IR 05000344/1986001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-344/86-01 on 860106-10.No Noncompliance or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Nonlicensed Staff Training Program,Records Program & Receipt,Storage & Handling of Equipment & Matls Program
ML20137T559
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/1986
From: Dodds R, Pereira D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137T557 List:
References
50-344-86-01, 50-344-86-1, NUDOCS 8602180389
Download: ML20137T559 (7)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. . _ . . U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION V

Report No. 50-344/86-01 Docket No. 50-344 License No. NPF-1-Licensee: Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland,. Oregon 97204 Facility Name: Trojan Nuclear Plant Inspection at: Rainier, Oregon Inspection Condu ed: Ja uary 6-10, 1986 Inspector: av/

  1. fM#

/ 7 [[ D.

. Pereira, Reactor Inspector Date Signed Approved By: ' / Jf [ R.~T. Dodds, Chief Dife figned Reactor Project Section 1 Summary: Inspection During the Period of January 6-10, 1986 (Report No. 50-344/86-01) Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the Non-Licensed Staff Training Program, Records Program, and Receipt, Storage and Handling of Equipment and Materials Program. The inspection involved 38 hours onsite by one NRC inspector. The inspection modules followed were: Non-Licensed Staff Training (41700), Records Program (39701B), and Receipt, Storage and Handling of Equipment and Materials Program (38702B).

Results:.No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

8602180399 B60 W344 PDR ADOCK O PDR O

. . DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

  • W.

S. Orser, General Manager

  • C. A. Olmstead, Manager, Quality Assurance Department J. D. Reid, Manager, Plant Services D. L. Bennett, Supervisor, Control and Electrical D. W. Swan, Supervisor, Maintenance
  • C. H. Brown, Operations Branch Manager, Quality Assurance A. Puzy, Office Supervisor
  • S. Bauer, Engineer, Nuclear Safety and Regulation Department
  • H. F. Moomey, Trojan Resident, Oregon Department of Energy
  • S. Richards, Trojan Resident, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission D. McCormick, Instrument and Control Technician T. Gray, Instrument and Control Technician R. Lane, Instrument and Control Technician R. Williams, Mechanical Maintenance L. Vanover, Mechanical liaintenance G. Hilsonhoff, Mechanical Maintenance M. Olsen, Radiation Technician D. Seely, Radiation Technician P. Dodge, Secretary L. Thorpe, Maintenance C. Allen, Quality Control Inspector R. Phillips, Quality Control Inspector
  • Denotes attendance at exit interview conducted at Trojan Nuclear Plant on January 10, 1986.

2.

Non-Licensed Staff Training Program The overall training and retraining activities for non-licensed employees, and general training for licensed employees were examined for conformance with the Technical Specifications, quality assurance (QA) program requirements, and licensee commitments. The inspection included . a review of the approved training program and selected training records, and discussions with technical, craft and female employees.

The Trojan General Employee Training (GET) program is conducted by Administrative Order (AO)-9-1.

The GET program consists of a series of training sessior.s covering the following subjects: Radiation Protection, Prenatal Radiation Exposure, Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Respirator Training, Safety, Fire Protection, Quality Assurance, and Security. Personnel would only be permitted access to the plant when the applicable training was successfully completed.

The inspection results of the Trojan GET program were as follows: a.

The inspector reviewed changes made to Trojan's training program and verified that the revised program was in conformance with requirements and commitment. b.

The inspector interviewed by direct questioning one new, one existing, and one temporary employee whether administrative controls and procedures, radiological health and safety, industrial safety, controlled access and security procedures, emergency plan, and QA training was provided as required by the licensee's committed program, c.

The inspector interviewed by direct questioning of three craftsmen, three Instrumentation and Control (I&C) technicians, and four other non-licensed employees that on-the-job training, formal technical training commensurate with job classification, fire fighting training, and retraining to raintain proficiency were provided as required by the licensee's committed program.

d.

The inspector examined the training records of two shift technical advisors (STAS) and verified that STA training and retraining is being conducted in accordance with the licensee's committed program.

e.

The inspector verified by direct questioning of four female employees that female employees are provided instructions concerning prenatal radiation exposure.

