ML14071A080

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217
ML14071A080
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A080 (54)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

. I Sheet 1 Of 5 Status: Yo N:] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0IR16B00Q6 Equip. Class' Equipment Description 600V Load Center 10 Location: Bldg. Ai R Floor El. 139' Room, Area 335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) _

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

AnchoraLe I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage In the front of the panel was veriffed in walkdowns dated 8/28112. Anchorage In rearof panel was added to reaolve IPEEE outlier.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y91 Nr' U-3 N/All The anchoragein the front and rearof the panel is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y09 NO U[3 N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YCM NO Un N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO Ui3 NIA-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage in front ofpanel Is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/27/94. Welds attachingload center to steel embeds in rearof panel (Bays 2 5, and 6, EW) were observed as being added to resolve IPEEEoutlier.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, Is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 108 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y[ Nr] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR16B0006 Equip. Class' Equipment Description 600V LoAl Center 1D Interaction Effects

7. Ar. soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO Un N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE Uo N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The front panels of the 600V Load Center were opened to review the anchorageof the internalcomponents. Ad equipment was adequately restrainedwith no oose connections and no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/28/12. Anchorage in the rearof the cabinet has been provided to resolve IPEEEconcerns and was verified by looking through the slats in the back panel of the Load Center. Finalwalkdown performed to Inspect cabinetinternals andcomplete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by Is located in FolderFI-98 (8/28/2012).

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay

  • QJ*T/O *T. Date: 'iL/3 Terri, Alan M Page 109 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 110 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 111 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a

Sheet 5 of 5 Page 112 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: YO N[] Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIRI7BO001 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC 1A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verified on 8/29/12 per SEWS package dated 5/25/94

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U0 N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NOI UO] N/AOI oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO3 UF" N/All
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI U-] N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified on 8/29/12 per SEWS package dated 5/25/94

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N0 U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 113 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO ND ul Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR17BO001 Equip. Class, Equipment Description MPCC 1A

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UD N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl NO UOF N/AF and masonry block walls no( likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YlU NO u0 NIAO Internals Inspection shows that all Internal lines have adequateflex and do not cause a seismic concern.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Interaction effects were walked down on 8/29/12 with no Interaction effects.

Page 114 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 7

'Ft-,%qt Status: YO ND Ufl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R1780001 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC 1A Other Advee Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0R NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

InternalsInspection has been performed and the following condition has been documented in CR 719207:

While performingthe NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown for Farley Unit 1 for 1A MCC, there were two Instances identified where selsmically qualifiedAgastat Relays were Installed with only three of the four requiredmounting screws. This condition haspreviously been evaluated for the 2A MCC, reference TE 640206 for the evaluation, and it has been determinedthat the current mounting configuration does not adversely Impact the functionalityof any of the relays In any of its operatingmodes (before, during, and after a DBE). The U2 evaluation has been reviewed and is bounding for the conditions found on UI 1A MCC. Therefore, the condition does not bring Into question the operabilityor functionality of the relays.

Although the relays remain functionaland operable, the relays should be reinstalledwith the intended mountingconfiguration of four screws at the earliest opportunityto return margin to the relays.

The relays associatedbreakercubicle locationsand affected loads are documented below:

BKR FAJ4R - Agastat Relays for BKR FAJ5 (1C CTMT POST ACCIDENT AIR MIXING FAN)

BKR FAJ4L - Agastat Relays for BKR FAIS (ID CTMT POST ACCIDENT AIR MIXING FAN)

Based on the evaluation for the as-found conditionof the Agastat relays being acceptable,thiscondition does not representan adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Addilional pages may be added as necessary)

External insection performed 8/29/12.

Second walidown performedon 10/16/13 to Inspectcabinet Internals. No adverse seismicconditions were noted during the final walkdown.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson ';ý *, Date: 10/11613 Nikole Arrnant L A a_ !0/16(13 Page 115 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-M8N (WR17BOOO1) Sheet 4of 7 Page 116 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-084N (Q11R178O001) Sheet 5 of 7 Page 117 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-084N (QIR17BO001) Sheet 6 of 7 Page 118 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-084N (Q1R17BO001) Sheet 7 of 7 Page 119 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 8 FI- o0-i Status: YN NEI urI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R17BO02 Equip. Class' Equipment Description MCCB 1 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121! Room, Area M0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of Ihe following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ref. SEWS dated5/26/1994

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware? YI NO UI N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UO N/AI oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U] N/A'
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YIN NO UO N/AF (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verified againstSEWS for 0IR17BO02 dated for 5/26/94 during walkdown performedon 9/10/12

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/10/12

' Enter the equipment clas name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipmenm Page 120 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YS N[l U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R17B002 Equip. Class Equipment Description MCCJ1B Interaction Effecs

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NEI Un N/All
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UQ N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment'?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO U[ N/Al
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Uf adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetinternals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internalconnections and outed cables have been determinedto be adequateand pose no adverse conditions.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 9/10/12.

IPEEEOutiler was verified to be resolved on 9/12/12.

