|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14051A7342014-02-20020 February 2014 Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 NL-14-0249, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 22014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 2 ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachme2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0812014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217 ML14071A0802014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 ML14071A0792014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 ML14071A0742014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 ML14071A0772014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 ML14071A0752014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0732014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 ML14071A0722014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0672014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet 1 ofatu Status: 7*NO U0- 9/*i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSR43A 503 Equip. Class Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 4+18fK~ft IC A sJ.
Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area a ,
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorame
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YNOUQ1 N/AQl
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y4/Nf- UD N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y5/N- UE" N/AD3
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YdNEI U-- N/A[:]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) J Q5
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? ý 5 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 501 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet? ofX'A(gM Status: Y[V'N- U[-i 114f Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSR43A503 Equip. Class' 17 IC .A 0@4' -
Equipment Description DIESEL GENERA TOR-4-A499W-Interaction Effects /
YRINDNuO N/AD
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YM/ND UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
Y4 ND UD N/AD Y4 NDU[]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions could YM'ND' U-
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
- N _N .
S7 I1Dhia I Ae Date: t) L t-0/
Evaluated by: 111-
/26"Il
%5'40 e, ar-17-~ 4 ~~~~
PA111 A -M'isN!
S-- - > /- I-,
Page 502 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 503 of 562 mli
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 504 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/s Status: Y N UN-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSV49KOOIA Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM PACKAGE A/C UNIT Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 175 Room, Area 6-¶0Žt Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchornae
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y; NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI NEI UiD N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YA ND UID N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YM NDI UEl N/AD
- . Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[4 NO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of yyND UOJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 505 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/. 1I,5 Sheet 2 ofr2 Status: Yf$ NO U0]
Seismic Watikown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSV49KOO0A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM PACKAGE A/C UNIT Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YPNEI UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP ND UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YT ND UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND UO of potentiafly adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:D Date: Z L-Page 506 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 507 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 508 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 509 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of" +
Status: Y0 NE] U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSW41B515F, Pkq Equip. Class, 18 Fl-116 Equipment Description SERV WTR BATTERY ROOM FIRESTA T Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NO U- N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NO UO N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO UO N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
No anchoragedrawings/documentation
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 510 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of1 *-
Status: YE NEI U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No, QSW41B515F. Pka Equip. Class' 18 FI-116 Equipment Description SERV WTR BATTERY ROOM FIRESTAT Interact ion Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NiO UO N/AO Tubing too close to piping, see pix, entered in CAP (CR505553, CR504972)
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEJ UEI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
nothing noted overhead that can collapse, see #7.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NUI UU N/AU electrical,tubing, ppg insp;ected
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NEI U1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
see #7 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk By is in folder F1-1 18, equipment QSW41C507C This package was originally signed on 8-30-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-23-12.
Evaluated by: b T elecon /saur z/Z Date: 8/30/12 Te A. /
/,1, is- 23-1j,. 8/30/12 Page 511 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 512 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 c-- -I I
'p AI-6i Page 513 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of $5 Status: Y* Nn] U]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSW41C5O6B Equip. Class' Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area '
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y9 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YP NO UO N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YP NO IJO N/AD oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YR NO U[ N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y& NO U- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y6 NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 514 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl- 117 Sheet 2 of,$%
Status: YIPNO U[]
Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ED No. QSW41C506B Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YFI NE UQ N/AE
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y59 NO UC N/AC-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YPNO UD N/AC
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YiQ NO Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R No UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Date: It*t.A?-
c*' 1*'.
Page 515 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
- :: - 117 Page 516 of 562 I
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F-l- /r)
Fl-I 7 4/5-Page 517 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 "j-7 FLIA Page 518 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-1 I Sheet 1 oV,5 Status: v1ý NM UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSW41C507C Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER A TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area "1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y4 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? ,, NO UC N/AI
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface VY'R NO UC N/AC oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YA NO UC N/AC
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YP NO UO N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
uel'N3 D"1- wIG V'ea' r.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[ýNO U17 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 519 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F:-- /iF Sheet 2 of/5 Status: YEP NE] UI"]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OSW41C507C Equip. Class, 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER A TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
yI NO Ur N/A-
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NI U- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? N
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
I NO U["] N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YýNO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: An 4 l 1CYAJ Wu mori.(]'l Date: _/_2.__h 2_
I Page 520 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 521 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 522 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 523 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofi4 Status: Y N) UN]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSW41C513D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP ROOM INTAKE LOUVER Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 167 Room, Area "7*A.A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchora2e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
h%jn OýCd'NV~4c. doUCt1Wqii~h
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? NOI Ut] N/A[3
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y Nt] Ut N/At3 oxidation?
Y*NO" UO"N/AE1
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yk NtI Ut] N/At (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y Nt] Ut]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 524 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of¶4 Status: Y r- U NEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSW41C513D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP ROOM INTAKE LOUVER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? VN ND UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? I
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y N0 UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? I' Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated b.\
Q1/2' A. M(4*11*$IX.Date: ~2-Q1Z, t*W)A ~&~t~ ~A?~t Page 525 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 526 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 527 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1ofP Status: Y N[- U[
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSY41C511C Equip. Class1 9 Equipment Description DIESEL BLD B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. tW MI.. Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? %
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YV NO U- N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage fee of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yj$ NO UO N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO UO N/AC
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN[NO UO N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YfR NO U potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 528 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0 -ýL Sheet 2 of' 7 Status: YO] NO uE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QSY41C511C Equip. Class, 9 Equipment Description DIESEL BLD B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? ND Ur- N/ACl
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YQ NO U] N/AD1
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YT NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y$ NO U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added 6 necessary)
I~Mot Evaluated by: ~fpiiuf { c~jLawa-z Mo'cq.~~ Date: 9L,/ f 2
\ x.j v A, -lk (-t Page 529 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 530 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 531 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 532 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
I Page 533 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0O NI Zs-
.- '-i Page 534 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r FI,-12,! Sheet i ofj{
Status: YO NI Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. MIR43TS04 Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Descripton DIESEL GENERATOR 18 STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK #2 Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0058 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Scisnic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS package dated 4/W94.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UO N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yg NO UIO N/AF
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 535 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I FI-IZI Sheet 2 ofX'4 Status: YO NO UO Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1R437504 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK #2
- 7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? NE NO O N/AO 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOUO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached fines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIN NO UD NIAO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
OthrAdvrse Cmodo.
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
C o ft (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: LauraMacwyv "C sI , pc C2 Date: 13 -.?- klf~
T V AlV i-2" j Page 536 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 537 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 jf/--/*L Page 538 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 2
Sheet 1 of ,
Status: Y'a N[] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentIDNo. Q1EI1MOV8811A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CTMTSUMP TO 1A RHR PUMP Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorate
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] N '/
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UI" N/AW-"
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO3 UQ- NIA&'
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO3 U- N/At<
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOI NO UQ N/A2--"I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE-NO UO1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 539 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,$ 4A*"
Status: YZ NM UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEI1MOV8811A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO 1A RHR PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y1240 UQ N/AQ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yt!/NO UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV"NO UO N/AO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO'NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YQ41Q U3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
.I (V/1.~
1 ~JI (27j ii% " ,i-LF Evaluated by: '!ti . Date: 1, 2. K' ,o ,*_
Page 540 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS T
""7"
--r.3 xi Page 541 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 T,
N 4
I A
Page 542 of 562