IR 05000341/1980004
| ML19309G190 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1980 |
| From: | Barrett P, Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309G188 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-80-04, 50-341-80-4, NUDOCS 8005050108 | |
| Download: ML19309G190 (4) | |
Text
. _ _.
- 005050
/Qg
,
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCMENT
REGION III
~
Report No. 50-341/80-04 Docket No. 50-341 License No. CPPR-87 Licensee: Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, MI 48266 Facility Name: Enrico Fermi Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Inspection At: Fermi Site, Monroe, MI Inspection Conducted: February 19-22, 1980 d@
Inspector:
P. A. Barrett'
3"/3-60 R.'C. Knop, Chief,Q
.-7-/J-@
t/u
'
Approved By:
Projects Section 1
-
Inspection Summary Inspection on Feb uary 19-22, 1980 (Report No. 50-341/80-04)
Areas Inspected: Follow-up of previously identified unresolved item and review construction organizations and status. The inspection involved 23 inspector-hours onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results: No items of noncompliance were identified,
.
_ -__
.
f DETAILS Persons Contacted Detroit Edison Company
,
T. Alessi, QA Director R. Barr, Project QA Director W. Everett, Project Superintendent
- A. Walker, Site Project QA Engineer W. A. Fahrner, Project Manager
- J.
A. Cartmill, Assistant Project Superintendent
- S.
H. Noetzel, Director Field Engineering Daniel International Corporation
- M.
Albertin, Assistant Program Manager
- D.
L. Vandergrift, Electrical QC Engineering
- Denotes those attending the exit interview.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Open) Unresolved Item (341/79-17-02): Design documents which have had numerous unincorporated design changes listed. Reference IE Report No. 80-01.
During this inspection the RIII inspector had extensive discussions with the licensee concerning the identified design change control problems. The nucleus of the problems apparently is incorrect and inadequate input into the Automatic Records Management System, ARMS.
ARMS is a continu-us computer display system which, in part, is used to identify the current status of design documents including changes. The ARMS has been used to control document distribution and updating since mid-1977. Though most of the problems affect documents prior to 1977, inadequate and incorrect input into ARMS has continued through 1979.
Approximately 10,000 design changes have been written to date including j
the approximate 3000 prior to the ARMS. Licensee audits and surveil
,
lances indicate that the problems affect engineering and essentially all site contractors and subcontractors.
The licensee has set a high priority on resolving all of the identified design document problems. An Engineering Assurance group has been es-tablished and specific directions have been issued at the site to resolve the problems.
To date, the corrective efforts have been concentrated on drawings and applicable changes.
The types of problems that have been identified are:
(1) distrust by the personnel using the ARMS.
-2-
_
_ _____
O f
(2) drawing revisions and changes inadequately distributed.
(3) design changes referenced against incorrect drawings.
The problems were identified by audits and surveillances which included drawings with seven or more changes outstanding.
_
The licensee stated that the ARMS problems, relating to drawings, would be resolved by April 30, 1980.
Immediately thereafter, a 100% review of all drawings at all locations will be made to assure that all revisions and design changes are current.
The same kind of a program will be implemented by the licensee for all other controlled documents (e.g. specifications, instructions, standards, etc.) and should be completed by June 30, 1980.
Phase III of the audit program described in IE Report No. 80-01 will not be performed.
Instead, the licensee has issued a directive (F2S80-147 dated February 12, 1980) to all contractors performing safety related activities. The directive requires that all inspection records must reflect the configuration of the design documents, used in the inspec-tions and that this requirement must be incorporated into the contrac-tors procedures. The licensee stated that current records will be made to comply with this requirement first, followed by future and past records, respectively.
The licensee stated that further degradation of systems will not occur by continuing to perform activities which are influenced by the ARMS and which are not readily restorable (e.g. welding, core boring, etc.)
The current procedural requirements for these activities will prevent such degradation.
Functional or Program Areas Inspected 1.
Construction Status a.
The RIII inspector took thorough tours of the Reactor Building (including the torus), Auxiliary Building, Residual Heat Removal Building, the Wismer & Becker warehouse and laydown areas, and the Daniel warehouses.
b.
The RIII inspector reviewed and discussed the torus modification activities and the past concern (closed November 8, 1974) of the Reactor Building subbasement base slab cracks.
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
.
-3-
- ~
l
.
O 2.
Site Organization The RIII inspector reviewed and discussed the new site organization which will restructure many of the Detroit Edison and Daniel Inter-national QA/QC personnel responsibilities, duties, authorities, and reporting requirements.
..
To date, only the organization chart and preparation to relocate personnel have been completed.
Individual personnel job descrip-tions have not yet been established. These descriptions will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
(341/80-04-01)
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.
Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives on February 22, 1980.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The licensee acknowledged the findings as reported.
~
4
- 4-I