IR 05000302/1982001
| ML20040G897 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1982 |
| From: | Skinner P, Upright C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040G895 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-302-82-01, 50-302-82-1, IEB-79-10, NUDOCS 8202160593 | |
| Download: ML20040G897 (8) | |
Text
,
- _
_-- --_
.
.
.f " %
,
V UNITED STATES
a d
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
o-REGION 11 E
".
'l 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SulTE 3100 ATLANTA, GEORo tA 30303 i
.....
Re_po'rt No. 50-302/81-01 Licensee:
Florida Power Corporation P.'O.. Box 14042, Mail Stop C-4 St. Petersburg, FL 33733 Facility Name:
Crystal River Docket No.- 50-302 -
' License No. DPR-72 Inspection at Crystal River site near Crystal River, Florida Inspector: [If
//
/ 22 8L P. ~H.- Skinner g
fateKigned
~
Approved by: //8
[
2[67 C"M. Opfight, Se/ ion GMef
/
/
Engineering Ins tion Tranch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division SUMMARY Inspection on January 4-8, 1982
,
Areas Inspected t
This routine, unannounced inspection involved 36 inspector-hours on site in the areas of requalification training of licensed operators, procedures, surveillance and calibration control program, maintenance program, and licensee action on previously identified inspection items.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified.
,
r
%
Pa*ie8Eh*M$a O
a
__
_ ___ _ - _ ___ __ ____ ___ ___ _
.
.
-
.
REPORT DETAILS
1.
' Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- G. Boldt, Technical Services Superintendent
'D. Breedlove, Document Control Supervisor D. Brock, Nuclear Maintenance Specialist C. Brown, Compliance Supervisor
' M. Collins, Performance Engineering Supervisor
- J. Cooper, Jr., NQA/QC Manager B. Crane, Nuclear Training Manager-
- J. Cuneo, Technical Training Supervisor D. Farless, I&C Supervisor C. Gaines, Instructor (operator)
- W. Herbert, Muclear Technical Specification Coordinator.
- S. Johnson, II,- Technical Support Engineer
- L.- Kelley, Maintenance Specialist
- B. Komara, Compliance Auditor -
R.' Matthews, Chief, Instrument Shop D; Poole, Nuclear Plant Manager S. Primo, ISI Engineer R. Rogers, Nuclear Plant Stores Supervisor P. ' Taylor, Procedures Specialist
- E. Welch, Computer. and Controls Specialist G. Williams, Nuclear QA/0C Supervisor F. Wreath, Consultant
'Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, and office personnel.
NRC Resident Inspector -
T. Stetka, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized-on January 8,1981 with
- those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The licensee acknowledged the inspector findings.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters a.
(Closed) Infraction (302/78-06-01):
Failure To ' Review, Revise and -
Control Several Procedures As Required by AI-400, Plant Operating Quality Assurance Manual Control Document. Corrective action as
_
b
_ _ _.
- - - - - -
_ _
.
.
-
.
-
l described in licensees correspondence dated April 18,.1978 has been-verified.
b.
(Closed) Infraction (302/79-55-01):
Failure To Follow Establish'ed.
- Housekeeping Requirements. ' Corrective ' action as described in licen -
see's correspondence dated April 17, 1980 has been verified. Discus-sions with the Resident Inspector indicated that adequate cleanliness levels are being maintained, c.
'(Clossd) Infraction. (302/80-03-01):
Failure.To Perform Required-Surveillance on Incore Neutron Detectors Within Required 18-Month Period.
This item was discussed in licensee correspondence dated February 21,1980, _in which the item was submitted as LER 50/302/
80-005/032-0.
This LER was closed out in Inspection Report 50-302/
80-32 dated October 30, 1980.
d.
(Closed) -Infraction (302/80-07-01):
Failure To Adequately Store Stainless -Steel Piping To Prevent ~ Contact With Carbon Steel Storage Rack.
Corrective action as described in licensee's correspondence.
dated March 7,1980 has been verified, e.
-(Closed) Infraction (302/80-30-02):
Failure To Follow AI-1000, Good Housekeeping ' Procedure To ' Initiate Corrective l Actions For Identified.
Discrepancies.
Corrective action as described in licensee's corre-spondence dated October 3,1980 has been verified.
f.
