IR 05000010/1978034
| ML19294A688 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/1979 |
| From: | Dettenmeier R, Streeter J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19294A684 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-010-78-34, 50-10-78-34, 50-237-78-32, 50-249-78-33, NUDOCS 7903080178 | |
| Download: ML19294A688 (5) | |
Text
.
.
,
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0!D11SSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION III
Report No:
50-010/78-34; 50-237/78-32; 50-249/78-33 Docket No:
50-010; 50-237; 50-249 License No. DPR-02; DPR-19: DPR-25 Licensee:
Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690 Facility Name: Dresden Nuclear Power Station Inspection At: Morris, IL Inspection Conducted: December 20-21, 26-28, 1978
$.1.
/
's
!>
.c,
/j/ / 7/
..
/
Inspector:
R. W. Dettenmeier r
i
"mD 1/,7 / 7e
I Approved By:
J. F. Streeter, Chief Nuclear Support Section 1 Inspection Summary Inspection on December 20-21, 26-28, 1978 (Report No. 50-010/78-34; 50-237/78-32: 50-249/78-33)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of Licensee's Program for Control, Storage, Retention, and Retrieval of Records and Documents, (Units 1, 2, and 3), Licensee's Purchase of Components, Materials and Supplies used for Safety Related Functions, (Units 1, 2, and 3),
Licensee's Plant Procedures, (Units 2 and 3), Review of Safety Limits, Limiting Safety System Settings and Limiting Conditions for Operation and Review of Chemical Cleaning Program (Unit 1).
The inspection involved 36 inspector-hours (Unit 1 - 18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br />, Unit 2 - 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br />, l'r.it 3-9 hours)
onsite by one NRC inspector.
Results:
No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified in the areas inspected.
,
7903 080l ~/<$,
.
a DETAILS
.
1.
Persons Contacted
- B.
Stephenson, Station Superintendent
- B.
Shelton, Administrative Assistant
- R.
Ragan, Senior Operating Engineer G. Redman, Unit 1 Chemical Cleaning Project Manager
- H.
Davy, Storeroom Administrator
- R.
Statert. Quality Assurance Engineer J. Plese. Storekeeper R. Potts Record Retention and Retrieval Administrator G. Thompson Procedure Coordinator The inspector also talked with and ir :erviewed other employees including members of the administrative and operating staffc.
- Denotes those present at the exit int e rviev 2.
Procurement - Units 1, 2, and 3 The inspector conducted a review of the procurement program for Units 1, 2, and 3 to ascertain whether the purchase of components, materials and supplies used for safety related fun ~ctions was in conformance with the licensee's approved quality assurance program and implementing procedures. The inspection revealed that docu-mentary evidence was available onsite to support equipment and material conformance to quality control inspection and record requirements, and that components or materials used in safety related functions were supplied by approved vendors and inspected upon delivery.
The following purchase orders were reviewed onsite.
180178 215300 218499 180361 216900 221863 181019 216904 214208 216916 Those areas involving proper handling and storage were reviewed by the NRC resident inspector.
Those inspection finding are included in Inspection Reports No. 50-010/78-35, 50-237/78-34, and 50-249/78-35.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
3.
Records - Units 1, 2, and 3 The following records were reviewed to determine whether the licensee's program for control, storage retention and retrieval of records and documents was in conformance with the technical specifications and approved procedures for Units 1, 2, and 3, and as descri'ved by 10 CFR 50.59(b).
-2-
'
.
.
