IR 05000341/1980023
| ML20003E496 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1981 |
| From: | Byron P, Little B, Little W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003E495 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-80-23, NUDOCS 8104030690 | |
| Download: ML20003E496 (3) | |
Text
.-
,
O
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No. 50-341/80-23 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48226 Facility Name: Enrico Fermi Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 Inspection At: Fermi Site, Monroe, MI Inspection Conducted: De aber 1 through 31, 1980
//
'
- /s.
MJD/[/
Inspectors:,.J. H.
t
,
e.k.
d 2 /ft
.
"
/.
i
.'
[/
Approved By:
ittle, Chief
.
/
/
Projec(s Section 2 Inspection-Summary Inspection on December 1 th-ough 31, 1980 (Report No. 50-341/80-23)
Areas Inspected: Routine resident inspector, pre-operational inspection consisting of licensee action on previous inspection findings, IE Bulletin and Circular followup, licensee event followup and plant tours. The inspection involved a total of 84 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC inspectors including 12 inspector-hours onsite during off shifts.
Results: No items of noncomp1.iance or deviations were identified.
t
-
.
,
I L
f
- 810A0so(p 0^
.
.
.
..
-.
.
.
,
.
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted T. Alessi, Director Project QA H. Arora, Acting Startup Engineer
- W. Everett, Project Superintendent W. Fahrner, Manager, Fermi 2 Project J. Gessner, Assistant Project QA Director
.
- J. Nyquist, Acting Assistant Plant Superintendent S. Noetzel, Assistant Project Manager H. Walker, Project QA Section Supervisor
- W. White, Plant Superintendent
- Denotes those attending weekly management meeting.
2.
_ Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings W
(Closed) Unresolved item (341/80-10-01) (10 CFR Part 21-80-000) and resulting 10 CFR 50.55(e) " Containment Gas Monitoring System" reports.
The inspector verified that the modification kit and associated documentation committed to by Comsip, Inc. have been received by the licensee. Edison Engineering has completed review of the Vendor proposed modification and has issued a Field Modification Request.
The modification is currently scheduled.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
. 3.
-IE Bulletin and' Circular Followup IE Bulletin 80-25 was issued during this period and requires licensee-action. The inspector verified this Bulletin has been received and
~
undergoing licensee review. Followup and close out of this item will be documented in a' subsequent inspection report.
. No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
4..
Licensee Event Followup
. During December,- Level I cable pulling operation-by a site contractor was temporarily suspended by Project Quality Assurance. This action was taken to permit licensee review of ' areas of concern expressed
~
by a management evaluation group of the Edison Auditing Department.
' Project QA removed the stop work directive aftqr a QA review determined that the site contractor's practices and procedures were acceptable..The licensee is performing a detailed inspection of all areas of concern expressed by.'the evaluation group.
,
.
>
-2-
.
-
~
,
,.
.-
-.,f-.
.
-
-~,w
..
.
.
.
Followup and close out of'this matter will be documented in a subsequent inspection report. This matter is assigned open item number 341-80-23-01.
t No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
5.
-Plant Tours The inspector conducted tours of the reactor, au;iliary and turbine
- buildings. The-inspector observed shif t turnove.s, reviewed plant operations status including control room logs.
The inspector noted' uncapped Level I small bore piping and unsupported compressed gas bottles. These items were brought to the attention of
- the licensee and have been corrected.
.
No-items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6..
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1)
weekly and at the conclusion of the inspection period. The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection findings.
.
n N
e
.
..
. -
e ?
'
3--
-
.
.
5 -
fa.,
s hr1 - - ' '.1. )
m