The inspector noted the absence of a formal technical training program, and in further questioning of Trojan's Management, it was noted that for the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) training accreditation, additional personnel would be added to the training department to fulfill a technical training program requirement.

It is the understanding of < this inspector that Trojan was hiring an I&C technical trainer as well as Mechanical and Electrical training personnel. This program was to be in place and accredited by INPO by December, 1986. The only other comment mentioned by the personnel interviewed was the lack of personnel cross-trained in the same area; for example, rod control or relief valve repair. This comment was discussed with the Maintenance Supervisor who expressed a similar comment and assured the inspector that one of the goals of the proposed technical training program would be the cross-training of some personnel in each area, but not all personnel would be cross-trained. This area will be further inspected later during the year to check progress for the proposed INPO accreditation.

No violations or deviations were identified in this area.

3.

Records Program The records program was examined for conformance with the Trojan's Technical Specifications requirements, licensee commitments, and industry guides and standards.

The Trojan Plant ~ Records progrca was co0 ducted by Administrative Order (AO)-7-1.

This order establishes measures for the collection, identification, transfer, retention, and retrievability of records which furnish documentary evidence of quality.

In addition A0-7-1 defines which Quality Assurance (QA) records are to be maintained and delineates the retention requirements imposed by varir,us documents; one of the more important documents being the Standard Technical Specifications (STS),

. paragraphs 6.10.1 and 6.10.".. Paragraph 6.10.1 defines which records shall be retained for at least five years, and paragraph 6.10.2 defines which records shall be retained for the duration of the Facility Operating License.

The inspector verified that requirements and provisions have been established to maintain the types of records as defined in STS paragraphs 6.10.1 and 6.10.2.

The inspector varified that responsibilities have been assigned to assure that the records mentioned above are being maintained. The Office Supervisor has the responsibility of assuring the security of QA plant records by maintaining control of access to the Permanent Records' Storage Facility (PRSF).

The inspector verified that the following record storage controls have been established: a.

The record storage facility, as described in A0-7-1, was a two-hour fire rated environmentally-controlled storage area.

b.

A custodian in charge of storage facilities has been designated as responsible for inspecting, organizing, and implementing control of the QA records.

c.

A filing system was in use that allows for the retrieval of QA records.

d.

Provisions are available for governing access to the files and a sign-out card system was in use to maintain accountability of records removed from the storage facility.

e.

An established method for corrections or filing supplemental information and disposing of superceded records was in use.

The required review and approval process was specified in A0-7-1, Paragraph IV.B " Record Preparation on Site".

The inspector verified that provisions have been made which establishes retention periods for the-QA records in accordance with STS paragraphs 6.10.1 and 6.10.2.

The inspector verified that the following QA records are being maintained in accordance with the above administrative controls: File No.

Title 83.3c Temporary Test Data Sheets (AO-3-15) 93.5e Plant Operating Manual Revision Form 93.11g Fire Brigade Training - Initial Classroom Instruction Attendance 93.11h Fire Brigade Training and Drill Participations Crews 86.2 Non Licensed Operator Training 86.2a Auxiliary Operator Training 83.6 Periodic Engineering Test (PET) Data Sheets 83.5 Preoverhaul Test (POT) data sheets

..

.

64.36 QA Audit Reports 62.la "Q" Purchase Requests, Purchase Order ~ ~ 93.16 Onsite PRB Minutes 72.2 Operating Instructions Check-Off Lists (Valve Lineup) 72.4 Control Room Logs 71.la Equipment History File 71.lc Calibration Records q The inspector verified that the records selected above were controlled as follows: , (1) The record was' listed on a records ch'ck list or index.

e (2) The record was readily retrievable from its designated file.

(3) * he record was placed in folders.

(4) The ecord was stored in a suitable file cabinet.

' (5) The record storage was in a two-hour fire rated environmentally controlled storage area.

The inspector interviewed the record storage custodian to ensure that the retention period controls identified above were understood. The record storage custodian was quite knowledgeable and understood the retention , period controls and requirements.

