ML20128H686

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deviation from Insp on 960801.Deviation Noted: Continuous Monitoring to Detect Steam Voiding Not Accomplished Due to Installation of Incorrect Type of RTD
ML20128H686
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/02/1996
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20128H654 List:
References
50-369-96-07, 50-369-96-7, 50-370-96-07, 50-370-96-7, NUDOCS 9610100033
Download: ML20128H686 (1)


Text

_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . -

i NOTICE OF DEVIATION i

i Duke Power Company i McGuire Nuclear Plant l

Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17 ,
l l During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1,1996 a deviation of your response to Generic Letter 88-03. Steam Binding of Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps, was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and t

Procedure for NRC Enforcement Action". NUREG 1600. the deviation is listed f below:

i McGuire Nuclear Station response to Generic Letter 88-03 Steam Binding of Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps. February 17, 1988, stated that the licensee would provide continuous monitoring of auxiliary feedwater piping to detect the formation of steam voids that could prevent the auxiliary feedwater pumps from performing their intended safety i function.

Contrary to the above, continuous monitoring to detect steam voiding was not accomplished due to the installation of an incorrect type of resistance thermal detector (RTD) to provide accurate indication of auxiliary feedwater piping temperatures and activation of control room alarms when temperatures exceeded established administrative limits.

This condition was identified on August 1.1996.

Please provide to the U.S., Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ATTN: Document Control Desk,llashington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional i Administrator. Region II, in writing within 30 days of the date of this Notice. (1) the reason for the deviation, or if contested, the basis for disputing the deviation. (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further deviations, and (4) the date when your corrective action will be completed.

Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 2nd day of October, 1996 Enclosure 2 9610100033 961002 PDR ADOCK 05000369 G PDR