(Closed) Deficiency (302/79-41-04):
Failure To Maintain Quality Record-Keeping and Review - Criteria for Data and Calculation Sheets Which'Are Portions of Procedures.
Corrective action as described in licensee correspondence dated November 14, 1979 has been verified, g.
(Closed) Violation (302/81-18-02):
Failure to Properly Store Quality.
Related Records.
Corrective action as described in licensee corre-spondence dated October 20, 1981 has been verified.
h.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (302/80-14-02): Failure to Provide Adequate Guidance in Surveillance Procedures to Ensure Corrective Action When Required.
As a result of this item, surveillance procedures were.
reviewed to assure that required corrective action was identified.
Various procedures were revised to incorporate required changes. A review of various surveillance procedures indicates that required corrective actions have been identified.
.1.
(Closed) Unresolved Item (302/81-18-04):
Lack of Documentation of
_
Training and Retraining.
Documentation is available on training and'
retraining of all plant personnel. This documentation is being stored on microfiche for all plant operating personnel. In addition,'a system has been established to track 'on-the-job training of maintenance personnel'on a computer storage ' system.
~
.
~_"
.e
.. _.
_ - _.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ _
_ _ __ _ __
.
-
.
.
-3 4.
Unresolved Items
,
.
Unresolved i* ems were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Requalification Training (41701)
References:
(a) ANSI N18.1-1971, Selection and Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel (b)
10CFR55 Appendix A, Requalification Programs for-Licensed Operators of Production and Utilization Facilities i
(c) -AI-1400, Conduct of Training, Revision 6 (d) TOP-203, Licensed Operator Requalification Training
~ Program, Revision 0
,
'
Implementation of the accepted requalification training program was reviewed to verify that the licensee has prepared a schedule for conducting lectures and has prepared -lesson plans or equivalent for training lectures presented.
The inspector reviewed the records of training conducted in 1981, copies of annual written examinations on the individual's response,; documentation of attendance at required lectures,. documentation of required control manipu-
'lations, documentation of completion of required-procedure reviews, and the
,
records of three licensed operators. Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
6.
Procedures (42700)
References:
(a) AI-400, Plant Operating. Quality Assurance Manual Control
'
Document, Revision 42 (b) 0SIM,Section III, Shift Operations, Revision 0 (c) AI-300, Plant Review Committee Charter, Revision 17 (d) Reg Guide 1.33, Quality Assurance Program (e) AI-600, Conduct of Maintenance, Revision 16 The inspector conducted.a review of selected plant procedures in accordance-with guidance and requirements provided in references (a) through (e) above to ascertain whether overall procedures are in accordance with regulatory requirements. The following criteria were used during this review:
- '
Required review and approval of procedures and temporary changes had been performed
{
-
Overall procedure content.is consistent with reference (d).
i i-i
-
..
. ", _ _
...
m.
J
..
-.
.
-
4-
' Records of changes-in ~ procedures are being maintained
-.
.
-
Safety reviews pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59 were pc-rformed
-
The training department was appraised of changes to procedures
-
Administrative procedures were followed in the preparation and handling-of procedures Based on this review, no violations.or deviations were identified.
7.
. Surveillance and Calibration Control Program (61725)
. References:
(a) AI-700, Conduct of Technical Services, Revision 19 (b) AI-400, Plant Operating Quality Assu'rance Manual Control Document, Revision 42
(c) SP-443, Master Surveillance Plan, Revision 48 (d) SP-440, Unit Startup Surveillance Plan, Revision 34
(e) SP-441, Unit Shutdown Surveillance Plan, Revision 22 l
( f) SP-169, Plant Safety-Related Instrument Calibration,
'
Revision 3 (g) SP-370, Quarterly Cycling of Valves, Revision 21-The inspector reviewed. administrative controls and procedures contained in the references listed for surveillance testing to ascertain that the licensee has developed programs for control and evaluaticn of surveillance
,
l testing as required by. technical specifications and Regulatory Guide 1.33 as
!
endorsed by the accepted QA Program. The following criteria were verified during this review:
Formal-methods and responsibilities have been defined for. review and
-
evaluation of surveillance test / calibration data' including procedure
'-
for reporting deficiencies, failures, malfunctions, etc., identified-
!
l during the tests / calibrations or inspections with required verification that Limiting Conditions for Operation were satisified
--
Responsibility has been assigned for assuring that required schedules for all tests and inspections are satisfied -
F
-
Calibration-requirements have been established for components associ-
~
ated with safety related systems or functions but which are not speci-fled in the technical specifications as requiring calibration
-
Responsibility has been assigned in writing to maintain the master calibration. schedule up-to-date J
-
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -.
