Mcguire D, Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20046B303 List:
References
50-348-93-18, 50-364-93-18, NUDOCS 9308040048
Download: ML20046B305 (1)


Text

-.

.-

.

.

,

1 !

UNITED STATES

  1. p nga%,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

.-

.fe-4 REGION ll

f g

101 MARIETTA STREET. N.W., SUITE 2900

!

p ATLANTA, GEORGIA 303234199

\\...../

.

!

Report Nos.

50-348/93-18 and 50-364/93-18

!

Licensee:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

l 600 North.18th Street Birmingham, AL 35291-0400

r Docket Nos.

50-348 and 50-364 License Nos. NPF-2 and NPF-8

'

Facility Name:

Farley 1 and 2 i

Inspection Conducted:. July 6 - 9, 1993 l

Inspeetor:

[

') u

')rrrr1GF)1 7-M- M D. Thompson, Safeguards' inspector Date Signed i

v

Accompanying Personnel: D.McGuire, Chief,SafeguardsSection

!

Approved by:

b.

dk 3

'

D. McGuire, Ch'ief

[ Tate Signed

Safeguards Section

,

Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch i

Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

[

i SUMMARY

!

Scope:

l This routine, announced inspection was conducted in the areas of Management I

Support, Alarm Stations, Communications, Detection and Assessment Aids,

,

Security Training and Qualification Plan, and Land Vehicle Bomb Threat i

Contingency.

!

Results:

l In the areas inspected, one violation was identified. The management was very

pro-active and upgraded the training program, weaponary, and responfe

capability to enhance the overall security program. Central and Secondary

Alarm Station' operators were well trained and continued to demonstrate their i

professionalism while operating the alarm station.

The licensee had failed to j

follow their physical security plan concerning assessment of perimeter alarms.

l The training program was reviewed and considered well within regulatory and t

Training and Qualification Plan requirements.

s

!

,

i

,

'

ened hmsmi:ted heteeth

>

Docu

~

~ ~ ~ * - - ~ * " " * "

'

~ ~ " ~ "

aan SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIon

-- n a nOeO4004e[yyffe PDR ADOCK gge a

,

-

--

- - -

s a

e

,-n-,

,"-w