IR 05000302/1995022

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Violations of Procedures Re Makeup Tank Pressure at Plant.Submits Excerpts from Draft Insp Rept 50-302/95-22
ML20203B813
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/1996
From: Gibson A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Mcnulty W
NRC OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS (OI)
Shared Package
ML20203B366 List:
References
FOIA-97-313 50-302-95-22, NUDOCS 9712150158
Download: ML20203B813 (1)


Text

g

,

_

,

-

- _.-

/ja maeug*o'

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITEo STATES p

REolON ll

--

S 101 MARIETTA STREET, N.W., SUITE 2900 o

D j

ATLANTA. oEoRGIA 303210190

%,u..+/

January 16, 1996 n*

\\ \\

'

i MEMORANDUM T0:

William J. McNulty, Director i\\} d J

Office of Investigations f

FROM:

Albert F. Gibson, Director f

)

Division of Reactor Safety 7 SUBJECT:

VIOLATIONS OF PROCEDURES CONCERNING MAKEUP TANK PRESSURE AT CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Our inspection, conducted December 11-15, 1995, has determined that operators apparently violated procedures on September 4,1994.

Excerpts from draft inspection Report 50-302/95-22 are included below.

On September 4,1994, Operators did not follow OP-402 instructions for adding hydrogen by manually bypassing the 15 psig hydrogen regulator. The applicable step in OP< 102 specifically required " ensuring MUT pressure limit is not exceeded." However, operators exceeded the Curve 8 MUT pressure limit during hydrogen addition. Operators also exceeded the administrative limits of OP-103B, Curve 8, for an extended period of time (about 43 minutes).

In addition, during this evolution, operators did not take timely action in response to the " MAKEUP TANK PRESS HIGH" annunciator.

Instead of reducing pressure to clear the alarm as required, operators reduced level (and pressure) which caured the Curve 8 limits to be exceeded by an increasing amount. Operators left the alarm in for about 43 minutes before venting the make-up tank to clear the alarm.

This is an example of apparent violation 50-302/95-13-01.

i l

i

!

\\

l

'

B(HlBlI fY 2-9 4 -0 3 6E PAGE

/

OF l

PAGE(S)

g' ? [' /[>

0 /I

!

9712150138 971203

/

PDR FOLA LIAW97-313 PDR

'

.

- -

- - -

- - -

-

-

.