IR 05000341/1980010
| ML19347B519 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1980 |
| From: | Little B, Little W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347B518 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-80-10, NUDOCS 8010150235 | |
| Download: ML19347B519 (4) | |
Text
-
_ _. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O
,
!-
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
'
REGION III
i
'
Report No. 50/341/80-10
'
Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company
,
2000 Second Avenue l
Detroit, MI 48226
Facility Name: Enrico Fe.mi Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2 f
Inspection At: Fermi Site, Monroe, MI i
Inspection Conducted: June 5 - July 31,1980 i
jlD l X)Vf
-
LD gN[//[/
l Inspector:
H.w-ittle
.
,
<
<
-
,
t.
o-wy Approved By:
- fi f
,M '/
)
ProIects'Section2
//'~
,
i Inspection Summary
!
i Inspection on June 5 - July 31, 1980 (Report No. 50-341/80-10)
Areas Inspected: Routine, resideat inspector, preoperational inspection i
consisting of a review of licensee action on previous inspection findings, review of IE Bulletin and IE Circular followup, Part 21 and 50.55 (e)
i item followup, Preoperation Testing Quality Assurance Program and Plant Tours. The inspection involved a total of 58 inspector-hours onsite by
one NRC inspector including 14 inspector-hours onsite during off-shifts.
'
Results: No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
)
,
\\
.
!
l
!
?
!,
b I
l l
r I
8010150 M
i
- -
.
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
,
.
N J
d DETAILS
-
,
1.
Persons Contacted T. A. Alessi, Project QA Director W. Fahrner, Manager Fermi 2 Project
- R. Lenart, Assistant Plant Superintendent l
E. Neuton, Plant QA Engine.er T. Nickleson, Startup Engineer (Acting)
A. Orlando, QA Supervisor Engineering and Operations H. Walker, QA Section Supervisor
j
- W. White, Plant Superintendent
- Denotes those attending monthly exit meeting.
J
2.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings
<
l i
(0 pen) Unresolved Item (341/79-23-01):
Personnel Qualification.
'
The startup engineer will assure that the qualifications of plaut j
instrument and control personnel conform to ANSI N18.1 prior to preoperational testing.
(0 pen) Unresolved item (341/80-03-01):
Preventative maintenance program during preoperational testing. The program is currently
,
being developed.
,
!
'
'
3.
IE Bulletin and Circular Followup l
The inspector verified that IE Bulletins requiring licensee action which have been issued during this report period have been received
,
j by the licensee.
Bulletins in this category are: IE Bulletin 80-16, l
IE Bulletin 80-19, IE Bulletin 80-20.
Followup and close out of j
licensee's action on these matters will be documented in subsequent j
resident monthly inspection report (s).
j i
i j
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
)
4 4.
10 CFR Part 21 (80-210-000) Followup Detroit Edison received notification from Comsip, Inc., the supplier of the Fermi 2 Containment Gas Monitoring System, that they had
,
j reported problems to NRC Region V under 10 CFR 21 requirements.
It was reported that a pump malfunction during a test at Comsip on a i
similar system had created excessive pressure which cot'd conceivably j
rupture the diaphram, and breach the containment integt.ty of the j
system.
The correspondence from Comsip, Inc. stated that a kit will be made
,
'
available to add a by pass on the discharge of the pump to prevent
-2-
!
_.
-..
.. _,
_ -
_. _
,
_.
. =... _ _
.
.
A deadheading, which will eliminate excessive pressure and the possi-bility of this type of failure or damage. This kit and associated documentation have been requested by Detroit Edison.
In addition,
,
the licensee has issued a 10 CFR 50.55(e) interim report of this
,
item.
,
j The inspector verified the licetsee's receipt of notification by
Comsip, Inc., reviewed correspondence and submitted a Part 21 data sheet. Followup and close out of 10 CFR Part 21 (80-210-000) and resulting 10 CFR 50.55(e) item will be documented in subsequent
,
resident monthly inspection report (s). This matter is assigned Open Item Number (341/80-10-01).
i
!
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
]
5.
Control and Storage of Electrical Measuring and Test Equipment An internal performance reviem was performed by the Startup Organiza-
'
tion on March 28, 1980, to determine the degree of compliance with
',
the requirements of the Startup Manual Appendix 4.2, " Control and Storage of Electrical Group Measuring and Test Equipment." A 10 CFR 50.55(e) report was submitted to NRC.
Based upon the deficiencies
found, all electrical testing of QA Level I equipment was suspended effective March 28, 1980.
Subsequent action by the licensee to correct these deficiencies include; procedure revisions, training of startup technicians to requirements of the Checkout and Initial Operations procedures and
'
contracting outside calibration facilities for calibration of test
'
equipment.
The above suspension was lifted on July 21, 1980. The inspector has I
discussed with licensee key QA personnel deficiencies noted and actions taken by licensee. Review of this matter has not been completed, and is assigned Open Item Number (341-80-10-02).
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
6.
Preoperational Testing Quality Assurance Program
'
The inspectors met with licensee key QA personnel to discuss QA responsibilities and QA program status. The Plant Quality Assurance Organization has QA responsibilities beginning with the start of preoperational testing and continuing throughout plant life.
The Plant Quality Assurance Manual, Audit Program and Supporting Quality Assurance procedures, shich are to be applied during preoper-ational testing, are presently in varicus stages of development. The Plant QA Manual policy section has been drafted and is undergoing management review. The Operational QA Program procedures are being developed by the Apollo Division of General Electric. Approximately-3-
.
-,. -.
,
. _ -
.,__
-. _ -.
_
- __,
_
. _ _ _,
-
.
-
-
..
-
i
-
l
20% of these procedures have been drafted, none have been approved.
The Plant QA implementing procedures are being prepared by the Plant QA group. Approximately 50% of these procedures have been drafted with 10% approved and issued.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
7.
Plant Tours
The inspector conducted walkthroughs and reviewed the plant oper-ations status including examinations of control room log books, and active red tag file.
The inspector observed shif t turnovers to verify that plant com-ponent status and problem areas were being turned over to a re-lieving shift.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
,
8.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection period. The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection findings.
,
I l
l
)
I t
!
!
4-
-
1
-.,,. - -..
..
-
.-. -.,-.
.
.. - __
_ _-,..-__
... -
.. - - -
i