Final walkdown performed on 2/5/13 to inspect cabinet internals. No adverse seismic conditions were noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date:

U-ý'

Tn-vIj Ynrrnhlrj;d Page 121 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet *qof 8 Page 122 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 8 4.

Page 123 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 8 Page 124 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 8 Page 125 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 8

/i I

Page 126 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 8 of 8 Page 127 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECK NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 Status: YO NO U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0IR17B0504 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC 1K Location: Bldg. SWlS Floor El. 188' Room, Area 72E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI Ur N/Ar
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO Ul N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO Ul NIAO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of EquipmenL Page 128 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of4 status: YO NEI tiE Seimia Wulkdown Chwoldist (SWC)

EqulpmeatIlD No. 2MRI 7350 qulp.

Equlpme~ Description MAcQ 1K

7. Are soafk uw free fromim t by narby equlpmet or aUcturms? YO ND UE3 N/AD
8. Are overhad dpmLt, dlm'budon systns, calling dies and lighting, YE N[3 U3 bVAD and mIasory block walls not likely to collusa onto th equipment?
9. Do aitached lines have adequae flexiblilty to avoid dumsp? YB NO U1 N/AD Werymab hwpuclwi show~tit aI#bteraIli k m ho adeqma law and d notipoe a ew* coem.
10. Bamed on the above seimic nterhmdon evalutdons, Isequipment fiie YO ND JE]

of potentially adverse seisde interaction effects?

h*a

  • m efift wwr tmu ddmo n I/20/1 No rmW

- Ft wokd

-ffl II. Hls you looked for and faoud no Oer seismic codidon tha could YE NO3 .[3 adversely a~ect the sfay hctions of th equdpment?

to be W ad &* 1h goodoolo. oadae Amenl on*wm nood CIMil p*ltln MmI mIj be added as mmaIp Etma 11frs11: pwamw anw1 Wl/2 -

Wakvm wd SW perwmed orualyon WV/1713 has been n ed anwd ee fOr tor.* -

This SWC supersedes the SWC contained In Attachment 3 (Pages 347-348). 2.tr2l~ot Evaluated br. AnanItýA AMWA DM& hz zq4i2Aqb T~hvin Ymubkod 4 14Q~.c

(ýv i Page 129 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-086N (Q1R17B0504) Sheet 3 of 4 MCG IK T R17 R5 II Page 130 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-086N (Q11R17B0504) Sheet 4 of 4 Page 131 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 6 "11-Of9'A)

Status: YZ ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR17BO507 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC IN Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 60 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UO N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AD oxidation?
4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO Ur N/A9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NDE U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 132 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-0V7A) Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y0 N[3 U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 01R1780507 Equip. Class, Equipment Description M1CC IN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UD N/AD Interaction effects walked down during external Inspection on 8/29/12.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables have adequate flex. The leftmost Termnal block in cabinet FNB1 is missing one of the lower mounting screws. This is judged to not be a seismic concern due to the minimal weight of the block (<10 Ibs). Three of four screws areIntact and in good condition. CR 722630 has been written to document this condition and request replacement.

Comments(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Externalinspectionperformed on 8/29/12.

Anchorage modification has been performed to resolve IPEEEvulnerability. Cabinethas been bolted to back wall to enhance anchorage.

Second walkdown to Inspect internalson 10/18/13 found no adverse seismic conditions.

Secondary walkdown and SWC performed 10/18/13 has been retyped for clarity.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson 1 5ae Dt: 2- /. Zp Nikole Arran( N&ý '--

Page 133 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-087N (Q1111713OS07) Sheet 3of 6 Page 134 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-087N (Q11117130507) Sheet 4of 6 Page 135 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-087N (Q01R17B0507) Sheet S of 6 Page 136 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-087N (Q1R17BOSO7) Sheet 6of 6 Page 137 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YO NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R18B0029 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description PowerDisconnect Switch Location: Bldg. AU Floor El. A!3 Room, Area W, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofrequipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results orjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UQ" N/AD The anchorageIs free from potentiallyadverse seismic condilons.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/AQ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YFI NOI UO NIAO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 138 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y9 NE uD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R18B029 Equip. Class' Equipment Description Power Disconnect Switch Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO N[ UO NIAO
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIg NO Ur N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO U- N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0R NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the disconnectswitch was adequatelyrestrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performedto inspect disconnect switch internals and complete anchorageverification.

Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.

Evaluated by: Laura Macla, Date: -/13 Ter Alan Mulle... .. _

WOO~ 13

\J\,i V C Page 139 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Page 140 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 141 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet Iof 4 Status: YO NEI U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R18B0031 Equip. Class Equipment Description Circuit BreakerBox Location: Bldg. A@ - Floor El. la3 Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoru I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UD N/Al The anchorageis free from potentiallyadverse seismic condlons.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U- N/A-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U" N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UF N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO Ni UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 142 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y10 NEI Uf-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 010180=31 Equip. Class' Equipment Description C-Irziut Weke Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO NIAI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO U- NIAQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the circuitbreakerbox was adequatelyrestrained with no loose connectionsand no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect circuitbreakerbox internals andcomplete anchorageverification.

