ML20203B983

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Crystal River 3 Apparent Violation.Result of Panel Was to Schedule Predecisional Enforcement Conferences W/Operators to Assure All Aspects of Apparent Violation Where Known
ML20203B983
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/1995
From: Merschoff E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Curtis Rapp
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20203B366 List:
References
FOIA-97-313 NUDOCS 9712150200
Download: ML20203B983 (3)
v • d • e


Text

- _ _ -__ _ __- _________ -____-_______ _ - - _._.__ . .. .

i e

o umTro sTAtts

/ps e.c ,% NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMCSION  ;

S.-

33%

REGloN 11 T; '

I DP j' 101 MARitTTA STREET. N.W. sulTE l200 ATLANTA GloRGIA 321:34199

\-*.... / .

Augus+, 9, 1995 j MEMORANDUM 10: Curtis W. Rapp "

Reactor Inspector .

Division of Reactor Safety '

FROM: Ellis W. Herschoff, Director Division of Reactor Projects  !

SUBJECT:

CRYSTAL RIVER 3 APPARENT VIOLATION  ;

. I was surprised to receive your memo of July 27, 1995, stating that you had been

. excluded from discussions which led to the proposal of apparent violations for the Crystal River operators. The decision that sufficient basis existed to r warrant a predecisional enforcement conference for each of the operators was- ',

made, in accordance with agency policy, at an enforcement panel on June 14, 1995. i Since you were out of the office that day, we arranged td include you on that '

enforcement panel by telephone and, as I recall, you participated fully in the '.

discussions.

The result of the panel was to schedule predecisional enforcement conferences with the operators to assure all aspects of tha apparent violation where known.

Your presence at the post panels for the predecisional enforcement conferences was planned and expected. As you know, additional information was received which has resulted in reopening of the investigation into this matter and postponment  ;

of the predecisional enforcement conferences.

Your letter will be included in the enforcement record for this matter, and you are expected to assure your schedule will support your personal participation in the resolution of these enforcement issues, it is important to me that your knowledge of this case and the issues at hand be fully explored during the decigion making process of this case. Consequently, if you have any new or additional information that should be considered or was not fully considered as part of the process to date, please provide it to either me or Mr. Gibson as soon as possible.

If'you have any questions, I would be happy to discuss' them with you.

o cc: 5. Ebneter L. peyes A. Gibson  :

9 e

t t.

f 9712150200 971203 ATTACHMENT 8

. - - PDR FOIA 1 PDR  ;

h s-'LIAW97-313- ' ~ ~r - -- - - -, - - _ - _ - _ -_

5 Augun 9,1995 L

i i

HEMORANDUM TO: Curtis W..Rapp Reactor Inspector ,

Division of Reactor Saft:ty FROM: Ellis W. Herschoff, Director -

Division of Reactor Projects

SUBJECT:

CRYSTAL RIVER 3 APPARENT _ VIOLATION  ;

1 was-surprised to receive your memo of July 27, 1995, stating that you had been '

- excluded from discus tons which led to the proposal of apparent violations for the Crystal River operators. The decision that sufficient basis existed to 4 1 arrant a predecisional enforcement conference for each of the operators was made, in accordance with agency policy, at an enforcement panel on June 14, 1995. '

Since you were out of the office that day,' we arranged to include you on that enforcement pan'el by telephone and, as I recall, you participated fully in the discussions. 4 The result of the panel was to schedule predecisional enforcement conferences with the operators to assure all aspects of the apparent violation where known.

- Your prasence at the post panels for the predecisional enforcement conferences was planned and expected. As you know, additional information was received which has resulted in reopening of the investigation into this matter and postponment of the predecisional enforcement conferences.

Your letter will be included in the enforcement record for this matter, and you are expected to assure your schedule will support your personal participation in the resolution of. these _ enforcement issues. It is important to me that your knowledge of this case and the issues at hand be fully explored during the decision making process of this case. Consequently, if you have any new or additional information that should be considered or was not fully considered as part, of the process to date, please provide it to either me or Mr. Gibson as soon

  • as possible.

If you have any questions, I would be happy to discuss them with you.

cc: S. Ebneter L. Reyes A. Gibson

  • SEE PREVIOUS-CONCURRENCES - ATTACHED YES NO I l SEND TO PUMtC DOCttufMT A00W OFFICE Ril:DAP
  • Rtt:flCS 'Rit:DRS StGNATURf EM(RSCHOFF BURYC AGiBSON NAuf 08f 195 08 1 195 08 i /95 DATE ' 08't - /95 081 /95 08 i /95 NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO COPY) YES - NO YES o m ctn etcomo coPT ooomtwT uaE P:\ MEMOS \RAPP.EWM i

__ _ __.~. _ _ _

-- ~ ..-. _ -. - - . . . - . . .

l l

= MEMORANDUM TO:- Curtis W. Rapp ,

Reactor Inspector Division of Reactor Safety FROM: Ellis W. Herschoff, Director f Division of Reactor Projects l

SUBJECT:

CRYSTAL RIVER 3 APPARENT VIOLAT N  !

i I was surprised.to receive your memo of July ,1995, stating that you had been excluded from discussions which led to theproposal of apparent violations for -

the Crystal River operators. . The decision that sufficient basis existed to warrant a predecisional enforcement conference for each of the operators was  !

made, in accordance with agency policy,/t an enforcement panel on June 14, 1995.

Since you were out of the office that' day, we arranged to include veu on that i enforcement panel by' telephone and, as I recall, you participated fully in the '

discussions. ,

The result of the panel was to schedule predecisional enforcement conferences with the operators to assure aspects of the apparent violation where known. l

- Your presence at the post pa els for the predecisional enforcement conferences was planned and expected. you know, additional information was received which has resulted in reopening f the investigation into this matter and postponment of the predecisional enf rcement conferences.

Your letter will be i cluded in the enforcement record for this matter, and you ,

are expected to assuye your schedule will support your personal participation in the resolution of hese enforcement issues. It is important to me that your knowledge of thi case and the issues at hand be fully explored during the -

decision making rocess of this case.

if you have y questions, I would be happy to discuss them with you.

cc: S. bneter I

. Reyes '

. Gibson .

I me to .wuc coetwmr mow vrs no l OFT 1CE Rit:DRP Rit:<p*S Rit:DRS siowATuar unut turnscworr

[

acission \ -

east cas ios onOlies osis s es oe s ins oei ins oa r s es com vis wo Fth no fesl wo vts no ves no ves - wo otticin accoso cort becuitar wie: T'.\ MEMOS \RAPP.EWM 4

~ _==

,yy,w,g-.- y+rv-y '-y-ey--.E.---y.-_-epy- g y g--gyn,4 gy- g-, .--

p  ;,n y,,,_m eM.v.---esa --

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203B983&oldid=3332641"