IR 05000245/1987020
| ML20235U735 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 10/02/1987 |
| From: | Davidson B, Pasciak W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235U727 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-245-87-20, 50-336-87-18, NUDOCS 8710140226 | |
| Download: ML20235U735 (4) | |
Text
_. _ _ _ - -. _ _ _ _ _ - _ -
- _ -
-. -_.
_ _ - -
- _ _ -
_ - _ -
..
-. - _ - _.
~
i
.' ' ]
'
>
,
p U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
'
'
~ Report Nos.. 50-245/87-20-
-50-336/87-18 Docket Nos.
50-245 and 50-336 J
'
Category C
License Nos.
--
Licensee: Northeast Nuclear Energy Company P. O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Facility.Name:~ Millstone Nuclear Generating Station, Units One and Two
'
Inspection At: Waterford, Connecticut Inspection Conducted: August 24-28, 1987 Inspectors:
//v[
'
/d!o2/ff Ara Barry S.
idron, Radiation pifedialist
'date
/#/d //-7 Approvedb[:
6t::7A
'
Walter d.f gscias, Chief, Effluents
/date P
Radiatiffn Protection Section, DRSS s
Inspection Summary:
Inspection on August 24-28,1987 (Combined Inspection
-
Report Nos. 50-245/87-20 and 50-336/87-18 Areas Inspected: Routine unannounced inspection of the licensee's radioactive l
effluents control program, liquids and liquid wastes, gaseous waste system,
't process radiation monitoring system, air cleaning systems, and audit l
activities.
Results:
No violations or deviations were noted.
l
<
8710140226 371007!2j5 DR ADOCK O i
j L____-1_:_____-_._.
___
k
-_-__ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._. __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
DETAILS 1.0 Personnel Contacted Licensee
- J. Wates, Chemistry Supervisor
- J. Stetz, Unit One Superintendent
- H. Haynes, Station Services Superintendent
- F. Dacino, Unit Two Engineering Supervisor G. D' Auria, Analytical Chemist T. Itteilag, Unit Two Asst. Chemistry Supervisor J. Kelly, Unit One Chemistry Specialist I. Olshefsky, Unit One I & C D. Kross, Unit Two I & C N. Bergh, Unit One Operations Assistant J. Heg, Unit Two Operations Assistant
- Attended the exit interview on August 28, 1987 2.0 Action on Previously Identified Findings 2.1 (Closed) Inspector Follow-Up Item (50-245/86-08-01; 50-336/86-08-01)
Audits of changes to Technical Specifications regarding effluents had not been completed.
The inspector reviewed an audit of this area conducted in 1986.
Major portions were completed.
This item is closed.
2.2 (Closed) Inspector Follow-Up Item (50-245/86-08-02; 50-336/86-08-02).
Review revisions to procedures for periodic surveillance tests to be performed.
Procedures ACP-QA-9.02 A and ACP-QA-9.02 B were reviewed by the inspector and found satisfactory.
This item is closed.
2.3 (Closed) Inspector Follow-Up Item (50-245/86-08-04).
Personnel at Unit One were not aware of calibration procedure and method for the steam jet air ejector radiation monitor.
The inspector interviewed Unit One Chemistry personnel and found them knowledgeable of the calibration methodology. This item is closed.
2.4 (Closed) Inspector Follow-Up Item (50-245/86-11-01; 50-336/86-11-01)
Addition of Fe-55 and intercomparing all counting geometries routinely used in the laboratory.
The inspector reviewed chemistry procedures and results of analyses and found that Fe-55 was added and geometries other than liquid being implemented.
The inspector noted that although the procedure specifies a frequency of intercomparisons semiannually, the licensee was performing them on a monthly basis.
__ _
. _ _
_ _
_ _ _ _ _
_ _.
- - _ -
-
- _ _ _
-
_ _ _ _ -
t
's.1
.
s L
L 3.0 Chemistry The organizational structure in the chemistry. department _is. divided into groups with responsibilities for each facility. The Chemistry Supervisor has the.overall responsibility and authority for the program. Assistant Chemistry Supervisors oversee the day to day activities for each unit and for program implementation.
The licensee's radiochemistry program was reviewed through discussions with~ chemistry personnel, review of applicable procedures and radioactive effluent release data and permits.
Procedures were established and implemented for liquid and gaseous wastes and reactor coolant as required by Technical Specifications. - Surveillance requirements are established in administrative. procedures.ACP-QA-9.02 A and ACP-QA-9.02 B for Units One_and Two respectively.
The inspector reviewed release information and performed a spot check on the calculated doses as a verification, using the equations in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM).
The ODCM was well stated and provided details and bases for the calculation methodology.
With regard to vendor supplied analyses of Sr-89, Sr-90, and Fe-55, the inspector noted that the licensee controls vendor activities through a sample _QA program. The intercomparison QA program has been expanded to utilize all of the typcs of ' geometries routinely employed in radioanalytical measurements and the analyses are conducted monthly.
The procedure stipulates a sample frequency twice a year.
Within the scope of this review, no problems were noted.
4.0 Audits The inspector reviewed audits germane to the radioactive effluents control program and found them comprehensive and technically complete.
The Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) is due to perform an audit of-setpoint methodology and program implementation in the fourth quarter of 1987. The recent audit performed on the Radiological and Environmental Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (REM 0DCM) on behalf of the Nuclear Review Board (NRB), No. A-24001, 10/86, was reviewed by the inspector. The report included several findings which were adequately addressed in a timely manner.
Within the scope of this review, no violations were noted.
5.0 Radiation Monitoring System The inspector reviewed the gaseous and liquid effluent radiation monitoring system with respect to Technical Specification requirements for calibration and functional / channel checks.
The inspector reviewed selected procedures and accompanying records for calibration and
_ _ _ _ _
-
. _ _ _ _
_
..
__
.,
.
,'
.
,
4.
!
I surveillance activities and found them satisfactory.
The inspector toured Unit One'and Two and traced lines from tanks to monitors and I
sampling locations.
L
'
Within'the scope of this review, no violations were.found.
6.0. Testing of Air Cleaning Systems The.'. inspector reviewed the licensee's air filtration. system testing with.
regard to the Technical Specifications' requirements. ' The. inspector noted that-scheduling of surveillance ensured'that.the frequency-
requirements were met.
Unit One Standby Gas Treatment System, Unit Two.
.g Enclosure Building,'and Control Room test records were reviewed and found adequate.
l There'was no concerns in this area.
No violations were found.
!
7.0 ' Exit-Interview-l The. inspector met with licensee representatives denoted in Section 1.0 at the. conclusion of the inspection on August 28,'1987.
The inspector summarized the purpose-and scope of the inspection and the inspection
. findings. At no time during the-inspection were any written materials provided to the licensee.
l
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _
-