The inspector verified that the environmental conditions and fire suppression systems (Halon) were as described in the STS.

No deviations or violations were identified in this area.

4.

Receipt, Storage and Handling of Equipment and Materials Program The receipt, storage ar.d handling of equipment and materials program was examined for conformance with Trojan's Technical Specifications requirements, licensee commitments and industry guides and standards.

, a.

Program Review.

The inspector verified that establishment of the several administrative concrols for receipt of safety-related items were in accordance with Trojan's procedures. Receipt inspection of all incoming safety-related materials and supplies is required by , Quality Control Procedure (QCP) - 17, entitled " Receipt Inspection of Quality Related Materials, Parts and Components", which , establishes the methods and requirements by which quality related material will be receipt inspected. Receipt inspection for shipping damage is required by QCP-17, paragraph IV.B " Physical Inspection".

Documentation of the receipt inspection is required to be prepared and retained in accordance with QCP-17, paragraph IV.E " Documentation of Receipt". The assurance that responsibilities of receipt. inspection are assigned in writing is required by Administrative Order (AO)-12-3, entitled " Material Receipt Inspections". The inspector verified that controls for the disposition of items received on site were established for acceptable items including tagging / marking for storage and immediate issue for use.

Controls for nonconforming items have been

. i . established which ensure marking, segregating, disposition, and documentation of nonconforming items, and are incorporated in Quality Assurance Procedure (QAP)-15-1, entitled " Identification and Reporting of Nonconforming Materials, Parts and Components." The inspector verified that requirements have been established to prohibit the use of equipment or materials in nonconformance status, and for notifying affected organizations of nonconforming items.

Controls for conditional release of items, including justification for use, documentation required, and authority for conditional release of the items are contained in Nuclear Division Procedure (NDP) 600-1 entitled " Identification and Control of Nonconforming Materials, Parts, and Components."

The inspector verified the establishment of the following administrative controls as specified in A0-12-4, entitled " Material Control and Identification": (1) Written requirements are issued providing for levels of storage and appropriate environnental conditions.

(Paragraph VI. A) (2) Storage controls including access, identification of items, coverings, and preservatives are issued.

(Paragraph III.F) (3) Requirements to conduct periodic inspections of the storage area are issued.

(Paragraph III.G) (4) The maintenance and care of items in storage are specified including shelf life.

(Paragraph III.G) (5) The responsibilities have been assigned for implementation of the above storage controls.

(Paragraph I) b.

Implementation The inspector selected a sample of safety-related items that have been received on site. The following items were inspected: (1) Consumables (a) LPO NQ - 2272 - Swage Lock Fittings (b) N - 29218-Swage Lock Reducing Union 5/8 tube to 1/2 tube (2) Mechanical (a) NQ - 00292 - Snubber PSA " (b) N - 30736 - Snubber PSA " (3) Electrical ! (a) N - 28226 - SPN000 - Electric Motor (b) NQ- 00290 - SMB000 - Electric Motor (4) Instruments L

,. _.

_ _. ,. ._.

.. .. ...-- . . ___ _ ,. ' n c".

4 . (a) N --04398 - 0-30 psig Ashcroft Pressure Gauge s ~The inspector was able to verify that the receipt inspections were conducted with. Trojan's Quality. Control Procedure (QCP)-17, disposition "of the items.was in accordance with controls for acceptable items, and storage of the items was proper. The tagging / marking allowed tracing the - item back to the purchase order documents,. receipt documents, and quality certification documents.

~ ~

. The licensee's receipt inspection program activities appear to be conducted in accordance with the licensee approved procedures and-instructions. The receipt. inspection program appears to. meet the i, requirements o'f regulatory guides, industry codes, and the Technical Specifications.

- No violations or deviations were identified in this area.

. . 5.

Exit Interview The inspector met with'the licensee representatives denoted in ' paragraph.1 on January 10, 1986, and summarized the scope and findings of the inspection activities.

~ i !' T '

a d

. < T \\ r /, . ,

e

r ..,, ~ ~. -,. .. - - ......... -... ..s.__-,_ . .. -, _.,..... - r _, e - r_, ,, - - - -, }}