ML14071A081

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217
ML14071A081
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A081 (32)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Fl- d -q Status: Y NEI u-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOO1B Equip. Class, Fquipment Deoscription 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL-18 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room. Area 343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist lor documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO Ur N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surrace YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U- N/AI
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI Un N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration veufed on 8128/12 per SEWS package dated 5/2594

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 162 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR41LOG5IB Equip. Class, Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBLrrON PANEI 16 Interacton Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures? YO NO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. Yj@ NE3 UI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 NO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YOEINO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Condioions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions or the equipment?

Qoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al cable had adequateflex. Al mnownin hardwareIs Nc and In good Cwdkm d zd h- 'L

  • 1 t1ldh Evaluated by: Takvib YbVow Date:

f 1 4

, w; Brian,NP hn~

Page 163 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-094 Sheet 3 of 3 Page 164 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 3 FI-0153 Status: Y[] No UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .IR42BOOIB Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 226 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorape

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO US N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YQI NO- US N/All oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI Ur- N/A[
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YQ NO US N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See Comments

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See Comments IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix R: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO N8[ UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R4280018 Equip.

Equipment Description 125 VOC B0S 18 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO Nil Un N/A[-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ni3 U[3 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NO UF' N/Arl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE UiQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[g No Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This walkdown was perormedto the extent possble. Intonals were Inspected and no adverse seismic conditionswere found. Anchorage verification was unable to be pedormed due to a bottom coverplate thatcan not be removed without racking out breakers. Therefore, this item will be consideredInaccessable. Item will be removed from the SWEL and this SWC will be includedIn the final report to document InternalsInspection.

Evaluated by:. a, son e~ý i' '  ? - Date: f/,5,j-4 Nknl. ArrnnYjO/J(QQJJ rjyj O.J1Yi.PEt#~

Nikole A Page 166 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-095 Sheet 3of 3 Page 167 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y0 NE U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA Equip. Class'. 1 Equipment Description Aux Slda Satteg= Charaer1A Location: Bldg. AS . Floor El. 121' Room, Area 224 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchornee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verfled in walkdowns dated8W29/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UI N/AQ-The anchorageIs free from potentially adverseseismic conditions.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NO3 UO N/AQ" oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U0 N/AI-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD! N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N3 UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 168 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 Nil UD" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O1R42EOOIA Equip. Class, Equipment Description Aux Bido Battery Charger 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NO Un N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 NO Un NIAO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO Url of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the battery chargerwas adequatelyrestrainedwith no loose connections and no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect battery chargerinternals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.

Evaluated by: LauraMaclay A'1/UA MO Date: 9ý-'I/h VE Tern' Alan Mullen& 7,1i /Z013

\%'A- " --01 e Page 169 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 170 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 171 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 172 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QAR43Eoo1A Equip. R Equipment Description Sbeaurmencer BIE Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139- Room, Area 335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) -_____

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/12

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U["] N/All The anchorageis free from potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UF N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NQ U0 NIAU-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI Uil N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/26/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 173 of 217

. ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a Sheet 2 of5 Status: YO NO U[3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR4M A Equip. Clan' Equipment Description jM'aiuEcrBlF Ieacton t

7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ye Nr3 U[3 N/An

, CR 497075 was writton prior to and outside the scope of the 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, which

,*.0tIdentified a potential seismic Interaction due to Elite 1115 being within 3" of the DO Sequencer E1lF. This condition has been evaluated to not poseaseismic Interaction concern, as documented In TI 497633. Since this condition was Identified prior to the walkdown, it will be joi/l resolved by normal plant processes, and therefore is not contained in Table 8-1 of the Report.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceing tiles and lighting, YCI NO Ur3 N/Ar' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO LO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UO3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Othe Adj Condld

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UrL adversely affect the safety ftnctions of the equipment?

Al equwatki Oe equNw "s adlqut* reahwtrafed *h no kwm cannecat andno mnaka bo&

Con~ts (Addional pqaes nay be added as noeauy)

SWC org com e on& 8/28/12. Finalwakdown peonnmedto iwpwteq wneintwm and vom &etanchoragef t"kan.

Area wak-bycoWfl~ WWII12 Evaluated by: Lu fflA _ Dar:

/.&zA%1

\j 4yj -/ (./

Page 174 of 217

4 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 175 of 217

0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 176 of 217

0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 177 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 5 Status: YO N[] uF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IFR43EOO2A Equip. Class, Equipment Description SeouencerBIFAux Relay PAne Location: Bldg. A6 Floor El. 139' Room. Area 434 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchoragein the panelwas verified in walkdowns dated8/28/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YS NO U[3 N/A[-I The anchorageIn the panel is free from potentiallyadverseseismic condriolns.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NOI UO N/AQ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI UQ3 N/AQl
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U3 N/AQ]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panelwas verifiedon 8/28/12 and Is consistent with SEWS package dated 5&25494.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEIO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Emcr the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 178 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI] ur"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43EO02A Equip. Classt.20 Equipment Description SeauencerBIFAux Relay Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UD N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO U0 N/All
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YCR NQ UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the sequencerpanel was adequatelyrestrained with no loose connections and no missingbolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/28/12. Finalwalkdown performed to inspect panelInternals and complete anchorageverification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/28/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay 'AlJIA& 76M/2(Lh.JJ"

.................... 7 Date: 2-/1tŽLI.3.

St/ OL,,

Term' Alan MAenix-4rZOi7O.- 4/-'ý

<Jur~ &7-Page 179 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 180 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 181 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 182 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: Y0 NEI U[-'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .SH21E525 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 61 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified againstSEWS for QSH21E525.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U0 N/AI-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U[ N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO Nn u1" N/An
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NEI U11 N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNO 0U]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 183 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO NO uO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1.2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interacto Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U0 N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UD N/A[
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N[3 UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO3 UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

ComentIs(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AWB Checklistdone with QSH22L502.

SWC completed SAT originly on 8/29/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet Internals.

IPEEE vulnerabilites(grout underpanel,add missing bolts, andrestrainoverheadlight) have been resolved.

Walkdown and SWC performed on 10/25/12 has been retypd for clartly.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos - Date:

Tailor Younsmblood ~ .

Page 184 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 m 1s fi ý j -- , - - W a- _* "1 4%

Page 185 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 V

I Page 186 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-I Page 187 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-- I f '-p Page 188 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

I-t~tC"_ All- X_._

&L." It -I Page 189 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 F! - 6 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmnent ID No. 0SH21E0528 Equip. Class,_20 liquipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. OE/EL Floor Il. 155' Room, Area 60 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may he used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEIL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJ of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage frWe of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIN NO UO N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO Ur N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NO UO N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 190 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 FI-lO4 Status: Y0 NO Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0=H21E0528 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESE GENERATO 1C LOCALCONTROL PANEL

7. Are sort targets 'ree from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO 130 N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI-I N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UQ NIAO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations. Isequipment free YO NO U of potentialiy adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditliob I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

oMmR! flL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ANl cable hadadequate flex. Instnumentaton was props* moW Them mes no misi hardware found. Baing of cabe to 1ca te ,loor appeard ingood condiftk.

IPEEEvulnerabili ee (grout underpanel and restrainoverhead ight) have been resolved Page 191 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106 Sheet 3 of 4 1C OG OCAL CONTROL PANEL QSH21E528-A Page 192 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 193 of 217

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A081&oldid=2453509"