..
.
-
.
-
Formal requirements have been established for performing component calibrations in accordance with approved procedures which include acceptance criteria
-
Responsibility for assuring that required component calibration schedules are sa isfied.
Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.
8.
Maintenance Program (62702)
References:
(a)
FSAR Section 1.7, Quality Program (b) AI-600, Conduct of Maintenance, Revision 16 (c) QC-1700, Review and Control of Quality Work Documenta-tion, Revision 1 (d) CP-107, Test Equipment, Standards, and Calibration Control, Revision 12 (e) CP-113, Procedures for Handling and Controlling Work Requests, Revision 27 (f) CP-116, Standard Cleaning Specifications, Revision 3 (g) OSIM Section III, Shif t Operators, Revision 0 t
(h) MP-601, On-the-job Training of Maintenance Shop Personnel, Revision 1 The inspector reviewed the maintenance program in accordance with the reference listed to ascertain whether the activities met the requirements of ANSI N18.7-1972 as endorsed by reference (a). The following criteria were used during this review:
-
Written procedures were established for initiating requests for routine and emergency maintenance
-
Criteria and responsibilities for review and approval of maintenance requests were established Criteria and responsibilities that form the basis for designating the
-
activity as safety-or non-safety-related were established Criteria and responsibilities were designed for performing work
-
inspection and maintenance activities
-
Provisions and responsibilities were established for identification of appropriate inspection hold points related to maintenance activities J
,
-
_
..,.
..
.
.
.
~
-
Methods and responsibilities were designated for performing functional.
testing of_ structures,.. systems, or components. following maintenance-work and/or prior to theic.being retu_rned to service -
-
A written preventive maintenance program for safety-related structures, systems, and components has been established Administrative controls for special processes have been established -
-
-
Method and responsibilities for equipment control have been defined A corrective maintenance program has been established that-includes
-
written procedures, responsibilities for review and approval of work requests, inspection of work, holdpoint implementation, and administra-tive controls.
Based on this review, the inspector identified a concern that an approved system of trend analysis for maintenance activities is not presently avail-able. A rough draft of a computerized program has been written and par-tially implemented.
It appears that this program will be an outstanding tool for evaluation of problems and potential problems. Since similar areas-have been addressed by Inspection Report items-80-23-09 and 81-02-14, the Resident Inspectors will review this concern as part of their resolution of these items.
9.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Inspection Items (92701)
a.
(Closed) Inspector. Followup Item (302/80-06-01):
Failure to Provide Approved -Procedures for Calibration of Test Equipment. The inspecto'r reviewed selected procedures for calibration of ' test equipment.
Procedures were provided for test instruments as required.
'
b.
(Closed) Inspector Fellowup Item (302/80-06-02):
Failure to ' Provide-Personnel _ With Training.
The inspector reviewed TDP 310, Nuclear
'
Technical Support Technician Training. Program, (draft) which describes a training program for plant technicians.
Based on a review. of
training records for two calibration. technicians, 'no problems were identified.
c.
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item (302/80-06-04):
Lack of Procedures for Testing Various Containment Isolation Valves. Procedures exist to test all containment isolation valves.
"
d.
(Closed)-Inspector Followup Item (302/81-07-09): ' Revision of Surveil-lance Test Procedures to Include Step Completion Signoffs for Equipment Return to Service. ~ A review of surveillance test procedures indicate that' revisions have been incorporated.in procedures to add signoffs to steps when returning equipment to service.
.
F
. '. -
..
~
-
..
e.
(Close) Inspector Followup Item (302/81-18-03):
Expiration of Certi-fication of Quality Control Inspectors.
~A review of quality control inspectors indicates that all inspectors have received annual recer-tifications.
f.
(Close) Open Item -(302/79-23-08, 79-BU-10):
Submittal Of Revised Response to Bulletin 79-10.
A revised response was submitted by licensee correspondence dated June 26, 1979.
.
..