HPCI Construction Test Data, Procedure No. 8353-2, Unit 2 Isolation Condenser Temperature, September 5, 1973 - November 7, 1973, Unit 2 Reactor Log Book No. 60A, September 21, 1976 - October 30, 1976, Unit 3 Reactor Log Book No. 180, August 18, 1976 - September 16, 1976, Unit 1 Work Request No. 3442, Sphere Door, Unit 1 Work Request No. 1200, Accumulator 30-51 N2 Packing, Unit 3 Shift Operating Routine, February 18, 1974 - February 24, 1974 Torus Water Temperature, December 28, 1973 - January 29, 1974, Unit 2 Vessel Flange Temperature (Head to Flange), December 1, 1973 -
January 2, 1974, Unit 3 Reactor Vessel Water Level, October 7, 1975 - November 8, 1975, Unit 3 Core Spray Process Monitor, February 24, 1976 - April 29, 1976, Unit 1
-
Surveillance Tests of Reactor Protection Logic Trips, January 15, 1977 - December 20, 1977, Unit 3 Incore Neutron Monitoring Calibration and Surveillance, January 26, 1977 - December 15, 1977, Unit 1 Work Request No. 3046, Stanby Transforner, Unit 1 Work Request No. 5574, 480U Transformer, Unit 1 Work Request No. 3254, 48U Transformer, Units.2 and 3 Those areas involving as-built dravings and trend performance of equipment were reviewed by the NRC resident inspector. Those inspection findings are included in Inspection Reporto No. 50-010/78-35, 50-237/78-34 and 50-249/78-35.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
4.
Review of Safety Limits (SL), Limiting Safety System Settings (LSSS),
and Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCO) - Unit 1 A review of the Unit 1 routine operations for January through December of 1978 was made to determine that the licensee was complying with selected technical, specification safety limits, limiting safety system settings and limiting conditions for operations. The review included instrument charts, surveillance tests records, equipment outage logs, j umper and tag-out logs and control room logs.
Those specific entries reveiwed were during the following dates in 1978.
January 11 - January 14 January 21 - January 23 February 8 - February 11 March 1 - March 5 March 11 - March 15 April 5 - April 10 April 22 - April 25
- 3-
I
.
.
,
May 16 - May 19 June 9 - June 12 July 1 - July 4 July 21 - July 23 August 25 - Septem.ber 5 September 26 - October 2 Direct observation of process instrumentatior, was also made.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
5.
Procedures __- Unit s 2 and 3 A review of the following procedures indicated a licensee's conformance to regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 50.59 and Regulatory Guide 1.33 and that their technical adequacy was consistent with the intended mode of operation for Units 2 and 3.
These procedures include general operating procedures, startup, operacion or shutdown of safety related systems, abnormal or emergency conditions, maintenance and administrative procedures.
DGP 2-4 Revision 6 DOA 201-1 Revision 0 DGP 3-1 Revision 2 DOA 1000-1 Revision 1 DOP 1400-2 Revision 1 DOA 1400-1 Rdvision 0 DOP 1100-2 Revision 0 DOA 300-4 Revision 3 DOP 300-1 Revision 4 DOA 300-5 Revision 1 DOP 202-1 Revision 4 DOA 2300-1 Revision 0 DOP 2300-3 Revision 3 DOA 5750-4 Revision 0 DOP 7500-2 Revision 0 DOA 7500-1 Revision 2 DOP 5750-5 Revision 1 DWP 8 Revision 0 DOP 1000-3 Revision 1 DMP 248 Revision 1 DAP 11-5 Revision 1 DMP 249 Revision 4 DAP 2-3 Revision 10 DMP 258 Revision 0 DAP 2-4 Revision 2 DMP 276 Revision 0 DAP 2-2 Revision 3 DMP 252 Revision 0 Those areas involving temporary changes to procedures, changes in procedures to reflect technical specification revisions and changes to procedures in pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59(a) were reviewed by the NRC resident inspector. Those inspection find-ings are included in Inspection Reports No. 50-237/78-31 and 50-249/78-31.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
6.
Chemical Cleaning - Unit 1 The inspector reviewed the progress of the Unit 1 chemical cleaning program for the decontamination of the primary system of Unit 1.
The licensee's schedule indicated that construction of all necessary equipment and piping would be complete by mid-April 1979 and actual initiation of chemical cleaning would take-4-
.
.
place by approximately June 6, 1979.
Temporary attachments through man-ways in the primary side of two of the steam generators will serve as injection and recirculation connection points and a new piping _ penetration to the sphere will serve as the transfer point between the new radioactive waste processing building and the primary system of Unit 1.
No items of noncompliance were identified.
7.
Exit Interview T.e inspector met with the licensee's representatives, denoted in Paragraph 1, at the conclusion of the inspection on December 28, 1978. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.
_5_