Area walk-by completed 8/29/12..

Evaluated by: Laura Macia C4 Date: i h -3 Terr Alan Mullel\1.o - f Z013 V&,v Page 143 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 144 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 145 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NFI UEF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR18B035 Equip.

Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area !21 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional hut recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorafe I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N[3 or the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verified using SEWS dated 3/20/95 on 9/10/12

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO Nr- UO N/AI Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO Nil UI- N/AI oxidation?

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO' UO] N/AQl Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO N[3 UO- N/AQ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Verfied to match SEWS on 9/10/12

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl UF" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes or Equipment.

Page 146 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YI N[ U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Classý Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NOI UO NIAD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UO N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yj@ NEI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed SAT originallyon 9/10/12.

Final walkdown performedto inspect cabinetinternals.

Area walk-by completed 9/1012012 Evaluated by: Laura Maclaid Y 1-C 1AA Date:

Ten-vAlan M-U&le/ LaQ k.. tDI Kýi KJ '*' -1 (-I Page 147 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 148 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 149 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y0 N[i UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O1R21BOOlA Equip. Class Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY. Floor El. 1,V Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorsee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO or the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UD N/AQ Anchorageconfirmed SAT on 10&25/12
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO Ul N/AQ oxidation?

Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10125/12

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NR UO N/AO Anchorage confirmed SAT on 10125/12
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage confirmedSAT on 10/25/12 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 150 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NE] u[r Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOOIA Equip. Class' Equipment Description yVTALAC BREAKER BOX Interaction Effeefti

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YS NO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UF' N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO uo N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YOl NO UEO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed SAT originallyon 10/25/12.

Finalwalkdown performed to inspect cabinetinternals.

Area walk-by completed 8/21/2012 Evaluated by: LauraMaclav 4W Date: I/*l'l TerrAlan M In Page 151 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Page 152 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 153 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of"4 Status: Y; N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R21E2 _ Equip. Class' 14 E-quipmnent Description INVERTER 1C Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121' Room, Area 226 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions rot Completing aCecklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may he used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end or this checklist for documenting other comments.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NOI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YCR NO Ul N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U-I N/AQ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Ylg NO U-I NIAO
5. is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YS NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationverified on 9/WI/12 per SEWS package dated 5124(94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO U-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clases or Equipmet.

Page 154 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/-e1g- Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Yo No u[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIRRIEO009C Equip.

Equipment Description INVERffTER IC Interaction Effect%

7. Are sort targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UED N/AO3
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. YO NO UO' N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO' Ur3 N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0NO UIO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI[ NO 1.u13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cards, relays, and othersensitive equipment Is adequateymounted and In good condition. All cables have adequateflex. No adverse seismic condtlons were noted.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson l .. - Date:  !/I r/1 Nikole Arrant Q 2 h_ c Page 155 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-092 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 156 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-092 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 157 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO.,' SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 Status: Yi Nil UO3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0Q1S 11 Equip. Class, .

Equipment Description !L1KVYSW1*ARIL2 X SURGE ARRESTOR w

Location: Bldg. DES& , Floor El. 1 HM Room, Area g=I6 Manuracturer. Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

I o for Completing C cklis This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findinis. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

afukmn I. Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (I.e, is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NO UO NIAO Conm dSAT OnILIWf 1/30/2013 \, 1'1101 YNO UO N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is mom than mild surface oxidation?

0w ,8AT m 1.43*r113012013* -2,jt3)21+-

YO NO UO N/AD

4. Is the anchorap free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Co*YmdSATon4A 2"130/2013 a - -x I 131Wt YO NO UO N/AO

5. Is the anchore configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorap configuration verification Is required.)

SEWa Pacag daded S&6194.Ve~*d4. 11 d&t &lW wah in t0 muewl.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YONE3UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ConfnrdSATwnJAVft* 1/30/2013 q*b~u -a I;loWi

,Ea i equiaa cldo nae from Appoix B: Osum of EquiumL Page 158 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y0 NO" U["

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R36A511 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IL SURGE ARRESTOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO Ni3 UDI N/AD-There are three cables in the panel, only two are restrainedwith zip ties (see picture). However, this does notpose a seismic risk as there is adequateclearancearoundthe unrestrainedcable.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO N[3 Url N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YCM N[3 U[3 N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YC! Nil Ul" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC9 NDI UED adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cabinetdoor was opened andInternals were inspected and found to pose no adverse conditions. All cables were adequatelyrestrained,no loose connections and no missing bolts were noted.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 8/24/12.

Finalwalkdown performed to inspect cabinet internalsand complete anchorageverification on 1/30/13.

Area walk-by completed with Q2R1 18507.

Evaluated by: ra M Date: 2/12,/1, Tern-AMatn Muleiý, 42 .f... .

1 /

\11"Y V - U Page 159 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 160 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 i

Page 161 of 217 I

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A080&oldid=2453510"